Charlie "Lucky" Luciano & His Time In London UK With Meyer Lansky 1951

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @sunflowerdownunder
    @sunflowerdownunder 3 місяці тому +1

    There must have been so many people in the Judicial system, Politicians, Police in their pockets.
    Thank you so much.🌻🌻

  • @giovannimarino7449
    @giovannimarino7449 3 місяці тому +4

    This was great thank you

  • @johnwright291
    @johnwright291 3 місяці тому +3

    I have a book that i bought at a big used book store in Tacoma Washington where i live. The title is simply the Lucky Luciano story. The date on the inside cover is 1994 but i believe that its kind of a compilation of several different authors from way back to the late 40s to the 60s. The authors on the cover are Sid Feder and Joachim Joesten. It is 300 pages and oddly i couldn't find it or reference to it in my local library. But it covers a lot of what is presented here. I thought i had lost it but when i started watching this i dug around and thank god i found it. It will be fun comparing whats in the book to this video that i have only watched up to 22.44. One thing i will mention is that near the end of the book it engages in speculation about the possibility that Luciano actually spent time living in the states incognito. And imagine how shocked i was when it was suggested that he lived in little old Tacoma Washington for a spell. I doubt it but Meyer Lanskys son paul did live in Tacoma for 20 years. He was stationed at nearby Mchord air force base while in the airforce. And i feel the need to mention that my local library has the new york times on microfilm going back to the 19th century. In it is the story of Lucianos abduction in 1929 in great detail proving beyond all doubt that it happened....cheers ! PS. I have found on the cover of the book that it actually first appeared in 1954. Shortly before the interview presented here.

  • @isaiahsalazar2431
    @isaiahsalazar2431 3 місяці тому +4

    great video

  • @AntonyRichards-jx8vr
    @AntonyRichards-jx8vr 2 місяці тому +3

    It’s interesting how historically inaccurate the British 1950s article is.

  • @RyanHunter723
    @RyanHunter723 2 місяці тому +2

    That journalist was really laying it on thick with some of these descriptions. Pretty pompously too

    • @nightrider12soul
      @nightrider12soul 2 місяці тому

      Berry pompous and he pushed him to reveal the secrets.Rubbish.

  • @jamieherring1803
    @jamieherring1803 3 місяці тому +3

    Naw man! I think Albert Anastasia was far more wicked than lucky Luciano! The story’s ive heard about Albert makes Lucky look like a saint! This man was pure evil like the book called Lord high executioner explains everything about this man’s character

    • @williamshakespeare9815
      @williamshakespeare9815 3 місяці тому +1

      Agree. Luciano seems more like a businessman and Anastasia was a cold blooded killer. Everyone who saw him said he enjoyed killing people.

    • @RyanHunter723
      @RyanHunter723 2 місяці тому

      There is A LOT of exaggeration by the British journalist.

    • @RyanHunter723
      @RyanHunter723 2 місяці тому

      And haywire timeline of events. The Masseria and Diamond events were closer to 1930 than 1i920.

    • @jamieherring1803
      @jamieherring1803 2 місяці тому

      @@RyanHunter723 Okay. Do you think Lucky was more wicked than Albert? What is your thoughts