Military Spending by Country | 1830-2022

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 бер 2023
  • This video ranks the top 15 countries in the world by military spending per year from 1830 to 2022. Spending is calculated in US dollars and is not adjusted for inflation.
    *
    *
    *
    Source: ourworldindata, SIPRI
    Music: Hearts of Iron IV
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 3,1 тис.

  • @gozhdaa
    @gozhdaa  Рік тому +1039

    1833-1840 Carlist War
    1839-1842 First Opium War
    1846-1848 Mexican-American War
    1853-1856 Crimean War
    1861-1865 American Civil War
    1866 Austro-Prussian War
    1870-1871 Franco-Prussian War
    1877-1878 Russo-Turkish War
    1898-1899 Spanish-American War
    1904-1905 Russo-Japanese War
    1910-1919 Mexican Border War
    1912-1913 Balkan Wars
    1914-1918 World War I
    1917-1922 Russian Civil War
    1927-1949 Chinese Civil War
    1937-1945 Second Sino-Japanese War
    1939-1945 World War II
    1947-1991 Cold War
    1950-1953 Korean War
    1955-1975 Vietnam War
    1980-1988 Iran-Iraq War
    1990-1991 Gulf War
    2003-2011 Iraq War
    2001-Present War on Terror
    2022-2023 Russo-Ukrainian War

    • @jammin5563
      @jammin5563 Рік тому +27

      Can you give me a prediction on how much russias budget went up between 2022-2023

    • @doncomuna378
      @doncomuna378 Рік тому +36

      1864-1870 Paraguay War

    • @leandrospimpolo7439
      @leandrospimpolo7439 Рік тому +9

      @@doncomuna378 esqueceram e ficou bem fora o grafico em

    • @doncomuna378
      @doncomuna378 Рік тому +2

      @@leandrospimpolo7439 Fora ou foda?

    • @ivoleser
      @ivoleser Рік тому +83

      2014-2023 Russo-Ukrainian War

  • @hailexiao2770
    @hailexiao2770 Рік тому +1125

    The Soviet Union spending $300 billion on defense in 1985 is insane. As a % of GDP, that's like USA or China spending $3.5 trillion on defense in 2023.

    • @yawnbob
      @yawnbob Рік тому +66

      Это СССР коммунизм вперед

    • @insomnia20422
      @insomnia20422 Рік тому +175

      They were literally printing tanks at some point.

    • @canadaphil6068
      @canadaphil6068 Рік тому +275

      One of the major reasons they bankrupted themselves while their people lived in 1 room apartments with a communal bathroom and stood in line each day for stale bread.

    • @SirEggo2412
      @SirEggo2412 11 місяців тому +267

      @@pumaa8416 if the USSR was so good why do majority of the eastern bloc never want to go back and tell me who ran to what side of Berlin when the wall fell?

    • @cadennorris960
      @cadennorris960 11 місяців тому +132

      @@pumaa8416You’re lying to yourself. My house is made of hardie board, stucko and rebar. My roof is secured to the foundation. Every new home in my area has to be made up to a certain code set by the county. Houses around the country vary greatly. If the USSR was so great why did it collapse? Just face it, your military spent more than it should have on a futile effort and we saw the results of that in 1991. Of course that’s not the only reason the USSR collapsed.

  • @pahtar7189
    @pahtar7189 Рік тому +946

    These dynamic graphs are much more useful when you note major events within the video. For example starting in 1859 the US undergoes a meteoric rise then plumets after 1866. It's due to the Civil War of course, but many of the dramatic changes aren't so obvious - at least to me.

    • @Yegoros
      @Yegoros Рік тому +9

      1986 - Chernobyl in USSR, after that in 87 you see it that spendings in USSR began to rapidly decrease

    • @losarpettystrakos7687
      @losarpettystrakos7687 Рік тому +65

      @@Yegoros It has nothing to do with Chernobyl. In mid 80s the Soviet Economy was already in shambles and the crisis started to accelerate rapidly.

    • @Yegoros
      @Yegoros Рік тому +19

      ​@@losarpettystrakos7687 Yes, it was in crisis in mid-80s. But you don't know communists. They will never decrease spending on the army unless something serious happens. And this serious was Chornobyl. Total loss from this catastrophe is more than 250 bln usd in today's money

    • @le_meme_man8983
      @le_meme_man8983 Рік тому +7

      @@Yegoros Sure. Believe what you want

    • @Yegoros
      @Yegoros Рік тому +10

      @@le_meme_man8983 that's what ppl say when they have no arguments)

  • @lepage7120
    @lepage7120 Рік тому +486

    800 billion dollars. Can you smell it? That smell of democracy

    • @n1gtwhisper158
      @n1gtwhisper158 2 місяці тому +18

      I dont think the budget has technically increased for a long while if you factor in inflation.

    • @serrael-182
      @serrael-182 2 місяці тому +25

      Yes cuz democracy lets you have this kind of economy that allowes those numbers.

    • @jctr4307
      @jctr4307 2 місяці тому +12

      Democracy is not peace. Don't be a child 😅

    • @donaldtrumplover2254
      @donaldtrumplover2254 2 місяці тому +9

      Hail Democracy!!!!!!

    • @A_Steam_User
      @A_Steam_User 2 місяці тому +5

      *helldivers 2 intensifies*

  • @titanx8199
    @titanx8199 Рік тому +387

    You know germany is up to something when their military budget explodes 😂😂😂😊

    • @ismailsancak3652
      @ismailsancak3652 Рік тому +11

      jews are crying

    • @Big_Caesar1
      @Big_Caesar1 Рік тому

      @@ismailsancak3652 You're sick

    • @Arragon97
      @Arragon97 11 місяців тому

      ​@@ismailsancak3652Israel sells weapons to Germany, I think they are happy Germanys higher budget.

    • @oerlikon20mm29
      @oerlikon20mm29 4 місяці тому +4

      @@ismailsancak3652when are they not?

    • @83nitish
      @83nitish 4 місяці тому +52

      In 21st century Germany is nothing more than a US puppy. Those days are long gone and not coming back trust me.

  • @bifa5414
    @bifa5414 Рік тому +357

    5:55 I like how after WWII Poland jumped straight into 3rd place

    • @oskich7758
      @oskich7758 Рік тому +6

      Yes, how

    • @bifa5414
      @bifa5414 Рік тому +68

      @@oskich7758 Because it didn't exist during war (it was occupied by Soviet Union and Germany) so after it was brought back it was spending huge portion of GDP on military. Which is interesting considering that it wasn't a totally free country for over 200 years

    • @atanasvasilev3228
      @atanasvasilev3228 Рік тому

      Thats what oppression does to people- maxes the army and economy.

    • @okand1921
      @okand1921 Рік тому +9

      ​@@bifa5414 It was in Warsaw pact which explains military spendings)

    • @pootmcgoot5458
      @pootmcgoot5458 Рік тому +1

      @RyanMiller-tb6fd thats post ww2 my dude

  • @SebHaarfagre
    @SebHaarfagre Рік тому +345

    First of all, I love that the HoI3/4 soundtrack is used.
    Secondly, ridiculous how well it fits dynamically with the graphs?!?
    Third, as a history nerd, this is simply the best

    • @bunkerkorpf1440
      @bunkerkorpf1440 9 місяців тому

      History nerd ?
      Kingdom of France in 1853 ? LMAO

    • @Joebinlaggin513
      @Joebinlaggin513 3 місяці тому

      @@bunkerkorpf1440Kingdom of France ended in 1870 after the Franco-Prussian war

    • @Joebinlaggin513
      @Joebinlaggin513 3 місяці тому

      So if you don’t believe that there was a kingdom of france in 1853 then you’re wrong

    • @bunkerkorpf1440
      @bunkerkorpf1440 3 місяці тому

      @@Joebinlaggin513 There was no Kingdom of France in 1853 or 1870, youre ignorant.
      It was the Second Empire held by Napoleon III, a totally different thing.

    • @steveweidig5373
      @steveweidig5373 2 місяці тому

      @@bunkerkorpf1440 French empire would be more correct since Napoleon III was an emperor, not a king. Napoleon III choose the title of emperor over king because "King" (or "Roi" in French) has been a very unpopular title ever since the French Revolution, but otherwise was a bog-standard monarchy of the time.
      Simply leaving the country as France (outside of the Vichy regime) would have avoided this and would technically been correct, too.

  • @zacharymoye7272
    @zacharymoye7272 Рік тому +177

    Damn, France kicked serious ass for nearly a century 😳.

    • @Zx17OPv57i
      @Zx17OPv57i Рік тому +84

      France was the best for long time

    • @ryanhampson673
      @ryanhampson673 Рік тому +64

      France was the strongest land army in Europe for hundred of years. They catch a lot of flak for surrendering during WW2 but they lost 92,000 troops in a matter of months and were just over run.

    • @user-hz2eh3iq1f
      @user-hz2eh3iq1f Рік тому +5

      ​@@ryanhampson673 this is not an excuse SOViet Union lost 27, 000, 000

    • @ryanhampson673
      @ryanhampson673 Рік тому +30

      @@user-hz2eh3iq1f True, but lack of good Soviet commanders at the start didn’t help. Stalin purged all the good officers because he was a paranoid maniac. But as an American I do understand the great sacrifice the Soviets undertook…With huge amounts of American food and equipment to help.

    • @Scriptvm
      @Scriptvm Рік тому +23

      Nous étions jadis un grand et beau pays..

  • @ashhathaway4144
    @ashhathaway4144 10 місяців тому +194

    It's interesting to note that Soviet military spending surpassed the United States in 1969, and remained significantly higher throughout the 1970s. The Carter and Reagan military build-ups are noticeable in the late 1970s and into the 1980s. Excellent graphs, thank you for posting this!

    • @Ravie3
      @Ravie3 3 місяці тому +14

      Soviets spending more than they could afford.

    • @foreignfat6009
      @foreignfat6009 3 місяці тому +9

      ​@@Ravie3Nonsense, they fell due to political pressure, not economical. Stop this misinformation..
      By your logic North Korea should have fallen a long time ago. Soviet citizen definitely had it better than North Korean have it now. Even starving Ukrainians had it better.

    • @derpidius6306
      @derpidius6306 3 місяці тому

      ​@foreignfat6009 North Korea is propped up by China, if China wasn't holding their hand NK would collapse even without an external invasion

    • @GareBear420
      @GareBear420 2 місяці тому +18

      @@foreignfat6009 I wonder what could have possibly contributed to the large amount of political pressure placed on the soviet regime... Definitely not anything to do with the appalling economic conditions most of the soviet citizenry found themselves in.

    • @foreignfat6009
      @foreignfat6009 2 місяці тому +1

      @@GareBear420 Maybe ridiculous amount of ethnicity and different religion? And different cultures, which were suppressed. You are forgetting that Soviet Union was union of mostly poor countries. Russia was pretty much the richest and that doesn't say much after WW1, civil wars and ww2. It was impressive what they did with a poor ruin.
      Again, North Korea has worse conditions for their people than most Soviet union and it didn't collapse out of economic pressure. And they won't. They need military coup or outside intervention to collapse. They don't have to deal with so much diversity.
      If USA swapped places geographically, they wouldn't be a superpower. USA had huge economic issues, and it didn't collapse. USA had way less diversity than Soviet union.

  • @AmmarAlshomali
    @AmmarAlshomali Рік тому +83

    When the soviet union collapsed but still the United States didn't stop spending...

    • @engineerenginering8633
      @engineerenginering8633 3 місяці тому +5

      Why would they stop? And a lot of it has to do with inflation too.

    • @Septimus_ii
      @Septimus_ii 3 місяці тому +5

      In real terms it decreased, but not massively

    • @LB-jw3ly
      @LB-jw3ly 3 місяці тому +9

      Defense contractors didn’t collapse.

    • @falcon_224
      @falcon_224 2 місяці тому +1

      ​@@Septimus_iiUS dollars value hasn't depreciated that much in the past 30 years

    • @sonikUk
      @sonikUk 2 місяці тому +1

      China...

  • @creanero
    @creanero Рік тому +119

    The brief appearance of what should be the Irish Free State (instead of the Republic of Ireland, a term that wasn't used until 1948) on this chart says something about how absurdly expensive the civil war was.

    • @johnwayne7673
      @johnwayne7673 11 місяців тому +10

      I was there ...the price of a pint back then I'll tell you something

    • @user-gd1bx8te9n
      @user-gd1bx8te9n 10 місяців тому

      خلاصه جمهوری اسلامی ایران داره بر اسرائیل پیروز میشه . نیروی های روشنایی پیروز میدان هستند

    • @kodiwtf
      @kodiwtf 2 місяці тому

      @@johnwayne7673 Can't imagine the price of a pint back in the 50s or 60s cost more, course getting the money for it would be tough. How much was it do you remember?

  • @victorbroquart693
    @victorbroquart693 Рік тому +53

    In 1856, there is no French kingdom, we were ruled by Napoleon III, the Second Empire, after Napoleon was elected as the first French president democratically elected, he declared the empire one year later.

    • @SebHaarfagre
      @SebHaarfagre Рік тому +4

      There's an animation between each year. For simplicity (for the eyes), it might be better this way

    • @Chriswaddle77
      @Chriswaddle77 Рік тому +1

      ​@Коля Красоткин oui comme Poutine

    • @testmaxfad
      @testmaxfad 11 місяців тому

      @@user-ct9sj3rh8p Гитлер НЕ пришел к власти на демократических выборах. Он получил место рейхсканцлера благодаря коррупционному скандалу, связанным с сука-сыночкой Гинденбурга, а партия НСДАП не получила большинства мест в парламенте, чтобы принимать решения без оглядки на другие партии. НСДАП вместо демократических процедур просто убивали депутатов других партий, ввели антиконституционный запрет на коммунистическую партию, и ввели антиконституционные законы, ограничивающие права и свободы граждан. НСДАП и Гитлер сломали демократические институты, они к своей абсолютной власти на выборах НЕ приходили - они власть ЗАХВАТИЛИ. Формально во время ВМВ у Германского рейха была конституция, гарантирующая права и свободы граждан, но НСДАП просто ее игнорировали.

    • @Rex_87
      @Rex_87 11 місяців тому +1

      ​@@Chriswaddle77👌thx

    • @bunkerkorpf1440
      @bunkerkorpf1440 9 місяців тому +1

      1852 and after, not 1856

  • @Zopiexx
    @Zopiexx Рік тому +741

    The Soviet Union had the lead for quite a while

    • @ltmammaguerillz6745
      @ltmammaguerillz6745 Рік тому

      We just weren't dick swinging for the moon cuz we weren't being pressed. Don't F with America, you watch what happens in any world war when America joins

    • @doncomuna378
      @doncomuna378 Рік тому +74

      The USSR already had a lot of weapons before the war, so they didn't have to spend that much.

    • @ltmammaguerillz6745
      @ltmammaguerillz6745 Рік тому +80

      ​@Terror do Ocidente old weapons, tech is always improving and R&D innovation is why countries who stop spending fall way behind on the global scale. Seems like USA decided to conquer the planet in like 1988 and juiced the spending to like $275 billion a year and it never went down after that just straight climbed to almost a trillion dollars from then till now.

    • @doncomuna378
      @doncomuna378 Рік тому +60

      @@ltmammaguerillz6745 The Americans realized that even though they were the number 1 power, they still weren't able to defeat half of a country that was fighting with Russian AK 47 rifles, wearing slippers, and a "drum cymbal" on their head. After the embarrassment, they started to invest madly in their armed forces, not only to displace Socialist Russia, but also to not make the same mistakes!

    • @hamzamahmood9565
      @hamzamahmood9565 Рік тому +91

      ​@@doncomuna378 Losing the political will to fight is not same as an outright military defeat. America decided it was worth keeping Japan, S.Korea and Western Europe after WW2, so we stayed. America decided it wasn't worth keeping Vietnam, Afghanistan or Iraq, so we left.

  • @user-sy1ei5mn2l
    @user-sy1ei5mn2l Рік тому +205

    I love how accurate the flags are

    • @tintin323
      @tintin323 Рік тому +18

      Is this ironic ?

    • @cloroxbleach9222
      @cloroxbleach9222 Рік тому +30

      There are inaccuracies, the Ottoman Empire is it the most obvious one and another one is Austria-Hungary which more commonly used the black and gold flag Habsburg flag.
      It's still a lot better than other videos which just use modern flags and names though.

    • @yeetienusmagnus4460
      @yeetienusmagnus4460 Рік тому +12

      bruh wtf happened to the Belgian flag

    • @Naiko-tekinaShinjukukumin
      @Naiko-tekinaShinjukukumin Рік тому +5

      Japan's Flag during it's empire is inaccurate. The flag shown there is the Imperial Japanese Army and Navy flags. It is still used today. The corrrect flag is the same flag as modern Japan.

    • @asdasasada722
      @asdasasada722 Рік тому

      @@tintin323 weimar republic = germany for example..it isnt

  • @randallidell7027
    @randallidell7027 Рік тому +184

    It's crazy how quickly the US can dwarf other nations in military spending when we gear up for war.

    • @Messerschmitt_BF_109G_10
      @Messerschmitt_BF_109G_10 Рік тому +19

      In just 10 seconds, 1:28 - 1:38, we went from like $140,000,000 to $2.3 BILLION

    • @brettk9316
      @brettk9316 Рік тому +31

      🇺🇸 💪 being rich helps 🤑 💰

    • @T.Hebert
      @T.Hebert Рік тому +12

      @@Messerschmitt_BF_109G_10 A civil war does that to you I guess

    • @AndrewJ9673
      @AndrewJ9673 Рік тому +18

      one of the difficult questions in history is when specifically the United States became a Great Power and when they became a "Superpower". I usually look at the history of the Civil War and argue that if there was ever a point where the US was considered one of the strongest countries on Earth, then it must be before the Civil War, because the amount mobilized for a *civil war* and not even a war against another major power was insane, and dwarfs a lot of the rest of the world.

    • @TheJollyKraut
      @TheJollyKraut Рік тому

      @@brettk9316 You aren't rich. It's all bought with debts. Debts that your grandchildren will have to pay off...

  • @Ltasty
    @Ltasty Рік тому +185

    Would also be interesting to see this adjusted with PPP. In US dollars alone it doesn't give a true representation of military expenditure. China and Russia's for example is likely at least double when you consider PPP.

    • @matrioxraven1929
      @matrioxraven1929 Рік тому +8

      Se hace en dolares para ver el gasto real de todos por igual

    • @AbdulGoodLooks
      @AbdulGoodLooks Рік тому +61

      I totally agree, but Purchasing Power Parity is calculated using consumer goods.
      It doesn't really tell us how much cheaper military equipment, personnel, and research are for other countries vs the US.
      We would probably need a different metric to properly compare them.

    • @Ltasty
      @Ltasty Рік тому +14

      @@AbdulGoodLooks you're still going to get a far better representation using PPP than you are merely using dollars.

    • @marcusgarveyson
      @marcusgarveyson Рік тому

      🇺🇸 military spending is equal to money laundering . it hasn't made the us military 10x more powerful than Afghanistan a country thats not even in the top 10

    • @Aduysvmncmkouyf
      @Aduysvmncmkouyf Рік тому

      @@Ltasty gdp

  • @stevejones4010
    @stevejones4010 Рік тому +27

    Brilliant video and music as always, thanks 👍

  • @dylanhoeltzel
    @dylanhoeltzel Рік тому +371

    Soviet Union:OK usa I'm out you can stop spending
    Usa:Eh,no thanks
    😂😂😂😂
    Edit: Holy cow that's a lot of likes
    Edit 2:There's a war in the replies 💀

    • @danilos38
      @danilos38 Рік тому +107

      Однополярный мир полсе 1991 года , США контролировать начали всю планету в том числе за счёт баз НАТО по всему миру , а на это нужно много средств тратить . Весь мир после 1991 года колония США

    • @JimzieUSAball
      @JimzieUSAball Рік тому +62

      @@danilos38 Can’t defeat Ukraine??

    • @legocon2004
      @legocon2004 Рік тому +46

      @@danilos38 В чем дело, Иван, с ума ты проигрываешь?

    • @JoeXOTic
      @JoeXOTic Рік тому

      ​@@JimzieUSAball it's a war of attrition to the western resources. Russia can make rockets rain on ukraine if they wanted to end it.

    • @JoeXOTic
      @JoeXOTic Рік тому +13

      ​@@danilos38 true

  • @USViper
    @USViper Рік тому +41

    1943, America put a twin turbo on the defense budget and looked in rear view

    • @1blackice1
      @1blackice1 Рік тому +7

      That was when America made war into a business.

    • @USViper
      @USViper Рік тому +14

      @1blackice1 War is a business in EVERY country... there is money in war. Just like Krupp steel company ww2

    • @omniyambot9876
      @omniyambot9876 Рік тому +4

      you don't mess with a country with military industrial complex or you'll learn why they don't have healthcare for asserting freedom😁

    • @walmars3curity
      @walmars3curity 2 місяці тому

      What was it before?

  • @theIroncane
    @theIroncane 9 місяців тому +2

    The most entertaining and captivating video I've ever watched 😅

  • @richierollinrocket2891
    @richierollinrocket2891 Місяць тому +4

    US defense budget whenever there is a war: I am speed

  • @DataDiveCH
    @DataDiveCH Рік тому +4

    It was great. Keep going👍

  • @ak-12ejoyer52
    @ak-12ejoyer52 Рік тому +100

    The video is good, but it has a lot of mistakes. One of the big mistakes I've noticed is the hugely inflated country budgets for 1898, which were actually ~3 times lower than shown in the video. Also one of the big mistakes - the Russian military budget for 1994, which could not be equal to 94 billion dollars (which was more than the country's total budget for that year, lmao) and was actually about 13 billion dollars.

    • @matsi1944
      @matsi1944 Рік тому +9

      And the Belgian flag 😮🤦

    • @Alex_R88
      @Alex_R88 4 місяці тому +1

      я думаю, это все в перерасчете на сегодняшние деньги

    • @millionelectricvolts6117
      @millionelectricvolts6117 4 місяці тому +4

      ​@@Alex_R88 So, adjusted for inflation? Probably is what happened

  • @Sans_K5
    @Sans_K5 11 місяців тому +1

    thanks for making this video so wonderful❤️🔥

  • @amin368
    @amin368 5 місяців тому +10

    UK 1948: Poland what hell are you doing
    Poland: sorry I'm going back now

    • @user-nm6sp1eg5o
      @user-nm6sp1eg5o 3 місяці тому +2

      Poland was totally destroyed and had to rebuild itself without any foreign help.

    • @Septimus_ii
      @Septimus_ii 3 місяці тому +3

      @@user-nm6sp1eg5o In 1948 they had an awful lot of Soviet 'help'. Nothing from their supposed allies in the West, though :(

    • @Pospolite-Ruszenie
      @Pospolite-Ruszenie 2 місяці тому +3

      The west wanted to help, but the Soviets refuses. That’s also why Poland didn’t get any financial reparations from Germany. The Soviets didn’t allow it.

    • @koulematon7359
      @koulematon7359 2 місяці тому +2

      ​@@Septimus_iiIt was the Soviets that rejected the Marshall Plan for us. They thought Lenin magic would be enough, and it wasn't.

  • @FyL43
    @FyL43 5 місяців тому +16

    France is pretty stable all the time, but we can see that it never manages to adapt quickly enough compared to other countries

    • @Bracus.Reghusk
      @Bracus.Reghusk 5 місяців тому

      False just study the use of new equipment during the First World War.

    • @roronoazoro2970
      @roronoazoro2970 5 місяців тому +2

      @@Bracus.Reghuskhow does the implementation of new equipment in a single war have to do with their defense budget throughout the past 200 years?? You’re talking about apples when the other dude is talking about oranges 😂

    • @Bracus.Reghusk
      @Bracus.Reghusk 5 місяців тому +12

      @@roronoazoro2970 The use of new equipment come the implementation of new strategies and organisation just study This is a fascinating subject, and it shows that the French army has been at the forefront of innovation and adaptation, the basic comment is just either bad faith or ignorance.

    • @xxdarkphoenixxx1
      @xxdarkphoenixxx1 4 місяці тому +3

      @@roronoazoro2970 In fact you can learn how the french modify the army mobility between 14 and 18. They just blow away the standard of the time

  • @simonsonne4741
    @simonsonne4741 Рік тому +4

    Everyone is "war over let's stop spending so much on our military" USA: "hold my beer"

  • @sof5858
    @sof5858 Рік тому +28

    It would have been interesting to split the US with Confederacy during the Civil War.

    • @user-ti6xm4rz4f
      @user-ti6xm4rz4f 9 місяців тому +1

      лучше,чтоб америка исчезла.

    • @davidlucas5550
      @davidlucas5550 5 місяців тому +3

      ​@@user-ti6xm4rz4fЧестно говоря, вы завидуете, вы ненавидите США только потому, что они номер 1, честно говоря, я мечтаю, чтобы Россия и США заставили Китай и все остальное исчезнуть, а я бразилец, в моей стране полно коммунистов, вот таких ослов , ты знаешь? Они не такие, как Путин, который любит свою страну, люди здесь все разрушают, убивают экономику, у них нет даже хорошего военного планирования, поэтому мне бы очень хотелось быть на стороне России и США, если Если бы Трамп был у власти в США, было бы несколько соглашений, как и у них, и сделали бы больше..

    • @user-ti6xm4rz4f
      @user-ti6xm4rz4f 5 місяців тому

      @@davidlucas5550 ,вот честно,никакой зависти к Америке или еще к какой стране вообще нет у россиян,честно-всем пофиг.Пофиг,это когда безразлично,когда ты не думаешь об этом.Америка-международный бандит,страна,которая несет горе и войны по всей планете.Поэтому Америку ненавидит большая половина человечества.Кстати,в России Бразилию любят,у нас есть юмористический фильм"Здравствуйте,я ваша тетя"Там богатая тетушка приехала из Бразилии,где много диких обезьян"😁,и теперь большинство россиян так и думают,что обезьяна-ваше основное животное😁Ну а еще у вас весело,солнечно,Пеле👍

    • @davidlucas5550
      @davidlucas5550 5 місяців тому

      ​@@user-ti6xm4rz4fсмешно, ну меня не волнуют никакие обиды, честно говоря, мне кажется, что это смешно, но это правда чувак, к сожалению ничего хорошего отсюда не выходит, умные те, кто отсюда выходят.

    • @davidlucas5550
      @davidlucas5550 5 місяців тому

      @@user-ti6xm4rz4f Поэтому я сказал, что мечтаю, чтобы США и Россия покончили со всем остальным.

  • @michaelneuwirth3414
    @michaelneuwirth3414 Рік тому +43

    🇬🇧 The differentiation into the Kingdom of Prussia and Bavaria, the German Empire, the Weimar Republic, Nazi Germany, West and East Germany and since 1990 Germany for the geographical area of Germany reflects the political situation very accurately. In the case of Great Britain, on the other hand, I am simply missing the countries of the British Empire or the Commonwealth. A category NATO or Warsaw Pact would also reflect the historical events of the time more accurately. The same applies to the more than 50 states of the Ukaine Contact Group. In general, I consider the consideration of military expenditures to be much more meaningful than many other explanations for the course of history, so: Thank you for this YT video!
    🇩🇪 Die Differenzierung in Königreich Preussen und Bayern, deutsches Kaiserreich, Weimarer Republik, Nazi-Germany, West- und Ost-Deutschland und seit 1990 Deutschland für den geographischen Raum Deutschland gibt die politische Situation sehr exakt wieder. Bei Großbritannien hingegen fehlen mir schlichtweg die Länder des Britischen Empire bzw. des Commonwealth. Eine Kategorie NATO bzw. Warschauer Pakt würde das historische Zeitgeschehen ebenfalls genauer widerspiegeln. Gleiches gilt für die über 50 Staaten der Ukaine-Kontaktgruppe. Die Betrachtung von Militärausgaben halte ich generell für viel aussagekräftiger, als manch andere Erklärung für den Gang der Geschichte, deshalb: Danke für dieses YT-Video!

    • @tigerland4328
      @tigerland4328 6 місяців тому

      I think this is just for the UK not the entire British empire. Also the UK has existed since 1801 (apart from a slight name change when most of Ireland left the Union in 1922) so the term "UK" or "United Kingdom" is correct as opposed to Germany which had many names during this time frame

    • @i3lackfusion
      @i3lackfusion 2 місяці тому

      Its not flawless though, considering that nazi Germany wasn’t really a thing before 34

  • @user-hb4iw5gz7y
    @user-hb4iw5gz7y Рік тому +8

    США тратит миллионы долларов чтобы создать ручку которая пишет в космосе, а Россия тратит 10центов,и берет с собой обычный карандаш, вот и разница в расходах

    • @user-nd2vp4su5c
      @user-nd2vp4su5c Рік тому +4

      Сейчас сюда придёт какой-нибудь умник и напишет об грифеле от карандаша(что он опасен в условиях невесомости и ограниченной влажности)... Карандаши на космических станциях СССР были - восковые.
      Правда космическую ручку СССР всё-таки купил у США. Восковые карандаши пишут очень уж размыто.

  • @billyoconnell6669
    @billyoconnell6669 Рік тому +41

    Imagine if all that money was used to improve people's lives instead of destroying them

    • @RickySpanish12344
      @RickySpanish12344 Рік тому +6

      An unfortunate reality.

    • @ellidominusser1138
      @ellidominusser1138 Рік тому +2

      Impossible

    • @-Nyarlathotep
      @-Nyarlathotep Рік тому +13

      then how do you defend against ennemy with rock and stick ?

    • @MBGA123
      @MBGA123 Рік тому +9

      You have to provide security for them first

    • @ellidominusser1138
      @ellidominusser1138 Рік тому

      @@MBGA123 Well, the problem is, you don't need a 700 billion+ investment into military to protect your nation. Unless you consider invading other countries for their resources as "protecting our people"

  • @drrizzla4557
    @drrizzla4557 Рік тому +22

    just a detail but from 1852 to 1870 France was named "Second Empire" and not "Kingdom" anymore (even if the Second Empire is considered as a parliamentary monarchy)

    • @dontcare5319
      @dontcare5319 9 місяців тому

      Yeah and from 1848 to 1852 it was the second french republic

  • @eric.1948
    @eric.1948 Рік тому +5

    We need a video of total gdp towards military i think that explains more.

  • @user-vq6zu8wl1e
    @user-vq6zu8wl1e Рік тому +17

    Прекрасно❤ всё очень наглядно и ясно. Спасибо за видео!

    • @bilboriches7216
      @bilboriches7216 Рік тому

      Що тобі тут ясно, кацап? Ясно те що Україна вам ввалює гівна по самі гладни.

    • @Armmag
      @Armmag Рік тому +1

      Ясно, що русні пизда)

    • @AlexKoso
      @AlexKoso Рік тому +5

      вот именно. очень интересная ситуация.
      Почему "самая мирная страна" - СССР в 1943, 1944, 1945 годах тратила меньше, чем в 1945, 1946, 1947 годах? :)

    • @user-vq6zu8wl1e
      @user-vq6zu8wl1e Рік тому +13

      ​@@AlexKoso потому что самые светлые мозги рождаются именно в России. Например, пенициллин в США был изобретён раньше, но стоил дороже, чем впоследствии разработка пенициллина в СССР. И так - по всей остальной продукции. То же самое и сейчас - все виды нашего вооружения намного дешевле, чем во всех других странах мира. Что свидетельствует об уникальности человеческого материала в нашей самой лучшей на планете стране.

    • @AlexKoso
      @AlexKoso Рік тому +6

      @@user-vq6zu8wl1e завязывайте с нацизмом. Вам это ни к лицу :)

  • @anthony9thompson
    @anthony9thompson 11 місяців тому +3

    Why do I find this so exciting to watch ?

  • @jtjt210
    @jtjt210 11 місяців тому

    This is great and fascinating, is this military or army budget? Certain nations back in the day probably relied much more on their navy (and perhaps later, Air Force)?

    • @kospencer1
      @kospencer1 11 місяців тому +4

      I think it’s not limited to army, no way Britain spending that much money on land army in the late 19th century.

    • @jtjt210
      @jtjt210 10 місяців тому

      @@kospencer1 My thought too

  • @flankana
    @flankana Рік тому +7

    can we get a navy size comparison?

  • @user-yv1tz4jy1i
    @user-yv1tz4jy1i Рік тому +26

    Сразу понятно какая страна самая миролюбивая и демократичная😂

    • @dissensiohola8994
      @dissensiohola8994 Рік тому +4

      СССР 30-х годов, конечно. Сразу видно - стремился к миру)

    • @yuluoxianjun
      @yuluoxianjun Рік тому +1

      @@dissensiohola8994 USSR in 1930s control Mogolia to be independent from China.I dont think it is a Peaceful thing

    • @user-nd2vp4su5c
      @user-nd2vp4su5c Рік тому +12

      @@dissensiohola8994 в 30-х годах все были такие милые и пушистые. И ТОЛЬКО СТАЛИН...

  • @maximshakhov284
    @maximshakhov284 Рік тому

    Very interesting. Where have you got information about military budget amounts?

  • @gamerreloadedofficial4465
    @gamerreloadedofficial4465 11 місяців тому +8

    France hit different

  • @impastaissus1522
    @impastaissus1522 Рік тому +11

    it’s interesting that the eastern block countries also had quite a lot spent on he military during the start of cold war

    • @user-nb4vs1jh1x
      @user-nb4vs1jh1x 11 місяців тому +1

      Меня это тоже удивило, если место Чехословакии можно объяснить, у неё и так была сильная военная промышленность ещё до вм2 то, как ГДР мог столько тратить, наверно деньги советы довели.

  • @user-glg20
    @user-glg20 Рік тому +43

    Poland spends a lot of money on the army. The problem is that it is in a bad situation, because its main historical enemies (Russia and Germany) usually spend more.

    • @George_Wong
      @George_Wong Рік тому

      Germany is currently having its military rearmament stuck in their stupid bureaucracy, while Russia is being tied down by Ukraine.

    • @anonymerdude4501
      @anonymerdude4501 Рік тому +30

      We Germans are not your enemies anymore bro

    • @weaver1507
      @weaver1507 Рік тому

      Respect to Poland and god bless, Korea is in a similar situation (Japs and Chinese).

    • @vinoalvin9924
      @vinoalvin9924 Рік тому +20

      And still german control EU 😂
      Its not diffrent

    • @youareliedtobythemedia
      @youareliedtobythemedia Рік тому +6

      ​@@vinoalvin9924 they don't.

  • @UNSC117
    @UNSC117 11 місяців тому

    Thanks!

  • @drksideofthewal
    @drksideofthewal Рік тому +22

    And this is peacetime US spending. It can still skyrocket if it needs to.

    • @ellidominusser1138
      @ellidominusser1138 Рік тому

      It can still pour countless billions into pointless wars if it wants to

    • @EricChien95
      @EricChien95 Рік тому +1

      We got infinite money baby, our money are propped up by our military and other countries rely on it. If they don't want our defense well they are in trouble.

    • @ellidominusser1138
      @ellidominusser1138 Рік тому +10

      @@EricChien95 150% debt to gdp ratio 🙃

    • @dns7587
      @dns7587 Рік тому +4

      if you see the pattern most budgets spiked before empire fall!

    • @willjapheth23789
      @willjapheth23789 3 місяці тому +1

      Well the industries that make military supplies can be pretty advanced and cannot be scaled quickly, so the days of sudden military spending seem to be over, now you need a standing military big enough to support advanced industry. And rely on stock piles of weapons.

  • @Zopiexx
    @Zopiexx Рік тому +36

    5:15 No no Germany

    • @jammin5563
      @jammin5563 Рік тому +2

      HANS WHERE IS ZA PANERKAMPFWAGONS

    • @BenjaminMilekowsky
      @BenjaminMilekowsky Рік тому +1

      Nein nein nein

    • @jammin5563
      @jammin5563 Рік тому +1

      @@BenjaminMilekowsky nein nein nein say it like zist NEIN NEIN NEIN!

  • @opa_chirik
    @opa_chirik 8 місяців тому +17

    СССР после разрушительной войны на его территории; догнал США, которые на войне заработали большие деньги, получили огромное количество талантливых учёных со всего мира и стали огромнейшей силой. Уважение Сталину и всем кто участвовал в восстановлении огромной страны-победительницы.

    • @Zornyi
      @Zornyi 5 місяців тому +7

      Только вот обычный народ в ссср изза больших расходов на армию жил хцже

    • @danilhandrikin3853
      @danilhandrikin3853 5 місяців тому

      ​@@Zornyiага, настолько хуже что пробабушка хочет вернуться во времена 60 годов(вплоть до 85) до сих пор у них москвич стоит подаренный государством в отличии от пендосии где бедность достигает огромных цифр. В москве такого нет сколько в нью йорке или вашингтоне. Не было. Капиталистам этого не понять, вы только о деньгах думаете. А щас стране победительнице памятники сносят, и строят музеи о том какой сталин был тиран как в Польше, или же нарния, кхм украина, где герб ссср снесли со статуи и поставили бандеровский трезубец. Справедливость. Ага. Траты им млять.

    • @sinner6220
      @sinner6220 5 місяців тому +1

      ​@@Zornyi, и как он страдал? Приведи факты.

    • @velsark
      @velsark 5 місяців тому +3

      @@sinner6220только дурачок потребует факты в данном вопросе.

    • @BibEvgen
      @BibEvgen 5 місяців тому

      @@Zornyi Жил хуже, чем кто?
      Советские люди помнили, что сделали европейцы в СССР, поэтому вкладывались в оборону.
      Мы сегодня видим, западный гражданин после начала спец операции уже знал, кто враг, а многие Россиянине до сих пор живут в илюзиях.

  • @peterkorek-mv6rs
    @peterkorek-mv6rs Рік тому +1

    1848 Revolutionary movement in Austria and Germany, 1853 War in Crimean peninsula, 1871 French-Prussian war, 1877 Russo-Turkish war, 1905 Russo-Japanese war

  • @ahme_D20
    @ahme_D20 Рік тому

    Germany:back to back slowly👀
    The world :hah?!

  • @startledhamster
    @startledhamster 4 місяці тому +3

    Things I'm taking from this 1. Biggest USA export is war 2. Yugoslavia at one point had 7th largest military budget. No wonder west did everything it could to get rid of balkan super power. 3. Czechoslovakia, same as Yugoslavia. West doesn't like Slavic superpowers

  • @Ankitcse913
    @Ankitcse913 9 місяців тому +10

    UK's Budget decreased instantly when INDIA got Independant😂

    • @vatsal7640
      @vatsal7640 9 місяців тому

      Oh god another indian natinalist.
      You can clearly see the numbers growing, not decreasing even after India's independence

    • @priyashmukherjee
      @priyashmukherjee 8 місяців тому

      ​​@@vatsal7640OH GOD ANOTHER INDIAN HATER. PROUD TO BE AN INDIAN NATIONALIST.

    • @vatsal7640
      @vatsal7640 7 місяців тому +1

      @@priyashmukherjee cringe af. And who said I was an indian hater??

  • @gamingshowerthoughts9723
    @gamingshowerthoughts9723 4 місяці тому

    For a split second in 1990 when Germany unifies the music changes and Germany starts climbing and its like wait are we doing this again????

  • @Ankitcse913
    @Ankitcse913 9 місяців тому +5

    UK's Budget instantly Increased after capturing INDIA (which was world's 25% GDP)

    • @vatsal7640
      @vatsal7640 9 місяців тому

      Bro uk already had an massive military budget before the conquest.
      What do you think Britain was able to conquer india in the fitst place

    • @sohenmondal5471
      @sohenmondal5471 9 місяців тому +1

      @@vatsal7640 here comes the brown sepoy . This is not conlony age .

    • @vatsal7640
      @vatsal7640 9 місяців тому

      @@sohenmondal5471 here comes another indian nationalist who thinks everybody with different opinion is a sepoy.
      Bruh seriously when will you guys grow up??

    • @indiafirst3676
      @indiafirst3676 8 місяців тому +1

      ​@@vatsal7640 India back in the 19th century was divided into several kingdoms and hence it was easy to conquer fragmented kingdoms one by one which is what Brits did. Had India been unified then it would never had been directly colonized. India's situation would have been something like China in the 'Century of Humiliation'

    • @vatsal7640
      @vatsal7640 5 місяців тому

      ​​@@indiafirst3676agreed, but India would have still lost.

  • @becalelbecalelew7262
    @becalelbecalelew7262 5 місяців тому +3

    То есть по видео получается, что процентально относительно годов военные расходы СССР в довоенные годы и военные почти не отличаются? Серьёзно?

  • @jarq19
    @jarq19 Рік тому +5

    Now I understand why the People's Army of Poland was the same size (or even larger?) than the British Army at the time.

    • @epheboss6370
      @epheboss6370 4 місяці тому

      There was nothin like that

  • @ShaswataShaha
    @ShaswataShaha Рік тому +14

    Russia and France historically spend a lot on military.

  • @Romanball5677
    @Romanball5677 Рік тому +3

    Thanks for making the vedio also I change my name

  • @redragek
    @redragek Рік тому +7

    Угарнул с русско-японской войны, когда японцы быстро нарастили военный бюджет и так же быстро сократили после победы)) интересный народ японцы

    • @user-nd2vp4su5c
      @user-nd2vp4su5c Рік тому +4

      Если почитать как японцы пополняли этот бюджет, то жуть берет. Обычные японцы в порыве патриотизма продавали всю нормальную одежду(сами же после этого ходили в дешевых бумажных кимоно для покойников), своих жен и дочерей закладывали в бордели а вырученные с этого средства отдавали на нужды фронта.

    • @redragek
      @redragek Рік тому +8

      @@user-nd2vp4su5c печальное зрелище. Да и сейчас им не сладко в плане демографии

    • @user-ji8qv8em3l
      @user-ji8qv8em3l Рік тому +4

      @@redragek Хрен с мухосранска жалеет японцев 😂

    • @redragek
      @redragek Рік тому

      @@user-ji8qv8em3l 😅😂🤣🤣😂😅😝😜🤡

    • @Vedmed88
      @Vedmed88 10 місяців тому +2

      Еврейские богачи помогли, тогда в России была черта оседлости и они дали Японии денег на войну

  • @jonathanbourke305
    @jonathanbourke305 3 місяці тому

    Soviet Union: "Let's spend a lot on the military."
    Third Reich: "Hold mein Bier."
    USA: "Put down your beer and hold both of mine."

  • @commanderstorm8874
    @commanderstorm8874 2 місяці тому

    I like how you can tell whenever America was involved in a war because the defense budget would always shoot into the stratosphere

  • @pahtar7189
    @pahtar7189 Рік тому +33

    The US Civil War seems to only be represented by US spending. This either includes or ignores spending by the rebels, who should have their own bar from 1961-1865.
    Is the British spike around 1899 due to the Second Boer War?
    The Soviet budget remains high throughout the 1920s and early 1930s due to conquests and quelling rebellions.
    The Korean War didn't even show up as a blip.
    The War on Terror is done, comprising the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
    The Russian invasion of Ukraine is "-Present".

    • @Manuel_Fal_Conde
      @Manuel_Fal_Conde Рік тому +4

      Russia is not invading, but conducting a special operation. If the United States is "fighting" terror in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    • @pahtar7189
      @pahtar7189 Рік тому +15

      @@Manuel_Fal_Conde:
      The phrase "special military occupation" was coined for internal political purposes. it's an invasion.
      The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are over, and (despite being lumped into the Global War on Terror basket) only the first few years of Afghanistan were about terrorism - and none of Iraq.

    • @user-lr4vx8it6k
      @user-lr4vx8it6k 11 місяців тому +1

      US,self-proclaimed righteous war fanatic

    • @secularnevrosis
      @secularnevrosis 11 місяців тому +7

      @@pahtar7189 Well. Not to be picky. But there is a reason for calling it a "special military operation". It has to with Russian law and its constitution. Calling it a war requires total mobilization of Russia, with all the problems that is assosiated with that. War economy, rationing, universal draft of able men, turning the whole industry over to war time production etc. That would mean hard times for the economy. Say what you want about Russia, but they are *very particular* about protocol and laws.

    • @pahtar7189
      @pahtar7189 11 місяців тому

      @@secularnevrosis: I understand why Putin called it a special military operation, but it has no effect on my post. This video is about military spending and regardless of what term they use, it's an invasion that is ongoing.

  • @cmdryukarin-suki1054
    @cmdryukarin-suki1054 Рік тому +13

    When budgets work, history is made.

  • @Rockiestmage
    @Rockiestmage 2 місяці тому +1

    It's like... you can almost smell the exact second someone touched our boats

  • @Joewest2k11
    @Joewest2k11 Рік тому

    US @ 1860 "Excuse me, you mind if I scooch over. Thanks!"

  • @smonyboy
    @smonyboy Рік тому +28

    while definitely not higher than that of the US, some analysts believe china's actual military spending is understated

    • @RickySpanish12344
      @RickySpanish12344 Рік тому +16

      Very true, but I'd imagine the U.S. has black budget projects as well.

    • @smonyboy
      @smonyboy Рік тому

      @@EricChien95 The fact that you're using military bases as a means of saying the numbers for both US and China are accurate is about as accurate as your reading abilities.

    • @user-kq5pj9py9c
      @user-kq5pj9py9c Рік тому

      A Chinese military base poses a serious threat to the United States

    • @xy-inventor1885
      @xy-inventor1885 Рік тому +3

      @Ricky “you really think the US is spending 50,000 dollars on a hammer”

    • @RickySpanish12344
      @RickySpanish12344 Рік тому +5

      @@xy-inventor1885 Yeah. If a politician is taking money from the hammer company

  • @phoepyae4577
    @phoepyae4577 Рік тому +13

    Wait wait Myanmar was higher than Russia and Italy once? No way..

  • @ir0n714
    @ir0n714 11 місяців тому +1

    USA in 1991:
    *I DIDN'T HEAR NO BELL*

  • @mehmetuysal163
    @mehmetuysal163 4 місяці тому

    can you do re- calc fto inflation like 200 mil in 1880s but how much 200 mil cost in 2023?

  • @liuyuzhi
    @liuyuzhi 5 місяців тому +6

    I'm curious. Even the Qing Dynasty itself didn't know how much its military expenditure was. Where did you hear that? Did the emperor tell you this personally when you traveled back in time to 1830?

    • @tarmnv
      @tarmnv 3 місяці тому

      While I do not know the exact answer for Qing Dynasty case, but most of "spending" cases in history were taken from the book records from trading guilds. They always have a very good record about what when and how much was sold. And they've been keeping their ledgers for centuries. Similarly, some of the spending can be calculated from the known proportions. Like you've got a record from smith's guild about number of armor suits ordered. You can use this record and a knowledge about typical soldier's gear to estimate the rest of the spendings.

    • @liuyuzhi
      @liuyuzhi 3 місяці тому

      @@tarmnv Maybe you know about the guilds, but you definitely don’t know about the Qing Dynasty

  • @edududu4705
    @edududu4705 5 місяців тому +8

    Você vê que tudo está tranquilo quando o Brasil se encontra no gráfico 😅😂

  • @sysghost
    @sysghost 2 місяці тому +1

    Funny to see puny lil Sweden jumping in and out of the list as if "Hey... HEY I'm here too! Guys???"

  • @sakukullberg2697
    @sakukullberg2697 Рік тому +18

    Wow, Prussia was so efficient with its military spending.

  • @__MU_MU__
    @__MU_MU__ Рік тому +19

    The United States has more than 730 military bases around the world
    Media:Our world is threatened by Russia😂

    • @marcovidal9782
      @marcovidal9782 Рік тому

      “Our world” = NATO and Russia is still a threat although not as remotely as dangerous as China. We’re still coming off that high of being the worlds sole superpower for almost 80 years.

    • @brok1589
      @brok1589 Рік тому

      Well, it's ruled by scared dictator with 10k nukes

    • @user-ki3rb5pj6t
      @user-ki3rb5pj6t 11 місяців тому

      ​@@brok1589 6k

    • @brandonf1260
      @brandonf1260 11 місяців тому

      Mm but the US isn't the one invading it's neighbors and disrupting the economic stability of the world.

  • @parzival4159
    @parzival4159 Рік тому +3

    Полный бред, начиная с единиц измерения заканчивая фактическими противоречиями...
    Отцы автора - отличные мужики!

  • @poyloos4834
    @poyloos4834 Рік тому +1

    Someone needs to tell the US that the Cold War ended a couple decades ago. And you still get people in there saying they need to put more money into army?! It’s insane!

  • @ezekielesquivel6936
    @ezekielesquivel6936 Рік тому

    Very, very interesting

  • @HeritageStacking
    @HeritageStacking Рік тому +4

    Did not expect to see Canada on here.

    • @wewantthegoldsuckah6317
      @wewantthegoldsuckah6317 Рік тому

      Pressured by world police usa to arm up against the new world order BRICS or mainly Russia china and India

    • @Ravie3
      @Ravie3 3 місяці тому +1

      Canada, the most forgotten world power. World’s 9th largest economy, almost 40 million people, but totally forgotten as a power both now and in the past due to proximity and always being in alliance with the US and UK.

    • @HeritageStacking
      @HeritageStacking 3 місяці тому

      @Ravie3 I live in Canada I knew we had the 5th largest army in ww2 at the end. I just did not realize how powerful we are. On a side note one of indias Carriers was the HMCS Bonaventure.

  • @ddr3629
    @ddr3629 7 місяців тому +3

    Next year military, security and secret spendings in Russia are $ 140 billions. Taking into account PPP = 5 (you can buy five times more goods on one dollar in Russia), we get "effective" budget approx $700 billions which is comparable to US military spending.

    • @user-wj7uk6ln5v
      @user-wj7uk6ln5v 5 місяців тому +2

      Ну, все-таки это немного не так
      Но в принципе, Россия переориентировалась на континентальную войну
      И сейчас явно не будет более лучшей армии на континенте

    • @Septimus_ii
      @Septimus_ii 3 місяці тому

      I don't think applying ppp onto military spending is quite that simple at the best of times, and especially not to a semi-isolated economy as Russia is in 2022 and 2023. The evidence has been that Russia isn't able to get the same military effectiveness out of 1/5 the budget of the US.

  • @jillsanchez7085
    @jillsanchez7085 5 місяців тому +1

    First country to have a military budget of 1b+: Usa(1860)
    Second country to have a military budget of 1b+: Russia(1876)
    Third country to have a military budget of 1b+: United Kingdom(1898)
    Fourth country to have a military budget of 1b+: Japan(1903)
    Fifth country to have a military budget of 1b+: Germany(1903)
    Sixth Country to have a military budget of 1b+: France(1906)
    Seventh Country to have a military budget of 1b+: Austria-Hungary(1912)
    Eighth Country to have a military budget of 1b+: Italy(1935)
    Ninth country to have a military budget of 1b+: Canada(1939)
    Tenth country to have a military budget of 1b+: Australia(1942)

  • @Zoonjse
    @Zoonjse Рік тому +2

    It costs money to run million bases around the world. plus contractors are charging the US Governemnt multiples amounts on items.

  • @andersonfisica6744
    @andersonfisica6744 5 місяців тому +3

    Estou surpreedido com o poder bélico do Império do Brasil desde 1843,surreal !!

    • @Jair_RJ
      @Jair_RJ 4 місяці тому +1

      Monarquia brasileira era maravilhosa

  • @octoman_games
    @octoman_games 9 місяців тому +5

    Fascinating seeing empires rise and fall.

  • @Cruor34
    @Cruor34 Місяць тому

    Is this music from HOI 4 or is it just free use music?

  • @timminh468
    @timminh468 Місяць тому

    Now do one about national debt that would be interesting

  • @SebHaarfagre
    @SebHaarfagre Рік тому +4

    I'm surprised Canada spent so much in the early 50's. What was that, were they that active in the Korean war (I didn't know they were at all in such case, pardon to any Canadians)

    • @canadaphil6068
      @canadaphil6068 Рік тому +3

      Korean War..
      We also still used to field a very large Navy and were very active in supporting NATO with the stationing of several air force squadrons (first F86 Sabres, then Avro CF-100's) and tank brigades in Europe (mainly Centurians) in West Germany)
      To be honest, we are just a shell of what we once were.
      EDIT: Canada actually was a major contributor to the Anti-Submarine contingent of NATO in the North Atlantic during the Cold War (both Navy and Maritime Air Patrol) and also maintained 2 aircraft carriers from the 50's through 60's (but retired them both for good in early 70's)
      And of course there was the setting up of the DEW LINE and the NORAD defensive stations in tandem with the US for the defense of North America against the threat of Soviet bombers over the Arctic Circle.

    • @jamesg9468
      @jamesg9468 11 місяців тому +2

      It is sad to see the state of Canada's military today. Using frigates made in the 80s, with no plans in place to build more. Still not paying their 2% minimum obligation to NATO.

    • @willjapheth23789
      @willjapheth23789 3 місяці тому

      ​@@jamesg9468 we depend on Canada and Denmark to protect the northpole.

  • @user-vv3xe3ku1w
    @user-vv3xe3ku1w 5 місяців тому +5

    Сколько денег впустую выброшено.

  • @Zesmas
    @Zesmas Рік тому

    the funny thing is, the US military budget is 800 Billion, but they almost always spend well above that anyway, in 2022, they spent over 1 trillion dollars.

  • @a.gallardo4321
    @a.gallardo4321 11 місяців тому +1

    Where do you even get the data for the Grand Duchy of Tuscany

  • @jjthai1
    @jjthai1 Рік тому +7

    For a country that "doesn't have army", Japan sure do spend a lot.

    • @masterchief2402
      @masterchief2402 Рік тому +3

      What Japan never claimed they don’t have an army. In fact in 2022 Japan stated they are remilitarizing the nation and seeking more U.S technology and aircraft.

    • @ernestogastelum9123
      @ernestogastelum9123 Рік тому +2

      @@masterchief2402 Japan did claim they dont have army and they only had a defensive force until they decided to change in 2022.

    • @masterchief2402
      @masterchief2402 Рік тому

      @@ernestogastelum9123 yeah because under the treaty they signed they were allowed to have a defence force only after ww2

    •  Рік тому

      Technically, they didn't claim anything. Their Constitution did so. And their Constitution is a US forced Constitution for obvious reasons.

    • @Har1ByWorld
      @Har1ByWorld 5 місяців тому

      @@masterchief2402 SO THEY DID CLAIM THEY DONT HAVE AN ARMY

  • @nicolaspeigne1429
    @nicolaspeigne1429 Рік тому +11

    I guess having the power to be totally in debt but still spend massive amounts of money inflated the numbers in modern times

    • @SebHaarfagre
      @SebHaarfagre Рік тому +5

      In modern times?
      Standing armies is a relatively new thing, before that, countries bankrupted themselves thrice over using mercenaries (and sometimes benefited in the long run)

    • @nicolaspeigne1429
      @nicolaspeigne1429 Рік тому +3

      @@SebHaarfagre except countries were actually expected to pay their debt back, and since their currency was based on the amount of gold they actually had, they couldn't borrow that much when they were bankrupted

    • @ni9274
      @ni9274 Рік тому +2

      It doesn’t matter that you’re in debt if you can pay the rate

    • @lred1383
      @lred1383 Рік тому

      build up a big enough army and you ascend past the global economy, because you can simply not pay your bills and they can't take the money from you. They'll actually be paying you to keep to yourself

  • @Ow3nsdashing-zz3zt
    @Ow3nsdashing-zz3zt 3 місяці тому +2

    I Wonder why mexico and usa went up at the same time💀

  • @TheDanielprze
    @TheDanielprze 2 місяці тому

    Where is Poland? 26mld EUR 2022... based on which data you prepared this dynamic chart?😮

  • @paradiseparrots1849
    @paradiseparrots1849 Рік тому +4

    India came in battlefield after the independence from Britishers in 1947 ❤️🤗🇮🇳

    • @mayankkumar1837
      @mayankkumar1837 Рік тому +1

      BJP ke ate hi 2014 se sidhe 3rd position

    • @amasing115
      @amasing115 11 місяців тому +2

      In 1984 the indians military spending can be seen increasing, this is due to India brutally suppressing Sikhs during the 80s and 90s. During this time, Congress directly ruled Punjab instead of through a middle man which is how it is for all other provinces, a move that resembles a totalitarian state.

    • @SUNNYDAY-if8yo
      @SUNNYDAY-if8yo 11 місяців тому +2

      ​@@amasing115 🤡 logic lol

    • @keralanaturelover196
      @keralanaturelover196 5 місяців тому

      ​@@amasing115waste of money😢😢

  • @KrauserAMG
    @KrauserAMG 8 місяців тому +268

    Russia's army budget is several times smaller than that of the United States, but at the same time Russia holds the status of the 2nd army in the world in power. Just imagine what Russia would do with the US budget 💀

    • @undefined7704
      @undefined7704 8 місяців тому +61

      ты же понимаешь что она считаеться второй армией мира из-за количества населения и ядерного оружия в первую очередь ?

    • @KrauserAMG
      @KrauserAMG 8 місяців тому +68

      @@undefined7704 ну вообще запад очень часто восхищался своей техникой и постоянно говорил как она сокрушит Россию при войне, тем самым пытаясь поставить Россию "на место" . А оказалось, что дорогая техника запада не справляется с дешёвыми, немного улучшенными танками СССР. А если говорить про дисциплину то в России она очевидно лучше. Ядерные ракеты ты вообще можешь не включать в военную силу, их все равно никто не применит.

    • @affdafwfwa
      @affdafwfwa 5 місяців тому +140

      2nd army in the world in power yet can't even win against Ukraine LMFAO

    • @WUNDER_BUILDER
      @WUNDER_BUILDER 5 місяців тому +91

      ​@@affdafwfwawithout NATO help, Ukrain would lost in month. Without starlink and NATO satellits and artillery and ect, they cant defeat Russia

    • @Ya_Tut_Ne_Pri_Chem
      @Ya_Tut_Ne_Pri_Chem 5 місяців тому +41

      @@affdafwfwa I could be wrong, but the entire Russian army is not at war with Ukraine, only part of the 2nd army of the world is located there

  • @eltomas0709
    @eltomas0709 Рік тому

    de donde sacan esta información???

  • @Nrwspg
    @Nrwspg 11 місяців тому +1

    Germany til 1990: panzer goes brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr (i know there weren’t tanks till ww1)
    Germany since 1990: bye bye

  • @Asfgjjgdtyuir
    @Asfgjjgdtyuir Рік тому +5

    Интересно как считали бюджет раньше без интернета телефона, все секретно, королевство и т.д.

    • @toptroll7264
      @toptroll7264 Рік тому

      По этому графику я понял, что правители это куры, кто то единовременно подбрасывает в определенный курятник еду, в курятник, который выгодно подбрасывать на данном этапе. А жратву кидают инвесторы

  • @te-bo7618
    @te-bo7618 11 місяців тому

    i cant seem to find any solid data before 1950 on military spending data either expenditure as a share of GDP or annual budget etc. idk where the person got this data from but it couldn't have been SIPRI Milex.

  • @alexeivoloshin5984
    @alexeivoloshin5984 3 місяці тому

    How did you convert USSR spending into dollars?

  • @galinrashkov7645
    @galinrashkov7645 Рік тому +11

    After the 2010s there is no explainable reason for USA to hold so high military budget. Compared to the others, they could easily half it.

    • @fivegiga5523
      @fivegiga5523 Рік тому +1

      @Galin Rashkov@ And you will guarantee bad boy Pootinkov won't do anything against us ? ? ?

    • @galinrashkov7645
      @galinrashkov7645 Рік тому +12

      @@fivegiga5523 This kind of mindset leads to the world problems. If everybody is afraid of it's neighbours, tension will rise

    • @lalibellahorne
      @lalibellahorne Рік тому +1

      Hm, with crazy ape like rasha, you've got to be alert.

    • @Niggaihate
      @Niggaihate Рік тому +1

      alot of it doesnt really go the armed forces

    • @night_surfer5818
      @night_surfer5818 Рік тому +1

      USA preparing for another invasion coz money 💸💸🤑🤑

  • @le3le8
    @le3le8 9 місяців тому +3

    It's just that Gorbachev came to power just in 1985 and America bought him, he decided to destroy the Union. Since then, everything has gone downhill. He himself did not begin to live in destroyed Russia, the remnants of the empire that he destroyed, preferred to live and go to another world in Germany. Yeltsin has more conscience and honor, although he began to abuse alcohol, he tried to correct what Gorbachev left him, it was Yeltsin who recommended Putin to the West, for which we thank him!

    • @willjapheth23789
      @willjapheth23789 3 місяці тому

      How did Gorbachev convince so many soviet republics to leave in just 5 years? Wow that's really impressive.

    • @adambalog7432
      @adambalog7432 20 днів тому +1

      Oh yes Putin. Such a great guy. He wouldnt start a war. Right?