Very useful for remrev po! I stumbled upon this video by accident. I'm from XU law and I find this very easy to understand. will definitely check out the cases. :)
Thank You for this video Ma'am, I am currently reviewing for the upcoming bar exam this November, and I find this video of yours very easy to understand different kinds of writs. 💖
@@oliverose7 My most immediate concern is for several environmental activists who are being detained arbitrarily here in Mongolia. We are in the process of engaging the UN working group on arbitrary detention to secure their release. But I thought that habeas corpus might also be a viable avenue. I am told that Mongolian law does not provide relief through habeas corpus. I suggested that we try it anyway--simply go ahead and petition the court for a writ of habeas corpus. Maybe it's worth a shot. What is your opinion? They have not been charged with anything and it's clear that this would be a 1st amendment issue in the US.
But then again, you might be introducing it as an innovative remedy. I remember when amparo was first introduced here, there was no law. Petitioner relied on international law.
@@oliverose7 Thank you for the insight and encouragement. It looks like we will go in this direction. Amparo is also very interesting to me in the context of the situation here. These remedies need to be understood and adopted in order to guarantee greater civility.
Hi Gabrielle. Thanks for your question. On 2:11 I was making a distinction between guardianship over a minor and guardianship over a person who is deemed legally "incompetent" although not a minor. Sorry I spoke in English and Tagalog, assuming that all my listeners understand Tagalog. Thanks for watching my video.
@@easylawonline Ma'am, good pm! Is the regular rules of procedure already applicable to cases governed by Rules on Summary Procedure when appealed to the RTC? If yes, does it also mean that Motion for Recon is no longer a prohibited pleading once the case reaches the RTC?
@@sedd957 Hello. The applicable rule is now Rules on Expedited Procedures in the First Level Courts (A.M. No. 08-8-7-SC). See sc.judiciary.gov.ph/25687/ If you look at Part C number 2, the RTC's judgment on the appeal in summary cases is final, unappealable and executory. It does not say that a motion for reconsideration is prohibited. I would take this to mean that a motion for reconsideration is NOT allowed because the decision on appeal is FINAL.
![[Civil Procedure] Modes of discovery under Rules 23-29 of the Philippine Rules of Court](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/is_nlKciTlM/mqdefault.jpg)
![[Civil Procedure] Modes of discovery under Rules 23-29 of the Philippine Rules of Court](/img/tr.png)
![[Civil Procedure] Pre-trial in civil cases, Rule 18 of the Rules of Court (Video7)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QjjHFgwFUPE/mqdefault.jpg)
As a criminology student, very helpful po nito para mas lalong maintindihan ang report ko po.
Thanks for added explanation
Thank you so much Nel.
thank you very much prof....God bless !!!
Very useful for remrev po! I stumbled upon this video by accident. I'm from XU law and I find this very easy to understand. will definitely check out the cases. :)
Thank you so much.
Thank You for this video Ma'am, I am currently reviewing for the upcoming bar exam this November, and I find this video of yours very easy to understand different kinds of writs. 💖
Happy to help.
I still remember our discussions about this in our Spec. Pro class. Maraming salamat po for this video ma'am!
You're welcome 😊
Thank you professor. Very well explained po. So easy to understand.
Thank you for your very encouraging words.
Thank you Atty
Thanks. What other topics would you like me to discuss in my videos?
Thank you ma'am!
Welcome!
Thanks for the concise and informative discussion, maam!
You are so much welcome :) I will be uploading more videos soon, so remember to subscribe.
Thank you.
wow very useful thank you prof
Glad to hear that
Excellent presentation! Extremely helpful!
Thank you. Are there topics on civil procedure that you'd want me to discuss ?
@@oliverose7 My most immediate concern is for several environmental activists who are being detained arbitrarily here in Mongolia. We are in the process of engaging the UN working group on arbitrary detention to secure their release. But I thought that habeas corpus might also be a viable avenue. I am told that Mongolian law does not provide relief through habeas corpus. I suggested that we try it anyway--simply go ahead and petition the court for a writ of habeas corpus. Maybe it's worth a shot. What is your opinion? They have not been charged with anything and it's clear that this would be a 1st amendment issue in the US.
UN working group on arbitrary detention is the way to go. If HC is not a legal remedy, I don't think there can be any relief.
But then again, you might be introducing it as an innovative remedy.
I remember when amparo was first introduced here, there was no law. Petitioner relied on international law.
@@oliverose7 Thank you for the insight and encouragement. It looks like we will go in this direction. Amparo is also very interesting to me in the context of the situation here. These remedies need to be understood and adopted in order to guarantee greater civility.
💖
Good day prof, Can I ask a copy of your lecture po? ang galing niyo po mag discuss. God bless Atty.
Atty. Kapag po ba ang PDL eh nka served n ng maximum sentence tapos di p din po nakakalaya pwd n po b mag file ng writ of habeas corpus?
Pwede, pero before filing the petition, why don't you write a letter first? Baka naman na overlook lang.
What is she saying at 2:11?
Hi Gabrielle. Thanks for your question. On 2:11 I was making a distinction between guardianship over a minor and guardianship over a person who is deemed legally "incompetent" although not a minor. Sorry I spoke in English and Tagalog, assuming that all my listeners understand Tagalog. Thanks for watching my video.
Thank you really for this! Ang galing niyo, Prof.
Welcome!
@@easylawonline Ma'am, good pm! Is the regular rules of procedure already applicable to cases governed by Rules on Summary Procedure when appealed to the RTC? If yes, does it also mean that Motion for Recon is no longer a prohibited pleading once the case reaches the RTC?
@@sedd957 Hello. The applicable rule is now Rules on Expedited Procedures in the First Level Courts (A.M. No. 08-8-7-SC). See sc.judiciary.gov.ph/25687/ If you look at Part C number 2, the RTC's judgment on the appeal in summary cases is final, unappealable and executory. It does not say that a motion for reconsideration is prohibited. I would take this to mean that a motion for reconsideration is NOT allowed because the decision on appeal is FINAL.
@@easylawonline thank you, Prof!
@@easylawonline I got it na. Thank you!
🪙📏⚖️