Solving a Log Equation with Different Bases

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 77

  • @MrLidless
    @MrLidless 2 роки тому +27

    Convert the equation to natural logs:
    lnx / ln5 = 2ln5 / lnx
    (lnx)² = 2(ln5)²
    x = 5^±√2

  • @PinkPastelShark
    @PinkPastelShark Рік тому +9

    When using change of base, you can save some steps by changing everything to log base 5 instead of a generic log so you can keep the LHS as one log

  • @Vash-hf2fb
    @Vash-hf2fb Рік тому +2

    I am not good at math, so I watch these videos to learn. Hopefully I get better.

  • @lollmao9541
    @lollmao9541 Рік тому +6

    Best way to do it
    Log 5 (x) = log x (25)
    Log 5 (x) = 2 log x (5)
    Log 5 (x) = 2 / log 5 (x)
    [(og 5 (x)]² = 2
    Log 5 (x) = 2
    X = 5^√2

  • @Phoenix-nh9kt
    @Phoenix-nh9kt 2 роки тому +54

    I solved it in my head in a few seconds

    • @davidseed2939
      @davidseed2939 2 роки тому +9

      me too, but i always forget the negative sqrt

    • @somebody.1026
      @somebody.1026 Рік тому +2

      😂😂😂😂

    • @plamenpenchev262
      @plamenpenchev262 Рік тому +1

      So did I but I missed x = 5^(-sqrt(2)). Logarithms are very important for Analytical Chemistry and I, as a chemist, must teach students because our mathematicians usually miss this material.

    • @rajatkumar1600
      @rajatkumar1600 Рік тому

      Me too

    • @okohsamuel314
      @okohsamuel314 Рік тому +2

      @Phoenix ... But how do u prove that to people ... I mean we are not inside ur head🙄...so just how true is ur claim?🤔 ... 😂😂😂

  • @tbg-brawlstars
    @tbg-brawlstars 2 роки тому +4

    x=5^(±√2)
    I did in mind in 10 seconds!!!

  • @cesarrocha3647
    @cesarrocha3647 Рік тому +1

    There is a small error at the 2nd method

  • @mathswan1607
    @mathswan1607 2 роки тому +2

    X=5^(sqrt(2)) or 5^(-sqrt(2))

  • @ardiris2715
    @ardiris2715 2 роки тому +3

    Of course, in actual practice, solutions are NEVER this practical. Mathematicians have it easy; people's lives aren't at stake.
    Have a nice day. (:

    • @SyberMath
      @SyberMath  2 роки тому

      Thanks! You, too!
      We're in the entertainment business 😜😁

  • @j.r.1210
    @j.r.1210 2 роки тому +2

    I think the simplest approach is to use the change of base formula, but applied only to the right-hand side of the equation. Just convert it to log[5]25/log[5]x. Then cross-multiplying, etc., leads straight to the answer.

    • @BurgoYT
      @BurgoYT 2 роки тому

      Agree

    • @SyberMath
      @SyberMath  2 роки тому

      How?

    • @Rosee45
      @Rosee45 Рік тому

      Yeah...
      I Changed the base
      Easily i got the answer

  • @stratosleounakis2267
    @stratosleounakis2267 Рік тому

    If we logarithmize whith a base of 5, a shorter solution is obtained.
    LOG X(5) = LOG 25(X) , LOG X(5) = LOG 25(5) / LOG X(5)
    LOG X(5) . LOG X(5) = 2 .....

  • @mdatik5517
    @mdatik5517 Рік тому

    It's a very simple equation for solving in head.That:
    Logx/log5=log25/logx
    or,(logx)^2=2(log5)^2
    or,logx=√2log5,-√2log5
    or,x=5^√2,5^-√2
    or,x=

  • @LIMPOPOJET
    @LIMPOPOJET 9 місяців тому

    I changed all baaes to base 5 and I got my answer write

  • @Kire.riii.
    @Kire.riii. Рік тому

    I couldn't understand why 2log5's 2 become root 2 in next line's square...why not instead of 2???

  • @owlsmath
    @owlsmath 2 роки тому +2

    that was great! 😍 i think i did a 4th method but pretty close to method 1. Awesome video

  • @temujnbn9456
    @temujnbn9456 Рік тому

    I made up this equation but I don't know how to solve it
    Equation:
    logx(5x)=2x/5
    Answer: 5

  • @ytlongbeach
    @ytlongbeach 11 місяців тому

    i naturally went straight to the 2nd method. i'm a "change of base" kinda guy.

  • @jim2376
    @jim2376 Рік тому

    I used change of base with 5 as the base. Led to the same result, 5^(+/-√2)

  • @damirdukic
    @damirdukic 2 роки тому

    As soon as I saw the problem, I immediately went with the 3rd method, since it's practically the most obvious one.
    The other two methods seem unnecessarily convoluted to me.

  • @SuperYoonHo
    @SuperYoonHo Рік тому +1

    Thank you!!!

  • @vladimirkaplun5774
    @vladimirkaplun5774 2 роки тому +1

    Next video: can you solve x=1?

    • @SyberMath
      @SyberMath  2 роки тому

      Nope.
      Solve x-1=0 or x-1=x 😁😜

    • @vladimirkaplun5774
      @vladimirkaplun5774 2 роки тому +1

      @@SyberMath There are so many nice tasks and you are quite creative in them. Why do you select
      trivial ones?

    • @vladimirkaplun5774
      @vladimirkaplun5774 2 роки тому

      @@SyberMath For you from Sivashinsky text book
      x^4+(x+1)(5x^2-6x-6)=0
      The author's solution is quite unobvious

  • @GirishManjunathMusic
    @GirishManjunathMusic 2 роки тому +1

    Given:
    log_5 (x) = log_x (25)
    To find:
    x
    Using change-of-base:
    log(x)/log(5) = log(25)/log(x)
    As log(x) ≠ 0 by definition:
    (log(x))² = (log(25))·(log(5))
    Using log(a²) = 2log(a):
    (log(x))² = 2·(log(5))·(log(5))
    (log(x))² = 2·(log(5))²
    log(x) = ± √2·log(5)
    log(x) = log(5↑(±√2))
    Taking both sides to the power of 10:
    x = 5↑(±√2)

  • @rob876
    @rob876 Рік тому

    ln x / ln 5 = 2 ln 5 / ln x
    (ln x)^2 = 2 (ln 5)^2
    ln x = ±√2 ln 5
    x = 5^(±√2)

  • @rakenzarnsworld2
    @rakenzarnsworld2 2 роки тому

    x = 5^(sqrt)

  • @mehulpunia6174
    @mehulpunia6174 Рік тому

    it's 5^√2

  • @kalimbesk4379
    @kalimbesk4379 Рік тому

    hocam türkiyeden böyle bir içeriği ingilizce dilinde aktarmanıza bayıldım.. tebrik ederim

    • @SyberMath
      @SyberMath  Рік тому

      Tesekkur ederim! 🥰

    • @kalimbesk4379
      @kalimbesk4379 Рік тому

      @@SyberMath rica ederim hocam. Türkçe kanalınız varsa onu da takip etmek isterim

  • @abioyebolanle7911
    @abioyebolanle7911 7 місяців тому

    Solve loga 27 + logb 4 = 5

  • @angelamusiemangela
    @angelamusiemangela Рік тому

    5

  • @ប៊ុតធិធនិន
    @ប៊ុតធិធនិន 2 роки тому +1

    Hello teacher 🙏

  • @scottleung9587
    @scottleung9587 2 роки тому

    I used substitution.

  • @feerien
    @feerien Рік тому

    yes I can.

  • @vuqou2664
    @vuqou2664 2 роки тому

    Yeeeee

  • @vishnuacharya6352
    @vishnuacharya6352 Рік тому

    Confusing!

  • @tonymaric3235
    @tonymaric3235 2 роки тому

    I did it in about ten seconds

  • @giuseppemalaguti435
    @giuseppemalaguti435 2 роки тому

    X=5^(sqrt2),x=5^(-sqrt2)

  • @morteza3268
    @morteza3268 2 роки тому

    NICE🙂

  • @marzipanhoplite17
    @marzipanhoplite17 2 роки тому

    Not any substitution needed,nor any reciprocal rule,flipping etc. The second method is simple and perfect as well

  • @MichaelJamesActually
    @MichaelJamesActually 2 роки тому

    One of these days I'll remember that square roots can also be negative...

    • @SyberMath
      @SyberMath  2 роки тому +3

      There are two numbers whose square equals a certain positive number. That's why (or should I say y) 😁

    • @MichaelJamesActually
      @MichaelJamesActually 2 роки тому

      thank you! I always forget the smaller of them.

  • @patricianorris8997
    @patricianorris8997 2 роки тому

    Isn’t loga x logb=log(a+b) ???

  • @RAG981
    @RAG981 2 роки тому +1

    It seemed pretty obvious to use log5basex was i/logxbase5, so I did not need your first two methods. Thanks.

  • @elmurazbsirov7617
    @elmurazbsirov7617 2 роки тому

    Çox gözəl həll etdiniz.Bakıdan salamlar.