Feasibility - Revit Site and Planning Controls (Part 1)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 28

  • @nebiatsentayehu5303
    @nebiatsentayehu5303 4 роки тому +1

    wow I like the outputs, didn't expect such a nice product at the end especially the 3D graphical representations, thanks again

  • @__esrakorkmaz__
    @__esrakorkmaz__ 3 роки тому +1

    Greetings from Turkey :) your videos are too informative, thanks for sharing.

    • @AussieBIMGuru
      @AussieBIMGuru  3 роки тому +1

      You're welcome! Always nice to know they get around the world :)

  • @raywilkinson8172
    @raywilkinson8172 5 років тому +1

    I like your use of object styles for phasing.

    • @AussieBIMGuru
      @AussieBIMGuru  5 років тому +4

      Thanks! Much easier for rough/basic models like this where shortcuts wont damage the BIM model too much

  • @liu5916416
    @liu5916416 5 років тому

    Really good tutorial, I did feasibility massing this week, and learn much tips from your tutorial. I wish I could watch some other different stages tutuorials, like from feasibility study-concept design-DA-Construction Documentations. As a graduate, I won't fear do something new after watching your tutorials, really helps. Thx mate.

    • @AussieBIMGuru
      @AussieBIMGuru  5 років тому

      Thanks so much, glad the videos are giving you the confidence heading into your next career stage!
      The later design stages are difficult to learn in video format, however I will likely tailor some documentation focused tutorials at a later date such as how to set up a partitions set out plan, manage a coordination RCP etc.
      Overall, those skills will come to you as a graduate with time and project experience mostly - if ever you need some advice for any of these stages happy to help via email :)

  • @hadzrayarchitecture
    @hadzrayarchitecture 3 роки тому +2

    yo dood you are a life saver. coffee on me when i come down to sydney

  • @DanR57
    @DanR57 5 років тому +1

    Thanks for sharing your tips ! It's helping me a lot :)
    Despite my level of English, you're clear
    ++

    • @AussieBIMGuru
      @AussieBIMGuru  5 років тому

      That's great Daniel, thanks for the support!

  • @myathtooaung2582
    @myathtooaung2582 4 роки тому +1

    Thanks for these very helpful tutorials. How did you associated the subcategory parameter drop down with VG Generic Model subcategory @28:15

    • @AussieBIMGuru
      @AussieBIMGuru  4 роки тому +1

      Under manage 》object styles I added some subcategories to generic models.

    • @myathtooaung2582
      @myathtooaung2582 4 роки тому +1

      @@AussieBIMGuru I got to that point, but under the Identity Data of the massing, there is no parameter called Subcategory.

    • @AussieBIMGuru
      @AussieBIMGuru  4 роки тому +1

      @@myathtooaung2582 make sure you added it under massing if you are in this category.

    • @myathtooaung2582
      @myathtooaung2582 4 роки тому +1

      Aussie BIM Guru my bad! I needed to be in “edit in place” to see that Subcategory option. Before I just selected the Model in place and not seeing the parameter. :)

  • @MrDrenahmeti
    @MrDrenahmeti 2 роки тому

    Hi Gavin, really nice tutorial as always. Just one question, would it be possible or maybe to reiterate my question, could we do this only with object styles? I mean not use Design Option but just setup object styles as you need for generic and massing categories. Would we be able to generate the visuals and also the data from them the same as you did? Thank you, appreciate your time!

    • @AussieBIMGuru
      @AussieBIMGuru  2 роки тому

      Yes you could do it that way, although it's more of a layer based approach so at odds with the tools available I'd say.

    • @MrDrenahmeti
      @MrDrenahmeti 2 роки тому +1

      @@AussieBIMGuru Understandable, thank you for the prompt reply!

  • @0xMeddler
    @0xMeddler Рік тому

    hello ! why did you create a DATUM level instead of just elevating the base point to 65m? that way you could keep the levels realistic for the next steps of the project, no?

    • @AussieBIMGuru
      @AussieBIMGuru  Рік тому +1

      Main reason is that if the project changes in height we can just push survey point and datum level down instead of having to move the entire model up.

    • @iumepock
      @iumepock 11 місяців тому

      @@AussieBIMGuru but what if you're doing a project at a high elevation site? I'm not sure how far away from internal origin you must be for graphics start to glitch, but wouldn't it be saffer if you unclip the survey point, assign a elevation close enough, and then create the Datum level bellow? Let's say your project is 852,45m over sea level. You could assing 850m to the survey point, move access level to the desired elevation (2,45m up) and create Datum level 850m bellow the Survey Point. It bugs my mind to keep the Survey Point and the PBP far away from the building.

    • @AussieBIMGuru
      @AussieBIMGuru  11 місяців тому

      Yes you could do this also for a high elevation site too, although keep in mind a lot of CAD files are set to z =0 is RL = 0 so I'd make datum level at 0 always. At the end of the day relativity is the key so either specifying survey point at 0 or a specific value can achieve the same goal.
      Revit has a roughly 14km window it works within so generally you wont get errors for a while if you're elevated somewhat.

  • @JamesHillegas
    @JamesHillegas 4 роки тому +1

    3:50 can you use drones for this?

    • @AussieBIMGuru
      @AussieBIMGuru  4 роки тому +1

      Yeah whatever returns a viable format for referencing in Revit suits a site modelling workflow. Could be point cloud from drone/lidar.

  • @ashrafulalam7862
    @ashrafulalam7862 4 роки тому

    Hei i am from melbourne is there anyway that i could get some lesson.

    • @AussieBIMGuru
      @AussieBIMGuru  4 роки тому

      Hi Ash, feel free to submit a ticket to my business. I offer 1 on 1 sessions via web (paid).
      www.bimguru.com.au