6 Types of Movie Scientists

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1 тис.

  • @AndrewDotsonvideos
    @AndrewDotsonvideos  4 роки тому +1690

    Hahaha you know what be so weird? If you shared the video hahaha jk. OMG I can't believe you're doing this you're crazy!

    • @geometrydashlaser4301
      @geometrydashlaser4301 4 роки тому +101

      Andrew Dotson JK unless?

    • @AndrewDotsonvideos
      @AndrewDotsonvideos  4 роки тому +98

      @@geometrydashlaser4301 I'm only kidding if you're kidding

    • @Patrick-vy6pp
      @Patrick-vy6pp 4 роки тому +10

      @@AndrewDotsonvideos Maybe you are not kidding and you are in the same moment.

    • @geometrydashlaser4301
      @geometrydashlaser4301 4 роки тому +5

      Andrew Dotson I’m not kidding, just don’t tell my parents 😳😳

    • @Bricknick98
      @Bricknick98 4 роки тому +32

      Hey Andrew! Thought it would be cool to let you know that I just accepted admission to go to your school for my PhD in Physics!

  • @murtazahiraj451
    @murtazahiraj451 4 роки тому +3346

    you forget the guy who at the age of 22 got 5 PhDs across all the natural sciences who saves the day "nerd magic" and has a B plot romance around his mandatory social awkwardness

    • @amitchakraborty6230
      @amitchakraborty6230 4 роки тому +4

      😂😂

    • @bipinbiharisharma2271
      @bipinbiharisharma2271 4 роки тому +3

      Good one bruh/sistsh

    • @spacedoutorca4550
      @spacedoutorca4550 4 роки тому +31

      Isn’t that essentially the show Numbers?

    • @simplicitas5113
      @simplicitas5113 4 роки тому +54

      As a European I am amazed North America promotes PhDs who skipped their master. "oh it makes sense they can focus on research" Yeah, and miss out on all basic science outside of their project. Whatever.

    • @Ninjaananas
      @Ninjaananas 4 роки тому +20

      Someone with that many PhDs had no time to develope social skills.

  • @benedictspinoza1025
    @benedictspinoza1025 4 роки тому +5204

    U forgot the 'insert quantum gibberish' to explain why there's a flying spaghetti monster in space

    • @liammargetts
      @liammargetts 4 роки тому +186

      This was one of the biggest problems with antman, especially the quantum realm, that just doesn't make sense

    • @deathstroke8639
      @deathstroke8639 4 роки тому +106

      It's funny because they just begin saying a bunch a big terms expecting that by doing so they suddenly figured the answered.

    • @subinmdr
      @subinmdr 4 роки тому +197

      Like eigenvalue of a mobius strip?

    • @SangerZonvolt
      @SangerZonvolt 4 роки тому +107

      He also forgot the crazy evil scientist who deliberately takes the path with the most ethical resistance for no good reason.

    • @medchs
      @medchs 4 роки тому +9

      @@subinmdr lmao 😂

  • @vicentedillon4885
    @vicentedillon4885 4 роки тому +3709

    You forgot the reluctant scientist that swore never to do science again after an experiment went wrong years ago

    • @pv10t
      @pv10t 4 роки тому +40

      Hank pim you got there

    • @Thezocraticmethod
      @Thezocraticmethod 4 роки тому +9

      this made laugh lmao !

    • @ertvonzukonigvonrahm835
      @ertvonzukonigvonrahm835 4 роки тому +111

      I was a scientist like you but on one fatefull day i shot an arrow and hit someones knee...
      Now i am nologer able to be a scientist because of the guilt ....
      And because i am wanted criminal

    • @CarbonDioxide.
      @CarbonDioxide. 4 роки тому +7

      @@ertvonzukonigvonrahm835 Nice reference.

    • @coins_png
      @coins_png 4 роки тому +14

      I was a scientist until I took an arrow to the knee

  • @jasjotdhillon3111
    @jasjotdhillon3111 4 роки тому +2624

    "I can't say for sure but its guaranteed to work" - Kevin (can travel time sideways)

    • @JorgetePanete
      @JorgetePanete 4 роки тому +29

      TAIMU DORIFTO

    • @jamesavery4016
      @jamesavery4016 4 роки тому +6

      That part was great 😂

    • @Felixr2
      @Felixr2 4 роки тому +50

      Honestly, travelling through time sideways sounds like a very convoluted way to describe teleportation.

    • @jamesbailey4304
      @jamesbailey4304 4 роки тому

      Ah, the Janeway gambit

    • @nonyabizness577
      @nonyabizness577 4 роки тому

      😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @saladking2370
    @saladking2370 4 роки тому +2163

    "What if instead of going backwards through time, we went sideways?"
    Marvel: *WRITE THAT DOWN! WRITE THAT DOWN!

    • @glumbortango7182
      @glumbortango7182 4 роки тому +62

      If Δt can be negative, I guess you might as well try to pull some complex numbers out of whatever chimera abomination voodoo magic is happening.

    • @virulence262
      @virulence262 4 роки тому +5

      @@glumbortango7182 my reaction to these thread is exactly as shown in 1:10

    • @angel-light11
      @angel-light11 4 роки тому +6

      Charles the French :)

    • @johnathanmonsen6567
      @johnathanmonsen6567 4 роки тому +7

      Funnily enough, it COULD make sense if you use probability as a second dimension of time- instead of separating moments in time, it would separate possible sequences of events or timeLINES. Not exactly helpful, of course, as we don't know how (or if it CAN be done) to properly control our movement in the FIRST dimension of time, and that one we actually know exists and can actually MEASURE. To travel sideways, we'd have to be in a reality in which alternate timelines are more than hypothetical, PROVE that they exist, and then develop an entirely new field of physics from zilch to the point of fully practical application. Maybe travelling back in time WOULD be easier.

    • @blauwbeer556
      @blauwbeer556 4 роки тому

      @@johnathanmonsen6567 that was what i was thinking, although you seem to have more knoweledge in the subject.

  • @sayonil
    @sayonil 4 роки тому +2357

    You forgot one: one guy doing the work of a hundred scientists while hiding alone because the government is out to get him.

    • @baab4229
      @baab4229 4 роки тому +155

      The weird and quirky smart guy that is messy and kinda rude to his boss but can do the mental and physical work of a 100 scientists.

    • @robertmorrison1657
      @robertmorrison1657 4 роки тому +19

      HAHAHAHAHA, that is such a cliche. It is such a popular stereotype.

    • @jordantheoneandonly3880
      @jordantheoneandonly3880 4 роки тому +2

      Sounds like a personal problem, bud

    • @coolmasterx5707
      @coolmasterx5707 4 роки тому +3

      Sherlock Holmes

    • @peteryordanov7676
      @peteryordanov7676 4 роки тому +5

      @@baab4229 you mean there aren't scientists like that ?

  • @claytonbredelllewis4826
    @claytonbredelllewis4826 4 роки тому +1897

    Me: The science is impossible!
    Him: KEvIn WaS aBLe tO bUiLd tHis iN a CaVe!!

    • @willook9170
      @willook9170 4 роки тому +182

      With a box of scraps

    • @claytonbredelllewis4826
      @claytonbredelllewis4826 4 роки тому +17

      @@willook9170 ahh yes

    • @coena9377
      @coena9377 4 роки тому +33

      I was just thinking that Kevin seems to be Tony Stark.

    • @zephyr7
      @zephyr7 4 роки тому +18

      iM nOt kEvIn

    • @KevinS47
      @KevinS47 4 роки тому +16

      That's right boi, I created that shit with my bare hands down in a cave.

  • @sadcypher8048
    @sadcypher8048 4 роки тому +1719

    movie: explaining the physics of a wormhole is too complex for the audience to understand.
    scientist: hold my paper and pencil.

    • @oshinvats7304
      @oshinvats7304 4 роки тому +45

      Good ol interstellar

    • @robfl100
      @robfl100 4 роки тому +46

      I'm pretty sure the paper wormhole explanation actually doesn't work. In all the movies, they bend the paper to connect the two points. If you think about it that means you would have to bend the entire universe in order for a wormhole to work

    • @livethefuture2492
      @livethefuture2492 4 роки тому +3

      how would a wormhole really work, I mean you can't bend the universe like that? does this mean that we need a 4th spacial dimension?

    • @robfl100
      @robfl100 4 роки тому +19

      @@livethefuture2492 even if you had a fourth dimension , you would actually have to travel more distance than normal. Imagine it with a 1D line. The shortest distance is obviously still a straight line, you can draw a curve between the two points that goes into 2 dimensions, but the arc length is still longer than the straight line. The only way to get a shorter distance is by bending the piece of paper. That's where it breaks down, because you can't just bend lightyears worth of space to fit your convenience. So even if wormholes do exist, they wouldn't be a shortcut.

    • @sarahg4409
      @sarahg4409 4 роки тому +3

      I believe it’s the other way around...

  • @SuperStingray
    @SuperStingray 4 роки тому +521

    You forgot the “we only use 10% of our brain” guy.

    • @rufusapplebee1428
      @rufusapplebee1428 3 роки тому +2

      Which entity is incharge of the remaining 90% of every brains capacity is classified.
      now go feed your cat, hooman.

  • @coena9377
    @coena9377 4 роки тому +1788

    You forgot the genius scientist who always has brilliant ideas in response to a less smart characters saying something mundane. The conversation be like
    Genius protagonist: I've ran all the numbers! I've checked all the simulations! I can't figure it out!
    Genius protagonist's dumb friend: Maybe it's time for you to walk away and know you aren't god, you can't figure everything out all the time. Now that I've imparted that great wisdom on you, let's eat some Captain Crunch.
    Genius protagonist **Gets startled look in their icy blue genius eyes**
    Genius protagonist's dumb friend: What, what is it?
    Genius protagonist: That's... oh my god... that's it!
    Genius protagonist's dumb friend: What's it?
    Genius protagonist: What you just said!
    Genius protagonist's dumb friend: You mean about Captain Crunch?
    Genius protagonist: Yes! I've been running the numbers, but I should've been CRUNCHING the numbers!!!!
    Genius protagonist **crunches numbers and saves the day**
    I mean that's literally the plot to every episode of House. Sure, maybe House isn't a show about scientists, but it's a medical drama so close enough.
    Edit: Guys, the reason I know that’s the plot to essentially every House episode is because I’ve seen them all. I love the show, the eureka moments are just a bit cliche.

    • @luizftavares
      @luizftavares 4 роки тому +61

      Still, House is so good I can't get enough of his epiphanies

    • @coena9377
      @coena9377 4 роки тому +85

      @@luizftavares Don't get me wrong, I love the show, it's just hilarious how he's more likely to figure out the mystery disease by Wilson coincidentally saying something that gives House an idea than from medical testing or anything.

    • @Catmeat106
      @Catmeat106 4 роки тому +7

      Coen A youre right but overall it’s fun and entertaining so that’s all I care about lol

    • @Jeeves_0
      @Jeeves_0 4 роки тому +17

      At least House is self aware when it comes to that cliche and make a joke out of it.

    • @masanetthomas8586
      @masanetthomas8586 4 роки тому +2

      @@coena9377 To be fair, it is only the final answer that is presented as an epiphany. The rest of the reasoning is quite ...well... reasonable ^^

  • @jackp4447
    @jackp4447 4 роки тому +2836

    Kevin: “So, I stayed up late last night tinkering with my quantum computer and quantum bioreplicator and I think I’ve done it, it’s the cure for coronavirus. I crunched the numbers, the quantum states should keep the virus stable enough to perform its job. Quantum.”

    • @hoodedR
      @hoodedR 4 роки тому +148

      Quantum

    • @pugboi8017
      @pugboi8017 4 роки тому +52

      holy shit even deepak chopra couldn’t have said it better

    • @mehmetesatguler8457
      @mehmetesatguler8457 4 роки тому +15

      Andrew:kevin i can't believe you done that

    • @Sid37612
      @Sid37612 4 роки тому +9

      Quantum

    • @gnikola2013
      @gnikola2013 4 роки тому +11

      Quantumvirus

  • @josewui414
    @josewui414 4 роки тому +501

    no one:
    movie scientist: QUANTUM

    • @6900xx
      @6900xx 4 роки тому

      Oh yeah LMAO

    • @Johncornwell103
      @Johncornwell103 4 роки тому

      Antman even pointed that out lol

    • @tahminahabeeb175
      @tahminahabeeb175 4 роки тому

      More like the flash

    • @tahminahabeeb175
      @tahminahabeeb175 4 роки тому +1

      And marvel and inception okay fine! Every scientific movie and tv show or more like sci fi has these words

  • @ztk211
    @ztk211 4 роки тому +715

    you forgot the one that gets ignored before every apocalypse movie, only to end up being right all along, but it's too late and everyone dies

  • @NoJusticeNoPeace
    @NoJusticeNoPeace 4 роки тому +379

    "You need me to make an imaginary matter accelerator?"
    "Will that be difficult?"
    "Actually, it's super easy, barely an inconvenience."

  • @RoGu3SP4RN297
    @RoGu3SP4RN297 4 роки тому +842

    I didn’t know it was possible to develop so much hate for Kevin in such a short amount of time.

  • @RC32Smiths01
    @RC32Smiths01 4 роки тому +271

    The moment I saw this, I thought of "Scientist who just blabbers out a bunch of complex or uncommon technical terms in sentence to sound intelligent"

    • @deathstroke8639
      @deathstroke8639 4 роки тому

      Yep.

    • @anujarora0
      @anujarora0 4 роки тому +7

      The terms are called buzz words

    • @notyourbruh
      @notyourbruh 4 роки тому +12

      @Raresh C. You mean Quantum Buzzwords ?

    • @Jeeves_0
      @Jeeves_0 4 роки тому +4

      Now you see the special thing there is that the neuro quantum astro flux field allows for it due to the trachiosk effect.

    • @Madchemist002
      @Madchemist002 4 роки тому +4

      @@Jeeves_0 This allows it to charge the inhibitors with plasma energy capable of creating a photon field to superimpose its physical state.

  • @mohammadtarshihi364
    @mohammadtarshihi364 4 роки тому +909

    The sad thing is that there are actual people who believe crossing the x's is the right way to go.

    • @tempestandacomputer6951
      @tempestandacomputer6951 4 роки тому +180

      As long as you cross em at a 90 degree angle.

    • @EpicMathTime
      @EpicMathTime 4 роки тому +117

      I love how the top one becomes a 0 but the bottom one becomes a 1.

    • @justinw4514
      @justinw4514 4 роки тому +81

      Frankly I don't see what he did wrong; he got the right answer so the methodology must have been sound

    • @coena9377
      @coena9377 4 роки тому +186

      Of course it is, if you ignore the x's the equation makes sense. Equations always work when you ignore the x's. For example, you've want to buy a new flat screen but your ex keeps demanding you pay her child support? Cross out the ex and you get a flat screen.

    • @jonsvare6874
      @jonsvare6874 4 роки тому +16

      It is though, right? I assumed he just skipped some writing.
      1) rewrite ( 1 + x) / x as a sum of two fractions: ( 1 / x ) + ( x / x )
      2) the original expression is clearly only defined for nonzero x, so we can simplify x / x to 1 (as shown)
      3) subtract 1 from both sides, yielding:
      4) 1 / x = 1
      Quickly multiply both sides by x , confirming that x =1 is the solution set.
      In my assessment, step 2 above is the least obvious (though they are all pretty obvious) and is the key to arriving at this easy formulation of the solution. It is also the hardest step to do mentally (compared to subtracting 1 and multiplying by 1 ... ), hence why it is is illustrated. Furthermore, the "right" way to solve this would be to multiply both sides by x, then collect like terms and solve the resulting linear equation in one variable. However, this is totally equivalent to the formerly described strategy with the caveat that one must check to see what happens when the lost factor--here, "x"--is equal to zero. Since that behavior is also clear, I imagine this is pretty kosher, eh?
      Let me know if I'm missin' something here. Other than the triviality of the problem to begin with. Lol.

  • @acolli2095
    @acolli2095 4 роки тому +338

    Flibaducci numbers, the new Fibonacci numbers

    • @decay2__
      @decay2__ 4 роки тому +25

      Flibaducci Numbers: Get Crunched

    • @TheTrueVirus22
      @TheTrueVirus22 4 роки тому +3

      Well i mean if Fibonacci exists then why the hell wouldn´t Flibaducci numbers exist. It is probably the imaginary part of the Fibonacci numbers.

    • @robinsuj
      @robinsuj 4 роки тому +5

      @@TheTrueVirus22 Of course! They are: 1*i^1, 1*i^1, 2*i^2, 3*i^3, 5*i^5, 8*i^8,...

    • @shayanmoosavi9139
      @shayanmoosavi9139 4 роки тому +1

      @@robinsuj you just discovered a new sequence. QUICK, apply for fields.

  • @gangstagoose7207
    @gangstagoose7207 4 роки тому +521

    You forgot the movie scientist that puts the word quantum behind every sentence to sound authentic

    • @liamnicholas5764
      @liamnicholas5764 4 роки тому +61

      My younger sister, up until last year, thought that "quantum" was just a word made up by movies to give scientists magical powers.

    • @ianzen
      @ianzen 4 роки тому +7

      Sadly, that happens in real life as well

    • @MisterK9739
      @MisterK9739 4 роки тому +5

      ianzen well, with these "UA-cam-scientists" maybe

    • @ianzen
      @ianzen 4 роки тому +2

      @@MisterK9739 I was thinking more along the lines of product marketing.

    • @Nobody-pv9jt
      @Nobody-pv9jt 4 роки тому

      @@liamnicholas5764 lmao that's sad bro

  • @malharsingh337
    @malharsingh337 4 роки тому +157

    We need a movie where there's only 6 people left on Earth, and each one is a person from this skit

    • @Armendicus
      @Armendicus 4 роки тому +4

      that's doctor stone except they all have different talents.

  • @Lucaso7
    @Lucaso7 4 роки тому +102

    *kevin 3 months into his communications degree*
    "I'vE FinAlLy InvENtEd tImE TrAveL"

    • @rufusapplebee1428
      @rufusapplebee1428 3 роки тому

      Time travel has been invented over 450 billion times already and has been partially classified every single time.

  • @arceus-gf4uh
    @arceus-gf4uh 4 роки тому +167

    2:21 the most hilarous thing is that the result is correct LMAO

    • @connorjones915
      @connorjones915 4 роки тому +15

      I had to double check to be sure

    • @pauligrossinoz
      @pauligrossinoz 4 роки тому +8

      Yeah ... I assumed he f'd up because his method was crap ... but then I checked his answer and it was .... right! 😂
      Well played!

    • @MariaNicolae
      @MariaNicolae 4 роки тому +37

      Getting the right result through totally wrong methods is always hilarious

  • @Vaith
    @Vaith 4 роки тому +104

    scientist: "time space-"
    random character: "explain it in english"
    scientist: ~pulls out a piece of paper~
    me: "aw shit, here we go again"

    • @IceMetalPunk
      @IceMetalPunk 4 роки тому +5

      At least in Thor, they correctly called it an Einstein-Rosen bridge... before pulling out the paper analogy.

    • @TheZenytram
      @TheZenytram 4 роки тому

      I wanna see a parody that the guy get a dictionary

    • @Entomology314
      @Entomology314 Рік тому

      100th like babyyyyyy

  • @ayaanali3782
    @ayaanali3782 4 роки тому +74

    I ate some quantum cereal today with some quantum milk, I took a quantum shower, then a quantum shave and then finally a quantum shit

    • @frostbite9944
      @frostbite9944 4 роки тому +11

      So ..... You did everything but in *quantum* amounts?

    • @mahmoudnasser3410
      @mahmoudnasser3410 3 роки тому

      Ayo how smelly was that quantum shit tho?

  • @aladinamami4260
    @aladinamami4260 4 роки тому +115

    instead of going back in time, just reset the timeline and travel forward

    • @caav56
      @caav56 4 роки тому +2

      ("JORGE JOESTAR" flashbacks)

  • @AdityaKumar-ij5ok
    @AdityaKumar-ij5ok 4 роки тому +36

    Maria: when did you became an expert in tHeRmONuClEaR AsTrOpHySiCs?
    Tony(an engineer): *Last Night*

  • @jaykay5115
    @jaykay5115 4 роки тому +38

    “Turn it into a mobius strip and find its eigenvalues”

  • @rhosymedra6628
    @rhosymedra6628 4 роки тому +579

    I like how half of this is digs at Tony stark's mega dumb plan from endgame

    • @coena9377
      @coena9377 4 роки тому +114

      I mean Kevin is basically Tony.
      Maria Hill: When did you become an expert in thermonuclear astrophysics?
      Tony Stark (an engineer, who definitely wouldn't have training in thermonuclear astrophysics): Last night.

    • @jordantheoneandonly3880
      @jordantheoneandonly3880 4 роки тому +5

      Coen A exactly

    • @SomeAHole
      @SomeAHole 4 роки тому +24

      @@coena9377 I mean his super power is supposed to be like, being a super duper genius

    • @Nobody-pv9jt
      @Nobody-pv9jt 4 роки тому +18

      @@SomeAHole and that's literally what the video is making fun of, what are you trying to get at?

    • @SomeAHole
      @SomeAHole 4 роки тому +25

      @@Nobody-pv9jt The video makes fun of tropes about scientists in movies. Tony Stark is a specific MCU character with a specific characterisation.
      Trope=/=character.

  • @pauligrossinoz
    @pauligrossinoz 4 роки тому +67

    Somebody has to say *"Einstein-Rosen bridge".* Sounds way cooler than "wormhole".
    Decades ago it was mandatory to mention a *Dyson-sphere,* but they just aren't cool anymore ....

    • @52flyingbicycles
      @52flyingbicycles 4 роки тому +9

      An Einstein-Rosen bridge is a specific type of wormhole that takes infinite time to pass through because it’s in the singularity of a black hole 😕don’t give those Hollywood writers any ideas?

    • @thek2despot426
      @thek2despot426 3 роки тому +1

      Dyson spheres aren't cool anymore?! 😢

  • @johnchung8542
    @johnchung8542 4 роки тому +35

    movies: it works by quantum physics
    me: no...that's not how quantum physics work

  • @JamFilledDonut
    @JamFilledDonut 4 роки тому +67

    Andrew: This video is sponsored”
    Me: *Clicks like immediately out of pride that Andrew continues to have a sponsor.*
    Monetise that shit Dr Dotson

  • @ekt2656
    @ekt2656 4 роки тому +58

    Last time I was this early, I was still doing Thermodynamics for science olympiad

  • @shafkatmehmood7216
    @shafkatmehmood7216 4 роки тому +146

    Kevin has the cure for coronavirus and any future pandemic

    • @6900xx
      @6900xx 4 роки тому +1

      Haha lol

  • @jeff_1300
    @jeff_1300 4 роки тому +26

    "OK so first we enhance the quantum wormhole sequence then we use the particle accelerameter to determine the quantum peepee and then assuming that all energy is mass we use the uncertainty principle to shrink ant man through the einstein-rosen bridge whilst using the square root of pi squared, and finally the atomic number of hydrogen is 1." - famous biologist, Rick Sanchez

  • @user-nr5fm1kd7l
    @user-nr5fm1kd7l 4 роки тому +148

    Who else paused and stared at the equation for about a minute to verify that the solution was correct

    • @southernkatrina8161
      @southernkatrina8161 4 роки тому +7

      I still think it reads 1=2

    • @IceMetalPunk
      @IceMetalPunk 4 роки тому +11

      I mean, it wasn't a hard equation 😂 The answer was correct, the solution, however, was not.

    • @shinobix4925
      @shinobix4925 4 роки тому +1

      @@IceMetalPunk **crosses letter X**
      Movie Scientist : I understand everything now

    • @teamcybr8375
      @teamcybr8375 4 роки тому +1

      @@southernkatrina8161 anything divided by 1 is the same number. 1+1 = 2

    • @goldcherries
      @goldcherries 4 роки тому +2

      @@teamcybr8375 mind blown 🤯

  • @wetasspaddington
    @wetasspaddington 4 роки тому +26

    "It's drawing power from the Earth's core!"
    "Now that's some bullshit."

    • @PaulMThe
      @PaulMThe 4 роки тому

      XD, BUT IT IS ACTUALLY DRAWING IT, WE GONNA DIE!

  • @formerctgovernordannelmall1452
    @formerctgovernordannelmall1452 4 роки тому +310

    My money’s on there being at least one guy doing the “sO iF yOu ImAgInE sPaCe Is A sHeEt”
    Edit: YUUUUUUUUUUUP

  • @absbenr
    @absbenr 4 роки тому +63

    next: movie engineers

    • @godwavenexus
      @godwavenexus 4 роки тому +3

      absbenr Killing Thanos with a potato gun.

    • @Jeeves_0
      @Jeeves_0 4 роки тому +6

      Yeah, the ones who build a futuristic spacecraft in theor back yard with only a screw driver, a pair of pliers and a hammer for tools.

    • @Shindawg
      @Shindawg 4 роки тому +4

      who is also a mechanic. and jet pilot

    • @johannesschmitt794
      @johannesschmitt794 4 роки тому +2

      Denny Shin that’s the most ridiculous part about these scenes. Not them coming up with the concepts and getting a somewhat sensible solution, but the fact that they only need a file, a bunch of scrap parts and three screws to construct a Death Star in their mothers backyard.

  • @gdhexan3590
    @gdhexan3590 4 роки тому +20

    The moment I saw that thumbnail I knew there will be some pencil that will penetrate that piece of paper.

  • @FlatEarthCEO
    @FlatEarthCEO 4 роки тому +19

    are we all gonna ignore the fact that andrew is lowkey becoming a good actor?

  • @rileybeckham560
    @rileybeckham560 4 роки тому +11

    Andrew, it’s a testament to how funny you are that I’ve laughed at that paper wormhole joke a dozen times without actually getting the joke. Hope you’ve been doing well in quarantine.

  • @anonymousentropy4227
    @anonymousentropy4227 4 роки тому +57

    Incredibly Funny but you forgot one: Tony Stark

    • @sjegannath6295
      @sjegannath6295 4 роки тому +5

      The best scientist who learns up in one night and masters it.

    • @Laslus_
      @Laslus_ 4 роки тому +6

      Listen, I love Tony, but he is ALL of them. he is an engineer but yeah sure he can discover a new element, create a machine that see your memories and invent time travel

  • @mariagalleriaxi8632
    @mariagalleriaxi8632 4 роки тому +4

    "They use the force of gravity, redirecting it into differential equation slopes that you can surf" - Jupiter Ascending, the movie where channing tatum has anti-gravity boots......

  • @ilke3192
    @ilke3192 4 роки тому +30

    Last time I was this early the Earth's surface was still molten.

  • @rohanc9509
    @rohanc9509 4 роки тому +52

    Andrew I would love to see you look at the Advanced Placement physics 1 and 2 exams. They have changed quite a bit in recent years, and I would love to know your opinion since a majority of your viewership are high school students. Maybe looking at recent free response questions! Thanks and great content as always!

    • @AndrewDotsonvideos
      @AndrewDotsonvideos  4 роки тому +21

      That's an interesting idea.

    • @tahakaleem1783
      @tahakaleem1783 4 роки тому +6

      @@AndrewDotsonvideos if you're thinking about it you should also check out the ap physics c exams, which are also popular.

    • @pistachiomuffin7005
      @pistachiomuffin7005 4 роки тому +1

      @@tahakaleem1783 I'm taking AP Physics C next year and I'm terrified ._.
      I'm also kind of looking forward to it, it'll be my first real physics course (physical science in middle school doesn't really count).

  • @nadili19
    @nadili19 4 роки тому +26

    My family always complains I'm the party pooper when I rant about this stuff, specially watching sci fi movies!

  • @Fubble123
    @Fubble123 4 роки тому +8

    2:42 You already had a paper with several holes in it! There was no reason to pierce that poor piece of paper! ... hehehe pierce poor piece paper

  • @todabsolute
    @todabsolute 4 роки тому +8

    Protagonist: WTF?!!! WHY IS THERE A GIANT BURGER SQUISHING PONIES ON THE SUN???!!!!!
    Protagonist's nerdy friend: quantum
    Protagonist: Ah, I see...

  • @adwaitisgreat
    @adwaitisgreat 4 роки тому +8

    "I can't say for sure but it is guaranteed to work." killed me 🤣🤣🤣

  • @ironbero212
    @ironbero212 4 роки тому +6

    2:48 I thought this would be the first thing here! Great video as always.

  • @virment2032
    @virment2032 4 роки тому +8

    *insert scientific gibberish
    *"In English please."*

  • @theaudjob3267
    @theaudjob3267 4 роки тому +9

    We need the scientist who is the one person who thinks whatever the thing is (like dinosaurs) is a bad idea but no one listens.

  • @coin5207
    @coin5207 4 роки тому +15

    The fact that the genius is called Kevin in pretty ironic
    In quite a few European countries the name Kevin is considered to be synonymous with "idiot" or "fool" or just a low IQ person in general.
    In Germany and Austria we even use it as an insult - as in "Jesus this guy just tried to put Diesel in a gasoline car - what a Kevin" or in a joke - e.g.
    Doctor: "I'm so sorry Miss."
    Mother: "Why? What's wrong with him??"
    Doctor: "It's a Kevin"

    • @baguettegott3409
      @baguettegott3409 4 роки тому

      I always kinda assumed that was an international thing... is it not?
      I'm so used to the dude named Kevin introducing himself as "Hi, my name is Kevin and I have a problem - but you already knew that..."

    • @yesyesyesyes1600
      @yesyesyesyes1600 3 роки тому

      The poor Austrian Kevins ... I know a lot of them 😁

  • @64standardtrickyness
    @64standardtrickyness 4 роки тому +62

    Ancient times:
    King: Priest, do a divination to see if we should do this.
    Priest: I did a divination and the signs say we should not.
    King: Do another divination, but differently.
    Priest: I did another divination differently this time, and the signs said we should.
    Modern times:
    President: Scientist crunch the numbers to see if we should do this.
    Scientist: I crunched the numbers and the data says we should not.
    President: Crunch the numbers again but differently.
    Scientist: I crunched the numbers again differently this time and the data says we should.

    • @Thecobra252527
      @Thecobra252527 4 роки тому +12

      It's called "making the data confess". Sadly, manipulating data to prove some kind of preconceived notion is done too much in real science, even peer-reviewed studies aren't safe from it.

    • @64standardtrickyness
      @64standardtrickyness 4 роки тому +3

      @@Thecobra252527 The point I was trying to make is that despite all our technology we are genetically just the same as our ancestors. We merely want some higher entity to acknowledge what we are doing is right.

  • @polarisgemini52
    @polarisgemini52 4 роки тому +2

    I think the show that made the best joke with 'crunch the numbers', is The office where Michael asks the bank guy to crunch the numbers again and the banker just presses the spacebar lmao

    • @alexjackson1
      @alexjackson1 4 роки тому +1

      bank guy: 'crunch'
      pam: '...did it help?'

  • @satyaprakash03133
    @satyaprakash03133 4 роки тому +6

    There are another kind,who always wants to put
    "Schrödinger equation" in what ever they know.

  • @VaradMahashabde
    @VaradMahashabde 4 роки тому +8

    "Are you seriously comparing Here Kevin to Sir Isaac Newton?"
    "His paper is amazing. Just read it"
    "He gives no footnotes"
    "He answered a question no one cares about"

  • @user-np1gs4le2i
    @user-np1gs4le2i 4 роки тому +7

    "THEN WHEN THE PATIENT WOKE UP HIS SKELETON WAS MISSING!!!"

    • @lawrencecalablaster568
      @lawrencecalablaster568 4 роки тому

      “and the doctor was never heard from again!
      Anyhow, that’s how I lost my medical license…”

  • @clickpause8732
    @clickpause8732 4 роки тому +1

    I went through all the trouble of solving the equation on the board and then you did that solution and it _hurt_ my _soul._

  • @jayr7307
    @jayr7307 4 роки тому +3

    YES! We need your videos in quarantine times Andrew. Hope your Phd is going well.

  • @zoharshemtov2754
    @zoharshemtov2754 4 роки тому +5

    "I can't say for sure but It's guaranteed to work"

  • @6900xx
    @6900xx 4 роки тому +8

    You forgot to mention the one Asian scientist who survives the dinosaurs everytime in all Jurassic Park/ World movie he's in.

    • @trilobitose
      @trilobitose 4 роки тому +1

      and nobody stops him from making more clones

  • @snehithification
    @snehithification 4 роки тому +3

    “I can’t say for sure, but it’s guaranteed to work” - me every time before I make a stupid life decision.

  • @Panure
    @Panure 4 роки тому +17

    what about that one guy who explains the SF stuff with "vibrations" and "frequencies"

  • @atrocity9398
    @atrocity9398 9 місяців тому +1

    Don't forget...if there is an error after "crunching the numbers," its because they forgot to "carry the one"
    and let's not forget the college student (who isn't even a stem major) solves an equation in a minute that an entire class of stem students couldn't solve for weeks

  • @deceo2119
    @deceo2119 4 роки тому +5

    Person in charge: Hey mr scientist, could this work?
    Scientist: well, in theory it's possible
    Person in charge: Do it!
    Scientist: it worked perfectly.

  • @PaulMThe
    @PaulMThe 4 роки тому +3

    Fun fact: Andrew Dotson will become famous, Hollywood will cast him and he will have to play one of these characters.

  • @MrFiestaification
    @MrFiestaification 4 роки тому +15

    What about using dark matter as an explanation for literally anything

  • @brienwashington4019
    @brienwashington4019 4 роки тому +8

    You forgot "making a simple solution sound complicated because the movie's genius describes it" 😂. Example: Donald Glover in "The Martian".

  • @Patrick-vy6pp
    @Patrick-vy6pp 4 роки тому +12

    Interstellar reference? My favorite science movie.

    • @mrahzzz
      @mrahzzz 4 роки тому +2

      lOvE iS tHe FiFtH dImEnSiOn
      but really, I actually enjoy that movie, with or without the deus ex machina ending

  • @adarshdomala6895
    @adarshdomala6895 4 роки тому +38

    Travel through time in sideways 😂😂😂😂

    • @chuadaniel7898
      @chuadaniel7898 4 роки тому +1

      *Travel through multiple-dimensional time in sideways

    • @davidgil6485
      @davidgil6485 4 роки тому +1

      i just thought about it and imagine 2 dimensions of time. What does that even mean? Somebody must've thought about it already

    • @lightingbolt85
      @lightingbolt85 4 роки тому +1

      @@davidgil6485 There's actually some cases with complex time, with a real and imaginary time components: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_time_dimensions#Speculative_approaches

  • @bryantandres7505
    @bryantandres7505 3 роки тому +1

    I feel like we aren’t acknowledging the scientists who always think the solution to everything is to “reverse the polarity” of something.
    Great video! I think you should make this into a mini series lol 😂

  • @noahburke1533
    @noahburke1533 4 роки тому +13

    I'm a simple man. I see Andrew, I hit like.

  • @BryanTrevino-tp6jh
    @BryanTrevino-tp6jh Рік тому +1

    ‘’What if instead of crunching the numbers, we ran the numbers?’’
    ‘’Get on it!‘’

  • @PapaFlammy69
    @PapaFlammy69 4 роки тому +21

    bruhv

  • @saularias3250
    @saularias3250 4 роки тому +1

    This reminds so much of Tony Stark, in the first movie he's a weapon engineer and by the last movie he invents time travel.

  • @jurkokubik6383
    @jurkokubik6383 4 роки тому +4

    “Dam it Kevin” killed me

  • @cyris8400
    @cyris8400 4 роки тому

    Y'know what really grinds my gears? That sci-fi trope where the lead scientist in charge of reverse-engineering the crashed alien ship says to the General/President/Protagonist "We don't know what it's made of but it's not on the Periodic Table". ... Um, what? Like, is it just a somehow stable superheavy element? Nanobots that swim away from your test equipment? Some kind of un-atomic matter? No thought into it, it's just a trope passed over from the Roswell story, and it's in every ship-crashed-on-Earth story.

  • @mrmeowtv6248
    @mrmeowtv6248 4 роки тому +6

    Captain: Scientist, use the space machine to save so and so before the black hole collapses!
    Scientist: But captain, we don't have enough fancy space fuel and we will die to death!
    Captain: We must do it! It's our only chance!
    *Somehow miraculously saves so and so safely making the scientists look like complete dummies*

  • @MCLooyverse
    @MCLooyverse 4 роки тому

    That "i doo" at the end really got me. Good stuff.

  • @GeneralAblon
    @GeneralAblon 4 роки тому +6

    You forgot the "Blessed with Divine Knowledge" one, who somehow guesses exactly what is going on without nearly enough information. Think Anne Hathaways character in Interstellar with the 'Love transcends time' mumbo jumbo, which for some freaking reason works, despite it being the ramblings of a love sick puppy. No offense meant, the visuals were sick, but damn that ending.

    • @EscapeVelocity11186
      @EscapeVelocity11186 4 роки тому

      I don't think Hathaway's character from Interstellar qualifies for that. In the movie, they had two viable options since both planets had positive data, and Hathaway's character was arguing for the one her lover had gone to. McConaughey's character brought them to the trap, but given the information they had at the time, either option would have been okay. Her whole spiel about how "love transcends space and time" (which may be true in a sense) was just her argument for why they should go to the planet with her lover rather than the other guy's planet. The ending is disconnected from that choice. On the topic of the movie's ending, I find it strange how many people focus on the tesseract in the black hole and not the wormhole that appeared in the Solar System - both are very sci-fi (presumably sent by future humans), but many people seemingly forget that the entire premise of the movie (a wormhole artificially opening up in the Solar System that leads to potentially habitable planets) is completely sci-fi.

  • @murr2k2
    @murr2k2 4 роки тому +3

    "It never occured to me to think of space as the thing that was moving." -- movie engineer

  • @Thomaster9999
    @Thomaster9999 4 роки тому +3

    You forgot the most important one
    "This completely ridiculous thing works because SOMETHINGSOMETHINGQUANTUM!"

  • @jimbobur
    @jimbobur 4 роки тому +2

    2:20 When the algebra is wrong but the answer is right.
    *Task Failed Successfully*

  • @sitas9827
    @sitas9827 4 роки тому +5

    I was literally waiting for the sheet of paper 😂😂😂

  • @huntermorgan6177
    @huntermorgan6177 4 роки тому

    2:51 I swear to god if I ever hear someone explain a wormhole using a folded sheet of paper again i'll scream

  • @kanamis
    @kanamis 4 роки тому +3

    "what if instead of going backwards in time, we went sideways?" To answer that, we're gonna need to talk about parallel universes. You see, mario's position is a floating point numb-

  • @hannahbechtel1405
    @hannahbechtel1405 4 роки тому +1

    You should definitely make a part 2!

  • @amiss8828
    @amiss8828 4 роки тому +6

    Andrew don’t lie you’re gonna be in a movie and you’re gonna have to be one of these in couple of years 😉 👍

  • @copingwithsunset
    @copingwithsunset 4 роки тому +1

    I love how this calls Tony's "quantum gibberish" from Endgame out🤣

  • @Safwan.Hossain
    @Safwan.Hossain 4 роки тому +3

    Last time I was this early, I was studying last minute for an online exam at 8am on a Wednesday morning.

  • @RelativelyBest
    @RelativelyBest 4 роки тому +1

    "Jesus Christ! Is that even possible?"
    "I can't say for sure, but it's guaranteed to work."
    Okay, that _actually_ got me laughing for real. Wow, it's been a while.

  • @sandyd4271
    @sandyd4271 4 роки тому +4

    @ 3:06 the equation on the white board. Unfortunately I don’t see the right hand side. Is It a Einstein Field equation with Ricci tensor and scalar on the left side? Please show the complete thing! I cant sleep because of it!

    • @insouciantFox
      @insouciantFox 16 днів тому

      99% sure it's just the uncorrected Einstein field eqn. Gotta be 8πG/c⁴ T_μν

  • @VFreshii3
    @VFreshii3 4 роки тому

    I was SO waiting for the wormhole paper bit- did not disappoint

  • @alicebobson2868
    @alicebobson2868 4 роки тому +6

    the (insert any scientific word)ologist knows how to do literally everything no matter what😂

    • @jjtt
      @jjtt 4 роки тому

      the scientologist
      Is science a scientific word?

  • @3rdEarlRussell
    @3rdEarlRussell 3 роки тому +1

    Ian Malcolm is its own type of scientist: “your scientists were so worried with whether or know they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should.”

  • @otiagomarques
    @otiagomarques 4 роки тому +21

    2:19 this hurt

    • @dimizav
      @dimizav 4 роки тому +6

      Well if it works :)

    • @jacobharris5894
      @jacobharris5894 4 роки тому +2

      Δημήτρης Ζαβιτσάνος Yeah because he was lucky.

  • @Snapeserverussnape
    @Snapeserverussnape 4 роки тому

    The x variable in the equation at 2:24 really is equal to 1 but the way that scientist solves the problem broke my academic soul in half.

  • @memyselfandi4109
    @memyselfandi4109 4 роки тому +3

    Kevin’s the successful cousin your mom will always bring up, but swears she’s not comparing you to