Adv Mpofu | Zuma Was Arrested Without A Trial | Jacob Zuma :MK Party VS IEC

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 9 тра 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 37

  • @innocentmlotshwa
    @innocentmlotshwa 29 днів тому +5

    Even a child can distinguish this simple. Mpofu is genius

  • @TheAssociateChannel
    @TheAssociateChannel Місяць тому +8

    Zuma was unfairly arrested

  • @LindaMadlala
    @LindaMadlala Місяць тому +7

    Remission erases all legal consequences of a sentence such as eligibility to work, have a bank account or to be elected into public office.

    • @lahlichauke8335
      @lahlichauke8335 28 днів тому +1

      Remission is the complete ending of a sentence before the full term of your sentence has been completed. If you are in prison and part of your sentence is remitted (reduced), you are released into the community without any further supervision or restrictions.

    • @lahlichauke8335
      @lahlichauke8335 28 днів тому

      What it means is that you are no longer going to coninue to serve the sentence.IT DOES NOT CHANGE THE FACT THAT YOU WERE SETENCED IN THE FIRST PLACE.....

    • @siszama2294
      @siszama2294 28 днів тому

      ​@@lahlichauke8335 thats parole. Even the dictionary detonation of remission is clear

  • @MichaelNtombela
    @MichaelNtombela 28 днів тому +4

    Adv Mpofu you are going to advate on my case and will do all in my powers that my dream comes true.

    • @lahlichauke8335
      @lahlichauke8335 28 днів тому

      Remission is the complete ending of a sentence before the full term of your sentence has been completed. If you are in prison and part of your sentence is remitted (reduced), you are released into the community without any further supervision or restrictions.

  • @mtilankatsa
    @mtilankatsa 29 днів тому +8

    Mpofu SC is excellent and justice Theron brings a flicker of hope in the judiciary

  • @user-my5vy2uh7y
    @user-my5vy2uh7y 24 дні тому +1

    I do not hear Adv dealing with possible defences that may have been raised against the contempt charge

  • @shaneschuller2513
    @shaneschuller2513 28 днів тому +3

    Mr Zuma has alwys been i fairly treated. It is ckear to me they will do everything to block him.

  • @victorndlela8208
    @victorndlela8208 28 днів тому +3

    Zuma is a Master of this game😂😂😂

  • @robertmatsebe3718
    @robertmatsebe3718 28 днів тому +1

    Zuma refused to appear for his contempt case

  • @nandivanqa-mgijima646
    @nandivanqa-mgijima646 28 днів тому +1

    My very first time to listen to both great minds Ngcukaithobi and Mpofu, i painfully say that Ngcukaitobi isn't substituting enough his arguments. It seems his defense arguments are driven by emotions.

    • @siszama2294
      @siszama2294 28 днів тому

      He's too emotional more like he's personally involved in the matter

  • @user-my5vy2uh7y
    @user-my5vy2uh7y 24 дні тому

    Zuma should have obeyed the court

  • @justicezwane6244
    @justicezwane6244 26 днів тому

    So now how does the judiciary deal with some who doesn't what to appear before the magistrates. To hear their side of the story. What happens to such people?
    What is a commission of inquiry.and what do the rules of an inquiry say about those who do not respect the inquiry
    Interpret the law with fairness don't divert from the fundamental core of the initial arrest of the former president.
    Some judges need scrutiny.

  • @lahlichauke8335
    @lahlichauke8335 29 днів тому

    Adv who does not know about direct access ..yohhhhh

  • @VictorShongwe
    @VictorShongwe 29 днів тому +2

    THE ONLY WAY TO JAIL ZUMA WAS TO DENY HIM OPPORTUNITY TO APPEAL. IN ORDER 'NOT' JAIL PW BOTHA, TRY HIM WHERE HE CAN PAY A FINE- CRY THE BELOVED COUNTRY....

    • @siszama2294
      @siszama2294 28 днів тому

      Messed up justice system. Its too personal

  • @user-mj7fk6gg7s
    @user-mj7fk6gg7s 29 днів тому +1

    The question is: was the accused not represented in court?
    Who lost the case then.
    A sentence was meted out and since it was direct access to an Apex Court, then the accuses had to bear the consequences.
    Whoa advised him not to appear when called?
    That wrong advice should bear the blame not the other way around.
    The question is: Can the ConCourt be a Court of First instance?
    Can it convict an accused? Yes it could when approached.
    As much as it could tinker with sentences from the Lower Courts.
    Bad advice then and trivial relook.

    • @lahlichauke8335
      @lahlichauke8335 28 днів тому

      brilliant analysis

    • @ThokozaniM
      @ThokozaniM 27 днів тому

      Bill of Rights. Don't be a hater.

    • @user-mj7fk6gg7s
      @user-mj7fk6gg7s 27 днів тому

      @@ThokozaniM The Law is the Law. No one is above the Law. No one is below the Law. All are equal before the eyes of the Law.
      You are subpoenaed to answer to a Tribunal or Court of Law, then do like wise.
      There is no boss in South Africa. I am not a sycophant but an objective citizen.
      No hater but a Law abiding citizen.

    • @user-mj7fk6gg7s
      @user-mj7fk6gg7s 27 днів тому

      @@ThokozaniM Only now that you speak of the Bill of Rights that were trampled upon on several occasions during his tenure.
      There will be no return to the Highest Office
      This purely regional and tribalistic. No train smash. The ANC will prevail.

    • @ThokozaniM
      @ThokozaniM 27 днів тому

      @@user-mj7fk6gg7s What I know is Our Rights as Citizens come first.

  • @innocentmlotshwa
    @innocentmlotshwa 29 днів тому +2

    😮remission means cancelled 8:07 8:07 l
    ed

  • @VictorShongwe
    @VictorShongwe 29 днів тому +1

    THE PRESIDENT CAN INTERFERE WITH THE LEGISLATURE

  • @mRX-wu7or
    @mRX-wu7or Місяць тому +1

    ANC ifun ukusi win ngomkhiloshosh

  • @danielogana3972
    @danielogana3972 29 днів тому

    A page full of mass personal delusion.