Thanks for this comparison. Both amazing machines at the top of their games for their ages. But a 1966 car with 300 BHP and a 5-speed transmission? Stunning.
Well unless she makes like 80% of the income, I don't understand why she has the authority to make that decision!!!??? Don't get me wrong.... I'm not one of those assholes that thinks woman should only be in the kitchen and should "mind their business while the men talk." Those dudes are total scum bags!!! However if its a situation where the money is plenty available for a purchase like that.... And you really want one, and the only thing stopping it is simply because she says "no!!!" I find that to also be total bullshit!!! And I would definitely be looking for a new lady in my life. A woman who doesn't stop me from living and truly enjoying and experiencing things in life that I want to!!!
The 330GT analogue every time, modern cars are boring to drive no involvement. Used to drive my 7 on those roads the feeling and involvement at legal speeds was the best ever.
I can remember not that long ago when the 2+2 models from the 60's were dirt cheep. For me tho I have always liked the four seaters. I'd love to have a 412 someday. I guess I'll have to settle for my '05 CL55 for now though.
Yes, I can remember when a local car dealership had a tatty, dark green Series 1 330 GT for sale for $25,000 (Australian). That was the early 80s. I asked my dad to take me to see it, because, as a teenager I was fanatical about Ferraris. Not having any money, nor a driver's licence, it was just to check it out. But yes, at that time, no one was really interested in such cars. Both the Series 1 and Series 2 were considered ugly and, in a way, they were; aesthetically so very different to the values of the 80s. Although I loved the 330, I thought it was ugly too. Not any more, though, of course. We see them with different eyes now. But on the question of lost opportunities, yes, I've always wanted to own a Ferrari and never have. I love my 2002 Porsche Boxster and am happy with that. The lessons I've learnt, though, as I've watched the used Ferrari market for 3+ decades are these: If you want a Ferrari and your budget is modest, go for the model no one wants at the time they are considered ugly or inferior or both. Those models will one day have their day. I've been close-but-not-close enough to being able to afford a Mondial, a 308GT4, the 400 series and a 365GT4 at various times, yet not quite been able to make the stretch and now, of course, such cars are way out of my reach. Don't buy it unless you can afford to spend 25% of the purchase price again on straightening it out in the first few months of ownership. Or you can do everything yourself. Be content with what you have. Yes, Ferraris are special cars but something cheaper, more common and more reliable might just provoke more smiles and less tears in the long run.
It's the 330 for me. That's my favourite 2+2 Ferrari that there's an outside chance of me owning one day. The rest of them have reached daft prices now. For now I'm still searching for a 550 Maranello
Love this spec on the 330 2+2. Tom Yang is featuring one on his channel. It’s worth a view for anyone interested in restoring or working on vintage Ferraris.
There are some underrated Ferraris from back in the day. The 250 GTE and the 330 GT 2+2 are just two great examples for that. Underrated in a sense of you're getting all the luxurious feeling and amazing design and engine art of Ferrari, but you're not fully breaking the bank. 200 - 250k EUR are still a s*%&load of money but in the greater scheme of things compared to a 250 SWB or even a Daytona...is it really worth the premium, if the main reason to buy them is to drive them?
Lusso was obviously slowed by the film of dirt and dead bugs that it carried. It is, without doubt, the most singularly underappreciated Ferrari of them all.
I choose the 330 gt. Because its beautiful in every way. And I prefer old car workmanship to anything from now. Those cars were built by hand so every car is unique.
8:54 just look at the side profile shot of the GTC four. How long is that car? The front seats are in the back almost. In fact they are actually to the back of the car looking at the proportions. I know it’s got a super front mid engine. But by God they are actually towards the back of the car
Nice video, my complements. Driving the old ones is an event, daily or occasionally. From a performance standpoint, the modern ones are superior but to what end? The 330 GT 2+2 Series 2 had an original build total (from 1965-1967, both RHD & LHD) of 455. Probably 250 remain. Although it's 'old fashioned' with a live rear axle, it's the same chassis as the 500 Superfast and very similar to the 400 Superamerica. I think Mr. Ferrari may have been onto something using the 2+2s as his regular drivers while leaving the racers on the track. Although they sort of were on the track in period; I believe a 330 GT 2+2 Series1 was used as the marshal's / pace car at the 1965 running of Le Mans and a 330 GT 2+2 Series 2 was used for the same purpose in 1966.
Before I watch this. Disclosure. I have never driven a Ferrari. It would seem to me that they are two different animals. One is an occasion of an older time. A throwback to sporty gentlemanly Grand Touring. The other is an occasion of doing it in a modern way. Faster and overall it is probably better in every way. Except, that the 330 is probably more of an occasion for the senses. More engaging. Imo. After watching I stand with my viewpoint. The Lusso makes muvh more sense to me. But, the 330 stirs something deep inside of my 57 year old soul. I can imagine a tingle coming over me as I approach her for a drive together. Preferably just the two of us.
330GT 2+2, please. I am wondering if age comes into this? I was a teenager when the 330GT was new and was totally besotted by its bigger sister the SF500 Superfast when I met it and was driven in one in 1966. Younger people may prefer the GTC4 Lusso as they may not have the knowledge and experience of the earlier car for comparison.
Lusso's a do-everything practical machine with that N/A imperious V12 and rear-biased four wheel drive. The GT's also practical in terms of accommodation and comfort but with the addition of sensational classic design. Both have excellent qualities in terms of driver involvement and sound. The GT's 300 horse power and 150 mph is still an awful lot of performance for the public highway if not of the comparatively lightning-quick level of the Lusso. Probably also needs very high levels of specialist servicing to keep it sweet but it also demands much higher skills to drive very fast. The GT wins for sheer visual theatre. A true thoroughbred from a golden era.
Reluctant 2nd gear when cold was a Ferrari thing on virtually all models from the early 60's (maybe earlier) through the late 90's when they first introduced F1 (paddle-shifting) on the 355 (where it had to be fixed because skipping 2nd wasn't possible). It should only take about 10 minutes of driving on the 330GT for 2nd gear to be fine. It takes about 20 minutes of driving for the engine oil to come up to full operating temperature.
@@pacovl46 There is a Brad Paisley song video where the premise is that he takes William Shatner's 355 out for a drive without him knowing and Brad complains about 2nd gear sticking a little when he's caught. William Shatner's response was "You found 2nd gear??? How'd you do that??". Very much of an inside joke, but pretty funny. This is the video -> ua-cam.com/video/B9mpDAJOPac/v-deo.html
It's a shame Ferrari don't do retro models that look and feel old school, but use modern components and technology. That would be a good middle ground.
Great video! Who would want to be a self-indulgent wiener when you could be a connoisseur. 330 every single time. The modern one doesn’t get a look in from me. Turn up anywhere if the 330 and you are a legend - turn up somewhere in a modern Ferrari and you are just a bit of a flash fucker. And I know which one I would rather be.
I know that the Ferrari GTC4 Lusso is one the most complete all rounders from the Brand which is a good choice, but I reckon that the Ferrari 330 just that nostalgic connection that you can't get in the new one's. For it's age is very ahead of his time which makes it a wise choice just not in value, also because it's a rare model.
WHAT ON EARTH has Pete been doing to his Lusso? Is that a huge dent/gash in the door near the handle? And he's kerbed the alloys too. What a yobbo. He needs to get back in his Nova!
@@scdDoes he work in a quarry?! I am insanely jealous of course, something is going right if you're able to daily a new Ferrari and look after an old one. Good on him, and thanks for the video!
330 for sure. You don't want a Ferrari as your everyday car, there are plenty of cars out there with reasonable performance that can get you around in style and comfort. A Ferrari should be a thing of beauty, a rolling sculpture that gets used on special occasions. A piece of escapism from the drudgery of life. When it becomes an everyday car you bring it down to the same level of daily drudgery like everything else, sitting at traffic lights, trying to find parking spots, stop start city driving .........ughhh!!
I owned a 330gt for about 20 years and put 30,000 miles on it. I loved it but, the maintenance on a Ferrari of that era was a killer. Close to $3 a mile on rebuilding absolutely everything multiple times. There really is nothing practical about it. Plus the car gets quite hot in the summer. Most people who own Ferraris of this vintage actually use them sparingly. Either their worried about the cars value or they don’t find it makes sense for many long trips with out a ride along mechanic. Loved loved the car, hated how many times I ended up on a tow truck. One more thing the 330 2 +2 handles great for a car of that era but is a poor handling car compared to the 2 seat Ferraris. The engine is quite heavy and the car tends to plow if you really push it.
100% I'd buy the 1966 car (assuming I could of course). And the reason is simple. Nobody is going to key scratch a 1966 masterpiece. Even the hardest cold-hearted scumbag would look at the 1966 car and think "Nah, put the key away, I can't do it." But the Lusso would be getting key scratched every day.
Neither, my 412 GTi (manual) is a better compromise. Enough classic feel, Pininfarina style and last of the Colombo V12s.... But if I had to choose, the 330 GT every time; that Lusso is soooo ugly
I think the Lusso is a fabulous car, but it can't hold a candle to the 330GT, you can't build that kind of character in any car today, there is little to no passion these days, cars are based on how many usb's and nonsense
330 a masterpiece, and... the 330 gtc is one of the most beautiful Ferraris ever. The Gtc4 is one of the worst looking ones imho. Ps 3:53 and 4:53 look at the back of the Car
@@2manycars713 thats fine , each to their own , we all have our own opinions , but don't tell me I dont know what im talking about because I dont share your opinion on a car . I think its a horrible design regardless of what ever branding it has on it .
@@paulthomson9709 actually I’m not even bothered, you don’t like the car that’s fine. But you still don’t know what your talking about, you’re just giving your opinions on what you think ‘looks’ nice.
It’s a revised version of the FF which has been around for years and it’s a great car. Ferrari made a master piece with that car so I’m sorry pal but you don’t know what you’re talking about.
@@2manycars713 the ff gets credited as ferraris first 4 wheel drive car but it wasn't there was a 408 built back in the 80s looked abit like a cross between a Honda nsx and Ford rs200 , this was there first 4 wheel drive car , but was cancelled , this 4rm 4 wheel drive system was then developed for the ff . But being a 4 seat ferrari it follow the 400 series , 456 and 612 and become a fairly cheap way to own a v12 ferrari . The overly complicated 4 wheel drive system will be horrendous when it needs replacing though .
@@paulthomson9709 Yes I’m aware of the 408 RM but this was just a prototype so it doesn’t count. I wouldn’t say it’s a cheap way to own a V12 Ferrari, I paid £304,000 for mine. If you want a cheap V12 you could buy a 400/412i/Testatossa/512TR/512LM/456/550/575/612/FF/F12 all of these are cheaper than the GTC4 but nowhere near as good. And the Lusso is so well developed that I wouldn’t worry about their 4 wheel drive system. I know of guys that have smashed 60,000kms on there Lusso’s without a single problem. Just like mine, not a single problem. And with the 4 year warranty that can be extended if needed, and the free 7 years servicing I really wouldn’t worry. But above all this, no matter what, I don’t worry about what ‘could’ go wrong, because it probably won’t and if it did then Ferrari would fix it because they wouldn’t want to lose face. And you know what I’m going to buy when I come to get rid of my GTC4 Lusso? Another GTC4 Lusso because they’re just that good.
Thanks for this comparison. Both amazing machines at the top of their games for their ages. But a 1966 car with 300 BHP and a 5-speed transmission? Stunning.
It is stunning isn't it!
The 330GT is pure art! Gorgeous.
Agreed! We couldn’t stop looking at the thing all day
3:51 that Daytona is great too
@@constantine2016 For sure! Didn’t notice that.
That Daytona was his butler bringing up the spare car just in case
I love seeing the Daytona lurking in the back of shot, beautiful cars across the board!
Still can’t stop thinking about that Daytona! Video to follow on that
Daytona in the background 😍
Yes that was also mine.
Well spotted! For a future video 👀
@@scd Daytona vs 599 GTO...
The 330 GT 2+2 series 2 is a real work of art!!!
I would definitely go for this one...
330 GT 2+2 and a cheap used BMW 340 X Drive M Sport Touring for everyday use.👍👍 Best of both worlds..
What a beautiful car the 330GT 2+2 is.
It’s achingly beautiful
Great video guys! Wish my eldest and I could convince the Mrs that the Lusso is awesome. V12, 4 proper seats and that noise!
Thank you! Surprised she’s not convinced and it really does everything and so so well!!
@@scd Says it's not a looker. I guess it is a bit marmite.
Well unless she makes like 80% of the income, I don't understand why she has the authority to make that decision!!!??? Don't get me wrong.... I'm not one of those assholes that thinks woman should only be in the kitchen and should "mind their business while the men talk." Those dudes are total scum bags!!! However if its a situation where the money is plenty available for a purchase like that.... And you really want one, and the only thing stopping it is simply because she says "no!!!" I find that to also be total bullshit!!! And I would definitely be looking for a new lady in my life. A woman who doesn't stop me from living and truly enjoying and experiencing things in life that I want to!!!
If you have your eldest and the GTC4 Lusso, you don’t need the wife.
The 330GT 2+2, my alltime favorite Ferrari. It's Epic!
You have fine taste! Very Underrated
@@scd Likewise!
Both are wonderful. Couldn't choose. Enjoyed that. Cheers Jonty.
Thanks for watching 🙌
xxxxçxcçccç
The 330GT analogue every time, modern cars are boring to drive no involvement. Used to drive my 7 on those roads the feeling and involvement at legal speeds was the best ever.
You talk sense Graham
330GT pure class
But really both
Agree with 💯 your thoughts
two lovely cars
Thanks for watching
I have chosen an FF - a lot cheaper than the Lusso but almost as good.
🤗😎
Cat & fiddle road and carpark ?🤗
Love both of them beauty's, a great video yet again jonty 🤗
Thanks Chaz! Yes our favourite stomping ground
@RichJW yep, same here
great video
by the way 4:52 there is a blue Daytona behind the 330 GT 2+2 : )
Yes there is, good spot. That’s also mine and that’s on the second part of the video which should be coming soon.
@@2manycars713 can't wait... : )
I can remember not that long ago when the 2+2 models from the 60's were dirt cheep. For me tho I have always liked the four seaters. I'd love to have a 412 someday. I guess I'll have to settle for my '05 CL55 for now though.
Yes, I can remember when a local car dealership had a tatty, dark green Series 1 330 GT for sale for $25,000 (Australian). That was the early 80s. I asked my dad to take me to see it, because, as a teenager I was fanatical about Ferraris. Not having any money, nor a driver's licence, it was just to check it out. But yes, at that time, no one was really interested in such cars. Both the Series 1 and Series 2 were considered ugly and, in a way, they were; aesthetically so very different to the values of the 80s. Although I loved the 330, I thought it was ugly too. Not any more, though, of course. We see them with different eyes now.
But on the question of lost opportunities, yes, I've always wanted to own a Ferrari and never have. I love my 2002 Porsche Boxster and am happy with that. The lessons I've learnt, though, as I've watched the used Ferrari market for 3+ decades are these:
If you want a Ferrari and your budget is modest, go for the model no one wants at the time they are considered ugly or inferior or both. Those models will one day have their day. I've been close-but-not-close enough to being able to afford a Mondial, a 308GT4, the 400 series and a 365GT4 at various times, yet not quite been able to make the stretch and now, of course, such cars are way out of my reach.
Don't buy it unless you can afford to spend 25% of the purchase price again on straightening it out in the first few months of ownership. Or you can do everything yourself.
Be content with what you have. Yes, Ferraris are special cars but something cheaper, more common and more reliable might just provoke more smiles and less tears in the long run.
It's the 330 for me. That's my favourite 2+2 Ferrari that there's an outside chance of me owning one day. The rest of them have reached daft prices now. For now I'm still searching for a 550 Maranello
Love the 550! Hope you find one
Keep looking at GTC4 Lusso video's very tempted.
A lot of car for the £££ and does literally everything!
Do it, great car, you want be disappointed
do it. just got mine and it’s an absolute dream
Love this spec on the 330 2+2. Tom Yang is featuring one on his channel. It’s worth a view for anyone interested in restoring or working on vintage Ferraris.
Definitely the 330GT,what a stunning car.WOW
Stunning....both cars......Where did the ghostly Daytona appear from...?
It’s in a future video 👀
It’s also one of mine, along with another one out of sight.
That 330 GT is my dream car and in that colour combo too. I'd save a few quid and have the FF over the Lusso
Good video lads, you did the cars proud. Thanks
It was a treat to have them out and about! Thanks for the opportunity
Great video, lovely commentary, fabulous cars and of course the 330 is a thing of beauty ..!
all my kingdom for this 330 .... and the bleue 365gtb/4 in the background !!
330gt all day!
i love the 330gt i want to see it in real life and the gtc4 lusso too.
330GT is just sublime 🙌
Cat & Fiddle pub / A54 area ?
Men, the leather is amazing.
Skipped straight past the Lusso footage. Im only here for the 330
👏👏👏
A Deliveroo pack in the boot of a GT4 C Lusso? Evil robot Bill and Ted must have bagged this car as well as a pizza on some parallel time adventure.
That V12 still sounds godly
330GT 2+2, I would only have a car for fun, not for every day drive, so Lusso's praticality is irrelevant for me. Also I love Vintage cars.
You have fine taste
There are some underrated Ferraris from back in the day. The 250 GTE and the 330 GT 2+2 are just two great examples for that. Underrated in a sense of you're getting all the luxurious feeling and amazing design and engine art of Ferrari, but you're not fully breaking the bank. 200 - 250k EUR are still a s*%&load of money but in the greater scheme of things compared to a 250 SWB or even a Daytona...is it really worth the premium, if the main reason to buy them is to drive them?
Lusso was obviously slowed by the film of dirt and dead bugs that it carried. It is, without doubt, the most singularly underappreciated Ferrari of them all.
All the dirt and bugs from being daily driven 👌
Compared to the 330GT, the Lusso is a rolling work of art.
3:51 that Daytona is my choise
I choose the 330 gt. Because its beautiful in every way. And I prefer old car workmanship to anything from now. Those cars were built by hand so every car is unique.
I’m having the 330 whilst there’s a few left. I’ll have a Lusso in a few years.
8:54 just look at the side profile shot of the GTC four. How long is that car? The front seats are in the back almost. In fact they are actually to the back of the car looking at the proportions. I know it’s got a super front mid engine. But by God they are actually towards the back of the car
Nice video, my complements.
Driving the old ones is an event, daily or occasionally. From a performance standpoint, the modern ones are superior but to what end? The 330 GT 2+2 Series 2 had an original build total (from 1965-1967, both RHD & LHD) of 455. Probably 250 remain. Although it's 'old fashioned' with a live rear axle, it's the same chassis as the 500 Superfast and very similar to the 400 Superamerica. I think Mr. Ferrari may have been onto something using the 2+2s as his regular drivers while leaving the racers on the track. Although they sort of were on the track in period; I believe a 330 GT 2+2 Series1 was used as the marshal's / pace car at the 1965 running of Le Mans and a 330 GT 2+2 Series 2 was used for the same purpose in 1966.
3:52 Where did the Daytona go?
Coming in a future video 👀👀
@@scd Thanks!
im looking at a 330 gt at moment....both beautiful cars
Before I watch this. Disclosure. I have never driven a Ferrari. It would seem to me that they are two different animals. One is an occasion of an older time. A throwback to sporty gentlemanly Grand Touring. The other is an occasion of doing it in a modern way. Faster and overall it is probably better in every way. Except, that the 330 is probably more of an occasion for the senses. More engaging. Imo. After watching I stand with my viewpoint. The Lusso makes muvh more sense to me. But, the 330 stirs something deep inside of my 57 year old soul. I can imagine a tingle coming over me as I approach her for a drive together. Preferably just the two of us.
330GT 2+2, please.
I am wondering if age comes into this?
I was a teenager when the 330GT was new and was totally besotted by its bigger sister the SF500 Superfast when I met it and was driven in one in 1966.
Younger people may prefer the GTC4 Lusso as they may not have the knowledge and experience of the earlier car for comparison.
I nearly bought an SF500 before I got this 330, I was looking at a 365 Superfast too.
Lusso's a do-everything practical machine with that N/A imperious V12 and rear-biased four wheel drive.
The GT's also practical in terms of accommodation and comfort but with the addition of sensational classic design.
Both have excellent qualities in terms of driver involvement and sound.
The GT's 300 horse power and 150 mph is still an awful lot of performance for the public highway if not of the comparatively lightning-quick level of the Lusso. Probably also needs very high levels of specialist servicing to keep it sweet but it also demands much higher skills to drive very fast.
The GT wins for sheer visual theatre. A true thoroughbred from a golden era.
You can’t go wrong with either car, they are both right, it’s now down to better affordability, use and practicality.
Wow, tough choice! But I’d have to take the old one.
Have to take the Lusso with that sound track
Why do you go from 1st to 3rd gear just because the engine isn’t warm, yet?!
More due to a cold trans, hard to get 2nd
@@ahemgee9542 I see. Thanks for clearing that up!
Reluctant 2nd gear when cold was a Ferrari thing on virtually all models from the early 60's (maybe earlier) through the late 90's when they first introduced F1 (paddle-shifting) on the 355 (where it had to be fixed because skipping 2nd wasn't possible). It should only take about 10 minutes of driving on the 330GT for 2nd gear to be fine. It takes about 20 minutes of driving for the engine oil to come up to full operating temperature.
@@michaelpsmusic I see. Thanks for the information! 🙂
@@pacovl46 There is a Brad Paisley song video where the premise is that he takes William Shatner's 355 out for a drive without him knowing and Brad complains about 2nd gear sticking a little when he's caught. William Shatner's response was "You found 2nd gear??? How'd you do that??". Very much of an inside joke, but pretty funny. This is the video -> ua-cam.com/video/B9mpDAJOPac/v-deo.html
330 GT for sure. Ferrari is about the emotions and the old lady just does it best for me.
More please!!!
Another pairing coming soon
It's a shame Ferrari don't do retro models that look and feel old school, but use modern components and technology. That would be a good middle ground.
My two favourites (if you exclude a few German cars from the list...).
Great video! Who would want to be a self-indulgent wiener when you could be a connoisseur. 330 every single time. The modern one doesn’t get a look in from me. Turn up anywhere if the 330 and you are a legend - turn up somewhere in a modern Ferrari and you are just a bit of a flash fucker. And I know which one I would rather be.
330 is definitely the most beautiful and as you say, turn up anywhere in that and you will be loved. Pure class
Lusso, perfect all rounder, really not feeling the 330 😬😬😬
It’s far too cool for a man of your taste 👀😂
I know that the Ferrari GTC4 Lusso is one the most complete all rounders from the Brand which is a good choice, but I reckon that the Ferrari 330 just that nostalgic connection that you can't get in the new one's. For it's age is very ahead of his time which makes it a wise choice just not in value, also because it's a rare model.
WHAT ON EARTH has Pete been doing to his Lusso? Is that a huge dent/gash in the door near the handle? And he's kerbed the alloys too. What a yobbo. He needs to get back in his Nova!
Haha It’s his daily and uses it in that way.
@@scdDoes he work in a quarry?! I am insanely jealous of course, something is going right if you're able to daily a new Ferrari and look after an old one. Good on him, and thanks for the video!
I'd Go For The 1966 Ferrari.
3:54 so we are gonna casually ack like the Daytona in the background fallowing wasn't special ??
No comparison, the 66 is beautiful and the new ferrari although a fantastic driving car it sure is fugly. 🤟
Fair enough!
wow
330 for sure. You don't want a Ferrari as your everyday car, there are plenty of cars out there with reasonable performance that can get you around in style and comfort. A Ferrari should be a thing of beauty, a rolling sculpture that gets used on special occasions. A piece of escapism from the drudgery of life. When it becomes an everyday car you bring it down to the same level of daily drudgery like everything else, sitting at traffic lights, trying to find parking spots, stop start city driving .........ughhh!!
I'd take ANY 1960's era car over the junk companies put out today.
4:10 599 GTO 🤩
330 hands down, shear cool
330 GT for me.
I owned a 330gt for about 20 years and put 30,000 miles on it. I loved it but, the maintenance on a Ferrari of that era was a killer. Close to $3 a mile on rebuilding absolutely everything multiple times. There really is nothing practical about it. Plus the car gets quite hot in the summer. Most people who own Ferraris of this vintage actually use them sparingly. Either their worried about the cars value or they don’t find it makes sense for many long trips with out a ride along mechanic. Loved loved the car, hated how many times I ended up on a tow truck. One more thing the 330 2 +2 handles great for a car of that era but is a poor handling car compared to the 2 seat Ferraris. The engine is quite heavy and the car tends to plow if you really push it.
100% I'd buy the 1966 car (assuming I could of course). And the reason is simple. Nobody is going to key scratch a 1966 masterpiece. Even the hardest cold-hearted scumbag would look at the 1966 car and think "Nah, put the key away, I can't do it." But the Lusso would be getting key scratched every day.
Just HASto be.....the 66 330....its a foregone conclusion in my subjective view...
how are they worth the same?
i don´t get it
the oldtimer should be more worth imo
If the Lusso is a marmite car, I definitely love marmite 😍
Neither, my 412 GTi (manual) is a better compromise. Enough classic feel, Pininfarina style and last of the Colombo V12s.... But if I had to choose, the 330 GT every time; that Lusso is soooo ugly
Ferrari 330 GT ❤
The 330GT is far ahead from the GTC4
I think the Lusso is a fabulous car, but it can't hold a candle to the 330GT, you can't build that kind of character in any car today, there is little to no passion these days, cars are based on how many usb's and nonsense
Lusso is debatably ugly. If you have to have a modern sole less car get the Roma
330 a masterpiece, and... the 330 gtc is one of the most beautiful Ferraris ever. The Gtc4 is one of the worst looking ones imho. Ps 3:53 and 4:53 look at the back of the Car
It is its horrible , its like a stetched wheelbase vw scirocco with a pug 407 coupe front slapped on it , horrible looking thing
And yet I think it’s one of the nicest looking Ferrari’s in my collection. It’s certainly one of the best driving cars of modern times.
@@2manycars713 thats fine , each to their own , we all have our own opinions , but don't tell me I dont know what im talking about because I dont share your opinion on a car . I think its a horrible design regardless of what ever branding it has on it .
@@paulthomson9709 what do you drive?
@@paulthomson9709 actually I’m not even bothered, you don’t like the car that’s fine. But you still don’t know what your talking about, you’re just giving your opinions on what you think ‘looks’ nice.
That new lusso is horrible looking , ferrari really have lost their way in design .
It’s a revised version of the FF which has been around for years and it’s a great car. Ferrari made a master piece with that car so I’m sorry pal but you don’t know what you’re talking about.
@@2manycars713 yes im well aware of the ff , didn't like that either , yeh not denying the fact its a good car ,.I just personally don't like them .
@@2manycars713 the ff gets credited as ferraris first 4 wheel drive car but it wasn't there was a 408 built back in the 80s looked abit like a cross between a Honda nsx and Ford rs200 , this was there first 4 wheel drive car , but was cancelled , this 4rm 4 wheel drive system was then developed for the ff . But being a 4 seat ferrari it follow the 400 series , 456 and 612 and become a fairly cheap way to own a v12 ferrari . The overly complicated 4 wheel drive system will be horrendous when it needs replacing though .
@@paulthomson9709 Yes I’m aware of the 408 RM but this was just a prototype so it doesn’t count. I wouldn’t say it’s a cheap way to own a V12 Ferrari, I paid £304,000 for mine. If you want a cheap V12 you could buy a 400/412i/Testatossa/512TR/512LM/456/550/575/612/FF/F12 all of these are cheaper than the GTC4 but nowhere near as good. And the Lusso is so well developed that I wouldn’t worry about their 4 wheel drive system. I know of guys that have smashed 60,000kms on there Lusso’s without a single problem. Just like mine, not a single problem. And with the 4 year warranty that can be extended if needed, and the free 7 years servicing I really wouldn’t worry. But above all this, no matter what, I don’t worry about what ‘could’ go wrong, because it probably won’t and if it did then Ferrari would fix it because they wouldn’t want to lose face. And you know what I’m going to buy when I come to get rid of my GTC4 Lusso? Another GTC4 Lusso because they’re just that good.
@@2manycars713 you like them thats fine , I dont like the look of them so I won't buy one , regardless of how good they are .