Glad to see someone testing with a “realistic “ pc build, although I would have used a i5 at the very least, but anyway, I would love to see more 4k game play yes yes everyone and his uncle claims it’s a 1440p gpu but dam, it will play at 4k and NOT every game needs 60fps or higher to be enjoyable!
Do you have any option to check the power consumption after the recent drivers? That's one thing I'm curious about the most, the idle consumption was a mess when the card came out, then someone found some workaround in BIOS to put at least 750's consumption in check, but no info about 770. Does it still draw so much power on idle?
Just the video I was looking for. But Intel Arc is getting there. Maybe next generation they can match the 3060 Ti or 3070. It looks to be one great card.
The potential is there, just check the performace in Hogwarts Legacy, even at 1440p runs awesome, in comparison the RTX 3000s family is getting cut (on purpose it seems) for his low gddr memory.
Interesting, I thought the A770 would be better than the 3060TI with the new drivers at that point. Lets see if they can improve even more in the next quarter with upcoming drivers.
I've seen other UA-cam videos where it shows the A770 beating the 3060ti, and closer to the 3070. I'm not sure what's going on, but this other video mentioned that to take full advantage of an A770, you need the newer Intel GPU, like the 13900K, 32gs of RAM, and a highend Z690, or Z790 motherboard. Okay, well. I think with that much amount of $$$, I'll buy me an 4070ti instead. I hope Intel can come-up with drivers to put it in mid to high end GPU. They might need to re-engineer the graphics card for that. A780?
the driver update targeted dx9, indeed as you said at the final part of the video your choice of games was not the most optimal. The majority of gamers do not treat games as benchmark tools they just want to play them and have fun, and a lot of people are playing old games that were not running great on arc but now they do. The presentation of intel remarked that and to be honest they are right games like csgo are important
I did test 3 games with ray tracing in the previous video, even though they are the older drivers after a retest I didn't see a difference in performance 🙂
@@thebcwonder4850 I only used dlss and fsr 2.1 on cyberpunk at 1440p and with ray tracing enabled at native, both cards could not hit 30 fps. Honestly I think dlss is only very slightly superior in upscaling, but I think AMD's is much more consumer friendly as you can use it with any card. As for ray tracing I actually think Arc might be better, in the sense that if both cards could hit the exact same fps without RT on (or very close) then I think once enabled, arc would have better RT on performance.
Glad to see someone testing with a “realistic “ pc build, although I would have used a i5 at the very least, but anyway, I would love to see more 4k game play yes yes everyone and his uncle claims it’s a 1440p gpu but dam, it will play at 4k and NOT every game needs 60fps or higher to be enjoyable!
Agree. I did have a look at it just at 4k in this video 🙂 ua-cam.com/video/WCUnvF1b16w/v-deo.html
I really hope they add VR support for thr A770 and that Oculus starts supporting it as well. If they do that, Intel has me sold!
hope to se dxvk comparison ^^
did you enable rebar? These results seem quite off to my experience, i usually get almost the same or better perf than my 60 ti
Enable Rebar is the requirement. It literally says that on the box of Intel Arc.
The rebar is fundamental, without that I did 50fps on Minecraft
2:08
You might want to show some b roll clips when talking about the test PC, I see a lot of potential in you 😃
Awesome video
Do you have any option to check the power consumption after the recent drivers? That's one thing I'm curious about the most, the idle consumption was a mess when the card came out, then someone found some workaround in BIOS to put at least 750's consumption in check, but no info about 770. Does it still draw so much power on idle?
I never noticed crazy power draw while idle :)
Mine (770) is running between 30-40w when i do nothing. Hope it answer you question :).
thanks for your videos
Thanks for watching
Just the video I was looking for. But Intel Arc is getting there. Maybe next generation they can match the 3060 Ti or 3070. It looks to be one great card.
Beat the 4080. Next gen should be
The potential is there, just check the performace in Hogwarts Legacy, even at 1440p runs awesome, in comparison the RTX 3000s family is getting cut (on purpose it seems) for his low gddr memory.
Much appreciated
You should retest with the 4146 drivers
the best would be to test esports or games like world of tanks aka free games
Good idea
Interesting, I thought the A770 would be better than the 3060TI with the new drivers at that point. Lets see if they can improve even more in the next quarter with upcoming drivers.
I've seen other UA-cam videos where it shows the A770 beating the 3060ti, and closer to the 3070. I'm not sure what's going on, but this other video mentioned that to take full advantage of an A770, you need the newer Intel GPU, like the 13900K, 32gs of RAM, and a highend Z690, or Z790 motherboard. Okay, well. I think with that much amount of $$$, I'll buy me an 4070ti instead. I hope Intel can come-up with drivers to put it in mid to high end GPU. They might need to re-engineer the graphics card for that. A780?
@@marsflee3815 The latest driver updates focused mainly on Dx9 games, the ones tested here were either dx10 or dx11
arc a770 is a good card vs the rtx 3060 (no ti) and rx 6600 (no xt)
Isn’t it being compared to the 3060 ti and the 6700xt while the 750 is being compared to the 3060
@@DelScully no, not yet but if intel finds some crazy solutions with their drivers then who knows
the driver update targeted dx9, indeed as you said at the final part of the video your choice of games was not the most optimal. The majority of gamers do not treat games as benchmark tools they just want to play them and have fun, and a lot of people are playing old games that were not running great on arc but now they do. The presentation of intel remarked that and to be honest they are right games like csgo are important
You could add the fps counter of the previous driver to be more comparable without a hassle
I thought about it but since I saw no change from the previous drivers apart for in warhammer 3 which gained 10 fps average, I didn't see the point.
I need to ask where the poster behind him came from.
I got it in Japan from a store called B-side label. I think they have an online store that ships outside Japan 😊
@@tomstechtable thanks, I'll look into it
Could you test RT performance?
I did test 3 games with ray tracing in the previous video, even though they are the older drivers after a retest I didn't see a difference in performance 🙂
@@tomstechtable do you think the lead is mostly due to DLSS being a better upscaling technology or the 3060ti having better RT?
@@thebcwonder4850 I only used dlss and fsr 2.1 on cyberpunk at 1440p and with ray tracing enabled at native, both cards could not hit 30 fps. Honestly I think dlss is only very slightly superior in upscaling, but I think AMD's is much more consumer friendly as you can use it with any card. As for ray tracing I actually think Arc might be better, in the sense that if both cards could hit the exact same fps without RT on (or very close) then I think once enabled, arc would have better RT on performance.
Thanfs Tom... mam druink now, mate.
😂
Ok let's see. So this card is slower than my 3060Ti that I paid less for 2 years ago 🤣