Carbon Nanotubes for Digital Logic

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @budcarr8673
    @budcarr8673 5 років тому +1

    This was awesome ! Kudos to the speaker and next time you look at the cost of a processor, remember what goes into building them. The vast majority of people can't comprehend how difficult it really is. This helps bring that to light.

  • @michelferreira333
    @michelferreira333 8 років тому +2

    Thank you for the info. Every change is a little challenging but I think we will make it.

  • @badpennylocker5097
    @badpennylocker5097 8 років тому +2

    good stuff, keep up the good work. Who will be the first Billionaire from Carbon computing?

  • @jamesshelburn5825
    @jamesshelburn5825 6 років тому

    magnetic recoil chambers in circuits reverse polarity ?

  • @PeterBacon
    @PeterBacon Рік тому

    It seems to me that fullerenes and carbon nanotubes are only the humble beginnings to high torsion nanotechnology.

  • @swarupsarangi734
    @swarupsarangi734 7 років тому +1

    loved it !

  • @tableno5335
    @tableno5335 6 років тому

    Does anyone know how to add cntfet into ADS (advanced design system) ?

  • @kendrashedenhelm962
    @kendrashedenhelm962 9 років тому

    Fantastic!

  • @dongillee378
    @dongillee378 8 років тому

    Very useful lecture

  • @napoleon_bonaparte2462
    @napoleon_bonaparte2462 8 років тому +1

    I don't think bottom up is as silly as he makes it sound, the human brain is built this way.

  • @jonathanozik5442
    @jonathanozik5442 9 років тому +1

    Bravo!

  • @Vermilicious
    @Vermilicious 7 років тому +1

    IBM staying relevant. Fascinating technology. More use of chemistry seems to be unavoidable at that scale. Eventually, I assume biochemistry is going to take over. Nature has probably found a better way a long time ago, just look at the brain.

  • @darkashes9953
    @darkashes9953 5 років тому

    they will have to shrink the Carbon nanotubes even smaller than what they have made in 2019 to get 32 bits or 32/64 bits

  • @technologicalsingularity1788
    @technologicalsingularity1788 8 років тому +2

    singularity is near

  • @tpowell453
    @tpowell453 8 років тому

    The explanation at the beginning was useless. To someone like myself, I already know about MOSFETs. To someone who's not in the industry, you blew through that so fast that it actually had no value. Either explain something, or don't. But don't just rush through crap like that super fast and casually. It's not simple, and it shouldn't be treated as such. Why not just say, "You guys already know about MOSFETs, so I'm not going to cover it here." ?

    • @Knezicdex
      @Knezicdex 8 років тому +1

      I partially agree. I think its useful to people that didn't think about those things for years so a fast refresh of basic theory was useful.

    • @neutrallybiassed1330
      @neutrallybiassed1330 6 років тому

      Ima SuperPerson, it is important to brush on a concept so the future idea has handles to hold. I don't know if you have life experience enough to know about simple things like a hot pot in a fire but it helps when there are handles to grab it. Rather than reaching in and dropping the soup all over the floor handles are attached so that people without a specialized pot grabber(tm) can remove it and eat.