King David Was A Real Person! w/ Dr. John Bergsma

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 лип 2024
  • 📺 Full Episode: • YES! The Bible is Reli...
    Dr. Bergsma talks about small things in the Gospels that would be nearly impossible if the authors were not who the Church says they are.
    Clip Sponsor: stpaulcenter.com/matt
    🟣 Join Us on Locals (before we get banned on YT): mattfradd.locals.com/
    🖥️ Website: pintswithaquinas.com/
    🟢 Rumble: rumble.com/c/pintswithaquinas
    👕 Merch: shop.pintswithaquinas.com
    🚫 FREE 21 Day Detox From Porn Course: www.strive21.com/
    🔵 Facebook: / mattfradd
    📸 Instagram: / mattfradd
    We get a small kick back from affiliate links.
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 121

  • @justinsmitley7619
    @justinsmitley7619 11 місяців тому +63

    Of course he was a real person LOL they found the city of David and the exact location where David defeated Goliath using the Bible as a map. Perfect Details.

  • @BlueBusssss
    @BlueBusssss 11 місяців тому +34

    Glad this showed up in my feed today. I just finished 1 Samuel this morning.

    • @jackdaniels5626
      @jackdaniels5626 11 місяців тому +1

      Naked Bible Podcast is currently discussing 1 Samuel, each verse has an episode. So much to talk about.

    • @name-ni3jc
      @name-ni3jc 11 місяців тому

      God Bless you, keep going and God's word will be a light to your path :)

  • @truthovertea
    @truthovertea 11 місяців тому +47

    Finally someone other than just Joel Kramer mentions the Moabite stone with the house of David reference

    • @Ramoreira86
      @Ramoreira86 11 місяців тому +1

      Tel Dan's stele?

    • @truthovertea
      @truthovertea 11 місяців тому +3

      @@Ramoreira86 no the Moabite stone is not the same as the Tel Dan stele, it’s a different artifact

  • @ntmn8444
    @ntmn8444 11 місяців тому +35

    Of course he’s real. His burial site is in Jerusalem. I actually would like to visit his tomb and the tomb of the patriarchs. It’s disappointing that most Christian tours do not visit these places. I get that the focus is on Jesus, but it would also be really freaking cool to visit the OT sites.

    • @lionzion1879
      @lionzion1879 11 місяців тому +1

      😅😅 yeah that's definitely king Davids burial site.

    • @nathanwhite704
      @nathanwhite704 11 місяців тому

      There's 3 churches and a mosque that claim to have the head of John the Baptist. If you believe we know where Davids tomb is you're just hopeless, grasping at straws to hold on to your fairytales.

    • @ntmn8444
      @ntmn8444 10 місяців тому +4

      @@lionzion1879 it even says it in the OT where he was buried. He’s exactly there, in the old city. You’re just a hater.

    • @lionzion1879
      @lionzion1879 10 місяців тому

      @@ntmn8444 hater of no evidence.
      Old city of what?

    • @ntmn8444
      @ntmn8444 10 місяців тому +1

      @@lionzion1879 wow so you’re ignorant, not only of history but also geography. 🤦‍♀️ there’s a part of Jerusalem called the old city. That’s where David is buried. Travel a little more, read some more. That’s the only way to cure ignorance, hater.

  • @aonati2856
    @aonati2856 11 місяців тому +39

    There's a book in my library that puts forth the idea that King David was a soldier and usurper to the throne, and thus the whole of the books of Samuel and Kings are the cover up story to give him validity to be king. I found this and just thought: "You know... the whole point of boiling the frog slowly is to keep it unaware of what you're doing. This is just dropping it in with the pot bubbling over.".

    • @helwrecht1637
      @helwrecht1637 11 місяців тому +33

      Also why would a cover up label David to make such horrible mistakes and sins and his children to be awful people

    • @Davidjune1970
      @Davidjune1970 11 місяців тому +5

      Why would any text saying it was so be any more believable. Especially if it’s a theory centuries or millennia after

    • @BoaConstrictor126
      @BoaConstrictor126 10 місяців тому

      The crazy thing is there's no evidence of that theory yet mainstream academia always talks about burden of proof

    • @consulmollard
      @consulmollard 10 місяців тому

      So you read a book about a false story of king David… Then you perpetuate that false story as real! You are just as foolish as the author of that book you read!!!

    • @ntmn8444
      @ntmn8444 10 місяців тому +2

      That sounds like it was written by someone who sympathized with Saul.

  • @reminders8657
    @reminders8657 11 місяців тому +6

    “Travelers ne’er did lie, though fools at home condemn them.” -Shakespeare (Temptest, Act 3, Sc 3)

  • @RestoringReality
    @RestoringReality 11 місяців тому +20

    I'm more convinced King David was real than I am Napoleon Bonaparte.

  • @steelmongoose4956
    @steelmongoose4956 11 місяців тому +15

    Great discussion, and great channel. I’m learning a lot here. God bless.

    • @steelmongoose4956
      @steelmongoose4956 11 місяців тому +4

      @@ThomasCrown-mf8lb I’m touched that your concern for my understanding extends all the way to fear, but you needn’t worry yourself on my account.

  • @J-PLeigh8409
    @J-PLeigh8409 11 місяців тому +9

    This would be just a bit problematic for the Genealogy of our Lord in relation to being the Son of David thru Saint Joseph & Saint Mary, & the Kingship of Israel

    • @OrthodoxInquirer
      @OrthodoxInquirer 11 місяців тому +5

      Good point! This is probably the real reason people said David wasn't real. Satan wants to undercut faith from every side. Anything related to Christ has to be denied by evil people.

  • @ericpeterson8732
    @ericpeterson8732 11 місяців тому +8

    History Channel had an awful show that basically reimagined Moses as a mercanary leader who led his people out of Egypt and every victory the Israelites had was due to guerilla tactics, not Divine Providence. And King David was more of crime boss than a king. It made so mad!

    • @bc4evernow
      @bc4evernow 11 місяців тому +4

      History channel is all you needed to say. What a joke of Media

  • @kzbaby2002
    @kzbaby2002 11 місяців тому +12

    How could he be fake? Then Jesus would be fake. He is of the House of David and that’s a very important aspect of his genealogy.

    • @nathanwhite704
      @nathanwhite704 11 місяців тому +6

      Not necessarily we know for certain that neither Abraham nor Moses ever existed yet we have evidence for the kings of Israel after David. Theres only a single piece of evidence for David and nothing about his exploits at all.

    • @kevinkelly2162
      @kevinkelly2162 11 місяців тому

      You are so close.

    • @kzbaby2002
      @kzbaby2002 11 місяців тому +1

      @@nathanwhite704 Oh really now? For certain? Says who?

    • @keondakuhhh69
      @keondakuhhh69 11 місяців тому

      @@kzbaby2002probably the descendants of the people who said it was IMPOSSIBLE for humans to fly and that the earth is flat. Always verify with multiple sources and remember there are evangelical atheists and heretics with a burning hatred for Christ and his Church.

    • @nathanwhite704
      @nathanwhite704 11 місяців тому

      @@kzbaby2002 Every legitimate scholar ever since at least the 1970's, even the Christian and Jewish ones.

  • @johncopper5128
    @johncopper5128 11 місяців тому +1

    Thank you.

  • @au8363
    @au8363 11 місяців тому +4

    Glory To The Triune GOD

  • @francismcglynn4169
    @francismcglynn4169 11 місяців тому +2

    “Some people attribute value to the attitude of stubborn adherence as such (adherence to an idea, or to an intellectual milieu, in particular). Yet in reality it is adherence to truth and to genuine values only which is good; adherence to errors is a bad thing. What claims our faithfulness is the presence of genuine values. Fidelity is but a manifestation of that continuity by virtue of which we pay consideration to the immutability and the eternal significance of truth and of the world of values.” [Dietrich von Hildebrand, Transformation in Christ: On the Christian Attitude (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2001), 25.[

  • @cormacgreene8505
    @cormacgreene8505 11 місяців тому +34

    Plato wasn’t a real people. He was created by the Greek tourist board in the nineteenth century to increase tourism in Greece at the time.😊😊😊

    • @conovan5081
      @conovan5081 11 місяців тому +2

      Facts!

    • @cormacgreene8505
      @cormacgreene8505 11 місяців тому

      @@conovan5081 I made a spelling mistake. Sorry. What do you mean by facts

    • @UnremarkableMarx
      @UnremarkableMarx 11 місяців тому +1

      Play Dough

    • @michaelkelleypoetry
      @michaelkelleypoetry 11 місяців тому +4

      Then who wrote The Republic? Who wrote The Symposium? Who wrote The Timaeus and Critaeus? Both Plato and King David were real people. Saying either wasn't is just ignorant.

    • @TheySt0leMyUserName
      @TheySt0leMyUserName 11 місяців тому +5

      THAT GREEK PHILOSOPHER OVER THERE ISN'T REAL

  • @MikeHalk100
    @MikeHalk100 11 місяців тому

    6:15: Acutally King Mesha is first mentioned in *2 King 3:4.*

  • @domagojandrijanic5085
    @domagojandrijanic5085 11 місяців тому

    Thanks Mat

  • @Ginger_FoxxVT
    @Ginger_FoxxVT 10 місяців тому

    Fascinating

  • @johnericson7086
    @johnericson7086 11 місяців тому

    I'm just here for the Emmaus Academy ad.

  • @Mazvec
    @Mazvec 11 місяців тому +1

    Ads in the MIDDLE of the video? 🤨

  • @julielabrecque6416
    @julielabrecque6416 11 місяців тому

    Awesonme.

  • @regisjohnson9249
    @regisjohnson9249 11 місяців тому

    Dope

  • @XokrissXo
    @XokrissXo 11 місяців тому

    ❤❤

  • @bandie9101
    @bandie9101 11 місяців тому +1

    jumpscare in 3 … 2 … I mean Mattscare :)

  • @marcelmolenaar5684
    @marcelmolenaar5684 11 місяців тому +1

    King David has a statue in Georgia for a reason... and goliath are byildings that still stands

  • @thanksfernuthin
    @thanksfernuthin 10 місяців тому +1

    I can't hear "Moab" without thinking "Mother Of All Bombs". Sorry.

  • @aaronwood8012
    @aaronwood8012 11 місяців тому +4

    There’s no question the kings of ancient Israel existed - it’s ridiculous to deny it

  • @bensondavido4525
    @bensondavido4525 9 місяців тому

    For the same reason the Greeks talked about the wife of Hector.

  • @takmaps
    @takmaps 11 місяців тому +16

    Youd have to jump through hoops to try and assert he was a myth

    • @harrygarris6921
      @harrygarris6921 11 місяців тому

      It’s conspiracist nonsense. Actively arguing against the evidence we have because they don’t like the conclusions it leads to.

    • @kevinkelly2162
      @kevinkelly2162 11 місяців тому +1

      His story comes from a big book full of myths. Why should we believe his story is the one true one in the book of myths?

    • @delishme2
      @delishme2 11 місяців тому

      ​@@kevinkelly2162Wow you know so little about what you are talking about. It's a lot of different literary styles but most of it doesn't come under the term myth. Israel is literally filled to the brim with the archaeology as are it's neighbours. Why are you here ? Do you need a hug ? 🤷🏼‍♀️

    • @mmyr8ado.360
      @mmyr8ado.360 11 місяців тому +5

      ​@@kevinkelly2162 Archeological evidence? If you can't even deem preserved ancient text to be reliable, surely physical indication of a person's existence such as what Dr. Bergsma gave would suffice.

    • @kevinkelly2162
      @kevinkelly2162 11 місяців тому

      Anybody can write anything down. Are you suggesting we should believe all preserved ancient texts?And to believe the whole David story yes I would require more than 'a physical indication of a persons existance'. New York is not proof that Spiderman is real.@@mmyr8ado.360

  • @wesurvivedcastledunboy9571
    @wesurvivedcastledunboy9571 11 місяців тому +2

    Isn’t it recorded he had red hair?

    • @matthewposton3243
      @matthewposton3243 11 місяців тому +3

      He is ruddy with a fine appearance and handsome features according to 1 Samuel 16 which I always took to mean he had rosy cheeks or something. As if he was full of life lol

    • @SaintCharbelMiracleworker
      @SaintCharbelMiracleworker 11 місяців тому

      There are many red-haired jews.

    • @ntmn8444
      @ntmn8444 11 місяців тому

      @@matthewposton3243no, his skin was reddish tone, not just merely rosy cheeks, because no, he wasn’t white. But also, he was a red head. I imagine him and Solomon both as red heads with green eyes and everything, but a sun tanned skin look.

  • @Harmelcon
    @Harmelcon 10 місяців тому

    Ah yes, the Stele Dan (rimshot).

  • @chadalexander1924
    @chadalexander1924 10 місяців тому

    Not to mention, the majority of the Psalms were written by David. A lot of them, if you put them under the scrutiny of the Old Testament, were almost blasphemous. They couldn't have been written by a commoner because they would have been ex-communicated from the community and a priest would be reluctant to write with such fervor. The only person who could get away with that sort of writing would have to be a King.

  • @jeremiahreed702
    @jeremiahreed702 11 місяців тому

    What role did African people play in the Bible?

  • @davewilson6313
    @davewilson6313 11 місяців тому

    I dove on the grenade and liked the video, making the count 666.

  • @consulmollard
    @consulmollard 10 місяців тому

    The Bible is the word of the MOST HIGH GOD! The Bible is entirely factual! You either believe it or you don’t. There is no middle ground!!!

  • @awesomeoperators2796
    @awesomeoperators2796 11 місяців тому +2

    Why do these two even care about these things. They don't believe the old testament is applicable to them. 🤔

    • @c2s2942
      @c2s2942 3 місяці тому

      It’s the foundation that sets the stage for the Christian faith to begin through Christ.

  • @jacoblee5796
    @jacoblee5796 11 місяців тому +2

    David was an incredibly common name in ancient Israel. There very well probably was a king named David, probably more than one. That doesn't make what's wrote in the OT true. The reasoning used in this video is silly and that's putting it nicely.

    • @jeffscully1347
      @jeffscully1347 11 місяців тому +1

      And your qualifications in this area are . . .

    • @jacoblee5796
      @jacoblee5796 11 місяців тому +1

      @@jeffscully1347 I have to be qualified in a certain area to know David was a common name in ancient Israel? Do I need to be qualified in a certain area ti know Richard and Marie were common names in medieval Britain!?

    • @nathanwhite704
      @nathanwhite704 11 місяців тому +1

      @@jeffscully1347 The guy in this video seriously said that the Old Testament is a reliable source of history. it's the same as using Marvel Comics to prove Spider-Man is real that's how the bible is treated among legitimate scholars. David is in the category of legend and has been for over 50 years. Apologists=Propagandists.

    • @jeffscully1347
      @jeffscully1347 11 місяців тому

      @nathanwhite704 good luck with that.

    • @rebbrown7140
      @rebbrown7140 11 місяців тому +1

      ​@nathanwhite704 your argument needs better ammunition my friend. Marvel? Is there an inscription somewhere (in modern terms, official government pronouncement) that refers to the "The House of Ironman"? I'm not saying your conclusion is wrong (though I have serious doubts about it btw) but you need to come up with a better example.