Thank you. Do you still have FP-90x or Numa X GT is your only MIDI controller? Is it better than FP-90x or a dedicated MIDI controller? Thank you, Michael
Hi. I have chosen the Numa X GT over the FP90X to use as my piano and midi controller. It works better for me. The action feels lighter and more responsive. I also like the way it handles the midi implementation better. The touch settings are way more flexible. The Numa allows for individual key editing. The main negative is the internal piano sounds. I don't find them very authentic. However, they blend nicely with the other internal sounds. And the other internal sounds are really nice also. Overall it's a better instrument for me. Better action, better features, and better midi adjustments.
@@Comfort_One_Another Thank you. I am always trying to reference how the digital piano action feels to Yamaha C7 grand. After all this is the only acoustic piano I play. The downweight of the keys is not adjusted perfectly so I am not really looking for very precise (individual) adjustment of touch settings. I use VSL Bosendorfer 280VC, Garritan CFX and Pianoteq (Stainways, Bechstein and Petrof). I am always using any digital piano as a MIDI controller so I have no interest in many built in sounds. I do not want to pay for anything I do not use. I did not find any good, uncomplicated MIDI controller either. I recently used P-225 with GHC action but I got annoyed by its springiness and I (again) got Roland FP-10. My main problem with PHA-4 is not its downweight (this one is actually only 60g on C4) but its clicking noise. How is the noise and bounciness of Fatar TP400 WOOD? Thank you again, Michael
Wonderful, David!. Next step is singing and playing same time 😅 (I say this because I struggle doing it!)
Hi.
It's harder for me to sing sitting down due to restricted diaphragm mobility. Also, the sensitive condenser mic would pickup unwanted key noises.
Thank you. Do you still have FP-90x or Numa X GT is your only MIDI controller? Is it better than FP-90x or a dedicated MIDI controller?
Thank you,
Michael
Hi. I have chosen the Numa X GT over the FP90X to use as my piano and midi controller. It works better for me. The action feels lighter and more responsive. I also like the way it handles the midi implementation better. The touch settings are way more flexible. The Numa allows for individual key editing. The main negative is the internal piano sounds. I don't find them very authentic. However, they blend nicely with the other internal sounds. And the other internal sounds are really nice also. Overall it's a better instrument for me. Better action, better features, and better midi adjustments.
@@Comfort_One_Another Thank you. I am always trying to reference how the digital piano action feels to Yamaha C7 grand. After all this is the only acoustic piano I play. The downweight of the keys is not adjusted perfectly so I am not really looking for very precise (individual) adjustment of touch settings. I use VSL Bosendorfer 280VC, Garritan CFX and Pianoteq (Stainways, Bechstein and Petrof). I am always using any digital piano as a MIDI controller so I have no interest in many built in sounds. I do not want to pay for anything I do not use. I did not find any good, uncomplicated MIDI controller either. I recently used P-225 with GHC action but I got annoyed by its springiness and I (again) got Roland FP-10. My main problem with PHA-4 is not its downweight (this one is actually only 60g on C4) but its clicking noise. How is the noise and bounciness of Fatar TP400 WOOD?
Thank you again,
Michael
Wow David, I didn't know you can also sing. Really good!!!
Thanks David. That means a lot coming from you. Praise the Lord!