Alberto Ginastera: Quartetto per Archi No.1, Op.20 (1948)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 29

  • @hectorbarrionuevo6034
    @hectorbarrionuevo6034 5 років тому +4

    This is brilliant writing for strings! There is not a dull, tiring moment, not even in the slow sections. Most of the piece is energetic and the music remains highly dissonant. I don’t know if every movement has long-term, tonal center goals, in this quartet, but the music has a wonderful logic. Loved this splendid quartet ! Long live dissonance … and consonance!

  • @rocio3001
    @rocio3001 2 роки тому +1

    El Maestro Ginastera, orgullo latinoamericano.

  • @kuang-licheng402
    @kuang-licheng402 8 років тому +6

    a great composer

  • @notaire2
    @notaire2 5 років тому

    Spannende Interpretation dieses modernen und technisch anspruchsvollen Streichquartetts im rhythmischen Tempo mit gut artikulierten und perfekt vereinigten Töne aller Instrumente. Die Virtuosität vierer Solisten ist echt erstaunlich. Atemberaubend vom Anfang bis zum Ende!

  • @johnpcomposer
    @johnpcomposer 2 роки тому

    This and the harp concerto so far are my favorite Ginastera works. Was not as happy with his serialist stuff, but as with so many modern composers they compose in a number of styles and this one suits my tastes. Love dissonance and unusual harmonies.

  • @FedericoAlbano
    @FedericoAlbano 11 років тому +3

    Waaaw Esto es genial..

  • @algeborusas1883
    @algeborusas1883 5 років тому +2

    Reflects well a post WWII sentiment.

  • @vincentstuart3148
    @vincentstuart3148 11 років тому +4

    masterpiece!!!!

  • @kuang-licheng402
    @kuang-licheng402 8 років тому +1

    very good

  • @SLOVENEMUSIC
    @SLOVENEMUSIC 12 років тому +3

    Ginastera's early opus focuses a lot on fast rhythms and Bartók-like elemental energy. His motifs are generally simple and good to develop in different directions. It also uses contrasts between modal diatonicism and atonal chromaticism.

    • @davidmehnert6206
      @davidmehnert6206 5 років тому +1

      Also strong serialist influences - and pointed retorts to them - evident in his early work. (The second movement of his Piano Sonata #1 is based on a tone row...)

  • @jamisondavid100
    @jamisondavid100 6 років тому +3

    Nice artwork by Antonio Berni. There's a guy who's been used for cover art by King Crimson who has a similar style, or should I say a derivative one.

  • @edwilliams9914
    @edwilliams9914 7 років тому +2

    Before looking at the credits, I was thinking "Hey this quartet has a really rich beautiful full sound PLUS incredible precision, fluidity, and 'feel' -- almost as good as Cuarteto Latino-Americano. I should see who they are" :-)

    • @LNcello
      @LNcello 7 років тому +1

      Same here! Fortunate to have heard them live ... incredible.

  • @sergiorp7599
    @sergiorp7599 11 років тому +2

    ese Ginastera era un loquillo

  • @kniazigor2276
    @kniazigor2276 7 років тому +3

    Quatuor intéressant du plus grand compositeur argentin, rappelant ceux de Villa-Lobos et de Britten (la partie avec les harmoniques naturelles de la corde en glissando à 10.27)

    • @didierschein8515
      @didierschein8515 6 років тому +2

      Moi je sens aussi la présence de Bartók.

  • @slateflash
    @slateflash 4 роки тому

    I've only just begun to notice the similarity between the first movement and the last movement of the Ravel quartet. Don't think this is a coincidence

  • @kniazigor2276
    @kniazigor2276 7 років тому

    Je faisais naturellement allusion dans mon précédent message au 3 ème quatuor de Britten, le plus réussi des trois.

  • @stueystuey1962
    @stueystuey1962 6 років тому +1

    i have nothing intelligent to say but hear all sorts of Dvorak not Bartok. This is actually quite interesting music. There is definitely that Slav thing going on including Janacek and Hilding Rosenberg. I also hear quite American sounds as well. But mostly Dvorak.

    • @akvaka
      @akvaka 5 років тому

      definitely not Dvorak

  • @maxcohen13
    @maxcohen13 10 років тому +3

    Why the hell is it that when someone doesn't have anything intelligent to say about a piece they immediately compare it to Bartok?
    Bartok sounds like folk music. Everything sounds like folk music...because it's _all_ folk music.

    • @slateflash
      @slateflash 8 років тому +2

      +maxcohen13 because in terms of it's use of the ostinato bassline it is similar to many quartets of Bartok but that is all. Also Bartok is not folk music; he merely developed on certain ideas in folk songs to create his own unique style

    • @maxcohen13
      @maxcohen13 8 років тому

      slateflash 1. I didn't say he was folk music. I said he _sounded like_ folk music, for obvious reasons.
      2. The ostinato has been a staple in Western music far before Bartok used it. Tying the concept to one composer is like associating the key of a minor to Mozart; it doesn't make sense.

    • @slateflash
      @slateflash 8 років тому +2

      maxcohen13 Yes, but how many composers have used the ostinato to THIS effect??

    • @juanquiroga8933
      @juanquiroga8933 6 років тому

      @@slateflash many contemporanean composers

    • @slateflash
      @slateflash 6 років тому +1

      @@juanquiroga8933 Before Bartók? Sure there have been ostinatos but i'm referring to how Bartók revolutionised the way they sound

  • @raticida123456
    @raticida123456 10 років тому +1

    muy feo no me gustó el primer movimiento, no feo, espantoso

    • @ricduca
      @ricduca 6 років тому +8

      Sería más lógico que expongas tu sensación subjetiva, como dices "no me gustó". Lo de feo o espantoso como verdad o generalización, está de más. Es respetable que no te guste, lógicamente. Eso no quiere decir que sea espantoso. Me suena una falta de respeto a un gran compositor como Ginastera