Seeing this pop up right when I opened UA-cam made me so happy. Facts/history/cryptids/legends/conspiracy videos of yours are my fav!!!! Much appreciation.
8 reasons to doubt the moon landing 1. The lunar module (LM) is not likely to have ever existed. Such a machine that can land on the moon with reverse rocket thrusters, then take off again with enough escape velocity to leave the moon and fly 70 miles to magically dock with another craft - is something from a sci fi movie, not real life. That such technology existed in the 1960s, or even now, is bonkers. Even more absurd is that it worked despite never having been tested. 6 times, without a glitch. Much lesser forms of technology have taken hundreds, if not thousands, of tries to get right. Furthermore, the blueprint for this miracle technology was destroyed and is no longer available. 2. Radiation kills. So says James Van Allen, and every other scientist who has considered the issue of sending men beyond earth’s orbit. Not only would the astronauts face significant radiation in the Van Allen belts, but would be at high risk during the entire trip outside of the belts, including while frolicking around on the moon. Studies suggest that radiation should’ve been much higher than reported among the astronauts, and can’t seem to explain why their alleged radiation intake was so low. The Artemis mission plans on testing radiation levels before embarking on its journey to the moon. Apparently the Apollo missions had no such concerns. NASA openly admits those astronauts had no protection from radiation. 3. Temperatures. You need equipment that can withstand the moon’s extreme temperatures. This includes spacesuits, rovers, batteries, the LM itself, cameras, and much more. A temperature range from -200 to + 200 is a tall task for any equipment, let alone in the 1960s. Allegedly the Apollo 11 mission only saw a temperature range of -63 to +150, but even then there exists an enormous chance of equipment failing in the extreme heat or cold. Heat or cold on the moon can also vary wildly depending on whether you’re in the sun or shade. Being able to auto-adapt in such conditions is a very tall task. 4. Photography. The pictures from the Apollo mission are, quite literally, unbelievable. Neil Armstrong has to be the most gifted photographer of all time. As Dave McGowan points out, to fully appreciate the shots he took, one should put on a pair of thick winter gloves and a motorcycle helmet and walk around the neighborhood snapping pictures at chest level, and see how they turn out. With no way to focus the lens or see what you’re taking a picture of, you’d be SOL when it comes to taking a good shot. But not Neil Armstrong - the guy can do it all. Also, there are no stars in the background when there clearly should’ve been. The moon has no atmosphere, thus the luminosity of stars is many times greater (the astronauts also claimed they don’t remember seeing stars). 5. Athletic ability. Prior to the alleged moon landings, scientists somewhat gleefully speculated what men may be able to do on the moon due to the reduced gravitational pull. Weighing only 1/6 of what they did on earth, there’d be an opportunity for some cool athletic feats. Even with bulky suits, the astronauts should’ve been jumping out of the gym. We’re talking at least 3, 4 feet high. Instead, they did lame bunny hops and never got more than ~18 inches off the ground. Also, what’s with them moving in slow mo? If you speed up the film, it basically just looks like men running around in the desert in space suits. 6. Miles per gallon. Outside of the fabled Apollo missions, the furthest any rocket has gotten from the earth is around 400 miles. One of the simplest reasons is...fuel. Duh. Pretty difficult to travel millions of miles without refilling. Debunkers always brush off this concern by saying you’re basically good once you leave earth’s atmosphere, and only need fuel to redirect your ship. They neglect the fact that the earth’s gravity is still acting on the ship while on its path to the moon, and furthermore fuel is needed for the maneuvers to get onto and off of the moon. At minimum a moon journey would require about 500,000 miles of travel, but in reality it would be much more. Apollo 17 traversed a distance of 1.6 million miles. Call me crazy, but I feel like that’d require a lot more fuel than a rocket can carry. 7. Prominent characters and their motivations. LBJ and Richard Nixon were not known for their honesty. Scandals plagued their administrations, and ultimately forced Nixon out of office. Their handling of the Vietnam war was a disaster; a distraction from their wrongdoing was necessary, and couldn’t have come at a better time. A successful moon landing could restore faith in government & provide a morale boost for the public. Neither president would have been above lying about such a thing to boost their approval. And as I laid out in a previous piece, the head of NASA at the time was an actual Nazi. 8. Awkward astronauts. The men who allegedly performed the incredible feat of moonwalking do not act triumphant. They act like people who just got away with a crime. Neil Armstrong had never given a sit down interview, and Buzz Aldrin punches people in the face when they challenge him on the subject. The press conference after the 3 astronauts returned from Apollo 11 will go down as one of the most bizarre & awkward of all time. They couldn’t answer the most basic of questions about their experience. 9. In 2020, Wikileaks downloaded NASA’s entire database. Included in that massive treasure trove of hard evidence of US Government criminality and corruption was a series of clips of the faked moon landing that NASA has denied for decades. The upshot of this stunning video evidence, that proves once and for all the transparent moon landing hoax, is that it casts a dark shadow on the entire Apollo Space Program-a program that would have cost nearly $300 billion in 2019. Only by watching the entire video-documentary above can anyone comprehend the sheer depth and breadth of this unparalleled hoax and deception. Nasa has faked every event and is a money laundering company with zero consideration for good American Citizens.
If man had the technology to send men to the moon in 1960s, why has no one even gone 400 miles from earth since?
10 reasons why you are wrong. 1. You’re doubting the existence of advanced technology in the 60’s because it’s the 60’s. I don’t think many of us could’ve predicted that we’d get advanced AI art in 2023, yet here we are. 2. The inner Van Allen belt reaches out 12,000 kilometers, and the outer belt about 60,000 kilometers. The Moon is 384,400 kilometers away from Earth. Dunno about you, but that seems to be way out of the Van Allen belt. 3. Again, back to point 1, you are denying that they did something because of the date. Astronauts literally had heaters in the suits to keep them warm, why do you think they would just go to space with nothing but a few bulky sheets of cloth. 4. The amazing photos can be chalked up to extremely good luck, but if you don’t accept that as the answer, everyone’s slow movement let the camera easily focus, with the added bonus of the only thing to focus on being the astronauts. The stars not being visible is quite simple. So you know how if you’re in a dark place, you can see stars in the night, but as soon as the location is lit, you see less stars? Well that’s because the human eye only sees things that are the brightest compared to the environment. That’s why there are no stars visible on the Moon, it’s because the Sun and Earth are the two brightest objects in the sky from your point of view. You see this every day actually. There are no stars visible during the day because of how bright the sun and sky are compared to everything else. 5. You said it yourself. Scientists SPECULATED that you could do crazy stuff on the Moon, but at the time it was just speculation. Imagine yourself as one of the first people to walk on the Moon. You have no idea how this place behaves, you have zero clue about what is gonna happen to you. Not to mention that the suits weighed about 81 kilograms with some important stuff inside. There was a bunch of fancy tech scattered all around the suit itself, like the aformentioned heaters, which if broken would mean the end of your life. It isn’t as simple as just a costume and an oxygen tank in the back. 6. Gravity is not a concern out of the atmosphere. Sure there still is some, but the forward momentum that the Lunar Module gained from using the thrusters once is enough to get you very far. With your logic, the International space station should’ve falen down onto Earth a long time ago. Same with satelites. 7. Just because people known for lying were the people in a higher position doesn’t mean the Moon landing was faked. If let’s say your hypothetical sister was known for lying, and you leave and then return for her to talk about how she got rid of a snake in the house with footage, you can’t say that it didn’t happen because of her track record if all the evidence is stacked against you. 8. Neil Armstrong didn’t show up to anything for his own reasons that we don’t know about, but Buzz Aldrin punching a nimbrod Moon landing denier is justified, since they were doubting him accomplishing one of the greatest feats of mankind. The akwardness of the press conference can, again, be for literally any reason. 9. That “leaked footage” just splices stuff from the actual Moon landing shit with a film called ‘Capricorn One’. 10. First of all, 400 miles is nowhere near close to the Moon, and second, THERE’S NOTHING IN SPACE! Not to mention that going to Mars is an even bigger challenge with the complications that planet brings.
@@MephilesGaming1983I always like to go back to the speech deGrasse Tyson gave where he explained that the technology and effort it would take to fake the moon landing would be so difficult that it would’ve been easier to just build the rocket and actually go to the moon than it would be to fake it.
we're sleeping good tonight, boys 😎
Gay
@bpt9817 Yes, you probably are.
@@bpt9817 yes, you probably are.
yes, yes we are.
and girls🗣️🗣️
Seeing this pop up right when I opened UA-cam made me so happy. Facts/history/cryptids/legends/conspiracy videos of yours are my fav!!!!
Much appreciation.
Thank you so much!
More of these 1 hour conspiracy’s please! Or a video with a horror theme? 🤔💭
Perfect, this is my current subject in school. Now I can learn while listening to ASMR 😂😂😂
I'd love an mk ultra facts vs conspiracy video
Definitely!
LOVE these videos, so glad you're doing an hour long version, last one was so good but too short 😅
Keep em coming brother!! Can not get enough!
Yasss!! I'm so buzzing for this 💜😴
Bro you did a 1 hour conspiracy theory video 🔥 thank you! 🫡
You’re welcome 🫡
Banger alert thanks G
Pretty sure they had to use a live film camera pointed at a TV with the moon feed for AUS.
Yessir good timing
🎵Gooodniiighhttt moon men 🎵☁️🌕
Thanks. Good night.
We can’t go to the moon because the cheese would melt.
Wow facts
That sounds interesting, but what do you mean? I'm not familiar with the reference.
Would the technology back then be even good enough to get man to the moon......
Ask nasa 🤷🏻♂️
I see we got baby yoda (grogu) background 👀 now we sleepin 🗣️
These vids are killer
❤ Groku and his siblings
This is the good stuff.
Cool video 🌝 🚀
I’m late to the party on this occasion 😢
Does reading these wild theories ever hurt your brain? Lol
After the flat earth video I felt considerably less intelligent so sometimes yes lol
8 reasons to doubt the moon landing
1. The lunar module (LM) is not likely to have ever existed. Such a machine that can land on the moon with reverse rocket thrusters, then take off again with enough escape velocity to leave the moon and fly 70 miles to magically dock with another craft - is something from a sci fi movie, not real life. That such technology existed in the 1960s, or even now, is bonkers. Even more absurd is that it worked despite never having been tested. 6 times, without a glitch. Much lesser forms of technology have taken hundreds, if not thousands, of tries to get right. Furthermore, the blueprint for this miracle technology was destroyed and is no longer available.
2. Radiation kills. So says James Van Allen, and every other scientist who has considered the issue of sending men beyond earth’s orbit. Not only would the astronauts face significant radiation in the Van Allen belts, but would be at high risk during the entire trip outside of the belts, including while frolicking around on the moon. Studies suggest that radiation should’ve been much higher than reported among the astronauts, and can’t seem to explain why their alleged radiation intake was so low. The Artemis mission plans on testing radiation levels before embarking on its journey to the moon. Apparently the Apollo missions had no such concerns. NASA openly admits those astronauts had no protection from radiation.
3. Temperatures. You need equipment that can withstand the moon’s extreme temperatures. This includes spacesuits, rovers, batteries, the LM itself, cameras, and much more. A temperature range from -200 to + 200 is a tall task for any equipment, let alone in the 1960s. Allegedly the Apollo 11 mission only saw a temperature range of -63 to +150, but even then there exists an enormous chance of equipment failing in the extreme heat or cold. Heat or cold on the moon can also vary wildly depending on whether you’re in the sun or shade. Being able to auto-adapt in such conditions is a very tall task.
4. Photography. The pictures from the Apollo mission are, quite literally, unbelievable. Neil Armstrong has to be the most gifted photographer of all time. As Dave McGowan points out, to fully appreciate the shots he took, one should put on a pair of thick winter gloves and a motorcycle helmet and walk around the neighborhood snapping pictures at chest level, and see how they turn out. With no way to focus the lens or see what you’re taking a picture of, you’d be SOL when it comes to taking a good shot. But not Neil Armstrong - the guy can do it all. Also, there are no stars in the background when there clearly should’ve been. The moon has no atmosphere, thus the luminosity of stars is many times greater (the astronauts also claimed they don’t remember seeing stars).
5. Athletic ability. Prior to the alleged moon landings, scientists somewhat gleefully speculated what men may be able to do on the moon due to the reduced gravitational pull. Weighing only 1/6 of what they did on earth, there’d be an opportunity for some cool athletic feats. Even with bulky suits, the astronauts should’ve been jumping out of the gym. We’re talking at least 3, 4 feet high. Instead, they did lame bunny hops and never got more than ~18 inches off the ground. Also, what’s with them moving in slow mo? If you speed up the film, it basically just looks like men running around in the desert in space suits.
6. Miles per gallon. Outside of the fabled Apollo missions, the furthest any rocket has gotten from the earth is around 400 miles. One of the simplest reasons is...fuel. Duh. Pretty difficult to travel millions of miles without refilling. Debunkers always brush off this concern by saying you’re basically good once you leave earth’s atmosphere, and only need fuel to redirect your ship. They neglect the fact that the earth’s gravity is still acting on the ship while on its path to the moon, and furthermore fuel is needed for the maneuvers to get onto and off of the moon. At minimum a moon journey would require about 500,000 miles of travel, but in reality it would be much more. Apollo 17 traversed a distance of 1.6 million miles. Call me crazy, but I feel like that’d require a lot more fuel than a rocket can carry.
7. Prominent characters and their motivations. LBJ and Richard Nixon were not known for their honesty. Scandals plagued their administrations, and ultimately forced Nixon out of office. Their handling of the Vietnam war was a disaster; a distraction from their wrongdoing was necessary, and couldn’t have come at a better time. A successful moon landing could restore faith in government & provide a morale boost for the public. Neither president would have been above lying about such a thing to boost their approval. And as I laid out in a previous piece, the head of NASA at the time was an actual Nazi.
8. Awkward astronauts. The men who allegedly performed the incredible feat of moonwalking do not act triumphant. They act like people who just got away with a crime. Neil Armstrong had never given a sit down interview, and Buzz Aldrin punches people in the face when they challenge him on the subject. The press conference after the 3 astronauts returned from Apollo 11 will go down as one of the most bizarre & awkward of all time. They couldn’t answer the most basic of questions about their experience.
9. In 2020, Wikileaks downloaded NASA’s entire database. Included in that massive treasure trove of hard evidence of US Government criminality and corruption was a series of clips of the faked moon landing that NASA has denied for decades. The upshot of this stunning video evidence, that proves once and for all the transparent moon landing hoax, is that it casts a dark shadow on the entire Apollo Space Program-a program that would have cost nearly $300 billion in 2019. Only by watching the entire video-documentary above can anyone comprehend the sheer depth and breadth of this unparalleled hoax and deception. Nasa has faked every event and is a money laundering company with zero consideration for good American Citizens.
If man had the technology to send men to the moon in 1960s, why has no one even gone 400 miles from earth since?
10 reasons why you are wrong.
1. You’re doubting the existence of advanced technology in the 60’s because it’s the 60’s. I don’t think many of us could’ve predicted that we’d get advanced AI art in 2023, yet here we are.
2. The inner Van Allen belt reaches out 12,000 kilometers, and the outer belt about 60,000 kilometers. The Moon is 384,400 kilometers away from Earth. Dunno about you, but that seems to be way out of the Van Allen belt.
3. Again, back to point 1, you are denying that they did something because of the date. Astronauts literally had heaters in the suits to keep them warm, why do you think they would just go to space with nothing but a few bulky sheets of cloth.
4. The amazing photos can be chalked up to extremely good luck, but if you don’t accept that as the answer, everyone’s slow movement let the camera easily focus, with the added bonus of the only thing to focus on being the astronauts. The stars not being visible is quite simple. So you know how if you’re in a dark place, you can see stars in the night, but as soon as the location is lit, you see less stars? Well that’s because the human eye only sees things that are the brightest compared to the environment. That’s why there are no stars visible on the Moon, it’s because the Sun and Earth are the two brightest objects in the sky from your point of view. You see this every day actually. There are no stars visible during the day because of how bright the sun and sky are compared to everything else.
5. You said it yourself. Scientists SPECULATED that you could do crazy stuff on the Moon, but at the time it was just speculation. Imagine yourself as one of the first people to walk on the Moon. You have no idea how this place behaves, you have zero clue about what is gonna happen to you. Not to mention that the suits weighed about 81 kilograms with some important stuff inside. There was a bunch of fancy tech scattered all around the suit itself, like the aformentioned heaters, which if broken would mean the end of your life. It isn’t as simple as just a costume and an oxygen tank in the back.
6. Gravity is not a concern out of the atmosphere. Sure there still is some, but the forward momentum that the Lunar Module gained from using the thrusters once is enough to get you very far. With your logic, the International space station should’ve falen down onto Earth a long time ago. Same with satelites.
7. Just because people known for lying were the people in a higher position doesn’t mean the Moon landing was faked. If let’s say your hypothetical sister was known for lying, and you leave and then return for her to talk about how she got rid of a snake in the house with footage, you can’t say that it didn’t happen because of her track record if all the evidence is stacked against you.
8. Neil Armstrong didn’t show up to anything for his own reasons that we don’t know about, but Buzz Aldrin punching a nimbrod Moon landing denier is justified, since they were doubting him accomplishing one of the greatest feats of mankind. The akwardness of the press conference can, again, be for literally any reason.
9. That “leaked footage” just splices stuff from the actual Moon landing shit with a film called ‘Capricorn One’.
10. First of all, 400 miles is nowhere near close to the Moon, and second, THERE’S NOTHING IN SPACE! Not to mention that going to Mars is an even bigger challenge with the complications that planet brings.
@@MephilesGaming1983I always like to go back to the speech deGrasse Tyson gave where he explained that the technology and effort it would take to fake the moon landing would be so difficult that it would’ve been easier to just build the rocket and actually go to the moon than it would be to fake it.
i swear everytime i see a video of yours i think your 6dogs
🎉❤🎉❤🎉❤
Late upload🙄
Daddy chill
Mate what are you on about 😂
My sincerest apologies leo1aarontiihonen
Can you read about skimwalkers or like scary true stories about them ? Love the video ❤