The technique that I described is for “humanizing” web content. At least for me and many people, I know it drastically reduces the detection score as well from 100% to up to 20% For other formats, more prompting maybe required.
Try this prompt in Claude 3.5 Sonnet 200k. I've translated it to a target language (Russian), changed some moments in accordance to specifics of my tasks, and hoooly shit, it's good! AI generated text is vanished. It should be noted here that we use Copyleaks AI Detector in our work, the results of the check in which are as close as possible to the organization's own internal AI detector. If you are using another one, switching to Claude may not help you, but it is worth a try.
The prompt I have here is crafted for web content. In your case, you can use this as a foundational prompt “"Tone of voice should be relatable, human content that feels like a friendly chat. Keep it clear, specific and engaging using simple language, varied sentences, and personal insights. Use a mix of short and long sentences. Some sentences should be quick-even just a few words." And you can work on top of this specify any tone of voice, and the type of content you are dealing (in this case XYZ essay)
IT DOES NOT WORK. for I think the readability of the original context is more precise than this prompt, and even its more AI-generated context than the original context
It is quite hit or miss depending upon the niche, the engine, and also the tool from which you are detecting the work. But who cares about detection nowadays, unless you want to hide something. No? Am I missing something here?
Hey Hailey, thanks a lot for the compliment. Tools like Undetectable AI can make your content more not detectable by any tools, but not necessarily humanize.
Try this prompt in Claude 3.5 Sonnet 200k. I've translated it to a target language (Russian), changed some moments in accordance to specifics of my tasks, and hoooly shit, it's good! AI generated text is vanished. It should be noted here that we use Copyleaks AI Detector in our work, the results of the check in which are as close as possible to the organization's own internal AI detector. If you are using another one, switching to Claude may not help you, but it is worth a try.
Hey Akshay, your thoughts on Gemini! cuz many people as already getting answers from this AI (effecting the search results), are there any compelling reasons left? so they can click onto below links to reader further?
Try this prompt in Claude 3.5 Sonnet 200k. I've translated it to a target language (Russian), changed some moments in accordance to specifics of my tasks, and hoooly shit, it's good! AI generated text is vanished. It should be noted here that we use Copyleaks AI Detector in our work, the results of the check in which are as close as possible to the organization's own internal AI detector. If you are using another one, switching to Claude may not help you, but it is worth a try.
The technique that I described is for “humanizing” web content.
At least for me and many people, I know it drastically reduces the detection score as well from 100% to up to 20%
For other formats, more prompting maybe required.
I tried it once, but it didn't totally work. Now, I am using Undetectable AI, which is more accurate than other AIs I tried before.
Try this prompt in Claude 3.5 Sonnet 200k. I've translated it to a target language (Russian), changed some moments in accordance to specifics of my tasks, and hoooly shit, it's good! AI generated text is vanished. It should be noted here that we use Copyleaks AI Detector in our work, the results of the check in which are as close as possible to the organization's own internal AI detector. If you are using another one, switching to Claude may not help you, but it is worth a try.
There isn't really one prompt that can work all the time, because as I told you, things are changing and tools are catching up.
Bro this video is generated by Ai
No Sardar! In fact, as of now it's not possible to generate long-form videos using AI.
@@akshayrhallurthe script of your video generated by ai
The prompt made my essay super awkward and impossible to use, although 50% AI detection from 90%.
The prompt I have here is crafted for web content.
In your case, you can use this as a foundational prompt
“"Tone of voice should be relatable, human content that feels like a friendly chat. Keep it clear, specific and engaging using simple language, varied sentences, and personal insights. Use a mix of short and long sentences. Some sentences should be quick-even just a few words."
And you can work on top of this specify any tone of voice, and the type of content you are dealing (in this case XYZ essay)
@@akshayrhallur nice job sr
Please guide me sr
Can I use this prome to humize my tex through chat gpt
IT DOES NOT WORK. for I think the readability of the original context is more precise than this prompt, and even its more AI-generated context than the original context
It is quite hit or miss depending upon the niche, the engine, and also the tool from which you are detecting the work.
But who cares about detection nowadays, unless you want to hide something. No? Am I missing something here?
Nice content! Do you think using humanizing tools like Undetectable AI, etc would help more in humanizing content tho?
Hey Hailey, thanks a lot for the compliment.
Tools like Undetectable AI can make your content more not detectable by any tools, but not necessarily humanize.
totally useless video .. waste of time .. i didnt even receive the prompt after logging in.
Where is your prome Link sr
Using your prome can I humanize my tex through chat gpt can it's possible sr❓
Excellent! Thanks!
Good to see you back!
Good to see you here as well.
It does not work
Obviously
Try this prompt in Claude 3.5 Sonnet 200k. I've translated it to a target language (Russian), changed some moments in accordance to specifics of my tasks, and hoooly shit, it's good! AI generated text is vanished. It should be noted here that we use Copyleaks AI Detector in our work, the results of the check in which are as close as possible to the organization's own internal AI detector. If you are using another one, switching to Claude may not help you, but it is worth a try.
You do it in gpts? or just in general chat?
You can do either way, but if you have ChatGPT Plus, you can create a custom GPT as well to save time.
@@akshayrhallur Bollocks, this video was really pointless. Gibberish
Something tells me he's using Claude 3.5. Cause I managed to make this prompt work in Claude.
Hey Akshay, your thoughts on Gemini! cuz many people as already getting answers from this AI (effecting the search results), are there any compelling reasons left? so they can click onto below links to reader further?
Of course, there are reasons, but authority sites are occupying these spots.
It also doesn't word.
Word
Try this prompt in Claude 3.5 Sonnet 200k. I've translated it to a target language (Russian), changed some moments in accordance to specifics of my tasks, and hoooly shit, it's good! AI generated text is vanished. It should be noted here that we use Copyleaks AI Detector in our work, the results of the check in which are as close as possible to the organization's own internal AI detector. If you are using another one, switching to Claude may not help you, but it is worth a try.
Hi Akshay your content is amazing just work on editing like Iman Gadzhi i have sent u a mail
also i have made a dm @editinguniverse26
Thanks! Will check and revert :-)