I hope I'm wrong. But the amount of aluminum injected is substantially more then what is consumed naturally through a diet. I understand the majority of Health Organization State the opposite but if you read closely there's always an omission. That one Omission States you would have to ingest 500 to 1000 times more than the amount injected for equal levels of aluminum in your blood
@ScientistSwanda The average adult consumes approximately 5 to 7 mg of aluminum through diet daily. Adjusting for what's absorbed into the bloodstream it would take an adult 2 to 2 1/2 years to absorb 4.4 mg of aluminum into the bloodstream which is the amount an infant receives during the first 6 months of life. I'm happy to be wrong but could you please point to where the error occurred?
@ScientistSwanda I went ahead and researched it for you for free. I just want you to know it's okay to be wrong. I'm here for you if you need to talk about it
I wish you would mention the importance of adequate vitamin D for an optimized response. 60ng/mL is apparently the desired blood level, and the overwhelming majority of people worldwide are well below this level for lots of reasons including winter, latitude, and simply spending almost no time outdoors around noon, and clothes, and sunblock.
@@ScientistSwanda why yes that sounds like a great idea if you are well-informed on vitamin D and immunity. Vitamin D is “a substance that enhances the body's immune response to an antigen”, the definition of an adjuvant therapy, and there have been studies.
You are not considering what the goal here is I'm afraid. Why do we vaccinate populations. Most folks would say to confer immunity = true - to a point. Yet the overarching goal is = reduction of incidence - which dictates everything which follows. So people who speak to "boosting immune response" via diet or whatever are failing to recognize the goal of vaccine use is epidemiological reduction of local incidence in populations - aka "morbidity". If via vaccine use to quickly raise "herd immunity" the prevalence of the viral pathogen is reduced then the chances of individuals encountering infected people to become infected themselves - and subsequently infect others - is greatly reduced. This then dictates what follows that infectious presence vis a vis sick people, economic disruption, healthcare burden, and so forth. A virus can not exist let alone mutate absent "a host". The goal therefore = is to deny them hosts. With enough vaccinated the "chain of infection" can break and local incidence can be reduced or even halted. Moral of the story: thus anything people consider as far as supposedly boosting their individual immune system - such as your Vit. D reference - fails in above. Any supposed immune response to an infectious pathogen - while certainly important - does little to halt its spread writ large as you are now infected = and the virus has gotten what it wants. So your Vit.D represents an _"after the fact"_ action in a game where you want = _"preemptive action"_ to slow/stop spread. If you simply wait to be exposed and infected to hope your immune system can handle what follows you are already behind the 8 Ball as it were. You want to quickly boost herd immunity to reduce morbidity - of which individual immunity is a part.
Don’t be so pleased. It’s regurgitated information introduced by big pharma to fool suckers. Ask yourself why would they need to inject toxic metals with these viruses? Especially in childhood disease pediatric shots? Why would they do it? Because injecting the virus does nothing because it is an unnatural infection pathway and the virus cannot replicated when injected so they couldn’t prove efficacy. So they needed the adjuvants to claim antigen presence which is the response to the toxic metals not to the viruses. No one can explain the mechanism by which your body reacts to toxic metals but responds to something else. :)
I hope I'm wrong. But the amount of aluminum injected is substantially more then what is consumed naturally through a diet. I understand the majority of Health Organization State the opposite but if you read closely there's always an omission. That one Omission States you would have to ingest 500 to 1000 times more than the amount injected for equal levels of aluminum in your blood
you are wrong 👍🙂
@ScientistSwanda based on a 0.1% to 0.4% of aluminum absorption rate into the bloodstream through ingestion how am I wrong?
@ScientistSwanda The average adult consumes approximately 5 to 7 mg of aluminum through diet daily. Adjusting for what's absorbed into the bloodstream it would take an adult 2 to 2 1/2 years to absorb 4.4 mg of aluminum into the bloodstream which is the amount an infant receives during the first 6 months of life. I'm happy to be wrong but could you please point to where the error occurred?
i’m not an unpaid research assistant, sweetie ✌️
@ScientistSwanda I went ahead and researched it for you for free. I just want you to know it's okay to be wrong. I'm here for you if you need to talk about it
Do adjuvants work because the body is actually mounting an immune response to the presence of aluminum?
2002-2011 had annual flu vaccine. 2012 had anaphylaxis reaction...how do I find adjuvants for 2012?
I wish you would mention the importance of adequate vitamin D for an optimized response. 60ng/mL is apparently the desired blood level, and the overwhelming majority of people worldwide are well below this level for lots of reasons including winter, latitude, and simply spending almost no time outdoors around noon, and clothes, and sunblock.
your comment has absolutely nothing to do with the topic of adjuvants.
if you’re looking for a video explainer on Vitamin D then say so.
@@ScientistSwanda why yes that sounds like a great idea if you are well-informed on vitamin D and immunity. Vitamin D is “a substance that enhances the body's immune response to an antigen”, the definition of an adjuvant therapy, and there have been studies.
I think your explanations are brilliant and wonderful!
You are not considering what the goal here is I'm afraid. Why do we vaccinate populations. Most folks would say to confer immunity = true - to a point. Yet the overarching goal is = reduction of incidence - which dictates everything which follows.
So people who speak to "boosting immune response" via diet or whatever are failing to recognize the goal of vaccine use is epidemiological reduction of local incidence in populations - aka "morbidity".
If via vaccine use to quickly raise "herd immunity" the prevalence of the viral pathogen is reduced then the chances of individuals encountering infected people to become infected themselves - and subsequently infect others - is greatly reduced. This then dictates what follows that infectious presence vis a vis sick people, economic disruption, healthcare burden, and so forth. A virus can not exist let alone mutate absent "a host". The goal therefore = is to deny them hosts. With enough vaccinated the "chain of infection" can break and local incidence can be reduced or even halted.
Moral of the story: thus anything people consider as far as supposedly boosting their individual immune system - such as your Vit. D reference - fails in above. Any supposed immune response to an infectious pathogen - while certainly important - does little to halt its spread writ large as you are now infected = and the virus has gotten what it wants.
So your Vit.D represents an _"after the fact"_ action in a game where you want = _"preemptive action"_ to slow/stop spread. If you simply wait to be exposed and infected to hope your immune system can handle what follows you are already behind the 8 Ball as it were. You want to quickly boost herd immunity to reduce morbidity - of which individual immunity is a part.
As always, brilliant explanation!
I’m so pleased to know what an adjuvant is- I get it now! Thank you! 🙏🏼 (I hope I pass the quiz later! 😉)
Don’t be so pleased. It’s regurgitated information introduced by big pharma to fool suckers. Ask yourself why would they need to inject toxic metals with these viruses? Especially in childhood disease pediatric shots? Why would they do it? Because injecting the virus does nothing because it is an unnatural infection pathway and the virus cannot replicated when injected so they couldn’t prove efficacy. So they needed the adjuvants to claim antigen presence which is the response to the toxic metals not to the viruses. No one can explain the mechanism by which your body reacts to toxic metals but responds to something else. :)
imagine the virus not stimulating the immune system
Superb discussion!
Thanks my science teacher!!
thank u 💜