Why were the front lines so weird? And why did they collapse when it was a stalemate in troop numbers? There were no troops in the right side to enforce the encirclement so couldn’t the people in the city still get supply?
@@RedToilets same army size doesn’t really mean much, most likely the defenders were probs spread thin to man the walls so they couldn’t hold the breach
@@rajjain2352 bros defintely salty over the israel flag in the pfp. Don't worry bro as a person from a colonial country I can confirm you'll get over losing your colonies soon enough luckily you Arabs got to keep like almost all of your colonies throughout the middle east and Africa.
@@Yes-qj4bi dude shut up your yapping for no reason like what? wierdos on about "perthon from colonail countrhy you get colonies in afraicaaa isrthael phlag" bro what are u on about stop trying to make everything political, the joke wasnt funny yapping about allat
I wonder why they so easily entered the castle, I mean the inside defense of the city. And the fact they captured it with almost equal armies, not having monstrous losses is also interesting.
They resisted for a month and half, untill the Crusaders built two seige towers and one of them was able to make it through and they were able to send some troops to the inside and they opened the doors.. However by contemplating this u start to think, how can these troops get inside in middle of the fight open the doors without the defenders stopping them? Well there's no decisive answer to that but there are some factors that suggest some sort of treason, 1- the defendors beeing shiiet extremists not sunni muslim and the vast majority of the muslim population is sunni so they don't really care about them. 2- the Shiiet troops defending the city disappeared for 3 days during which the Crusaders massacred the occupants of Al Quds. 3- the Shiiet troops managed tonget a safe oasaage to egypt. 4- on multiple occasions during the crusades the shiiet trooos allied themselves with the Christian forces against muslim ones.
@@moeal17856 Also just before an assault the night before the crusaders moved one of the siege towers to a lesser defended part of the wall without their enemies knowing until it was too late. There were also bribed captains who let the crusaders past.
These were seasoned veterans and knights who had already sieged and defended Antioch from a 40,000 man seljuk army. Not only that they had overcome plague, starvation and desertion in the ranks
The thing that I love about medieval combat is how much time is spent just sitting outside until a town starves from supply chain isolation. Very little actual fighting is done
@@jamesd8458it sounds bad but actually nobody dies as much as 2 armies nullifying each other since at some point starving town becomes forced to surrender
What’s funny is the crusaders didn’t have any siege towers, so they took apart some ships that came in and built two towers that allowed them to pour into the city
And it wasn't even the ships they came in (because they mostly came overland through what is now Turkey); they were supply ships that came later. Talk about no forward planning.
Resume: The crusaders were outside Jerusalem so they encircled it. The Muslim defenders had already recruited 1000 soldiers out of the local population and in 12 stressful days, they recruited 600 more of them, but by that time, the crusaders had planned a medieval blitzkrieg offensive by crossing the walls in both the north and the south. After a last day of preparation, the offensive was launched. The Muslim defenders did their best to halt the offensive but just as the crusaders had planned, the supplies were no longer enough for 10000 soldiers so the crusaders managed to cross first in the north and minutes after that in the south (Because the Muslim defenders had abandoned the area to defend the north. A huge mistake that beearlied the already inevitable). During the rest of the day, the crusaders were able to mop up the Muslim resistance in the city.
Not really if you have superior forces and siege on your side.. Just look at modern battle of bakhmut that ended few days back, attacker had inferior numbers VS defender and still won because it had superior forces, artillery and air superiority.
@@kristijanknezevic9407 The asian hordes were attacking the small village town for 11 months. Lmao, if they spend that much time for every town and village they will reach Kyiv around 219 years from now. Not really supperior.
@@sonnyblc7287 so you know nothing about warfare, next time you spit out BS like that try to use some brain cells if you have any. It doesn't matter how big the city is but how large the force is defending it, largest battles in history where fought in fields and not important places like big cities. 120 000 thousand soldiers where involved at one point or the other in defense of Bakhmut, at peak there was 80 thousand AFU forces in Bakhmut and it's surrounding, 200 billions went into training and arming those, they where also provided with Intel and surveillance from west, yet they lost to a private military company the mercenary thugs recruited from prisons 😂
0:35 I think that was when a bunch of the pilgrims thought that if they marched around the walls, they would fall like Jericho. There were some caught by arrows when they got too close. There were also a few who thought they'd be blessed if they just ran up and touched the walls. Which didn't even well for them.
@@adamamar5100 Yes us Spaniards are very determined. Also he can just show major advances and not do much detail. Many other mapping youtubers have mapped the reconquista so it is very possible.
The crusaders build a siege tower Then the defenders prepared to face it And the crusaders just moved it during the night somewhere else without anyone noticing
He literally only showed the biggest losses in the history of the Muslims, such as the fall of Jerusalem and the Battle of Taurus, but so far he did not show the biggest Muslim victories, such as the Battle of Yarmouk, the Battle of Qadisiyah, the Battle of Mantzkart, and the Battle of Wadi Lakah.Or the Ottoman conquests from the Battle of the Maritsa River to the Battle of Mohács
Based crusades who in this very siege slaughtered muslim,orthodox christian civilians without mercy so much that the blood in jerusalem was knee deep?!!! Have some shame child, the crusaders were nothing but barbarians
They originally expected God to cause the walls to fall on their own like Jericho, but the next best thing happened a couple of days later: Genoese ships and sailors arrived and dismantled their galleys for enough wood to make two siege towers
@@sukhoisumig7191 since the islamic occupation of Jerusalem and the middle East from 635 to 1099, Christians were murdered, homes stolen, boys forcefully taken, women taken as sex slaves, restricting religious freedom by implementing unjust rules ex:- pact of umar. Burning the Holy Sepulchre where God shed his blood for mankind. Continued oppression for nearly 500 years until Catholic Europe said "ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. " you get what you deserve Speaking of today, the land belongs to Jews and Christians not arab occupiers. If gaza never attacked Israel, there would be peace, the problem is islam all around we can everywhere creating chaos and playing the victim. God sees these things and finally he shall give vengeance. Jerusalem is made famous and peaceful under Jewish and Christian rule. Everyone has freedom of religion. God gave that land to the Jews not to foreign occupiers from Arabia.
well, i am not an expert but i always thougth that an atacking army needed atleast 3times more manpower than the defending army in a fortified position, i was wrong.
Your mind of the ignorant is full of washing Crusader Progranda The cursaders litteraly strated to kill all people from muslims, jews, and other christians who disagree with them in the Catholic doctrine Whoever dates this is not a Muslim at all.
@@magonbrc4553 Not really, it occured in many medieval sieges in which the defender is stubborn and doesn't collapse soon, and in this case, it's the Crusaders who went on the rampage.
You have to understand the perspective of the Crusaders. They were fighting along war and were starving, nearly defeated, mutinied and other problems. All of this anger was released in this battle.
@@hellion6737 The holy place in Jerusalem, the Al-Aqsa Mosque, is still in the hands of the Muslims, although the Jews carry out some incursions and attacks from time to time.
The english are like: "We have to conquer this city without destroying a single fraction of the wall or breaking a tiny bit of wood, otherwise christianity will cease to exist"
@@tabletgenesis3439 the Red Cross with a white background was first used by crusader armies during this period of time. Later on it would be adopted by the Kingdom of England as its flag
Join the Discord server for early sneak peeks of videos and more: discord.gg/4dNDQMsF5f
Why were the front lines so weird? And why did they collapse when it was a stalemate in troop numbers? There were no troops in the right side to enforce the encirclement so couldn’t the people in the city still get supply?
@@RedToilets same army size doesn’t really mean much, most likely the defenders were probs spread thin to man the walls so they couldn’t hold the breach
Update please mate
That's what I'm a😂😊❤❤😢😢❤@@telthev2267
Thanks for reminding me risk exists
The crusaders during the first crusade:💪
The crusaders the rest of the crusades:😵
Nah they did well in the third
crusaders only massacre inoocents nothing else
Muslim propaganda. There were barely any failed crusades
@@MarsunT they didn't take back jerusalem
@@ChestaFA Though Jeruselam is under the rule of the Israelis.
Son, they've taken Jerusalem
and massacreid muslims and jews are you proud? if yes youre disgusting
*loads shotgun with malicious intent*
@@alicorn3924 *takes shahid belt*
Son: Who's they?
@@bod-7268 the muslims
Dang, Jerusalem used to be so tiny before. Although for what’s it’s worth during it’s timeline it was really big.
The world has exploded in population in the past 200 years.The world population in 1099 AD is ~300 million people
Jerusalem was actually not that big of a city back then
I think it used to be way bigger during the roman siege, also lot's of houses outside the walls probably
@@capablemachine what about chinese warlord and rebellion wars?? Those were always quite deadly
Jerusalem wasn't actually that big for its time although it received a lot of religious pilgrimages
bravo to the cameraman who went back in time and filmed this battle with a drone
Fr
This joke didn't even make a shitty sense
get a life bro@@rajjain2352
@@rajjain2352 bros defintely salty over the israel flag in the pfp. Don't worry bro as a person from a colonial country I can confirm you'll get over losing your colonies soon enough luckily you Arabs got to keep like almost all of your colonies throughout the middle east and Africa.
@@Yes-qj4bi dude shut up your yapping for no reason like what? wierdos on about "perthon from colonail countrhy you get colonies in afraicaaa isrthael phlag" bro what are u on about stop trying to make everything political, the joke wasnt funny yapping about allat
I wonder why they so easily entered the castle, I mean the inside defense of the city. And the fact they captured it with almost equal armies, not having monstrous losses is also interesting.
They resisted for a month and half, untill the Crusaders built two seige towers and one of them was able to make it through and they were able to send some troops to the inside and they opened the doors.. However by contemplating this u start to think, how can these troops get inside in middle of the fight open the doors without the defenders stopping them? Well there's no decisive answer to that but there are some factors that suggest some sort of treason,
1- the defendors beeing shiiet extremists not sunni muslim and the vast majority of the muslim population is sunni so they don't really care about them.
2- the Shiiet troops defending the city disappeared for 3 days during which the Crusaders massacred the occupants of Al Quds.
3- the Shiiet troops managed tonget a safe oasaage to egypt.
4- on multiple occasions during the crusades the shiiet trooos allied themselves with the Christian forces against muslim ones.
@@moeal17856 Well why did these idiots sunnis put Shiite soldiers in their city.
@@moeal17856 Also just before an assault the night before the crusaders moved one of the siege towers to a lesser defended part of the wall without their enemies knowing until it was too late. There were also bribed captains who let the crusaders past.
@@nathancrawshaw2708 ohh so that explains how it was able to make it to the walls... And the bribed captains also explains a lot..
These were seasoned veterans and knights who had already sieged and defended Antioch from a 40,000 man seljuk army. Not only that they had overcome plague, starvation and desertion in the ranks
It's impressive with how little manpower they took the city. Normally the besieger needed to be many times over superior in number.
They had the power of God on their side. Anime wasn't invented yet so they were only at half strength.
@@redtsun67 They had the blessing of the pope. It alone boosted their stats by 20%.
They had the best equipment, because they were from noble families.
They did have decent equipment. But they were all well trained soldiers. The militia at Jerusalem was hardly comparable in skill
@@redtsun67 God didn't exist and doesn't exist now either
GET THIS MAN TO 100k he really deserves it for the hard work he puts in to these battles.
Where do you get the bird flag
He’s above 100k now
The thing that I love about medieval combat is how much time is spent just sitting outside until a town starves from supply chain isolation. Very little actual fighting is done
Eyo, try read 21st years siege of Candia, both forces are starved, and it was a lesson that longest sieges are really bad choices.
Nothing to love about starving a town of people
@@jamesd8458 Dear God stop taking it so literally I'm fascinated by the technique.
@@jamesd8458it sounds bad but actually nobody dies as much as 2 armies nullifying each other since at some point starving town becomes forced to surrender
Summary of troops:
Defenders:7,500(start)
11,000(peak)
Attackers: 13,300
Losses:
Defenders: the whole army
Attackers: 3,300
Thanks bro
Numbers are inaccurate
@@MrBess81 its in the video
@@awesomeaiden53srandomstuff53 welcome
@@zayedbinimran957 numbers in the video are innacurate
Front lines in Medieval Wars are so confusing,
yes, they are very confusing, the plans are weird
opposite
Deus Vult
What’s funny is the crusaders didn’t have any siege towers, so they took apart some ships that came in and built two towers that allowed them to pour into the city
And it wasn't even the ships they came in (because they mostly came overland through what is now Turkey); they were supply ships that came later.
Talk about no forward planning.
Nah they got the diy siege tower
Resume: The crusaders were outside Jerusalem so they encircled it. The Muslim defenders had already recruited 1000 soldiers out of the local population and in 12 stressful days, they recruited 600 more of them, but by that time, the crusaders had planned a medieval blitzkrieg offensive by crossing the walls in both the north and the south. After a last day of preparation, the offensive was launched. The Muslim defenders did their best to halt the offensive but just as the crusaders had planned, the supplies were no longer enough for 10000 soldiers so the crusaders managed to cross first in the north and minutes after that in the south (Because the Muslim defenders had abandoned the area to defend the north. A huge mistake that beearlied the already inevitable). During the rest of the day, the crusaders were able to mop up the Muslim resistance in the city.
Love the unique wall design, that you showed in the video!
@Shark Beast Fuck that has to do with the comments?
Wdym
@SharkBeastcry about it🤭🤭🤭
@@Heikinnen0301why does that translate to smoke lol
@SharkBeast bro got mad that the crusaders won so he came bother everyone in the comments
pathetic
I love it when the divisions just spawn
Recruiting/draft
Im so happy they had a mapping satellite in 1099!
That is impresive, since the siegers need to have 3:1 ratio atleast to concider attack
Their numbers were likely much higher
Not really if you have superior forces and siege on your side..
Just look at modern battle of bakhmut that ended few days back, attacker had inferior numbers VS defender and still won because it had superior forces, artillery and air superiority.
@@kristijanknezevic9407 The asian hordes were attacking the small village town for 11 months. Lmao, if they spend that much time for every town and village they will reach Kyiv around 219 years from now. Not really supperior.
@@sonnyblc7287 so you know nothing about warfare, next time you spit out BS like that try to use some brain cells if you have any. It doesn't matter how big the city is but how large the force is defending it, largest battles in history where fought in fields and not important places like big cities.
120 000 thousand soldiers where involved at one point or the other in defense of Bakhmut, at peak there was 80 thousand AFU forces in Bakhmut and it's surrounding, 200 billions went into training and arming those, they where also provided with Intel and surveillance from west, yet they lost to a private military company the mercenary thugs recruited from prisons 😂
@@sonnyblc7287 russia is not asian.
0:35 I think that was when a bunch of the pilgrims thought that if they marched around the walls, they would fall like Jericho. There were some caught by arrows when they got too close. There were also a few who thought they'd be blessed if they just ran up and touched the walls. Which didn't even well for them.
I have had this song in my mind for ages now lol,such a coincidence you used it in your video
Me and the boys in 2030✝️💪🏻
I think it would be better if you start from your own country first.
@@fratsan9979 gay
@@fratsan9979 cry
So edgy
@@jostnamane3951 kid
It’s cool that your using divisions now keep it up it gives a better scope of the battle
Can you please do the Spanish Reconquista next I love your videos btw and I have been subbed for a year
Bro that war was 7 century
@@adamamar5100 Yes us Spaniards are very determined. Also he can just show major advances and not do much detail. Many other mapping youtubers have mapped the reconquista so it is very possible.
@@adamamar5100 HE JUST UPLOADED RECONQUISTA OMG
@@brftechk I can say muslims literally say we won't surround united our death
@@adamamar5100 wtf did u just say did u just have a seizure lmao
Give this man an Oscar
Edit: I’m telling that to the creator for taking his time to animate this not because they are slaughting Muslims or something
frfrfr
you say that bcs he fullfils youre desire of showing christians massacreing muslims
@@adnan_honest_jihadist5775 That guy says to give the oscar to the creator of the animation NOT for the siege and the massacre that happened
@@Monarchist_greek42891 and im saying the creator of this video doesnt deserve it for doing a video about it
@@adnan_honest_jihadist5775 boy what the hell boy
the risk music gives me traumatizing flashbacks from playing with my friends
cool!
CNN: The situation in Jerusalem remains difficult
Took me a second to figure out why the Roman legions were flying a cross
I forgot how many times Jerusalem has been conquered
I like to see how the last Arab soldiers just dug in at Al-Aqsa and the Church of the Holy Sepulcre.
(Not to mention those who tried to flee)
This is amazing.
Wow they fell back to the temple mound, that’s wild
you should also do a countdown for the slaughter of the vast majoirty who were slaughtered following the battle, be they christian, muslim or jew.
Pov:Just chillin in ur home in jerusalem, hears a strange song: RULE BRITTANIA
Idk much I may be wrong but I don't think the flag is just England is the crusaders who used the flag as well
Dude, they are mostly French, not English... It was the flag of the french crusaders during the first crusades.
How many sieges of jerusalems are in all the crusades?!
Not that many actually
There was this one
The one by Saladin
And the one by the mamelucks
nice
I remember it, like it was yesterday
So well done.
Legit, I saw 1099 and immediately thought this was a tax related video before I read the rest of the title.
Crusades may be a failure ,but it is replaced by european colonists in 1700's .😂
Actually in 1700 Jerusalem was controlled by the Ottoman Empire
(Correct me if i wrong)
did one guy forgot to lock the door?
The crusaders build a siege tower
Then the defenders prepared to face it
And the crusaders just moved it during the night somewhere else without anyone noticing
Nice
Edit: I am saying the video and the animation was nice, not the fucking massacre that happened after the crusaders took jerusalem.
ig you turn a blind eye on youre book too?
@@adnan_honest_jihadist5775 Im saying that the animation was nice
@@Monarchist_greek42891 ye but what about youre bible
@@adnan_honest_jihadist5775 What about it?
@@adnan_honest_jihadist5775 your*
Pls do the "Völkerschlacht bei Leipzig". This was the greatest battle of all times before WWI+II
Who are the defenders?
Fatimids
Proto-terrorists
@@زيدأكدي Thank you ☺️
@@زيدأكدي terrorists
Seljuks controlled the city
I love the music
How the hell did new soldiers get added to the defenders when the city was completely surrounded in 0:49 ?
Maybe citizens got recruited?
gave birth
These are militias maybe
Common sense they got recruited or they volunteer
@@cmr_0333 makes sense
Sir, Jerusalem has fallen, what should we do?
There is nothing we Can do.
There is nothing we Can do
Muslims literally getting ratio in this channel
first research wether shia are muslim or not bcs according to my research they arent or are you lazy and should i explain?
He literally only showed the biggest losses in the history of the Muslims, such as the fall of Jerusalem and the Battle of Taurus, but so far he did not show the biggest Muslim victories, such as the Battle of Yarmouk, the Battle of Qadisiyah, the Battle of Mantzkart, and the Battle of Wadi Lakah.Or the Ottoman conquests from the Battle of the Maritsa River to the Battle of Mohács
@@زيدأكدي He showed just two Muslim defeats and made a video on the Ottoman conquest of Constantinople, so there's no way you can make a case here
@@lahire4943 I did not make it an issue in the first place, and the conquest of Constantinople did not appear in another similar channel
christians getting ratio in constantinople, yarmuk, caliphate's expansions
If the Fatimid Caliphates army count was zero then why do I see flags of Fatimid Caliphate maybe those were the people
0:47 : the jerusalem soldiers on the right: No no not going to get out 😂😂
Back then, they most likely fighted to death, escaping/surrendering meant you were a coward.
hell yeah
We gonna do it again
Based Crusades 👌🏻
Based crusades who in this very siege slaughtered muslim,orthodox christian civilians without mercy so much that the blood in jerusalem was knee deep?!!! Have some shame child, the crusaders were nothing but barbarians
@Shark Beast baldwin joined the chat
@Shark Beast you got pissed
@Shark Beast Baldwin won 3/4 battles against Saladin, and Richard the Lionheart won ALL.
@Shark Beast Spanish Empire enter the chat.
battle of Kiev next? (when Germany invaded Soviet Union)
P.S: Why didn't they just enter through the temple mount? Didn't they have siege towers?
They originally expected God to cause the walls to fall on their own like Jericho, but the next best thing happened a couple of days later: Genoese ships and sailors arrived and dismantled their galleys for enough wood to make two siege towers
@@scottanno8861 Woa... poor men, I can imagine their disappointment when they saw that things didn't work that way. Well at least they took the city
Yes. And then massacred everyone, regardless of religion :)
@@Adonnus100 that's because everyone they were massacring them had previously persecuted Christians
@@Adonnus100 Well yeah, the crusaders were basically terrorists similar to modern day Al-Qaeda
You could add some explanations on whats going on
Then saladin comes 🥶☪️
Only in a 100 years, and gets defeated too.
Baibars was way cooler than Saladin
@@Alainmontpellier1000he won but he died after he won
Song name?
Vive la France !
i really thought the crusedares were England
You forgot the hundred thousand or hundreds of thousands of people massacred
yeah, for some reason jihadist fighter group regardless of religion always manages to kill innocent civilians.
@@georgespaceagency9894 When Muslims retook the city they didn't massacre civilians like the Christians did
Jerusalem has a population 800k
This was in 1099 so the population wouldn’t be that much
Jerusalem was not that big back then
@@wilcowen even if it had only 80k or 100k does it make it not wrong????!!!!!
What’s with the risk music?
Deus VVVULT
Clash of clans?
Bah alors les bouffeurs de semoules 😂😂
😂😂😂
@@first-french-empire je me suis emporté 😅😂
@@zeuspri9764un peu abusé
Look how far you've come my friend, since I told you about path and mask animations! :)
Beautiful
God bless them ✝️
DEUS VULT
Does God bless bloodthirsty murderers?
May they burn in hell, especially the men who ordered it, massacring a whole city, god would have been very ashamed that day.
Make a video about Manchuria in 1945
Good old days. Glad to see Jerusalem is in Jewish and Christian hands
No
Get a life
In 1099 the crusaders massacre Jerusalem citizens including Jewish
Tody christian in Palestine sided with Muslims against Israel
@Ali Kasap he is a occupier who lost.
@@sukhoisumig7191 since the islamic occupation of Jerusalem and the middle East from 635 to 1099, Christians were murdered, homes stolen, boys forcefully taken, women taken as sex slaves, restricting religious freedom by implementing unjust rules ex:- pact of umar. Burning the Holy Sepulchre where God shed his blood for mankind. Continued oppression for nearly 500 years until Catholic Europe said
"ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. "
you get what you deserve
Speaking of today, the land belongs to Jews and Christians not arab occupiers. If gaza never attacked Israel, there would be peace, the problem is islam all around we can everywhere creating chaos and playing the victim. God sees these things and finally he shall give vengeance. Jerusalem is made famous and peaceful under Jewish and Christian rule. Everyone has freedom of religion.
God gave that land to the Jews not to foreign occupiers from Arabia.
how do you make these cool videos with google maps?
DEUS VULT!
Day 1 of asking for the battle of nalapani
Worst week in human history
The best
@@CatholicCrusader__30 no
@@asilkinder3609 yes
@santiagomoraa.3710 How is the muslims the "worst evil"
@@CatholicCrusader__30 no
well, i am not an expert but i always thougth that an atacking army needed atleast 3times more manpower than the defending army in a fortified position, i was wrong.
Que vivan los cruzados ✝️
The music you choose for this video sounds so familliar mabye if i play the game risk more i would know why
And after the bаrbařic crusaders entered, they kilļēd everything that moved, a soldier, an innocent human being, or even an animal
Same logic applied to the islamic cultists
@@hellion6737
It's an established fact
good
@@ttraccount2259
Expected. Good for you that you know your origin
@@الصمتالمطلق "i hate you sand "people
Are these Roman Catholic Templar knights ?
W crusaders for saving israel from muslists
Your mind of the ignorant is full of washing Crusader Progranda
The cursaders litteraly strated to kill all people from muslims, jews, and other christians who disagree with them in the Catholic doctrine
Whoever dates this is not a Muslim at all.
They filled the city with blood for all people
And fatimat challiphate lost it.
Israel does not exist yet😂
I think you need to learn more history as this time no country called israel
so butchering innocent people is considered "saving" to you?
Suggestion: Operation Compass in 1 minute using Google Earth
horrible day for Humanity
beautiful
It looks like English attacking some chikens in Jerusalem.
It was NOT the english, it was mostly the french
Crying Muslim noises😬
those arent real muslims they are from fatimid caliphate shia muslims are not real muslims
Rasist
And then we took jerusalem back 😂, we aren’t the ones crying, you are
@@adamplayz5929 and then you lost it
Who won this war?
Who is the attacker
Crusader forces mostly from France.
@@vasiliantonov7484 oh ok
Crusaders from throughout Christian europe😊
Terror1sts.
Okay okay, now it's my turn.
-Salahaddin Ayyubi
@darkenlightenment9773salahadin > 😂
@@maksisd Saladin was destroyed like a dog in over 10 battles and lost to a 16 year old LMAO 😂😂😂
Okay,okay,it's my turn
-Baldwin Iv
Imagine being destroyed by a 16 year old
@@Averagecapitalist124 I will send you my physician, kiddo. And imagine losing 7 crusade 😎🧏🏼
how do you make these?
Then Muslims come back
Saladin
Hello sir, how is the done? What software did you use?
This was done by battlemen in iron armor. Iron not quite software, it’s pretty much hard, not easily penetrable by arrows.
Barbarians crusaders killed everyone after that.
Not unusual in a medieval siege
@@Alainmontpellier1000 Unusual for the Muslims of this period, even when they took back Jerusalem
@@magonbrc4553 Not really, it occured in many medieval sieges in which the defender is stubborn and doesn't collapse soon, and in this case, it's the Crusaders who went on the rampage.
@@Alainmontpellier1000 I care about the facts, you are a deus vult type of guy.
You have to understand the perspective of the Crusaders. They were fighting along war and were starving, nearly defeated, mutinied and other problems. All of this anger was released in this battle.
Please make a tutorial on how to edit front lines like that please
Many moors crying in the comments
😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂 We took back Jerusalem, but did you take back Constantinople?
I smell copium
@@زيدأكدي Duh, Israel is back with vengeance.
it was the Fatimids, not the Moors...
@@hellion6737 The holy place in Jerusalem, the Al-Aqsa Mosque, is still in the hands of the Muslims, although the Jews carry out some incursions and attacks from time to time.
Number 1 :)]
The english are like: "We have to conquer this city without destroying a single fraction of the wall or breaking a tiny bit of wood, otherwise christianity will cease to exist"
Not the English
Why are the attacker troops with a red cross in a white background then?
@@tabletgenesis3439 the Red Cross with a white background was first used by crusader armies during this period of time. Later on it would be adopted by the Kingdom of England as its flag
Lol you don't know Christianity
@@tabletgenesis3439 because the st George cross was popular in Europe before it was just English. Genoa and Georgia still use St George cross
Can u post a tutorial on encirclements
who you gonna encircle man? the army of karens in america?
bruh...
And England win again.
England win nothing, it's the French.
@@Thunderworks no, it was the sigma skibidi toilets😡😡😡😡
How did the number of troops in an encircled/besieged city increase?
Mobilisation.
Cruiser war?
baldlose fanboys in the comment section be spamming "I AM JERUSALEM" 💀
At 0:45 how do they keep getting more forces even when surrounded?
Recruit people in the city
You use the modern ottoman walls in a video about the crusaders, not so good