The only if that matters when it comes to jurisdiction in 99% of cases is "if the defendant has consented to that jurisdiction" because they have no idea if or when they should, & no one is going to tell them, but also they won't even know when they have consented.
As the state is a legal fiction, a corporation and different from the physical location of a state. So you can be at the physical location of a state and not be in the corporation of the state. There is a legal difference.
As I see it there are two kinds of jurisdictions on the human. Personal and private/civil. Personal are contract-obligated jurisdictions and civil is regulated by general justice principles such as the moral and ethics of the population. Most judges in the west will refute the fact that you have a natural person. This is because most western governments have embraced socialism v.2.0, and socialism IS collective slavery, or the lack of self-ownership. The first thing Lenin did when he came to power was to make public health a government task, wich swiftly made the public health government jurisdiction. What people still don't understand is that Government-given human rights are made to enslave you. -You have the right to school, the state has the duty to give it to you, and the privilege to indoctrinate you. -You have the right to health, the government has the duty to protect your health the privilege to regulate what you do, what you eat and what you drink (and what you smoke).
How is it, that the state (which is an abstract entity) has the ability to blurr the lines between civil and state procedure? Is it not interesting that there are only two pleas? How about innocent? Laws are for the guidance of wise men and the obedience of fools. Edmund Burk. When bad people get together the good must associate...... or else. Would it be reasonable in the name of Justice to ask the court to see the Judges history of legal determinations . Thereby eliminating any questions of bias. Personal jurisdiction in a free, democratic and progressive society cannot be justified in any case, unless harm was done. Primarily in that the sovereignty of the state is derived by the sovereignty of "the people" , whatever that may mean.
I challenge jurisdiction in state courts and win all the time. There is a legal difference between being in the state verses the physical location of the state.. the State is a legal fiction a corporation and it can't be proved that I'm in the state the corporation as it only exist on paper. As long as you haven't harmed anyone then the plantiff doesn't have standing therefore the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction.
Bingo , the first person I heard say something that makes sense with respect to personal jurisdiction! Thank you, is there any way to get in contact with you? My skype Id is dappadap1
It depends on the the jurisdiction. State procecutions have to follow code. Civil prosecution is always subject to contract. What I think you may be referring to is the statue of limitations. Both civil and criminal laws will be different. What is interesting to note is that regarding criminal offenses against minors, there is generally no statute of limitations applied. It would be good to begin advocation for the augmentation regarding the legal age of military combatants. As a human being of the world, you could even consider international jurisdiction.
Unless the other party is motioning for an outcome against your favor under lack of personal jurisdiction, I do not think it will need to be Proven, Judah. Also, please note that the right of proof is in the hands of the claimant/plaintiff/person that bought in the case to court (but nothing has to be proven unless it is objected or disagreed with by the other party). hope that has helped!
I like that, "or a corporation" when you know so very well that names in all caps are corporate names. A corporation can swallow another corporation but can't swallow a man (whether man or woman.) Why not just quo warranto the corporate and state corporate governments and go back to being a Republic instead of a statutory law democracy.
These videos are for people in law school and studying for the bar, not the general public. That is why the language in this video seems foreign to you.
Its called jargon.. aka "terms of art". If you do not know what the words mean, study. You can learn the system just like every other law student in America. If you have the brains, that is.
The only if that matters when it comes to jurisdiction in 99% of cases is "if the defendant has consented to that jurisdiction" because they have no idea if or when they should, & no one is going to tell them, but also they won't even know when they have consented.
As the state is a legal fiction, a corporation and different from the physical location of a state. So you can be at the physical location of a state and not be in the corporation of the state. There is a legal difference.
This channel is amazing!! Love your content THANK YOU
lol at him messing up the abbreviation, But this guy is great. Thanks Kaplan!
I have a huge test on this! This is so helpful :)
How did you do on your test? 😃
This guy is great for the Bar Exam, which is pretty handy, because that is what the video concerns.
Again one can't be inside the state as it only exist on paper.
As I see it there are two kinds of jurisdictions on the human. Personal and private/civil.
Personal are contract-obligated jurisdictions and civil is regulated by general justice principles such as the moral and ethics of the population.
Most judges in the west will refute the fact that you have a natural person. This is because most western governments have embraced socialism v.2.0, and socialism IS collective slavery, or the lack of self-ownership.
The first thing Lenin did when he came to power was to make public health a government task, wich swiftly made the public health government jurisdiction. What people still don't understand is that Government-given human rights are made to enslave you.
-You have the right to school, the state has the duty to give it to you, and the privilege to indoctrinate you.
-You have the right to health, the government has the duty to protect your health the privilege to regulate what you do, what you eat and what you drink (and what you smoke).
How is it, that the state (which is an abstract entity) has the ability to blurr the lines between civil and state procedure? Is it not interesting that there are only two pleas?
How about innocent?
Laws are for the guidance of wise men and the obedience of fools.
Edmund Burk. When bad people get together the good must associate...... or else.
Would it be reasonable in the name of Justice to ask the court to see the Judges history of legal determinations .
Thereby eliminating any questions of bias.
Personal jurisdiction in a free, democratic and progressive society cannot be justified in any case, unless harm was done.
Primarily in that the sovereignty of the state is derived by the sovereignty of "the people" , whatever that may mean.
Mnemonic: personal jurisdiction Rarely Causes Severe Mental Strain
Resident, Consent, Service, Minimum Contacts, Substantial business
What if you don't recognize the legal fiction known as "the State?"
What if you move out and establish residency to a different state before the trial. Can you contest jurisdiction during trial?
No
I challenge jurisdiction in state courts and win all the time. There is a legal difference between being in the state verses the physical location of the state.. the State is a legal fiction a corporation and it can't be proved that I'm in the state the corporation as it only exist on paper. As long as you haven't harmed anyone then the plantiff doesn't have standing therefore the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction.
Great stuff
How do I file motion to dismiss on these basis.email me if you don't mind. sharondaarias80@gmail.com
Bingo , the first person I heard say something that makes sense with respect to personal jurisdiction!
Thank you, is there any way to get in contact with you?
My skype Id is dappadap1
Right on Scott Powell.
Scott Powell Hi Scott Powell , how do I get in contact with you , I would like to challenge jurisdition properly , how is it done?
i'm confused...is the minimum contact applied to just the state or the injured individual resident in that state???
It depends on the the jurisdiction. State procecutions have to follow code.
Civil prosecution is always subject to contract.
What I think you may be referring to is the statue of limitations.
Both civil and criminal laws will be different.
What is interesting to note is that regarding criminal offenses against minors, there is generally no statute of limitations applied.
It would be good to begin advocation for the augmentation regarding the legal age of military combatants. As a human being of the world, you could even consider international jurisdiction.
@@danielbtwd wut???
@@23trillionskidoo 🤪🐈🦴👍
What is minimum contact with a state?
and how does that not cover "doing substantial business with a state"?
TARS, CASE, & JuJu A purposeful / intentional availment which gives rise to the law suit.
What does "inless" mean?
He has an accent. That does not change the fact he has a stellar presentation.
Does minimum contacts have to be proven you have failed to answer that
Unless the other party is motioning for an outcome against your favor under lack of personal jurisdiction, I do not think it will need to be Proven, Judah. Also, please note that the right of proof is in the hands of the claimant/plaintiff/person that bought in the case to court (but nothing has to be proven unless it is objected or disagreed with by the other party). hope that has helped!
My Next Move is Always My Best Move thank you very much I been tryin to get that clear and nobody seems to give a clear answer thank you
Yes.
My question is do they need all 5?
"Resident" is a term of subjugation.
And you deserve to be subjugated.
How about in regards the state wanting to terminate my parental rights?
Dont be a person, person is a slave
A Man or Woman.
Do I have to answer the summons?
You can only SUMMON the dead
I like that, "or a corporation" when you know so very well that names in all caps are corporate names. A corporation can swallow another corporation but can't swallow a man (whether man or woman.) Why not just quo warranto the corporate and state corporate governments and go back to being a Republic instead of a statutory law democracy.
Roger Smith So if an actual corporation has its name written in lower case does this make it a person?
just shows that uses a racketeering practice let's play pretend really really
this guy has problem with swallowing spit
Ignore it. He has a great presentation.
The state is a legal fiction I don't live in a corporation.
as usual a bunch of doublespeak you people should be ashamed of yourself for the way you do the American people
These videos are for people in law school and studying for the bar, not the general public. That is why the language in this video seems foreign to you.
Nick Loehr Why would a free people be required to defend themselves against a court that speaks a different language?
They’re speaking English, it’s not our fault you just don’t know what the terminology means...
Hiemdallr Svenson....Say That Again. 😙
Its called jargon.. aka "terms of art". If you do not know what the words mean, study. You can learn the system just like every other law student in America. If you have the brains, that is.