Supreme Court set to hear arguments in Trump immunity case

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 кві 2024
  • The Supreme Court on Thursday considers former President Donald Trump’s assertion of total immunity from criminal charges over his attempt to overturn the 2020 election results.
    » Subscribe to MSNBC: / msnbc
    Download our new MSNBC app for the latest breaking news and daily headlines at a glance: www.msnbc.com/information/dow...
    Follow MSNBC Show Blogs
    MaddowBlog: www.msnbc.com/maddowblog
    ReidOut Blog: www.msnbc.com/reidoutblog
    MSNBC delivers breaking news, in-depth analysis of politics headlines, as well as commentary and informed perspectives. Find video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, The Beat with Ari Melber, Deadline: White House, The ReidOut, All In, Last Word, 11th Hour, and Alex Wagner who brings her breadth of reporting experience to MSNBC primetime. Watch “Alex Wagner Tonight” Tuesday through Friday at 9pm Eastern.
    Connect with MSNBC Online
    Visit msnbc.com: www.msnbc.com/
    Subscribe to the MSNBC Daily Newsletter: link.msnbc.com/join/5ck/msnbc...
    Find MSNBC on Facebook: / msnbc
    Follow MSNBC on Twitter: / msnbc
    Follow MSNBC on Instagram: / msnbc
    #SupremeCourt #Trump #Immunity

КОМЕНТАРІ • 801

  • @TheGullyfoyle
    @TheGullyfoyle 9 днів тому +189

    If this takes more than five minutes then something is seriously wrong with the Supreme Court.

    • @rayray8687
      @rayray8687 9 днів тому +14

      There are 9 judges, each with deeply profound questions to ask, so I’ll give it 9 minutes and then 8 months to deliberate at which time it will be Christmas break.

    • @cloudie9druoid172
      @cloudie9druoid172 9 днів тому +22

      The fact they took this on didn’t tell you that?

    • @allenpenix2266
      @allenpenix2266 9 днів тому

      We already know there's a lot wrong with the current SCOTUS. Clarence and Samuel are outright political arms of the GOP crime family.

    • @GordonRebel
      @GordonRebel 9 днів тому +6

      @@rayray8687 It is not a question of which way they are going to judge but buying the orange t*** more time.

    • @keltus_warrior6491
      @keltus_warrior6491 9 днів тому

      There IS something wrong with this Court. It is corrupt.

  • @NIGHTSTAR-dr1zq
    @NIGHTSTAR-dr1zq 9 днів тому +55

    “A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.”- Marcus Tullius Cicero

    • @rqh173
      @rqh173 9 днів тому +1

      Oh yeah we can! RISE UP AND SAVE OUR DEMOCRACY

    • @jsim5572
      @jsim5572 9 днів тому

      Who committed treason?

    • @MO-ju1zm
      @MO-ju1zm 9 днів тому

      That is a great quote. Love it.

    • @NexPutax
      @NexPutax 9 днів тому +3

      ​@@jsim5572the Creature from Cack-a-Lago!

    • @jsim5572
      @jsim5572 9 днів тому

      @@NexPutax how, all I hear is him try to make Wakada great again and Obiden unleashing scorpions on him such that he is locked up in some cave and not been able to talk to people of Wakada. Is that true

  • @hilpei3675
    @hilpei3675 9 днів тому +171

    SCOTUS had better do the right thing. I'm not very confident. NO ONE should have absolute immunity -- ESPECIALLY a President!!!

    • @markcosenza3274
      @markcosenza3274 9 днів тому +5

      You sound desperate!😂😂

    • @mikebrigs1218
      @mikebrigs1218 9 днів тому +7

      I smell Panic all over you....................

    •  9 днів тому +6

      The Immunity clause is Not "Absolute", you need to read it and educate yourself.

    • @craigmack6354
      @craigmack6354 9 днів тому +11

      I smell ignorance in some of these replies.

    • @markcosenza3274
      @markcosenza3274 9 днів тому +3

      @@craigmack6354 Share your pronouns.

  • @pho-kingsoup8126
    @pho-kingsoup8126 9 днів тому +76

    Thomas alone delegitimizes the scotus. Him not recusing is proof he isn't there for his intended purpose.

    • @donalobrien9422
      @donalobrien9422 9 днів тому

      @@werunapologeticallyprolife2279 Mr Thomas would be forced to resign in disgrace in most western countries for his massive corruption.

    • @joecancer6013
      @joecancer6013 9 днів тому

      One man crushed your dreams 😅😂

    • @markb3786
      @markb3786 9 днів тому

      @@werunapologeticallyprolife2279 Thomas broke US tax law with unreported income.

    • @jacksondrake-lost
      @jacksondrake-lost 9 днів тому

      @@joecancer6013 Yeah Biden. He crushed you and your dream and guess what you gonna get hurt again. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @Bubblyhiccups
      @Bubblyhiccups 9 днів тому

      Thomas sides with the constitution and the American people. The judges going after Trump side with corruption and the liberal elites. 🖕

  • @tvgerbil1984
    @tvgerbil1984 9 днів тому +52

    Thomas and Alito will drag it out as long as possible. All those luxury trips and benefits for families from wealthy donars came with certain expectations.

    • @Al-oe8ib
      @Al-oe8ib 9 днів тому +1

      All those pics and videos you mean. Look at Diddy, and Epstein, that is how they compromise people now, we all learnt a lot in the last few years

    • @markcosenza3274
      @markcosenza3274 9 днів тому

      Biden took bribes from China, Russia, Ukraine, and Romania. What's your point?

    •  9 днів тому

      Just like the Biden's and their shady "Business" deals. Still dont know what the business is that they made MILLIONS from.

    • @yellowwducky
      @yellowwducky 9 днів тому +1

      the conservative wing has already passed trump a huge win dragging this out for more than 4 months

  • @toddsmith6681
    @toddsmith6681 9 днів тому +54

    This is such BS, how the Supreme Court could even listen to this immunity crap.

    • @speakeasy911
      @speakeasy911 9 днів тому +4

      They are are in his corner.

    • @yellowwducky
      @yellowwducky 9 днів тому +2

      @@speakeasy911 5 of them definitely are

    • @jsim5572
      @jsim5572 9 днів тому +2

      They should have thrown the case. No discussion.

  • @robertburghardt-qv5dn
    @robertburghardt-qv5dn 9 днів тому +76

    The question is why are they even taking this case.. period! Please show the people of U.S. just how corupt this court can be.

    •  9 днів тому

      Democrats have made the system corrupt and weaponized it against the People and their political rivals.

    • @cloudie9druoid172
      @cloudie9druoid172 9 днів тому +9

      It’s evident they’re corrupt, the bigger question is what can be done about it

    • @jayrice8882
      @jayrice8882 9 днів тому +2

      Because it shows the principals of the presidency! 😂

    • @markkozlowski3674
      @markkozlowski3674 9 днів тому

      They are taking it because they took the Fourteenth Amendment disqualification case. They decided that case in Trump's favor, and they will decide against him in this case. They believe they will therefore demonstrate how evenhanded and impartial they are.

    • @joecancer6013
      @joecancer6013 9 днів тому

      You stole an election in 2020. Corruption is everywhere

  • @CrunchyDark
    @CrunchyDark 9 днів тому +130

    Make criminals illegal again

  • @barbbrinkerhoff1097
    @barbbrinkerhoff1097 9 днів тому +76

    Very concerned about this. The Supreme Court could end Democracy

    • @mikebrigs1218
      @mikebrigs1218 9 днів тому +1

      Better move to Canada then.

    • @monicagamm8633
      @monicagamm8633 9 днів тому

      They won’t rule until after the election. Hoping their boy trump cheats his way in again. And THAT is how democracy would end.

    • @sam-zm5zw
      @sam-zm5zw 9 днів тому

      ​@@mikebrigs1218Marge's Gazpacho police are looking for you,Gomer.

    • @lovetheobscurities
      @lovetheobscurities 9 днів тому

      Not a chance. Not with this. No way they hand Biden immunity by agreeing with Trump.

    • @Anden1
      @Anden1 9 днів тому +17

      ​@@mikebrigs1218 And Russia is calling for you.

  • @boorockomamba6876
    @boorockomamba6876 9 днів тому +51

    Soon, we will get to find out if President Blden can just do whatever is necessary, whatever he wants, no matter how outside the law, to secure our democracy and the security of the nation from the threat posed by his predecessor. A SEAL team is waiting.

    • @gloriaandersen6784
      @gloriaandersen6784 9 днів тому +4

      Exactly!

    • @BILLEON2005
      @BILLEON2005 9 днів тому

      @@werunapologeticallyprolife2279
      These people think that they’re ready, but they have no clue !!
      The left is for complete gun control. The right is for the second amendment. Who do you think is gonna win ??
      The ones with the guns …

    • @iana2127
      @iana2127 9 днів тому +4

      ​@@higgsboson1028 you are going to have to use smaller words...

    • @bonzrh68
      @bonzrh68 9 днів тому +2

      I can’t wait,,, so that he can stay in office without having election! Yesssss!

    • @BILLEON2005
      @BILLEON2005 9 днів тому

      @@bonzrh68 have you noticed that the Democrats are doing as we speak what they say Donald Trump is going to do with his presidency!
      I’ve learned that Democrats are secretly guilty of what they are accusing their opposition!!!
      Nothing that comes out of the left is the truth…

  • @kenmurray4005
    @kenmurray4005 9 днів тому +11

    The members of the Supreme Court whom chose to delay this case to benefit Trump should be criminally charged as coconspirators. Justice Cannon down in Florida too.

    • @user-vj9kp8sn4y
      @user-vj9kp8sn4y 9 днів тому +1

      Because they owe him for putting on the court I told they not they are poeple are brought and paid for at the highest price they don't know nothing about law and order in this country because they are for Rich people because they are Rich people they are in the same club I'm 67 years old and I so tried these judges break there own law that country made my opinion

  • @NIGHTSTAR-dr1zq
    @NIGHTSTAR-dr1zq 9 днів тому +68

    THEIR IS NO IMMUNITY FOR TREASON

    • @mikebrigs1218
      @mikebrigs1218 9 днів тому +6

      Still no conviction of Treason, or proof.

    • @Schooner77
      @Schooner77 9 днів тому +9

      He's a criminal lock him up

    • @fra6215
      @fra6215 9 днів тому

      Democrats have developed an involuntary response mechanism, sort of like breathing while sleeping.
      They tend to blurt out some of their 8 or so "key" words when triggered. They just sort of roll the dice in their head and whatever they land get blurted out sub-consciously.

    • @user-pw7bs8zg3w
      @user-pw7bs8zg3w 9 днів тому

      What Trump did and is still doing is treason

    • @dennischroninger1911
      @dennischroninger1911 9 днів тому

      Biden the one should be charged with Treason!

  • @beadsy-dl5up
    @beadsy-dl5up 9 днів тому +13

    In ANY other court the answer would be a no brainer BUT this court i am not to sure

  • @user-dc5hf6em2s
    @user-dc5hf6em2s 9 днів тому +23

    If everyone is equal up under the Law. No one is above the law. Why tf is this even a case? Make it make sense!!!

    • @jsim5572
      @jsim5572 9 днів тому

      But some are already above the law. What are you writing about

    • @user-dc5hf6em2s
      @user-dc5hf6em2s 9 днів тому

      @@jsim5572 You might get around or get by the law. You may skate through on a technicality. You may get by on some ambiguous or vague interpretation of the law. You're never above the law!!!

    • @plentyofpaper
      @plentyofpaper 9 днів тому

      ​@@user-dc5hf6em2s No.
      The justice department policy of not bringing charges against a sitting president is about as clear as "above the law" gets.
      But that's justice department policy. Not part of the constitution, or any law to the best of my knowledge (if I'm mistaken, kindly correct me.)
      I'm still scratching my head as to why the Supreme Court is treating that policy as if it's law.

    • @user-dc5hf6em2s
      @user-dc5hf6em2s 9 днів тому

      @@plentyofpaperWe,ll see

  • @angusg220
    @angusg220 9 днів тому +37

    Nonsensical to believe that any man is above or below the law.

    • @joecancer6013
      @joecancer6013 9 днів тому

      You would think. Then we have OJ. Hillary Clinton

    • @markb3786
      @markb3786 9 днів тому

      @@joecancer6013 desperate

    • @joecancer6013
      @joecancer6013 9 днів тому +1

      @@markb3786 Covfefe is an Acronym

  • @tonipolkki4728
    @tonipolkki4728 9 днів тому +47

    "Seal team 6 stand back and stand by" - Dark Brandon.

    • @markcosenza3274
      @markcosenza3274 9 днів тому +5

      Dark Brandon is driving his big rig cross country, no joke!😂😂 4 more years Pause!😂😂

    • @antonystringfellow5152
      @antonystringfellow5152 9 днів тому +1

      Biden could be set to become America's first King!
      After his passing, Queen Kamala.
      It all depends on this ruling.

    • @RefrigeratorWilliamPerry
      @RefrigeratorWilliamPerry 9 днів тому +3

      @@markcosenza3274😂😂😂😂😂

    • @fra6215
      @fra6215 9 днів тому +4

      Dork Brandon is still looking for his uncle that was eaten by cannibals. He was last seen hanging out with Jackie.

    • @mikebrigs1218
      @mikebrigs1218 9 днів тому +3

      @@markcosenza3274 LOL. I heard that speach. Biden is Toast.

  • @LuciferBlack-zp8lr
    @LuciferBlack-zp8lr 9 днів тому +28

    Anyone else in America would already be incarcerated....
    The world is laughing at America, Australians certainly are...🇦🇺
    😆😆😆

    • @markcosenza3274
      @markcosenza3274 9 днів тому +2

      2 months on UA-cam? Desperation!😂😂

    • @fra6215
      @fra6215 9 днів тому

      Who cares what the KIWI's think....

    • @mikebrigs1218
      @mikebrigs1218 9 днів тому +1

      We are just laughing at you.

    • @felixd.4150
      @felixd.4150 9 днів тому +3

      ​@@fra6215Kiwis? lol

    • @joboygbpedwards
      @joboygbpedwards 9 днів тому

      @@markcosenza3274The trolls and foreigners are pimping for Biden. Don’t buy their BS. Look around, and research what a Democrat America looks like. It looks like SF and NYC and DC. Enough is enough. Vote Trump in November.🇺🇸🇮🇱

  • @10sassafras
    @10sassafras 9 днів тому +8

    Surely illegal acts are, by definition, not official acts of the person holding that particular job? The office doesn't require the office holder to break laws. It's just a job.

    • @SFoureman
      @SFoureman 9 днів тому +2

      You would think. How this is even a question is beyond me.

  • @MrJon92as
    @MrJon92as 9 днів тому +7

    And I think we could find out today if even the liberal justices on SCOTUS aided and abetted Trump in delaying the trial.

  • @patbrennan6572
    @patbrennan6572 9 днів тому +4

    Please stop calling them Justice's , Well, six of them anyway.

  • @firstgopinbredhillbilliesl6100
    @firstgopinbredhillbilliesl6100 9 днів тому +10

    JAIL THE ORANGE MAFIA

  • @scooter2377
    @scooter2377 9 днів тому +28

    Jail for DONNIE

    •  9 днів тому +2

      Hi Fascist!

    • @richardmillward3898
      @richardmillward3898 9 днів тому

      Dictionary? What does that even mean?

    • @Schooner77
      @Schooner77 9 днів тому +3

      Lock him up. He's a career criminal. Let's go jurors ⚖️

    • @fra6215
      @fra6215 9 днів тому +1

      @@Schooner77 I see you made use of your automated response mechanism there!
      This time, you subconsciously blurted out "lock him up".

    • @johnwilson8482
      @johnwilson8482 9 днів тому

      Trump is the fascist. Anyone with a brain knows that.

  • @Muttinchopsforeverandalways
    @Muttinchopsforeverandalways 9 днів тому +14

    The Supreme Court hasn't been Supreme in a long time

    • @archieclement2977
      @archieclement2977 9 днів тому +1

      Yeah, ever since it ceased to give you what you wanted. Until then the Supreme Court was wonderful.

    • @Muttinchopsforeverandalways
      @Muttinchopsforeverandalways 9 днів тому +1

      @@archieclement2977 Lol I don't have a case to present to them

    • @gm7304
      @gm7304 9 днів тому

      Cody Dog🕊

    • @archieclement2977
      @archieclement2977 9 днів тому

      @@Muttinchopsforeverandalways As soon as these institutions set up by men who are far wiser than they are fail to give Democrats exactly what they want these institutions lose all value to them, and Democrats are ready to scrap them. I never cared for "Imagine" by John Lennon, but the lyrics to "Revolution" were spot on. We saw you coming.

  • @barrywhitley7492
    @barrywhitley7492 9 днів тому +4

    Totally out to lunch. Criminals do not have immunity!!!!

  • @susansantapola
    @susansantapola 9 днів тому +6

    There is something very wrong indeed if a president actually NEEDS immunity from commiting crimes. No one ever is above the law.

    • @petersinclair3997
      @petersinclair3997 9 днів тому

      No one should need to be absolutely above the Law.

  • @movieman2960
    @movieman2960 9 днів тому +4

    Why didn't the Supreme Court argue this in December? Because tRump wanted to delay the trial.

  • @davedon260
    @davedon260 9 днів тому +4

    The president should spend more time not breaking the law or not trying to break the law or not looking for loopholes in the law. It’s ridiculous that the supreme courts took this case in the first place.

    • @james-rd4dq
      @james-rd4dq 9 днів тому

      They want to delay for Trump hope he's reelected, THAT'S IT. They will push it back to Chutkan to do more outer Official Duties to delay.

  • @abra_kadabra805
    @abra_kadabra805 9 днів тому +3

    Not sure why SCOTUS is listening to this BS other than helping trump out. SMGDH

  • @NIGHTSTAR-dr1zq
    @NIGHTSTAR-dr1zq 9 днів тому +4

    A central point in the Declaration of Independence is rulers derive their authority from the people and not from God, and governments “derive their just powers from the consent of the governed.” This bold statement was an explicit, and clearly understood, rejection of Divine Right and the right of the King of Great Britain to rule over the colonies. This was also one of the reasons why God is not mentioned in the Constitution and we were never to have a king (and his attendant Divine Right) under the laws of our new government.

  • @mwood341
    @mwood341 9 днів тому +3

    Reminder: This was never even a problem to be considered before Trump came along.

  • @jeannetteburkins6855
    @jeannetteburkins6855 9 днів тому +2

    I can't even beleive this is even a freaking thing. But on the other side, if they do the right thing it's over. Hearing done forever. No going back no redoing.

  • @lindaevancic2651
    @lindaevancic2651 9 днів тому +2

    Do you think we can keep all of these indictments on hold until November?

  • @billysastard8779
    @billysastard8779 9 днів тому +3

    If he is imune than hit squad can lock n load right?

  • @mariag8458
    @mariag8458 9 днів тому +2

    This is ridiculously stupid!!!

  • @mountainlinx
    @mountainlinx 9 днів тому +1

    This is insane! That this is even happening! What a sad joke!

  • @camelshit446
    @camelshit446 9 днів тому +61

    *Give a president absolute immunity, and you won't have a president but a dictator.*

    • @archieclement2977
      @archieclement2977 9 днів тому

      If Presidents don't have immunity they can't do their job.

    • @markcosenza3274
      @markcosenza3274 9 днів тому +4

      Like every other president?😂😂

    • @T.Heckler
      @T.Heckler 9 днів тому +3

      Does Trump think he'll survive 2024 election if there is absolute immunity?

    • @mikebrigs1218
      @mikebrigs1218 9 днів тому +1

      We had this for years.............

    • @joboygbpedwards
      @joboygbpedwards 9 днів тому

      Trump’s term was much much much better than Biden’s. Trump 2024, because we’ve had enough of Dementia Joe.

  • @tismeagen684
    @tismeagen684 9 днів тому +1

    Do we expect the Supreme Court to make the right decision? I'm not holding my breath!

  • @Nikki-yn7yv
    @Nikki-yn7yv 9 днів тому +1

    No One Should Ever Be Above the Law, especially in America the so called’ land of the free’

  • @face5624
    @face5624 9 днів тому +3

    If the SCOTUS finds a president is immune from prosecution i hope Biden takes full advantage of it😂😂

  • @ehquetest
    @ehquetest 9 днів тому +1

    The incorrect assumption is that ALL the “conservative” justices don’t want authoritarian rule.

  • @skyrocketcoast219
    @skyrocketcoast219 9 днів тому +1

    Heard snippets this morning: very difficult to listen to the Trump shyster lawyer : hes crapping on the Constitution
    These justices are completely wiggy & vile at best.

  • @volrath77
    @volrath77 9 днів тому +1

    Let us see whether the judges will render their judgment in accordance with the laws of the land or the expediency of politics.

  • @rohnleidigh213
    @rohnleidigh213 9 днів тому +1

    The fact that this even needs to be debated by the highest court in the land is ridiculous, and an embarrassment. Ffs. It's either 'NO,' no one is above the law... or 'yes,' and set the precedent that one man in one position can violate laws and can even rig elections, remove political rivals, and set themselves up to become a dictator. Where would it end?!! Idiocy.

  • @Lana-oe3qy
    @Lana-oe3qy 9 днів тому +2

    If SCOTUS comes out with total immunity for Trump, we the people can elect congressman in Senate and the House that would be able to expell these same Supreme Court justices. Vote Blue down ballot.

  • @winluben2909
    @winluben2909 9 днів тому +1

    SCOTUS better do the right thing.

  • @user-mp9sk2oi4f
    @user-mp9sk2oi4f 9 днів тому +1

    No criminal is above the law.

  • @frankhoffman3566
    @frankhoffman3566 9 днів тому +1

    I listened to a good bit of it. I thought the best question to counsel came from Justice Jackson to Trump's lawyer. To paraphrase
    'There has been a lot of discussion about the need for some kind of immunity for official presidential acts as opposed to private acts. Wouldn't immunity against prosecution of presidential conduct, even for official acts, potentially turn the most powerful office in the world into' a seat of criminal activity'?
    She discussed how the president consults with the best lawyers on every decision and how EVERYONE ELSE in government is subject to criminal prosecution for their official acts, I thought her comments and questions were solid and to the point.

  • @bjv2323
    @bjv2323 9 днів тому +1

    What a joke this Supreme Court justices are

  • @13Skaree
    @13Skaree 9 днів тому +1

    It's time we the people hold the Supreme Court accountable for their ethics violations and their betrayal to the American people

  • @guyprovost
    @guyprovost 9 днів тому

    As an IT professionnal, I had my share of useless meetings. I can't grasp, how on earth, someone could make happen a meeting where people with the highest payroll to meet and discuss IF a president is above the law and has immunity. To say that that it is stupid, is beyond words. How on earth is the US supreme court could take only a second to deal with this nonsense ?

  • @michaelanderson3096
    @michaelanderson3096 9 днів тому +1

    The judicial branch applies to everyone equally. Civil cases are better than criminal cases.

  • @jacobwilkie241
    @jacobwilkie241 9 днів тому +1

    Let's be crystal clear about this case. This is not to determine if presidents do or do not have immunity. It's enshrined in the Constitution. This case is simply to determine if the cases against Trump were in his capacity as candidate or president. That's it. And based on the evidence, all the cases brought against Trump were about when he was a candidate. None of his crimes fall under presidential duties so there's really no case. It should've been thrown out by now but of course, since it's the highly partisan SC that's not the case.

  • @JackFlaps
    @JackFlaps 9 днів тому +1

    it`s another delay tactic

  • @notyourroad
    @notyourroad 9 днів тому +1

    The duties of the presidency do not include ignoring everybody who tells you that you lost an election.

  • @daveking3494
    @daveking3494 9 днів тому +1

    Donald Trump‘s stacked Supreme Court? Great! They should recuse themselves immediately!

  • @speakeasy911
    @speakeasy911 9 днів тому

    Why is Thomas being allowed to sit-in on this case boggles the mind.

  • @NorbertoManuel-wo5vt
    @NorbertoManuel-wo5vt 9 днів тому +2

    There is no outside immunity its à crazy thought.

  • @dannyspitzer1267
    @dannyspitzer1267 9 днів тому

    Let's see what disgusting move SCOTUS pulls this time...

  • @barbschaefer2902
    @barbschaefer2902 9 днів тому +1

    No one is above the law .you break it and get caught no matter who you are You hope when you elect someoon to lead the country you hope they live according to the laws of the country They do take a oath If broken they era relpronsable for thier action just like the rest of us

  • @1967bvaldes
    @1967bvaldes 9 днів тому

    SAME

  • @movieman2960
    @movieman2960 9 днів тому +1

    The Supreme Court should have rejected tRump's request to consider this.

  • @anniegoulaheee8025
    @anniegoulaheee8025 9 днів тому +1

    If Don gets his way, Has anybody asked Joe what he is going to do with his immunity? He's got a few months to get seal team 6 together.

  • @craigjgomez
    @craigjgomez 9 днів тому

    "Justice delayed is justice denied".

  • @scooter2377
    @scooter2377 9 днів тому +17

    JAIL for TRUMP

  • @user-ij6vg8xq2r
    @user-ij6vg8xq2r 9 днів тому

    Are they SURE they don't need a couple more months to get ready?

  • @jc10747
    @jc10747 9 днів тому

    Conflating civil and criminal law in the main question read by the hosts. Not debunked by guests.

  • @RA31A
    @RA31A 9 днів тому +1

    The bottom line... Ai ai smai sesler, ein els so uil piso- Ai.
    Sinain anchewsol, Ol Rait!

  • @bobolink39
    @bobolink39 9 днів тому +1

    I listened to some of the proceedings today and it sure appears to me that the conservative justices aka rightwing trump supporters are going to grant him full immunity. Sickening and frightening.

  • @Alperic27
    @Alperic27 9 днів тому

    alito is trying real hard to save trump’s skin in the hearing… … …. recognizing that it is more important to let a former fill his time the way he wants (campaign) than to seek an answer to his pasr conduct’s legality…. .. jeez … he does not hide his toughts

  • @mackjrbell7828
    @mackjrbell7828 9 днів тому +2

    Show MAGA the door in 2024.
    Keep democracy alive in 2025. 🌊🌊💙💙🇺🇸🇺🇸

  • @allyfire7915
    @allyfire7915 9 днів тому

    Is anyone else feeling that the SC is becoming like scabs

  • @sherrodharris6598
    @sherrodharris6598 9 днів тому

    They see he can lose in Ga, so the ones he put as a judge, he will be calling in a favor

    • @rwi-uncommonlysensical
      @rwi-uncommonlysensical 9 днів тому

      The GA case is very close to being thrown out..in it's entirety including *ALL INVOLVED*. When this happens..The GA BOARD OF PROVESSIONAL REVEIW , will be starting a *FULL INVESTIGATION*
      Hadn't msLSD mentioned..🍿🇺🇸

  • @hurzak
    @hurzak 9 днів тому +2

    Only a criminal would ask for immunity, so will the Maga Supreme Court give the criminal immunity?

  • @williams8953
    @williams8953 9 днів тому

    What a hard decision 😢😢

  • @deniseb4426
    @deniseb4426 9 днів тому +1

    I am sorry, Americans, but your legal system sucks.

  • @Just12307
    @Just12307 9 днів тому

    How many times did he ask and receive legal advice from his Attorney General?? That testimony needs to heard!!

    • @Just12307
      @Just12307 9 днів тому

      What was the advice that William Barr gave to President Trump? Did he take any notes or recordings? Were there witnesses during their discussions/meetings??

  • @hazepennington9303
    @hazepennington9303 9 днів тому

    The supreme Court better to do the right thing, no one is above the law in our country,, Especially leadership that represent the American people,, and the United States,,🇺🇸

  • @SFoureman
    @SFoureman 9 днів тому +1

    Immunity for crimes committed shouldn't be given to anyone.
    No one is above the law.

  • @SteveRivas-ft8qn
    @SteveRivas-ft8qn 9 днів тому

    Thomas and Alito will be the only ones that will say he is

  • @christianmichael3904
    @christianmichael3904 9 днів тому

    Cases are beginning to over lap a little... bummer captain clementine isnt forced to attend all cases without consequence.

  • @brolicrequis2542
    @brolicrequis2542 9 днів тому +1

    Your organization, and the whole political system is one big circus of fools

  • @robd5254
    @robd5254 9 днів тому

    No not Supreme Court, purched court!

  • @teilchenart
    @teilchenart 9 днів тому +2

    Only dictatorial/communist/socialist states have total immunity for the presidency. Lock him up!!!

  • @tejanoj3017
    @tejanoj3017 9 днів тому

    SCOTFS - Supreme Court of the federalist society. Follow the money.

  • @steve8510
    @steve8510 9 днів тому

    Does America know it doesn't have a royal system?

  • @thegentleman1541
    @thegentleman1541 9 днів тому

    We already know what's going to happen. Why even bother....

  • @TarlachOakleaf
    @TarlachOakleaf 9 днів тому +1

    The way Trump is allowed to play the system is truly sickening. This nonsense shouldn't even be considered by SCOTUS. Instead we're actually wondering what that bunch of clowns will decide.

  • @NIGHTSTAR-dr1zq
    @NIGHTSTAR-dr1zq 9 днів тому +3

    President Gerald Ford also famously pardoned former President Richard Nixon for Nixon’s involvement in the Watergate scandal. Neither Ford’s decision to issue such a pardon, nor Nixon’s decision to accept it, would make any sense if Nixon were immune from prosecution.

  • @diabetesexerciseathomengah2618
    @diabetesexerciseathomengah2618 9 днів тому +4

    Presidential immunity only apply to matters of the state and not his own self interests. Especially one with an intent to commit crimes. Trump should not be shielded by immunity from prosecution. As simple as that. Don't complicate matters. Get him good.

  • @nellyiii8427
    @nellyiii8427 9 днів тому

    It’s like we the people have to wait all day outside the principal’s office, wondering how bad our punishment will be.

  • @sandman7199
    @sandman7199 9 днів тому

    Great photos of the Dump in court. By the look of him, he’s really enjoying the experience, but this is what he wanted. Enjoy Donnie!

  • @michaelharding675
    @michaelharding675 9 днів тому

    Self interest would preclude privilege from voting against privilege

  • @jop7672
    @jop7672 9 днів тому

    The executive branch is only one of three branches of our govt- this immunity madness is exactly why the Fathers made the branches equitable

  • @maxnicks4661
    @maxnicks4661 7 днів тому

    The obvious issue is not whether one party can acuse another and place opposing candidates in jail...! The issue before the court ahould be solely on laws being broken. Did someone do nothing for over three hours while the capitol was being attacted resulting in death and distruction? Did that someone suggest that metal detecters be removed because they were not threating himself? The SCOTUS should rightfully decide in a case by case situation, not whether one party is attacing another party - but whether a person or parties has conspired, directed and was complicent in a violent action. In the future SCOTUS may again decide on an issue. This is a slam dunk conspiracy to subvert, as 62 lawsuits agreed, was a fair election. This obviousness of the former president accusing the rigging of elections goes back to 2012. This recent history lesson has eluded the Supreme Court...

  • @nickmartin8495
    @nickmartin8495 9 днів тому

    they will decide if the earliest settlers and nations founders were right or wrong regarding their disdain for kings

  • @alexperkins8433
    @alexperkins8433 9 днів тому

    RIDICULOUS --- SHAME on them for even taking up this case/running out the clock. SHAMEFUL. INVEstigate Thomas Kavabeer et al. DISGUSTING and shameful.

  • @413smr
    @413smr 9 днів тому

    I feel sick.

  • @genedejong5513
    @genedejong5513 9 днів тому

    Write your Senator and ask for action on increasing the Supreme Court to redress the imbalance imposed by Mitch McConnell.

  • @user-fl8be4px8x
    @user-fl8be4px8x 9 днів тому +1

    I want a president who doesn’t have to paint his face

  • @QLHOOQ
    @QLHOOQ 9 днів тому

    If the Supreme Court sides with Trump on the subject of immunity then they have to also rule on who's responsible for the damage done to the victim(s) of his crimes..Who does the victim(s) hold responsible, the President , the Government or the Supreme Court?