The Environmental Effects of Climate Change On Our Planet | Breakthrough

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 лип 2024
  • Climate change is one of the most pressing issues facing our planet today, with impacts felt across every continent. Scientists are racing against time to find solutions that can mitigate these effects and protect our future. What are the latest discoveries in the fight against climate change? How are innovative technologies and global efforts coming together to tackle this crisis? Find out in this compelling exploration of the planet's most urgent challenge.
    Watch the full documentary: curiositystream.com/video/3015
    Breakthrough, Climate Crisis
    The real impact of global warming is now being felt in communities around the world. Climate scientists explain what to expect where you live, and what steps might still be taken to reverse the climate crisis.
    #CuriosityStream #ClimateChange #GlobalWarming
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 185

  • @MyLoganTreks
    @MyLoganTreks 14 днів тому +32

    VOTE for Politicians who aren't corruptable by big oil. Facts are for every degree warmer, the atmosphere holds 7% more moisture, and the more common atmospheric rivers we are experiencing.

    • @zoeathomson4305
      @zoeathomson4305 14 днів тому +2

      It'll get a bit wetter as it goes through it's cycle and it's warmer than the ice age cycle!!!! Nobody can stop earth's cycles !!!! You have to educate ourselves into believing the real facts about our planet.
      How many times does it snow ball
      How many more times will it snow ball. What world history do we know about the HOT AGE!?
      WE Don't LIVE LONG ENOUGH TO KNOW.

    • @justinjefferson5831
      @justinjefferson5831 14 днів тому

      Hahahahahahahaha brainwashed.

    • @Supportingtruth8258
      @Supportingtruth8258 13 днів тому +4

      ​@@justinjefferson5831yep, that's exactly what you are!!

    • @justinjefferson5831
      @justinjefferson5831 13 днів тому

      @@Supportingtruth8258
      Hahahaha. As proved by merely pointing out that the whole thing is nothing but corruption and propaganda?
      You admit you are brainwashed because you confuse science with television, government propaganda, and corporate grifting - can't tell the difference - and you DON'T CARE that 100% of their doomsday predictions have proved FLATLY INCORRECT.
      You're saying you don't care about the truth.
      That's what you're saying.
      Only fools believe the globe is about to become uninhabitable because of alleged manmade catastropic global warming. Only gullible simpletons, or people with an anxiety disorder, or power freaks, buy into the whole pile of obvious hype and propaganda.
      The proof is that you can't even state your case without wallowing in contradicdtion and absurdity HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA!

    • @minealsomine9663
      @minealsomine9663 13 днів тому

      Or stop believing the bullshit lies. I cannot understand how people can be so damned gullible especially in a time where information is readily available. Just a note Einstein, the earth's climate has always changed and we humans have minimal impact on anything.

  • @bill8985
    @bill8985 13 днів тому +10

    Don't forget to mention Eunice Foote - who discovered CO2 atmospheric warming earlier that Tyndall by three years. But she was a girl and back then, boys ruled.

    • @imtheeastgermanguy5431
      @imtheeastgermanguy5431 12 днів тому

      It's around 200 years ago. And now we are here 😢

    • @robertmarmaduke186
      @robertmarmaduke186 6 днів тому

      Aarhenius was first but he concluded CO2 And water vapor tend to MODERATE temperatures, so Greta quickly discarded his pioneering work.

    • @bill8985
      @bill8985 6 днів тому

      ​@@robertmarmaduke186 first how? Eunice Foote's discoveries (in her 1850's experiments!), "revealed that certain gases, including carbon dioxide (CO2), warm when exposed to sunlight. She hypothesized that higher CO2 levels in the past would have significantly affected Earth’s temperature, foreshadowing our understanding of the greenhouse effect." Arrhenius didn't make note of this phenomena until 1896. So not sure of your claim that Arrhenius was first.
      In fact, Foote, without specific evidence and purely by intellectual conjecture, was absolutely correct! As during a much earlier geologic period (the Eocene), CO2 levels were higher and the climate temperature back then was also substantially higher (not like 1.5 degrees C that we talk about today - but more like 5 degrees C!)
      So, the issue with the planet is not its absolute temperature, but the rate of change of temperature. Most every creature I can think of has lived for 10s of millions of years in our moderate climate. They have become acclimated. But if, in the blink of an eye (on an evolutionary or geologic timescale,) has to adapt to a 3 or 4 degree C change within a few centuries... that's the end of that group of animals and plants. Humans included. Got it?
      And yes, Arrhenius did note that, "in an atmosphere with no carbon dioxide, Earth’s surface temperature would plummet by about 21 degrees Celsius." But we live in an atmosphere that is now around 425 ppm of CO2, substantially higher than when either Foote and Arrhenius were alive. Thus, global sea and surface air temperatures are substantially higher than their 1800s due to the impact of substantially higher CO2 and methane atmospheric concentrations... DUE TO HUMAN CONTRIBUTIONS OF THOSE GASES. It is a simple fact.
      As for water, you should do a little reading into the impact of water vapor in the atmosphere.... and how the small incremental impact of CO2 and methane tend to occlude an important portion of what is called the “water-vapor window.”
      I know you want to parrot the newsfeed of your favorite propaganda channel. You want to deny the reality of where the world is headed. You want to be able to tell your children - “everything is OK, just keep your head down and get a job in finance - because then you can afford a nice lifestyle.”
      But I tell you, there isn’t any amount of praying to a god or a god’s son that will alter our path to 4 or 5 degrees C increase in global temperatures. No technology will save us. So, enjoy your time here. Good luck to you and your kids.

    • @imtheeastgermanguy5431
      @imtheeastgermanguy5431 6 днів тому +1

      @@robertmarmaduke186 what has Greta to do with this topic?

    • @robertmarmaduke186
      @robertmarmaduke186 6 днів тому

      @@imtheeastgermanguy5431 Greta's the _paid child actress_ Gore hired to 'bring home' his Carbon Cap & Trade Scheme (actual legal name) green-wáshing extörtion rácket, that's causing $Trillions in structural mal-investment with CRUSHING cost impacts on the Workers. Greta is your Vírgín Máry, your Joán de'Arç!

  • @loopylynda1974
    @loopylynda1974 13 днів тому +13

    OUR CHILDREN WILL PAY THE PRICE FOR OUR UNWILLINGNESS TO MAKE SACRIFICES TODAY AND OUR INSATIABLE GREED...

    • @jeaninehicks2907
      @jeaninehicks2907 12 днів тому +1

      WE, along with our kids and grandkids 😢

    • @imtheeastgermanguy5431
      @imtheeastgermanguy5431 12 днів тому

      The problem is not the unwilling but rather those who even understand /ignore the facts

    • @orca1717
      @orca1717 12 днів тому

      Even if we know this, we all need to make action plans. And, with too much conspiracy theories going on (which might hold truth to some degrees), we do need to plan step by step shifts into more energy sufficient, environmentally friendly way of living. Just fighting with those who hold authorities is like babies with tantrum. We need more data, planning, and brilliant problem solving skills!!!! No more just yelling for change. We need change IN OURSELVES & IN OUR MINDS!!! All of us need to use each individual skills to come to advance in this new era 🌏🌎🌍

    • @imtheeastgermanguy5431
      @imtheeastgermanguy5431 12 днів тому

      @@orca1717 we have already enough data for this but we don't do it

    • @orca1717
      @orca1717 12 днів тому

      @@imtheeastgermanguy5431 Well, but the data is conflicting, and also manipulated (funded largely) by companies with power, and no one can deny that facts. Also, each one of us can’t just do things the better way when the better way is more costly (in the time of inflation, we are naturally less inclined to do that.)
      It’s a systematic problem that every each of us needs to chip in for the better ideas. You can’t just blame the big corporations or government. “WE” are you and me, and everyone on earth.

  • @CrystalAbrahams
    @CrystalAbrahams 14 днів тому +6

    Excellent graphics and well written content.
    Crystal in Canada 🇨🇦

  • @harveytheparaglidingchaser7039
    @harveytheparaglidingchaser7039 14 днів тому +6

    Unhappy anniversary
    "During heat waves, Lytton is often the hottest spot in Canada despite its location north of 50°N in latitude. In three consecutive days of June 2021, it broke the all-time record for Canada's highest temperature, ending at 49.6 °C (121.3 °F) on June 29. This is the highest temperature ever recorded north of 45°N and higher than the all-time records for Europe and South America. The next day (June 30), a wildfire swept through the valley, destroying the majority of the town."

    • @levmoses742
      @levmoses742 13 днів тому

      Curious what your June has been like this year, and I’m aware there isn’t necessarily consistency.
      Thanks for your share!

    • @imtheeastgermanguy5431
      @imtheeastgermanguy5431 12 днів тому

      "nah it's only geo engineering, cloud seeding and haarp..!"

    • @sydfrissell
      @sydfrissell 6 днів тому

      @@imtheeastgermanguy5431 Climate change is IRREVERSABLE! Get it? The temps will NEVER GO DOWN - unless the CO2 already emitted is TAKEN OUT OF THE AIR! Our future generations can expect a "hothouse Earth", like during the dinosaur age - and this age will last for a long, long, long time.

    • @imtheeastgermanguy5431
      @imtheeastgermanguy5431 6 днів тому

      @@sydfrissell I get it but I'm not sure if we can reverse it. It's a huge effort but it's possible. I guess if the climate change is going faster than there are no more future generations

    • @robertmarmaduke186
      @robertmarmaduke186 6 днів тому

      In other words an extreme WEATHER event. It soared above 98°F in Fairbanks every summer under the Midnight sun...but NOT the last two years of Summer With No Summer. *Magic CO2!*

  • @mayatara1980
    @mayatara1980 13 днів тому +8

    The local climate predictions might change entirely if the AMOC stops. Then the northern hemisphere will more likely plunge into an ice age. Both warm or cold scenarios are terrifying and both can happen sequentially. Every life form will be slowly adapting to the warming and then will be hit by freezing cold. It's a possibility looking more likely by the day. We don't know for sure what will hapoen, but dramatic changes will happen one way or another and no one is able to adapt to such rapid dramatic changes, especially not the plants and animals and ecosystems we depend on for surviving.

    • @oceancowboy
      @oceancowboy 12 днів тому

      When, not if.

    • @imtheeastgermanguy5431
      @imtheeastgermanguy5431 12 днів тому

      I heard if the amoc is going down Europe will be colder but probably not a ice age, maybe I winter it's harder or longer but in summer there are heavy storms and rain are going on. The German scientist "harald lesch" said it like this "imagine in winter when it's cold outside and warm inside, look at the windows how much moisture is there. That will happen to us when Europe is cooling down and the rest of the earth is heating up, those rainfalls we won't experience!" I guess that he is right

    • @robertmarmaduke186
      @robertmarmaduke186 6 днів тому

      Every species alive today survived dice Ages and tropical waves of 4,000ppm CO2. Why be such a drama queen?

    • @karlwheatley1244
      @karlwheatley1244 21 годину тому

      @@robertmarmaduke186 "Every species alive today survived dice Ages and tropical waves of 4,000ppm CO2. Why be such a drama queen?" Regarding the first point, that's misleading and irrelevant. Humans are currently warming the planet ~20 times faster than it usually warms when coming out of an ice age. It is that SPEED of temperature change that makes it so lethal--species don't have the time to adapt or migrate. For example, oak trees are not able to walk 1/4 mile a year, but if temperature change is happening 20-50 times more slowly, where their acorns can make it 50-75 feet from the trunk of the tree.
      Regarding the second point, NO, they didn't. Global CO2 levels are now the highest they have been in 14 million years; neither humans nor many other species on Earth have ever seen CO2 levels this high. Furthermore, if you are going to look at CO2 charts vs. time, you would be well advised to look at extinction charts vs. time too, because large changes in CO2 levels have been THE main "kill mechanism" for the many extinction events in Earth's history. I always laugh when climate skeptics make a big deal of the "explosion of life" that happened during the Cambrian period "with very high CO2" levels. Those folks don't seem to know that a) the explosion of life was all in the oceans; there was no life on land, b) the largest living things were ~16 inches long, c) the explosion of life appears to have happened because of rising oxygen levels, and d) CO2 levels were lower for most of the Cambrian Period but when they got very high at the end of the Cambrian Period, that triggered a major extinction event.
      The science is very clear that humans are pushing the whole web of life toward catastrophic collapse in 4 different ways simultaneously, so pointing out the risks from AGW isn't being a drama queen, it's actually being understated regarding the threats we face.
      Take care.

    • @robertmarmaduke186
      @robertmarmaduke186 21 годину тому

      @@karlwheatley1244 Submarines have CO2 levels that won't be reached until year 3000. So they are NOT lethal to species. At previous "+1.2°C Since Industrialization" or +0.006°C per year even CLAIMED BUT VERIFIED "+1.8°C by 2100" or measly +0.04°C per year NONE of the extreme weather events *NONE* can be blamed on increasing CO2. *That is ANTI-Science fraud.*
      The "official" 443ppm CO2 or whatever is bollux, there are readings from other sampling locations as low as 235ppm, that have been taken down so as not to change the narrative. Their 'Hottest Day on Record!' said in the report you didn't read (...climate model simulation...). The track record for all 37 climate models is ABYSSMAL forecasting or hindcasting. *GIGO*

  • @Me97202
    @Me97202 11 днів тому +2

    We were warned. We did nothing. We deserve this.

  • @OldScientist
    @OldScientist 6 днів тому +1

    Sea level appears to be rising at a small 3mm per year. Atolls in the Pacific nations of the Marshall Islands and Kiribati, as well as the Maldives archipelago in the Indian Ocean, have risen up to 8 percent in size (Ford and Kench, 2020). 89% of the globe’s islands and 100% of large islands have stable or growing coasts (Duvat, 2019). No island larger than 10ha decreased in size.
    As regards NOAA tide gauge data, let's look at some examples from around the world. N.B. All sites show a linear Relative Sea Level Trend: Kanmen, China 2.40mm/yr; Sydney, Australia 0.75mm/yr; Ferandina Beach, Florida 2.20mm/yr; Los Angeles, California 1.04mm/yr; Mera, Japan 3.8mm; Cascais, Portugal 1.32mm/yr; Newlyn, UK 1.94mm/yr.
    Jevrejeva, et al (2014) estimated 2 mm/year (± 0.3), and Church and White (2006) estimated 1.7mm/year (± 0.3). So that's a total rise of between 126 and 151mm (less than 6 inches) from 2024 to the end of the century.
    Or try PSMSL data: Kwajalein (Marshall Islands) 1.95mm/yr; Maldives (Indian Ocean) 3.21mm/yr; Lautoka (Fiji Islands, Pacific Ocean) 3.50mm/yr; Port Elisabeth (South Africa) 2.34mm/yr.
    Remember, all linear over many decades, or more than a century.
    Anyway, if you prefer satellite data NOAA's trend was +3.0mm/year Global Mean Sea Level (1993-2022), again linear last time I looked for each set of satellite data (but hey, it may have accelerated in the last month).
    NASA satellite data (1993-present) for Global Mean Sea Level shows a rise of 3.3mm per year. That's the same as two stacked penny coins.
    There is no relationship to the exponential increase in CO2 in the atmosphere. It's going to be decades before even your big toe is submerged.

    • @robertmarmaduke186
      @robertmarmaduke186 6 днів тому

      Increase in CO2 is not really 'exponential' and certainly not in any case from the Western nations. IEA published fossil fuel data show the meager 3% contribution from humans is mostly India/China, the rest is terrestrial or insects or rotting soil and would still continue to increase CO2 levels at 97% as fast if humans ceased to exist.
      _"The sweater chewing Luddite and the cud-chewing cow, are remarkably alike, yet different somehow. Ahh yes, I remember it now, the intelligent look on the face of the cow!"_ Peter Torbay

  • @OldScientist
    @OldScientist 6 днів тому +1

    Between 1961 and 2021 global cereal production increased 250% and cereal yield increased over 200%. Land used for cereal hardly increased (Data from World Bank, FAO/UN). This is the only time in human history that you are more likely to be overfed rather than underfed. We should be thankful we were borne into an age of such abundance. A US DoE study (Taylor & Schlenker, 2021) estimated that a 1 ppm increase in CO2 led to an increase of 0.4%, 0.6% and 1% in yield for corn, soybeans and wheat, respectively, and that CO2 increase was the main driver of the 500% yield growth in corn since 1940. Global tomato production has set a record each year for the past 10 years. Banana production has doubled in 20 years. All 10 of the largest sugar crops in global history occurred during the past 10 years. All 10 of the 10 largest rice crop years occurred during the past 10 years (UNFAO). 2023 was another record cereal crop.

    • @parrisgjerde9212
      @parrisgjerde9212 5 днів тому

      500% yield in corn yield due to increase in CO2 is patently untrue! In fact, it’s been demonstrated that corn is adapted to the CO2 levels of the pre-industrial environment and cannot take advantage of extra CO2.

    • @OldScientist
      @OldScientist 5 днів тому

      @parrisgjerde9212
      Why don't you follow the sources I have referenced, and/or provide some references to support your position?

    • @OldScientist
      @OldScientist 5 днів тому

      @parrisgjerde9212 Try these for size:
      The Earth has greened by 15% or more in a human lifetime. "The greening of the planet over the last two decades represents an increase in leaf area on plants and trees equivalent to the area covered by all the Amazon rainforests. There are now more than two million square miles of extra green leaf area per year"(NASA, 2019). Observations of Earth’s vegetative cover since the year 2000 by NASA’s Terra satellite show a 10% increase in vegetation in the first 20 years of the century. Global tree canopy cover increased by 2.24 million square kilometers (865,000 square miles) between 1982 and 2016 (Nature, 2018). As well as human intervention, the reasons for this include forests expanding polewards aided by additional CO2 and a slight rise in temperature. Increased CO2 causes this in two ways: it has a direct fertilising effect (the CFE), and it increases drought tolerance by reducing stomata. This greening of the Earth due to CO2 is now "an indisputable fact" (Chen et al, 2024). In fact, 55.15% of those areas greening have been doing so at an accelerated rate since 2001. Since the start of the Industrial Revolution the Earth's primary productivity has increased by more than 30% (Campbell et al, 2017 and Haverd et al, 2020).

  • @sydfrissell
    @sydfrissell 6 днів тому +1

    Climate change is IRREVERSABLE! Get it? The temps will NEVER GO DOWN - unless the CO2 already emitted is TAKEN OUT OF THE AIR! Our future generations can expect a "hothouse Earth", like during the dinosaur age - and this age will last for a long, long, long time.

  • @OldScientist
    @OldScientist 6 днів тому +1

    There has been a 10% decline in natural disasters since 2000 (CRED). Normalised disaster losses have decreased since 1990 and human mortality due to extreme weather has decreased by more than 95% since 1920, so you're 50 times less likely to die from a climate-related disaster in a world that's 1°C warmer than 100 years ago (EM-DAT, CRED/UC). Deaths from drought have declined by 99%!

  • @MunnyMunroe
    @MunnyMunroe 11 днів тому

    I kinda like global warming. Not one day of 30 degree weather in the west of Canada yet where I live, farmers have had to irrigate barely because of the rain. Soil conditions are crazy good right now. Harvests have been better each year for the past 10 years according to farmers. Moisture has been the same after every El Niño event here. Just love it

  • @drawyrral
    @drawyrral 13 днів тому +4

    this is a story about our hubris

    • @bill8985
      @bill8985 13 днів тому +1

      and our unending ability to procreate....

    • @oceancowboy
      @oceancowboy 12 днів тому

      This is a story about profit.

    • @drawyrral
      @drawyrral 12 днів тому

      @@oceancowboy otherwise known as capitalism.

    • @robertmarmaduke186
      @robertmarmaduke186 6 днів тому

      #479 This is a story about unelected self appointed foreign Grifters and Scienters looting Millennials' Boomer Inheritance. FIFY

  • @raphlvlogs271
    @raphlvlogs271 14 днів тому +1

    once again it is neither the strongest nor the most intelligent that will survive it is those that can adapt

    • @ceeemm1901
      @ceeemm1901 14 днів тому

      And those who can punctuate and use CAPITAL letters!!!

  • @mrhappy4521
    @mrhappy4521 14 днів тому +1

    Drive everywhere! It’s the race to extinction!

  • @selvagemlatino7050
    @selvagemlatino7050 13 днів тому

    Em poucos anos o recomeço vai começar sem parar. E vão precisar pensar muito antes . Não pode ter erros biosistêmicos nas tecnologias .
    O planejamento estratégico tem que ser exato. E a execução de obras precisa ocorrer sem falhas .
    Não é uma tarefa para fazer "remendos ou quebra galhos" ( obras que dao defeitos e problemas ) . Vão precisar desmanchar cidades aos poucos e fazer outro tipo de infra estrutura de cidades. E depois construir nelas para morar.
    Acabar com a
    " encrenca "
    ( problemas da Terra ) no jogo da bola.

  • @rdallas81
    @rdallas81 13 днів тому +1

    Cat 4 headed toward Cuba.

  • @bionicman1921
    @bionicman1921 13 днів тому +5

    The earth will be uninhabitable by the year 2060

  • @sahusanalysis7661
    @sahusanalysis7661 12 днів тому +1

    Why still there is only 432 likes so selfish human being shows human itself no interest to stop climate change

  • @carinwiseman4309
    @carinwiseman4309 14 днів тому +8

    This is 5 years old. It is now 2024. Don't be fooled by upload date.

    • @rdallas81
      @rdallas81 13 днів тому +1

      Thank you for sharing that.

    • @gamingtonight1526
      @gamingtonight1526 13 днів тому +8

      And yet everything they said was correct, only it's worse 5 years later!

  • @Darin970
    @Darin970 6 днів тому

    The Earth's tilt shifting closer to the Sun is the major cause of climate change. 🙂😇

    • @robm6803
      @robm6803 4 дні тому

      No. It’s the lizard people!!1! 🙈

    • @karlwheatley1244
      @karlwheatley1244 День тому

      No, thousands of research studies prove that our emissions caused ~98% of global warming since 1900.

  • @muhammad-bin-american
    @muhammad-bin-american 3 дні тому

    I say pray...a lot.

    • @swiftlytiltingplanet8481
      @swiftlytiltingplanet8481 20 годин тому +1

      So pretend that praying actually does something?

    • @muhammad-bin-american
      @muhammad-bin-american 11 годин тому

      @@swiftlytiltingplanet8481 🤣

    • @swiftlytiltingplanet8481
      @swiftlytiltingplanet8481 6 годин тому

      @@muhammad-bin-american If you contract cancer, which would you prefer: chemotherapy or prayer? If you could choose only one, which would it be?

    • @muhammad-bin-american
      @muhammad-bin-american 5 годин тому

      @@swiftlytiltingplanet8481 🤣🤣🤣I say praying to Jehovah is always needed. He makes miracles all the time. You can try it and you will be surprised.

  • @sandipagrawaltalks
    @sandipagrawaltalks День тому

    Deforestation is increasing global warming. We need to plant more trees to reduce carbon dioxide levels.

    • @swiftlytiltingplanet8481
      @swiftlytiltingplanet8481 20 годин тому

      If only it was that simple. Trees under 20 years old actually emit more CO2 than they absorb, according to Oregon State University. Just digging a hole to plant a tree releases more CO2 from the organisms there than the tree will absorb in several years. What we need to do above all else is preserve old-growth forests because that's where the heavy CO2-lifting is done.

  • @gamingtonight1526
    @gamingtonight1526 13 днів тому

    The pot on the hob is the planet, the water in the pot, that is getting hotter and hotter is the climate crisis, and all those frogs, sitting in that slowly boiling water? That's humanity! The last year they quoted was 2019 though, so how old is this video?!

  • @raphlvlogs271
    @raphlvlogs271 14 днів тому

    global issues and trends will always be affecting different parts of the world differently

  • @micklee7018
    @micklee7018 11 днів тому

    You haven't seen anything yet. Our poles are on the move and the magnetosphere is weakening rapidly. The sun is accumalating dust from the galactic spiral arm which will cause it to micronova maybe in the 2030s or 40s. All a part of the 12000 year disaster cycle. We have the jovians just starting there alignment culminating in September giving our solar system a second toroidal magnetic field this leaves us in front of the sun with all the other planets behind us. We have mass movement of fighting age males out of Africa. Mass immigration into Europe and North America. The Bricks nations are getting stronger everyday and their currancy is back by gold. Western countries are likely to see hyper inflation. The above is just the tip of a extremely corrupt iceberg
    We live in a very dangerous world.
    Buckle up buttercups it going to get very rough very soon.

    • @karlwheatley1244
      @karlwheatley1244 День тому

      No, thousands of research studies prove that our emissions caused ~98% of global warming since 1900. It has nothing to do with those other factors you listed.

  • @Timothy-remembers
    @Timothy-remembers 11 днів тому

    Keep on driving- convenience is so worth it-

    • @grmpEqweer
      @grmpEqweer 11 днів тому

      In a lot of cities, for a lot of people, there isn't good public transportation.
      I don't have access to it at all, but if I did, it wouldn't work most of the time with my erratic work schedule.
      If I got off work at 12 am (often), the whole system would be shut down.
      I can't bicycle 30 miles one way.
      ... Having a good public transportation system would be VERY useful for me, if it was there.
      And no, I can't afford to move.

  • @surfskate3
    @surfskate3 12 днів тому

    It's not emissions so much it the amount of people and land use for them food housing travel

    • @imtheeastgermanguy5431
      @imtheeastgermanguy5431 12 днів тому

      Wrong!!!!! It's all about emissions

    • @jthomashair
      @jthomashair 11 днів тому

      Yes, those things... because they lead to more emissions.

    • @HeavyMetal45
      @HeavyMetal45 11 днів тому

      Are you willing to be “one less”? If not then how can you say there are too many people?

  • @volkerengels5298
    @volkerengels5298 14 днів тому +4

    "This is the fastest climate change in earth history." (IPCC 2019 Special Report)
    Events like these usually leads to mass extinction -> more than 75% of all species go extinct.
    The big mammal human might be an exception. Our tech like AC and nukes probably helps us out.

    • @imtheeastgermanguy5431
      @imtheeastgermanguy5431 12 днів тому +1

      Nukes doesn't help and for a you need energy but from where?

    • @volkerengels5298
      @volkerengels5298 12 днів тому +1

      @@imtheeastgermanguy5431
      "This is the fastest climate ch....." is a death sentence for big mammals.
      The AC+Nuke shit - is just sarcasm

    • @imtheeastgermanguy5431
      @imtheeastgermanguy5431 12 днів тому

      @@volkerengels5298 what is going on with you?

    • @volkerengels5298
      @volkerengels5298 12 днів тому

      @@imtheeastgermanguy5431 "This is the fastest climate ch....." - is the important part. If you have questions...

    • @imtheeastgermanguy5431
      @imtheeastgermanguy5431 12 днів тому

      @@volkerengels5298 yes it's a pretty fast climate change. When the dinosaur was dying it was much faster but it wasn't because of the climate change

  • @ceeemm1901
    @ceeemm1901 14 днів тому

    ...and again, Eunice Foote 1856, doesn't get a guernsey. Oh, that's right! As she was back then..."she'a just a chick, what would she know?"

    • @imtheeastgermanguy5431
      @imtheeastgermanguy5431 12 днів тому

      That is your opinion I think that she did great but not really much understood it until now

  • @seanreid349
    @seanreid349 13 днів тому +1

    These scientist are off by 30yrs

    • @imtheeastgermanguy5431
      @imtheeastgermanguy5431 12 днів тому

      Why?

    • @stigsrnning6459
      @stigsrnning6459 7 днів тому

      ​@@imtheeastgermanguy5431 In the future the scientists will know they recommended the whole thing backwards. First of all that excluding every car that emits water vapor (by burning fossil fuels) caused both draught and flood. Without enough vegetation (trees, bushes...) for transpiration at different heights the catastrophe were a fact.
      The relative humidity over both land and sea has been lower and lower for decades now. See on internet the "humidity paradox".

    • @imtheeastgermanguy5431
      @imtheeastgermanguy5431 7 днів тому

      @@stigsrnning6459 no. fossil fuel emits co2 and other gases such as water/steam. co2 is heating up the earth

  • @louisveerapen4589
    @louisveerapen4589 2 дні тому

    What climate change? Isn't it a bit late for that, read the Bible instead, it explains the time we are living now,

    • @swiftlytiltingplanet8481
      @swiftlytiltingplanet8481 20 годин тому

      The Bible explains everything? The same Bible that tells us God drowned everyone on earth except for Noah and his clan? The same Bible that tells us to stone to death homosexuals, people who worship other gods, children who talk back to us and old men who collect wood on the Sabbath? Hmmmmm.

  • @someguy2135
    @someguy2135 13 днів тому +7

    The single most effective way to reduce your impact on the environment is to switch to a plant-based diet

    • @duanecarroll8255
      @duanecarroll8255 13 днів тому

      Plant based transportation!

    • @someguy2135
      @someguy2135 13 днів тому

      @@duanecarroll8255 the United Nations reported that animal agriculture produces more greenhouse gases then combining all transportation

    • @bill8985
      @bill8985 13 днів тому +1

      The single most effective way to reduce your impact is to have fewer children. Full stop.

    • @duanecarroll8255
      @duanecarroll8255 12 днів тому

      @@someguy2135 Are we feeding livestock crude oil?

    • @imtheeastgermanguy5431
      @imtheeastgermanguy5431 12 днів тому

      ​@@bill8985no

  • @musicalhost5755
    @musicalhost5755 14 днів тому

    Ai papi! El fin del mundo!

    • @someguy2135
      @someguy2135 13 днів тому +1

      To paraphrase George Carlin- The planet will live forever. Humans the other hand, will not. Especially if we don't change significantly and soon.

  • @phackqu
    @phackqu 13 днів тому

    The sun is in a solar maximum.

    • @duanecarroll8255
      @duanecarroll8255 13 днів тому +3

      Please publish your amazing research on this subject, and get a NOBEL PRIZE!

    • @amilias1000
      @amilias1000 13 днів тому +2

      That cycle happens every 11 years. Not the problem.

    • @imtheeastgermanguy5431
      @imtheeastgermanguy5431 12 днів тому

      No

    • @imtheeastgermanguy5431
      @imtheeastgermanguy5431 12 днів тому

      ​@@amilias1000you mean the sun cycle?

    • @Me97202
      @Me97202 11 днів тому +1

      Trillions of tons of co2 released every year. You don’t think that’s maybe a factor?

  • @bobsthea
    @bobsthea 14 днів тому +1

    cool, finally we al can get rid off that pesky snow and headed to hot beach more often

    • @ceeemm1901
      @ceeemm1901 14 днів тому +3

      And watch the climate refugees come ashore, haha.

    • @jeffreyburkins5334
      @jeffreyburkins5334 13 днів тому +2

      Uh, the ocean is gonna claim the coast. No beach. No beach houses.

    • @imtheeastgermanguy5431
      @imtheeastgermanguy5431 12 днів тому +1

      Yeah did you even understand just a bit what the problem is?

    • @imtheeastgermanguy5431
      @imtheeastgermanguy5431 12 днів тому

      ​@@ceeemm1901I think that there will be so much that they can walk over the water with all the dead bodies underneath 😢😢😢

  • @davidfromamerica1871
    @davidfromamerica1871 13 днів тому

    Wait when the Skyscrapers start falling down..😄

    • @imtheeastgermanguy5431
      @imtheeastgermanguy5431 12 днів тому +1

      Funny?? what is wrong with you?

    • @davidfromamerica1871
      @davidfromamerica1871 12 днів тому

      @@imtheeastgermanguy5431
      Over active imagination.😀

    • @imtheeastgermanguy5431
      @imtheeastgermanguy5431 12 днів тому +1

      @@davidfromamerica1871 you know that drugs aren't good for the human body and brain

    • @davidfromamerica1871
      @davidfromamerica1871 12 днів тому

      @@imtheeastgermanguy5431
      That is not what my psychiatrist tells me.🥸
      Psychiatric medication for schizophrenia.😵‍💫😍😎👍

  • @danhove
    @danhove 2 години тому

    How about global warming

  • @pauls7317
    @pauls7317 15 днів тому +3

    Nope

    • @ionymous6733
      @ionymous6733 15 днів тому +3

      Smell smoke in your house. Could it be a fire?
      "Nope. Go back to sleep." If right: No wasted effort. If wrong: Lost house, life, family.
      "Maybe/Yep. Take action." If right: Save house, life, family. If wrong: Wasted effort.
      "Nope" is the only option with dire consequences.

    • @momzilla9491
      @momzilla9491 15 днів тому

      @@ionymous6733 I watched a simple experiment with a transparent Water Tank on a movable leveller years ago here on YT.
      Looked for it really hard last summer, but it's gone.
      The demonstration proved that an Oil Spill could stop and even reverse the current.
      Don't be so quick to think it's Up There, when it may be Down There. Which scenario do you think could pull the
      greatest amount of Tax Dollars from our pockets?

    • @worzi3
      @worzi3 14 днів тому +2

      @@ionymous6733 Better safe than sorry!

    • @imtheeastgermanguy5431
      @imtheeastgermanguy5431 12 днів тому

      Ignoring facts will kill you

  • @jimanderson2518
    @jimanderson2518 14 днів тому +2

    All B.S. All B.S. ALL B.S.

    • @Bushman9
      @Bushman9 14 днів тому +2

      Wild the way they made all those fake videos.

    • @imtheeastgermanguy5431
      @imtheeastgermanguy5431 12 днів тому +1

      ​@@Bushman9they can proof what they are saying

    • @imtheeastgermanguy5431
      @imtheeastgermanguy5431 12 днів тому

      It's no BS!!!

    • @jthomashair
      @jthomashair 11 днів тому +1

      Literally a child putting your fingers in your ears and closing your eyes

    • @Bushman9
      @Bushman9 11 днів тому

      @@jthomashair Sadly though, this “child” can vote.

  • @larragunn2809
    @larragunn2809 13 днів тому

    😂 timeline is a little off