@@francescobaldini1536 please take a look on any game where is marked an offside. you'll see that the keeper (a player) is always btw the goal line and the pass. if you replace the goalkeeper for other player, is the same thing. it is OFFSIDE
@@giomessi2000 you don't know anything, you have to be behind the line of the last 2 rival players or behind the line of the ball, otherwise it's offside
@@samyou5535 The rule is Goalkeeper + 1 defender, means at least 2 players. Else there is not offside. According to this rule, it is offside here since it's only 1 defender.
@@samyou5535 Nope, the offside rule counts for the last 2 players of the opposite team...so most of the time it counts for the last defender because the goalkeeper regulary is in the goal and in this case there is only one Player after the striker because the keeper ran out his goal so far, so he is in offside because there was only one player behind the ball
My guess is that maybe she wasnt wearing underwear and thats a total guess Im making because the shorts was glued to her ass and I couldnt see any underlines, but other than guessing that I have no idea either.
3:19 that was offside. The rule is that the player should be covered by 2 players. The one has to be the goalkeeper and the second will be a defender. In that case the player was counted as the goalkeeper and there weren't any other players. It was just that 1 player, so it was a fair desicion
3:21 That was a totally legitimate offside. I suggest you learning the rules of the game properly, since you create football related content. And the rules say that: a pass recieving player shall be considered ON-side, if there are at least 2 players of the opposing team closer to the goal. Remember, goalie is still a player!
You’re completely right. Once the commentator ruled a throw-in offside not knowing you can’t be offside receiving the ball directly from a goal kick, a corner kick, or a throw-in.
@@danny7537 if you reas the rule i doesnt say the last player... But theas two players If it was the last player theres was never offsides because the keeper is a player too But comentador allways say the last player like the last defender. And 99% of persons think that the keeper doesn't belong to the mats
Sergio Ramos got a red card in order to complete a cycle of cards, thus he wouldn't play the next match which was not important but would play the rest of the matches without cards
3:21 La regla dice que no puede estar adelantado al penúltimo defensor, en este caso el penúltimo defensor es el portero, no el jugador sobre la línea de gol Fuera de juego claro
3:19 - Not sure what's the "WHY?" moment is here or why defender on the line is being highlighted? Vela *is* offside and the goal was ruled out correctly. It's not one player that has to be between you and the end line, it's two. One of those two is normally the goalie, which is why we normally think in terms of one defender, but on this occasion the goalie's the wrong side of Vela to count. Commentator even says it.
No, it is not like that, in the area is the goalie the one who mark the offside not the defender but outside the area there is only one player needed to be onside
The Why moment is that he should not have touched the ball when the ball is already going into the net. If he didn’t touch the ball there would not be an offside and the goal would be good instead of being waived off
@@mathmols8835 it wasn’t going way wide😂 the reason it’s on fails is because he didn’t have to kick it and he was offside, look at it again, he kicks the ball directly forward 🤦🏼♂️
3:19 People who write that this is not about the offside, but rather that Vela touched the Ball in a offside position when it was going, clearly need glasses. Vela first take the Ball with his chest and then kick it in, the Ball was no where near going in the goal
If I remember right Balotelli thought he was offside and that the ref had blown the whistle hence why he did the back heel. You can tell by how shocked he was that everyone was so angry.
The offside moment at 3:21 is offside because the player is behind the goalkeeper. Also, the thumbnail clip was purely clickbait, wasn't it? What 'Why?' was there??
@@jacopo1996 Manchini didnt care though. He almost started a boxing fight with Balotelli that day, even after Balotelli explained the whistle he heard to him. 🤣🤣🤣
7:13 The idea of Pepe trying to be the voice of reason in any situation. OMFG Pepe: What were you thinking Collective Existence: Pepe, you have never once used your head.
@@mateuspassos4167 respondendo pelo amigo, é impedimento válido sim... É que como não é muito comum o pessoal confunde bastante, mas já tem um bom tempo que é assim
I WATCHED THAT LIVE IT WAS BULLY GAME FROM EVERY SIDE. AND I CANT STAND CHELSEA CAUSE IOM ARSENAL AND HENRY FAN. BUT LIVERPOOL WAS BULLY TOO ENTIRE GAME. REF JUST LET THEM PLAY HARD OLD SCHOOL.
@@Scourging Is this your other account? The WHY moment was clearly for the offside call. He even highlighted the player that was inside the post just to prove the opposition player wasn't offside. Take another L for being clueless and confused.
@@skyshooter4009 Or it was to highlight the fact that he was indeed offside and he touched the ball, who knows what he meant by what he highlighted. Btw it isnt hard to answer someone without being so aggresive xD u take things so seriously
@@Scourging if he was trying to show the player was indeed offside the highlighted area won’t be there, it will be between him and the 2nd last defender then. you are actually clueless aren’t you
Well Ramos did it to waste time to help his team win as the ref had to cycle the cards wasting more time, you can even see he did not care about it as he knew it will cause a red.
Not at all they both did it to get a suspension for the 6th and final game of group stages since they had yellows before, were qualified already and might miss the first game 2nd round, so better to miss that 6th game Has nothing to do with wasting time to win the game, especially if they made two players get sent off
@Andrea Carney Yeah they did that to waste time and help their team by getting two players sent off, those 20 seconds of waiting sure determined the win which they didnt need since they were qualified the match before and only Ajax cared about the game
@@mathmols8835 Flight of the ball looks like it could still have gone into the corner. I feel that's clearly the intent of the clip. The offside line and commentators made it very clear that it is an accepted offside so I don't see how that can be confused.
1:30 the next game was easy and both Ramos and Alonso were risking being suspended if they get another yellow in it so they'll miss the next round, so morenho told them to get a red card, this way they'll miss the easy game not the next round 3:14 are you blind?! It is clearly offside! There's only one opponent behind him and the rule states that it must be at least two to break the offside trap!! (Hi educate yourself a little) 6:06 he was talking to a guy in the next chair the camera didn't catch him 6:15 after he moved from arsenal in a controversial way arsenal fans discriminated him so he had to take revenge 6:32 the ball clearly didn't cross the line the stupid goalkeeper thought it did and left his net empty to celebrate so his team conceded an easy goal 7:52 balottelie is the most bullied player by fans idk why! He wasn't showbating and he didn't even tried to score with that truck, also it was a worthless friendly game!! However the real reason he did that was that he heard a whistle and thought that the referee said offside so he gave up the ball to the keeper
@@crazycurax5406 Look closely The ball hit the post and rebound out It cannot physically cross the line and then come out from the goal like that!!! You can check with the shadow of the ball It didn't cross the line
1:30 It was a 200iq play, their next game was not relevant, Mou deleted Ramos's and Xabi's yellow cards with a 5th yellow. Edit: Or 4th, I don't know the rules, but they were not allowed to play in the next game and their cards was cancelled.
@@scottwallbank4794 No, the intention of this clip was to judge why the referee saw that as offside. And yeah if someone don’t know the offside rule would judge it as crazy WHY? moment If you watch the original clip the commentators were also amazed about the decision
*Enjoy 😜*
PART 2: ua-cam.com/video/uGp625drhKc/v-deo.html
3:21 if you know rules of offside, it isn`t actually "WHY" moment. it`s definitely offiside
It wasn't offside because there was a man on the line
@@francescobaldini1536 read the rules pls. Rly Sad if u think this wasnt offside
@@francescobaldini1536 it was opponent`s LAST man 😀😀 that`s why here is offside
@@francescobaldini1536 please take a look on any game where is marked an offside. you'll see that the keeper (a player) is always btw the goal line and the pass. if you replace the goalkeeper for other player, is the same thing. it is OFFSIDE
@@giomessi2000 you don't know anything, you have to be behind the line of the last 2 rival players or behind the line of the ball, otherwise it's offside
3:24 offsides is you have to be behind 2 players normally 1 is the keeper
correct
Impedimento bem marcado.
didnt know it had to be 2 players...including the keeper
@@bruniuss it's 2 players including or excluding the keeper..just 2 players
There's your answer "why". People really don't know the game
3:15 people who think this is not offside know nothing about football
It is offside because the last man on the line acts as a goalkeeper
👍
@@samyou5535 yea
@@samyou5535 The rule is Goalkeeper + 1 defender, means at least 2 players. Else there is not offside. According to this rule, it is offside here since it's only 1 defender.
@@samyou5535 Nope, the offside rule counts for the last 2 players of the opposite team...so most of the time it counts for the last defender because the goalkeeper regulary is in the goal
and in this case there is only one Player after the striker because the keeper ran out his goal so far, so he is in offside because there was only one player behind the ball
Should have waited till AFCON was finished for a much longer video 😂
I don't understand why Alisha Lehmann being subbed into a game is a "why" moment. Alguien me lo puede explicar?
My guess is that maybe she wasnt wearing underwear and thats a total guess Im making because the shorts was glued to her ass and I couldnt see any underlines, but other than guessing that I have no idea either.
Butt clickbait I guess
Dupcie ma niezłą dlatego
i thought the number was wrong, she was 23 it said 22. but ya for the butt clickbait for sure.
Oh wait no it was right, just Butt clickbait lol I thought the 23 was a 29. Im wrong
*2:35** You are here for this*
but i dont get why was it craziest "why" moment
@@chessten i think its just for clickbait
@@chessten that is the bait.
Thanks bro
@@kleask1552 probably, that's why its the craziest "why" moment, since most would be asking ... why?? :P
xabi alonso was in the yellow card limit. the next match was a trivial match. He deliberately received the 2nd yellow card to end the limit.
Him, Ramos and Mourinho got punished. Ramos and Xabi got 2 matches ban if i remember correct.
The video ia so genuine even that thumbnail made me go "why?"😂
Same 😀
P
3:19 that was offside. The rule is that the player should be covered by 2 players. The one has to be the goalkeeper and the second will be a defender. In that case the player was counted as the goalkeeper and there weren't any other players. It was just that 1 player, so it was a fair desicion
But WHY did the player touch the ball when it was going in already
@@reginald8947 cause it wasn't bro
Infinity boy: good analysis! Some basic rules that we all fergot about...
@@reginald8947 not even close
I turned off after I saw that 😂 The creator doesn’t even know the rules of the game
2:39...the best of the best !!!
4:05 Honestly I feel bad for this man. You can see how sad he is. D:
Yeah he got fucked over by the pitch
Yeah even his face right after the blunder.. so sad
Lmao but that dumbass dive tho kind of his own mistake
u dun hv to feel bad for him coz his bank is filled with bookmaker's money :D
3:21
That was a totally legitimate offside.
I suggest you learning the rules of the game properly, since you create football related content.
And the rules say that: a pass recieving player shall be considered ON-side, if there are at least 2 players of the opposing team closer to the goal. Remember, goalie is still a player!
This is what happens when people dont know the rules... they complain without knowing
you'll be amazed how many people don't know the rules man...
You’re completely right. Once the commentator ruled a throw-in offside not knowing you can’t be offside receiving the ball directly from a goal kick, a corner kick, or a throw-in.
Yeah that's why it was unecessary to touch the ball because it would have gon in anyway
@@danny7537 if you reas the rule i doesnt say the last player...
But theas two players
If it was the last player theres was never offsides because the keeper is a player too
But comentador allways say the last player like the last defender. And 99% of persons think that the keeper doesn't belong to the mats
3:22 He was indeed offside.
I think Lehmann is your favorite, you include her in all your thumbnail
God tier arse
To be fair, who wouldn't
What's the name of that song and artist?
@@nevamore1984 yeh been waiting 3 weeks for that one pal haha
@@callumrowley9810 We'll f***ing never find out, dude 🤣
@ 7:17 LMFAO he held on for dear life!
3:56 For those who don't understand Italian, the goal was scored at 93rd minute.
Sergio Ramos got a red card in order to complete a cycle of cards, thus he wouldn't play the next match which was not important but would play the rest of the matches without cards
Tried that one again against Ajax in 2019. 4-1, baby, 4-1 😎
@@hardanheavy ajax makes great talents
Yep, clearly this video is by someone who doesn't know football. The gamesmanship for those two red cards is now infamous.
So did Alonso
@@moeenuddin6467 exactly
Great compilation
Zlatan is such a piece of work!
6:38 lol
3:19のところは最終ラインにいるフィールドの選手がオフサイドラインではなく後ろから2番めの人がオフサイドラインになっているためキーパーの前にいるセンターバックなどがオフサイドラインだと勘違いする人が多い。なのでこの場合はゴールに立っているディフェンスのもう一個前にいるキーパーがオフサイドライン。
結論オフサイド！
Lehmann, nice player 👍😉
6:28 que diablos paso ahí???
3:21 La regla dice que no puede estar adelantado al penúltimo defensor, en este caso el penúltimo defensor es el portero, no el jugador sobre la línea de gol
Fuera de juego claro
Cierto. Como casi siempre es el arquero el último hombre, mucha gente se confunde
Поржал от души, спасибо 😁
amazing video bro. you are good at what you do⚽⚽⚽❤️❤️❤️
1:38 Hello Adolf xD
Bro the player who just forgot the socks seconds before enter on the game, makes me laugh like never before 😂😂 4:20
Quien más vino por la miniatura de Alisha Lehman ?
This is why I love football games..sometimes have more epic drama scene than telenovela, korean drama or even bollywood movie 😂
El gol de thiago es increíble! Nunca había visto algo así..
3:19 - Not sure what's the "WHY?" moment is here or why defender on the line is being highlighted? Vela *is* offside and the goal was ruled out correctly. It's not one player that has to be between you and the end line, it's two. One of those two is normally the goalie, which is why we normally think in terms of one defender, but on this occasion the goalie's the wrong side of Vela to count.
Commentator even says it.
No, it is not like that, in the area is the goalie the one who mark the offside not the defender but outside the area there is only one player needed to be onside
@@jorgevaldes1542 his offside. Just shut up
If you don’t know anything about the sport, then don’t talk
The Why moment is that he should not have touched the ball when the ball is already going into the net. If he didn’t touch the ball there would not be an offside and the goal would be good instead of being waived off
@@CCC-gi1cq Bro the ball would have missed the goal by miles
6:27 the keeper thought some few steps ahead😂😂😂 . It was a set up
wasn't it a goal though? i didn't get that one lol
@@ashleycollinge4491 it ddnt go in. It hit the woodwork lol
Lol I thought it bounced off the back off the net and came back into play and the ref never seen it 😆 After rewatching it, yeah it hits the post!
2:40 is not a why moment, it's a hell yes moment.
2:35 🤤
bro get a life
0:38 It worked. The guy was back up in a sec 🤣
Zlatan always smiled !hasha
Sangat sangat menghibur
Sukses selalu
Sehat sehat selalu
2:10 XD?
3:31 The Lord Fred 🔥
2:35 Alisha Lehman
genius
Why was that clip in the video? Im confused....
@@matthewbeher8910 For views
@@rezku8808 ahh...makes sense
Wow. Stay relaxed.
3:19 it was right, right? The defender become the last man/Keeper bcause the keeper in front of him. So it was offside
Indeed
No, the point is that the goal was going in so he could’ve just left the ball all together
@@Azoria4 You need glasses, he take the Ball with his chest and then kick it in, the shot was going way wide
@@mathmols8835 it wasn’t going way wide😂 the reason it’s on fails is because he didn’t have to kick it and he was offside, look at it again, he kicks the ball directly forward 🤦🏼♂️
@@Azoria4 How blind Can you literally be? He take the Ball down with his chest and then kick it in. If you cant even see that You clearly need glasses
6:05 Guardiola🤣🤣🤣
The funniest moment is the referee of Africa, he stopped the match in minute 85, so funny.
He cepirit
it was not funny... he was ill
Ever heard of sun stroke??
@@thegr8_stephen372 you're right
@@razizaidi2460 he had stomatch pain at that time that he could not run, he must stopped the match
3:19 People who write that this is not about the offside, but rather that Vela touched the Ball in a offside position when it was going, clearly need glasses. Vela first take the Ball with his chest and then kick it in, the Ball was no where near going in the goal
Ibrahimovic, el animal del fútbol!!!
If I remember right Balotelli thought he was offside and that the ref had blown the whistle hence why he did the back heel. You can tell by how shocked he was that everyone was so angry.
3:20 offside 100% C. Vela
yep. People should study football rules before commenting anything.
AMAZING 🥶
3:19 the arbitre right
This video is INSANE
0:39 HAHAHAHAHAHAHA😂😂😂
7:17 really funny 🤣. And refree is just running behind them
The offside moment at 3:21 is offside because the player is behind the goalkeeper.
Also, the thumbnail clip was purely clickbait, wasn't it? What 'Why?' was there??
Balotelli part is the most why moment in history of football.
nope, someone in the crowd blew a whistle (you can hear it) and balotelli thought it was from the ref, so balotelli stopped and did that.
@@aryabima256 ooo now i know why
@@aryabima256 Yea, and it was the most useless match of the season. Pre season tournament in USA. Bullshit
@@aryabima256 Confermo, è andata così.
@@jacopo1996 Manchini didnt care though. He almost started a boxing fight with Balotelli that day, even after Balotelli explained the whistle he heard to him. 🤣🤣🤣
Mancini wants Balotelli in national team... Why ? 😂
7:24
The Best simulation of history
7:13 The idea of Pepe trying to be the voice of reason in any situation. OMFG
Pepe: What were you thinking
Collective Existence: Pepe, you have never once used your head.
Fucking Pepe teaching Messi about cool heads... Lol. This was probably among those rare moments that Messi got angry.
2:40 el melhor momento
I dont understand the "why" in that part.
@@chadyoung6884 i think because she is not wearing underwear just the shoorts
@@Juhoty.x9 lol
That goal by thiago,wow
Ronaldo's revenge for his teammate 🔥🔥
2:35 how is that a why moment
Because I'm wondering why she isn't mine
Minuto 3:21 realmente tá impedido... Goleiro e o último homem .. essa regra surgiu de uns tempos pra cá..
@@mateuspassos4167 na regra está penúltimo homem, não ultimo..
Último seria contando com o goleiro
@@mateuspassos4167 respondendo pelo amigo, é impedimento válido sim... É que como não é muito comum o pessoal confunde bastante, mas já tem um bom tempo que é assim
7:16
my man was surfing 😂😂
@@mateuspassos4167 não conta.. goleiro e o último homem. A regra e clara..
a regra não surgiu há uns tempos. A regra existe desde 1925
Why I am not surprised seeing Balotelli, Ramos and Ibra in the vid?
Good morning, no late, ha ha ha ha ha...
2:36 The only I don't understand in this video 🤔 what the ...
Same
same
04:54 no red card for Bosingwa. Wow.
I WATCHED THAT LIVE IT WAS BULLY GAME FROM EVERY SIDE. AND I CANT STAND CHELSEA CAUSE IOM ARSENAL AND HENRY FAN. BUT LIVERPOOL WAS BULLY TOO ENTIRE GAME. REF JUST LET THEM PLAY HARD OLD SCHOOL.
Fin de Match Tunisie 🇹🇳. Mali 🇲🇱. !!!! Incroyable
Alguien me puede explicar el ultimo clip?
Someone can explain me the last clip?
afcon is the best tournament no doubt
Nope
Yeah they're memes😂
@@kengbrissy3074 😂😂😂😂😂
85分で試合終わらせた主審すげーな
Num sei piá
wow amazing
I still remember the when I was watching the match when ballotelli made that history.. I was like wtf is wrong with him
3:19 was a clear offside. The WHY moment goes out to you for being clueless.
The clueless in this case is you, the WHY moment is why did that player touch the ball when it was going inside.
@@Scourging Is this your other account? The WHY moment was clearly for the offside call. He even highlighted the player that was inside the post just to prove the opposition player wasn't offside. Take another L for being clueless and confused.
@@skyshooter4009 Or it was to highlight the fact that he was indeed offside and he touched the ball, who knows what he meant by what he highlighted.
Btw it isnt hard to answer someone without being so aggresive xD u take things so seriously
@@Scourging Try look at the video again, the take the Ball with his chest and Then kick it in, the shot was going Way past the goal
@@Scourging if he was trying to show the player was indeed offside the highlighted area won’t be there, it will be between him and the 2nd last defender then. you are actually clueless aren’t you
Man U vs arsenal imagine getting a goal when the goalie is down and still losing. RIP…..
HELLO FRIENDS SHARE VERY GOOD AND INTERESTING VIDEOS
The last one he thought he heard a whistle
O futebol é mesmo incrível, tem de tudo num jogo
3:44 it wasn't a foul because he didn't get violated by an opponent. He was violated by a teammate so there wasn't a foul play
wait wat?
3:10 , I agree, Carlos Vela is indeed offside
Whyy whyyy 🦅🦅
I'd have loved it if Ajax would have scored after the two reds
That would be Perfect karma
1:08 Rashford was upset, he was wide open but his team mate didn't pass the ball
4:06 today I learned a new word. "incredibiliteee.."
RIP Zlatan Ibrahimovic 😝
Alonso and Ramos deserved recieving Red Card 100%
Well Ramos did it to waste time to help his team win as the ref had to cycle the cards wasting more time, you can even see he did not care about it as he knew it will cause a red.
Strategy from coaching staff, not to win but clean up the yellow card. The old rule of UEFA.
Not at all they both did it to get a suspension for the 6th and final game of group stages since they had yellows before, were qualified already and might miss the first game 2nd round, so better to miss that 6th game
Has nothing to do with wasting time to win the game, especially if they made two players get sent off
@Andrea Carney
Yeah they did that to waste time and help their team by getting two players sent off, those 20 seconds of waiting sure determined the win which they didnt need since they were qualified the match before and only Ajax cared about the game
3:20 the creator didn't know offside rule 🤣 it's obviously offside
It's about why he felt the need to touch it when it was going in, not the offside decision itself. How is it that hard for people to get?
@@scottwallbank4794 Did you actually watch the clip? He took the ball with his chest and then kicked it in, it was no where near going in the goal
@@mathmols8835 Flight of the ball looks like it could still have gone into the corner. I feel that's clearly the intent of the clip. The offside line and commentators made it very clear that it is an accepted offside so I don't see how that can be confused.
That rash Ford own pained me. I watched the match😠😤
Em um relacionamento sério com o replay e aos 2:40
Quem é essa coisa maravilhosa??
2:35 expliquenme xfa :v
Creo que solo puso ese clip para ponerlo de miniatura y asi tener más visitas
7:58 what was the keeper trying to do, like what!!!??? I can't understand what was he trying to do
Trying to waste time, trying to bait fouls or trying to frustrate the opponents. Maybe a combination of all three.
6.39 .... What????? Hahaha
So no one will talk about Pep Guardiola talking to himself
1:30 the next game was easy and both Ramos and Alonso were risking being suspended if they get another yellow in it so they'll miss the next round, so morenho told them to get a red card, this way they'll miss the easy game not the next round
3:14 are you blind?! It is clearly offside! There's only one opponent behind him and the rule states that it must be at least two to break the offside trap!! (Hi educate yourself a little)
6:06 he was talking to a guy in the next chair the camera didn't catch him
6:15 after he moved from arsenal in a controversial way arsenal fans discriminated him so he had to take revenge
6:32 the ball clearly didn't cross the line the stupid goalkeeper thought it did and left his net empty to celebrate so his team conceded an easy goal
7:52 balottelie is the most bullied player by fans idk why!
He wasn't showbating and he didn't even tried to score with that truck, also it was a worthless friendly game!!
However the real reason he did that was that he heard a whistle and thought that the referee said offside so he gave up the ball to the keeper
6:32 was cleary BEHIND
@@crazycurax5406
Look closely
The ball hit the post and rebound out
It cannot physically cross the line and then come out from the goal like that!!!
You can check with the shadow of the ball
It didn't cross the line
1:30 It was a 200iq play, their next game was not relevant, Mou deleted Ramos's and Xabi's yellow cards with a 5th yellow.
Edit: Or 4th, I don't know the rules, but they were not allowed to play in the next game and their cards was cancelled.
2:48 la Jorobiña de Cuahutemoc xD
5:27 👍👍 CR and Friend
3:11 biggest mistake of this video
It's about why he felt the need to touch it when it was going in, not the offside decision itself. How is it that hard for people to get?
@@scottwallbank4794 it was not going in
He had to touch it to convert it
@@gardenjourney Eh? It was clearly going into the corner. Anyway, that's the intention of the video, not the offside rules.
@@scottwallbank4794 No, the intention of this clip was to judge why the referee saw that as offside.
And yeah if someone don’t know the offside rule would judge it as crazy WHY? moment
If you watch the original clip the commentators were also amazed about the decision
@@gardenjourney No they weren't. When they do the offside lines they even comment that he's ahead of the goalkeeper with a defender on the line.