walau saya belum mencoba lensa yang sedang dibahas ini, tapi saya tidak meragukan kemampuan dari kamera dan lensa Fujifilm. itulah kenapa hampir 100% video dichannel saya semua nya hasil dari kamera dan lensa FUJIFILM....
When I make the move to GFX from my X-T3, I'm looking at either this lens or the 32- 63mm zoom to start out. Anyone shoot with both extensively? Preferences?
I own both. I recently bought the 32-64 because I wanted a bit more on the wide side. 45 for me is sometimes not wide enough. Both lenses are very sharp, but the 45-100 is slightly better in the corners. With very sharp I mean that you will not believe your eyes coming from full frame (and even more coming from APS-C). The 45-100 has OIS; the 32-64 has not, but if you are going for a GFX100s that is not a problem. If you are more a wide angle/ landscape shooter, the 32-64 might a better choice. If not, I would go for the 45-100. With either you can't go wrong.
I love my Fujifilm. I own the xt3 and the xt4. And I’m planning to go MF. But I don’t see why they aren’t making F1.2, F1.4 or even 1.8 lens?! You have such a big sensor to create some beautiful bokeh with details and yet full frame cameras create more bokeh. I get that Fuji don’t want to compete with the full frame market, but give us some wide aperture lens at least.
@@clopotari147 I never said you “need” it. I was just making an example. But it would be nice to have. If I’m shooting at night, that wide aperture would allow much more light to come through the sensor without having to lower shutter speeds or turn up your iso.
@@justcallmesando that 80mm F1.7 is equivalent to an 63mm F1.3 Full frame which is a great lens! Fuji’s whole marketing is you don’t need full frame, just go MF. That’s why they are making cheaper MF models. So make Lens with apertures that the full frame market is looking for. That’s all I’m saying.
La Fuji film mi aveva intusiasmato ma dal momento che mandi in assistenza le macchine e accessori risolvono il problema dicendo che la spesa per ripararla è troppo elevata per la riparazione sei costretto a comprare altro molto deluso
Thank you Fujifilm, it is an honour...
Glad to see an official dedicated video about this lens
令和４年春にGFX へお引っ越し。(笑)
35-70 100-200 20-35と一揃え有るけど、35mm 換算で80mm 前後欲しくなった‼️(笑)
FUJI のラージフォーマットとフィルムシミュレーションに馴染むと35mm フルサイズには戻れない❗(笑)
官能的な描写が堪らない。(笑)
walau saya belum mencoba lensa yang sedang dibahas ini, tapi saya tidak meragukan kemampuan dari kamera dan lensa Fujifilm.
itulah kenapa hampir 100% video dichannel saya semua nya hasil dari kamera dan lensa FUJIFILM....
When I make the move to GFX from my X-T3, I'm looking at either this lens or the 32- 63mm zoom to start out. Anyone shoot with both extensively? Preferences?
I own both. I recently bought the 32-64 because I wanted a bit more on the wide side. 45 for me is sometimes not wide enough. Both lenses are very sharp, but the 45-100 is slightly better in the corners. With very sharp I mean that you will not believe your eyes coming from full frame (and even more coming from APS-C). The 45-100 has OIS; the 32-64 has not, but if you are going for a GFX100s that is not a problem.
If you are more a wide angle/ landscape shooter, the 32-64 might a better choice. If not, I would go for the 45-100. With either you can't go wrong.
Mine is on a FedEx truck right now, held up by the blizzard.
Don't you want to take me as an ambassador so that I can work with this wonder and promote it 😅
I love my Fujifilm. I own the xt3 and the xt4. And I’m planning to go MF. But I don’t see why they aren’t making F1.2, F1.4 or even 1.8 lens?! You have such a big sensor to create some beautiful bokeh with details and yet full frame cameras create more bokeh. I get that Fuji don’t want to compete with the full frame market, but give us some wide aperture lens at least.
Why do u need 1.2 on MF?
@@clopotari147 I never said you “need” it. I was just making an example. But it would be nice to have. If I’m shooting at night, that wide aperture would allow much more light to come through the sensor without having to lower shutter speeds or turn up your iso.
The 80mm 1.7 in medium format is just crazy
@@justcallmesando yes I can appreciate that lens. They need to make more of these instead of only F4 lens
@@justcallmesando that 80mm F1.7 is equivalent to an 63mm F1.3 Full frame which is a great lens! Fuji’s whole marketing is you don’t need full frame, just go MF. That’s why they are making cheaper MF models. So make Lens with apertures that the full frame market is looking for. That’s all I’m saying.
La Fuji film mi aveva intusiasmato ma dal momento che mandi in assistenza le macchine e accessori risolvono il problema dicendo che la spesa per ripararla è troppo elevata per la riparazione sei costretto a comprare altro molto deluso
Fujifilm please Sub Vietnames, Thanks
Not enough bokeh from medium format