It's a bad thing. We are not meant to mess with his creation. When you change his design or modify his creation, your wrong. RFID chip, mark of beast. Nanotech is so wrong.
Nanotechnology hardware used properly ? Nanotech Medical Procedures? Most Scientists have good intentions but the Companies who own them are only interested in Money. Nanotechnology is the precursor to Transhumanism as well as being Lethal Bio Weapon of mind blowing proportions. Genomic Hacking could become an industry in itself.
Who knows the mind of God?....he lost me when he made the remark. .."what does God think"..... This man claims to be a Christian but obviously its only a label. He has no concept of who God truly is otherwise he would have known God's thoughts are unfathonable
Incredible the amount of Christians who condemn others and think their interpretations of the Scriptures is better than others. This man's sense of ethics should be applauded. He is conscious of always trying to do good and respectful of Creation.
This speaker is an open-minded scientist. He senses the BIG-PICTURE of existence. So what's wrong about believing in God while you are being a scientist? As long as you do your scientific research and experiments based on realistic evidence-based facts; on the side,----you can believe anything that your intuition is suggesting to you to believe.
Brilliant and enjoyable explanation. Thank you. “For his invisible qualities are clearly seen from the world’s creation onward, because they are perceived by the things made, even his eternal power and Godship, so that they are inexcusable.... You are worthy, Jehovah our God, to receive the glory and the honor and the power, because you created all things, and because of your will they came into existence and were created.” Romans 1:20; Revelation 4:11
One may be a carpenter, physician, author, mechanic, captain, fisherman, plumber, or even a gangster and believe in God. But NEVER EVER NEVER a scientist ~ according to the UA-cam gods of judgment & wrath almighty....
Luke 17:33 [33]Whosoever shall seek to save his life shall lose it; and whosoever shall lose his life shall preserve it. Todo el que procure salvar su vida, la perderá; y todo el que la pierda, la salvará.
Time stamp 17:10. Not true. We are clueless on how we went front a sterile elemental environment to life. We know what chemicals are needed but there’s no WAY it happened in a “primordial soup” scenario. Look up James Tour. This is his field.
I'm an atheist, I think it's cool that he's religious, tbh I'm always desperate to hear a religious view from a scientist. BUT, what is that weird stuff about God telling us not to destroy the planet with nanotech? Are atheist nanotechnologists likely to destroy the planet because they haven't read the bible, so couldn't care less? (and why is he not wearing shoes?)
I'm a christian, but I must agree with you. I strongly doubt that atheist nanotechnologists would be any less careful than Christian ones. In fact, based on what I know about my Christian brothers and sisters right now, I am inclined to think that we need christian scientists to learn from their athiest counterparts in order to break out of the many religious restrictions hindering their ability to learn stuff that seem scary to many of their religious leaders.
It's because there is power in the possible uses for nanotech and with power comes immense responsibility. It can be used for good or for bad. It's like the discovery of splitting an atom. It can be used to power a whole city with clean energy or it can flatten the same city to the ground and every living thing within it!
@elijaprice Balls i don't think he _meant_ to imply that atheists don't care about harming the planet. i actually think he was _trying_ to say the exact opposite. i thought it was directed toward other Christians because Christians tend _not_ to be highly concerned when it comes to environmental issues. as a Christian, it sounded like he was telling other Christians that _we_ aren't concerned _enough_ about the environment. (btw, i didn't even notice the lack of shoes.)
Has he never read the bible and all the stories about god commanding the complete destruction of other societies, commanding the slaughtering of man, woman, child and beast belonging to the enemy. Is this the criteria we want to apply the our scientific findings and the application of those findings within our society? God seems to be a very poor example for any group to follow.
I know, right? How can he dismiss the unscientific nature of Genesis? The story is just that: a story. Even Christian Biblical scholars admit Genesis is pure allegory. You can't get much less scientific than allegory. We have no reason to think the universe was poofed into existence by a magical incantation, that there was a literal Adam and Eve, or that there was a global flood (per the Noah story).
why are these atheists so mad like it says god on the thing so don’t watch it and throw a fit. he likes god bc he does. we believe in it. all of us believe in something else so calm down
@@vinayseth1114 Where do you think our technology comes. What do you think they have been running around the world and digging for. Archeology is the biggest kept secret on the planet all the country's seem to agree on the secrecy and the governing narrative they all seem to accept. Still the race is on for the best technology. The NAZIS experiments and the continuation of these works are evident. Some admitted it was from ancient artifacts. There is plenty of evidence of a cover up and fakery. I don't have to prove anything or explain, you want to believe the narrative that's ok with me. It's your opinion and I respect your beliefs.
Trying to justify faith-based belief by annexing it to technology is just plain wrong and pathetic. If your mind can't be changed by evidence, why are you a scientist? This guy is literally doing mental gymnastics (no shoes ?) just to convince himself that the bible is okay with nanotechnology. Ever hear of tower of Babel story? Or did you just ignore that because it was inconvenient. Lol
I understand why you wouldn't find his overall argument compelling, but I'm unclear on how the Tower of Babel undermines his point. The people who built the tower were attempting to prove their own greatness. Cowburn is talking about technology as a way to address challenges and help people. They're completely different.
faith based belief yet there's evidence for that belief; in fact everyday studying science only brings more evidence. the tower of babel is not the same as this clearly; would you have said the same thing for the creation/production of antibiotics-- no or any other development in science, the tower of babel was not solving anything and was not pure curiosity it was just an act of pride. science is not pride.
0:462:198:2413:1017:56 Professor in Nanotechnology at Cambridge walking without shoes and socks while selling the connection in between theology and nanotechnology... I have seen it all.
You haven't seen nothing yet. You people are stuck in the world, read your father's letter and pray for understanding before it's too late I fear that it is and that you would all partaking in the false Messiah before the real one returns. You all are full of criticism you should be slow to speak fast to listen to ever gain true knowledge being humble, this is a man of God. God is real he's more real than any of you understand he is the most natural he's more natural than you and I Jesus is Supernatural. To answer your question he was standing on Holy Ground. This man prayed that the Lord would bless his message to those that can hear, God bless.
@@americasurvival6335 All MP did was state what is happening in this video while pointing out he didn't have socks or shoes on, which I think is hilarious. MP never said anything about his beliefs, maybe don't start with "You people" and be a bit more considerate, your god would want you to. smh
I am under torment from this nano technology, the voices ( nanotechnology and the people) are in my head, they talk and talk and manipulate my emotions and are in my dreams and are controling my mind. I got myself in a little bit of legal trouble and now I have to shoot myself. They say the virtual prison exist for all of us.
to understand size I like to give the example of moving your hand 1m in 1 second to and fro. This is 1mm every millisecond. . for every mm your hand moves you sweep past 1000 red blood cells, and each blood cell is 10,000 atoms wide. By introducing the element of movement and time it gives a dynamic element that seems to allow a more visual understanding of the size. like a photon on a train.
Science is the spirit of truth. It brings the unknown to the consciences of humans. It then becomes common knowledge. What do you call common knowledge? The truth?
I like where he's going, but I feel that he should be a bit braver. Abiogenesis is completely impossible. It is not about a God of the gaps, but about reality. Scientists will be waiting for an infinity of eternities and it will not change that truth.
No, and he admits otherwise, contradicting his own ideas. His idea about how nanotechnology will show us how things go from big to small is analogous to how evolution works. As to your claim about abiogenesis, I'm sure you have proof of that, right? I'll wait ... no? We understand how proteins can form and from there once we have the right building blocks, physics now says that with those blocks and the right conditions, life is inevitable. Has it been proven yet? I'll admit not, but we've identified a path by which it could happen. Further, we _are_ here, so life *did* start somehow.
@@Shake69ification It is not possible to prove a negative. I do not care what a pagan religion believes and is this your best appeal to authority. Abiogenesis is impossible, speciation is impossible. This means we are left with atheistic scientist's opinions.
@@TheMickeymental you made a claim, a positive assertion, that evolution doesn't work and I asked for you to back up your claim. You tried to move the goalposts by talking about abiogenesis, something I didn't ask you about. Evolution is not a religion, it's fact, supported not by opinion, but by mountains of research and evidence. Modern evolutionary theory actually enjoys greater empirical support than gravitational theory. Yes, there are far more atheists in the biological sciences than any other disciplines, and that should tell you something. The more we learn, the more we are convinced by the evidence that we are the result of natural processes. Are there still gaps in our knowledge? Of course. In fact, the process of how life began is one such gap, but one which are inching ever closer to understanding. At this point I must remind you that the idea of abiogenesis is *not* part of evolutionary theory. Evolution deals _only_ with the changing of lifeforms and the introduction of new species.
I think God likes art a lot and since he created everything he more than likely likes us to play with any ideas possible. This gives the creator a little surprise here and there especially when we use our gifts to help one another or merely teach one another. Through love.
I hear you it does feel like love has no place here it's all about profit and controlling minds of sheep mass heard. That said Love is the only reason you are here. Men have highjacked ideas for certain. And we all know men hungry for power are idiots and force things. I still feel that love is the way. It's a feeling and it's a good intention. The fastest route to peace is having intentions of love and servitude to others. Yes perhaps I'm in a dream. But it's my dream. So "tread lightly because you tread on my dreams". Remember that quote from Yeats? Keep that harmony of possiblity in our hearts and technology will follow. It's all a dream anyways...😁 Lol
I think the presenter is just another religious pretender. I quoted him when he referred to nature use of Nano particles on butterfly wings. the Religious would in fact refer to God not nature.
13:10 I find really silly seeing a professor from Cambridge giving a talk without shoes and socks in a red carpet while everyone else is wearing shoes.
Honestly, it might relieve his stage fright to do something that deliberately loosens him up, going against formality and being judged on the basis of things like that. It would probably work that way for me. He may have had really sore feet. It does not bother me.
Thanks for not using a god of the gaps fallacy. As an atheist, trying to explain to people that just because I don’t know, that doesn’t mean they know, is just annoying.
Wonderful on the science thank you ,but wow when someone steps into philo/religion field of bible interpretation using a man’s words as ‘GODS´ words .O dear !!!!!!!
The most fascinating thing here is the psychology. How a logical thinker is draw to God. You can hear the different set of motivations in his voice when he talks about religion - it's the sound of irrational obsession. Lets ask him why dreadful bacteriological diseases exist which kill children in the most horrible of ways and why, when we find cures, they mutate to defeat them. What is God's thinking here exactly? I don't expect a reply.
Creepy.Stewardship over Divine Creation is not the same thing as utilitarian objectification. What about non-Christans, former Christians, who believe animals and all living beings have Souls. Penentheism, God is IN all things, and ABOVE all things, Your perspective is archaic, parochial and very dangerous to us and all living beings,
I have no problem with "the God of the gaps", an analogy may be like a car of the road, as we advance, - the road already conquered "is knowledge" - But the road to be yet to be run "its God". road does not get shorter as we advance unless we "assume" the road has an end.
Let's take every piece of evidence which can only emanate from a divine superior being and claim it does not. That does not bother me as atheists to this as a matter of course. Please do not tell me what to believe.
God doesn’t think about it, he wipes out complete People’s lineage for playing with this type of tricknology kinda like your trying to do, but he has effortlessly and never failed.
Read Genesis the first chapter of the bible it is God Himself the first and the greatest scientist and creator at work so relax read the bible and learn from Him
Everyone has ideals, some the logic is sound some not so sound. Believing is a choice. You can argue all day and for year's despite the evidence they will never agree. 1000 years from now they will think it odd the things we believe today. I wouldn't believe to strongly about anything. God's come and go and so do theories.
Psalm 49 : 10 For all can see that the wise die, that the foolish and the senseless also perish, leaving their wealth to others. 11 Their tombs will remain their houses[b] forever, their dwellings for endless generations, though they had[c] named lands after themselves. 12 People, despite their wealth, do not endure; they are like the beasts that perish. 13 This is the fate of those who trust in themselves, and of their followers, who approve their sayings.[d] 14 They are like sheep and are destined to die; death will be their shepherd (but the upright will prevail over them in the morning). Their forms will decay in the grave, far from their princely mansions. 15 But God will redeem me from the realm of the dead; he will surely take me to himself.
I would not want this man as my professor. Science is a philosophy of discovery and religion is a philosophy of ignorance. There is no place for religion in science and technology.
Sarif was right about one thing. It's in our nature to want to rise above our limits. Think about it. We were cold, so we harnessed fire. We were weak, so we invented tools. Every time we met an obstacle, we used creativity and ingenuity to overcome it. The cycle is inevitable. In the past, we've had to compensate for weaknesses, finding quick solutions that only benefit a few. But what if we never need to feel weak or morally conflicted again? What if the path Sarif wants us to take enables us to hold on to higher values with more stability? One thing is obvious. For the first time in history, we have a chance to steal fire from the gods. To turn away from it now - to stop pursing a future in which technology and biology combine, leading to the promise of a Singularity - would mean to deny the very essence of who we are. No doubt the road to get there will be bumpy, hurting some people along the way. But won't achieving the dream be worth it? We can become the gods we've always been striving to be. We might as well get good at it. - Deus Ex Human Revolution
Newton, Kepler, Galileo, etc. Affirmed their belief in God. I think it has something to do with knowing we were purposely made with a mind by our Creator. A mind. that isn’t just a by-product of an unforseen and unintended cosmic accident.
@@RolandANambo In these dark ages where you could get hang for missing a Sunday masses I would have professed my religiosity as well... +You realized this is a fallacy called 'Appeal to authority' right? Moreover, I can do the same look : "Niels Bohr, Richard Feynman, Stephen Hawking, Carl Sagan, Michio Kaku, Laurence Krauss, Richard Dawkins, etc. Affirmed their non belief in God. I think it has something to do with knowing we were not purposely made with a mind by a Creator. A mind. that is just a by-product of an unforeseen and unintended cosmic accident." Do you really find this argument/fallacy line convincing?
@@MikoDarkblade i think CS Lewis said it best “They ask me at the same time to accept a conclusion and to discredit the only testimony on which the conclusion can be based” are you putting faith on a brain that is just in one stage of its endless and aimless becoming? “Unless we can be sure that reality in the remotest nebula..obeys the thought laws of the human scientist here and now in his laboratory- in other words, unless Reason is an absolute- all is in ruins” “Theology can therefore fit science, but atheism can neither fit Theology or science.”
@@RolandANambo I'm sure you are trying to make a point here, but it's not getting through very clearly.... Even if we were to grant you a 'brain' that created the universe what would have created that brain? See? It has no power of explanation just pushes the problem outwards but never explain where that first brain would have come from.
@@MikoDarkblade What I meant to say was that those atheist scientists you mentioned make a claim that discredits the only method used to come to that conclusion. Science (according to atheist) cannot fit science. Theology can fit science. And I don’t believe God has a brain. I think God is immaterial, spaceless,timeless. If there is such a thing as a God, He must be the most excellent, powerful being, Unbound by space and time. Yes, this God must have to exist for eternity and even incomprehensible and unfathomable to an extent. Whether this God makes himself known is up to Him, I believe He has. I am a Christian. And this is how you can find great scientists with a belief in God. Not in spite of their belief, but because of their belief.
He is not telling the truth about nanotechnology. Because that's a free wisdom and energy, anyone can do it at their home. And that's a patent and where the big bucks is at.
Religion has nothing to do with science. It's a man-made concept, that is different among cultures. However, the existence of God, in general, has more than anything to do with science. We basically still know nothing about our universe, and we conclude that God doesn't exist??
Nano-Augmentation: Pipedream, or Theory for The Future? By Hugh Darrow Excerpt from a paper in NeoNature, September 2022 We've been throwing the word "nanotechnology" around for decades yet, despite only our bests effort, we are only inching closer to that molecular-scale frontier when in fact we should be racing towards it. In the decades to come, the enhanced beings -- post humans who are our progeny -- will look at the mechanical devices we rudely bolted onto our living flesh or buried inside our grey matter, and they will mock us for our crudity. They will look upon what we have made with the same curiosity, the same disinterest, as the pilot of a veetol aircraft would look upon an ox cart. The future of human augmentation lies in the small - in fact, the smallest. In the next thirty years, the molecular frontier will be broken and true nano-scalar programming and biological reorientation will be possible. There will be no tedious instances of severing limbs to replace them with steel proxies. We will drink in these tiny machines, inject them - and be transformed. - Deus Ex Human Revolution
Genesis mentions 'image' 'likeness' 'rule' 'over all earth' 'fill' & 'subdue' - & this guy reads that as indicative of nanotechnology or ANY technology!!! Boy oh boy! So he agrees that the missing links 'God of the gaps' is indefensible. Apparently is god is 'absolutely' involved with evolution - can he demonstrate he REALLY knows this as he claims? Nope otherwise God would be a known fact ALL scientists can demonstrate but none can -not even him.
he hasn't got capacity to think rationally. question to religious is, what purposes did God create living for?. if God is the laws that governed over universe without any influences, then religious might have point. but should also know that there is no judgement day or after life. laws of the universe are fixed, a dead star can resurrect in another dimension.
A fine example of logic origami... one can fold ideas like paper to represent pretty much any warm and fuzzy treasured self-delusion. He says thinking about God as existing in the gaps is wrong because as we find explanations for "stuff" God becomes smaller... he is, how would you say it? Oh yeah... right! Then he goes off the rails with a complete disconnect, and says, with no explanation or supporting evidence, that God is the cause of everything... again with no evidence or support for that contention. This is not the brightest moment for a scientist to form connections where there are none... it's just warmed over fallacious arguments from incredulity and authority... and of course the evident gullibility arising from assorted points in space and time... including that which likely comes from the 4 to 14 window... really sad.
Seems Islam is more into Nano technology than Christianity as Iran and Saudi rank high in nano technology! As an Atheist I can see China is ranked highest.
Revelation 14:9-11 [9]And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand, [10]The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb: [11]And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name.
It's better that the great personalities like Darwin,Newton, Einstein, hershel etc had passed away otherwise they would have committed suicide by hearing these words,,,,, HE Himself said we shouldn't link the gap or void to the God but finally at the end he himself linked it to the God... 😂
Scientists are good at using reason n logic. But they cant use the same reason to negate christianity bcos xtians believe in god tt killed himself to save othrs. Tt is such a weak god. We are thought to always find means to survive and be stronger rather than commit suicide. God is infinitely many times strongee and therefore are incapable of killing himself
1) How do we exist and not degrade the creation when every chemical reaction creates a net amount of entropy? 2) Your warming theory has be disproven in so many irrefutable ways that the name was amended to "climate change". There has been no net warming in the last 20 years. 3) There isn't much hope in your work if you can afford a pair of shoes.
the Creator created all You people are stuck in the world, read your father's letter and pray for understanding before it's too late I fear that it is and that you would all partaking in the false Messiah before the real one returns. You all are full of criticism you should be slow to speak fast to listen to ever gain true knowledge being humble, this is a man of God. God is real he's more real than any of you understand he is the most natural he's more natural than you and I Jesus is Supernatural. To answer your question he was standing on Holy Ground. This man prayed that the Lord would bless his message to those that can hear, God bless.
Psalm 2 Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing? 2 The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, saying, 3 Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us. 4 He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the Lord shall have them in derision. 5 Then shall he speak unto them in his wrath, and vex them in his sore displeasure. 6 Yet have I set my king upon my holy hill of Zion. 7 I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee. 8 Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession. 9 Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter's vessel. 10 Be wise now therefore, O ye kings: be instructed, ye judges of the earth. 11 Serve the LORD with fear, and rejoice with trembling. 12 Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way, when his wrath is kindled but a little. Blessed are all they that put their trust in him. Isaiah 24:21 | And it shall come to pass in that day, that the LORD shall punish the host of the high ones that are on high, and the kings of the earth upon the earth.
there are many kingdoms; for there is no space in the which there is no kingdom; and there is no kingdom in which there is no space, either a greater or a lesser kingdom. 38 And unto every kingdom is given a law; and unto every law there are certain bounds also and conditions. 39 All beings who abide not in those conditions are not justified. 40 For intelligence cleaveth unto intelligence; wisdom receiveth wisdom; truth embraceth truth; virtue loveth virtue; light cleaveth unto light; mercy hath compassion on mercy and claimeth her own; justice continueth its course and claimeth its own; judgment goeth before the face of him who sitteth upon the throne and governeth and executeth all things. 41 He comprehendeth all things, and all things are before him, and all things are round about him; and he is above all things, and in all things, and is through all things, and is round about all things; and all things are by him, and of him, even God, forever and ever. 42 And again, verily I say unto you, he hath given a law unto all things, by which they move in their times and their seasons; 43 And their courses are fixed, even the courses of the heavens and the earth, which comprehend the earth and all the planets. 44 And they give light to each other in their times and in their seasons, in their minutes, in their hours, in their days, in their weeks, in their months, in their years-all these are one year with God, but not with man. 45 The earth rolls upon her wings, and the sun giveth his light by day, and the moon giveth her light by night, and the stars also give their light, as they roll upon their wings in their glory, in the midst of the power of God. 46 Unto what shall I liken these kingdoms, that ye may understand? 47 Behold, all these are kingdoms, and any man who hath seen any or the least of these hath seen God moving in his majesty and power. 48 I say unto you, he hath seen him; nevertheless, he who came unto his own was not comprehended. 49 The light shineth in darkness, and the darkness comprehendeth it not; nevertheless, the day shall come when you shall comprehend even God, being quickened in him and by him. 50 Then shall ye know that ye have seen me, that I am, and that I am the true light that is in you, and that you are in me; otherwise ye could not abound.
does animals knows God exist?. the answer is no and that is not because they don't have capacity know but because there is no prove to God existent. if animals knows how to pass on their Gene through procreation, then won't be hard for them to know God. I'm in not mean rejecting God if he/she/it ever exist. so far there is no indication. perhaps some of us are tricking their minds into believing that God exist.
DID you notice that the Lord says "LET us CREATE Man (Woman) in OUR imange + in OUR likeness" as ELOHIM properly translated means THE TRI-UNE GODS or the HOLY TRINITY...so that ELOHIM precedes Yahweh, the singular form.
It's a bad thing. We are not meant to mess with his creation. When you change his design or modify his creation, your wrong.
RFID chip, mark of beast.
Nanotech is so wrong.
Vax has in
You are right!
Go against God and the natural creation be prepared for what is to come!
The WRATH of YHWH is coming...
👁👁👁
Nanotechnology hardware used properly ? Nanotech Medical Procedures? Most Scientists have good intentions but the Companies who own them are only interested in Money. Nanotechnology is the precursor to Transhumanism as well as being Lethal Bio Weapon of mind blowing proportions. Genomic Hacking could become an industry in itself.
@Screaming Soldier , We’re talking about DNA.
Who knows the mind of God?....he lost me when he made the remark. .."what does God think".....
This man claims to be a Christian but obviously its only a label. He has no concept of who God truly is otherwise he would have known God's thoughts are unfathonable
He said pescizely that:) We learn from Great Creator!
"But we have the mind of Christ." -- St. Paul
I’m an Architect and I can see the hand of God in creation
And I love it ❤ thank you God
GOD MADE OUR DNA SO I DOUBT HE WANTS IT CHANGED! NOT EVERYONE WHO SAYS THEY'RE CHRISTIAN ARE ACTUALLY CHRISTIANS! OBVIOUSLY!
We have everthing in our body we not need nothing , just clean water and food
Incredible the amount of Christians who condemn others and think their interpretations of the Scriptures is better than others. This man's sense of ethics should be applauded. He is conscious of always trying to do good and respectful of Creation.
John 14:6
6. Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.....
Well, the issue is who is in power over this technology?
To children of God, Trump and etc . To children of the satan , Biden and etc.
THE SATAN
Lucifer
For sure bad people that is thinking in $ money 💴
God haven’t ask for any help. He interpreted the Bible according to his convenience.
This speaker is an open-minded scientist. He senses the BIG-PICTURE of existence. So what's wrong about believing in God while you are being a scientist? As long as you do your scientific research and experiments based on realistic evidence-based facts; on the side,----you can believe anything that your intuition is suggesting to you to believe.
Brilliant and enjoyable explanation. Thank you.
“For his invisible qualities are clearly seen from the world’s creation onward, because they are perceived by the things made, even his eternal power and Godship, so that they are inexcusable.... You are worthy, Jehovah our God, to receive the glory and the honor and the power, because you created all things, and because of your will they came into existence and were created.” Romans 1:20; Revelation 4:11
One may be a carpenter, physician, author, mechanic, captain, fisherman, plumber, or even a gangster and believe in God. But NEVER EVER NEVER a scientist ~ according to the UA-cam gods of judgment & wrath almighty....
lol
Many call them selves Christians, but few know Christ. God mad man in his image, you are messing with Gods creation.
We are learning and using God's creatin as He commanded us to do, if we do it in a Godly way:)
How is a person saved being a christian..
Luke 17:33
[33]Whosoever shall seek to save his life shall lose it; and whosoever shall lose his life shall preserve it.
Todo el que procure salvar su vida, la perderá; y todo el que la pierda, la salvará.
Time stamp 17:10. Not true. We are clueless on how we went front a sterile elemental environment to life. We know what chemicals are needed but there’s no WAY it happened in a “primordial soup” scenario.
Look up James Tour. This is his field.
I'm an atheist, I think it's cool that he's religious, tbh I'm always desperate to hear a religious view from a scientist. BUT, what is that weird stuff about God telling us not to destroy the planet with nanotech? Are atheist nanotechnologists likely to destroy the planet because they haven't read the bible, so couldn't care less?
(and why is he not wearing shoes?)
Shoes? Them nanotach guys don't make a lot of cash.
I'm a christian, but I must agree with you.
I strongly doubt that atheist nanotechnologists would be any less careful than Christian ones.
In fact, based on what I know about my Christian brothers and sisters right now, I am inclined to think that we need christian scientists to learn from their athiest counterparts in order to break out of the many religious restrictions hindering their ability to learn stuff that seem scary to many of their religious leaders.
It's because there is power in the possible uses for nanotech and with power comes immense responsibility. It can be used for good or for bad. It's like the discovery of splitting an atom. It can be used to power a whole city with clean energy or it can flatten the same city to the ground and every living thing within it!
@elijaprice Balls i don't think he _meant_ to imply that atheists don't care about harming the planet. i actually think he was _trying_ to say the exact opposite. i thought it was directed toward other Christians because Christians tend _not_ to be highly concerned when it comes to environmental issues. as a Christian, it sounded like he was telling other Christians that _we_ aren't concerned _enough_ about the environment. (btw, i didn't even notice the lack of shoes.)
Has he never read the bible and all the stories about god commanding the complete destruction of other societies, commanding the slaughtering of man, woman, child and beast belonging to the enemy. Is this the criteria we want to apply the our scientific findings and the application of those findings within our society? God seems to be a very poor example for any group to follow.
Great explaination 👍
That moment when you realize he isn't wearing shoes
lol Good point. Maybe it's an Earthing pad?
wawoo i never seen it until i read ur comment,By the way do you know why he doesn't put shoes
@@zoomatazoo3520
He takes off his shoes too free his brain. Very reasonable.
This was a pretty cool talk for about 11 minutes
I know, right? How can he dismiss the unscientific nature of Genesis? The story is just that: a story. Even Christian Biblical scholars admit Genesis is pure allegory. You can't get much less scientific than allegory. We have no reason to think the universe was poofed into existence by a magical incantation, that there was a literal Adam and Eve, or that there was a global flood (per the Noah story).
Absolutely, there is an intelligent designer and He is nothing other than the Almighty God. Hallelujah! All glory to Jesus Christ👐👐👐👐👐🙏
True that . Thank u all very much
I m a muslim and I believe what he said about God is no way different what the Muslims believe.
The nanoworm- “where their worm doesn’t die”
why are these atheists so mad like it says god on the thing so don’t watch it and throw a fit. he likes god bc he does. we believe in it. all of us believe in something else so calm down
i've no doubt our ancient ancestors evidently more advanced than us in technology.
Already done it
What makes you so sure?
@@vinayseth1114
Where do you think our technology comes.
What do you think they have been running around the world and digging for.
Archeology is the biggest kept secret on the planet all the country's seem to agree on the secrecy and the governing narrative they all seem to accept.
Still the race is on for the best technology.
The NAZIS experiments and the continuation of these works are evident.
Some admitted it was from ancient artifacts.
There is plenty of evidence of a cover up and fakery.
I don't have to prove anything or explain, you want to believe the narrative that's ok with me.
It's your opinion and I respect your beliefs.
@@peterforbes4334 absolutely. Check out Marcia Ramalho's video titled "Aether"... If you didn't already. It's on youtube. Lot of proof in that movie.
Creative and useful ideas
Thanks ...👍👍👍
Dr Reiner Fuelmich Dr David Martin Dr Simone Gold Dr Kari Mullis Nuremburg II
Excellent presentation!!!!!!!!!
Trying to justify faith-based belief by annexing it to technology is just plain wrong and pathetic. If your mind can't be changed by evidence, why are you a scientist? This guy is literally doing mental gymnastics (no shoes ?) just to convince himself that the bible is okay with nanotechnology. Ever hear of tower of Babel story? Or did you just ignore that because it was inconvenient. Lol
I do agree
I understand why you wouldn't find his overall argument compelling, but I'm unclear on how the Tower of Babel undermines his point. The people who built the tower were attempting to prove their own greatness. Cowburn is talking about technology as a way to address challenges and help people. They're completely different.
faith based belief yet there's evidence for that belief; in fact everyday studying science only brings more evidence. the tower of babel is not the same as this clearly; would you have said the same thing for the creation/production of antibiotics-- no or any other development in science, the tower of babel was not solving anything and was not pure curiosity it was just an act of pride. science is not pride.
VERY GREAT
Amen thank God for this brother
Talking truths here!! God is everywhere...
Nice. I think photothermal excitation, field emissions, and quasiexcitations might be essential areas of study in this specialty.
another scientist with curiosity only in science... but -1 in philosophy... and he is not the only one...
So much insight!
0:46 2:19 8:24 13:10 17:56 Professor in Nanotechnology at Cambridge walking without shoes and socks while selling the connection in between theology and nanotechnology... I have seen it all.
You haven't seen nothing yet. You people are stuck in the world, read your father's letter and pray for understanding before it's too late I fear that it is and that you would all partaking in the false Messiah before the real one returns. You all are full of criticism you should be slow to speak fast to listen to ever gain true knowledge being humble, this is a man of God. God is real he's more real than any of you understand he is the most natural he's more natural than you and I Jesus is Supernatural. To answer your question he was standing on Holy Ground. This man prayed that the Lord would bless his message to those that can hear, God bless.
@@americasurvival6335 All MP did was state what is happening in this video while pointing out he didn't have socks or shoes on, which I think is hilarious. MP never said anything about his beliefs, maybe don't start with "You people" and be a bit more considerate, your god would want you to. smh
@14:30 relatively harmful (oops) harmeless 👀
I am under torment from this nano technology, the voices ( nanotechnology and the people) are in my head, they talk and talk and manipulate my emotions and are in my dreams and are controling my mind. I got myself in a little bit of legal trouble and now I have to shoot myself. They say the virtual prison exist for all of us.
to understand size I like to give the example of moving your hand 1m in 1 second to and fro. This is 1mm every millisecond. . for every mm your hand moves you sweep past 1000 red blood cells, and each blood cell is 10,000 atoms wide. By introducing the element of movement and time it gives a dynamic element that seems to allow a more visual understanding of the size. like a photon on a train.
That does help to picture it
Amen in Christ God Bless
Science is the spirit of truth. It brings the unknown to the consciences of humans. It then becomes common knowledge. What do you call common knowledge? The truth?
I like where he's going, but I feel that he should be a bit braver. Abiogenesis is completely impossible. It is not about a God of the gaps, but about reality. Scientists will be waiting for an infinity of eternities and it will not change that truth.
No, and he admits otherwise, contradicting his own ideas. His idea about how nanotechnology will show us how things go from big to small is analogous to how evolution works. As to your claim about abiogenesis, I'm sure you have proof of that, right? I'll wait ... no? We understand how proteins can form and from there once we have the right building blocks, physics now says that with those blocks and the right conditions, life is inevitable. Has it been proven yet? I'll admit not, but we've identified a path by which it could happen. Further, we _are_ here, so life *did* start somehow.
@@Shake69ification Evolution doesn't work.
@@TheMickeymental prove it. I mean, c'mon man, even the Vatican accepts evolution.
@@Shake69ification It is not possible to prove a negative. I do not care what a pagan religion believes and is this your best appeal to authority. Abiogenesis is impossible, speciation is impossible. This means we are left with atheistic scientist's opinions.
@@TheMickeymental you made a claim, a positive assertion, that evolution doesn't work and I asked for you to back up your claim. You tried to move the goalposts by talking about abiogenesis, something I didn't ask you about.
Evolution is not a religion, it's fact, supported not by opinion, but by mountains of research and evidence. Modern evolutionary theory actually enjoys greater empirical support than gravitational theory.
Yes, there are far more atheists in the biological sciences than any other disciplines, and that should tell you something. The more we learn, the more we are convinced by the evidence that we are the result of natural processes. Are there still gaps in our knowledge? Of course. In fact, the process of how life began is one such gap, but one which are inching ever closer to understanding. At this point I must remind you that the idea of abiogenesis is *not* part of evolutionary theory. Evolution deals _only_ with the changing of lifeforms and the introduction of new species.
I think God likes art a lot and since he created everything he more than likely likes us to play with any ideas possible. This gives the creator a little surprise here and there especially when we use our gifts to help one another or merely teach one another. Through love.
you can’t surprise God, by the way “through love”? ...who is in charge of these technologies?? ; Big tech x pharma ..i’m sorry, there’s no love
I hear you it does feel like love has no place here it's all about profit and controlling minds of sheep mass heard. That said Love is the only reason you are here. Men have highjacked ideas for certain. And we all know men hungry for power are idiots and force things.
I still feel that love is the way. It's a feeling and it's a good intention.
The fastest route to peace is having intentions of love and servitude to others.
Yes perhaps I'm in a dream.
But it's my dream. So "tread lightly because you tread on my dreams".
Remember that quote from Yeats?
Keep that harmony of possiblity in our hearts and technology will follow. It's all a dream anyways...😁
Lol
19:30
Reality-check: We still haven't got a clue.
I think the presenter is just another religious pretender. I quoted him when he referred to nature use of Nano particles on butterfly wings. the Religious would in fact refer to God not nature.
13:10 I find really silly seeing a professor from Cambridge giving a talk without shoes and socks in a red carpet while everyone else is wearing shoes.
MP He wanted to feel the softness of the red carpet.
Honestly, it might relieve his stage fright to do something that deliberately loosens him up, going against formality and being judged on the basis of things like that. It would probably work that way for me. He may have had really sore feet. It does not bother me.
we are getting closer to the structure of the universe; with nano technology.
Thanks for not using a god of the gaps fallacy. As an atheist, trying to explain to people that just because I don’t know, that doesn’t mean they know, is just annoying.
Wonderful on the science thank you ,but wow when someone steps into philo/religion field of bible interpretation using a man’s words as ‘GODS´ words .O dear !!!!!!!
i like the nanoshoes
The most fascinating thing here is the psychology. How a logical thinker is draw to God. You can hear the different set of motivations in his voice when he talks about religion - it's the sound of irrational obsession. Lets ask him why dreadful bacteriological diseases exist which kill children in the most horrible of ways and why, when we find cures, they mutate to defeat them. What is God's thinking here exactly? I don't expect a reply.
Ah …you are a Christian….
high time to turn off the video 😂😂😂
oh, why?
Creepy.Stewardship over Divine Creation is not the same thing as utilitarian objectification. What about non-Christans, former Christians, who believe animals and all living beings have Souls. Penentheism, God is IN all things, and ABOVE all things, Your perspective is archaic, parochial and very dangerous to us and all living beings,
Barefoot = grounding 🙌🏼
I have no problem with "the God of the gaps", an analogy may be like a car of the road, as we advance, - the road already conquered "is knowledge" - But the road to be yet to be run "its God". road does not get shorter as we advance unless we "assume" the road has an end.
Let's take every piece of evidence which can only emanate from a divine superior being and claim it does not. That does not bother me as atheists to this as a matter of course. Please do not tell me what to believe.
This made my day. God alone be magnified. 😍
I hate to be Captain Obvious here but, where are his shoes?
He is wearing nano shoes. You would need a microscope to see them
He is actually a fan of Tim Minchin...
@@keithr2835 Hilarious 😆
Big bang and evolution??? Christian ????
Titus 1:16
“They profess that they know God; but in works they deny him, being abominable, and disobedient, and unto every good work reprobate.”
excellent thank you
God doesn’t think about it, he wipes out complete People’s lineage for playing with this type of tricknology kinda like your trying to do, but he has effortlessly and never failed.
Read Genesis the first chapter of the bible it is God Himself the first and the greatest scientist and creator at work so relax read the bible and learn from Him
How dare you say that God did not make man with his own hands, instead of man's lie called "evolution", has knowledge made you puffed up?
Everyone has ideals, some the logic is sound some not so sound. Believing is a choice. You can argue all day and for year's despite the evidence they will never agree.
1000 years from now they will think it odd the things we believe today.
I wouldn't believe to strongly about anything.
God's come and go and so do theories.
Triggered by his nanoaggresions!
Psalm 49 :
10 For all can see that the wise die,
that the foolish and the senseless also perish,
leaving their wealth to others.
11 Their tombs will remain their houses[b] forever,
their dwellings for endless generations,
though they had[c] named lands after themselves.
12 People, despite their wealth, do not endure;
they are like the beasts that perish.
13 This is the fate of those who trust in themselves,
and of their followers, who approve their sayings.[d]
14 They are like sheep and are destined to die;
death will be their shepherd
(but the upright will prevail over them in the morning).
Their forms will decay in the grave,
far from their princely mansions.
15 But God will redeem me from the realm of the dead;
he will surely take me to himself.
Can anybody shut off NANOTECH BMI mind Kontrol ??? Please help
I would not want this man as my professor. Science is a philosophy of discovery and religion is a philosophy of ignorance. There is no place for religion in science and technology.
Why are there countless of theories that aren't yet confirmed in science but God can't be part of it? Not very scientific.
Sarif was right about one thing. It's in our nature to want to rise above our limits. Think about it. We were cold, so we harnessed fire. We were weak, so we invented tools. Every time we met an obstacle, we used creativity and ingenuity to overcome it. The cycle is inevitable. In the past, we've had to compensate for weaknesses, finding quick solutions that only benefit a few. But what if we never need to feel weak or morally conflicted again? What if the path Sarif wants us to take enables us to hold on to higher values with more stability? One thing is obvious. For the first time in history, we have a chance to steal fire from the gods. To turn away from it now - to stop pursing a future in which technology and biology combine, leading to the promise of a Singularity - would mean to deny the very essence of who we are. No doubt the road to get there will be bumpy, hurting some people along the way. But won't achieving the dream be worth it? We can become the gods we've always been striving to be. We might as well get good at it. - Deus Ex Human Revolution
I never get how otherwise decent scientist can be religious.
Newton, Kepler, Galileo, etc. Affirmed their belief in God. I think it has something to do with knowing we were purposely made with a mind by our Creator. A mind. that isn’t just a by-product of an unforseen and unintended cosmic accident.
@@RolandANambo In these dark ages where you could get hang for missing a Sunday masses I would have professed my religiosity as well... +You realized this is a fallacy called 'Appeal to authority' right?
Moreover, I can do the same look : "Niels Bohr, Richard Feynman, Stephen Hawking, Carl Sagan, Michio Kaku, Laurence Krauss, Richard Dawkins, etc. Affirmed their non belief in God. I think it has something to do with knowing we were not purposely made with a mind by a Creator. A mind. that is just a by-product of an unforeseen and unintended cosmic accident."
Do you really find this argument/fallacy line convincing?
@@MikoDarkblade i think CS Lewis said it best “They ask me at the same time to accept a conclusion and to discredit the only testimony on which the conclusion can be based” are you putting faith on a brain that is just in one stage of its endless and aimless becoming?
“Unless we can be sure that reality in the remotest nebula..obeys the thought laws of the human scientist here and now in his laboratory- in other words, unless Reason is an absolute- all is in ruins”
“Theology can therefore fit science, but atheism can neither fit Theology or science.”
@@RolandANambo I'm sure you are trying to make a point here, but it's not getting through very clearly.... Even if we were to grant you a 'brain' that created the universe what would have created that brain? See? It has no power of explanation just pushes the problem outwards but never explain where that first brain would have come from.
@@MikoDarkblade What I meant to say was that those atheist scientists you mentioned make a claim that discredits the only method used to come to that conclusion. Science (according to atheist) cannot fit science. Theology can fit science.
And I don’t believe God has a brain. I think God is immaterial, spaceless,timeless. If there is such a thing as a God, He must be the most excellent, powerful being, Unbound by space and time. Yes, this God must have to exist for eternity and even incomprehensible and unfathomable to an extent. Whether this God makes himself known is up to Him, I believe He has. I am a Christian.
And this is how you can find great scientists with a belief in God. Not in spite of their belief, but because of their belief.
See the film: *Prometheus*
Immanuel Kant had had something speak to you , but a little bit to late .
He is not telling the truth about nanotechnology. Because that's a free wisdom and energy, anyone can do it at their home. And that's a patent and where the big bucks is at.
This man destroyed this commentsection. Time for me to leave.
how can a reasonable man reconcile religion and science ? I think pride doesn't let them to admit the defeat of religion to science
A reasonable man knows that religion and science can never be in conflict because God is the author of both religion and science.
The talking in circles answer...
Religion has nothing to do with science. It's a man-made concept, that is different among cultures. However, the existence of God, in general, has more than anything to do with science. We basically still know nothing about our universe, and we conclude that God doesn't exist??
Your "god" doesn't exist, and didn't "author" anything!! Science is totally in conflict with religion!!
We need not conclude, but we see no evidence, so we ignore it. We see the universe, not any "god".
Nano-Augmentation: Pipedream, or Theory for The Future?
By Hugh Darrow
Excerpt from a paper in NeoNature, September 2022
We've been throwing the word "nanotechnology" around for decades yet, despite only our bests effort, we are only inching closer to that molecular-scale frontier when in fact we should be racing towards it. In the decades to come, the enhanced beings -- post humans who are our progeny -- will look at the mechanical devices we rudely bolted onto our living flesh or buried inside our grey matter, and they will mock us for our crudity. They will look upon what we have made with the same curiosity, the same disinterest, as the pilot of a veetol aircraft would look upon an ox cart.
The future of human augmentation lies in the small - in fact, the smallest. In the next thirty years, the molecular frontier will be broken and true nano-scalar programming and biological reorientation will be possible. There will be no tedious instances of severing limbs to replace them with steel proxies. We will drink in these tiny machines, inject them - and be transformed. - Deus Ex Human Revolution
you are n christian if you are advocating what is leading to the mark of the beast! We can be saved, healed and given life through Jesus--
Genesis mentions 'image' 'likeness' 'rule' 'over all earth' 'fill' & 'subdue' - & this guy reads that as indicative of nanotechnology or ANY technology!!! Boy oh boy! So he agrees that the missing links 'God of the gaps' is indefensible. Apparently is god is 'absolutely' involved with evolution - can he demonstrate he REALLY knows this as he claims? Nope otherwise God would be a known fact ALL scientists can demonstrate but none can -not even him.
God is the first scientist. We live in a simulation type of reality. God is the code writer. If you are an atheist, you are a fool.
You don't know any of that bullshit. Go get an education.
he hasn't got capacity to think rationally. question to religious is, what purposes did God create living for?. if God is the laws that governed over universe without any influences, then religious might have point. but should also know that there is no judgement day or after life. laws of the universe are fixed, a dead star can resurrect in another dimension.
There is no god you can know shit about.
so god is a scientist huh
A fine example of logic origami... one can fold ideas like paper to represent pretty much any warm and fuzzy treasured self-delusion. He says thinking about God as existing in the gaps is wrong because as we find explanations for "stuff" God becomes smaller... he is, how would you say it? Oh yeah... right! Then he goes off the rails with a complete disconnect, and says, with no explanation or supporting evidence, that God is the cause of everything... again with no evidence or support for that contention. This is not the brightest moment for a scientist to form connections where there are none... it's just warmed over fallacious arguments from incredulity and authority... and of course the evident gullibility arising from assorted points in space and time... including that which likely comes from the 4 to 14 window... really sad.
Amazing! Science should explain the amazing laws of God and His Creation.
I'd like to know why so many people seem to think the bible is a scientific document about how the world came about. I find that baffling.
Seems Islam is more into Nano technology than Christianity as Iran and Saudi rank high in nano technology!
As an Atheist I can see China is ranked highest.
Revelation 14:9-11
[9]And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand,
[10]The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb:
[11]And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name.
Wow, the reference to God and creation is proper crowbarred into this otherwise quite elegant presentation. Why even bother?
Er ... no, the butterfly didn't invent the colour of its wings: God did. But I'm glad you ended your speech with that correction.
Glad to hear about nanotech. The religion is goofy.
It's better that the great personalities like Darwin,Newton, Einstein, hershel etc had passed away otherwise they would have committed suicide by hearing these words,,,,, HE Himself said we shouldn't link the gap or void to the God but finally at the end he himself linked it to the God... 😂
It's a shame to see religion where it doesn't belong. Sad.
Scientists are good at using reason n logic. But they cant use the same reason to negate christianity bcos xtians believe in god tt killed himself to save othrs. Tt is such a weak god. We are thought to always find means to survive and be stronger rather than commit suicide. God is infinitely many times strongee and therefore are incapable of killing himself
1) How do we exist and not degrade the creation when every chemical reaction creates a net amount of entropy?
2) Your warming theory has be disproven in so many irrefutable ways that the name was amended to "climate change". There has been no net warming in the last 20 years.
3) There isn't much hope in your work if you can afford a pair of shoes.
Femtotechnology and attotechnology.
If the butterfly invented a nano-coating, then a butterfly is much smarter than a scientist.
the Creator created all You people are stuck in the world, read your father's letter and pray for understanding before it's too late I fear that it is and that you would all partaking in the false Messiah before the real one returns. You all are full of criticism you should be slow to speak fast to listen to ever gain true knowledge being humble, this is a man of God. God is real he's more real than any of you understand he is the most natural he's more natural than you and I Jesus is Supernatural. To answer your question he was standing on Holy Ground. This man prayed that the Lord would bless his message to those that can hear, God bless.
Psalm 2
Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing?
2 The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, saying,
3 Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us.
4 He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the Lord shall have them in derision.
5 Then shall he speak unto them in his wrath, and vex them in his sore displeasure.
6 Yet have I set my king upon my holy hill of Zion.
7 I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee.
8 Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession.
9 Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter's vessel.
10 Be wise now therefore, O ye kings: be instructed, ye judges of the earth.
11 Serve the LORD with fear, and rejoice with trembling.
12 Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way, when his wrath is kindled but a little. Blessed are all they that put their trust in him.
Isaiah 24:21 |
And it shall come to pass in that day, that the LORD shall punish the host of the high ones that are on high, and the kings of the earth upon the earth.
there are many kingdoms; for there is no space in the which there is no kingdom; and there is no kingdom in which there is no space, either a greater or a lesser kingdom.
38 And unto every kingdom is given a law; and unto every law there are certain bounds also and conditions.
39 All beings who abide not in those conditions are not justified.
40 For intelligence cleaveth unto intelligence; wisdom receiveth wisdom; truth embraceth truth; virtue loveth virtue; light cleaveth unto light; mercy hath compassion on mercy and claimeth her own; justice continueth its course and claimeth its own; judgment goeth before the face of him who sitteth upon the throne and governeth and executeth all things.
41 He comprehendeth all things, and all things are before him, and all things are round about him; and he is above all things, and in all things, and is through all things, and is round about all things; and all things are by him, and of him, even God, forever and ever.
42 And again, verily I say unto you, he hath given a law unto all things, by which they move in their times and their seasons;
43 And their courses are fixed, even the courses of the heavens and the earth, which comprehend the earth and all the planets.
44 And they give light to each other in their times and in their seasons, in their minutes, in their hours, in their days, in their weeks, in their months, in their years-all these are one year with God, but not with man.
45 The earth rolls upon her wings, and the sun giveth his light by day, and the moon giveth her light by night, and the stars also give their light, as they roll upon their wings in their glory, in the midst of the power of God.
46 Unto what shall I liken these kingdoms, that ye may understand?
47 Behold, all these are kingdoms, and any man who hath seen any or the least of these hath seen God moving in his majesty and power.
48 I say unto you, he hath seen him; nevertheless, he who came unto his own was not comprehended.
49 The light shineth in darkness, and the darkness comprehendeth it not; nevertheless, the day shall come when you shall comprehend even God, being quickened in him and by him.
50 Then shall ye know that ye have seen me, that I am, and that I am the true light that is in you, and that you are in me; otherwise ye could not abound.
Blabber, blabber, blabber blabber!!! Verily I say unto you, Bullshit!!
does animals knows God exist?. the answer is no and that is not because they don't have capacity know but because there is no prove to God existent. if animals knows how to pass on their Gene through procreation, then won't be hard for them to know God. I'm in not mean rejecting God if he/she/it ever exist. so far there is no indication. perhaps some of us are tricking their minds into believing that God exist.
Didn't ENOCh say that technology came from the watchers?. The fallen angels?. Didn't god wipe them out?
The greatest and ultimate science man is GOD.
It sounded more like a preaching session
do you hear about " Islam الأسلام " there are not any conflict
DID you notice that the Lord says "LET us CREATE Man (Woman) in OUR imange + in OUR likeness" as ELOHIM properly translated means THE TRI-UNE GODS or the HOLY TRINITY...so that ELOHIM precedes Yahweh, the singular form.