man i love your videos so much and u even encouraged me to start learning youtube and start my own channel and you inspired me to start helping people get better on UA-cam too , i hope u read this brother ... love from Los Angeles
Canon really outdone themselves with this bad boy... I mean how did they squeeze in the IS in there, AND the extra mm on the wide end!? As a Sony shooter, I am jealous of this lens.
Sony has the 16-35 F4 and 2.8 G Master versions which both have OSS (IS for Canon users) so these options already exist for Sony users. Ya the extra mm wide is nice but it’s not a deal breaker
I have the 17-28 Tamron and I'm loving it for its size, image quality and internal zoom; but I'm also jealous of the excellent glass Canon is coming out with. Hope it pushes the competition forward!
After having the built-in ND with the adapter using my 16-35 on the EOS R it would be hard to go back to threading NDs on the front of the lens again. That would be my only worry with switching to an RF lens.
Am I the only one who thinks that the 16-35 is sharper than the 15-35? Crispier punchier... that goes to the 16-35 based on what I see in those last portrait video tests :/ Look at his beard over the upper lip. look at the skin pores bellow his eye. which is sharper? Also the b-roll at 12:26'' comparing the 2 lenses. The 16-35 seems to me sharper with more contrast . I don't own any of the lenses and if I had to choose one, I would go for the IS but is it sharper? I wish I could see it like Matti
I was a bit confused when he said that as I have the 16-35 f4 IS myself. Then I thought he might only consider f/2.8 lenses or faster. But there is also the Tamron 15-30 f2.8 VC
Thank you SOOO much for doing a review on this!!! I have been scouring the internet for ANY and ALL video on it and I was waiting for someone I TRUST to show it off! Thank you SOOO MUCH!!! Now I feel much more comfortable buying it. Cheers!
When I was looking at 9:35, I thought the older lens was better. Honestly idk if it even makes a difference, just allow my camera to do more. I want to have wifi streaming connectivity, I want the sensor protector like dslrs, automatic tethering over bluetooth with my phone (toggle a fn button to automatically send images to phone/ipad/computer), built in time lapse with color editor, articulating screen on every camera (except x100), eventually make it so the mic signal can be blue toothed to camera so mics could also implement a wireless connectivity,
Matti decided from the kindness of his heart to give away his older 16 to 35 lens to Marcanthonystorm A fellow UA-camr with almost 8000 subscribers who has dedicated his off time from Trucking to producing amazing cinematic Broll videos of the trucking world. Years later Marc is at the Academy Awards receiving his first award and giving special thanks to Matti Hapooja for that 16 to 35 lens
Why would you turn off EIS? I don't understand. Whether you have IS in the lens or not.. seems like you're using the IS as justification to not use a premium feature of your camera in order to make the lens seem more worth it.. is there an actual benefit to turning EIS off? Am I missing something?
Electronic IS can be really shitty. Have you ever warp stabilized in software? Well EIS is kinda that. It can look really shitty with wobbling backgrounds etc. Also, it's better to apply EIS afterwards in soft, because if you think about it, your PC will definitely have more processing power than a chip in your camera, so probably will even do a better job. Of course if a camera can actually record it's motion data and then feed it into stabilization software then you can achieve truly great results, like that GoPro stab software, but i'm not sure that's what Canon is doing here.
I sold my 4 year old EF-S 10-18 mm two weeks ago to buy the EF-M 11-22 mm. I was happy with the 10-18, just wanted something tinier. Would you know how to enable the IS on the 11-22? It doesn't have the IS switcher that the 10-18 has on the lens. But it's supposed to be IS enabled.
i love the tamaron G2 15-30 f2.8. Its got nice IS and you can still use canon's awesome variable ND RF adapter which I like using better than front filters
I have a 15-85 Efs with built in IS and have used it for many years on my almost 200 travel films, and love it! the F stop isn’t a 2.8 but I highly recommend for the wide angle/zoom and for the price. I’m thinking about stepping up to a R6 with the 15-35 :) great video, thanks 🙏🏻
I love this lens. I was able to hand hold a 4 second long exposure of the King Arthur Carrousel at Disneyland and the stationary objects were sharp! I love it.
Excellent lens that I wish I could justify switching to. But right now, EF mount lenses work on all my cameras...versus a $2300 investment on a lens I can only use on my EOS R. Hopefully that changes in the future, but I'm good with the III without IS right now.
Hey Matti, love your content! Quick question. I use EOS-R with the 16-35 USM II lens. When I use it together with the Rode Videomicro on the camera. It captures autofocus sounds. Are RF lenses more silent like STM, or do you still capture the sound of the autofocus?
Thanks for being the first UA-camr to finally compare it with the 16-35 in terms of length with the lens adaptor! I'm curious to see how the EOS R and RF 15-35 now balances the Ronin SC? It's impossible with the 16-35 with lens adaptor.
Will admit, These kinds of movements in the video are more for gimbal tests loool. Not lens stabilization. Lens stabilization shines the most when you’re steady to begin with. Using the lens while not moving your body but only panning gently or holding it still you notice massive reduction in those tiny jitter movements as mentioned. Which helps you nail those more dialed in shots. Walking and filming with IS on and OFF is not gonna make a big difference.
Matti, are you shooting log for all your video on EOS R? I’ve been using log a lot with R and Ninja V, but not sure if it is worth the hassle over using a default (flat) profile - but still using the Ninja (that thing is awesome for a hundred reasons)! Also, are you shooting mostly 1080 or 4K?
Hold on. Now you’re saying that IBIS is weird and not what you want? You’ve previously said that all new cameras really should have ibis... You do realise that Canon have said they will he including IBIS in future cameras right? Will it be weird then? Unbelievable.
I like that you can hold the cam by the lens without the gorilla but I wasn't that impressed with the stabilisation tbh. Yes, the combined stabilisation was good but still with micro jitters. IBIS still has it imo. For vloggers who are price sensitive there are more affordable but still great camera/lens combos out there. I guess the $2k+ is going on build quality and lovely Canon L colour profile, and in your gimbal-like hands it'll serve you well 😁 Great episode, Matti, cheers.
I don't even have a 16-35, I've got a 17 - 40, which I'm happy about. I rely on this lens a lot, specifically for landscapes, but sometimes I wish I had something a bit wider and faster (because I love blue hour), and I'd love to get my hands on the RF 15-35. Thank you so much for your review, it'll be a long while before I get my hands on this lens because $$$. It still has made me excited for it. It'll probably be my first RF lens once I save enough.
Hey Matti would you recommend this lense for shooting Festivals (pictures & videos) or the RF 70-200 f2.8 only need to shoot with one lense on that day?
Thanks so much for this Matti! I really needed this. I will sell my 17-40, rf 35 135f2 (because i still have 70-200v2) for this 15-35. Great videos! So insightful!
Hi Matti, how do you think this would stack up as a stills architecture lens? I’m tempted to swap my sigma 14-24 for this as I’m shooting on the Road and don’t want to use the mount if I can avoid it???
i love your videos so much and u even encouraged me to start learning youtube and start my own channel and you inspired me to start helping people get better on UA-cam too , i hope u read this brother ... love from Los Angeles
Thumbs up great video. The eis + is together is hit and miss. Just is is the best. I've been using the RF 24-105 for vlogging with is only and it's been great.
Amazing technology - almost too perfect! One more point to add to the masses of excellent comments on this video is a subtle, but important point of English: the word 'just' is often incorrectly used as a substitute for 'only'. 'Just' either means a good verdict, or means barely, as in 'you can just see it', but does not mean 'only'. So you should use 'lens stabilization only', for example.
Hi Matti ! If using an ef lens on Full frame body, is it gonna be less light coming in the sensor ? Will it reduce the low light capacity ? Can you help me is it still good in low light if i use ef lens on the eos R for video ? Something such as sigma 18-35 1.8 ?
Hi, I ve got the eos R today. Due to budget concern, I only consider purchasing 16-35. Do you think it can perform as good as the RF 15-35 on adapter, especially for autofocus. Thanks!
The new lens looks great! Assuming everything was white balanced the same, I was a little surprised at how different the colors are on the RF vs. the EF. I liked the way color was rendered on the RF better - I thought Matti's skin tones were a little more natural looking. And I shoot with an EOS R and a 16-35mm 2.8 ii pretty regularly.
I have the RF24 70 and the stabilization is similar good :) It is a nice future for Canon users. Canon really did some magic with the new electronics in the body and the lens. This is really a Plus above competition.
For wide. I use on my Canon C100 Mark II and EOS R Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM Lens might upgrade in the future for CANON RF 15-35mm F2.8 IS Great review! Now I want this lens too, thank you!
My eye says the EF 16-35 was sharper. I did prefer the lens stabilization in the RF 15-35 best. One advantage with the EF 16-35 is you can use it with a Metabones Speed Booster in 4K mode to reduce the apparent sensor cropping issue and as a side benefit increase the lens speed by one stop.
Also the Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM. I use it for most of my fine art photographs and pro video work and that’s a great lens with IS and it cost half the price. The f4 is not a big issue considering that you are rarely under that for wide angle shots.
I love the RF lenses, I just wish they were cheaper! Also, you should make a short narrative about “character on phone in alley” that we see in all these videos. I feel like there’s a story there...
"Jittery hands sorry Matt" awesome .. I have the 16-35 F4 with adapter on Eos r it would be nice to not have the added length. but for now shooting with what I have is the best thing.
Bradley McDuffie this lens is glued to my EOS R. IS is good and I don’t miss the lost stop for videos, f2.8 is often too shallow for a nice focus on moving subject. Though... if I had the money I think I’d get it 😂
I’m a canon fan and own a lot of glass and body’s. Is it worth pulling the trigger on a EOS R for my first mirrorless camera or waiting for the next line of mirrorless??? I kinda feel the mirrorless lenses are insanely priced and would be cheaper to just switch systems.
I recently switched to Canon EOS R and I have the "old" Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM, so I have to use the adapter. I feel like, because of the adapter, the field of view was cropped a little bit. This new lens is 15mm on the shorter side, which is not a huge difference with 16mm, but together with the previously mentioned, I wonder how much difference does it actually make. Have you tested that? I'd like to know :)
The EF 16-35mm f/4L IS is a wide angle lens with stabilisation that has been available for ages. So the RF lens is the second wide-angle zoom with IS for full-frame from Canon.
So damn cool how you made a video that's not scientific but actually is so in-depth that it could be scientific. way to go and thank you for sharing - take care and be safe out there....
Really want this lens and camera. If it had 120p I would've bought it in a heartbeat. May get the 90D and try out the 120p with focus peaking with the Sigma 18-35 1.8, may learn how to manual focus better lol
Hi Matt its been great seeing your vlogging videos , i have a question to ask i am looking to get mirrorless for my vlogs should i get canon eos r or should i wait for the upgraded version of eos r which is coming around march ???
Soooo what do you think of the new wide lens? Also congrats to the Gnarbox winner!
man i love your videos so much and u even encouraged me to start learning youtube and start my own channel and you inspired me to start helping people get better on UA-cam too , i hope u read this brother ... love from Los Angeles
Matti Haapoja All Hail the King Matti. Love your videos Bro. Miss the daily Vlogs
Looks great
I'd love to test it on my EOS R .... the RF look is so awesome!
Congrats Matt (editor) on the wedding🎂
For $2,299.00 This would be my favorite lens too.
Canon really outdone themselves with this bad boy... I mean how did they squeeze in the IS in there, AND the extra mm on the wide end!?
As a Sony shooter, I am jealous of this lens.
The only thing Sony needs to catch up on and Canon is done ;-)
Sony has the 16-35 F4 and 2.8 G Master versions which both have OSS (IS for Canon users) so these options already exist for Sony users. Ya the extra mm wide is nice but it’s not a deal breaker
@@iA4R0N no, there's no Stabilization on the GM or any 2.8 version for the FE mount currently :)
Sony has the 200-600mm lens that Canon shooters extremely envy for as well
I have the 17-28 Tamron and I'm loving it for its size, image quality and internal zoom; but I'm also jealous of the excellent glass Canon is coming out with. Hope it pushes the competition forward!
so surprised that people didn't hop on and make like a whole unboxing - and review video quickly - glad matti took the time to really test it out.
Most people probably can't fork out that kind of money for that lens lol.
After having the built-in ND with the adapter using my 16-35 on the EOS R it would be hard to go back to threading NDs on the front of the lens again. That would be my only worry with switching to an RF lens.
If you order it, let’s hope you don’t get a box of rocks 😂
Am I the only one who thinks that the 16-35 is sharper than the 15-35? Crispier punchier... that goes to the 16-35 based on what I see in those last portrait video tests :/ Look at his beard over the upper lip. look at the skin pores bellow his eye. which is sharper? Also the b-roll at 12:26'' comparing the 2 lenses. The 16-35 seems to me sharper with more contrast . I don't own any of the lenses and if I had to choose one, I would go for the IS but is it sharper? I wish I could see it like Matti
Yes, I had the same thoughts and went to comments to see if it's only me. For me 16-35 was sharper.
I was feeling the same and like other commentor, I had to see if others agreed
I think he confused the lens.. because I thought the same and I look at the comments to look if some one saw the same as me 🤔🤔
"The only wide full frame image stabilized lens."
16-35 f4: Am I a joke to you?
Wich is in some ways better the the 2.8 non stabilised version.
I was a bit confused when he said that as I have the 16-35 f4 IS myself.
Then I thought he might only consider f/2.8 lenses or faster.
But there is also the Tamron 15-30 f2.8 VC
If he was using this for vlogging wouldn't have the f4 with IS have been better than the 2.8 with no IS
@@ltshinta I actually traded my 2.8 for the f4 because of the IS, the bokeh isn't that different, neither is the low light especially on an EOS R
you ever wonder during a matti b-roll sequence, what’s so important on his phone?
He is Googling if mayo is spicy or not.
@@johncook02 but I already answered that question for him on Quora...
Twitter
He talked about it in his other video that he was looking at one of Mia Khalifa's video on his phone.
Thank you SOOO much for doing a review on this!!! I have been scouring the internet for ANY and ALL video on it and I was waiting for someone I TRUST to show it off! Thank you SOOO MUCH!!! Now I feel much more comfortable buying it. Cheers!
When I was looking at 9:35, I thought the older lens was better. Honestly idk if it even makes a difference, just allow my camera to do more. I want to have wifi streaming connectivity, I want the sensor protector like dslrs, automatic tethering over bluetooth with my phone (toggle a fn button to automatically send images to phone/ipad/computer), built in time lapse with color editor, articulating screen on every camera (except x100), eventually make it so the mic signal can be blue toothed to camera so mics could also implement a wireless connectivity,
I got it and love it. What a masterpiece of a lens.
hi dad
Matti decided from the kindness of his heart to give away his older 16 to 35 lens to Marcanthonystorm A fellow UA-camr with almost 8000 subscribers who has dedicated his off time from Trucking to producing amazing cinematic Broll videos of the trucking world. Years later Marc is at the Academy Awards receiving his first award and giving special thanks to Matti Hapooja for that 16 to 35 lens
Lens stabilization was just "ok" IMO ... ES + IS was good but I wouldn't consider it a groundbreaking improvement. Especially not for $2300.
@Jay Id recommend a gimbal still!
Why would you turn off EIS? I don't understand. Whether you have IS in the lens or not.. seems like you're using the IS as justification to not use a premium feature of your camera in order to make the lens seem more worth it.. is there an actual benefit to turning EIS off? Am I missing something?
Electronic IS can be really shitty. Have you ever warp stabilized in software? Well EIS is kinda that. It can look really shitty with wobbling backgrounds etc.
Also, it's better to apply EIS afterwards in soft, because if you think about it, your PC will definitely have more processing power than a chip in your camera, so probably will even do a better job. Of course if a camera can actually record it's motion data and then feed it into stabilization software then you can achieve truly great results, like that GoPro stab software, but i'm not sure that's what Canon is doing here.
I really like the EFS 10-18 with image stabilization, it's very affordable and is great for Vlogging. It's not F 2.8, but it's also not 2.3 K!
yeah good lens that noone talks about. works great with 4k crop on the EOS R, gives you wide angle 4K with IS for dirt cheap
I sold my 4 year old EF-S 10-18 mm two weeks ago to buy the EF-M 11-22 mm. I was happy with the 10-18, just wanted something tinier. Would you know how to enable the IS on the 11-22? It doesn't have the IS switcher that the 10-18 has on the lens. But it's supposed to be IS enabled.
@@heygem it's in the settings menu under lens IS option
I like the skin look of the 16-35mm, I could see your pores, hair is so clear and the skin color is just beautiful.
i love the tamaron G2 15-30 f2.8. Its got nice IS and you can still use canon's awesome variable ND RF adapter which I like using better than front filters
the electronic stabilization in the EOS R is low key amazing. a very underrated feature imo.
I have a 15-85 Efs with built in IS and have used it for many years on my almost 200 travel films, and love it! the F stop isn’t a 2.8 but I highly recommend for the wide angle/zoom and for the price.
I’m thinking about stepping up to a R6 with the 15-35 :) great video, thanks 🙏🏻
I love this lens. I was able to hand hold a 4 second long exposure of the King Arthur Carrousel at Disneyland and the stationary objects were sharp! I love it.
Wow! Really?!
Great review/compare. Really considering getting an R + this lens
It's clear that the IS on the lens is incredibly powerful and in some cases there the difference when applying the E-IS was minimal.
Does the EOS R + RF15-35mm work with the Ronin SC? Appreciate the response, as I could not find this info anywhere!
Unfortunately it doesn't. The bottom screw and eyepiece hit the Ronin SC. It only works for me with RF 35 mm.
Excellent lens that I wish I could justify switching to. But right now, EF mount lenses work on all my cameras...versus a $2300 investment on a lens I can only use on my EOS R. Hopefully that changes in the future, but I'm good with the III without IS right now.
Hey Matti, love your content! Quick question. I use EOS-R with the 16-35 USM II lens. When I use it together with the Rode Videomicro on the camera. It captures autofocus sounds. Are RF lenses more silent like STM, or do you still capture the sound of the autofocus?
Thanks for being the first UA-camr to finally compare it with the 16-35 in terms of length with the lens adaptor! I'm curious to see how the EOS R and RF 15-35 now balances the Ronin SC? It's impossible with the 16-35 with lens adaptor.
I think I’m living the life rn, eating potato wedges hot wings and watching Mattih
Gregorio Jimenez potato jet is not happy with this.
Sandile Shongwe I HAVE SHAMED POTATO SEMPAI 😭
Congratulations to Matt's wedding !! Wishing happiness and all the good stuff marriage life brings !!
The whole thing was pretty jittery to be honest.
Will admit, These kinds of movements in the video are more for gimbal tests loool. Not lens stabilization. Lens stabilization shines the most when you’re steady to begin with. Using the lens while not moving your body but only panning gently or holding it still you notice massive reduction in those tiny jitter movements as mentioned. Which helps you nail those more dialed in shots. Walking and filming with IS on and OFF is not gonna make a big difference.
For handheld, not really, the no IS was of course.
I was waiting for this review for sooooo long. Thank you so much Matti !
So........ what are you doing with your old lens?
(Cough, I’m a new film student)
Matti, are you shooting log for all your video on EOS R? I’ve been using log a lot with R and Ninja V, but not sure if it is worth the hassle over using a default (flat) profile - but still using the Ninja (that thing is awesome for a hundred reasons)! Also, are you shooting mostly 1080 or 4K?
Sleeping on the 16-35mm f4. That is still the perfect gimbal Canon lens imo but hey wait up Matt GOT MARRIED???
Whoo! :D
Yeah Matt got married ???
can I use this lens on my canon Eos 90d?
I wish this had internal zoom like the EF version
Hold on. Now you’re saying that IBIS is weird and not what you want? You’ve previously said that all new cameras really should have ibis...
You do realise that Canon have said they will he including IBIS in future cameras right? Will it be weird then?
Unbelievable.
What's stuck up you ass Camera Contradiction?
Is this a sponsored video? Just curious since it could affect this review.
how does it work in manual focus? Are there any settings I can change to improve it? thanks sorry my english i am italian :)
This is exactly the video I was looking for! The lens IS is nice for most circumstances.
The Tamron 15-30mm 2.8 has IS
Thank you, I was not aware of that lens. Big downside though - can't use filters on it :(
@@shagral_ Plus it's super heavy (I have one)
@@shagral_ Reason I'll have to pay 1k more for the canon lens.
@@shagral_ wait why cant you use filters??
Thomas Leonczik because it has a fixed lens hood to protect protruding glass element
do u not miss the zoom?
Hey Matti, just bought the 15-35 today... thanks for a great vid... super excited to use it tomorrow on the next shoot!!!! Wooohooo!!!
Nice one. Would have been nice to see a 1080 and 4k crop comparsion. 👍
Thanks for the video test Matti. The lens is nice but the camera is a no go for me. I think canon has lost the plot.
I like that you can hold the cam by the lens without the gorilla but I wasn't that impressed with the stabilisation tbh. Yes, the combined stabilisation was good but still with micro jitters. IBIS still has it imo. For vloggers who are price sensitive there are more affordable but still great camera/lens combos out there. I guess the $2k+ is going on build quality and lovely Canon L colour profile, and in your gimbal-like hands it'll serve you well 😁 Great episode, Matti, cheers.
I don't even have a 16-35, I've got a 17 - 40, which I'm happy about. I rely on this lens a lot, specifically for landscapes, but sometimes I wish I had something a bit wider and faster (because I love blue hour), and I'd love to get my hands on the RF 15-35. Thank you so much for your review, it'll be a long while before I get my hands on this lens because $$$. It still has made me excited for it. It'll probably be my first RF lens once I save enough.
Hey Matti would you recommend this lense for shooting Festivals (pictures & videos) or the RF 70-200 f2.8 only need to shoot with one lense on that day?
YES I WAS SOOOO WAITING FOR THIS VIDEO - THANKS MATTI!!
Thanks so much for this Matti! I really needed this. I will sell my 17-40, rf 35 135f2 (because i still have 70-200v2) for this 15-35. Great videos! So insightful!
Do you record in 4K and output HD video?
I was trying to record in HD to avoid 4K crop, but cannot get sharp image like yours
Quick question
C100 or eos r for weddings/short documentary’s?
C100 for Usability, audio inputs, etc
Does the Wobble apere on a gimbal?
My issue is you have to drop ND adapter. back to Polarpro filters I guess if you want that IS. Probably worth it
I cant wait to get mine!
Hi Matti, how do you think this would stack up as a stills architecture lens? I’m tempted to swap my sigma 14-24 for this as I’m shooting on the Road and don’t want to use the mount if I can avoid it???
Kung Fu Imaging ah that’s a shame, was hoping to stay RF mount
The canon 10-18 for apsc is also image stabilised
i love your videos so much and u even encouraged me to start learning youtube and start my own channel and you inspired me to start helping people get better on UA-cam too , i hope u read this brother ... love from Los Angeles
Thumbs up great video. The eis + is together is hit and miss. Just is is the best. I've been using the RF 24-105 for vlogging with is only and it's been great.
Yoooo!! Thank you very much Matti! Super stoked about winning the gnarbox! Thanks again man!! :D
Amazing technology - almost too perfect! One more point to add to the masses of excellent comments on this video is a subtle, but important point of English: the word 'just' is often incorrectly used as a substitute for 'only'. 'Just' either means a good verdict, or means barely, as in 'you can just see it', but does not mean 'only'. So you should use 'lens stabilization only', for example.
Hi Matti ! If using an ef lens on Full frame body, is it gonna be less light coming in the sensor ? Will it reduce the low light capacity ? Can you help me is it still good in low light if i use ef lens on the eos R for video ? Something such as sigma 18-35 1.8 ?
Hi, I ve got the eos R today. Due to budget concern, I only consider purchasing 16-35. Do you think it can perform as good as the RF 15-35 on adapter, especially for autofocus. Thanks!
By which camera you are doing the video while the eos r in your hand???
This is the first RF lens that I'll be purchasing for my new EOS R5.
The new lens looks great! Assuming everything was white balanced the same, I was a little surprised at how different the colors are on the RF vs. the EF. I liked the way color was rendered on the RF better - I thought Matti's skin tones were a little more natural looking. And I shoot with an EOS R and a 16-35mm 2.8 ii pretty regularly.
which lens were you using to film the talking head portion of this video? thanks
I have the RF24 70 and the stabilization is similar good :) It is a nice future for Canon users. Canon really did some magic with the new electronics in the body and the lens. This is really a Plus above competition.
Nice review Matti! Really informational! I definitely prefer the look of just the lens stabilisation!
For wide. I use on my Canon C100 Mark II and EOS R Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM Lens
might upgrade in the future for CANON RF 15-35mm F2.8 IS Great review! Now I want this lens too, thank you!
how does this compare to the Tamron G2 lens? since both has IS and f2.8. (BUT G2 came out way before)
Love the lens, love the video!
Now I just need the lens! (Oh, and a camera to mount it to😂)
Btw congrats Matt!
My eye says the EF 16-35 was sharper. I did prefer the lens stabilization in the RF 15-35 best. One advantage with the EF 16-35 is you can use it with a Metabones Speed Booster in 4K mode to reduce the apparent sensor cropping issue and as a side benefit increase the lens speed by one stop.
Also the Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM. I use it for most of my fine art photographs and pro video work and that’s a great lens with IS and it cost half the price. The f4 is not a big issue considering that you are rarely under that for wide angle shots.
Good job. And thank you for comparing the sizes including the EF adapter!
More camera systems will use the RF mount system? How Sway?
I love the RF lenses, I just wish they were cheaper! Also, you should make a short narrative about “character on phone in alley” that we see in all these videos. I feel like there’s a story there...
Matti , what are your C-Log settings? My 15-35 seems to be yielding soft results, do you up the sharpness to 3 or 4
"Jittery hands sorry Matt" awesome .. I have the 16-35 F4 with adapter on Eos r it would be nice to not have the added length. but for now shooting with what I have is the best thing.
Bradley McDuffie this lens is glued to my EOS R. IS is good and I don’t miss the lost stop for videos, f2.8 is often too shallow for a nice focus on moving subject. Though... if I had the money I think I’d get it 😂
Hi
could you use 3 stabilization in camera,lens,Gimble?
I just got chills on my back! That lense 😋 just beautiful 😭
I’m a canon fan and own a lot of glass and body’s. Is it worth pulling the trigger on a EOS R for my first mirrorless camera or waiting for the next line of mirrorless??? I kinda feel the mirrorless lenses are insanely priced and would be cheaper to just switch systems.
I don’t own a camera but hey if it’s matti’s video, then heck yeah.
I recently switched to Canon EOS R and I have the "old" Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM, so I have to use the adapter. I feel like, because of the adapter, the field of view was cropped a little bit. This new lens is 15mm on the shorter side, which is not a huge difference with 16mm, but together with the previously mentioned, I wonder how much difference does it actually make. Have you tested that? I'd like to know :)
In the stabilization tests were you using enabled or enhanced for the camera electronic stabilization?
The EF 16-35mm f/4L IS is a wide angle lens with stabilisation that has been available for ages. So the RF lens is the second wide-angle zoom with IS for full-frame from Canon.
Great review! Really waiting for a review of the new RF 24-70 f2.8 is as i use that focal range way more when shooting events
So no mention at all about the benefit of using the older lens with the Canon variable ND EF adapter?
Can we use RF lens on Canon semi pro and pro full frame cameras that are not mirrorless?
So damn cool how you made a video that's not scientific but actually is so in-depth that it could be scientific. way to go and thank you for sharing - take care and be safe out there....
Great video thanks! Went to the description to try find the name of the mic... probably missed it?
I have the RF 24-105 F4L and the front-tube rattles around like an old pick-up truck on a dirt road. Drives me crazy...🤪
Does this RF lens rattle too?
Nice change of scenery and backdrop!!
I love this lens so far, a game changer for sure
Hi can you do the yongnuo YN 35mm f/2 S DF DSM for sony e-mount lens review
Hey Matti, how is the autofocus noise on that lens? anything noticeable?
Really want this lens and camera. If it had 120p I would've bought it in a heartbeat. May get the 90D and try out the 120p with focus peaking with the Sigma 18-35 1.8, may learn how to manual focus better lol
Hi Matt its been great seeing your vlogging videos , i have a question to ask i am looking to get mirrorless for my vlogs should i get canon eos r or should i wait for the upgraded version of eos r which is coming around march ???
That’s lens looks awesome!!! I love the focal length
this lens plus a 85 or 135mm fast lest for portrait and you are good to go.
I actually prefer the EF lens as you get to use that AWESOME ND adapter still.... Wish they would make that for EF to EF too