Lilibet! Prince WILLIAM Gave Us A CLUE…

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 січ 2024
  • Welcome to The Vintage Read Show!
    My name is Shauna and I upload 3/4 times a week, so make sure you subscribe and hit the notify bell to ensure you don't miss any.
    Every Wednesday evening we meet up for A Gossip Before Bed, in our PJs and your favourite beverage.
    Weekly there is A Snarky Snippet, in-depth book reviews, Premieres with live chat, and well-researched opinion pieces on current Royal events.
    We have a lovely, friendly community here so join in via the comments and share your thoughts,
    I look forward to reading them!
    Shauna x A lot of people never believed the Queen gave permission for Harry and Meghan to name their daughter Lilibet.
    The reality is she wouldn’t have been able to stop it even if she wanted to…
    I believe Prince William and Catherine gave us a clue at the time! I discuss that in this video.
    All of this scandal has flared up again due to the pending release of Robert Hardman’s book about King Charles III that will be released in the next few days.
    #lilibet #queenelizabeth #princeharry #meghanmarkle #roberhardman The Vintage Read Show Playlist Direct Links 🔗:
    ⭐️Literary Likes - Author Interviews • Literary Likes!
    ⭐️Beyond The Pages - The Latest News Examined • Beyond The Pages - The...
    ⭐️A Snarky Snippet - Satire • A Snarky Snippet ⭐️A Gossip Before Bed - Community • A Gossip Before Bed
    ⭐️Royal Secrets By Stephen P. Barry • Royal Secrets By Steph...
    ⭐️The Housekeeper's Diary By Wendy Berry - Book Review Series • The Housekeeper's Diar...
    ⭐️Piers Morgan Stories From The Insider - Book Chat • Piers Morgan Stories F...
    ⭐️SPARE By Prince Harry - Book Review Series • SPARE By Prince Harry ...
    ⭐️Sarah The Duchess Of York My Story Book Review Series • Sarah The Duchess Of Y...
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 3,1 тис.

  • @thevintageread
    @thevintageread  6 місяців тому +1155

    It is going to be so exciting to review Robert Hardman’s book “ The Making of a King: King Charles III and the Modern Monarchy when it is released in a few days! Make sure to join me! 😊

    • @jaimekennedy5750
      @jaimekennedy5750 6 місяців тому +68

      ABSOLUTELY! I will get it as an ebook as soon as it's available and look forward to your insights

    • @visigoth6781
      @visigoth6781 6 місяців тому +55

      With bells on!

    • @louise7552
      @louise7552 6 місяців тому +50

      I'm there ❤

    • @christinalogan311
      @christinalogan311 6 місяців тому +41

      Looking forward to it. Just found you on Twitter too. 👍

    • @DebbieHarlow
      @DebbieHarlow 6 місяців тому +43

      Won't miss it! I'm in! 👍

  • @alidabotes6264
    @alidabotes6264 6 місяців тому +779

    When Prince Philip knew his time was near said "All I want is my Lillibet". She went to him immediately & was holding his hand when he died. That made me sob!!

    • @Debbie-qx9wh
      @Debbie-qx9wh 5 місяців тому +58

      Aw your comment made me cry, how beautiful.

    • @reneewarren3525
      @reneewarren3525 5 місяців тому +46

      My heart broke 😭

    • @margarettrueman9483
      @margarettrueman9483 4 місяці тому +21

      There is NO WAY that you or anyone else out there would know that. Where did you hear that 'HERESAY"

    • @lynneburridge9082
      @lynneburridge9082 4 місяці тому +44

      Me too. This disgusting woman had no right to give that "sacred pet name" to her daughter?

    • @everynewdayisablessing8509
      @everynewdayisablessing8509 3 місяці тому +15

      Joining the crying party... your comment and the last remarks from the video did it.

  • @karenleavitt7241
    @karenleavitt7241 6 місяців тому +1238

    I never believed that she gave permission for that name!

    • @spiritofanu3112
      @spiritofanu3112 6 місяців тому +32

      me either

    • @itsmesam1967
      @itsmesam1967 6 місяців тому +37

      agree, until hearing this I always felt, as other media is claiming that QEII thought that the name Elizabeth was going to be used... not lilibet, but Shauna puts a whole new spotlight on things.

    • @Sandi-zh2wx
      @Sandi-zh2wx 6 місяців тому +38

      I never believed TWO gave birth to either child. Isn't that the real problem

    • @roriemcfadden6097
      @roriemcfadden6097 6 місяців тому +22

      ​@@itsmesam1967Even when using Elizabeth as other family members have used it as a middle name only. ❤

    • @mezzamuddle
      @mezzamuddle 6 місяців тому +30

      We all knew they were lying.

  • @arakkaramoon586
    @arakkaramoon586 6 місяців тому +1239

    "I don't own the castle's, I don't own the paintings. The only thing I have is my name". The queen's words.

    • @jorr1334
      @jorr1334 6 місяців тому +25

      I despise the grifters, but the queen was the richest woman in the world and had several private homes.

    • @cf3443
      @cf3443 6 місяців тому +62

      @@jorr1334 like the rest of us the only thing the late Queen could take with her when she passed was her name.

    • @pennylando3145
      @pennylando3145 6 місяців тому +54

      @@jorr1334 She was a wealthy woman, but far from being the richest in the world. She wasn't even in the top five. No one knows for sure what she was worth, figures cited are mostly guesstimates, but unlike the top 5, it was millions, not billions. Also, you can be incredibly wealthy on paper but not necessarily be able to liquidate every one of those assets.

    • @amystuckey5900
      @amystuckey5900 6 місяців тому +33

      Exactly! And they took that away from her!!

    • @hilaryjohns4049
      @hilaryjohns4049 6 місяців тому +35

      @@jorr1334 Yes. Also a huge private collection of jewellery, a string of race horses, a private art collection etc.etc. I am disgusted that Harry did not stop harpy using HMQ family name. I can understand how private and special that name was. For it to be used by that vile woman is beyond contempt, for Harry to allow her to do it is even worse.

  • @rosebudame
    @rosebudame 6 місяців тому +927

    For these two people who call the Royal family racist why in the word would they name their child after the head of this family. Makes no sense.

    • @BeautifullyMixed72
      @BeautifullyMixed72 5 місяців тому +10

      That's because the queen is Princess lilibet great-granddaughter..❤🎉

    • @jollyvannicen2692
      @jollyvannicen2692 5 місяців тому

      True. A total hypocrisy. If they really hated the royal family then why didn’t name their daughter after Doria instead?! Mega liar is a grifter!

    • @g.m.4877
      @g.m.4877 5 місяців тому +44

      @@BeautifullyMixed72 English isn't your first language is it?

    • @m.m.583
      @m.m.583 5 місяців тому +38

      Money is all they care about the have no respect for anyone as long as there is money to be made 🥴🥴

    • @pinchebruha405
      @pinchebruha405 5 місяців тому +31

      @@g.m.4877 well she dosent understand protocols, let alone understand what Monarchy is. World is ripe with people who want to tear down everything that others have down to their level sadly.

  • @kimomallon5862
    @kimomallon5862 6 місяців тому +1709

    A more cruel act you could not do to our beloved QEII. They are both wilfully spiteful and as our dear Queen said ‘evil’.

    • @milliway2010
      @milliway2010 6 місяців тому +109

      Harry did this to his own grandmother!!!! He's just as guilty and evil.

    • @carolethomas9808
      @carolethomas9808 6 місяців тому +47

      Willfull and spiteful?
      I have much better adjectives for them. Perhaps you do too but you wanted your comment posted, not censored.

    • @judywright4241
      @judywright4241 6 місяців тому +72

      We knew it wasn’t true, but to HEAR what she said was so poignant, ‘I don’t own my house, or the art, all I have is my name and now they’ve taken that.’
      Feels like an arrow to the heart, just like they meant it to.

    • @trishrandall5031
      @trishrandall5031 6 місяців тому +57

      @@carolethomas9808 Perhaps the best words are: Unspeakably Vile.

    • @paulawooden333
      @paulawooden333 6 місяців тому

      Your queen should know about evil what about the 10 children from Canada that never showed up to this day after her and Prince William got finished with them and they were charged with it and found guilty years later so your queen should know what evil is

  • @kathrynwandmacher3429
    @kathrynwandmacher3429 6 місяців тому +454

    Oprah is just as culpable.

    • @maggierayner9408
      @maggierayner9408 6 місяців тому +35

      She is evil.

    • @susanneprice3876
      @susanneprice3876 6 місяців тому +24

      I agree.

    • @maryfincher4814
      @maryfincher4814 3 місяці тому

      Oprah isn't culpable she's money hungry and corrupt

    • @MrCarolynCarver
      @MrCarolynCarver 3 місяці тому

      Oprah used them to her advantage. They used her to spew their lies. Oprah now understands her mistake but they don’t. They should change their daughter’s name immediately. Elizabeth would be fine.

    • @Alie-kn4te
      @Alie-kn4te 3 місяці тому +10

      Agree 💯 on Oprah

  • @qbear1045
    @qbear1045 6 місяців тому +633

    And, to add salt to the wound, they copywrited the Queen's name. They are just so vile and disgusting.

    • @elliem4225
      @elliem4225 6 місяців тому +62

      I honestly think they should have been denied the copyright.

    • @sarahreesnes8540
      @sarahreesnes8540 6 місяців тому +28

      That is just so low😞

    • @ac1045
      @ac1045 6 місяців тому +24

      Anything for a buck, those two

    • @sharonmcloughlin
      @sharonmcloughlin 5 місяців тому +21

      S copyright was done before so called kid was born

    • @laurissima22
      @laurissima22 5 місяців тому +3

      It isn't possible to copyright a name.

  • @Maureen.Silivri
    @Maureen.Silivri 5 місяців тому +381

    I think an even bigger clue is that William welcomed the ARRIVAL, rather than the birth, of Lily/Lilibet.

    • @margarettrueman9483
      @margarettrueman9483 4 місяці тому +8

      When did that happen? People are so full of stuff that they have seen on the screen

    • @user-wg3sq2uf9i
      @user-wg3sq2uf9i 4 місяці тому +10

      Prince William thought Harry wanted to call their daughter lili, which means little Diana not Lilibeth

    • @rosiehunt8491
      @rosiehunt8491 4 місяці тому +8

      @Maureen I totally agree with you. 👏👏

    • @nancydonahue2843
      @nancydonahue2843 4 місяці тому +25

      Yes arrival says it all

    • @Desertflower743
      @Desertflower743 4 місяці тому +10

      @@user-wg3sq2uf9i Lilli is short for Diana???

  • @laurenallums5235
    @laurenallums5235 6 місяців тому +847

    I was in shock when I heard their name choice after they destroyed Prince Phillip and HMTQ’s last many days. They wanted to take the monarchy down with Racist insinuations, and did it relentlessly, and then the name. This is where the hate to them was amplified to a million.

    • @lee-annbryce97
      @lee-annbryce97 6 місяців тому +62

      And also the vile bow she did in the Netflix series.. She despises the late Queen and the Royal family, pure evil they are.🇦🇺♥️

    • @Domdeone1
      @Domdeone1 6 місяців тому +38

      Disrespected in Britain due to the break with the Royals & disrepected in America due to the break with the Royals

    • @enkisdaughter4795
      @enkisdaughter4795 6 місяців тому +35

      That’s High Treason

    • @christineduffy3113
      @christineduffy3113 6 місяців тому +6

      Time this weak King did something fed up waiting forgotten about your subjects have you or couldn't care less​@@Domdeone1

    • @beareeves4923
      @beareeves4923 6 місяців тому +4

      @@christineduffy3113 This is a difficult situation. Coming out Harry and Meghan only gives them more attention and more to act the victim over.

  • @ktkclipper
    @ktkclipper 6 місяців тому +665

    After the death of Prince Philip Queen Elizabeth ASKED for her pet name to be retired. She wasn’t wishy-washy about anything, she was crystal clear. For me this is the reason I don’t believe she would have given permission for ANYONE to be named Lilibet.❤

    • @Susan-vl8ts
      @Susan-vl8ts 6 місяців тому

      Harry's a liar. A bonafide liar. Let's see if he files a lawsuit against this author. Too bad Harry - there are probably recorded phone conversations, as they probably tape/taped all of yours - and did with QE.

    • @trixmania
      @trixmania 6 місяців тому +28

      Yep, and I remember reports saying no one was to name kids after her aka first name. Says a lot. There are many vaients of names that people can use. Eliza, Beth, Lisa.....

    • @UBenHad
      @UBenHad 3 місяці тому +18

      I believe harry asked her if they could use her name ELIZABETH...THE TWO WERE REALLY ABOUT USING LILIBET,BUT THE QUEEN ASSUMED ELIZABETH,NOT LILIBET AND THAT WAS HER UNDERSTANDING ..THEY INTENTIONALLY DECIEVED THE POOR WOMAN RATHER THAN COME OUT TO ASK IF LILIBET WAS THE NAME AS ALL NAMES MUST BE APPROVED BY THE REIGNING MONARCH!

    • @sheilaclark5332
      @sheilaclark5332 2 місяці тому

      ​@@UBenHadfew

    • @user-gy7rk5pk5y
      @user-gy7rk5pk5y 2 місяці тому +1

      Its a fashionable name, we like it better than Elizabeth, no offence to our beautiful Queen Elizabeth, we love the name, what has the nameing of a child got to do with anyone, the monarchy will not survive, with all the interferences from the racist people, everyone has got to stop abusive, threatening accusations, aimed at Harry and Megan,your doing it to

  • @leeannharris-brookes9439
    @leeannharris-brookes9439 6 місяців тому +366

    Only time I every saw the Queen look lost and defeated was at Phillip’s funeral. I saw the card signed lillibet and cried for her as a woman who lost her husband of 70 years. Now most people see a name as a name but as the Queen stated she owns nothing and at the end to monetize off the queens pet name in such morning was gross

    • @amystuckey5900
      @amystuckey5900 6 місяців тому +23

      I cried so hard, so disrespectful that these two were!

    • @patti3855
      @patti3855 5 місяців тому

      Rubbish she owned billions

    • @maureenkirkman8325
      @maureenkirkman8325 2 місяці тому +3

      Money had nothing to do with "stealing" the pet name used only by the closest and dearly loved members of QE11's family. She specifically asked that that pet name not be used again. THAT is what was meant and spiteful.

    • @wesleyredford-ry3pb
      @wesleyredford-ry3pb 2 місяці тому

      THIS IS CRAZY FOR A NAME

    • @alphooey
      @alphooey 14 днів тому

      Sat there all alone.

  • @piccaninny6768
    @piccaninny6768 6 місяців тому +233

    Also they said the “arrival” of Lily not the “birth” of Lily

    • @LeeDon76
      @LeeDon76 5 місяців тому +17

      No ‘mother Megan is doing well’

    • @cgastley4398
      @cgastley4398 2 місяці тому

      I noticed that also.

    • @eileendaly4651
      @eileendaly4651 Місяць тому

      I find Harry and his wife despicable and it took the First Lady of Nigeria to call them out. I salute you - thank you for your courage.

    • @annkynaston3605
      @annkynaston3605 7 днів тому +2

      Delivered by UPS!

  • @leono7380
    @leono7380 6 місяців тому +1756

    The impertinence of these Sussexes towards the deceased Queen is unbearable.

    • @Belevaqua
      @Belevaqua 6 місяців тому +51

      Yes! THAT’S THE WORD!!!!!!!!!

    • @leandabee
      @leandabee 6 місяців тому +37

      Unbearable, perfect word 👌

    • @EvaArt-ud6gwari
      @EvaArt-ud6gwari 6 місяців тому +47

      Just plain cruel and worse, spiteful and enjoying their villainy!

    • @marybusch6182
      @marybusch6182 6 місяців тому +38

      I prefer vicious and vituperative. Duplicitous

    • @bettydoughtery3920
      @bettydoughtery3920 6 місяців тому +18

      So agree. 🇺🇸

  • @maggieswithenbank6709
    @maggieswithenbank6709 6 місяців тому +572

    I’m in agreement with what you’ve said here, Shauna! I remember the newspapers saying the Queen had declared that Lilibet would be heard no more-it was going with her dearly beloved. It broke my heart and then to hear the Sharkles announce their daughter’s name I was LIVID at their cruelty! I knew for sure the Queen had not approved it but this was the duo’s REVENGE for being told they couldn’t use the word Royal! I would have loved for the BBC to clap back at the duo’s nasty lawyers’ letter, but I’m sure the Palace told the BBC to drop it. After all, lowering yourself to be a pig like the Sharkles are and fight in the mud means you get really dirty and the pigs love it! Those Sharkles are stinking to high heaven and we all love the Monarchy MORE! I bet more will come out this year and I’m here for it. May the Queen rest in heavenly peace with her beloved! 🙏

    • @kln58cub
      @kln58cub 6 місяців тому +33

      My grandma use to say if you lay down with dogs you'll get up with flees.😂

    • @gillcawthorn7572
      @gillcawthorn7572 6 місяців тому +16

      Well said and see how ALL their words and actions are now coming back against them .
      Each worse thing they do just reminds us of all the others ,no hope for any credibility for them now.
      The Hiss of the World !

    • @ninamoores
      @ninamoores 6 місяців тому +20

      …..please don’t insult pigs….they are intelligent animals (more intelligent than the Carparkles that’s for sure) and much ,much cleaner!

    • @sethputnamsghost
      @sethputnamsghost 6 місяців тому +10

      @@kln58cubYou have a smart Grammy.👍

    • @elizabethmcloughlin1984
      @elizabethmcloughlin1984 6 місяців тому +12

      I so agree with everything you say. I'm 76 and been a republican my whole life. But, since I've watched the dirty dealings of that vile pair & the dignity of the RF, I'm now a monarchist. They've done themselves no favours. The whole world can now see how horrible and fake they are.

  • @gerigaskill785
    @gerigaskill785 5 місяців тому +249

    I think William and Catherine actually knew the name selected WAS Lilibet but they wanted to make sure that Harry and Meghan knew that they knew and that the rest of the RF would always and forever call the child Lily, NEVER Lilibet, because there was only one Lilibet, the Queen!

  • @lisalynch629
    @lisalynch629 6 місяців тому +87

    The queen represented dignity and grace that’s dying in western culture

  • @barbarajean5497
    @barbarajean5497 6 місяців тому +585

    H & M's ultimate back stab to QEII and the Royal Family ... absolutely vile. My heart breaks that QEII had to endure H & M's calculated disrespect.

    • @EvaArt-ud6gwari
      @EvaArt-ud6gwari 6 місяців тому +18

      Not disrespect, hate!

    • @bettydoughtery3920
      @bettydoughtery3920 6 місяців тому +8

      Horrible, simply horrible......
      🇺🇸

    • @ladywindrush5464
      @ladywindrush5464 6 місяців тому +4

      And Prince Andrew caused her great disappointment....

    • @BoingBB
      @BoingBB 2 місяці тому +2

      @@ladywindrush5464 Yes he did. He was her favourite son but he never stabbed her in the back.

  • @gabbyb4493
    @gabbyb4493 6 місяців тому +1340

    Harry and Meghan appropriated Archie’s name as well! That was George’s security name!

    • @louise7552
      @louise7552 6 місяців тому +22

      Seriously, nah 😮

    • @HarmonyInspired
      @HarmonyInspired 6 місяців тому +92

      "WHAAAAAAAAAAT????" I hadn't heard this one! They just keep kicking, don't they?

    • @Ceba-pw8hk
      @Ceba-pw8hk 6 місяців тому +159

      ​@louise7552 oh yes, it was public that even prince George was upset about it

    • @carlairvine7082
      @carlairvine7082 6 місяців тому +116

      Absolutely true

    • @Disco1000
      @Disco1000 6 місяців тому +67

      Omg I forgot that! 👀😳🤦🏻‍♀️

  • @1231234blake
    @1231234blake 4 місяці тому +177

    I am American and always admired Queen Elizabeth. My mouth dropped when I heard they named their daughter Lillibet and knew it was to hurt the Queen.

    • @mztwixed
      @mztwixed 2 місяці тому +4

      No I think more to use to make money down the road - tying the money making brand to that monarch and her hubby, almost guarantees sales. Take "Archwell" 🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑 point-in- case.

    • @cgastley4398
      @cgastley4398 2 місяці тому +1

      Same here.

  • @cmn6695
    @cmn6695 4 місяці тому +128

    Oh yes! It is terrible for Harry and Meghan to use the Queens childhood nickname. They are cruel and selfish.

    • @brucefields867
      @brucefields867 2 місяці тому

      Oh so terrible, shame isn't it. tisk tisk. It's a name in baby books. They could chose any name they want for the children. They did it to honour Harry's grandmother and found it endearing. People always think everything H and M do is with evil intent. Get a life and stop hating folks. Lilibet is a feminine Hebrew name meaning "God is my oath” and is derived from the Hebrew root Elisheba of the same meaning. Lilibet was most commonly used as a nickname but has become a popular first name in recent times.

    • @BoingBB
      @BoingBB 2 місяці тому

      @@brucefields867 You clearly have no understanding of what the name meant to the late Queen. It's nothing to do with any Hebrew name. It was first given to her by King George VI as a nickname because as a young child she couldn't say 'Elizabeth'. She used to say 'Lilibet'... and it stuck. I think the only people who called her that were King George, the Queen mother and maybe Princess Margaret (her sister). The Harkles MUST have known it would upset the Queen and no way did they name their child to honour her.

  • @pattipride9731
    @pattipride9731 6 місяців тому +570

    In my 65 yrs, Ive never known 2 such sickening people.

    • @susanneprice3876
      @susanneprice3876 6 місяців тому +21

      They are horrifyingly awful people

    • @hussainamina
      @hussainamina 5 місяців тому +15

      Hideously heinous. Why aren’t they in prison for their fraud?

    • @lucymorgan8859
      @lucymorgan8859 5 місяців тому +3

      Lololol...you don't know them... you only sit around and try to find reasons, and listen to what others say, to find justification to hate them... utterly rediculous... does it make you feel superior to them? Does it make you feel powerful, and in agreement with all the other haters?...You, just like the others on this page, have absolutely no right to sit in judgement of them, or anyone else, for that matter... IF, you knew them, and IF, they shared their intentions, and deepest incentives for their decisions, and IF, you were a perfect being... then, maybe... but NONE of those things are TRUE.

    • @user-lt7gi3nr4j
      @user-lt7gi3nr4j 5 місяців тому +17

      We don’t have to judge. Their behavior and actions do tell me that evil pours from them and I would not have anything to do with them. Their actions say that they care only about themselves and do not care about how many others they hurt. Oh yes! How many people have you just made a judgement about?

    • @mayhorse66
      @mayhorse66 5 місяців тому

      ​@@lucymorgan8859someone sane at last!

  • @belindabutler6294
    @belindabutler6294 6 місяців тому +1941

    Queen Elizabeth may not have had copyright on her intimate childhood name, but their choice to to use it was sheer and utter scumbaggery. To do this to someone he claimed to love was nothing short of cruel, defiant and disrespectful.

    • @angierucinski5694
      @angierucinski5694 6 місяців тому +195

      The fact they have patented the name "Lilibet" says it all. 🤢

    • @mademsoisellerhapsody
      @mademsoisellerhapsody 6 місяців тому +128

      Narcissists cannot love others

    • @gingercat2879
      @gingercat2879 6 місяців тому

      yes two weeks before she was born and harry is on video saying that he spoke to his grandmother about the name and got permission so he is a liar.@@angierucinski5694

    • @belindabutler6294
      @belindabutler6294 6 місяців тому +123

      @@angierucinski5694 nothing they do is based on authenticity or kindness.

    • @enkisdaughter4795
      @enkisdaughter4795 6 місяців тому +69

      100% correct

  • @Bonkers2013
    @Bonkers2013 6 місяців тому +56

    She gave and gave to her people.. until her last breath.. I can’t cry hard enough. 😢

  • @atunwel7607
    @atunwel7607 2 місяці тому +23

    It’s sad to know our queen had to endure that awful spiteful deceit towards the end of her long dutiful reign, over the name her dad use to call her. She did not deserve to be treated with such disrespect. 😢

  • @pinkroses8714
    @pinkroses8714 6 місяців тому +513

    I thought it could not get any crueler and disrespectful after that shocking Oprah "interview" but then the naming of the baby Lilibet put the cherry on top of the cake for me and many, many people !!!

    • @zhmw
      @zhmw 6 місяців тому +42

      And Meghan's 'curtsey' in the Netflix docu-series. That did it for me.

    • @pinkroses8714
      @pinkroses8714 6 місяців тому +37

      @@zhmw Oh yes..... why Harry sat there while she did it ..... says it all !!!

    • @AlmaWells
      @AlmaWells 6 місяців тому +30

      ​@@zhmw- That was awful !
      Prince Harry's reaction...
      should have been to get up, and walk away from the lunatic.

    • @sethputnamsghost
      @sethputnamsghost 6 місяців тому +16

      @@AlmaWellsHe is as worse as her I don’t think he really gave a damn personally.

    • @ellenrittgers990
      @ellenrittgers990 6 місяців тому +12

      Naming the maybe child Lilienthal was a very deliberate knife thrust to the queen’s heart. And I don’t doubt for a second that they both lied their way through it. And now have the temerity to act as though they’re being wronged by people’s disgust with them! For god’s sake, Charles, strip those titles!

  • @Belevaqua
    @Belevaqua 6 місяців тому +372

    It SICKENS me that Hank and Skank hurt the Queen so much after how gracious she was to them!😢

    • @georgettea7836
      @georgettea7836 6 місяців тому +11

      Hank and Skank is a nice way to refer to the professional grifters. I will use this term from now on too!

    • @user-iq3mp5zo8z
      @user-iq3mp5zo8z 6 місяців тому +13

      It's been reported that Meg thought she'd be living in Windsor castle. But our late Queen refused. IMO anything less than that would not have been seen by meg as "gracious". She was firmly put in her place by Harry's granny. So the narcissist's plans were thwarted. Cross a narcissist and they go into retaliation, "got to squash them, got to beat them " mode. Beat them by any means. Lies, spite, attempts to overshadow, etc All immature behaviour.

    • @angelsgranny
      @angelsgranny 3 місяці тому +4

      Somebody got mad at me for referring to them by the names they've earned.....
      Judas and Jezebel.
      I thought it sounded better than
      The Traitor & The Tramp
      ❤❤❤

    • @susanduncan6245
      @susanduncan6245 2 місяці тому +3

      That's the way it works. The nice you are to people the worst their behaviors become.

    • @HelloGoodby
      @HelloGoodby 2 місяці тому +3

      Meghan didn't even have the courtesy to bow and thank the Queen for giving them one of the weddings of the century. She just had a "cat ate the canary" smirk as she passed by Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip. Disrespectful.

  • @nancysayers143
    @nancysayers143 4 місяці тому +35

    I do so agree.....the stealing of that little name was atrocious, and I firmly believe that it was MM who instigated it. H was and is too wet to stop her. What a terrible thing to do to his Grandmother. I am ashamed for him.

  • @wildrose912
    @wildrose912 3 місяці тому +55

    When I heard the announcement of the Sussex baby girl name, it was as painful as a punch to my gut. I felt absolutely sickened. And the media all crowing that it was a sweet “nod” to the Queen was just heartbreaking.

  • @donnajarvis9542
    @donnajarvis9542 6 місяців тому +303

    Its all just very sad to think of the disrespect they both showed towards Queen Elizabeth II. Quite horrible.

  • @MA111-k6r
    @MA111-k6r 6 місяців тому +107

    The late Queen and her beloved husband knew the Narkle Yoko Soho was evil. They were great judges of character.

  • @elizabeth28711
    @elizabeth28711 6 місяців тому +194

    At Prince Philip's funeral, the Queen put a handwritten note on his casket (which is customary). I remember the camera zooming in on it. The note was signed "Lilibet." There were only a few people who called her by that name - it was deeply personal. I can just imagine Meghan seeing the note as she watched the funeral on TV and decided to steal the name. One can only imagine her trying to justify it: "She stole our HRH titles, we'll just steal her nickname." I've always believed Markle to be borderline. I've dealt closely with someone with BPD, and they're the most vengeful people you'll ever meet. They take revenge to a new level. I don't believe for one minute that the Queen gave her permission to use the name. It was a complete classless move.

    • @thevintageread
      @thevintageread  6 місяців тому +15

      Yes I say that in the video, it is incredibly sad.

    • @rolisonpaint3
      @rolisonpaint3 5 місяців тому +7

      I think she's a sociopath

    • @donnaschmitz5025
      @donnaschmitz5025 2 місяці тому

      I can see the smirk of satisfaction.

    • @donnaschmitz5025
      @donnaschmitz5025 2 місяці тому +1

      I can see the smirk of satisfaction.

  • @cidk59
    @cidk59 6 місяців тому +325

    A copyright takes 9 months to establish. Lilibet Diana was already copyrighted and many versions of her name established as domain names before her birth. The name was also registered on the birth certificate BEFORE they ever asked the Queen if they could name their daughter after her - basically giving the Queen no choice. The abject level of malice and forethought behind this stunt is beyond comprehension - and this, just months after the Queen’s beloved husband of 74 years had passed away. There are no words. Disgusting, disgraceful, conniving, heartless…. They just don’t cover it. 😢😢😢

    • @socialite1283
      @socialite1283 6 місяців тому +3

      Rubbish! A "copyright" is a form of intellectual property. It is established from the very moment a creative work was created - you don't need to apply for it - and has the protection of copyright law. Copyright is inherent in the creation of a creative work.

    • @lottieallen9458
      @lottieallen9458 6 місяців тому +19

      ​@socialite1283 Nothing 'creative' about taking your grandma's pet name to name your daughter. The issue isn't the act of copywriting the name per se, but what that act means in this context.
      You seem to miss the point that what H and M did was to deceive the queen, knowing full well that she would not wish her very private and personal pet name to be used in this way, not evennfor her great granddaughter. And when she specifically said it was not to be used after Prince Philip's death, that was known by all, at which time they could have picked another name, but cynically chose not to.

    • @socialite1283
      @socialite1283 6 місяців тому +1

      @@lottieallen9458 I'm not missing the point at all. I was only addressing the claim that it would take "9 months" to get something copyrighted. However, ti is not possible to copyright a personal name. They did not - they cannot - copyright a personal name.

    • @lulasmeader380
      @lulasmeader380 6 місяців тому +8

      Let them copy-write all they want! If a million people around the world decide to name their daughter Lilibet, what? they’re going to sue them all! The whole point of their actions is really moot!

    • @mayitamayas7257
      @mayitamayas7257 5 місяців тому +9

      It is already confirmed they NEVER ask permission to use the name

  • @purpurina5663
    @purpurina5663 6 місяців тому +147

    I always believed, assumed rather, that QEII was tricked into thinking they'd use Elizabeth. And I thought using Lilibet was the LOWEST of the low, just vile.
    Didn't they themselves actually say "oh yes but we'll call her Lili" once they faced backlash? Well that right there tells you they didn't have QEII's permission.

    • @chimerat8012
      @chimerat8012 6 місяців тому +13

      Your last sentence hits the nail on the head.👍👏

  • @graphiquejack
    @graphiquejack 6 місяців тому +312

    I doubt Harry even suggested Lily. He either said Elizabeth or he just said we want to name her ‘after you’ but without specifying what the name was going to be.

    • @Sage-Em
      @Sage-Em 6 місяців тому +55

      Yes! My thoughts too. I think he implied Elizabeth, and completely tricked the Queen

    • @NarelleWalker
      @NarelleWalker 6 місяців тому +27

      I wholeheartedly agree.

    • @suupkalvers2244
      @suupkalvers2244 6 місяців тому +58

      And again Harry is made free of any responsibility. Don't put the blame only on her, he was there, he could have put his foot down.
      But he didn't. So he is as much to blame for the name as she is.
      As he is to blame for the silly curtsy or whatever this couple may have done.
      Bunker Harry and his nazee uniform is a horrible creature and he has always been protected. This protection should end, the guy is almost 40!

    • @katbar6066
      @katbar6066 6 місяців тому +23

      I too heard he said they wanted to name their daughter in her honour.... she assumed it was Elizabeth.

    • @sheraleeronan2326
      @sheraleeronan2326 6 місяців тому +14

      I think he may have said Lily but not Lilybet Leading folks he was to be Lily only, then twisting it around to say I have approval to use Lilybet

  • @user-or8zu5ug4x
    @user-or8zu5ug4x 5 місяців тому +133

    A good example of blackmail, is when Harry said to his father 'Don't you want to see your grandchildren'.

    • @margarettrueman9483
      @margarettrueman9483 4 місяці тому +4

      That is NOT blackmail. I said similar to my dad when he didn't show interest in my son enough to be concerned about his welfare.

    • @gloriapaul544
      @gloriapaul544 4 місяці тому

      Were you there?

    • @margarettrueman9483
      @margarettrueman9483 4 місяці тому +1

      @@gloriapaul544 were you or have you just been watching American soaps?

    • @janeleepankovitch3139
      @janeleepankovitch3139 4 місяці тому +7

      Totally, because it was on the condition that they get security...the very definition of blackmail, you are correct.

    • @margarettrueman9483
      @margarettrueman9483 4 місяці тому +1

      @@janeleepankovitch3139 ...Harry and Megan should get security ... the British government should offer it, as they do for all Royals, especially those close to the top Royals. People are just nasty when it comes to Megan ... for one she isn't upperclass and British. Also she is a divorcee and the present royals are only where they are because a British king married a divorcee! As for the name being a problem then it is absolutely nonsense. Queen Elizabeth was never troubled about names and the like. If they had called Lilibet - "Elizabeth" it would have been totally wrong since that is the Queen's name and she was still alive. "Lilibet" was used by Margaret and why would Philip ever call the Queen "Lilibet"? However, Prince Philip was not in the Royal line and Lilibet is. Lilibet is the granddaughter of the king and as such the 7th in the line of succession! Being 7th in the line of succession is not too far away.Princess Anne is now 17th in line!

  • @JuliaannVanston-fh8dk
    @JuliaannVanston-fh8dk 6 місяців тому +35

    You can be assured if prince philip was alive he would of definitely spoken up about this

  • @sharonbennett3318
    @sharonbennett3318 6 місяців тому +102

    I believe that the queen didn’t give them the permission to used her precious name.meghan don’t care anyway cos she has no respect for anyone

    • @trishrandall5031
      @trishrandall5031 6 місяців тому +6

      Megain didn't just not care, she relished the pain she would inflict with that blow.

    • @faticus5369
      @faticus5369 2 місяці тому +1

      Spot on!

  • @JustMe-px9qy
    @JustMe-px9qy 6 місяців тому +313

    If Methane is so close to her mom…why didn’t they name the baby after Doria?
    Methane accused the queen’s family of racism and yet she wanted to name the baby after them.

    • @whatadollslife
      @whatadollslife 6 місяців тому +13

      Same with Archie ....Dorian is a wonderful name for a man

    • @LeeDon76
      @LeeDon76 6 місяців тому +7

      Apparently Doria’s real name is Doris.

    • @Belevaqua
      @Belevaqua 6 місяців тому +21

      They could have named her DORIA-DIANA! AND CALLED HER “DEE DEE!!!”

    • @susanneprice3876
      @susanneprice3876 6 місяців тому +9

      The name Doria has no significance. Doria will not be a historically remembered name.

    • @lizhorton5333
      @lizhorton5333 6 місяців тому +23

      She wanted to use the name to show there’s a royal connection so she could profit and grift off it. Everything MEgain does is for fame, status power or money.

  • @richardhuiras2402
    @richardhuiras2402 5 місяців тому +139

    Harry and Meghan should be ashamed for how they treated the Queen.
    Love the Queen.

  • @patriciagraham222
    @patriciagraham222 6 місяців тому +46

    Still a question mark over those children...it should be proven and settled once and for all..

  • @adneenmourin7359
    @adneenmourin7359 6 місяців тому +194

    The part about late Queen leaving card on Prince Philip's coffin signed Lilibet just broke my heart 😢

  • @EEmB
    @EEmB 6 місяців тому +475

    Of all the vile, evil, despicable thing they have done, stealing this very private name, was the absolute worse. It's violating.
    The Queen dedicated her whole life to others, to the public, to service. It wasn't much in the Queen's life that was only hers, truly private. Ones name means so much, it's so much of our identity in a name. By doing this Haz /Megz stole that from the Queen. The took one of her very few private and most intimate things the Queen had forever. It was so hard to hurt the Queen deeply, she was such a wise strong woman, but she has a Achilles heel...The Queen's most private identity. So they took it from the Queen. Trying to eradicate people and people's identity that's what narcissists do. The violaton on taking the name, is diabolical. Pure disgust. There are no superlatives strong enough to describe what Harry and Meghan have done. They are just horrible, vile, deeply cruel, poisonous, people. So toxic. So abusive. So evil.

    • @EvaArt-ud6gwari
      @EvaArt-ud6gwari 6 місяців тому +25

      Yes, I so agree with you. It’s hard to believe that they REALLY ARE So HORRIBLE, VILE, DEEPLY CRUEL, POISONOUS “People.” They are toxic, abusive and evil all the while hiding under their titles. It cannot be borne.

    • @EvaArt-ud6gwari
      @EvaArt-ud6gwari 6 місяців тому +19

      I forgot diabolical, because that’s how they operate. A case study for the books in every kind of narcissism from grandiose to malignant.

    • @user-xi1br6ur1q
      @user-xi1br6ur1q 6 місяців тому +12

      Some people might say, so what, it’s just a name and no one can patent a Christian name for their own personal use. But then, those sorts of people have integrity and compassion and respect for a persons wishes don’t they, virtues that these vile pretenders just don’t have.

  • @GonzoTheRosarian
    @GonzoTheRosarian 6 місяців тому +32

    The correct word for what the Queen must have felt is MORTIFIED.

  • @platosphaedo9097
    @platosphaedo9097 6 місяців тому +111

    It was reported that a main reason the lease was not renewed for the Harkles was due to Williams concern for the safety of his wife and children. The Harkles leased home was too close for comfort considering Harry’s wife’s behavior. I think it was very plausible and maybe intelligence suggesting or confirming the wise decision. Harry’s wife’s behavior has a horrid twist to it and Harry’s henpecked behavior and his past years of nastiness allows his wife’s nastiness to fester and become more bolder and unrestrained.

    • @donnaschmitz5025
      @donnaschmitz5025 2 місяці тому

      I can just see Meghan poking around, looking in windows and bugging their cars.

  • @theresagargett-lyons6173
    @theresagargett-lyons6173 6 місяців тому +260

    Amazing that Harry and Meghan are so sensitive to any criticism but so caustic and cruel to others. And then have the audacity to demand apology from their victims.

    • @sportsman4545
      @sportsman4545 6 місяців тому +21

      That's what narcissists do.

    • @EastTexasMama
      @EastTexasMama 6 місяців тому +14

      And they didn’t EVEN get criticism. Meghan got a literal paid for fairytale wedding and princess parade. Both William and Kate publicly talked about how they liked her and were fans of her show Suits. They were given a castle and a life of royalty. I can’t imagine being given so much and then having this victimhood mindset because Meghan wasn’t taught Royal protocol? Because she was expected to curtsey? They are over the top self absorbed and that heart posture is continuing to play out in America before our eyes. Early on, I thought, sure let them have their space as a couple and be more independent but my gosh they have pushed it so far and to me are the representation of the worst of the self absorbed millennial mindset that is damaging our culture and the families in them.

    • @RobinPatterson-oe9cp
      @RobinPatterson-oe9cp 6 місяців тому

      Markle sings from the same cruel playbook as Trump. They are both selfish narcissists who spin the victim narrative.

    • @elliebrown181
      @elliebrown181 6 місяців тому +6

      That is their signature - they throw the bombs but can’t take the backlash

    • @tytn9978
      @tytn9978 6 місяців тому +5

      But that is precisely what identifies Meghan as a narcissist!

  • @jaym6870
    @jaym6870 6 місяців тому +120

    I thought she said after Prince Philip died that the pet name should not be used by anyone. And that’s why H & M were cruel….they knew this yet they gaslighted her. I believe he asked her for permission to use her name without specifying which name. It was natural for her to assume he meant her proper name Elizabeth. That’s why she was livid when they insisted she had given them her blessing to use her pet name. The fact that she had said she didn’t want the name to be used anymore makes it impossible that she gave him her permission.

    • @janeconnelly3832
      @janeconnelly3832 6 місяців тому +2

      It baffles me why Charles won't take a stand against the evil rantings of Harry and Meghan, his own subjects don't want them back the people of Sussex don't want them representing them and he needs to establish without any doubt that those kids of theirs are actually genuine. It's sad when there's conflict in a family and this is a very public family adored by millions, the late Queen had so much respect and admiration throughout the world no other monarch will ever match up to her certainly not Charles. He needs to be more decisive instead of burying his head in the sand hoping it will all go away, the less connection Harry and Meghan have will the Royal family the better for all because they will then be nobodies and body wants a nobody win win for the nation.

    • @jaym6870
      @jaym6870 6 місяців тому +4

      @@janeconnelly3832 From The Art of War: 1) Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.
      2) He will win who knows when to fight and when not to fight.
      There are many other excellent quotes of wisdom from the book, and King Charles has very likely read it.

    • @RitaDimarco-xx4tx
      @RitaDimarco-xx4tx 4 місяці тому +2

      I think Charls hasn’t been well for a long time and he lost both parents in the time markle came into the family with never ending grenades thrown by the evil duo
      It’s been a tough time
      Also Charls is not weak ,he and RF have been playing the long game with dignity and by the rule book
      When the palace moves , it will be good legal moves
      H & m will not win and they will self destruct soon

  • @Klearhead
    @Klearhead 5 місяців тому +92

    I feel sorry not just for the late Queen, but also for Harry and Meghan's little girl. There will always be on record the controversy surrounding her name.

    • @ceciliacelebran658
      @ceciliacelebran658 5 місяців тому +14

      But is there really a child?

    • @annikabjornson998
      @annikabjornson998 4 місяці тому +5

      We need to avoid blaming little Betty for her parents’ misbehavior. She’s innocent of any wrongdoing. If indeed little Betty exists.

    • @user-pb8vc8vp8w
      @user-pb8vc8vp8w 4 місяці тому +7

      Her birth circumstances are questionable for all time also.Anyone seen her lately ? Her "mother" would be setting her beloved child up for endless media exposure along with her brother......anyone seen him either ?

    • @annikabjornson998
      @annikabjornson998 4 місяці тому +2

      What if she really has them but keeps them out of sight because of William’s insistence on H and TW being completely transparent about the births, just as every royal parents have had to do? I can see her doing that out of spite.

    • @Klearhead
      @Klearhead 4 місяці тому +5

      @@annikabjornson998 I think the kids are real and that Harry wants them kept out of the public eye because of what he went through as a child with the paparazzi.

  • @curiouscanuck
    @curiouscanuck 5 місяців тому +156

    Taking the Queen's name is the most cruel and unforgivable thing those two demons have done. IMO

    • @janetreynolds2510
      @janetreynolds2510 4 місяці тому +4

      They have sunk to the ultimate cruelty. I pity their poor children. No one will like them due to their parents.

    • @ecampbell5837
      @ecampbell5837 2 місяці тому +2

      Couldn’t agree more.

    • @lucyvandervort6191
      @lucyvandervort6191 2 місяці тому +1

      I couldn't agree more. That took true malice.

  • @nikolaimariaromanov8384
    @nikolaimariaromanov8384 6 місяців тому +86

    Considering that Prince Phillip was only 2 months in the grave and they had the cheek to hit the Queen with it - Not only furious - she would have been deeply hurt!

    • @RitaDimarco-xx4tx
      @RitaDimarco-xx4tx 4 місяці тому +1

      Yes , they are animals !
      No mercy for the queen who treated them good

  • @michellemcg6614
    @michellemcg6614 6 місяців тому +241

    It’s just another example of how thoughtless and cruel MM is and how spineless Harry is… That man has no backbone. It’s a shame that he couldn’t stand up for his grandmother, the Queen, after all, and put a foot down with MM. Let’s just say that these snakes never change their stripes.

    • @chrisgodfrey2742
      @chrisgodfrey2742 6 місяців тому +18

      It wasnt "thoughtless", it was Machiavelian planning

    • @lcox6468
      @lcox6468 6 місяців тому +3

      He was thinking with the wrong head, we all know that. Didn’t a friend say something about her Sparry could only say” yeh I know but she’s hot”. Shows where he is thinking only and still does now.

    • @carndt2911
      @carndt2911 6 місяців тому +3

      Spineless for sure

    • @LKMNOP
      @LKMNOP 6 місяців тому +9

      Has it ever occurred to you that Harry is totally on board with everything? Why is everyone doing woman bashing? Harry is quite capable of doing the same things that Megan is capable of doing. We have seen in the past before he met Megan that he wasn't exactly the nicest guy. Stop making it all about Megan when they're both despicable

    • @gremlin5622
      @gremlin5622 6 місяців тому +6

      Well said. H is unstable, vindictive and cruel rather than 'not exactly the nicest guy'.@@LKMNOP

  • @suejohns7530
    @suejohns7530 6 місяців тому +212

    Love your way of explaining things about how the Royals thought that the child was going to be named Lily.
    The late Queen was asked could they use her name for said child. She agreed they could use her name, but nothing was mentioned about using her family's nickname of Lilabet
    Totally agree with you that she never wanted her nickname Lilabet used after her beloved Philip died. Everyone else abided by her request but Henry didnt care about his grandmother at all. What a horrible individual he truly was.

    • @-45675dc
      @-45675dc 6 місяців тому +16

      Is! What a truly horrid person he is

    • @user-xr7mg6bh5t
      @user-xr7mg6bh5t 6 місяців тому +11

      This is what I think happend. And since the CA birth records show something like Diana Elizabeth Maria M-W on Lili's day of birth... its legally what happened. Think the Lilibet bomb was thrown at QE2 after her birth saying that's what they plan on calling her (and also registered shitload of domain names, etc. with Lili variants.) Don't care... its still abhorrent to highjack the Queens childhood and husband's nickname when it was very clear QE2 disliked MM and was not afraid of telling those in her inner circle how distasteful she found her. Wonder how Lilibet will feel about that knowledge some day.

    • @vickihandel3620
      @vickihandel3620 6 місяців тому +10

      She allegedly gave permission for them to use Elizabeth Diana! Not the nickname! QE2 was staunch about each child being given a proper Royal name! All had to get her approval not just the two losers

    • @thepeacefulmumma7055
      @thepeacefulmumma7055 6 місяців тому +1

      You’re all bloody mad! A grandson named his daughter after his grandmother! What’s wrong with that! What a nasty family they are.

    • @daphnethornton4829
      @daphnethornton4829 6 місяців тому +10

      theoeacefulmamma. The different being that it was not the Queens name but her pet nsme. Prince Philip used it in endearment to the Queen. It is like you calling your wife peaches as a pet name between you both. Then your son's wife then using it as their child's name. There is a big difference.

  • @sindydawkins2568
    @sindydawkins2568 4 місяці тому +46

    It was absolutely vile of them to use the late Queens personal nickname, Done purely out of spite and malice and to hurt our late Queen as much as they possibly could
    Not only that reason but for financial gain too
    Narcissists like that yacht trash are notorious for causing as much damage as possible

    • @donnaschmitz5025
      @donnaschmitz5025 2 місяці тому +1

      They have to think they got the last dig in. Her day is coming.

  • @tanianaldrett8637
    @tanianaldrett8637 6 місяців тому +179

    We all said it at the time. Disrespectful, cruel, utterly disgusting. I can’t even say it out loud.

  • @pamelacooney9074
    @pamelacooney9074 6 місяців тому +219

    Prince William's tweet refusing to use the stolen name speaks volumes. Very subtle, but it says everything.

    • @margarettrueman9483
      @margarettrueman9483 4 місяці тому

      How can you know that Wiliam is refusing to do anything?

  • @loveonly000
    @loveonly000 5 місяців тому +66

    Markle showcases her cruelty on the world stage every time she speaks or walks in a room

  • @ginawiggles918
    @ginawiggles918 6 місяців тому +16

    The one thing this couple excel at is treachery. May they receive a hundredfold of the same in return as their 'reward.'

  • @LilJake20
    @LilJake20 6 місяців тому +147

    It was reported she said something like "I don't own the paintings or the jewels, I only have my name... and they took that from me"
    Pretty disgusting.!

    • @mezzamuddle
      @mezzamuddle 6 місяців тому +13

      That is so sad. It made me cry for the loss of The Queen's all over again 😢

    • @Phoenix8Rising
      @Phoenix8Rising 6 місяців тому +6

      😡

    • @denisemoore6134
      @denisemoore6134 6 місяців тому +1

      It was written in a newspaper.

  • @carolbythesea
    @carolbythesea 6 місяців тому +361

    100%. Nothing could have been crueler to a dying grandmother. It doesn’t matter which one of them thought of this, they both were in it together. I believe, after Harry’s allowance from his father was reduced, Harry went to the queen for money and when she didn’t give him what he wanted, they started a campaign of revenge and deliberate hurt. It’s evil. It’s cruel. Look what they are putting both of their elderly fathers through. This is emotional abuse. UA-camr ‘Meghan’s Mole’ recently did a great video on Doria and how she happened to be at her father’s house when he had a fatal freak accident, resulting in her getting ownership of his house. I think all three of them are scary. Doria, Harry and Meghan. I hope William never allows Harry to be alone with Prince George, or the other children.

    • @roselee4445
      @roselee4445 6 місяців тому +21

      Vindictive little spongers

    • @virginiahopkins5735
      @virginiahopkins5735 6 місяців тому

      That is true, Doria disabled brother was living in house also, Doria forced him out, Missing years, She was in prison, tax fraud and trying to frame Thomas Markle far the tax fraud. Doria is pure evil, her daughter is just like her. Before it was erased, Doria and Meghan where involved in drug charges also, Meghan kicked out of university over hazing causing damage to freshman, by gluing eyes shut with super clue. Thomas her father went broke getting her out of that mess. Reason none of her family went to wedding, scaird of what they might reveal about the gruesome twosome.

    • @modeangelis7913
      @modeangelis7913 6 місяців тому +6

      I worry for Harry. He is a shit, but I do worry. I keep thinking "it's Harry", when people say 'what does she have over the King'?
      He didn't want to embarrassed him, he doesn't want to create friction, I imagine he is trying to keep him safe in a very volatile (mentally) isolated place.

    • @roselee4445
      @roselee4445 6 місяців тому

      @@modeangelis7913 he should tell the world then if Harry is wacko and Megan truths

    • @annefox6552
      @annefox6552 6 місяців тому +2

      Doris is her name..

  • @timmythecat7478
    @timmythecat7478 4 місяці тому +10

    PH naming his "daughter"? "Lilibet" is simply MM sticking yet another pin into what she believes is the outer covering of the BRF to "hurt" them. What this action actually has done is harm a much beloved grandmother and Queen and mother. The action of MM and PH is disgraceful and inexcusable on all levels.

  • @greenjewel8652
    @greenjewel8652 6 місяців тому +41

    It's unfortunate; however, no matter what people say or do or what they may take from other people, the queen led an exemplary life and had a profound impact. That speaks louder and resonates more. At the end of the day, the queen's reign and memory still rise above all of this.

  • @borisgeorge3256
    @borisgeorge3256 6 місяців тому +426

    Stealing the Queen's special and private nickname was, to me, the most gross example of gratuitous cruelty that these two have indulged themselves in. When I first heard it I literally felt sick - and sick at heart for the Queen - who can never have deserved such treatment. And I think you're spot on Shauna that William and Catherine's tweet was their way of calling out such a miserable and mean act. I suspect that M will have enjoyed the thrill of exercising such power to hurt - but she probably didn't realise that that act alone has probably sealed her fate as someone who will be forever shunned.

    • @Susan-vl8ts
      @Susan-vl8ts 6 місяців тому +26

      I was disturbed when I heard them name their daughter 'Lilibet'. What about Diana Doria? The first woman of color to be part of the RF. Guess she wasn't important enough.

    • @lorrainearmstrong7587
      @lorrainearmstrong7587 6 місяців тому

      Doria is NOT part of the royal family @@Susan-vl8ts . Sadly, she is Megsy's MOTHER and we have to put up with HER presence til she leaves!!!

    • @nancymoore1240
      @nancymoore1240 6 місяців тому +10

      That never sealed her fate. It made her more powerful bec the Queen never denied she had given permission. Some ppl still believe that they had the Queen's ok. If the Queen had denied it, this would have stopped the Harkles in their nasty tracks. Everyone would have believed the Queen, not the Harkles.
      Catherine was right. You can't leave such nasty lies just floating around undenied.
      The Harkles can't walk all over you unless you lay down before them imitating a doormat.

    • @Mydogsleepsat10pm
      @Mydogsleepsat10pm 6 місяців тому +2

      @@Susan-vl8tsDoriana is a nice blend Doriana Lily - as they have gone away from traditional royal names

    • @paulawooden333
      @paulawooden333 6 місяців тому +4

      All of these things that Harry and his wife have done not one of them have been bad enough for them to be kicked out of the family that would have been the proper thing a long time ago you let him get by with it and they just keep on doing it especially when it brings the attention that they so crave

  • @hollyfulton2636
    @hollyfulton2636 6 місяців тому +357

    I think its Embarrassing that Megan's an American

    • @chanelv5373
      @chanelv5373 6 місяців тому +40

      Agreed 👍🏽 I’m also American 🇺🇸 and I feel the same way.

    • @LindsayGillisWrites
      @LindsayGillisWrites 6 місяців тому

      People should be nicer to her!

    • @hollyfulton2636
      @hollyfulton2636 6 місяців тому +26

      well we get what we give and we all know Megan is a mean bully so...
      @@LindsayGillisWrites

    • @anncain2432
      @anncain2432 5 місяців тому +19

      I don't because all involved know the vast majority of Royal Family followers have great affection & respect for the Monarchy and we're horrified by Nutmeg's behavior and see her for the grifting opportunist both she & Harry are because of greed and a deep resentment.

    • @SaraB753
      @SaraB753 5 місяців тому +25

      I promise you many of us Americans are embarrassed by her as well.

  • @taratitat2615
    @taratitat2615 3 місяці тому +7

    That child was never acknowledged by the late QE2. That child was not even allowed to be baptized in UK, no photo with the late QE2, and never even saw the UK!😂😂😂😂

  • @carolmoon515
    @carolmoon515 4 місяці тому +8

    They wonder why people do not like them? This is so unbelievable cruel.

  • @deborahgihawi649
    @deborahgihawi649 6 місяців тому +261

    When I first heard the name, I went into shock. How on earth would I cope if a member of my family openly called their child the pet name my husband has for me. It’s vile. But then MM is vile, just vile. She’s a monster, a vile monster!

    • @michellespeight5972
      @michellespeight5972 5 місяців тому +3

      I can't see what the big deal is tbh

    • @JM-The_Curious
      @JM-The_Curious 5 місяців тому +1

      It wasn't the husband's pet name. It was a family name used when Margaret was young and couldn't properly pronounce "Elizabeth" and it came out as "Lilibet".

    • @H1X2N4
      @H1X2N4 5 місяців тому +1

      When the Queen was a little girl, she couldn’t say “Elizabeth” so “Lillibet” came out, at which point everyone started using that name . Philip used it too later on. He also called her “cabbage” but he didn’t invent the nickname Lillibet.

    • @Bluebell117
      @Bluebell117 5 місяців тому +2

      I think you don’t know the truth about the origin of her name, it was a family pet name from her childhood - and I think it’s actually rather sweet that Harry wanted to honour his granny. But honestly, we have zero proof of this child ever being born - she’s never been seen!

  • @amiek9226
    @amiek9226 6 місяців тому +102

    I remember clearly when news reports said the late Queen’s family pet name, “Lilibet,” would be laid to rest with her beloved husband. I was horrified when Harry and his ILBW announced the name of their newborn daughter. It was a deliberate act of cruelty and an assertion of narcissistic control. Imho, it’s one of the most despicable offences they’ve made against the Royal Family.

  • @elainagilbert7663
    @elainagilbert7663 6 місяців тому +19

    When William was a little boy, he fell and cried for Gary. The staff looked around confused about who Gary was. In walks, Queen Elizabeth to tell everybody that she's Gary because he can't say Granny yet. Imagine if Lili had been a boy, I bet they would've gone with Gary.

  • @tru3blu3oz
    @tru3blu3oz 6 місяців тому +164

    It is so very sad to think of HMTQ & the hurt inflicted upon her by Harry & Meg.
    It’s so hard to imagine anyone wanting to be so spiteful to a woman who throughout her entire life showed nothing but grace & for that person to be her grandson is incomprehensible.

  • @SheBendsNotBreaks
    @SheBendsNotBreaks 6 місяців тому +133

    I love that even with their super aggressive lawyers, all the legal threats disappeared when BP backed up the BBC and not the Montishitshow duo, it told us all we needed to know. Just like the fact that the litigious pair have never even threatened to sue Tom Bower, Valentine Low or Lady C for what they said in their books. You know the truth from what those two don't do.

    • @maggieswithenbank6709
      @maggieswithenbank6709 6 місяців тому +8

      You’re absolutely right! Cant sue if it’s TRUE! Which is why I’m so excited to read what Robert Hardman has written-very respected and will print the TRUTH!

    • @maggieswithenbank6709
      @maggieswithenbank6709 6 місяців тому +5

      You’re absolutely right! Cant sue if it’s TRUE! Which is why I’m so excited to read what Robert Hardman has written-very respected and will print the TRUTH!

    • @maggieswithenbank6709
      @maggieswithenbank6709 6 місяців тому +4

      You’re absolutely right! Cant sue if it’s TRUE! Which is why I’m so excited to read what Robert Hardman has written-very respected and will print the TRUTH!

    • @maggieswithenbank6709
      @maggieswithenbank6709 6 місяців тому +2

      You’re absolutely right! Cant sue if it’s TRUE! Which is why I’m so excited to read what Robert Hardman has written-very respected and will print the TRUTH!

    • @maggieswithenbank6709
      @maggieswithenbank6709 6 місяців тому +1

      You’re absolutely right! Cant sue if it’s TRUE! Which is why I’m so excited to read what Robert Hartman has written-very respected and will print the TRUTH!

  • @user-hu5vi1fc5e
    @user-hu5vi1fc5e 6 місяців тому +659

    What breaks my heart is the fact that the one who chose to call his daughter after her name, is dirtying and dishonoring everything that the queen believed in and promoted in her life... so sad and shocking...

    • @whoseturnisit9733
      @whoseturnisit9733 6 місяців тому +50

      It was the fact that she had already registered the website ‘Lillibetdiana’ even before the birth announcement showed how much of a piece of merchandise she thinks the child is.

    • @patriciagraham222
      @patriciagraham222 6 місяців тому +13

      The only dirt is sticking to the cruel pair. ...just deserts are on the way!

    • @LilyGazou
      @LilyGazou 6 місяців тому +11

      He only dirties and dishonors himself.

    • @LilyGazou
      @LilyGazou 6 місяців тому +6

      He only dirties and dishonors himself.

    • @LilyGazou
      @LilyGazou 6 місяців тому +4

      He only dirties and dishonors himself.

  • @Pretty-Pink-Mink
    @Pretty-Pink-Mink 6 місяців тому +54

    I think the horrible twosome broke the queen's heart with their actions regarding the name Lilibet. Also I believe that Lilibet does not exist and she was a surrogacy gone wrong.

    • @carolkelly2121
      @carolkelly2121 6 місяців тому +3

      The child they 'show' as Lilly is actually Hartford Schroeder who is the daughter of Stassi Schroeder. Archibald is Gavin Gringas, his mother is Brynn Gringas.

    • @bethewalt7385
      @bethewalt7385 5 місяців тому

      Look into Lady C, lady Colin- Campbell, she'll confirm the children exist, that they're Harry's, but are they Meaghan's? Big question, they seem to be certain that both were born via surrogacy therefore not born of the body of the "duchess" and that brings up issues of succession, not that either of Hank or Skanks children will EVER ascend to the throne, but there remains too many rumors, puffs of smoke, not quite extinguished fires, did Meaghan have a hysterectomy? Did Harry impregnate another woman he WAS seeing at the same time he first started dating Meaghan and is that the child called Archie? There's alot to be answered and discovered

    • @bethewalt7385
      @bethewalt7385 5 місяців тому +3

      ​@@carolkelly2121Neither of those wildly innacurate stories are true, Lillibet and Archie are Harry's children, however lillibet maybe the daughter of a woman harry was dating at the same time he started dating Meaghan, that could be why she faked the pregnancy and agreed to raise it as her own and marry harry, she did register to own the domain name lillibet more than 9 months before her "pregnancy" it's pretty much common knowledge they were both carried by women other than Meaghan but fathered by Harry, as royal inside experts assert, there is only so far in lying the palace would go to cover secrets, they'd do for Harry but not so much for Meaghan, the queen wasn't perfect but she had integrity deeply running throughout her....

    • @ginnyalan
      @ginnyalan 5 місяців тому +4

      @@bethewalt7385 royal babies must be born by the royal body, why can't anyone find the official birth certificates for them.

    • @yvonneholmes2990
      @yvonneholmes2990 5 місяців тому

      /@@bethewalt7385 Jesus love..mills and boon are alive and kicking!*

  • @myboibill
    @myboibill 6 місяців тому +38

    As smart and cagey as Queen Elizabeth was I don’t think she ever realize just how good she was at the game. The longer she’s gone the better we know she was and during her lifetime the public knew how good she was. I think William does pay attention to her And I think that Harry and his wife should tread carefully. The queen was every inch a lady and she did not complain nor explain but William score to settle in with his baby brother and his wife and he will do it in the same sophisticated way that his grandmother did. I miss the queen every day and I am not even English. How many difficult situation socially I always ask myself what would Queen Elizabeth joke and you have your answer.

    • @Dina-nm1nx
      @Dina-nm1nx 6 місяців тому +2

      William will absolutely see to it that those titles are STRIPPED!

    • @socialite1283
      @socialite1283 6 місяців тому +2

      The late Good Queen Elizabeth was more than a lady. She was every bit a majestic Queen. All ladies defer to their majestic Queen.

  • @OdeInWessex
    @OdeInWessex 6 місяців тому +308

    For me, stealing the Queens pet name after her beloved consorts death was downright sadistic. They were rubbing sneering salt into the open wound of her grief knowing full well she was powerless to stop them. I agree with the Queens assessment, Markle is evil and so is her spineless husband.

  • @micheeleforbes4734
    @micheeleforbes4734 6 місяців тому +503

    I'm in tears, 😢 how dare anyone disrespect a woman who sacrificed her life to uphold a promise she made to a nation when she was only a young adult. ❤ Harry and Meghan are dispicable human beings.

    • @judynichols2904
      @judynichols2904 6 місяців тому +17

      I blame Harry more than Meghan in this . He was her grandson , he knew her pet name was very personal to her .To lie to her to please Megszilla is a total betrayal of his grandmother . I don't know how Meghan has such a hold over him ,maybe she's blackmailing him .No matter he should have not gone along with this cruel ,evil woman !

    • @rachmunshine9474
      @rachmunshine9474 6 місяців тому +10

      @@judynichols2904 I do agree with you except that I doubt he understood anything was special ever. We probably spent more if we’ve spent a few moments, wondering what the Queen’s parents were like or at least her father, who a lot of us will not remember, having not been born yet when he died.
      Everybody mentions her parents and her husband and some even mention her cousins using her pet name in privacy. Most people don’t mention her grandparents also called her Lilibet during the time in her life where they were the York family with no heavy burden of monarchy, hanging over their heads but just a very close family of four. Close to the wider family also. This was her original family. Which Philip entered, while she was still a part of and helped her to grow their own branch. A strong one.
      The deceitful Duo suck 💩 as unroyal as that may sound. But it’s better for H then centuries past. They be calling for his head long ago already.

    • @paula1028bayer
      @paula1028bayer 6 місяців тому

      IMHO, both Harry and Meghan are spoiled rotten brats. When they don't get their way they whine and cry about it and then turn around and betray the very people who loved them the most. I have admired the queen for many years, such a wonderful person of integrity. May she rest in peace.

    • @user-qy9ov2fo2j
      @user-qy9ov2fo2j 6 місяців тому +1

      What did the queen sacrifice for others??? All I see is as American, she and her family lived a lavish lifestyle off of the poor taxpayers money

    • @socialite1283
      @socialite1283 6 місяців тому +1

      Not entirely convinced that the Late Good Queen Elizabeth saw her life being"sacrificed".

  • @kathyfugere6085
    @kathyfugere6085 6 місяців тому +42

    If Harry loved his mother so much why didn't he name her Diane Elizabeth

    • @toledojohnny6943
      @toledojohnny6943 4 місяці тому +5

      Because Meghan wanted to twist the knife.

    • @margarettrueman9483
      @margarettrueman9483 4 місяці тому

      ...because Harry was honouring his Grandma who looked after him after his mother died. If he has called his child Diane Lilibet then people would be saying that it was an insult to the Queen to put Diana first. The Queen looked after Harry for far longer than he had known his mother.

    • @ValBarber-by1sd
      @ValBarber-by1sd 4 місяці тому +4

      Wrong Margaret Trueman, it was an insult. The Queen wanted the name retired after Philip died.

  • @MS-ej9fi
    @MS-ej9fi 3 місяці тому +6

    I believe you are right on! Good for Prince William and Princess Catherine! I bet baby Lilly’s mom and dad were PISSED OFF!

  • @Nana_InCanada
    @Nana_InCanada 6 місяців тому +148

    I think you're absolutely brilliant! You find the smallest detail that says so much. I agree, very very cruel to treat our late Queen with that betrayal. But the duo are indeed cruel, they have thrown many darts, aimed to wound. I love all of your videos, you are very good at explaining the story.

  • @jackiesammarchi6390
    @jackiesammarchi6390 6 місяців тому +92

    The BIG QUESTION is ... WHERE are these
    so called Lily and Archie ? Every photo shows "Lily" same age in a blue dress and red shoes and as for Archie they make sure the focus is always on the Red hair... from the back???? Oh! Please! Who's kidding who??

    • @annirvin6555
      @annirvin6555 6 місяців тому +9

      DollsRus

    • @valbolger2461
      @valbolger2461 Місяць тому +1

      It iz believed that the real archie lives with his birth mum in UK !!!

  • @tytn9978
    @tytn9978 6 місяців тому +10

    I still cannot believe the sheer duplicity of the Montecito couple. They should count themselves fortunate that they are not living in the era of Henry the Eighth! I concur with those who are of the opinion that when Harry phoned his grandmother to seek "permission" he simply said, "We would like to use your name" and of course Her Majesty would have thought, "they want to name their daughter Elizabeth". THAT would make perfect sense. I am sure that Her Majesty's attendants would have intervened immediately had they heard that the name actually would be "Lilibet"! That deception on Harry's part was the final straw in his dwindling relationship with his grandmother.

  • @roslewis9923
    @roslewis9923 6 місяців тому +34

    Good observations. The saddest aspect of this is that Meghan registered ownership of the name before the birth of the child which is why our beloved Queen made the comment that she did not own the palaces, paintings but her pet name was the only thing that she OWNED that alludes to the added insult of them owning the domain of that name. I believe they could be got at for that! Insult to injury!

    • @JMMjamm
      @JMMjamm 6 місяців тому

      Not many people have seen screenshots of the domain purchases. Meghan (and complicit Harry) are despicable.

  • @jm162
    @jm162 6 місяців тому +100

    I totally agree with you on this Shauna. H&M were totally cruel using 'Lilibet' and it's close to the worst cruelty they displayed.

  • @mrsbluesky8415
    @mrsbluesky8415 6 місяців тому +58

    I recall H&M or someone in their camp putting out press that said even tho her name is Lillibet that they would call her Lily. The reason was to distinguish her from the Queen or some such nonsense. We all knew it wasn’t an honor but meant as a slap in the face to the Queen. There’s a lot of hate in those two.

  • @THuff808
    @THuff808 4 місяці тому +8

    The fact that Prince William referred to her as "baby" Lily and not "princess" is interesting.

  • @nevenkatadic1548
    @nevenkatadic1548 3 місяці тому +5

    Did H&M even think, for a moment, about the consecquences for their children in the future? Guess not. Pityful.

  • @mellie5899
    @mellie5899 6 місяців тому +82

    The Queen had said that her pet name was the only thing that was truly hers. She didn't really own anything else. For her grandson and his sociopathic wife to steal it was unconscionable.

  • @janscott7565
    @janscott7565 6 місяців тому +175

    Yes, Shauna, we all knew the late Queen would never have permitted it.
    As the woman endowed with the right to demand respect for what she represents as a monarch, Queen Elizabeth was brought up in an era when respect for your elders was expected, even demanded, so I can imagine the hurt by her grandson's betrayal must have been great. The Sussex's have as good as dropped their strides and bared their backsides to her then dared her to say they did it.
    I can't abide Mrs Sussex but I do despise Harry. His behaviour is beyond the pale. Just my opinion.
    Great post as ever.

    • @JuneSpreckley
      @JuneSpreckley 6 місяців тому +6

      Totally agree that Harry is always as much to blame as her. He is a cruel jealous person who because he didn’t get the main prize and didn’t get his way with the Queen set out on this destructive path to wound, hurt and damage the Monarchy. Truly despicable man

    • @JuneSpreckley
      @JuneSpreckley 6 місяців тому +5

      Totally agree that Harry is always as much to blame as her. He is a cruel jealous person who because he didn’t get the main prize and didn’t get his way with the Queen set out on this destructive path to wound, hurt and damage the Monarchy. Truly despicable man

  • @sherrydarnell7812
    @sherrydarnell7812 3 місяці тому +5

    It’s such a despicable thing for them to have done that it doesn’t even warrant comment!

  • @user-nw3xc2tk6y
    @user-nw3xc2tk6y 6 місяців тому +42

    This was probably the worst thing they have done for me, I was outraged when I heard, yes Elizabeth, Lilly, Eliza or any other name alike, but not Lillibet. I’m glad this has resurfaced again because it felt like they got away with it. Clearly M manipulated H into believing it was a good idea. I think it was embarrassing for the Queen and a difficult situation to handle. It shows no respect for the Queens boundaries or feelings. There’s no way she consented to it beforehand - properly. Yes, highly possible it could have been pitched as Lilly.

    • @cherylbristol5144
      @cherylbristol5144 6 місяців тому +2

      Why do you blame M for all things about Harry?

  • @lindaodd9681
    @lindaodd9681 6 місяців тому +245

    Some of the European Royals who were related to the Queen also referred to her as “Aunt Lilibet” and her grandfather George V - what a sorry excuse for human beings the dastardly duo are. Revolting behaviour 🤬🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🇬🇧

    • @ruthmaynard5772
      @ruthmaynard5772 6 місяців тому +8

      Queen Margrethe of Denmark called the queen Lilibet and QE11 called her Daisy.

    • @celestecv7452
      @celestecv7452 6 місяців тому +7

      Yes, I remember reading that the Danish Queen Margrethe and QEII called each other by their childhood nicknames - Lilibet and Daisy.

    • @lindaodd9681
      @lindaodd9681 6 місяців тому +8

      @@threeGalaxies222 doesn’t that just tell you everything you needed to know about our Queen? ❤️ Racist? They are definitely NOT a racist family ! 😘 love from Scotland 🇬🇧

  • @drubee7793
    @drubee7793 6 місяців тому +201

    Harry would have said to the Queen “ we are going to name her after you and her nickname will be Lili”. The Queen assumed Elizabeth with Lili for short. These are two evil people , I am so angry.

    • @kln58cub
      @kln58cub 6 місяців тому +4

      My niece was named Elizabeth for her grandmas on both her mom and dad's sides. If anyone would mess with her and call her Lizzy, she would stomp here little foot (she was 3) and say "I not her, my name is LizBit. She actually looked like a miniature Pepples from the Flinstones.

    • @mariarevell4836
      @mariarevell4836 6 місяців тому +3

      I doubt he even asked for permission..he would have worded it as ..we named her after you...too bad if you don't like it..because I didn't like you saying NO to my wife

  • @Laulie1960
    @Laulie1960 6 місяців тому +29

    When I heard they named their baby girl with the queen's nickname, I thought for sure the Queen would not have given her blessing to use her name. M & H are not just horrid, they are cruel to do this to the Queen. Thanks for the thoughts you shared. You are spot on.

    • @rosamomdmartin
      @rosamomdmartin 5 місяців тому +2

      As sad as it is what the HORRID DUO have I console my self with the knowledge that Our Beloved Queen Elizabeth is now safe in the arms of her Beloved Prince Philip and he can use her special name again. Hopefully they both can have an Angelic view of what Karma has in store for the DESPICABLE DUO. GOD BLESS THE QUEEN AND HER PRINCE FOREVER TOGETHER.❤️🙏👑👑🙏🙏❤️🇬🇧

  • @fenellavenables-hw2kx
    @fenellavenables-hw2kx 6 місяців тому +8

    A dreadful way for an innocent child to start out in life, surrounded by anger and hostile resentment. What sick parents would do that to a child. Live out revenge through their children. Its abuse. Theyre not fit to raise this child.

    • @ErinAbou
      @ErinAbou 6 місяців тому +3

      Especially with their undeniable grandparent alienation (except for her mother). Alienation from both of their families, only a grandmother but no aunts or uncles, cousins, etc. I think this is unbelievably cruel to do, not only to the other grandparents (and now deceased great-grandparents), but to their own children. 👦🏻 👧🏼

  • @flyonthewall8122
    @flyonthewall8122 6 місяців тому +158

    There IS a birth certificate registered in California that bears the name Lily Diana...born in June.
    However, the parents listed are not H & M, so there's no way of knowing whether this is an adopted child or a surrogacy.
    It has crossed my mind that H & M didn't actually name the alleged child Lilibet. They just allowed The Queen to assume that they had which, if true, is even worse in my mind.

    • @Factsmatter16
      @Factsmatter16 6 місяців тому +4

      Where did you read about that birth certificate?

    • @flyonthewall8122
      @flyonthewall8122 6 місяців тому +15

      @@Factsmatter16
      I didn't. Several UA-camrs requested the information right after her alleged birth & reported about it. It's public information, so there was no problem getting it.
      As I remember, one of those UA-camrs was Bookworm 2.

    • @zhmw
      @zhmw 6 місяців тому

      Whatever the story is about Lily Diana, it's not the story that Harry and Meghan are trying to portray to the public. They spend too much time being away from home, to be raising two young children.

    • @kathyevans2968
      @kathyevans2968 6 місяців тому

      @@flyonthewall8122that’s interesting! I’ve only heard a UA-camr who requested her birth certificate and was told there was none of that name in that day or place!

    • @trishrandall5031
      @trishrandall5031 6 місяців тому

      I searched the California Vital Records page, where every California birth since 1905is posted. There is no child with the late Queen's name, nor any child with a mother maiden name Markle. The claim the Sharkles made, published on the royal website is of that child being born on a particular day, in a particular hospital, under a particular name - none of that is true. There have also been reports of a complete lack of trash compatible with children at the Olive Garden mansion - no diapers, no packaging for toys, etc.

  • @christinalogan311
    @christinalogan311 6 місяців тому +38

    I think Prince William is really switched on to the actions of the dreadful duo. He won’t pussyfoot around with them. Great video Thankyou ✨

  • @lindaheter6350
    @lindaheter6350 6 місяців тому +6

    I agree with you that the Queen never gave her permission for the Sussex’s to use the name Lilibet! She may have given them permission to use Elizabeth, just like she has done for other members of the family.

  • @colleenluiz3678
    @colleenluiz3678 6 місяців тому +10

    I can bet that Meghan had Harry believing that it was an honor to name her that and he’s too naive to have a mature thought of his own.

    • @karinkesel5577
      @karinkesel5577 4 місяці тому +2

      Yes!! Absolutely!!!

    • @user-gy7rk5pk5y
      @user-gy7rk5pk5y 2 місяці тому +1

      Why ? What?why are people so negative ,, people are like sheep, they follow the leader, please be your own leader, think for yourself please, its getting a bit stale now

  • @christinalogan311
    @christinalogan311 6 місяців тому +162

    They no doubt used this name with the intention of causing a furore . The spiteful actions of the pair of them when they can’t get their own way are outrageous and incredibly damaging. The ghastly thug squad fans/supporters they have inflicted upon us are truly offensive & very aggressive. It’s shameful.

    • @carlairvine7082
      @carlairvine7082 6 місяців тому +16

      They are disgustingly evil

    • @christinalogan311
      @christinalogan311 6 місяців тому +23

      @@carlairvine7082 I remember Meghan having a tantrum & saying our late Queen Elizabeth didn’t “ own” the word Royal when she was forbidden using it in an inappropriate way…. That was early on.

    • @gwendolineknox784
      @gwendolineknox784 6 місяців тому +3

      I saw it reported (but do not know if it it true as it cannot be verified) that her late Majesty wrote Rachel Markle and 'daughter Betty' out of her Will. I do hope so .

  • @andreaschapman9886
    @andreaschapman9886 6 місяців тому +199

    Every day Harry/Meghan find someway to attack or upset the royal family and every day im furious that king Charles doesn't respond by stripping them of their titles and having parliament remove Harry and his supposed children from the line of succession as they are genuinely not wanted by the British people or even liked by them.

    • @Sage-Em
      @Sage-Em 6 місяців тому +29

      Have you seen the passage in this new book, where the author states that, King Charles has said the door is always open for Harry to come back........That's quite terrifying

    • @Pfrazier43
      @Pfrazier43 6 місяців тому

      @@Sage-Em I notice that the King didn't say Meghan was welcome along with Harry.
      She didn't seem to enjoy the boooos she got last time so maybe that should be How they are welcomed from here on out when they shows their face in G.B.

    • @zhmw
      @zhmw 6 місяців тому +13

      @@Sage-Em The door is always open for Harry to come back (not necessarily Meghan) and it would take Harry repenting and apologizing, just like the Prodigal Son story in the Bible, before Harry could come back. The father's door is open for his son, as Charles will always love both his sons, but that doesn't mean Harry can come back home unless he truly is sorry for all he has done to damage and hurt his family.

    • @trishrandall5031
      @trishrandall5031 6 місяців тому +19

      @@Sage-Em I would hope the only reason that door is at all open is so that if he comes back to England they shove him in the Tower and throw away the key.

    • @mariarevell4836
      @mariarevell4836 6 місяців тому +3

      ​@@Sage-Emafter 5 years of deprogramming in a Sanatorium...

  • @Bella-gj6wc
    @Bella-gj6wc 6 місяців тому +9

    These two need to go so far away GOOGLE couldn’t find them! 🤬😡

    • @jayceewriter7826
      @jayceewriter7826 6 місяців тому +1

      Amen ! The world needs this so badly I actually pray for it.