Yeah, I feel like we’re seeing less and less factual concept art of the upcoming lands, rides, etc. Some like Tropical Americas (the land overview), Cars over RoA, Monsters Inc (the land overview), and even Avengers Campus’ expansion with Avengers Infinity Defense and Stark Flight Lab. Like I see the concept art for the rides and etc, everything as a creative vision to see what they can go for and I know they can and most likely will because they have to deliver on everything regardless, im actually really excited for everything thats coming personally
You should do a video on analyzing all the parking lots currently available and debate whether or not there’s even a need to build the eastern GW before building coco or pandora. I mean toy story parking is never even close to being full . Idk about the other parking lots . Maybe there’s enough for now . This is Assuming they won’t use the bus load and unload area .
I can definitely say yes it does, especially with the goldmine of unused ideas during the Michael Eisner era. People are comparing things that were proposed decades ago to what Disney makes now (Discovery Bay and Galaxy’s Edge, Glacier Bay and Toy Story Land, WestCOT and DCA, etc.)The talent of past Imagineers is unrivaled and shows what they were truly capable of creating: fresh original risk taking ideas, not the constant play it safe mentality just because corporate believes parks like EuroDisney failed or non-IP branding cannot work with guests.
I just think Disney cannot do right for wrong sometimes, concept art is concept art....you know it may never be exact as things do change in development, people need to realise this rather than cry about it when it's not exact, even epic universe isn't "exact" in certain areas, just give Disney time to develop these attractions.
OrangeGrove55. Lads, yes the concept art and the discription of what a new land or attraction will be can hurt fan reception. Here's this an early discription of an attraction to come to Disneyland. From Spring 1978, under the heading, Big Thunder Strkes! "A legend is about to come to life.....Big Thunder Mountain Railroad... roaring its way round Frontierland. The trains will climb to the top of Big Thunder Butte, rest for a few seconds to enjoy the view. Then your train will race you deep down into the long forgotten mines. A deafening avalanche threatens to collapse the mine walls to seal the remaining exit! But in the nick of time, as you are surounded by smoke your train escapes.... back to the safety of Thunder Ridge Depot." Now I might be wrong but I don't think we ever got all that but we ended up with some of it. We did'nt get an attack of flying screeching bats for instance. That's why sometimes a new attraction can be so naff, it's not what we were told it would be. Cheers, Chris Perry.
Yes! Their concept art is continually leading to unrealistic expectations! They need to dumb it down a bit or start delivering better! 👍🏼
Yeah, I feel like we’re seeing less and less factual concept art of the upcoming lands, rides, etc. Some like Tropical Americas (the land overview), Cars over RoA, Monsters Inc (the land overview), and even Avengers Campus’ expansion with Avengers Infinity Defense and Stark Flight Lab. Like I see the concept art for the rides and etc, everything as a creative vision to see what they can go for and I know they can and most likely will because they have to deliver on everything regardless, im actually really excited for everything thats coming personally
Like I know we should get some factual concept art for Destination D23 this year idk for what, but we’ll find out
Overall I agree 100% like begin construction, show concept art after. Thats what I like about Universal, I would love for Disney to do the same thing
I think it's safer for Disney to promise less and overdeliver than to promise too much and then underdeliver.
You should do a video on analyzing all the parking lots currently available and debate whether or not there’s even a need to build the eastern GW before building coco or pandora. I mean toy story parking is never even close to being full . Idk about the other parking lots . Maybe there’s enough for now . This is Assuming they won’t use the bus load and unload area .
I can definitely say yes it does, especially with the goldmine of unused ideas during the Michael Eisner era.
People are comparing things that were proposed decades ago to what Disney makes now (Discovery Bay and Galaxy’s Edge, Glacier Bay and Toy Story Land, WestCOT and DCA, etc.)The talent of past Imagineers is unrivaled and shows what they were truly capable of creating: fresh original risk taking ideas, not the constant play it safe mentality just because corporate believes parks like EuroDisney failed or non-IP branding cannot work with guests.
Disney has really been coming up short with the concept stuff.
I just think Disney cannot do right for wrong sometimes, concept art is concept art....you know it may never be exact as things do change in development, people need to realise this rather than cry about it when it's not exact, even epic universe isn't "exact" in certain areas, just give Disney time to develop these attractions.
OrangeGrove55. Lads, yes the concept art and the discription of what a new land or attraction will be can hurt fan reception. Here's this an early discription of an attraction to come to Disneyland. From Spring 1978, under the heading, Big Thunder Strkes! "A legend is about to come to life.....Big Thunder Mountain Railroad... roaring its way round Frontierland. The trains will climb to the top of Big Thunder Butte, rest for a few seconds to enjoy the view. Then your train will race you deep down into the long forgotten mines. A deafening avalanche threatens to collapse the mine walls to seal the remaining exit! But in the nick of time, as you are surounded by smoke your train escapes.... back to the safety of Thunder Ridge Depot." Now I might be wrong but I don't think we ever got all that but we ended up with some of it. We did'nt get an attack of flying screeching bats for instance. That's why sometimes a new attraction can be so naff, it's not what we were told it would be. Cheers, Chris Perry.