Patrick Moore is still one of our greatest and wisest Climate citizens. He speaks as one who is not paid off. He is REAL! Albert oil should flow across Canada now.......
Glad that someone is actually doubtful of gov.just never ending deceiving for their own selfish $$$. Greed. The end is near fear mongering.If any real science behind claims then reasonable people would insist and continue too,,, science I was taught.not some telling no doubt..ok past history alone alarming. PLEASE FORWARD TO EVERYONE
@railfandepotproductions Yes David Suzuki was just given another private jet by Burmese oil of Russian. Greta and her parents are multimillionaires thanks to Russan oil Al Gore has 4 multimillion dollar mansions just for giving the Russian oil industry a world wide Monopoly!
the irony of one of the founders of greenpeace saying " the greenies are nutz!" to paraphrase, is slaying me, go patrick old mate , voice of reason trying to save the planet against the people that "want to save the planet" today! mindblowing where leftists have taken the world....
I wish I could have seen the slide deck but he did an excellent job of covering each of the available and potential options to produce energy. I stumbled onto this video through the YT algorithm. It seems I have a bit of hunting to do so I can find Mr. Moore's other presentations.
Dr Patrick Moore is one of my favourite people at this time, common sense wins & people who deliver it will, i hope be the winners. Because if some of this climate change nonsense gets a hold there will be lots of losers & people suffering.
Isostatic rebound post-melt should have resulted in significant sea level rises in areas where things like coral growth cannot keep pace with SL rise due to the simple mechanism of displacement……but we don’t really see it…..do we?
I can't claim to be an expert climatologist, like Dr. Moore. But when visiting the State of Maine last summer I went swimming. The ocean was very cold. This clearly demonstrates that Doctor Moore is right that doubling the CO2 in the air will make this planet a better place for all God's creatures.
Moore is NOT a climatologist, but you are clearly a brainwashed right-winger. He exploited his association with Greenpeace to start his own business to be the mouthpeace for fossil fuel, coal, chemical, and plastics corporations! He has a 100% financial interest in everything he says. And, for anybody with half a brain and the powers of observation, he is DEAD wrong! Shame, shame, shame on his lies!
@@Randolph1233do you only have the right to tlks about a subject if you have a degree in it ? I know one thing, I’ve have learned nothing in school and all the garbage high schools and universities. Experience makes you what you are, not any kind of degree you obtained when you were young.
I just read the negative comments below. As usual "in the pay of oil companies"etc. Not one criticizes the data and corrects it with different facts. As one famous Russian said "useful idiots"
That post proves you are as big a liar as Moore. Moore is a liar. For starters he was not a founder or even co-founder of Greenpeace. He joined an organisation which subsequently changed its name from Don't Make a Wave Committee to Greenpeace He lied when he claimed Greenpeace wanted a global ban on chlorine, the reason he gave for leaving. He lies about CO2 not being mainly responsible for AGW & ACC. He lies about the current elevated CO2 being beneficial for plants etc. It is isn't. He lied about the destruction of the Sumatran rainforest. He cited the already debunked “Oregon Petition” to dismiss the scientific consensus on AGW & ACC. He lied about models being wrong and inaccurate. He lied about there being no scientific proof that man is contributing to climate change. And so on,
"Dr. Patrick Moore, former leader and co-founder of Greenpeace". Two lies to start with, doesn't bode well for the rest, does it? "The Fraser Institute is an independent, non-partisan research and educational organization." Seems you are independent of honesty and reality and very, very partisan. That you do no proper research and your purpose is not to educate but to distort facts for your masters in the fossil fuel industries.
@@boffeycn You have no idea what you are talking about, and are just mindlessly repeating talking points you can't be bothered to think for yourself about. CO2 is not responsible for global warming or climate change. There is no evidence that it is, and very strong evidence that it isn't. For example the 1st half the 20th century was significantly warmer than today. Most of the Holocene was even warmer than that. In both those periods human CO2 emissions very low or non-existent. Elevated CO2 is amazing for plants, try find a single green house operator in the world that doesn't bump up CO2 concentrations in to the thousands. NASA even published satellite images showing the greening effect of CO2. The models are nowhere near observations. The models come nowhere near the satellite record, and are off by 50% of the surface record. From a computer science perspective, this is like having the answers to the exam in front of you and still failing the exam, the IPCC models are an embarrassment to human intellect. There is no scientific proof that man is contributing to climate change. The only argument ever put forward by the IPPC are their invalidated computer models, which are not evidence, much less proof. The Oregon Petition is not debunked. Over 31,000 scientists in the US alone were given a document to read and study in the way they are trained to do as scientists, and if they agreed with the document they were free to sign the petition. If you want to see a debunked consensus (because that's how we do "science" nowadays), look up Legates et al 2013
@@topturkey278 "You have no idea what you are talking about, and are just mindlessly repeating talking points you can't be bothered to think for yourself about." Rather a good self description there. "The Oregon Petition is not debunked." Lie. Tell us about Charles Darwin, members of the Spice Girls and Star Wars having been shown on that list, not to mention IC Ewe repeat names, corporations etc? Legates? Really? The man who claims polar bear numbers are increasing. Exactly how does he know that? The man who states about AGW & ACC "It's not happening" when not a single relevant scientist agrees with him. He claimed “Models have too much sensitivity to climate change, particular with relation to the greenhouse effect, because there’s just too much water in the atmosphere.” But failed to point out that the models have been extremely accurate. He totally agrees and publishes papers with Willie Soon, all of whose claims have been totally debunked, and both he and Soon have been disowned by their Universities.
@@topturkey278 The atmosphere is not a greenhouse but CO2 is a greenhouse gas. When CO2 is added to greenhouses so are large quantities of water and artificial nutrients. When CO2 is added to the atmosphere large quantities of water and artificial nutrients are not available. That Moore is apparently unaware of those facts doesn't say much as to his nous, does it, or yours.
I used to be a uber-liberal Democrat and even believed in Paul Erlich's Population Bomb. But I couldn't vote for the Arkansas Rapists so I began to question my assumptions.
It took 200 acres of mature trees for one wooden hulled ship hence the loss of 90% of mature woodland in the UK and the diversity of the once myriad of types of trees, now replaced with monoculture. We also tamed nature to suit OUR purposes for a better life whilst STILL leaving plants and animals to live alongside or in tandem, we don't blatantly exterminate (we do however make mistakes) but we do change. So ironclad ships came in we eased the pressure on trees (had to really) and since then all sorts of new innovative transport came into being. A Lion does the same thing it did 10,000 years ago and IF by some weird state of play the lion became the most dominant species they would continue to eat any other species it could and the last surviving one (when all other foodstuffs were gone) one would eat its own *ss-hole. Have faith in humanity. Idiots have preached doom since before Jesus imagine the year 999 and the millennials at that time screaming about the end of time?
les accords de Paris n'ont dangereusement pas pris en compte le principal Gaz à Effet de Serre qui est la vapeur d'eau (60% des effets source GIEC, contre 26% pour le CO2). L'eau de l’atmosphère régule les températures des continents depuis des millions d'années mais cette hypothèse a été écartée dès le début en pensant que les activités humaines n'avaient pas d'impact sur l'eau , or il est maintenant prouvé que la disparition de la couverture végétale des continents (déforestation) coupe le cycle de l'eau et provoque les phénomènes climatiques actuels : inondations, sécheresses, canicules et feux ! Sans EAU le soleil est notre ennemi : La Terre subit des rayonnements solaires très nocifs pour la faune et la flore terrestre, l'eau et la vapeur d'eau de l’atmosphère sont nos meilleurs protections. La couverture végétale des sols assurent une humidité permanente de la troposphère par l'évapotranspiration, la permaculture : couverure permanente des sols est une priorité l'été ! des champs verts et vivants l'été c'est 20°c de moins sur des millions d'hectares, des pluies régulières, une sécurité alimentaire et énergétique !
We really should use nuclear train's and container cargo ships. The amount of oil that could be saved for newer technology i feel would help us so much..
12 years later and his non-science is as rubbish as it had been. This "gas of life" nonsense is as silly as "water is the liquid of life" as we watch people drown. Hey Moore, what about the past 12 months of successive record heat?
Overpopulation is a myth! I'm sure you've probably heard that all of the people in the world could fit in the state of Texas and have about 1,000 square feet each. That just shows how big this world really is! There is an enormous amount of empty land. I don't worry about such things,I let the good Lord take care of it!
Why have you not become Sir Patrick Moore , I guess it’s because you tell the whole truth, yet Sir David A tells little lies to favour the Green Lobby , when in fact he should know better .
What bothers me in all of this is the exports of raw logs thay should be milld here .Save the old growth for the natural world it is not like it is going to go any were. There is warmth there for the things that live there. I say this because I made stumps for 32 years I got the pain to prove it have a good day 😊
In Los Angeles they have a County Park called the La Brea Tar Pits on Wilshire Boulevard you can Google or UA-cam to see it but it is raw gooey sticky crude oil on the surface of the ground. Most of Los Angeles basin you couldn't go very far without stepping in or driving through this black goo called crude oil mixed with sand called Tar. Crude oil is a natural part of the earth created by the Earth. Is not our enemy not bad for using it as the doctor says, we are creating a better future for the plants all over the planet
they will not be depleted because they don’t originate from dead dinosaurs. they are of abiotic origin and reservoirs once emptied tend to refill themselves after a while.
Yes. The Alberta Oil Sands are a virtual environmental paradise. It’s as if the garden of eden was uprooted and replanted. There is nothing environmentally damaging when it comes to oil sands. I hear they are thinking of setting up some daycare centres there soon. And if you want to build a house close to the discharge sites, land is really cheap!
Don’t worry DR Moore we here in Australia are going to show the rest of the world how to survive on renewables these clowns here claim they got it all sorted
The fossil fuel industry knew through their own research as early as 1977 that burning gas and oil would cause climate issues such as pollution,rise in global temperatures, more frequent and severe natural disasters such as hurricanes, floods, Forest fires, more health problems and enormous economic problems.
The Heartland Institute is an American conservative and libertarian public policy think tank known for its rejection of the scientific consensus on climate change and the negative health impacts of smoking.This is who Moore works for
You don't 'reject' scientific consensus. You question it. There used to be expert 'consensus' that the earth was the center of the known universe. How'd that turn out? Science is FACT, not consensus. Science used to welcome a robust challenging of theory...now fools like you wish it to be unquestioned dogma, more akin to a religion than a science. Since politicians listen to idiots like you and deny funding to the people who cause the bleating of the sheeple to be the loudest, the only funding available is from that of The Heartland Institute etc.
@@trlltrllenheimer9270 no, Heartland Institute works in favor of big oil companies to confuse the public of the overwhelming scientific evidence supporting man-made climate change. You are the manipulated sheeple and your grandchildren will pay for it.
If it can be questioned, it is science. If it CANNOT be questioned, it is a cult. There is no such thing as scientific "consensus". See, I'm wondering how changing the CO2 concentration from .039% of total gases in the atmosphere, to .04% or even .05% is going to "destroy the planet", as some have claimed. CO2 is not the most abundant greenhouse gas in the atmosphere, that would be water vapor> I have seen how water vapor affects local weather. In winter, at night, when there are clouds, the temperature doesn't drop as much as it does when there are clear skies. Does man affect the climate? Sure, but how MUCH? As much as the sun? Volcanoes? Ocean currents and wind currents? I doubt man can really affect the planet as much as you believe (short of total global thermonuclear war, which WOULD destroy our planet- or our ability to survive on what's left).
@@clubberdang3955 OK, great. Can you refute the science he's bringing to the table? Any of it? You are attacking his character, not his science. The mans a PHD Ecologist after all......who are you exactly?
@@DaJesta088 Patrick is a doubt merchant for environmentally problematic industries. He is not a scientist. Calling himself an ecologist is questionable at best. He is quite convincing, unless he is speaking to an informed, unbiased group; which he avoids.
@@DaJesta088 Pat's naive and simplistic claim that more CO2 is a good thing is wrong. He is so lacking in scientific understanding that he has no business commenting on the subject.
Yes he is a paid shill , makes so many false claims says 10 years ago the plastic that fish , birds ect ingest just gets pooped out , human babies born today have 84630 + TOXINS locked into their bodies on a micro level when born and this guy says toxins in our food is fine ... karm is coming for this guy
@@macalister8881 Cheers. Given all the other lies he makes that doesn't surprise me. Interview with WUWT. I will reference those in future posts. I also note the liars are still referring to him as Greenpeace co-founder.
@@boffeycn it is the agenda of the day , a carbon tax that only god knows where that money really go,s , sickness is our biggest industry , to eat drink and breathe clean is so exspensive , but it feels wonderfull to feel wonderfull , it,s a crazy world we live in , you have a great day
Fun Facts. The atmosphere is not a greenhouse but CO2 is a greenhouse gas. Fun Facts. When CO2 is added to greenhouses so are large quantities of water and artificial nutrients. Fun Facts. When CO2 is added to the atmosphere large quantities of water and artificial nutrients are not available. That your Messiah Moore is apparently unaware of those facts doesn't say much as to his nous, does it,
Fun fact: current levels of CO2 in the atmosphere is around 410 parts per million (ppm).....look it up! For optimum growth, plants need much higher levels of CO2 .....look that up! Google says...... (Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations At 400 PPM Are Still Dangerously Low For Life On Earth) AND ( For most crops the saturation point will be reached at about 1,000-1,300 ppm under ideal circumstances. A lower level (800-1,000 ppm) is recommended for raising seedlings (tomatoes, cucumbers and peppers) as well as for lettuce production.Nov 24, 2020). Bottom line wong ....... at the current levels of CO2 in the world's atmosphere ( 410 ppm), plants are on a starvation diet and yet, climate scientists claim CO2 levels are too high....which is bullshit. The opposite is actually true. BTW.....CARBON DIOXIDE is just one of many greenhouse gases. Why is it the villain? Dr. Moore is one smart cookie. Is it because many do not have the educational background or mental capacity to understand exactly what Dr. Moore says in lectures....hence they default to calling certain of his points.....lies (YOU) as well as making attempts to discredit him by putting a spin on everything that has to do with anything he says or does! The guy has a PhD in Ecology as well as a background in biochemistry and biology. What are your credentials wong?
Apart from your other miss-statements, warmer air can hold a lot more water vapor because relative humidity decreases as temperature increase. Please do your basic fact checking before making idiotic comments
Dr Patrick Moore is a Canadian hero. Love your trip amigo. And I agree totally.
Patrick Moore is still one of our greatest and wisest Climate citizens.
He speaks as one who is not paid off. He is REAL!
Albert oil should flow across Canada now.......
Glad that someone is actually doubtful of gov.just never ending deceiving for their own selfish $$$. Greed. The end is near fear mongering.If any real science behind claims then reasonable people would insist and continue too,,, science I was taught.not some telling no doubt..ok past history alone alarming. PLEASE FORWARD TO EVERYONE
*alberta
@@homoemarrawanna2762Have you ever heard of lobbying? Also you ok with corporate greed?
@railfandepotproductions Yes David Suzuki was just given another private jet by Burmese oil of Russian. Greta and her parents are multimillionaires thanks to Russan oil Al Gore has 4 multimillion dollar mansions just for giving the Russian oil industry a world wide Monopoly!
He is paid off by Oil Corporates LOL : )
A voice of sanity . Thanks and keep trying for the benefit of all of us including Greenpeacers and wokesters.
the irony of one of the founders of greenpeace saying " the greenies are nutz!" to paraphrase, is slaying me, go patrick old mate , voice of reason trying to save the planet against the people that "want to save the planet" today! mindblowing where leftists have taken the world....
Ok big oil salesmen
Thank you Sir for this amazing dissertation. An eye opener to all who have an open mind and just appreciation of our country and its people.
Excellent presentation, informiative as is all of his commonsense talks and interviews.
Patrick Moore is a rational person.
Finally someone gets the power available through nuclear.
Dr. Moore is in rare form here. I've seen a few of his talks and he is interesting.
I wish I could have seen the slide deck but he did an excellent job of covering each of the available and potential options to produce energy. I stumbled onto this video through the YT algorithm. It seems I have a bit of hunting to do so I can find Mr. Moore's other presentations.
It's not too hard to find them. He's with Heartland Institute, google that and his name.
@@suew4609 Thanks 😊
Dr Patrick Moore is one of my favourite people at this time, common sense wins & people who deliver it will, i hope be the winners. Because if some of this climate change nonsense gets a hold there will be lots of losers & people suffering.
Ok big oil fanboy
I can accept what Patrick says. Basic facts that are put in their true context
Excellent talk. It's a pity we can't see his slides though. They would help to clarify his points.
Great to hear a person who knows his science and not relying on government for a income
Did government kill you grandma
Isostatic rebound post-melt should have resulted in significant sea level rises in areas where things like coral growth cannot keep pace with SL rise due to the simple mechanism of displacement……but we don’t really see it…..do we?
Dzp5
I can't claim to be an expert climatologist, like Dr. Moore.
But when visiting the State of Maine last summer I went swimming. The ocean was very cold. This clearly demonstrates that Doctor Moore is right that doubling the CO2 in the air will make this planet a better place for all God's creatures.
Moore is NOT a climatologist, but you are clearly a brainwashed right-winger. He exploited his association with Greenpeace to start his own business to be the mouthpeace for fossil fuel, coal, chemical, and plastics corporations! He has a 100% financial interest in everything he says. And, for anybody with half a brain and the powers of observation, he is DEAD wrong! Shame, shame, shame on his lies!
@@lauriefrancisco1084 , what is your qualification? Are you a climatologist ?
@@Randolph1233 Dr. Moore is!
@@Randolph1233do you only have the right to tlks about a subject if you have a degree in it ? I know one thing, I’ve have learned nothing in school and all the garbage high schools and universities. Experience makes you what you are, not any kind of degree you obtained when you were young.
Ok emo kid
A Canadian hero !!
It is too bad the power point doesn't show.
Fabulous
Fills me w hope
I just read the negative comments below. As usual "in the pay of oil companies"etc.
Not one criticizes the data and corrects it with different facts.
As one famous Russian said "useful idiots"
He mostly contradicts himself anyway.
They are projecting. It's the greenies who get the money from big oil.
You MAGA or something?
It's gotten warmer since the early '70's largely because one of, if not the, lowest average temperature(s) of the 20th century occured in 1971.
The comments being exclusively ad hominem tells me no one can find anything wrong with what Moore is saying.
That post proves you are as big a liar as Moore. Moore is a liar. For starters he was not a founder or even co-founder of Greenpeace.
He joined an organisation which subsequently changed its name from Don't Make a Wave Committee to Greenpeace
He lied when he claimed Greenpeace wanted a global ban on chlorine, the reason he gave for leaving.
He lies about CO2 not being mainly responsible for AGW & ACC.
He lies about the current elevated CO2 being beneficial for plants etc. It is isn't.
He lied about the destruction of the Sumatran rainforest.
He cited the already debunked “Oregon Petition” to dismiss the scientific consensus on AGW & ACC.
He lied about models being wrong and inaccurate.
He lied about there being no scientific proof that man is contributing to climate change.
And so on,
"Dr. Patrick Moore, former leader and co-founder of Greenpeace". Two lies to start with, doesn't bode well for the rest, does it?
"The Fraser Institute is an independent, non-partisan research and educational organization." Seems you are independent of honesty and reality and very, very partisan. That you do no proper research and your purpose is not to educate but to distort facts for your masters in the fossil fuel industries.
@@boffeycn You have no idea what you are talking about, and are just mindlessly repeating talking points you can't be bothered to think for yourself about.
CO2 is not responsible for global warming or climate change. There is no evidence that it is, and very strong evidence that it isn't. For example the 1st half the 20th century was significantly warmer than today. Most of the Holocene was even warmer than that. In both those periods human CO2 emissions very low or non-existent.
Elevated CO2 is amazing for plants, try find a single green house operator in the world that doesn't bump up CO2 concentrations in to the thousands. NASA even published satellite images showing the greening effect of CO2.
The models are nowhere near observations. The models come nowhere near the satellite record, and are off by 50% of the surface record. From a computer science perspective, this is like having the answers to the exam in front of you and still failing the exam, the IPCC models are an embarrassment to human intellect.
There is no scientific proof that man is contributing to climate change. The only argument ever put forward by the IPPC are their invalidated computer models, which are not evidence, much less proof.
The Oregon Petition is not debunked. Over 31,000 scientists in the US alone were given a document to read and study in the way they are trained to do as scientists, and if they agreed with the document they were free to sign the petition. If you want to see a debunked consensus (because that's how we do "science" nowadays), look up Legates et al 2013
@@topturkey278 "You have no idea what you are talking about, and are just mindlessly repeating talking points you can't be bothered to think for yourself about." Rather a good self description there.
"The Oregon Petition is not debunked." Lie. Tell us about Charles Darwin, members of the Spice Girls and Star Wars having been shown on that list, not to mention IC Ewe repeat names, corporations etc?
Legates? Really? The man who claims polar bear numbers are increasing. Exactly how does he know that?
The man who states about AGW & ACC "It's not happening" when not a single relevant scientist agrees with him.
He claimed “Models have too much sensitivity to climate change, particular with relation to the greenhouse effect, because there’s just too much water in the atmosphere.” But failed to point out that the models have been extremely accurate.
He totally agrees and publishes papers with Willie Soon, all of whose claims have been totally debunked, and both he and Soon have been disowned by their Universities.
@@topturkey278 The atmosphere is not a greenhouse but CO2 is a greenhouse gas.
When CO2 is added to greenhouses so are large quantities of water and artificial nutrients.
When CO2 is added to the atmosphere large quantities of water and artificial nutrients are not available.
That Moore is apparently unaware of those facts doesn't say much as to his nous, does it, or yours.
11 years later and this is still valid, probably even more so now than then.
He was saying the opposite in 2010.
I have just watched a video of his from 2010.
He was outlining how we need to get rid of fossil fuels.
Now am older I think and know different...
I used to be a uber-liberal Democrat and even believed in Paul Erlich's Population Bomb. But I couldn't vote for the Arkansas Rapists so I began to question my assumptions.
Not in 2010 he wasn't.
Wish the powerpoint screen was shown!
It took 200 acres of mature trees for one wooden hulled ship hence the loss of 90% of mature woodland in the UK and the diversity of the once myriad of types of trees, now replaced with monoculture. We also tamed nature to suit OUR purposes for a better life whilst STILL leaving plants and animals to live alongside or in tandem, we don't blatantly exterminate (we do however make mistakes) but we do change. So ironclad ships came in we eased the pressure on trees (had to really) and since then all sorts of new innovative transport came into being. A Lion does the same thing it did 10,000 years ago and IF by some weird state of play the lion became the most dominant species they would continue to eat any other species it could and the last surviving one (when all other foodstuffs were gone) one would eat its own *ss-hole. Have faith in humanity. Idiots have preached doom since before Jesus imagine the year 999 and the millennials at that time screaming about the end of time?
Isn't oil sand extraction one barrel used for each 2 barrels extracted ? But in general I agree with Mr. Moore .😊
Volume is too low. Is that intentional by you tube?
It'd be nice if the cameraman could have shown the presentation.
les accords de Paris n'ont dangereusement pas pris en compte le principal Gaz à Effet de Serre qui est la vapeur d'eau (60% des effets source GIEC, contre 26% pour le CO2). L'eau de l’atmosphère régule les températures des continents depuis des millions d'années mais cette hypothèse a été écartée dès le début en pensant que les activités humaines n'avaient pas d'impact sur l'eau , or il est maintenant prouvé que la disparition de la couverture végétale des continents (déforestation) coupe le cycle de l'eau et provoque les phénomènes climatiques actuels : inondations, sécheresses, canicules et feux ! Sans EAU le soleil est notre ennemi : La Terre subit des rayonnements solaires très nocifs pour la faune et la flore terrestre, l'eau et la vapeur d'eau de l’atmosphère sont nos meilleurs protections. La couverture végétale des sols assurent une humidité permanente de la troposphère par l'évapotranspiration, la permaculture : couverure permanente des sols est une priorité l'été ! des champs verts et vivants l'été c'est 20°c de moins sur des millions d'hectares, des pluies régulières, une sécurité alimentaire et énergétique !
We really should use nuclear train's and container cargo ships. The amount of oil that could be saved for newer technology i feel would help us so much..
12 years later and his non-science is as rubbish as it had been. This "gas of life" nonsense is as silly as "water is the liquid of life" as we watch people drown. Hey Moore, what about the past 12 months of successive record heat?
Use real facts to convince others of fake facts...the best way to make misinformation believable.
What a lousy presentation! Cant see what materials if any, presenter is talking about !!! Hard to visualize the talk !!
I'm so tired of all the green BS.
Ok oil simp
What has this guy said about global over population(regardless of ur own opinion please)?
Overpopulation is a myth! I'm sure you've probably heard that all of the people in the world could fit in the state of Texas and have about 1,000 square feet each. That just shows how big this world really is! There is an enormous amount of empty land. I don't worry about such things,I let the good Lord take care of it!
When you let stupid run things, Stupid things happen.!!
Why have you not become Sir Patrick Moore , I guess it’s because you tell the whole truth, yet Sir David A tells little lies to favour the Green Lobby , when in fact he should know better .
Unfortunately there was a Sir Patrick Moore, the famous amateur astronomer & broadcaster who is now dead.
What bothers me in all of this is the exports of raw logs thay should be milld here .Save the old growth for the natural world it is not like it is going to go any were. There is warmth there for the things that live there. I say this because I made stumps for 32 years I got the pain to prove it have a good day 😊
In Los Angeles they have a County Park called the La Brea Tar Pits on Wilshire Boulevard you can Google or UA-cam to see it but it is raw gooey sticky crude oil on the surface of the ground. Most of Los Angeles basin you couldn't go very far without stepping in or driving through this black goo called crude oil mixed with sand called Tar. Crude oil is a natural part of the earth created by the Earth. Is not our enemy not bad for using it as the doctor says, we are creating a better future for the plants all over the planet
Did you go to school?
Exactly..follow the money 💰 🇬🇧 uk
Laughs in what suppose to be a serious matter... Is he a comedian?.... Nup, what this gentleman is exposing is comedy, bad comedy btw.
they will not be depleted because they don’t originate from dead dinosaurs. they are of abiotic origin and reservoirs once emptied tend to refill themselves after a while.
I wish I could see his grafts.
Oil does not run out its filling up all the wells
Yes. The Alberta Oil Sands are a virtual environmental paradise. It’s as if the garden of eden was uprooted and replanted. There is nothing environmentally damaging when it comes to oil sands. I hear they are thinking of setting up some daycare centres there soon. And if you want to build a house close to the discharge sites, land is really cheap!
a lot of people are stoopid...vulnerable to believing anything.
problem with dams (hydro electric) they can and have caused devastating floods
Don’t worry DR Moore we here in Australia are going to show the rest of the world how to survive on renewables these clowns here claim they got it all sorted
🤣 good luck mate
Drank any weed killer lately?
Ahh, now I know where I know the name from.... this is the oil industry Cabon-shill, I've seen him doing his P.R. rounds elsewhere
Who is the robot asleep behind the camera who cannot move the view from the talking head to the graphics screen!
Shame!
Can't see fuck all coz we don't see any graph's or boxes???
look at some of his other speeches on UA-cam, they have the graphs
The fossil fuel industry knew through their own research as early as 1977 that burning gas and oil would cause climate issues such as pollution,rise in global temperatures, more frequent and severe natural disasters such as hurricanes, floods, Forest fires, more health problems and enormous economic problems.
Of course Plastics & Oil are Great ! LOL : )
Nothing to do with the fact that Patrick Moore is financed by ` Big Oil ` Corporates !
❤
And then comes Joe Biden
You MAGA or something?
Ahh REMBER this fella from years ago! Huge Greeny and now ! A very Rich fella! Playing the Real Scam ! EXPerts Eh! Go away NOW!
Wow, lie after lie. So fast you can barely breathe...
😊
Total BS
The Heartland Institute is an American conservative and libertarian public policy think tank known for its rejection of the scientific consensus on climate change and the negative health impacts of smoking.This is who Moore works for
You don't 'reject' scientific consensus. You question it. There used to be expert 'consensus' that the earth was the center of the known universe. How'd that turn out? Science is FACT, not consensus. Science used to welcome a robust challenging of theory...now fools like you wish it to be unquestioned dogma, more akin to a religion than a science. Since politicians listen to idiots like you and deny funding to the people who cause the bleating of the sheeple to be the loudest, the only funding available is from that of The Heartland Institute etc.
@@trlltrllenheimer9270 no, Heartland Institute works in favor of big oil companies to confuse the public of the overwhelming scientific evidence supporting man-made climate change. You are the manipulated sheeple and your grandchildren will pay for it.
If it can be questioned, it is science.
If it CANNOT be questioned, it is a cult.
There is no such thing as scientific "consensus".
See, I'm wondering how changing the CO2 concentration from .039% of total gases in the atmosphere, to .04% or even .05% is going to "destroy the planet", as some have claimed.
CO2 is not the most abundant greenhouse gas in the atmosphere, that would be water vapor>
I have seen how water vapor affects local weather. In winter, at night, when there are clouds, the temperature doesn't drop as much as it does when there are clear skies.
Does man affect the climate? Sure, but how MUCH? As much as the sun? Volcanoes? Ocean currents and wind currents?
I doubt man can really affect the planet as much as you believe (short of total global thermonuclear war, which WOULD destroy our planet- or our ability to survive on what's left).
@@clubberdang3955 OK, great. Can you refute the science he's bringing to the table? Any of it? You are attacking his character, not his science. The mans a PHD Ecologist after all......who are you exactly?
@@texastinman7639 Welcome rational human
Isn't 'Dr.' Patrick the guy that told us drinking a quart of RoundUp is perfectly healthy? now doubling CO2 is a good thing?
"Doctor Moore's Snake Oil" -- Made from nature's purest petroleum and bull manure
So what you're saying is that you have no cogent reply. Typical.
@@DaJesta088 Patrick is a doubt merchant for environmentally problematic industries.
He is not a scientist. Calling himself an ecologist is questionable at best.
He is quite convincing, unless he is speaking to an informed, unbiased group; which he avoids.
@@eveihlone2192 Again. Nothing but ad hominem attacks. Refute his words or go away.
@@DaJesta088 So you believe everything he says? So you are denying the facts posted here about his lies are not true?
@@DaJesta088 Pat's naive and simplistic claim that more CO2 is a good thing is wrong.
He is so lacking in scientific understanding that he has no business commenting on the subject.
"Dr. Patrick Moore, former leader and co-founder of Greenpeace," Given those are blatant lies do you expect anyone to take him seriously?
Yes he is a paid shill , makes so many false claims says 10 years ago the plastic that fish , birds ect ingest just gets pooped out , human babies born today have 84630 + TOXINS locked into their bodies on a micro level when born and this guy says toxins in our food is fine ... karm is coming for this guy
@@macalister8881 Cheers. Given all the other lies he makes that doesn't surprise me. Interview with WUWT. I will reference those in future posts. I also note the liars are still referring to him as Greenpeace co-founder.
@@boffeycn it is the agenda of the day , a carbon tax that only god knows where that money really go,s , sickness is our biggest industry , to eat drink and breathe clean is so exspensive , but it feels wonderfull to feel wonderfull , it,s a crazy world we live in , you have a great day
There are a lot of stupid people who believe blatant lies
@@macalister8881 o
Fun Facts. The atmosphere is not a greenhouse but CO2 is a greenhouse gas.
Fun Facts. When CO2 is added to greenhouses so are large quantities of water and artificial nutrients.
Fun Facts. When CO2 is added to the atmosphere large quantities of water and artificial nutrients are not available.
That your Messiah Moore is apparently unaware of those facts doesn't say much as to his nous, does it,
Fun fact: current levels of CO2 in the atmosphere is around 410 parts per million (ppm).....look it up! For optimum growth, plants need much higher levels of CO2 .....look that up! Google says...... (Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations At 400 PPM Are Still Dangerously Low For Life On Earth) AND ( For most crops the saturation point will be reached at about 1,000-1,300 ppm under ideal circumstances. A lower level (800-1,000 ppm) is recommended for raising seedlings (tomatoes, cucumbers and peppers) as well as for lettuce production.Nov 24, 2020). Bottom line wong ....... at the current levels of CO2 in the world's atmosphere ( 410 ppm), plants are on a starvation diet and yet, climate scientists claim CO2 levels are too high....which is bullshit. The opposite is actually true. BTW.....CARBON DIOXIDE is just one of many greenhouse gases. Why is it the villain? Dr. Moore is one smart cookie. Is it because many do not have the educational background or mental capacity to understand exactly what Dr. Moore says in lectures....hence they default to calling certain of his points.....lies (YOU) as well as making attempts to discredit him by putting a spin on everything that has to do with anything he says or does! The guy has a PhD in Ecology as well as a background in biochemistry and biology. What are your credentials wong?
Apart from your other miss-statements, warmer air can hold a lot more water vapor because relative humidity decreases as temperature increase. Please do your basic fact checking before making idiotic comments
#wong
@@MrTrdawho's Wong?
@@railfandepotproductions 👆that guy