Making a Studio Camera Stand not expensive diy

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 сер 2024
  • Professional Camera Stand everyone can make
    the stuff I used :
    I later replaced the bottom part with this mt.studio.ps/w...
    www.amazon.com...
    www.amazon.com...
    www.amazon.com...
    www.amazon.com...
    www.amazon.it/...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 26

  • @donnababylon
    @donnababylon 3 роки тому +1

    This was very helpful! Thanks

    • @kaptainm8177
      @kaptainm8177  3 роки тому

      I'm happy to share my ideas, let me know if you make it

  • @Denrosss
    @Denrosss 6 місяців тому

    No counterweights can eliminate the vibration of such a design, because its rigidity will not change in any way. This design is not initially rigid. It is not clear why such a device is needed. Studio column tripods have rigidity, which is why they are for the camera, not a stand. There is no need to mislead people.

    • @kaptainm8177
      @kaptainm8177  6 місяців тому

      It worked great for me and it's much better than a normal tripod, other options are much more expensive about 2000 eur for the entry level manfrotto salon stand. If you don't like it just use a normal tripod which sucks for a studio, but if it's better for you that's fine, anyway I used later this bottom part that is more stable : mt.studio.ps/web/image/product.template/4559/image_1024?unique=d6f4e12

  • @garylam8419
    @garylam8419 2 роки тому +1

    love your ideas and about the top extension.. can you give me the size length and wide please.. and just a metal steel right..? thanks G

  • @Denrosss
    @Denrosss 6 місяців тому

    That's funny! This is not a tripod, but a swing. Это смешно! Это не штатив, а качели

    • @kaptainm8177
      @kaptainm8177  6 місяців тому

      You can put weight to make it more stable and there are now more stable stands available like a neewer is almost the same bottom with additional part to make it more stable

    • @Denrosss
      @Denrosss 6 місяців тому

      @@kaptainm8177 No counterweights can eliminate the vibration of such a design, because its rigidity will not change in any way. This design is not initially rigid. It is not clear why such a device is needed. Studio column tripods have rigidity, which is why they are for the camera, not a stand

  • @andyvan5692
    @andyvan5692 3 роки тому

    great build, by the way the problem with the manfrotto screw, is that it is actually two parts: first is a bolt, with a knurled head; second is a nut, round head, the one you turned!!
    this replicates tripods of the 40's and 50's where only screw connections were around, the system works by using the BOLT (brass looking thing on the bottom) to connect to the camera / studio light, etc. HAND TIGHT, then use the NUT ( blue / grey) to remove the play, ( marry the cameras' base to the tripod plate)- there is a channel in the lower face of this nut to put a pin/key, etc. into to torque this nut (1/4 turn only!), then you are done!! one reason for quick release (QR for short) is that this saves time, but as per what I just said, this circular disk and bolt thread can't stop the camera turning on the bolt axis, a QR plate is square / octagonal, which CAN stop the camera turning around! also good idea for other things, so no loosening can occur, esp. with heavy studio lights, or expensive, LF or MF cameras, so no damage to the gear, or models/ actors, or the photographer/ grips, etc.

    • @kaptainm8177
      @kaptainm8177  3 роки тому

      I already updated it and as I suggested in the video I put a (a2 70) screw in the manfrotto connector. I haven't got it around when I was making the video :) thanks for the comment

  • @chrisfrancis18
    @chrisfrancis18 3 роки тому

    great idea. thank you. I think I maybe try and build one

    • @kaptainm8177
      @kaptainm8177  3 роки тому

      it's easy to make, you just get the parts and put it together :)

    • @chrisfrancis18
      @chrisfrancis18 3 роки тому

      @@kaptainm8177 I make one I will send a pic of if sone how

    • @kaptainm8177
      @kaptainm8177  3 роки тому

      @@chrisfrancis18 sure I will be happy to check it out, you can find me on
      FB : facebook.com/mike.untitled.5/

  • @garylam8419
    @garylam8419 2 роки тому

    love your ideas and about the top extension.. can you give me the size tube length and tube size please.. and the top black colour section 's information please thanks G

    • @kaptainm8177
      @kaptainm8177  2 роки тому

      it's a 35mm tube and approximately 210 cm long

  • @Vlad_a450
    @Vlad_a450 3 роки тому +2

    I've made a couple of stands of this quality. It seams to be too wobbling, too unstable. You will want to have something more stable soon. IMHO.

    • @kaptainm8177
      @kaptainm8177  2 роки тому +1

      It depends on what you need, if you need something for macro for example that is super stable then it can be too wobbly, for me it works nicely for most of what I need
      Even for products it works, you can put a weight on the arm to make it more stable.

    • @Denrosss
      @Denrosss 6 місяців тому

      @@kaptainm8177 no, anyway

    • @kaptainm8177
      @kaptainm8177  6 місяців тому +1

      I later replaced the bottom part with this : mt.studio.ps/web/image/product.template/4559/image_1024?unique=d6f4e12

    • @Vlad_a450
      @Vlad_a450 6 місяців тому

      @@kaptainm8177 looks good!
      Does it do the job?

    • @kaptainm8177
      @kaptainm8177  5 місяців тому +1

      @@Vlad_a450yes with this part it's better, it makes that part much more stable, I used it a lot and sometimes I still do because I can carry it around

  • @frm.studio
    @frm.studio 3 роки тому

    Hello how can I connect by You? I do hav some questions. Thank U!

    • @kaptainm8177
      @kaptainm8177  2 роки тому

      Hi, I didn't check this video in a while and haven't seen your message, you can find me on fb and ask me on chat when you find me online : facebook.com/mike.untitled.5/