This is the first UA-cam drama I’ve followed closely and I’m glad it’s not going away. She needs to know the consequences of threatening those who critique you.
It's a 'drama' that quite openly has a 'hero' and a 'villain' because we can openly see what motivated her to go after him, and easily side with him. Normally it's a lot of "he said, she said" or "Big popular creator vs *The Allegations* " I guess you could say IHE vs Daddy Derek was a similar situation, only Daddy Derek was a lot more level headed than SSSniperwolf. Holy crud I just typed that Daddy Derek was level headed, I feel weird.
Unfortunately that’s not how it goes. Even some of the largest controversies are swept under the rug within years. What SSSniperwolf did was nowhere near as bad as filming a corpse (in the eyes of ToS) - and yet Logan still had a very healthy and active channel as well as multiple sponsors and partners.
Hate to say it, but I think we’re not getting any further “punishment” from UA-cam outside of the temp monetary ban. They wiped their hands, blamed both sides, and called it a day.
Can only imagine how devastated UA-cam must have been when they had to do something about James Charles, after MamaSuzan paled around with him publicly then he got into serious legal trouble grooming boys.
finally a video where i can understand all of the drama from the start,thank you scoot for not knowing,i can pretend my favorite horse boy is explaining it to me.
The Actman pointed out that one reason UA-cam goes kidgloves with SSSniperwolf is because she is poaching Tiktok's content, which is pulling the baby market.
This isnt a gender thing, Lia is just their golden child and rakes in an insane amount of cash per upload. She's marketable. Same thing with Logan Paul
Fuck I wish I was in the timeline where these douchebags weren't everywhere and allowed to get away with the most heinous shit. Where being a UA-camr meant fuck-all to society at large instead of now being some aspirational career goal.
I guarantee the editing load from the copyright strikes is what put her over the edge. She wasn’t willing to put in even that much work to reap millions and that’s how entitled she is.
@@philipsalama8083 I didn’t mean personally doing it, It could have been a headache for her to just tell others to do it for her. I don’t imagine she has that professional of a workflow/editor, so it could still have been more work than she’s done in years to “fix” it.
@@spelcheak Also, because many of her videos are made to exactly 8-ish minutes (the length where YT can put two mid-video ads), having to edit out the copyrighted clips will make the videos less than 8-min, meaning she gets less ad revenue.
For real, when the drama first began, I gave the JJJacksfilms channel a watch, thinking it was just a repetitive gimmick channel that would get boring after an hour. I'm now binge watching the entire channel, and it's a blast. Sssniperwolf's content fits way too well for a bingo game.
Another highlight of my day gone. I actually began to understand why the stereotype of old people playing Bingo was fun. Except instead of a plethora of numbers, it's just a flow of predictable cringe.
To put it in Scoot terms, face Jacksfilms was constantly doing promos against heel SSSniperwolf, which made her so angry that she actually fought him backstage.
I felt Adam at the beginning just ‘he doesn’t know and please don’t make me explain internet stuff’ and then you explain it anyway because now it's stuck in your head
She's been recorded in the past saying "you can google it" then it turns out to be a lie then she says "well it used to be there". I think maybe she thinks that the internet is too complex for people to understand.
2:44 god the look on Adam's face whenever Scoot says some high school humor level shit is priceless. Perfect combination of disgust, disappointment and not knowing if he should just respond straight or say some shit back
If there’s any sliver-lining in this mess, it that people seem to have finally realized that letting UA-camrs do whatever they want with zero consequences is actually a bad thing
I would rather someone say "yeah I doxed someone cry about it" than "it's not doxing if you can find their info." If someone says that they should receive an additional punishment on top of whatever stalking/harassment charges they get and it should be worse.
To be fair, doxing isn't actually illegal. Like I get cases can often be pretty reprehensible and should be discouraged but this feels like some big cancel culture memes with how rabid some people are getting.
@@Jrezyou clearly don't understand how dangerous it is... Especially when the person doing it has like 5 million followers. There's bound to be some crazy white knights in there. This behavior should absolutely be socially shunned.
@@Jrez I'm obviously joking that giving a lame excuse is worse than stalking and harassment. There's not enough negativity in the yms fanbase for concern trolling mr cancel culture memes.
@@Phoenix0F8 that's accurate. I even saw someone mention "oh, we shouldn't use the gender aspect, it's not because she's a woman that she's privileged" and i was like.. it kind is... She brings the point that she's "just an inofensive woman" many times as some kind of defense.
Sssniperwolf came over to Jack's house to 'Just talk to him' She has a criminal record for armed robbery. Why does that remind me of that time Peter Griffin kept saying 'I just wanna talk to him' while loading his shotgun
It has nothing to do with her being a woman. UA-cam has shown the same behaviour with other popular male creators. It's just about money. She creates a lot of views from a marketable demographic mostly on devices without the ability to adblock. They're capitalists, nothing more.
it really feels like SSSniperNoSniping got exactly what she wanted. Jack stopped making the videos that were driving the movement against her. I hope some more bigger youtubers pick up Jack's torch and keep doing the good work he was doing. I worry about it just dying out otherwrise. She and youtube. both needn to be held accountable
When all is said and done, content creators will be inspired by Jack's content and create amazing stuff of their own, while SSSniperwolf will fade into complete obscurity once a slightly more attractive girl steals her niche.
I mean sure, but also when all is said and done, she will have made several fortunes off stealing content and got away with spitting on those who stand up to her even slightly. I'm not sure her goal is to become some cultural icon
The funny thing is that they could say "we demonetized her for a month" (which is fucking nothing by the way, it wouldn't matter to her at all), and the they could just, like, not do it, and no one would know
@@MrZachtheKingsfanthat's cool to know because I live in a country where I don't get youtibe adds even with no adblock and its extremely sickening going to the states or Canada. What is allowed there is repulsive.
I envy being as innocent as Scoot and somehow being able to hear about this for the first time just now. I wish I knew what not being chronically online was like.
@@notscotthenson But then I wouldn’t be able to hear about what you and Adum get up to 😢 in all seriousness, it’s good advice! Unfortunately I’m disabled so the internet is a crutch of sorts, much easier to socialise online, as much as I rather prefer in person stuff
If SSSniperwolf reacts this way for being called out for stealing content on UA-cam, I can only image how she reacted to being charged with armed robbery
This situation is literally making content creators reconsider alternative platforms like rumble. UA-cam literally wouldn't lose anything by banning sssssssniperwolf, her viewers will stay on the platform and spread out to other creators that are less of a legal liability than ssniperwolf. UA-cam is doing nothing but shoot themselves in the foot with this. All it takes for this situation to explode is one tiktoker with enough money to file a lawsuit and youtube will be in a world of trouble. Literally just ban ssniperwolf lmao
I agree that standing by her was not a financially driven motive for youtube. Individual creators are meaningless as far as profits are concerned to this behemoth. I think youtube's error came earlier, though. They shouldn't pick and choose creators; they're bad at it and in any case what does it get for youtube as a company? If they hadn't backed her in the first place, jack wouldn't have got involved in the issue. And even if he had, they wouldn't have felt obliged to protect her. They trapped themselves by becoming attached to _yet another_ narcissistic fool. So you might be correct; banning her might make more sense but they really should detach themselves from the personalities altogether. UA-cam gets nothing out of backing "special" creators apart from headaches.
Despite being on UA-cam a lot I’m just now hearing about this drama. Glad YMS was here to help me get a good grasp on what’s happening because I feel out of the loop.
Tbf, someone with the intellect of a 9 year old like SssW would easily see it as mocking and harassment and not understand why everyone isn't on her side.
See, but she doesn’t ACTUALLY have the intellect of a nine year old, she just PRETENDS she does. She is well aware of what she’s doing, that she’ll be free of major consequence, and is intentionally playing victim/dumb about the whole thing
Yeah SSSniperworlf reacted because it got under her skin and ego. but creators were reaching out to Jack about what they could do about their content being stolen, and Jack was basically starting to help organize a movement of creators who had their content stolen to copyright claim SSSniperwolf's videos. Leading up to the freakout, multiple of her videos had sections removed. Undoubtedly, SSSniperwolf wouldn't have cared about Jack's videos, other than calling him a creep pretty unsubtly in her videos, if it didn't escalate to hurting her bottom line.
How a non-creating, non-reacting UA-camr has more subscribers than so many great channels, that put real effort into their videos, I'll never understand?
During the latest react-gate cycle, I think it was Act Man who suggested that maybe the owners of the original copyright should be able to claim the income of videos that steal their content. It would probably result in heaps of freebooters claiming her videos, but it would stop her from stealing content real fast.
Sniper wolf the worst of fake gamer, egirl, & npc because she’s not honest about it only acting when it threatens her income. Also her sister when was in the photo with her is just as bad
Even if you can find someone's address on Google, there's a huge difference between that and a celebrity doing the work for literally millions of people that hate them but may not have looked it up otherwise. It's like giving millions of people that hate you weapons. One of them is going to be unstable enough to do something with it.
I remember WAY back in the day finding sssniperwolf because i was/am a HUGE Metal Gear Solid fan and by searching the character Sniper Wolf i found a chick who dressed up like her and that lead me to sssniperwolfe. Thats all. Thats all i know about her other than my 7 year old niece watches her while she dances.
You don’t need to look at the “jacksfilm” part of her apology to realize it’s AI generated. Because you could immediately tell it was when she said “I will reach out (to jack)”. Like there’s no fucking way she would actually do that, especially to him. That’s a very common thing to include in an apology, so it makes sense why an AI would include that.
As someone who was in a very hyperspecific niche of UA-cam creators who all got into very public spats whose UA-cam channels became a day by day diary of their demise as creators, this behavior is not unique to high profile UA-camrs, it's merely more publicized.
also saying shit like "you can find his address by googling it" as a defense actually just encourages people to look up his address, some other youtuber showed that "jacksfilms address" had a lot of searches right after she said that, she simply does not think before she speaks, or before she acts
3:08 there’s a difference between personal and private property. You have to have some stuff of your own in order to exist, and space where you aren’t exposed to the elements, prying eyes etc. Opposing private property doesn’t entail opposing personal property, or privaCY- or at least doesn’t if you’re well adjusted. You’re still allowed a home where you can be safe. Personal property CAN be oppressive, but only in select circumstances, and not simply BECAUSE you require space and resources to subsist. (This chatter may well have been joking but this is a common misinterpretation)
@3:15ish To answer the chatter, private property isn't relevant here. The house you live in is personal property. Public property, personal property, and private property are the 3 types of property. Being against the existence of private property doesn't mean being against the existence of personal property.
At first, i was like, "Big deal, a hot chick showed up at your house unannounced. Most guys would love for that to happen!" Then i found out she (sssniperwolf) was convicted of armed robbery, and suddenly jacks concern was a bit more understandable.
I've been gone for a bit, so hoping someone can answer: what was the 8 second clip that got YMS Highlights demonitized, what vid was it on, and why was it apparently "so bad"?
it was a clip from spiral, that saw movie with chris rock. it was a clip that showed how badly the "jumpscare" they attempted was cut in the movie, and it was its own video that was only 8 seconds. i think it was a problem cuz it was a clip from the movie, but it was only 8 seconds and didn't require the whole channel to get demonetized which is why adum is rightfully salty about it. there is a video on this channel where he talks about it if you want more detailed info on it, this is what i remember off the top of my head :)
Now that YMS mentioned it I unironically think a big factor of Sniperwolf not being removed is they're worried about bad publicity over it. Like let's be totally real with ourselves here, only real UA-cam-brained people are gonna understand the ethics behind what she's doing. Your average outsider looking in likely will not care at all and instead view it from the most superficial lens of "guy harassing successful woman for being successful" which Sniperwolf would almost 100% lean into as a defense if she was properly punished. Add on the fact that old media regularly will take potshots at UA-cam at any opportunity and I can really see why they don't want to take any major actions over her.
I disagree with one thing here and that’s the gender argument. I think the reason why UA-cam didn’t act on sniperwolfs actions is because she is tremendously huge when it comes to subscribers and viewers and UA-cam has invested in her as a creator by tweeting about her and what not. I believe that UA-cam would act similarly if a male UA-camr of a similar size that makes the same type of content doxxed someone in the same manner as she did.
I don't even understand how she is allowed to exist on UA-cam with that borderline hate speech channel name. Seriously how is anyone giving her the benefit of the doubt?
"It's not doxxing, I just accessed their private info without their knowledge, drove to their house, and broadcast their home to millions before encouraging them to do the same!" Yeah, kinda sounds like doxxing.
I believe it was The Act Man who said that the main reason that UA-cam isn't doing any real punishment for her is because 1. they recently endorsed her and 2. that she is taking revenue away Tiktok and putting it on to UA-cam itself by "reacting" like she does. Both of those make more sense to me than the whole "if the genders were reversed it wouldn't be the same" argument, though there may be some of that involved as well.
I'm not sure if the person who said they don't believe in private property so they don't know if they should be upset about this is referring to the use of content she didn't make or the doxxing but I can comment on both. For the former, it is true that the earnings aspect of IP is a verycapitalist problem, but living under capitalism as most of these people do requires earning some money and it is wrong to take that away for personal gain, and even if there were no money to be made there is the issue of people trying to get the stuff they make out there, and not crediting them means that stuff is no longer connected to them so only that one thing gets seen. Artists make art and want it to be observed. For doxxing, a home isn't private property until you rent it to someone. A home is personal property and there is a difference. You can believe that you don't own the land that it is on, and that is reasonable imo, but the location where you live is personal information and yours to give or keep.
ignoring that she looks worse than an ai image of the "gamer girl" prompt,i never know how you can find a girl like that attractive,the moment she opens her mouth i want to be in a 5 km radius away from her like she's radioactive lmao.
Young girls idolise her because she's pretty and makes millions with hardly any effort. She's living the dream, and in many cases they'd clearly much rather aspire to that than to actually work hard to get an education and potentially never earn even a thousandth of the money, and get none of the adulation she gets. The reason OnlyFans is also now seen as an acceptable vocation for girls of an old enough age is clearly a development of that mindset - loads of people paying you money and telling you how great you are while the money rolls in. I honestly think far more girls watch her than boys, even though the assumed response is always that it's boys simping for her. This is all helped by an increasingly narcissistic attitude among young people, where they are led to believe that you should believe in yourself and your ability in spite of any criticism, and never accept responsibility or accountability. The worst part about this whole saga is that it has reinforced the idea that you should be confident in yourself and your actions - because let's face it, Sssniperwolf got away with it, and UA-cam even blamed them equally in their response. UA-cam's response to all this has been almost as irresponsible as hers, as they have basically said 'you can do whatever you like as long as you're pretty and make money'.
all these years and i just noticed it 💀,honestly i was better without knowing that,having one of my favorite franchises associated with this disgusting person is almost as bad as the remasters that just came out.
I always thought it was weird, especially in the Dharr Mann videos where the little girls youtube name was Psycho Mantis. The references somehow feel sickly
I don't think banning SSSniperwolf for a month would do anything. On one hand, this won't cripple her financially, but on the other hand, ...it won't cripple her financially. If it doesn't leave a long-lasting impact on her revenue, then she's not gonna care. If she's milking her channel as a content cow, then the only way to teach her it's immoral is to have it not be viable.
i think the lips is makeup because you can see her without makeup and shes, normal, like plain as hell. i do think something is up but she do be doing a lot of make up
Honestly I don't think yt is scared to ban SS if anything I'd assume they want to stall out untill Nov/December is over since her veiws along with the sheer amount of ads that get pushed comes out during the xmas season but that's just my opinion.
@@BlurredborderlinesPeople will tell you UA-cam/Google is untouchable, but it's not. I'm Australian and I saw them get taken to court by a loser politician we have here and they just folded. I reckon if enough mid-to-big creators get together and demand better they could equal the power of that politician easily. Hell, I'd even donate to it myself if it meant we could get some damn justice for once.
I'll admit, I kind of wish the roles were reversed. Then we could trend the hashtag #JackOffUA-cam
This is the best comment but it got caught in the filter. I'm glad I randomly checked it or UA-cam would've deleted it, lmao.
This is the first UA-cam drama I’ve followed closely and I’m glad it’s not going away. She needs to know the consequences of threatening those who critique you.
come to think of it I bet even Daddy Derek would know better than to doxx somebody
It's a 'drama' that quite openly has a 'hero' and a 'villain' because we can openly see what motivated her to go after him, and easily side with him. Normally it's a lot of "he said, she said" or "Big popular creator vs *The Allegations* "
I guess you could say IHE vs Daddy Derek was a similar situation, only Daddy Derek was a lot more level headed than SSSniperwolf. Holy crud I just typed that Daddy Derek was level headed, I feel weird.
Unfortunately that’s not how it goes. Even some of the largest controversies are swept under the rug within years. What SSSniperwolf did was nowhere near as bad as filming a corpse (in the eyes of ToS) - and yet Logan still had a very healthy and active channel as well as multiple sponsors and partners.
I mean, she did get away with it in the end with only just a slap on the wrist. The fact that she even got that is a miracle.
Hate to say it, but I think we’re not getting any further “punishment” from UA-cam outside of the temp monetary ban. They wiped their hands, blamed both sides, and called it a day.
*SSSniperwolf:* "I have done nothing wrong, ever, in my life."
*UA-cam:* "I know this, and I love you."
Shit, how do you clean up vomit?
Jacksfilms: "I want to feel safe in my own home"
UA-cam: "Y'all hear som'?"
“Money please!”
she probably sucked some youtube employee
Can only imagine how devastated UA-cam must have been when they had to do something about James Charles, after MamaSuzan paled around with him publicly then he got into serious legal trouble grooming boys.
finally a video where i can understand all of the drama from the start,thank you scoot for not knowing,i can pretend my favorite horse boy is explaining it to me.
@@donovanlocust1106 i actually caused severe brain damage to myself, just to forget everything and have this experience.
The Actman pointed out that one reason UA-cam goes kidgloves with SSSniperwolf is because she is poaching Tiktok's content, which is pulling the baby market.
TikTok is their biggest competitor as a video sharing site, and that's all they care about.
What a weird phrase. Baby market. This worlds become a worse version of the cable guy.
@helmepodesarius2198 if you watch or like tiktok you have a baby brain.
He is 100% right on that. UA-cam has been pandering to literal babies since years, trying to turn youtbe toddler friendly.
The Baby Market made me stare off into space for a full minute
This isnt a gender thing, Lia is just their golden child and rakes in an insane amount of cash per upload. She's marketable. Same thing with Logan Paul
Fuck I wish I was in the timeline where these douchebags weren't everywhere and allowed to get away with the most heinous shit. Where being a UA-camr meant fuck-all to society at large instead of now being some aspirational career goal.
Not a gender thing at all, no.
I guarantee the editing load from the copyright strikes is what put her over the edge. She wasn’t willing to put in even that much work to reap millions and that’s how entitled she is.
I highly, highly doubt she does her own editing.
@@philipsalama8083 I didn’t mean personally doing it, It could have been a headache for her to just tell others to do it for her. I don’t imagine she has that professional of a workflow/editor, so it could still have been more work than she’s done in years to “fix” it.
@@spelcheak Also, because many of her videos are made to exactly 8-ish minutes (the length where YT can put two mid-video ads), having to edit out the copyrighted clips will make the videos less than 8-min, meaning she gets less ad revenue.
@@jack90054Or meaning she has to record more "reactions"
I need more “Adum explains _______ to Scoot” content
@wordlespoems dammit…
*proceeds to cry in grief*
it's sad that bingo is probably cancelled indefinitely
It was banger content
For real, when the drama first began, I gave the JJJacksfilms channel a watch, thinking it was just a repetitive gimmick channel that would get boring after an hour.
I'm now binge watching the entire channel, and it's a blast. Sssniperwolf's content fits way too well for a bingo game.
Another highlight of my day gone.
I actually began to understand why the stereotype of old people playing Bingo was fun.
Except instead of a plethora of numbers, it's just a flow of predictable cringe.
It's back baby!
To put it in Scoot terms, face Jacksfilms was constantly doing promos against heel SSSniperwolf, which made her so angry that she actually fought him backstage.
Now we're talkin'
Don't work yourself into a shoot
I heard Sundae bit SSSniperwolf and they blamed it on Jack. Also, Neal Mohan feared for his life
And then Sniperwolf ate some muffins and did nothing wrong.
10:53 "i don't even know what that mean" well as we know, "Ignorance of the lawl is not an asscuse" as Daddy Derek taught us.
Ignorant* of the lawl
Scoot didnt know because she's a wolf, not a tiger.
She doesn’t deserve to be sssnipertiger
We all know Scoot is a huge spiciest, shows how strong his friendship is with Adam and Guile is.
@@WillDaBeardalso very sexist
Scoot only fucks with cubs
@@WillDaBeardI'm kind of a hero
I felt Adam at the beginning just ‘he doesn’t know and please don’t make me explain internet stuff’ and then you explain it anyway because now it's stuck in your head
That’s how I’d feel if someone asked me what a Sonichu or Chris Chan is.
She's been recorded in the past saying "you can google it" then it turns out to be a lie then she says "well it used to be there". I think maybe she thinks that the internet is too complex for people to understand.
2:44 god the look on Adam's face whenever Scoot says some high school humor level shit is priceless. Perfect combination of disgust, disappointment and not knowing if he should just respond straight or say some shit back
What makes this situation worse is Doxing is a crime in California which is where this incident happened
If there’s any sliver-lining in this mess, it that people seem to have finally realized that letting UA-camrs do whatever they want with zero consequences is actually a bad thing
Agree. Hopefully YT will also come to that conclusion soon…
How have people forgotten logan paul and the suicide forest already? I thought we reached this conclusion years ago 🤣
I would rather someone say "yeah I doxed someone cry about it" than "it's not doxing if you can find their info." If someone says that they should receive an additional punishment on top of whatever stalking/harassment charges they get and it should be worse.
Or if they say "I literally don't know how to doxx"
To be fair, doxing isn't actually illegal. Like I get cases can often be pretty reprehensible and should be discouraged but this feels like some big cancel culture memes with how rabid some people are getting.
@@Jrezyou clearly don't understand how dangerous it is...
Especially when the person doing it has like 5 million followers. There's bound to be some crazy white knights in there. This behavior should absolutely be socially shunned.
It gets people swatted and stalked. But yeah, sure, its definitely not a problem. Keep simping harder.@@Jrez
@@Jrez I'm obviously joking that giving a lame excuse is worse than stalking and harassment. There's not enough negativity in the yms fanbase for concern trolling mr cancel culture memes.
Her channel not being terminated shows that criticism on big creators is not allowed around here.
*criticism of moderately attractive white women
@@Phoenix0F8 that's accurate. I even saw someone mention "oh, we shouldn't use the gender aspect, it's not because she's a woman that she's privileged" and i was like.. it kind is... She brings the point that she's "just an inofensive woman" many times as some kind of defense.
Critiquing content is not equal exchange with doxxing. These two things cannot be more asymmetrical.
Sssniperwolf came over to Jack's house to 'Just talk to him'
She has a criminal record for armed robbery.
Why does that remind me of that time Peter Griffin kept saying 'I just wanna talk to him' while loading his shotgun
Her other arrest was for getting in a fight.
It has nothing to do with her being a woman. UA-cam has shown the same behaviour with other popular male creators. It's just about money. She creates a lot of views from a marketable demographic mostly on devices without the ability to adblock. They're capitalists, nothing more.
My thanks to Scoot on this, I will now insist forever that SSSniperwolf is actually a boat.
The USSsniperwolf, recently deployed to the Persian Gulf to dox Iranian missiles
I don’t know why but Scoot’s “what?” After Adam asked if he has a friend named douchy made me crack up
Adam should make a channel called SSSniperHorse
lea might accuse him of stalking and doxx him too
@@everfluctuating would god punish Vancouver with another outbreak of Covid?
it really feels like SSSniperNoSniping got exactly what she wanted. Jack stopped making the videos that were driving the movement against her. I hope some more bigger youtubers pick up Jack's torch and keep doing the good work he was doing. I worry about it just dying out otherwrise. She and youtube. both needn to be held accountable
Man if I had any type of audience I'd do it. She'd have to cross continents to dox me
I thought bullies were fat without friends
SSsniperwolf: boy, I feel like picking on someone today! And look over there, if it’s not Jacksfilms! He thinks he’s so cool, we’ll I’m gonna Dawx um!
When all is said and done, content creators will be inspired by Jack's content and create amazing stuff of their own, while SSSniperwolf will fade into complete obscurity once a slightly more attractive girl steals her niche.
Not to mention the Wall is coming for her...
I mean sure, but also when all is said and done, she will have made several fortunes off stealing content and got away with spitting on those who stand up to her even slightly.
I'm not sure her goal is to become some cultural icon
We had reply girls back when UA-cam was in year 2, and I defy anyone to remember them from those years
The funny thing is that they could say "we demonetized her for a month" (which is fucking nothing by the way, it wouldn't matter to her at all), and the they could just, like, not do it, and no one would know
People actually would find out. Aside from the obvious ads still being played, there are extensions that show when a video is being monetized.
She’s dodging the ban by uploading on a second channel, so the ban isn’t even working
@@MrZachtheKingsfan I see, however ads can play on not monetised videos too
@@gameb9oy which is against the rules btw, surely UA-cam will punish her
@@MrZachtheKingsfanthat's cool to know because I live in a country where I don't get youtibe adds even with no adblock and its extremely sickening going to the states or Canada. What is allowed there is repulsive.
I envy being as innocent as Scoot and somehow being able to hear about this for the first time just now. I wish I knew what not being chronically online was like.
The only time Scoot has been innocent
Then get offline. It's shockingly easy.
@@notscotthenson But then I wouldn’t be able to hear about what you and Adum get up to 😢 in all seriousness, it’s good advice! Unfortunately I’m disabled so the internet is a crutch of sorts, much easier to socialise online, as much as I rather prefer in person stuff
@@Evanz111 True. And that's fair. I think the best happy medium is to only go online for things I do.
Well this is my first time heating about it because I haven't looked at the trending page in months. Looks like I'm in for a treat.
She made fun of Jack's hairline despite having a Sylvester Stallone mouth. Classic.
And brain
@@sayLeotardbutsayitChineseHarsh
Stallone has a double digit IQ, that's one more digit than content sniperwolf
The Meatcanyon video about SS Sniperwolf is going to be amazing.
Her response is going to say "why are these creeps obsessed with me?"
@@thewholecircus2792 no cap, these Bros mad down bad, on god.
If SSSniperwolf reacts this way for being called out for stealing content on UA-cam, I can only image how she reacted to being charged with armed robbery
Just imagine you're on livestream and you see someone in chat say "hey I don't want to alarm you but sssniperwolf is outside your house right now"
Honestly just should be memed more
This situation is literally making content creators reconsider alternative platforms like rumble.
UA-cam literally wouldn't lose anything by banning sssssssniperwolf, her viewers will stay on the platform and spread out to other creators that are less of a legal liability than ssniperwolf.
UA-cam is doing nothing but shoot themselves in the foot with this.
All it takes for this situation to explode is one tiktoker with enough money to file a lawsuit and youtube will be in a world of trouble.
Literally just ban ssniperwolf lmao
I agree that standing by her was not a financially driven motive for youtube. Individual creators are meaningless as far as profits are concerned to this behemoth.
I think youtube's error came earlier, though. They shouldn't pick and choose creators; they're bad at it and in any case what does it get for youtube as a company? If they hadn't backed her in the first place, jack wouldn't have got involved in the issue. And even if he had, they wouldn't have felt obliged to protect her. They trapped themselves by becoming attached to _yet another_ narcissistic fool. So you might be correct; banning her might make more sense but they really should detach themselves from the personalities altogether.
UA-cam gets nothing out of backing "special" creators apart from headaches.
Yeah, that's what gets me.
"But she's making them so much money!"
...no. She isn't.
Nah, she knows shes doing something wrong. She just also knows she can get away with it.
Despite being on UA-cam a lot I’m just now hearing about this drama. Glad YMS was here to help me get a good grasp on what’s happening because I feel out of the loop.
Tbf, someone with the intellect of a 9 year old like SssW would easily see it as mocking and harassment and not understand why everyone isn't on her side.
See, but she doesn’t ACTUALLY have the intellect of a nine year old, she just PRETENDS she does. She is well aware of what she’s doing, that she’ll be free of major consequence, and is intentionally playing victim/dumb about the whole thing
Yeah SSSniperworlf reacted because it got under her skin and ego. but creators were reaching out to Jack about what they could do about their content being stolen, and Jack was basically starting to help organize a movement of creators who had their content stolen to copyright claim SSSniperwolf's videos. Leading up to the freakout, multiple of her videos had sections removed. Undoubtedly, SSSniperwolf wouldn't have cared about Jack's videos, other than calling him a creep pretty unsubtly in her videos, if it didn't escalate to hurting her bottom line.
I’ve never thought I’d say scoot is literally me but damn
How a non-creating, non-reacting UA-camr has more subscribers than so many great channels, that put real effort into their videos, I'll never understand?
Scoot has the sense of humor of a politically incorrect 2000s comedy show and I'm here for it.
100% the vibe I'm going for
It always astounds me how youtube personalities struggle to behave. It's real easy to do.
During the latest react-gate cycle, I think it was Act Man who suggested that maybe the owners of the original copyright should be able to claim the income of videos that steal their content. It would probably result in heaps of freebooters claiming her videos, but it would stop her from stealing content real fast.
I'm also onboard with that whole 'give it four days before reacting' idea too. I've seen Asmongold following that model after the two of them chatted.
@@lordkrauser also reaction channels shouldn’t use the original thumbnail or title
Sniper wolf the worst of fake gamer, egirl, & npc because she’s not honest about it only acting when it threatens her income. Also her sister when was in the photo with her is just as bad
Even if you can find someone's address on Google, there's a huge difference between that and a celebrity doing the work for literally millions of people that hate them but may not have looked it up otherwise.
It's like giving millions of people that hate you weapons. One of them is going to be unstable enough to do something with it.
What a fantastic thumbnail
This was very enjoyable, thank u
I remember WAY back in the day finding sssniperwolf because i was/am a HUGE Metal Gear Solid fan and by searching the character Sniper Wolf i found a chick who dressed up like her and that lead me to sssniperwolfe. Thats all. Thats all i know about her other than my 7 year old niece watches her while she dances.
Adum going through sniper alley brought back some painful memories.
1:30 Scoot and Adum desperately trying not to say "women", I've gotchu
Also, I'm tired so - it's a joke, I'm a woman please don't cancel me, I have a cute cat etc etc
I actually wasn't thinking gender-specific at the time, but now that you mention it, yes, it is all women.
You don’t need to look at the “jacksfilm” part of her apology to realize it’s AI generated. Because you could immediately tell it was when she said “I will reach out (to jack)”. Like there’s no fucking way she would actually do that, especially to him. That’s a very common thing to include in an apology, so it makes sense why an AI would include that.
Alternative Title: Adam wants to play a game, but is forced to talk about SSSniperwolf
This criminal needs to face legal action for her dangerous and heinous actions.
"She likes dogs. She must be a good person."
Lots of people eat dogs, that doesn't make her special.
I think UA-cam won't take action because she makes the platform so much money. They're a business at the end of the day.
Plastic surgery lips also known as "fish lips".
Also known as those suction cup things on the solar panels in mario sunshine.
That mugshot is refreshing. Actually get to see the real SS sniperwolf.
As someone who was in a very hyperspecific niche of UA-cam creators who all got into very public spats whose UA-cam channels became a day by day diary of their demise as creators, this behavior is not unique to high profile UA-camrs, it's merely more publicized.
i liked scoot's "jacks off" joke too much
Guys. Scoot made Baby great again. He did it.
I wish UA-cam stopped picking favorites, it pisses me off!!!
also saying shit like "you can find his address by googling it" as a defense actually just encourages people to look up his address, some other youtuber showed that "jacksfilms address" had a lot of searches right after she said that, she simply does not think before she speaks, or before she acts
10:08 is the start of the best exchange in this
10:41 "I can do no wrong, for I do not know what it is"
- Satan, The Adventures Of Mark Twain
3:08 there’s a difference between personal and private property. You have to have some stuff of your own in order to exist, and space where you aren’t exposed to the elements, prying eyes etc.
Opposing private property doesn’t entail opposing personal property, or privaCY- or at least doesn’t if you’re well adjusted. You’re still allowed a home where you can be safe. Personal property CAN be oppressive, but only in select circumstances, and not simply BECAUSE you require space and resources to subsist.
(This chatter may well have been joking but this is a common misinterpretation)
“…Than a plastic monster…” 🤣 god I fucking love scoot
@3:15ish To answer the chatter, private property isn't relevant here. The house you live in is personal property. Public property, personal property, and private property are the 3 types of property. Being against the existence of private property doesn't mean being against the existence of personal property.
Petition to make 'YMS explains things' a thing
At first, i was like, "Big deal, a hot chick showed up at your house unannounced. Most guys would love for that to happen!" Then i found out she (sssniperwolf) was convicted of armed robbery, and suddenly jacks concern was a bit more understandable.
I love your supplemental info
It's hard to prove someone isn't as stupid as they claim to be.
I've been gone for a bit, so hoping someone can answer: what was the 8 second clip that got YMS Highlights demonitized, what vid was it on, and why was it apparently "so bad"?
it was a clip from spiral, that saw movie with chris rock. it was a clip that showed how badly the "jumpscare" they attempted was cut in the movie, and it was its own video that was only 8 seconds. i think it was a problem cuz it was a clip from the movie, but it was only 8 seconds and didn't require the whole channel to get demonetized which is why adum is rightfully salty about it. there is a video on this channel where he talks about it if you want more detailed info on it, this is what i remember off the top of my head :)
16:07 Dylan burns demonetization is the most bullshit thing
Thx for coverin
"i like that!" love you scoot
The Internet will forget eventually, no matter how hard we will try to keep it our minds... we will forget...
12:54 Sssssnooperwolf sent that monster after you
Now that YMS mentioned it I unironically think a big factor of Sniperwolf not being removed is they're worried about bad publicity over it.
Like let's be totally real with ourselves here, only real UA-cam-brained people are gonna understand the ethics behind what she's doing. Your average outsider looking in likely will not care at all and instead view it from the most superficial lens of "guy harassing successful woman for being successful" which Sniperwolf would almost 100% lean into as a defense if she was properly punished. Add on the fact that old media regularly will take potshots at UA-cam at any opportunity and I can really see why they don't want to take any major actions over her.
Man I forgot how good Elden Ring is.
16:30 SERIOUSLY! Why do you have to mess with people like that!?
She makes UA-cam way too much money for her to ever face serious punishment.
Adam: "She threw a bomb on an orphanage"
Scoot: "Lol Okay, I like that"
I disagree with one thing here and that’s the gender argument. I think the reason why UA-cam didn’t act on sniperwolfs actions is because she is tremendously huge when it comes to subscribers and viewers and UA-cam has invested in her as a creator by tweeting about her and what not. I believe that UA-cam would act similarly if a male UA-camr of a similar size that makes the same type of content doxxed someone in the same manner as she did.
honestly have no idea who Lemonwarrior is or how they have been in the hit game among us so much
I don't even understand how she is allowed to exist on UA-cam with that borderline hate speech channel name. Seriously how is anyone giving her the benefit of the doubt?
Money.
"It's not doxxing, I just accessed their private info without their knowledge, drove to their house, and broadcast their home to millions before encouraging them to do the same!"
Yeah, kinda sounds like doxxing.
well now i need moar vids of adum explaining yt and twitch drama while sporadically screaming at a video game
I believe it was The Act Man who said that the main reason that UA-cam isn't doing any real punishment for her is because 1. they recently endorsed her and 2. that she is taking revenue away Tiktok and putting it on to UA-cam itself by "reacting" like she does. Both of those make more sense to me than the whole "if the genders were reversed it wouldn't be the same" argument, though there may be some of that involved as well.
I'm not sure if the person who said they don't believe in private property so they don't know if they should be upset about this is referring to the use of content she didn't make or the doxxing but I can comment on both.
For the former, it is true that the earnings aspect of IP is a verycapitalist problem, but living under capitalism as most of these people do requires earning some money and it is wrong to take that away for personal gain, and even if there were no money to be made there is the issue of people trying to get the stuff they make out there, and not crediting them means that stuff is no longer connected to them so only that one thing gets seen. Artists make art and want it to be observed.
For doxxing, a home isn't private property until you rent it to someone. A home is personal property and there is a difference. You can believe that you don't own the land that it is on, and that is reasonable imo, but the location where you live is personal information and yours to give or keep.
I love scoot always pronouncing it as s's'sniperwolf
But….
She’s hot 🥵
JK
Happy Halloween everyone 🎃
ignoring that she looks worse than an ai image of the "gamer girl" prompt,i never know how you can find a girl like that attractive,the moment she opens her mouth i want to be in a 5 km radius away from her like she's radioactive lmao.
I know you're joking, but I'm sure that's the justification her fans would unironically have.
Young girls idolise her because she's pretty and makes millions with hardly any effort. She's living the dream, and in many cases they'd clearly much rather aspire to that than to actually work hard to get an education and potentially never earn even a thousandth of the money, and get none of the adulation she gets. The reason OnlyFans is also now seen as an acceptable vocation for girls of an old enough age is clearly a development of that mindset - loads of people paying you money and telling you how great you are while the money rolls in.
I honestly think far more girls watch her than boys, even though the assumed response is always that it's boys simping for her.
This is all helped by an increasingly narcissistic attitude among young people, where they are led to believe that you should believe in yourself and your ability in spite of any criticism, and never accept responsibility or accountability. The worst part about this whole saga is that it has reinforced the idea that you should be confident in yourself and your actions - because let's face it, Sssniperwolf got away with it, and UA-cam even blamed them equally in their response. UA-cam's response to all this has been almost as irresponsible as hers, as they have basically said 'you can do whatever you like as long as you're pretty and make money'.
She and her fat lip would work as a jumpscare
Can't believe people are totally oblivious that her name is from Metal Gear.
I thought they based the Metal Gear Solid character off her?
all these years and i just noticed it 💀,honestly i was better without knowing that,having one of my favorite franchises associated with this disgusting person is almost as bad as the remasters that just came out.
I always thought it was weird, especially in the Dharr Mann videos where the little girls youtube name was Psycho Mantis. The references somehow feel sickly
Rip scoot
I don't think banning SSSniperwolf for a month would do anything. On one hand, this won't cripple her financially, but on the other hand, ...it won't cripple her financially. If it doesn't leave a long-lasting impact on her revenue, then she's not gonna care. If she's milking her channel as a content cow, then the only way to teach her it's immoral is to have it not be viable.
Shout out to Adums patience with friends like this lol
What's the "8 second clip" story?
Search for "UA-cam Demonetized Our Channel for an 8-Second Video" on this channel, uploaded 2 months ago.
This channel posted an 8 seconds video of a film calling it "worst jumpscare ever" and the channel got demonitzed for a month
@@alessandromieli7321 amazing
I love scoot so much, does he have a UA-cam channel?
Yes I do in fact.
i think the lips is makeup because you can see her without makeup and shes, normal, like plain as hell. i do think something is up but she do be doing a lot of make up
They change shape and size throughout her content, it’s like I’m watching a timelapse of textbook silicone displacement
Honestly I don't think yt is scared to ban SS if anything I'd assume they want to stall out untill Nov/December is over since her veiws along with the sheer amount of ads that get pushed comes out during the xmas season but that's just my opinion.
So... they are scared to ban SS because it would effect there bottom line?
It's going to bite YT hard if they do nothing because after a certain point they're going to get included in legal preceedings.
@@BlurredborderlinesPeople will tell you UA-cam/Google is untouchable, but it's not. I'm Australian and I saw them get taken to court by a loser politician we have here and they just folded. I reckon if enough mid-to-big creators get together and demand better they could equal the power of that politician easily. Hell, I'd even donate to it myself if it meant we could get some damn justice for once.