Hands-On: Grand Seiko Spring Drive SBGA467 Watch Review

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 60

  • @fabiocwilson
    @fabiocwilson 10 місяців тому +3

    Just bought my first GS!!! Can't wait to see it on my wrist!!!

  • @A_Dude_And_His_Watch78
    @A_Dude_And_His_Watch78 Рік тому +24

    I have the SBGA283 which is the champagne dial version of this. The only thing Rolex has over this is the name and bracelet. That said, the bracelet is not bad and Rolex cannot touch the movement or finish.

    • @lymon800
      @lymon800 Рік тому +1

      yep. i prefer this series specifically because the bracelet is more neutral and less gaudy. i don't really like the polished vertical lines on the inner links on most of the other models. as for the name -- people this side of the earth don't apologize for it.

    • @expertreviews1112
      @expertreviews1112 Рік тому

      no 283 is 39mm while the one in review is 40mm.. black version of your watch is actually SBGA285

    • @A_Dude_And_His_Watch78
      @A_Dude_And_His_Watch78 Рік тому

      @@expertreviews1112 right mine has been discontinued. Sorry I wasn't exact about the nomenclature, man.

    • @kaiserphoenix01
      @kaiserphoenix01 Рік тому +1

      Sorry no. I love GS but Rolex is miles ahead in movement design and architecture as well as the bracelet ergonomics of the watch. BUT it also costs 2 X the GS in most cases and generally not available. The spring drive is an innovative and unique movement to Seiko but it is NOT a purely mechanical watch and the accuracy is managed through a Quartz oscilator making it more quartz than mechanical. Thats not a bad thing as the accuracy trumps most mechanical watches. Just saying its different.

    • @A_Dude_And_His_Watch78
      @A_Dude_And_His_Watch78 Рік тому +1

      @@kaiserphoenix01 Wrong. The Grand Seiko movements are better finished and hand assembled. Rolex are not. Ergonomics are subjective. Also, it's a quartz regulated oscillator. It's a more unique and accurate movement. I've had Rolex and Omega. I prefer Grand Seiko.

  • @gg.komorebi
    @gg.komorebi Рік тому +5

    A very fine watch with a innovative high tec movement. For me, it's the best automatic movement in the world of watches.

  • @UltraDoug
    @UltraDoug 6 місяців тому +2

    This is now my 2nd GS. Thanks for helping me pull the trigger. 😎👍🏼

  • @grantr2279
    @grantr2279 9 місяців тому +4

    Just wanted to say that- I bought this watch after watching this review. Went on a secondary site and got an amazing deal on it due to the yen being so down.
    Thanks for the review- I can't believe there aren't more. Anyone who is looking for a Rolex OP- I can tell you this is a better watch. Purchased this one, turned down the Rolex and I'm so happy I did.

  • @นฤพนธ์จ้อยทองมูล

    Black dial is the best choice ! Spring Drive is gorgeous

  • @ebiedog
    @ebiedog Рік тому +3

    Thx for posting! Why arent there more vids from others? I guess this isnt a hype watch.

    • @MuhammadAbdullah-kx3kn
      @MuhammadAbdullah-kx3kn 4 місяці тому

      *Because of r4cism, it doesn't matter what they do; they can't stop the rise of the global south. After Seiko swept the observatory trials in 1967, the Swiss banned non-European brands from entering. Seiko never gave up. Seiko formed their own chronometer standards, which are better than COSC-certified. Their higher-end models are more accurate than their Swiss counterparts, at a lower price point.*

  • @expertreviews1112
    @expertreviews1112 Рік тому +2

    fantastic review!

  • @mattiaslindstrom8798
    @mattiaslindstrom8798 Рік тому +1

    why no micro-adjustments and no smaller sizes....

  • @daniahmed
    @daniahmed Місяць тому

    What's your wrist size?

  • @ebiedog
    @ebiedog 11 місяців тому +1

    I don’t agree with your statement about not having lume. The watch which this is compared to is the datejust and that has lume. Pilot, chronographs, and field watches have lume. Not only divers have lume or the need for lume, right?

    • @chelious1973
      @chelious1973 8 місяців тому +2

      The GS hands are so polished you can see the hands in the dark. You dont really need it.

    • @BearGryllsSpoofs
      @BearGryllsSpoofs 5 місяців тому

      @@chelious1973this 👆👆👆

  • @itsoonbedone
    @itsoonbedone 5 місяців тому

    What's the difference between this and sbga203 they look EXACTLY the same

    • @TheHypeCom
      @TheHypeCom 14 днів тому

      The case shape is different, the indexes have a different shape and the bracelet is different as well. But they are very similar at first glance, they are easy to confuse. Hope this helps :)

  • @kkatpheiz
    @kkatpheiz 5 місяців тому

    The real alternative for Rlolex, and feels even more rich!

  • @chelious1973
    @chelious1973 Рік тому +5

    This is the perfect GADA watch.

    • @ebiedog
      @ebiedog 11 місяців тому

      Minus lume

    • @chelious1973
      @chelious1973 8 місяців тому

      Doesnt need it. Trust me.

  • @abeness88
    @abeness88 6 місяців тому

    This watch is 6k in Vegas store!

    • @DarkstarDarth
      @DarkstarDarth 5 місяців тому

      I see it online for $3k …Vegas is a scam.

  • @oalaqeel
    @oalaqeel Рік тому

    I'm torn between this one and SBGA301 JDM.

  • @wparo
    @wparo 5 місяців тому

    Why make a name so industrial-sounding "this is my SBGA467", grand seiko put me off buying it just for that alone.

  • @kenjkbs
    @kenjkbs 2 місяці тому

    Grand Seiko is not a watchmaker. Seiko is.

  • @stoic900
    @stoic900 Рік тому +1

    A lot of ssss ssss sounds in the mic

    • @b0ssm4ch1n3
      @b0ssm4ch1n3 5 місяців тому

      Literally unbareable

  • @elkoyottt6807
    @elkoyottt6807 Рік тому +1

    Seiko “could rival the likes of Omega, Rolex AND TUDOR”?)))) it’s like “Lexus could rival the likes of BMW, Mercedes and Haval”)))

    • @gg.komorebi
      @gg.komorebi Рік тому +4

      Have you driven a Lexus? Have you ever worn a Grand Seiko? Certainly not, because otherwise you would not write something like this!

    • @elkoyottt6807
      @elkoyottt6807 Рік тому +1

      @@gg.komorebi you totally missed the idea, your emotions cloud your mind)

    • @diabloonline3893
      @diabloonline3893 Рік тому +1

      @@elkoyottt6807got him with the Star Wars reference aye my man

    • @elkoyottt6807
      @elkoyottt6807 Рік тому

      @@diabloonline3893 thanks, but neither Haval nor Tudor have nothing to do with stars or anything nice above. they can rather be compared with something disgusting under the feet, or more likely under the anus

    • @diabloonline3893
      @diabloonline3893 Рік тому

      @@elkoyottt6807 I basically know nothing about watches but I want one my dad said go look for a watch under 2000 dollars and it has to be a collectible watch that holds value and I’m finding nothing

  • @lymon800
    @lymon800 Рік тому +3

    i find it frustrating that western watch reviews make an effort to keep seiko as the "alternative", "candidate" to swiss watches. this bigotry has to stop.

  • @Owopoggies
    @Owopoggies Рік тому

    wa

  • @bikeshthami
    @bikeshthami Рік тому

    🇳🇵👍️🕘️

  • @steve8510
    @steve8510 Рік тому +3

    Pretty much everything said about Lume was wrong

    • @JonathanSanders458
      @JonathanSanders458 Рік тому +4

      Agreed, but I'll say that because the indices are so polished/shiny, you only need a tiny bit of light to tell the time on GS dials

    • @zouki42
      @zouki42 Рік тому

      Disagree. If you need light, go buy a casio

    • @steve8510
      @steve8510 Рік тому

      @@zouki42 Well everything needs light Zouki, including you, enjoy your Casio, they're exceptional value

    • @DaniPrays
      @DaniPrays Рік тому

      I was in the mil and my troops put a Geiger machine next to my glow in th dark watch like Lume….let’s just say I don’t buy watches with glow in the dark features anymore.

    • @steve8510
      @steve8510 Рік тому +1

      @@DaniPrays Tritium maybe if you wore it a 100 years but Lume these days is safe