Law of exponent telling untruth

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,3 тис.

  • @ad19932
    @ad19932 Рік тому +271

    Thank you Dear HC Verma Sir, you made our childhood proud. Your concepts of HC Verma book Part 1 & 2 were foundations of our thoughts.

    • @nithinsabu4808
      @nithinsabu4808 Рік тому +7

      Beta, batao tumhara JEE me kya rank he

    • @dakshmehta4498
      @dakshmehta4498 Рік тому +3

      @@nithinsabu4808 😂😂

    • @GoToMan
      @GoToMan Рік тому +1

      @@nithinsabu4808 AIR 101

    • @nithinsabu4808
      @nithinsabu4808 Рік тому

      @@GoToMan nice bro.
      I am 4016.

    • @GoToMan
      @GoToMan Рік тому +2

      @@nithinsabu4808 Haha, I was speculating about his rank tho. Never wrote JEE, went for Stanford straight away.

  • @Controller_Tales
    @Controller_Tales Рік тому +652

    What a mind-blowing concept...
    We studied this from younger classes but couldn't think about this....
    Genius sir 👍🔥🔥

    • @anshumansingh7726
      @anshumansingh7726 Рік тому +25

      Genius is the kid who thought about that question

    • @feynmankaku9039
      @feynmankaku9039 Рік тому +6

      ​@@anshumansingh7726 true

    • @alliswell6266
      @alliswell6266 Рік тому +8

      @@anshumansingh7726 I simply dealt the question by taking log both sides and mind my words this is a ridiculous doubt for a jee advanced aspirant.

    • @zthmotivation
      @zthmotivation Рік тому +1

      Sir ki badi respect karta hu but Jo ans sir ne diya hopefully that was not sufficient and was not as good !
      Base same hone par power equal ho jati hai agar difference of the power is zero
      Aur base same hone par powers ko equal nahi rakh skte hain is the difference is not zero
      Example 1 ki power 5 = 1 ki power 5 mai difference of 5-5=0 hence in this case we consider 5=5
      But if you take 1 ki power 5 = 1ki power 3 in this case clearly you can see the difference between the power is not zero hence you can't say 5=3
      I hope you understand it well now thank you ❤

    • @Chemistry-qp4ih
      @Chemistry-qp4ih 26 днів тому

      Bro i thought this like a month ago and I'm in 10th standard 😂 so i came for the answer today on UA-cam

  • @inspiringmuslim
    @inspiringmuslim Рік тому +138

    His simplicity is amazing. Best physics teacher and guide HC VERMA sir

    • @IndicHorseman
      @IndicHorseman Рік тому +4

      why you are learning science ? It is haram 😭😭🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @amsa1076
      @amsa1076 Рік тому +5

      ​@@IndicHorseman khud ke joke pe hass Raha hai.
      Study channel hai yeh. Aise comments kisi political channel or daal. Fir shayad kuch support mile. Lol

    • @harshit6045
      @harshit6045 Рік тому

      @@IndicHorsemanyour existence is haram

  • @bhanupratapsingh7320
    @bhanupratapsingh7320 Рік тому +3649

    Legends are noticing he is doing the question on almirah door 😂

  • @aditri-zz5se
    @aditri-zz5se Рік тому +19

    A teacher is considered an excellent teacher when they are able to explain such topics with utmost simplicity and don't just go with the "it is like this because it just is" excuse. Of course it goes without saying that this is one of the factors why HC Verma Sir is one of the most brilliant teachers of India.

  • @ICT.amit02
    @ICT.amit02 Рік тому +1434

    HC Verma sir always comes up with excellent explanations for problems. JEE ki prep nikali hai sir ki kitaab padhke ❣

  • @cinematicuniverse9654
    @cinematicuniverse9654 Рік тому +62

    Praising you sir
    No matter whatever the subject is
    You have a desent answer for all questions
    Big fan of your knowledge sir
    Learning from you

  • @sataniksil
    @sataniksil Рік тому +411

    It's been 3 yrs since I left physics ( as a subject 😆 ) , still I watch these videos and try to connect where I left that fascinating universe.
    Thank you sir ❤️

    • @SaketIsLIVE
      @SaketIsLIVE Рік тому

      IITian?

    • @sataniksil
      @sataniksil Рік тому +2

      @@SaketIsLIVE no bro...mei engineering mei nhi hu

    • @SaketIsLIVE
      @SaketIsLIVE Рік тому +2

      @@sataniksil ok

    • @AnilSharma-vo8ok
      @AnilSharma-vo8ok Рік тому +1

      ​@@sataniksil kya kr rhe ho ? Science field se ho ?

    • @sataniksil
      @sataniksil Рік тому +4

      @@AnilSharma-vo8ok integrated MSc. Agriculture Rural and Tribal Development

  • @oofsper
    @oofsper Рік тому +10

    Hats off sir! I am speechless, can't express in words that how big gentleman you are for giving the right and accurate education needed to this generation who is rotting their brains on shitty reels. God bless you sir!

  • @aliuzair3453
    @aliuzair3453 Рік тому +22

    His name will be written in golden words in the history of PHYSICS🔥

  • @kisuuu8086
    @kisuuu8086 Рік тому +17

    Love these explanations on fundametals, sometimes questions on some basic concept becomes more tricky & teasing than, questions involving tough calculation....Great Sir, Thankyou 🙏

  • @noracoachingclasses5870
    @noracoachingclasses5870 Рік тому +6

    Bahut hi gajab aur jis tarah se aap ne cupboard k door par samjhaya hai that's incredible I salute you for this. Maine apke bahut sare video nhi dekhe ab lag raha hai galti ki hai past me

  • @manish2532
    @manish2532 Рік тому +8

    Your style of teaching is heart touching sir 🙏🙏🙏

  • @atulmishra8425
    @atulmishra8425 Рік тому +8

    Sir ji board pe nhi darwaaje par hi explain kar dete hai ye hota hai guru prem 😍😍

  • @vectoranonymous4908
    @vectoranonymous4908 Рік тому +183

    Thank You Sir for clarifying this as I too was unaware of this until my Mathematics faculty at Allen taught me

  • @architad.4365
    @architad.4365 5 днів тому +1

    Amazingly simplistic teacher... eager for each explanation and teaching with immense patience: signs of a great teacher!

  • @akshatchauhan5708
    @akshatchauhan5708 Рік тому +3

    Aapki video dekh ke ek hi cheez nikalti hai zebaan se . Woww amagazine . Maaza aajata hai sir kyaa pyaare pyaare concept laate ho

  • @SudarshanBaurai
    @SudarshanBaurai Рік тому +30

    Thank you Prof. Verma 🙏 If you don't mind, I'll try to follow your style of teaching someday slowly removing the clouds to bring the clarity of established principles in maths and physics. You are simply superb SIR!

  • @dipankarrao1085
    @dipankarrao1085 Рік тому +1174

    Savage reply to all those who thinks that this is a question for checking IQ 😂😂😂😂

    • @dedicated2304
      @dedicated2304 Рік тому +30

      HCV SIR IS ❤
      CHARANSPARSH HCV SIR 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

    • @krishnamahawar319
      @krishnamahawar319 Рік тому +8

      Bro Chavanprash nahi charanprash

    • @dipankarrao1085
      @dipankarrao1085 Рік тому +33

      @@krishnamahawar319 bhai woh चरणस्पर्श bol raha hai

    • @dedicated2304
      @dedicated2304 Рік тому +21

      @@krishnamahawar319 apni aakho me to nhi dal lia chaman prash🤣🤣🤣
      Gajab log hai yaar

    • @anjugour9295
      @anjugour9295 Рік тому +3

      @@dedicated2304 bhai chavanprash nahi charansparsh

  • @tahirmdnumanlaskar2552
    @tahirmdnumanlaskar2552 Рік тому +6

    Got this formula in 9th standard but no teacher had ever explained to me like you did.
    Thanks for the answer!!
    Really enlightened!
    Maza aagaya sachme!

    • @aimiitbombay5129
      @aimiitbombay5129 15 днів тому

      I think they also have restrictions. Like a 9th grader don't know about logarithms

  • @ompandey9876
    @ompandey9876 Рік тому +6

    Legends do not come for solve his/her doubt they come for see his teaching style😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅

  • @jacksparrow8335
    @jacksparrow8335 Рік тому +2

    Others Just Tell About the rule is not applicable for base 1 but sir Explanation with Log is Amazing and Clear Thank You Sir

  • @nazirahmad2220
    @nazirahmad2220 Рік тому +16

    I have no words for such an educator 💐💐💓💓💐💐☪️☪️☪️☪️☪️

  • @valozyt
    @valozyt Рік тому +11

    This is what dedication looks like ❤
    Thank you Sir 🇮🇳🕉️

  • @playwithbio8749
    @playwithbio8749 Рік тому +12

    Thanks sir for giving us a new information about mathematics 👌👌

  • @pandadesignz5391
    @pandadesignz5391 Рік тому +6

    I feel blessed that I am able to learn from such a person

  • @sereneJoi
    @sereneJoi Рік тому +5

    Wonderful explanation sir....must appreciate the kid who came out with such a doubt 👍

  • @VrindamR
    @VrindamR Рік тому +3

    मेरे पास 7-8 दिनों से इस video का suggestion आ रहा था, लेकिन मैं यह सोचकर नहीं देख रहा था कि आप english में बताएँगे। हिंदी में बताने के लिए धन्यवाद सर🙏

  • @pankajahlawat2002
    @pankajahlawat2002 Рік тому +3

    Bilkul ekdum sahi hai 💯 , always take logarithm once when there is a exponent question. I also think like that method otherwise you can also try using Lambert W function.

  • @คyค-r2y
    @คyค-r2y Рік тому +6

    The fact that the legend is teaching on a wardrobe notice that handle..

  • @technogyan6982
    @technogyan6982 Рік тому +3

    Today i learn new concept on behalf of your knowledge.

  • @emdgt46mac81
    @emdgt46mac81 Рік тому

    Waah Sir ji waah 👌 kitne vistaar se iss prashn ka uttar diya aapne 🙏

  • @hrchd3400
    @hrchd3400 Рік тому +8

    True LEGEND…Doesn’t need even board to teach 🙏🙏

  • @junaidjamal8057
    @junaidjamal8057 Рік тому

    Beautiful explination indeed our lord is one and Only....lord deserves all praises and only to b worshiped alone ......there is no god but One and only One......who is the sole creator and rest is creation. .....

  • @malinishrivastava2505
    @malinishrivastava2505 Рік тому +884

    Sir why don't you start your own series of class 11th and 12th physics for JEE and NEET in which you will be clarifying all the concepts which even teachers fails to teach. It would be helpful for all those students who can't afford to get themselves enrolled in top coaching institutes and also for those who are struggling to understand the concept in the coaching because of the low level explanation given by teachers.
    Please look at gravity of this matter. A humble request to you from the bottom of my heart.

    • @ishanknaithani5610
      @ishanknaithani5610 Рік тому +208

      I don't think it is possible for sir to teach all jee/neet physics at this age . Also I think he does not teaches with any bounding on syllabus , he just want every student to understand core physics , irrelevance of any specific syllabus of any competetive exam..

    • @anjalii9095
      @anjalii9095 Рік тому +12

      Ye best h ✨

    • @xijinping3543
      @xijinping3543 Рік тому +108

      He doesn't like teaching for comeptitve papers, he likes teaching physics for interested

    • @studyboy74825
      @studyboy74825 Рік тому +50

      If you see his book concepts of physics, it isn't made for JEE and NEET. It was just for making everyone understand physics. We aspirants solve it because of its conceptual questions

    • @pyramis47
      @pyramis47 Рік тому

      @@xijinping3543 this more than anything else
      forget about jee for a while, and just enjoy what he teaches.
      (btw I have cleared jee studying in a tier 1 institute)

  • @DayanandKumar-zp8qf
    @DayanandKumar-zp8qf Рік тому +1

    Sir what a mind blowing explanation for the mind blowing question.
    I never thought this q.

  • @Hindhi-movie-Tv
    @Hindhi-movie-Tv Рік тому +3

    Sir you are greatest teacher of physics, u will be ideal for me forever

  • @kanpuriyagreat5341
    @kanpuriyagreat5341 Рік тому +1

    God itself teaching student🙏🙏🙏🙏
    Sadar pranam guru ji🙏🙏

  • @Cricedit006
    @Cricedit006 Рік тому +103

    Aaj class me mai genius banane ja raha hu🤫🤫🤫😅
    EDIT;:
    Maa me famous ho gaya maa😉

  • @manasdas5253
    @manasdas5253 Рік тому +1

    Perfect explanation to get rid of childhood ambiguity by sir🙏

  • @shreyanshtiwari0410
    @shreyanshtiwari0410 Рік тому +4

    Sir you are just God for us students... I'm too from kanpur and hope for getting into iit and meet you

  • @amaratvak6998
    @amaratvak6998 Рік тому +1

    Verma sahab, aapne bahut achha explain kiya exponential rule ko jis mein aapke anusaar base ki value agar 1 ke alaawa aur koi bhi ho toh bhi ye equation satisfy ho jaayegi. Sorry sir, aisa nahin hai. Agar base -1 bhi ho, tab bhi ye equation satisfy nahin ho paayegi. Example 👇
    (-1)^2 = (-1)^4
    => 2 = 4 (jo ki ganit ke niyaanusaar sahi nahin hai!!). Yaani ke base -1 bhi nahin ho sakta!!!! Isi tarah agar aap ghaur karen, toh base ki power 0, 1 aur --1 ye teeno nahin ho sakti, warna equation satisfy nahin ho paayegi.

  • @Chahatjoshii
    @Chahatjoshii Рік тому +5

    Amazing Sir ❤️❤️
    My respect to you increases day by day 🙏🙏

  • @allright2283
    @allright2283 6 днів тому +1

    what a time to be alive, listening to him teach directly!

  • @shyamkishorkumar7791
    @shyamkishorkumar7791 Рік тому +9

    Power of Bihari ठेकुआ ( पकवान) sir

    • @Xxtylis
      @Xxtylis 2 місяці тому

      😅😅

  • @Code_WithUttam
    @Code_WithUttam 4 дні тому

    who are the 99 people who disliked this video of such a great man. Hats off to you sir!!

  • @earthianprithviwasi
    @earthianprithviwasi Рік тому +4

    Can’t believe it was so simple. Thankyou sir!

  • @bgmi7120
    @bgmi7120 Рік тому +2

    The thing is we can make jokes about them, but the effort and the happy enthusiasm he is expressing, are missing in our generation, its if we are not interested, just respect his concern!

  • @denkid4478
    @denkid4478 Рік тому +21

    The one-one property of exponential function requires the base to be>1. Since when base is 1, the exponential function will map each point in its domain to 1.

    • @aditri-zz5se
      @aditri-zz5se Рік тому +2

      not >1 but simply "not equal to" 1, since it can be a negative value as well.

    • @denkid4478
      @denkid4478 Рік тому

      @@aditri-zz5se yup

  • @hermionegranger3513
    @hermionegranger3513 Рік тому +1

    Thank you sir... the question is too interesting and your explanation is too beautiful.... Pranam..🙇‍♀️

  • @mathdoctor
    @mathdoctor Рік тому +15

    Sir, you are the inspirations for many like us.

  • @rajdeepmaity3007
    @rajdeepmaity3007 26 днів тому

    Sir your concept is way beyond everything..so talented you are sir..pranam🙏

  • @vishaldixit5176
    @vishaldixit5176 Рік тому +3

    Brilliant que and mind-blowing answer

  • @tgx6288
    @tgx6288 Рік тому +1

    kitne acche se samjaya he sir , thankyou so much ❤❤🤯🤯🙏🙏

  • @javedansari9359
    @javedansari9359 Рік тому +10

    Hello Sir,
    Good to see you again.
    Myself Javed Ansari, I am a Maths Professor and teach 11th, 12th Maths include JEE MAINS & Advance.
    I would like to enhance the statement.
    "Since bases are the same their exponents would be equal, if the bases are not 1, -1, zero and infinity."

  • @Gulshan.exception99
    @Gulshan.exception99 Рік тому +1

    Thank God (also UA-cam algorithm), Mujhe solution mil gaya, mera dost na khud pata tha aur mujhe kafi dino se pareshan kar raha na tha ab uske muh pe solution dunga 🤣🤣...
    Also Thanks for HC Verma sir...🙏🙏

  • @hellohimanshuiiitnagpur8421
    @hellohimanshuiiitnagpur8421 Рік тому +2

    This kind of innovative things only hc Verma sir can think 😅.

  • @X3NOSAMA
    @X3NOSAMA 8 днів тому

    Such a great concept building ability you have sir. Thank you so much. You are a really great teacher❤

  • @raushan18010
    @raushan18010 Рік тому +4

    वाह sir आपने क्या concept बता दिये।
    Sir aap maths ka kuchh course
    Ya concept wala वीडियो UA-cam par ya koi website par start karte......... .
    Class zero to higher tak.🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @PurabDas-zj5xt
    @PurabDas-zj5xt 12 днів тому

    HC Verma sir is so simple man in terms of life style but as well as so genius 😊😊

  • @GAURAVGUPTA-xw1xf
    @GAURAVGUPTA-xw1xf Рік тому +18

    (-1)²=(-1)⁴, so, 2=4
    0³=0⁸, so, 3=8
    For bases -1 and 0, we also need to take care.

    • @prathamkalgutkar7538
      @prathamkalgutkar7538 Рік тому +2

      yes base needs to be greater than 0 and never be 1 for this property to be true

    • @GAURAVGUPTA-xw1xf
      @GAURAVGUPTA-xw1xf Рік тому

      Yes Sir, For definition of exponential function and it's inverse logarithmic function base should be positive and not equal to 1.

    • @GAURAVGUPTA-xw1xf
      @GAURAVGUPTA-xw1xf Рік тому

      @Mr. IITian
      Yes, that's the limitation Sir.
      Explanation here considers only positive bases.

    • @GAURAVGUPTA-xw1xf
      @GAURAVGUPTA-xw1xf Рік тому

      We should understand that exponential functions are defined and monotonic on real set only when bases are positive and not equal to 1.

    • @k_wl
      @k_wl Рік тому +4

      there is a simple answer to this, correlation does not mean causation, in your case, the reason why (-1) to the 2nd power and 4th power are equal is because they both equal -1, not because 2 equals 4, but if you want to go indepth for the proof (which is not so simple) , you have to go to a complex world since the logarithm of a negative number is not defined in the real world, see this
      -1 on the complex plane is at an angle of 180 degrees or PI from the starting plane, while you can use that angle in the euler's formula, you have to notice that for these specific numbers -1, 1, i and -i, you can go around 360 degrees or 2PI around the plane and end up at the same point, so for (-1)^2 to (-1)^4 it is just off by an angle of 2nPI where n is an integer, theyre the same number but they have "different" angles
      for 0, the log function is undefined as no number to a power can equal 0 other than 0, you can try to tackle this in the form of limits, since the limit as x-->0+ of Ln(x) is --infinity, you can look at it as
      0^2 = 0^4
      take the natural log on both sides
      2 Ln(0) = 4 Ln(0)
      using ln(0) as -infinity,
      2 * -infinity = 4 * -infinity, hence
      -infinity = -infinity, so it is true and not because 2 = 4
      if you think about it, its like solving an equation,
      lets say 4x = 2x, then you move like terms to one side and get
      4x - 2x = 0, factor out an x
      x(4-2) = 0, here we cant just say 4-2=0 as that just doesnt make sense, so only other possibility is that x = 0
      hope this helps :)

  • @quantumacademy4565
    @quantumacademy4565 Рік тому +1

    Sir ko koti koti pradam.. proud to be a physics teacher..

  • @D2X_YTR
    @D2X_YTR Рік тому +3

    One of the Great teacher ❤️❤️❤️

  • @aman_sharma..
    @aman_sharma.. Рік тому +1

    Well explained guru jee..a lots of love and respect from bihar😊

  • @aditideka1947
    @aditideka1947 Рік тому +8

    Sir you are a legend!💗😊

  • @asmit_plays
    @asmit_plays Рік тому

    Kya baat hai sir.. log ka explanation bahut zaruri tha. Thanks a lot

  • @RohitSingh-xq9ep
    @RohitSingh-xq9ep Рік тому +5

    This is how a student is supposed to be taught by his/her teacher.
    But we all know how our teacher teach us in schools.

  • @kingofgold9627
    @kingofgold9627 Рік тому

    Wow perfect explanation first time i saw your video and just say wow
    Guru ji zabardast

  • @atanubiswas.5098
    @atanubiswas.5098 Рік тому +16

    Respected Sir,
    I'm a 12th class student from Nadia, West Bengal. After taking lessons from this video, I became very excited to know why *0! =1* and it's physical significance and it's role in our nature. Sir , kindly explain this.

    • @jancythomas1316
      @jancythomas1316 Рік тому +9

      A factorial of a number "n" is defined as
      n!=n×(n-1)×(n-2)...×2×1
      By this definition we can say that
      n!=n×(n-1)!
      Therefore
      (n-1)!=n!/n
      Putting n=1 we get,
      (1-1)!=1!/1
      Therefore
      0!=1
      Hence proved

    • @rockybhai975
      @rockybhai975 Рік тому

      ua-cam.com/video/Tib9uLg_-jw/v-deo.html
      Here I find a video related to your question

  • @yashj8238
    @yashj8238 Рік тому

    sir koi sawaal nai banta aapke kitab ka kuch samajh nahi aata phir bhi aap great ho.. pranam

  • @Anukalp_Tripathy
    @Anukalp_Tripathy Рік тому +25

    Respected Sir
    My name is Anukalp and study in class 10. I have a doubt in physics in optics. We know that when a monochromatic light passes through prism it does not disperse and simply got deviated. But when a monochromatic green light (let assume the light source be laser beam) when passes through prism you will be astonished to see that inside the prism the green light will be (refracted) reddish-orange in colour and the emergent ray will be as usual green. Sir you can check also yourself by doing the experiment.
    Sir, my question is that why the monochromatic green light is visible reddish orange in colour.
    I will be very pleased to get the answer from you

    • @srinivasramanujan9204
      @srinivasramanujan9204 Рік тому +16

      Since you are in 10th right now, the explanation might be a bit complex for you, but I shall try to keep it as simple as possible.
      When you pass light through prism, a part of it gets *REFRACTED* and the other gets *REFLECTED*
      It means some energy of the photons(small packets of light energy;massless particles) gets radiated out while some remains in the prism.
      Energy is related to Frequency of light as
      E=hf [h is a constant]
      =>E=(hc)/W [c is speed of light and W is the wavelength]
      f=c/W from the relation velocity=frequency×wavelength
      From E=(hc)/W
      When E decreases, Wavelength of light increases in same proportion, and since wavelength of light decreases it changes its color.
      Hope it helps

    • @vishalratna2703
      @vishalratna2703 Рік тому +1

      You need to understand that whenever a ray of light refracts, it's wavelength increases. To understand the reason you also need to know that frequency of a ray of light only and only depends on its source and it doesn't change throughout its journey, and you also need to know that speed of light decreases when it enters a medium. Therefore by the formula V=fλ if the speed of light changes in entering another medium then lambda(i.e. wavelength) should also change and your frequency remains constant through this process. Therefore, before refraction f1 = V1/λ1,
      After refraction f2= V2/λ2.
      Since f1=f2 therefore,
      V1/λ1=V2/λ2, therefore,
      V2 x λ1
      -----------= λ2
      V1

    • @bharat9287
      @bharat9287 Рік тому

      10 students should learn first.. how can we contradict on this topic... Hope u get it. Now learn as it is.

  • @NaeemIrum
    @NaeemIrum Рік тому

    بہترین۔
    Salute to you sir.

  • @aquamoon19
    @aquamoon19 Рік тому +3

    Sir please answer this question🙏🏻 -What is the difference between total power and equivalent power with respect to an electric circuit (because both of them have different formular with respect to series/parallel combination of the circuit)?

  • @ark23iu
    @ark23iu 14 днів тому

    Ye sir ekdam se viral kese hone lage social media prr pehle to kabhi inki videos nhi dekhin or ab continue inki hi videos aati rehti h ❤❤❤

  • @ImSamD18
    @ImSamD18 Рік тому +13

    Amazing explanation sir ! I have a question though (not related the topic of the video) when the JEE advance paper is set what sort of qualities are being searched in a student ? I always had this question sir .

  • @miscellaneous.12
    @miscellaneous.12 Рік тому

    Love you sir, kya jawab hai pure rules theorem ke sath

  • @gopalmohapatro6697
    @gopalmohapatro6697 Рік тому +5

    With your written book named "the concept of physics" there are many memories are attached with me I have no that much capacity to bring out I bring it from a senior of mine after that I started my journey of physics from there I started to make follow your books directly which students usually prefer after make clear their concepts of theory for practice problems
    There was many numbers of sleepless night with that book whenever I read it I was found myself on a other world of physics
    Even I ignored many time other subjects like chemistry when I being much attached to physics
    But thing is that many of my friends make laugh at me just because all over the night I stay outside the room that which was provided on my hostel just because nobody could make disturb in between while I study or practice problem
    I was think over either the sleepless night will make pay me or not
    But at last it make me pay for that sleepless night at 1st attempt I clear jeemain now I am student of btech 1st year of chemical engineering
    If that day I will not choose my own road then their should be no a single change I could found between their and my life
    They all are laughing at me because I was different from them
    But I just make smile on their because they all are same

  • @lakhaihansdah1269
    @lakhaihansdah1269 Рік тому

    His smiling face is so attractive to the listener... 😅😊😊😊..
    Great Sir. ❤❤

  • @Spectre021
    @Spectre021 Рік тому +6

    Sir just proved that Math is not just a subject, it's art.

    • @raghavkapoor5663
      @raghavkapoor5663 Рік тому +1

      He's good, except that he couldn't paint the entire picture.
      Base = 1 is just one of the two exceptions to this rule.
      The other being Base = 0
      0^1=0^2 but 1 is not equal to 2.

    • @FlameTaxi
      @FlameTaxi Рік тому

      @@raghavkapoor5663 "Since bases are the same their exponents would be equal, if the bases are not 1, -1, zero and infinity."

  • @TiwariAcademy-eh4qr
    @TiwariAcademy-eh4qr Рік тому

    what a brilliant brain god had given to H C Verma sir and thank you for the best explanation sir 💯💯💯💯

  • @learnANDgroww3092
    @learnANDgroww3092 Рік тому +10

    Hlw HCV sir.
    I'm a class 9th student,I want to ask a question ,it is running my mind all day.
    Q . Can light be independent of heat(any kind of heat) ??
    Help me to know this , sir
    Huge respect to you nd your contribution!😊

    • @ankushupman1505
      @ankushupman1505 Рік тому +2

      LIGHT IS A FORM OF ENERGY WHICH GIVES US THE SENSATION OF SIGHT. Its a form of energy ,likewise heat is also a form of energy . wherever there is a dissipation of energy ,it is compulsory heat generation will be there, suppose you run for 1km, you will find yourself sweating due to heat generated in your body. light is too ,has the useful energy + unavailable energy conversion. THE UNAVAILABLE ENERGY IS THE HEAT ENERGY IN CASE OF BULB.
      (H=i SQUARE RT ) IN CASE OF WATER HEATER ,THE USEFUL ENERGY IS HEAT ENERGY.
      IF YOU SEE EM WAVES (LIGHT IS ALSO AN EM WAVE) , THERE IS DISSIPATION OF HEAT ENERGY IN THE FORM OF RADIATION.
      SO LIGHT,HEAT,SOUND,CHEMICAL OR ANY FORM OF ENERGY IS INTERELATED, REMEMBER IT CAN NEITHER BE CREATED NOR DESTROYED ONLY IT CHANGES ITS FORM.
      IN NUCLEAR REACTIONS TOO THERE IS SPLITTING OF URANIUM ATOM WHICH GENERATE HEAT ,THAT IS USED TO PRODUCE STEAM WHICH RUNS THE TURBINE TO GENERATE ELECRICITY.
      OR IF YOU BOMBARD ANY RAYS THERE WILL BE HEAT GENERATION.
      SO MY DEAR FREIND ,THERE IS EXCHANGE OF ENERGY EVERYWHERE, THE BIG EXAMPLE IS SUN ( NUCLEAR REACTION HAPPENS THERE) RADIATING SOLAR FLARES AND EM WAVES WHICH GETS TRAPEED AT NORTH AND SOUTH POLES TO FORM BEAUTIFUL AURORA . HOPE YOU UNDERSTAND THIS EXPLANATION, WELCOME.

    • @rajan8516
      @rajan8516 Рік тому

      @@ankushupman1505 awesome!

    • @roysondsa2971
      @roysondsa2971 Рік тому +1

      ​@@ankushupman1505 man u r a genius🔥

    • @learnANDgroww3092
      @learnANDgroww3092 Рік тому +1

      Thanks bro..now i got I ☺️!

    • @learnANDgroww3092
      @learnANDgroww3092 Рік тому +1

      @@ankushupman1505 hey , i have a another question. Plzz help me to get answer of this: Weigh of a dry cell decrease when it get dead ?

  • @JyotiGupta-dx3cd
    @JyotiGupta-dx3cd Рік тому

    Genius sir after long time I see this type of teaching

  • @RohitSingh-xq9ep
    @RohitSingh-xq9ep Рік тому +3

    Sir you are a legend.

  • @VivekSingh-gu3sv
    @VivekSingh-gu3sv Рік тому

    Hats off to to sir...
    Such an easy concept with unpredictable explanation.

  • @PKP446
    @PKP446 Рік тому +3

    1/infinity=0 then 1=infinity*0 =0
    But 1not equal to 0
    Sir please solve this problem

    • @Sachh247
      @Sachh247 Рік тому

      0•infinity is indeterminate form
      This is not equal to zero

  • @aayushprasad314
    @aayushprasad314 Рік тому +2

    A simple amazing explanation sir ...

  • @stealthghost7658
    @stealthghost7658 Рік тому +3

    uncle ji almirah ka darwaaza kharaab karne ke baad aunty ji se maar khaane waale hai 😂😂

  • @akashkumarkole6408
    @akashkumarkole6408 Рік тому

    I'm overwhelmed 🥰. I respect you sir from deep inside my heart.

  • @WiseMysticalTree33
    @WiseMysticalTree33 Рік тому +5

    Pranam Sir
    my question is that if other planets and celestial objects are moving around sun so why don't they mix with the sun because sir according to laws every heavy object attracts other objects which has smaller mass than himself and many teachers illustrates the moving of earth around sun in a net where sun is in the center and the object around it revolves and after some time it gets attracted to the object(sun) sir please clear my doubt every teacher rejected this question from starting and sir i have very much hope that you will definitely look up to this.

    • @prathamkalgutkar7538
      @prathamkalgutkar7538 Рік тому

      all planets and celestial bodies have constant velocities and they thus follow a stable orbit around the sun which is why they don't fall into sun, now unless mass of bodies or velocity of bodies change this path will not change however there are more factors in real life

    • @adityamukherjee2207
      @adityamukherjee2207 Рік тому

      @Pratham Kalgutkar You can also visualize this using the potential energy graph of earth wrt sun.

    • @krishnamahawar319
      @krishnamahawar319 Рік тому

      Bro In Advanced Physics You wil learn a concept that is due to resultant force on them .. They Got A Velocity In tangential direction of sun and one component make the Earth revolve and other one balances the sun ☀️ Gravitational pull .. So it's not able to get pulled by sun but I think If a very heavy Force Will be On the Side of sun will be applied .. That You think will take place but It Can Happen Because If some large Body come near our earth so it will take earth toward it attract it very heavily so We will not able to so sun's side .. I hope it's clear you More I will be happy if sir gives a beautiful explanation on it ...

    • @ThePhysicsTrain
      @ThePhysicsTrain Рік тому +1

      @Pratham Kalgutkar, what you've mentioned is not right. You've written that all planets and celestial bodies have constant velocities. They DON'T. At no point of time is their velocity constant. At every point of time, their speed and direction is changing when rotating around heavier bodies.
      Now, coming to the question of why doesn't Earth fall into the Sun, as demonstrated by the Earth-Sun model in a lab. The answer is this: It will, if there is dissipation of energy and sufficient time. These 2 conditions are met when that lab demonstration is done. Taking Sun at the centre of observation, there's no torque on Earth due to the force applied due to Sun's gravity(as gravity is a central force), therefore conservation of angular momentum can be taken into consideration. Therefore the Earth continues to revolve around the Sun. But there are other planets in Solar system and there's whole milky way galaxy.. they do exert force in various directions on Earth and Sun. It is a possibility that one day, very very far in the future, Earth could spiral in the Sun, or maybe not. Maybe it's orbit will change like the moon's orbit is changing. Earth's moon's orbit is changing every moment. There was a time in very distant past that moon was very close to Earth. And it WILL happen that moon will forever be gone from Earth's orbit never to be seen anymore.

  • @mohdazim4328
    @mohdazim4328 Рік тому +1

    Brilliant explanation by legendry personality 😘❤️

  • @chesstricksandtraps1
    @chesstricksandtraps1 Рік тому +3

    Sir what will happen if the base is 0?
    Where will the contradiction arise if zero is the base in the following equation i.e.
    0^2 = 0
    0^3 = 0
    Thus,
    0^2=0^3
    ---> 2 = 3 {Because of same bases}

    • @prathamkalgutkar7538
      @prathamkalgutkar7538 Рік тому

      log 0 is undefined so base cannot be 0, the base always have to be greater than 0 and base cannot be 1

    • @chesstricksandtraps1
      @chesstricksandtraps1 Рік тому

      @@prathamkalgutkar7538 Oh, I get it now
      Thanks :)

  • @onestoplocation
    @onestoplocation Рік тому +1

    Best explanation for this would be basically 5^² means 5 multiplied twice but if we see in a way 5^¹ should mean 5 multiplied once but multiplied to whom? Simple answer is 1. So 5^³ is 5 multiplied thrice to 1. So 5^0 means 5 not multiplied at all to 1. Hence 5^0 means 1. Like wise 1^0 means one not multiplied to 1 so leaving us with just a 1

    • @athvii
      @athvii Рік тому +1

      Cool! 💟

  • @sanatani0014
    @sanatani0014 Рік тому +3

    Albert Einstein abhi bhi jinda hai kya 😂

  • @panwala703
    @panwala703 Рік тому +1

    Great sir very very great guru
    HC Verma sir is real guru of physics

  • @adityahubhay
    @adityahubhay 13 днів тому +3

    bro is not sandeep sir 😎😎

  • @Zubair9847
    @Zubair9847 Рік тому

    Wow, i watched 1st time HC sir ,, his basis of explanation is outstanding ❤❤

  • @SatyamKumar-gy3tl
    @SatyamKumar-gy3tl Рік тому +7

    Ham soche 2023 mai Albert Einstein kaha se aa gaya 😂😂

  • @sanatanibhakt18
    @sanatanibhakt18 Рік тому +1

    What a teaching style sir🤩🤩 i am big fan sir

  • @anamikadebnath7232
    @anamikadebnath7232 Рік тому +3

    Wait is he teaching in cupboard? Huge respect 🙏

    • @Rahul_K....251
      @Rahul_K....251 Рік тому

      Yes.....He is writing on that, Great Respect to him🙏

  • @abeerkale566
    @abeerkale566 Рік тому

    Wow!!! Absolutely brilliant explanation
    In school e are never taught explanation to such axioms