I just buy the GBD about 3 weeks ago and before I have the apple watch; in my opinion i'm very satisfied with the casio, the gps running very good, the heart rate also, swimming... the night mode...; the truth is a very competitive watch. The battery support 1 week training 2h per day. I'm going to put the apple watch to sell. I bought the casio vs the garmin for the design and casio seems more durable to me. All the best!
@@MichaelCDavis1 I found the notification good enough though. But the GPS acquisition takes 10 minutes, maybe I should successfully acquire the GPS before I start running. But my previous 5 years old polar don't need that, I just run and it keep track my path right where I start.
Excellent video! I used to wear my Casio G-Shock GX-56GB, then switched to an Apple Watch, then Garmin Fenix 6X….now I’m thinking of another Casio G-Shock…or the Garmin Instinct Tactical 2X Solar…..I’m in a similar dilemma!
Get the Instinct 2X! I would but it's bigger than a G-Shock so I'll stick with the Suunto for now. Though I'm tempted to downgrade to a Suunto Traverse Alpha. I found that I don't need the heart rate and blood oxygen thing 🙄
@@alphonsecadieux6127I have the Fenix 6X and what I’ve learned over the years with it (and my previous 3-4 years with an Apple Watch), I don’t use 80% of the features. I did track workouts while working out but have NEVER gone back through all the data. I’m tired of all the alerts on my wrist. Sometimes I like the step counter but my phone does that. I like the compass feature and would like that without a phone.
I am stuck between the new rangemen and the instinct 2 solar tactical. I was wanting feedback on the longevity of the Garmins. Seems like in several comment sections I have seen comments where Garmins only last a year or two. Any help in that area is appreciated. Thanks.
I have a Garmin tactix delta. And the battery life has gone down considerably after years of use. It’s normal and to be expected but I dropped 1k on the watch and i expected the battery life to be longer/stronger
I like that garmin gives you the option to use the wings or the straps. I know casio is doing integrations with polar but I've had polar watches before and really found the data and interface lacking compared to Garmin. Also I really feel like companies need to fully invest in a direction otherwise they drop support eventually. The polar I had had android wear integration but then after a while they stop updating and it gets dropped. And price wise...Even the instinct 2X solar is much cheaper than the casio. has more features ( in terms of tracking activities) and my previous garmin lasted for years so I know I can trust them for support and even for walk-in centers.
Hi. Thanks for the review. Which one is better for everyday use no distractions like smartwatch, gym workout and some trail running? Thank you. (I love G-Shock)
@@alphonsecadieux6127 thank you. I bought the Casio. I love it!! Tracking is very good, very good looking, and I don't have a smartphone(watch) in my wrist
garmin is better hands down BUT i have a weak spot for gshocks, they are just way cooler. it also looks better. the instinct looks cheap. i own an instinct 1 and an instinct descent G1 solar the solar display looks too dark though i think im gonna get the h2000 as well, they look sick
They definitely do look awesome. One thing I found odd though is that neither Suunto or Casio calculate the amount of stairs climbed per day...which for me, personally, is one of my favorite things. I did buy a Fenix 7s so you can expect a review of it in the coming days!
@@bubapsp the algorithm is licensed from Polar buy Casio for use in their watches. Casio didn't try and make their own health algorithm because it's much cheaper and easier to just license it. The benefit of the Polar algorithm being that Casio can update it with an over-the-air update.
Great and informative video. I’m torn between these two watches considering that my use would be everyday both at school and for fitness like gym for what would you say it’s better? Because I like the g schock more( I don’t really need all of the better tech that the garmin have) , but it might just look a little bit too big considering I’m an 18 y.o. What do you say?
If you're not deep into all of the specific activities of the garmin, I'd go with the casio. It's cool for an 18 year old and will and stands appart from the rest of the crowd. It is big but doesn't wear that big, as it's not bigger than most g-shocks out there! But if you want better tracking, better support and community, go with the instinct 2.
Did you consider the DWH 5600? I prefer the instinct screen customization to the GBD - if the DWH 5600 had been out it would have been a touch choice, love the g shock square with MIP and solar and fitness
Great comparison video! Well done! 👍✌👏💪Guys! Who's heart is covered by G-Shock armor :Đ The Rangeman GPR-H1000 is coming next year. It will be a real beast! I recommend it to all to your attention!
Incomparable. G-Shock is not near Garmin in terms of features. It is also millitary tested. G-Shocks is also used in millitary because they are rough, and cheap. If they break you just buy a new one. Casio always lacks functions and then sell a new one with one more function. Garmin puts ut all in the watch.
Nowadays you'll find a lot of Garmin and Suunto in the wild. Recruits usually wears Timex or Casio watches, definitely. But I wouldn't call a 400$ casio cheap
I love casio gshock and wanted this GBD so much, but after owning the instinct 2 solar for 18 months, i think its the best alround and so wont buy the casio.
The Garmin is definitely to established model to go with. That being said, let's say you use the Casio for step counts, sleep tracking, heart rate readings and not the GPS functionality, then I'd go Casio for the simple fact that it's slightly cheaper. I also grew tired of all the options available for customization on Garmin's end which...they won't tell you but the more options you have on the screen, the more battery it consume. That, Casio is far ahead. It's a no BS, get the jog done type of watch.
@@alphonsecadieux6127 interesting. I bought the casino, looks good to me, but gps acquisition takes several minutes. Also, 4 days have passed, still no sleep data. I also miss the torch function of the Garmin. I should have bought the Garmin, but more expensive though, and I like the look of Casio a bit more. Let me check you Suunto vertical. May I ask you why you would have choose the Casio?
What I like about the Casio despite of it's flaws is that it is what it is, no fancy gadget or screen, just plain information. I would've loved it to have at least the breadcrumbs features of the GPR1000 BUT it's still a rugged, long lasting watch. With both the DWH5600 and GBDH2000, the sleep tracker took more than the "2 nights" threshold to start tracking too. And between Garmin and Suunto "flashlight" (Excluding the ones with actual LED light)…the Suunto wins. Way brighter. I'm actually looking into getting an older Suunto Traverse Alpha. I found not to be using the heart rate sensor as much as I thought.
@@alphonsecadieux6127 thanks a lot for the detail reply. I didn't know there are health watches other than instinct will have torch, let me check out the Suunto.
@@alphonsecadieux6127 but you could get the 80s Casio look and feel with a quick trip to Amazon. Example currently rocking the Fibit Sense with great notifications, answering calls from my wrist, Alexa OR google assistant, sleep tracking, weather, text reply, with a cheap Supcase or other case/band. Casio sucks at all listed above.
@nickvin7447 I could argue that Garmin is 100% dedicated to fitness and ruggedness. Much as Garmin per say BUT there's a lot of people out there that don't want music control or multiple faces or widgets.
I would keep the Casio. One perk of connectivity is the ability to reply to texts and messages. Silly, I know, but the Garmin envision is more favorable to smartwatch features. But the Casio is easy to wear, use and get used too. It also looks pretty good!
@@alphonsecadieux6127 Yes, a stroke of disbelief, this casio looks good on anyones wrist(unless you wear it over a coat). Like people in the half of previous century worn watches with 34mm diameter, a decade ago it was closer to 38-42mm and now this. I am really proud of our cardio-vascular diseases progression in the last couple decades.
Maybe they do for you but quite honestly, I can see why a legion of people love it. Garmin is amazing with their technology but it is a bit overwhelming for most common mortals
I own a GBD H 2000 since may 2023 and I'm very happy and satisfied with it. It's an amazing watch and Casio recently upgraded some sport functions.
Like it was mentioned already, the difference between the two is down to user preferences and actual use of their watches. 🤜🤛
I just buy the GBD about 3 weeks ago and before I have the apple watch; in my opinion i'm very satisfied with the casio, the gps running very good, the heart rate also, swimming... the night mode...; the truth is a very competitive watch. The battery support 1 week training 2h per day. I'm going to put the apple watch to sell. I bought the casio vs the garmin for the design and casio seems more durable to me. All the best!
Casio still has a big learning curve ahead but if they keep innovating they'll become really competitive! 🤜🤛
Noticed you didn't mention the awful notifications and other smart features that casio sucks at.
@@MichaelCDavis1 they really do suck but this is not a watch aimed at that customer base. They made that clear from the get go
@@MichaelCDavis1 I found the notification good enough though. But the GPS acquisition takes 10 minutes, maybe I should successfully acquire the GPS before I start running. But my previous 5 years old polar don't need that, I just run and it keep track my path right where I start.
@@paulsochinfanyes I do warm ups while the gps is connecting..
Excellent video! I used to wear my Casio G-Shock GX-56GB, then switched to an Apple Watch, then Garmin Fenix 6X….now I’m thinking of another Casio G-Shock…or the Garmin Instinct Tactical 2X Solar…..I’m in a similar dilemma!
Get the Instinct 2X! I would but it's bigger than a G-Shock so I'll stick with the Suunto for now. Though I'm tempted to downgrade to a Suunto Traverse Alpha. I found that I don't need the heart rate and blood oxygen thing 🙄
@@alphonsecadieux6127I have the Fenix 6X and what I’ve learned over the years with it (and my previous 3-4 years with an Apple Watch), I don’t use 80% of the features. I did track workouts while working out but have NEVER gone back through all the data. I’m tired of all the alerts on my wrist. Sometimes I like the step counter but my phone does that. I like the compass feature and would like that without a phone.
The 2x tactical is awesome. I habe had it for about 2 months and still says 38 days. I work outside so your results may differ
@@MyFootball09 Thinking to get one. How frequently during the day time is synced?
@@lefterismic3978 I would say constantly. The time is always the same as my phone
I am stuck between the new rangemen and the instinct 2 solar tactical. I was wanting feedback on the longevity of the Garmins. Seems like in several comment sections I have seen comments where Garmins only last a year or two. Any help in that area is appreciated. Thanks.
Go with the new rangeman!
I have a Garmin tactix delta. And the battery life has gone down considerably after years of use. It’s normal and to be expected but I dropped 1k on the watch and i expected the battery life to be longer/stronger
Take garmin❤❤❤
I like that garmin gives you the option to use the wings or the straps. I know casio is doing integrations with polar but I've had polar watches before and really found the data and interface lacking compared to Garmin. Also I really feel like companies need to fully invest in a direction otherwise they drop support eventually. The polar I had had android wear integration but then after a while they stop updating and it gets dropped. And price wise...Even the instinct 2X solar is much cheaper than the casio. has more features ( in terms of tracking activities) and my previous garmin lasted for years so I know I can trust them for support and even for walk-in centers.
I agree, Casio are a niche market of their own
Hi. Thanks for the review. Which one is better for everyday use no distractions like smartwatch, gym workout and some trail running? Thank you. (I love G-Shock)
Definitely the Casio. Although less thorough for some activities, for the regular Joe, it does the trick
@@alphonsecadieux6127 thank you. I bought the Casio. I love it!! Tracking is very good, very good looking, and I don't have a smartphone(watch) in my wrist
garmin is better hands down BUT i have a weak spot for gshocks, they are just way cooler. it also looks better. the instinct looks cheap.
i own an instinct 1 and an instinct descent G1 solar
the solar display looks too dark though
i think im gonna get the h2000 as well, they look sick
They definitely do look awesome. One thing I found odd though is that neither Suunto or Casio calculate the amount of stairs climbed per day...which for me, personally, is one of my favorite things.
I did buy a Fenix 7s so you can expect a review of it in the coming days!
Yes Polar makes the heart rate sensor but Casio didn't implement it well at all. There are some very good videos on its lack of accuracy
From the average gather with the garmin over 4 weeks, so far in the casio it's pretty spot on. Maybe I'm just lucky though.
Algorythm is casio, not sensors
@@bubapsp the algorithm isn't Casios' they licensed it from Polar.
@@bubapsp the algorithm is licensed from Polar buy Casio for use in their watches. Casio didn't try and make their own health algorithm because it's much cheaper and easier to just license it. The benefit of the Polar algorithm being that Casio can update it with an over-the-air update.
Great and informative video. I’m torn between these two watches considering that my use would be everyday both at school and for fitness like gym for what would you say it’s better? Because I like the g schock more( I don’t really need all of the better tech that the garmin have) , but it might just look a little bit too big considering I’m an 18 y.o. What do you say?
If you're not deep into all of the specific activities of the garmin, I'd go with the casio. It's cool for an 18 year old and will and stands appart from the rest of the crowd. It is big but doesn't wear that big, as it's not bigger than most g-shocks out there!
But if you want better tracking, better support and community, go with the instinct 2.
Go with gshock you won’t regret it
You have a small wrist so you should have gotten the Instinct 2s. I have 6.25 inch wrist and I don't have the gap you get with the 45mm....
I had the 2s but it was way too small. I fixed the band issue by getting a replacement for a Fenix series instead.
@alphonsecadieux6127 it is small. I have trouble reading it at a glance, but I usually wear my Hamilton Khaki and use the Garmin's for 🚲 and 🚶♂️
I enjoy my inexpensive Casio ae1500. It's huge, but looks great.
In this comparison I would ho Garmin. More functionality and just looks better.
Did you consider the DWH 5600?
I prefer the instinct screen customization to the GBD - if the DWH 5600 had been out it would have been a touch choice, love the g shock square with MIP and solar and fitness
In terms of customization, the Casio can't compete with the Garmin. That being said, I believe they are also aimed at different types of people.
Which is aimed for who?@@alphonsecadieux6127
Is this the bigger version on the garmin 2x or just the standard size
The standard size, 45mm
@@alphonsecadieux6127 thanks bro
@Time2watchUK 🤜🤛
What is the watch face you have on the garmin
That's just one of Garmin's within the watch. You can select the information you prefer to be displayed.
I think the garmin is more in feature, but gshock is better in MIP Design
I like the Casio more because it’s screen is a complete circle. I mean there is nothing in the middle of screen covering it. Also Casio more visible.
Yes, definitely, the MIP display is a beauty on its own!
Great comparison video! Well done! 👍✌👏💪Guys! Who's heart is covered by G-Shock armor :Đ The Rangeman GPR-H1000 is coming next year. It will be a real beast! I recommend it to all to your attention!
I saw the announcement about it and I'm not to impress. I'm looking for a Gravitymaster at the moment.
It turns out that is the same thing as the hbd h2000
@@hugobarrera3848ua-cam.com/video/sXOd4fULnGI/v-deo.htmlsi=5fseGNRkOGeIVqsi
Garmin GPS syncs quicker and BT connects to app quicker. keeper for me
That is definitely a plus, indeed.
Incomparable. G-Shock is not near Garmin in terms of features. It is also millitary tested.
G-Shocks is also used in millitary because they are rough, and cheap. If they break you just buy a new one.
Casio always lacks functions and then sell a new one with one more function.
Garmin puts ut all in the watch.
Nowadays you'll find a lot of Garmin and Suunto in the wild. Recruits usually wears Timex or Casio watches, definitely. But I wouldn't call a 400$ casio cheap
@@alphonsecadieux6127 only in America Timex is used a lot. It is not a very used watch in the rest of the wests forces 😊
anyone confirm if G Shock can measure HR while swimming?
The Garmin is the obvious choice.
I don't know...casio is on the right path
Garmin looks like watch from 90th
casio MIP display is leagues a ahead of any monochrome display.
Totally agree
I love casio gshock and wanted this GBD so much, but after owning the instinct 2 solar for 18 months, i think its the best alround and so wont buy the casio.
The Garmin is definitely to established model to go with.
That being said, let's say you use the Casio for step counts, sleep tracking, heart rate readings and not the GPS functionality, then I'd go Casio for the simple fact that it's slightly cheaper.
I also grew tired of all the options available for customization on Garmin's end which...they won't tell you but the more options you have on the screen, the more battery it consume.
That, Casio is far ahead. It's a no BS, get the jog done type of watch.
Battery life, whic more longer?
The Garmin is the winner in the GPS mode
Garmin is better
Definitely. But the Casio can get better. The instinct line is getting saturated.
@@alphonsecadieux6127Casio has no apps. Makes it hard to justify.
it is, but i have a weak spot for gshocks
@@alphonsecadieux6127 I have a soft spot for G-Shocks. Garmin came out with instinct 2x its basically a baby Fenix 7x
I have the instinct 1 and it died after 2 years. Where all my gshocks are still working. So why is Garmin better? It can do more. Its not that robust
3:14 😂 everybody wants a big watch with a sensor so tight with a rubber strap that even the sweat can not leave 😂
🤣 at least someone appreciate the humoristic tone of the channel 😉
Which one did you end up keeping
Fun fact, I was offered a Suunto Vertical and took it. But I would have kept the Casio.
@@alphonsecadieux6127 interesting. I bought the casino, looks good to me, but gps acquisition takes several minutes. Also, 4 days have passed, still no sleep data. I also miss the torch function of the Garmin. I should have bought the Garmin, but more expensive though, and I like the look of Casio a bit more.
Let me check you Suunto vertical.
May I ask you why you would have choose the Casio?
What I like about the Casio despite of it's flaws is that it is what it is, no fancy gadget or screen, just plain information.
I would've loved it to have at least the breadcrumbs features of the GPR1000 BUT it's still a rugged, long lasting watch.
With both the DWH5600 and GBDH2000, the sleep tracker took more than the "2 nights" threshold to start tracking too.
And between Garmin and Suunto "flashlight" (Excluding the ones with actual LED light)…the Suunto wins. Way brighter.
I'm actually looking into getting an older Suunto Traverse Alpha. I found not to be using the heart rate sensor as much as I thought.
@@alphonsecadieux6127 thanks a lot for the detail reply. I didn't know there are health watches other than instinct will have torch, let me check out the Suunto.
Also, the steps count is way over count. For example, it shows 10929 steps while my Google Fit and WeChat Run both just shows around 6000 steps.
Which serious adult goes for the Casio? ⌚
Likely any 1970-80 kids who want that classic look. But do not required all of the complicated functions of an actual smart watch.
@@alphonsecadieux6127 but you could get the 80s Casio look and feel with a quick trip to Amazon. Example currently rocking the Fibit Sense with great notifications, answering calls from my wrist, Alexa OR google assistant, sleep tracking, weather, text reply, with a cheap Supcase or other case/band. Casio sucks at all listed above.
Yes, but it wouldn't be as cool 🤔
Serious adults who are not yuppie millennials mostly.
@nickvin7447 I could argue that Garmin is 100% dedicated to fitness and ruggedness. Much as Garmin per say BUT there's a lot of people out there that don't want music control or multiple faces or widgets.
Garmin
Was hoping you would have talked about the difference in features.
I likely will in a follow up video 😊
Japan product are the best ❤
Casio threw the ball away with the smart stuff... we need a rangeman for survival not for the gym tracking madness
Actually, the dwh5600 does a perfect job for that, I'd take the hr out and make it more like the gpr1000 🤜🤛
I owned both. Garmin blown my Casio out the water on every level i would never go back to Casio.
For some people, the casio is all that they need.
If you didnt normally have it connected to your phone would the instinct still be your pick? And if so why?
I would keep the Casio.
One perk of connectivity is the ability to reply to texts and messages. Silly, I know, but the Garmin envision is more favorable to smartwatch features.
But the Casio is easy to wear, use and get used too. It also looks pretty good!
@Claymore15. After owning and owing both we gonna have to agree to disagree. I dont wear any Gshock over this the past year bud they just gather dust.
HOW?!?! LIKE HOW are those watches 45 to 48 mm in diameter??!?!?!?! This looks like 45 to like 70 at least!? LMFAO!
Are you having a stroke??
@@alphonsecadieux6127 Yes, a stroke of disbelief, this casio looks good on anyones wrist(unless you wear it over a coat). Like people in the half of previous century worn watches with 34mm diameter, a decade ago it was closer to 38-42mm and now this. I am really proud of our cardio-vascular diseases progression in the last couple decades.
@@mefjupl8679 you funny 🤣
That Casio Instinct is one hot mess. Their Software and Design Engineers suck.
Maybe they do for you but quite honestly, I can see why a legion of people love it.
Garmin is amazing with their technology but it is a bit overwhelming for most common mortals