Your papers, please! Canadian Bill S-210 proposes age verification law for internet users.

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 вер 2024
  • There’s a bill working its way through the Parliament that presents a clear and present danger to the free and open internet, to freedom of expression and to privacy online. It’s a private member’s bill that shockingly has gotten traction.
    In a nutshell, it will require any website on the entire global internet that makes sexually explicit material available to verify the age of anyone who wants access, to ensure that they are not under the age of eighteen. Keeping sexually explicit material away from kids sounds like a laudable goal and one that most people can get behind.
    The devil, as they say, is in the details. It presents a real risk to privacy, a real risk to freedom of expression and a real danger to the open internet in Canada. The author of the Bill says it does none of that, but I believe she is mistaken.
    You can track Bill S-210 and read the text here: www.parl.ca/Le...
    Professor Geist's commentary is here: www.michaelgei...
    The Bill's sponsor has a defence (FAQ) of the bill here: bills210-lois2...
    Where you can find me
    ► Privacylawyer blog: blog.privacyla...
    ► My law firm: www.mcinnescoo....
    ► Twitter: / privacylawyer
    ► LinkedIn: / davidtsfr. .
    Disclaimer: This is intended for education and information only and should not be taken as legal advice. If you need advice for your particular situation, you should seek out qualified counsel.
    All views expressed are solely those of the creator and should not be attributed to his firm or any of its clients.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 26

  • @frodo7287
    @frodo7287 Місяць тому +1

    Politicians that manufacture these laws that blatantly violate the Charter should be liable to lawsuits

  • @wolphin732
    @wolphin732 7 місяців тому +7

    11:42. it also adds another discrimintory measure... it requires you to have a ID card, and to have a camera on your computer.

  • @solidmoon8266
    @solidmoon8266 6 місяців тому +3

    This bill shouldn't fly in the slightest. There's so much wrong with this that those pushing this bill should be looked into to see if there were more insidious purposes for getting that info.
    People can put child filters on their computers that do all of this without the need for the government to get involved. Especially when parents could just keep track of their childrens browser history.

  • @frodo7287
    @frodo7287 Місяць тому

    If she was appointed by Trudeau I highly doubt she is legitimately independent.

  • @rreiter
    @rreiter 7 місяців тому +6

    Thanks David! I agree 100%. And on the technical side, even if some common 0-knowledge or "AI-based" authentication method could be found for age-verification, _someone_ would find a way to subvert or exploit it. Your encyclopedia example is good. I can think of other examples in which foreign actors could wreak denial-of-service havoc in a world where cars, fridges, homes are connected just like my desktop computer and phone. People place too much faith in tech.

  • @franssanders3737
    @franssanders3737 7 місяців тому +6

    Thank you for posting this. This is one of the scariest things I have heard of recently. It raises so many questions and concerns that it is mind boggling that the bill is progressing. Some times good intentions are not enough.

  • @frodo7287
    @frodo7287 Місяць тому

    So bureaucrats who are shielded from personal accountability get to make decisions on what I can do

  • @anthonysmith416
    @anthonysmith416 7 місяців тому +5

    Thank you for the clarification in respect to a defence needing to be raised post charge (often resulting in questionable charges being laid). This information, put so concisely, will be very helpful for me in my advocacy practice.

  • @X3r0.
    @X3r0. 7 місяців тому +9

    Great video , thank you for highling the need for specificity within these bills for educational purposes etc.

  • @brucetattrie7341
    @brucetattrie7341 7 місяців тому +2

    Thanks David! Agree 100%.

  • @krypto8067
    @krypto8067 7 місяців тому +3

    Thanks for this video, David.

  • @elight9850
    @elight9850 7 місяців тому +2

    I don't know anyone who would upload ID to use the internet. Like you said...bad things can happen when biometrics are involved. If it did become a law however, I'd just stop using the internet.

  • @MalarkTheJester
    @MalarkTheJester 7 місяців тому +2

    Would Canadians with VPNs be able to circumnavigate this bill if it became law?

    • @Red-Brick-Dream
      @Red-Brick-Dream 6 місяців тому

      Yes. Easily. The lead-poisoned gerontocrats who dreamt this bill up have no idea what a VPN is.

  • @DonJoyce
    @DonJoyce 7 місяців тому +3

    Incredible that this bill is progressing. Thanks for sharing this, David! And thanks for including your dry humour.... Captain of the PornForce...lol!

  • @kperp
    @kperp 3 місяці тому

    Sounds like it will target a lot of gender stuff, therefore it will absolutely be retailored to prevent such things

  • @gregmurdoch3264
    @gregmurdoch3264 7 місяців тому +1

    Seriously? What happens if you put your infrastructure outside Canada and register your company outside of Canada?
    What about education, most porn can easily be defined as education, most BDSM porn is educational. It would be hard to claim Sexual Brokem, Device Bondage, The Upper Floor, HuCow, and other BDSM series aren't educational.
    Another thing, just use a VPN and make sure your DNS resolvers are encrypted. Make sure your site informs people to alway use a VPN, and how. This is a stupid, stupid bill.

    • @andrewj464
      @andrewj464 7 місяців тому +2

      Sites hosted outside Canada will not be affected, but the CRTC could force Canadian ISPs to block access; though this is easily circumvented through VPNs as you mentioned. Your idea that most porn can be defined as educational is nonsense; pornography is produced with prurient intent and I know of no court case that says otherwise. Not that I am some kind of puritan looking to limit what adults access, and I agree it is a deeply stupid bill.

    • @gregmurdoch3264
      @gregmurdoch3264 7 місяців тому

      @andrewj464 okay but let's assume a child has questions about alternative sexual lifestyles, that's where BDSM porn, done safely, and with consent, becomes educational. Would you know a teacher or many parents who would be comfortable handling questions about BDSM themes?

    • @andrewj464
      @andrewj464 7 місяців тому

      @@gregmurdoch3264 There are a plethora of articles available online, many from trusted and sex-positive therapists, describing every aspect of alternative lifestyles and sexualities.

  • @Patrick-op9zt
    @Patrick-op9zt 5 місяців тому

    Promo_SM 😝