Honestly third game was worse for me, that poor random was a good sport and we get to watch Simp use that sportsmanship to devour his elo like a starving shark lol
In his normal videos, it wouldn't be, since he would not be able to make the capture when checked, however, you are absolutely correct here, though it is easy to forget.
It probably would be fair, if both players decide to not reveal their drawback. Then the opponent would just unsuspectingly develop all their pieces, giving you counterplay. But simp just had to reveal it.
Honestly, I don't think so. If his opponent actually played around simp's square restriction at all, or realized that the queen can basically solo scholar's mate and defended that, then he could've drawn the game out to his advantage fairly quickly. Sure, with simp knowing the drawback, defending the king gets harder, but kings usually don't have to move much until endgame aside from castling, meanwhile simp would've had to constantly watch which of his pieces were under threat at any time because they basically become undefended every other turn.
Hell, even defending from simp's attacks is actually a lot easier since, aside from knights, the opponent could literally block attacks with undefended pieces simply by placing them on simp's restricted color for the turn.
Still, it was fortunate for simp that his opponent had a drawback that restricted king movement though, since the enemy king could literally become invincible if it simply alternated tile color according to simps restriction.
I can't believe how bad that first opponent was, I can only assume he didn't notice simps drawback, I would have made him maidenless right from the start
I would have went for the king. Make a pawn chain, then dunk Queen onto King whilst a pawn is still discovered. Yeah, take that pawn while I commit mass regicide.
With a better opponent, Simp could have been absolutely humiliated. After his first knight move to c6, it was already checkmate. Opponent pushes the E pawn to e5 into forced pawn take by knight into queen taking knight + check into either bishop or queen forced block on e7, and all the opponent has to do is play pawn to a3, forcing the bishop/queen to take it, winning white a free king.
Except that it also means his queen is useless. But as usualy, simp has no actual clue and plays drawback chess as if he's the only one with a drawback.
@@DrZaius3141 an useless queen vs immortal pieces. Revealing makes it difficult.. Just look at this game, all his opponent had to do was to keep the knights on their home squares and unleash a bishop and a rook.
You actually got kinda lucky with the opponent's drawback in the second game. It stopped him from abusing his invulnerable queen to wreck your backline/king
In the second game, there was actually a slight benefit for Simp from the opponent's drawvback. Normally, his queen would be invulnerable and could just wreck havoc on his pieces with impunity until he had captured a rook. In this game, his queen couldn't exploit its invulnerability as much due to being restricted to king movement. Not that it made any difference to the outcome, as bishops and rooks are enough to annihilate the position if they can't be taken.
2nd game, his queen could have came in and literally 3 move check mated you as you could not capture it, it could have just crashed into your pawn line and won. So when you said your drawback was completely countered by his you were wrong, his drawback is the only thing that stopped a 3 move checkmate.
I think what he actually meant was that the opponent's drawback was completely countered by simp's. He said it wrong, but even though the opponent's drawback was basically "replace your strongest piece with another lose condition" simp's made both the king and the queen invincible so it didn't actually matter. There was no way for simp to use his opponent's drawback to his advantage. Sure, the opponent would've had an even easier time destroying simp with his queen, but with simp's drawback that would've just been overkill.
There was an out for the player in the last game. Move the Queen to a safe space such as d6. Then, simp can't take the king due to his drawback and the king can escape to d8 next turn. The situation still looks bad, but knowing Simp's drawback, maybe they could have played out of it.
knowing simp's drawback, they shouldn't have even let it get that far. it would've been fairly simple to block the queen's approach if the opponent had thought to take advantage of simp's drawback at all.
Last game was fun. If only any less punishing drowback for enemy than he could literaly run down entire board with just a king alternating white and black squares making him unkillable :) [no diagonal moves]
3:30 - opponent could have played into Simp's drawback at the end, if he cleared the fork. push c3, let the knight in (thinking it's a free shot at the rook), then push a3 - the knight is forced to take a3, which can let the rook out.
yo Pacman is my favorite drawback WAKKA WAKKA (but when you reveal your drawback)... your "wakka wakka" is mad cursed for Pacman, the hippo is ideal. that 2nd one... oof. the 3rd one was free.
5:20 I don't think his plan was that specific. He just knew that the bishops would be unkillable if he holds his knights back so he brought them out as fast as possible.
At 6:25, could Simp have played Bishop takes F7 check, then king cant take back due to Queen guarding, so is forced to move King to F8, after which he could have taken the knight, leveling up?
The opponent could've played a3 at any time, so that the bishop would be forced to capture it, and since there is another pawn on b2, Shrimp is forced to waste another move, so the opponent can just bring his queen right next to the king and capture it.
With a better opponent, Simp could have been absolutely humiliated in that first game. After his first knight move to c6, it was already checkmate. Opponent pushes the E pawn to e5 into forced pawn take by knight into queen taking knight + check into either bishop or queen forced block on e7, and all the opponent has to do is play pawn to a3, forcing the bishop/queen to take it, winning white a free king.
The last opponent could have played Qd7 instead of moving their knight. Then you have to move to a dark square and then they can capture your queen, so you'd have to move Qf4 (the only dark square retreat with the Q)
@@smickothesmickestI’d prefer if he didn’t do it. I feel the games would be a lot more interesting as a result. The second one just wasn’t fun to watch, but could’ve been if he didn’t reveal it. At the very least I think it would be a lot better to conditionally reveal the drawback based on how hard it is. The whole testosterone coward thing is a cute gimmick but I do think it actually makes the videos a bit worse.
A fun idea at 2:36 for white would have been b4. If pawn takes b4, Qd8 wins the game as rook is forced to take on a2. If you take the pawn with the knight, Qd8 still wins, as knight is forced to either A2 or C2. I can't think of a way to stop it, but I'm only 700 rated lmao. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
That second game was difficult to watch.
Honestly third game was worse for me, that poor random was a good sport and we get to watch Simp use that sportsmanship to devour his elo like a starving shark lol
The game is the game
Simp blundering mate in one on first game at 3:14 to bishop to b5 and Simp is forced to capture the pawn. Good thing opp timed out.
Dang, I didn't even see that. That drawback is too vicious.
And here I thought I was smart seeing the queen blunder before Simp did.
In his normal videos, it wouldn't be, since he would not be able to make the capture when checked, however, you are absolutely correct here, though it is easy to forget.
I saw it too! I never see these things
White's a3 at 2:32 would have been a nice win for him too-Bxa3 is forced, white takes the queen, then Bxb2 is forced, white takes the king.
the voice when he says "wakka wakka" 💀
"You play normally but with no queen" vs "you cannot capture anything ever unless your opponent develops knights."
Sounds faaaaaaiiiiir.
It probably would be fair, if both players decide to not reveal their drawback. Then the opponent would just unsuspectingly develop all their pieces, giving you counterplay. But simp just had to reveal it.
At third game, opponents drawback was way harder when revealed
Respect for him to reveal it back to simp
Honestly, I don't think so. If his opponent actually played around simp's square restriction at all, or realized that the queen can basically solo scholar's mate and defended that, then he could've drawn the game out to his advantage fairly quickly. Sure, with simp knowing the drawback, defending the king gets harder, but kings usually don't have to move much until endgame aside from castling, meanwhile simp would've had to constantly watch which of his pieces were under threat at any time because they basically become undefended every other turn.
Hell, even defending from simp's attacks is actually a lot easier since, aside from knights, the opponent could literally block attacks with undefended pieces simply by placing them on simp's restricted color for the turn.
Still, it was fortunate for simp that his opponent had a drawback that restricted king movement though, since the enemy king could literally become invincible if it simply alternated tile color according to simps restriction.
I loved the sarcasm in the text-to-speech saying "very funny" to the Pac-Man reference!
I can't believe how bad that first opponent was, I can only assume he didn't notice simps drawback, I would have made him maidenless right from the start
I would have went for the king. Make a pawn chain, then dunk Queen onto King whilst a pawn is still discovered. Yeah, take that pawn while I commit mass regicide.
I sometimes wonder if revealing the drawback gives the opponent twice as much to think about and panics them into making mistakes.
Those first two drawbacks were brutal
Never before have I seen Simp blunder his Queen for so many moves in a row, that first game was wild
Stressing at simp blundering his queen constantly to white h4 in the first game
Petition for a series of drawback chess without revealing the challenge
Nah that'd be lame
"winning is forced" is certainly one of the phrases of all time
First game both players missed the h4 push, winning Simp's queen
Was thinking the same. Simp managed to blunder his queen on his first move. 😂
it was mentioned at 2:20
came here to say this
With a better opponent, Simp could have been absolutely humiliated. After his first knight move to c6, it was already checkmate. Opponent pushes the E pawn to e5 into forced pawn take by knight into queen taking knight + check into either bishop or queen forced block on e7, and all the opponent has to do is play pawn to a3, forcing the bishop/queen to take it, winning white a free king.
If only he'd mention it
that second opponent's drawback is an antithesis to simp's
He said it, it's obvious, useless comment
Except that it also means his queen is useless. But as usualy, simp has no actual clue and plays drawback chess as if he's the only one with a drawback.
@@danielwanger5919 i typed mine before he said it himself😅 chill my guy
@@DrZaius3141 true, his drawback literally f'ed him up
@@DrZaius3141 an useless queen vs immortal pieces. Revealing makes it difficult..
Just look at this game, all his opponent had to do was to keep the knights on their home squares and unleash a bishop and a rook.
That first opponent was so bad it was painful to watch...
Really needs to consider only revealing the drawback 3 turns in, some of these drawbacks are relentless if revealed at start
You actually got kinda lucky with the opponent's drawback in the second game. It stopped him from abusing his invulnerable queen to wreck your backline/king
“Now he’s gonna fork me”. Yeah, he forked you all right. :D
In the second game, there was actually a slight benefit for Simp from the opponent's drawvback. Normally, his queen would be invulnerable and could just wreck havoc on his pieces with impunity until he had captured a rook. In this game, his queen couldn't exploit its invulnerability as much due to being restricted to king movement. Not that it made any difference to the outcome, as bishops and rooks are enough to annihilate the position if they can't be taken.
Simp resigned. What a miracle.
2nd game, his queen could have came in and literally 3 move check mated you as you could not capture it, it could have just crashed into your pawn line and won. So when you said your drawback was completely countered by his you were wrong, his drawback is the only thing that stopped a 3 move checkmate.
I think what he actually meant was that the opponent's drawback was completely countered by simp's. He said it wrong, but even though the opponent's drawback was basically "replace your strongest piece with another lose condition" simp's made both the king and the queen invincible so it didn't actually matter. There was no way for simp to use his opponent's drawback to his advantage. Sure, the opponent would've had an even easier time destroying simp with his queen, but with simp's drawback that would've just been overkill.
8:00 opponent be like "Queen to F7 would be very unfortunate, but nobody plays like that... right?"
Last game, they had Qd7, forcing your queen to move backwards onto a dark square, allowing them to untangle.
There was an out for the player in the last game. Move the Queen to a safe space such as d6. Then, simp can't take the king due to his drawback and the king can escape to d8 next turn.
The situation still looks bad, but knowing Simp's drawback, maybe they could have played out of it.
knowing simp's drawback, they shouldn't have even let it get that far. it would've been fairly simple to block the queen's approach if the opponent had thought to take advantage of simp's drawback at all.
I'm surprised the queen check didn't end the game for you - you still CAN take the pawn in this format when in check, but you lost lose.
There’s no pawn available for capture in that position. Rxd8 was a legal move.
If you didn't reveal your drawback on this video, you could had 300% winrate
That second game was such a throw
So with that math, if he does one of these videos, loses two games and wins one, then it's a 100% lose rate?
no, it's a failure, so the series ends
why did I immediately read the thumbnail in anya's voice 💀
Last game was fun. If only any less punishing drowback for enemy than he could literaly run down entire board with just a king alternating white and black squares making him unkillable :) [no diagonal moves]
3:30 - opponent could have played into Simp's drawback at the end, if he cleared the fork. push c3, let the knight in (thinking it's a free shot at the rook), then push a3 - the knight is forced to take a3, which can let the rook out.
7:31 imagine this: black captures d4, if white does not move to d3, black can safely move there next turn, and then to d2 if it's not blocked
bro got the common species and then the rare: "excited indigo bear", and then "energetic indigo bear"
In the third game your opponent could easily win by moving his knight to the color you can't move to and by only moving this knight
Waka waka, say nevermore
yo Pacman is my favorite drawback WAKKA WAKKA (but when you reveal your drawback)...
your "wakka wakka" is mad cursed
for Pacman, the hippo is ideal.
that 2nd one... oof.
the 3rd one was free.
their drawback rating is broken. even without revealing to the opponent, the second drawback can't have been easier than the third.
In the first game you blundered the queen on the first move. He could have went h4 and you would have to capture the pawn with the queen
in the first game 2. h4 by opponent would be destroying
That last guy was ridiculous bad wtf 😂
8:19 , that one bishop in the moon:
Bro blundered his queen on move 1
Gigachad opponents.
Maybe th first opponent deliberatl ignored the revealed drawback
5:20 I don't think his plan was that specific. He just knew that the bishops would be unkillable if he holds his knights back so he brought them out as fast as possible.
The 2nd opponent could’ve really just moved their knight and simp wouldn’t have been able to do anything 😭
At 6:25, could Simp have played Bishop takes F7 check, then king cant take back due to Queen guarding, so is forced to move King to F8, after which he could have taken the knight, leveling up?
You can move your king into check in drawback check.
This channel is so underrated
The opponent could've played a3 at any time, so that the bishop would be forced to capture it, and since there is another pawn on b2, Shrimp is forced to waste another move, so the opponent can just bring his queen right next to the king and capture it.
With a better opponent, Simp could have been absolutely humiliated in that first game. After his first knight move to c6, it was already checkmate. Opponent pushes the E pawn to e5 into forced pawn take by knight into queen taking knight + check into either bishop or queen forced block on e7, and all the opponent has to do is play pawn to a3, forcing the bishop/queen to take it, winning white a free king.
The last opponent could have played Qd7 instead of moving their knight.
Then you have to move to a dark square and then they can capture your queen, so you'd have to move Qf4 (the only dark square retreat with the Q)
At the end of game 1, isn't bishop B5 winning for white ?
Oh dang it is. Simp hung mate in 2.
I wanted to see how the second opponent bongclouds simp to death, boooo(
Since your winrate is always a multiple of 100%, you could just say "1 winrate" or "3 winrate"
Love how your first 6 moves all blundered your queen, and your last move blundered a knight, and still you won the first game SMH...0
3:33 Bb5 is literally checkmate lmao
waiting for the day simps drawback is death wish and he forces himself to reveal drawback to opponent
What is that drawback?
if you can move into check, you must
@@manstick64 Damn
really don't like the idea of reveal the drawback to opponent
But the testosterone of doing it and winning makes it all worth it, plus it's optional so if you're a coward you can choose not to anyway
Seems like you’re a coward then
@@smickothesmickestI’d prefer if he didn’t do it. I feel the games would be a lot more interesting as a result. The second one just wasn’t fun to watch, but could’ve been if he didn’t reveal it.
At the very least I think it would be a lot better to conditionally reveal the drawback based on how hard it is. The whole testosterone coward thing is a cute gimmick but I do think it actually makes the videos a bit worse.
Really like the idea of reveal the drawback to opponent
@@Deathranger999 I mean, for that we have all the regular vids in which he does not reveal the challenge to the opponent. Or that there even is one.
A fun idea at 2:36 for white would have been b4. If pawn takes b4, Qd8 wins the game as rook is forced to take on a2.
If you take the pawn with the knight, Qd8 still wins, as knight is forced to either A2 or C2.
I can't think of a way to stop it, but I'm only 700 rated lmao. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
2 win - 1 loss
200% -100% = 100% winrate.
Thumbnail remind me of Shakira...add a 3rd Wakka pls😂
shakira didn't sing 3 wakka's, "tsamina mina eh eh, *wakka wakka* eh eh", only 2 wakkas
No Kings were taken en passant in this video 😥
You should play King of the Bridge
I want to know why the game plan wasn't pawn storm.
Can you show ur oponents drawback at the begining for a short time with spoilers alert so its more funy for some of us
Why did they consider a Bishop to be stronger than a Knight?
Why is he so intent on revealing his drawback?
on the first game, was bishop b5 an instant win for white as you are forced to Nxc2?
Shinmon benimaru
lol I love the 100% win rate math. It’s totally correct. I trust him because hes asian
Bro game 1 u blundered your queen move 1 and he didn’t see it and you didn’t see it then it remained blundered until move 7
Wakka wakka
At 6:10, why not Queen to G7, to take the Knight, to allow taking the Bishop?
Video 204 of asking simp to play fps chess
Really wish you wouldn’t reveal the drawback.
Yes I get it, Testosterone move and whatever, but it kind of ruins the fun.
No chance he hits 1500
3:20 you blundered a checkmate in 1 (Bb5, pawn capture is forced, BxKing)
Math ain't mathing
Only simp is forced to capture pawns, not the opponent...
@@3snoW_ You made me realize I wrote Bb4 instead of Bb5
@@oicmorez4129 oooh i see what you meant. Well spotted
@@oicmorez4129 You were correct the first time, but I still don't see the pawn you'd need to capture.
Good morning
You're nuts for revealing your drawback on the second game, do you always reveal or would you decide not to if it's just that bad?
0:53
If in the second game the queen was a king, does it mean that it’s a chess gay couple?
this asian really said good evening when i just woke up from a nap in the afternoon 😅
Eh eh
23 minutes
day 3 of begging simp not to reveal drawbacks
Good evening? The video is uploaded first thing in the morning here in the States.
Always revealing is boring :(