Russia has been launching missiles for years. This isn't different. Edit: Russia will not launch nukes so what makes this missile any different? It goes 5000 miles per hour instead of 3000? And probably costs 10 times as much?
@@enolopanr9820 considering Russia just change their documents on how and when they can launch a nuclear bomb for the first time ever it is absolutely different you fool
That's not ICBM ICBM's fly in Arc's & can't hit anything that close, because of the arcs they fly along. As their engines are off by the time they start entering the atmosphere.
We have seen the misinformation about Russian power! It's obvious to actually compete, putin needs to threaten the entire world with mass distribution! But that includes Russia! So my question is are the people actually stupid enough to support assured destruction of all countries? Because both Trump and Putin obviously don't give a crap about this possibility! Billions of peoples lives are in the hands of 2 insane egomaniacs! Of course there thousands in both countries that want to see the world burn! But there insane also! Ignorance is excusable only so far!
Let me illuminate this for you: Russia wants Ukraine to be its colony, its satellite. It wants the Ukrainian people gone -- assimilated into the vast Russian populace without any Ukrainian identity.
Russia made Ukraine an enemy by invading them. Ukraine has the right as a sovereign state to join whatever alliance it wants. Russia should get no say. Putin is stupid for starting this war
More likely that Putin is just low on regular missiles They have been converting anti-aircraft missiles to attack ground targets When all you have is rocks, you throw rocks
The experts' report states: "The launch of a Russian missile, if it had been flying with a nuclear charge, would not have hit the target, since solid fuel is used up every second, with a large warhead load it may not hit the target accurately, so it could have been a small charge, not 50 tons, as the Russian media lie, but much less, so it would not have hit the target at all. Therefore, Russia closed this project on March 22, 2018, fearing its testing. Only the model with fuel reached the Dnieper and, therefore, flew a long distance, using up the fuel. The launch of such a missile is determined by a special distance and not from different sides, it is determined, for example, by the nearest border, and not from central Russia. All launches in Russia are tracked by satellites. But the US, UK and France have intercontinental nuclear missiles that have been tested and hit the target. We know how Russia maintains a nuclear charge, which must be constantly changed. It costs a lot of money. billions of dollars, and I will say that support for Russia's nuclear warheads is at a low level. They themselves do not understand why they support this, because the missiles are not accurate in their targets. And strikes on NATO countries will end in failure, Putin understands that a retaliatory accurate nuclear strike will fly at Moscow.
RS-26 Rubezh which is new Russian ICBM, first time tested on battlefield with conventional warheads. US administration was informed about this yesterday. Russia simply showed you that Ukraine can be wiped out in 5 minutes. Even US ICBM early warning system wasn't able to detect it. No air defense can intercept it. Hopefully warmongers in the West received this message.
nope that was NOT russias actual message, bcuz russia knows it cannot ever use even one nuke! It was warned several times during this war, directly by the head of the U.S. military who spoke with his counterpart in russia to tell him that if Ru uses even one WMD of any type against Ukr, a response by the West directly will do xyz to include neutralizing Ru's conventional forces or similar damage to Russian assets of some sort or another, and when the russian said is that a threat, the american responded that he was the head of the United States military, the strongest force on earth and he doesn't make threats.". Russia is not able to project its forces. Ru IS NOTHING.
Russia have literally 0 defenses against any ICBM launched to them, but there is not need for NATO to even do a demostration, if there is a demostration will be just one with nuclear warheads.
its ironic knowing what media said about russia since war started, they they are weak, they military is shit and tech is old. now they do this and spare people not buking them.... media and entire democrats of eu/usa must be in trial.
Russia notified the States more than 24 hours before the launch that it was going to do the ICBM. That means, propaganda nonsense only for ignorant in public realms. Nothing fantastic going on.
At first I thought this was a time-lapse video, but after watching it again, I saw that the speed of the rocket hitting the ground was incredibly fast.
There is actually an Orthodox Christian prophecy about Ukraine - "A Jester will end the nation and bring great tragedy to its people". Look it up I spat out my coffee when I came across it 3 months ago!
The experts' report states: "The launch of a Russian missile, if it had been flying with a nuclear charge, would not have hit the target, since solid fuel is used up every second, with a large warhead load it may not hit the target accurately, so it could have been a small charge, not 50 tons, as the Russian media lie, but much less, so it would not have hit the target at all. Therefore, Russia closed this project on March 22, 2018, fearing its testing. Only the model with fuel reached the Dnieper and, therefore, flew a long distance, using up the fuel. The launch of such a missile is determined by a special distance and not from different sides, it is determined, for example, by the nearest border, and not from central Russia. All launches in Russia are tracked by satellites. But the US, UK and France have intercontinental nuclear missiles that have been tested and hit the target. We know how Russia maintains a nuclear charge, which must be constantly changed. It costs a lot of money. billions of dollars, and I will say that support for Russia's nuclear warheads is at a low level. They themselves do not understand why they support this, because the missiles are not accurate in their targets. And strikes on NATO countries will end in failure, Putin understands that a retaliatory accurate nuclear strike will fly at Moscow.
Yeah, they've been fighting a certain narrow war path given the terms of their claims to tge international community. Ukraine firing right into actual Russian space gives them the justification to throw their gloves off. Meanwhile, the last thing NATO wants is to be dragged into an actual war.
I guarantee you there's going to be somebody say something like that's not true they are not s*** but I thought about it and if you do think about it you a country that what's formidable in cold war was just chilling 🤔 nah who was United States competing with this whole time making all these new weapons it is apparent Russia do have something
ICBM's were originally designed to hold nukes. This was the nuclear equivalent of "I dare you to do it agian, and I'll just add nukes." Keep in mind each of those flashs would possibly contain a nuke cause they're a mixture of real ones and dummies to confuse anti missile defences.
Oh yea, so many people are ignorant to what war truly is, and would be shocked when they found out this isn’t even a full scale war yet, this is still very soft for what it could potentially become, this war is weak.
@@swagedelicPutin WOULD be getting a present. An excuse to mobilize. Of course, regular Russians would actually be the ones to suffer. But Putin gets his "conflict where they are at least pretending to only hold onto only Crimea" to "an all-out war using any means necessary."
The experts' report states: "The launch of a Russian missile, if it had been flying with a nuclear charge, would not have hit the target, since solid fuel is used up every second, with a large warhead load it may not hit the target accurately, so it could have been a small charge, not 50 tons, as the Russian media lie, but much less, so it would not have hit the target at all. Therefore, Russia closed this project on March 22, 2018, fearing its testing. Only the model with fuel reached the Dnieper and, therefore, flew a long distance, using up the fuel. The launch of such a missile is determined by a special distance and not from different sides, it is determined, for example, by the nearest border, and not from central Russia. All launches in Russia are tracked by satellites. But the US, UK and France have intercontinental nuclear missiles that have been tested and hit the target. We know how Russia maintains a nuclear charge, which must be constantly changed. It costs a lot of money. billions of dollars, and I will say that support for Russia's nuclear warheads is at a low level. They themselves do not understand why they support this, because the missiles are not accurate in their targets. And strikes on NATO countries will end in failure, Putin understands that a retaliatory accurate nuclear strike will fly at Moscow.
First of all, it was a demonstration that modern missile defense is not capable of protecting against such missiles. Any missile defense, and there are a lot of them on the territory of Ukraine now. Next time, rockets with a payload will fly, and I very much doubt that their targets will be in Ukraine.
The logic of recent events suggests that anyone can have these missiles, permission to launch and target selection is no longer required. Even French farmers can buy a couple of them to level their forces with the police.
SM6s could 'in theory' stop a few (assuming a BMD warship was in the correct position). Sadly most of SM6 stockpile was used up to stop propane tanks launched from Yemen.
@@nextentrepreneur9288 I suspect part of the motive of the warning was so that the US intelligence services could closely see the performance of the missile
It’s the entry vehicles. Each missile has six. They were all just set to hit the same spot. They can all goto different spots from one missile. The glow like that bc they come in from space and get white hot bc they are going hypersonic
The launch of a russian missile with a nuclear charge would not be accurate, since nuclear fuel is used up every second, with a large warhead load it may not hit the target exactly, so it could be a small charge not 50 tons, as the Russian media lie, but much smaller, so that it would not hit the target at all. A dummy with fuel was flying along the Dnieper and therefore it flew a long distance, using up the fuel. The launch of such a missile is determined by a special distance and not from different sides, it is determined, for example, by the nearest border, and not from central Russia. All launches in Russia are monitored by satellites.
@@unknowndivision170 experts"The launch of a Russian missile, if it were flying with a nuclear charge, would not hit the target, since solid fuel is consumed every second, with a large charge load of 1-50 tons of warhead, it does not reach the target at all. Russia closed this project in 2018, fearing its testing. Only the fuel tank reached the Dnieper, which means it flew a long distance. The US, UK and France have intercontinental nuclear missiles that have been tested and hit the target."
It doesn't matter what it was, the main thing is that the air defense didn't work. This is the Yuzhmash plant, an object of strategic importance, it produced missiles.
These guys think that Russia is some jungle... it's funny. In general... Russia is technological country, much more so than many other countries, even modern 5nm electronics are impossible without Russian sapphire matrices(only in Russia technology and lowest world seismic activity allow them to be produced). Russia is also world leader in carbon nanotubes production for flexible electronics
iPhone screens are thin and durable because Russians came up with technology for producing artificial sapphires for flat screens; they even had a direct contract with Apple in 2015, then began supplying sapphires through Chinese companies, during the sanctions. If all countries worked together and without sanctions, we would have built a much better civilization than we have now.
russia never demonstrated the nukes it inherited still work. They are quite expensive to maintain and russia is one of the most corrupt countries on the planet...
@@ajc5479 So everyone who isnt supporting faking ukraine is an ivan? Stfu bro I live in NC and i know literally no people who support spending more money on this disaster. But if Im Ivan what are you? Ivano or whatever ukranian version of ivan is lmao.
It was not an attack by Ukraine. Ukraine has not technical capability to use these weapons. The US is responsible for the targeting, satellite guiding, and operation of the missiles, and ukraines merely pressed a button at most. It was basically an U.S./NATO attack on Russia
My friend sent me this. Russia considers itself entitled to use weapons against military installations of countries that allow the use of their weapons against the Russian Federation. This was stated by President Vladimir Putin. "And in case of escalation of aggressive actions, we will respond just as decisively and in a mirror manner. I recommend that the ruling elites of those countries that have plans to use their military contingents against Russia seriously think about this," he said. The Head of State stressed that there are no means of countering such weapons as the Hazel Bush. Missiles attack targets at a speed of 2.5-3 km per second. Western systems cannot intercept them.
And neither can Russia btw, they aren’t the only nation with ICBM’s. How long before the Ukrainians build their own hm? It was a Ukrainian who is considered the father of the soviet unions space program 🤔
@@temniykot they have nuclear power plants…… they have practical experience designing and building weapons. Ukrainians are famous for leading the field in the Soviet Unions space program lol. They could design and build an icbm in months if they are desperate 👀
@@JeroenvanHaren Every time he doesn't get his way he threatens to nuke all of NATO. Several times now I think he's all talk and a coward more so than Trump.
Don’t worry more to come ..😅😅😅… clown saying Russia attack out of fear 😂😂 seriously Russia is scared of clown 🤡 zelensky.. plz stop this joke … where is the damaged picture … clown 🤡 zelensky forget that he made huge mistake by attacking ACTM and Strom shadow …
The launch of a russian missile with a nuclear charge would not be accurate, since nuclear fuel is used up every second, with a large warhead load it may not hit the target exactly, so it could be a small charge not 50 tons, as the Russian media lie, but much smaller, so that it would not hit the target at all. A dummy with fuel was flying along the Dnieper and therefore it flew a long distance, using up the fuel. The launch of such a missile is determined by a special distance and not from different sides, it is determined, for example, by the nearest border, and not from central Russia. All launches in Russia are monitored by satellites.
Russia already deploying Mobil nuclear bunkers around cities, communication lines between countries severed, the firing of ICBM’s, Norway deploying 5 million pamphlets to citizens to prepare, and Germany mobilizing and preparing 800,000 troops…. It’s GAME ON.
Don't play Russian roulette with Russians; they are experts in the field. Spielt mit Russen kein russisches Roulette, Russen sind Profis auf dem Gebiet.
A very profitable fool. There is a video from Kupyansk where Russian soldiers are watching Zelensky as if on the palm of their hand, but do not strike. If Russia had annexed Ukraine in 2014, even the allies would have been scared. But if Russia annexes now, who, except the US and London, will be against it?
Russia: dont use US missiles Biden: you can use it Ukraine: (uses it) Russia: (responds with ICBM) CNN: its not ICBM, its not bidens fault. Its TRUMPS!!!! 2025 CNN: its trumps fault!!!!
Какая-нибудь Британия🎪🐒 с лёгкостью перехватит гиперзвуковые баллистические ракеты, летящие к её территории со скоростью 10 махов 😉🔥☢ Продолжайте и дальше испытывать терпение России...😉
@@manzanaresantonio There are many technologies, and there are aspects in which the US is weaker, there are aspects in which the US is stronger. There is no such state that the US is strong in everything. For example, from purely civilian things. In industry, the US is catastrophically inferior to China. China produces concrete (i.e. infrastructure) every couple of years more than the US has produced in its entire history. And so every 1-2 years.
@@struvrim7637 Russia can’t produce basic things like a car, a TV, a cellphone or a tractor worth buying in the international market. Russia is just a developing country, not an industrial superpower. Many companies will have to return to the USA under Trump or risk paying a huge import tariff. The USA is an industrial and technological monster You will never see a U.S. top weapons parade, because top guns are very secret!
NO. He's a hero. HIS country was attacked by Putin for NO reason, except that Putin wants to expand his territories. The FREE world needs to stop this now. GIVE Zelenskyy and the Ukrainian people whatever they need to stop Putin.
"He noted that one of the newest Russian medium-range missile systems was tested in combat conditions. In this case, according to Putin, a nuclear-free, hypersonic ballistic missile called Oreshnik was used." They can't intercept them lol
@@Richard-mu2kn Um no. Just a guy from Wisconsin with some common sense. Trump won with a mandate and the pathetic Democrat party better get out of the way. We need to get stuff done and Trump can do it.
Reporter: if the US doesn’t believe that this is an ICBM…we should believe that Me: if this scary speed is not of an ICBM, what could a real ICBM is capable of?
@@enolopanr9820wow never seen just more than Iran UAV in Ukraine😂😂😂 not even another weapons😂 and glorious ukraine is being supported by almost the whole world and still losing😂
@@vrrdt342 we heard the ukraine soldiers are running away like chickens and Zelensky is now forcing men to fight😂 The boys dont wanna die, maybe they should just accept the rubles & give up
Remember USA has enough ballistic missiles around Russia to turn into a parking lot. They have 1000s of anti defense missiles around Russia. So if they launch something not directed to Ukraine , they more than likely would be shot down and hit with the same power or worse.
Agree, it's sloppy journalism to show a map of Ukraine, with several cities - but without the city you are actually reporting on!? Why show the map at all?
The scuttle is the US may launch first, in a first move advantage. Locate in your area where the blastzone may be and be at least 35 miles from that zone for best survival.
Media: Russia is bluffing
Russia: launches ICBM
Media: it's not an ICBM..But we'll evacuate the embassy just in case.
Russia has been launching missiles for years. This isn't different. Edit: Russia will not launch nukes so what makes this missile any different? It goes 5000 miles per hour instead of 3000? And probably costs 10 times as much?
Media : Also my pants are not shit stained .. its camouflage pants
@@enolopanr9820 considering Russia just change their documents on how and when they can launch a nuclear bomb for the first time ever it is absolutely different you fool
The media, so full of shit
That's not ICBM
ICBM's fly in Arc's & can't hit anything that close, because of the arcs they fly along. As their engines are off by the time they start entering the atmosphere.
CNN so who destroyed nordstream ?
😆😅🤣😂👍👍👍
The main version is that the Nord Stream was destroyed by Somali pirates.
russians
russians
Americans
Russia could level Kiev in a few hours if it wanted to
Minutes or even seconds ;)
Даже не используя ядерные ракеты.
Problem is which way the prevailing winds will blow the radioactive plume. East into Russia, or west into the rest of Europe and NATO.
Yes but the Russia would vanish out of existence the minutes later.
We have seen the misinformation about Russian power! It's obvious to actually compete, putin needs to threaten the entire world with mass distribution! But that includes Russia! So my question is are the people actually stupid enough to support assured destruction of all countries? Because both Trump and Putin obviously don't give a crap about this possibility! Billions of peoples lives are in the hands of 2 insane egomaniacs! Of course there thousands in both countries that want to see the world burn! But there insane also! Ignorance is excusable only so far!
Putin has already given an interview and told what it was, and you clowns are still guessing😂
And? You clowns are praising russia for escalating nuclear war?
Enjoy it then.
😂😂😂😂
Yeah Putin never lies
They never read what Russia has to say
Like he can be trusted.
5 minutes delivery time. Beat that Amazon Prime
Faster than Dominoes Pizza
Easy. Where in Moscow is the delivery address?
@@guyspearing4608come on tough guy , you think you’ll be spared ,😂😂😂 lunatics
@guyspearing4608 same address as your mother
@dmitrykorovnikov2035 safer than the average orc and with a longer life expectancy to boot
Everyone in the comment section pretending that this is a game. Wars are not games. If this escalates too far, we will all lose. There are no winners.
Took way too long to scroll and find an actual sane and rationale comment.
russia can simply leave Ukraine if it wants to avoid total annihilation. It's not their country.
Yes and Putin knows that too..
Comment sections attract the bottom-feeders of humanity.
Russia needs to back off if it knows what is good for them.
Let me just remind you: Russia just wanted Ukraine to be neutral. but the West chose war.
THE DEMS CHOSE WAR
Zelenskky is stupid.
Let me illuminate this for you: Russia wants Ukraine to be its colony, its satellite. It wants the Ukrainian people gone -- assimilated into the vast Russian populace without any Ukrainian identity.
Russia invaded Ukraine twice now. That is different than wanting it to be neutral.
Russia made Ukraine an enemy by invading them. Ukraine has the right as a sovereign state to join whatever alliance it wants. Russia should get no say. Putin is stupid for starting this war
Zelensky need to take this very seriously. This was a warning shot.
this demo was not for him, lol
More likely that Putin is just low on regular missiles
They have been converting anti-aircraft missiles to attack ground targets
When all you have is rocks, you throw rocks
@@ComradeHugoyeah lol. It was for Ukraine but mostly was to send a message to us in America
@@ComradeHugo Absolutely right...
I wonder who's next; a base in Poland, the coast of Britain or Seattle...?! The question is open...
Seriously? He is going to go into Russia to celebrate 🍾 😄 😅😅
Russia is definitely holding back
They always have been. At any given point less than 20% of their army has been in Ukraine.
Holding back what? Their aggression?
It's like saying that you saved a girl from being raped just by using self control.
3days operation? 👌
Oh so now... - "It's holding back"? What happened to all the fuckbois and Ukraine lovers screaming "Russia is done! They have nothing left!"
The experts' report states: "The launch of a Russian missile, if it had been flying with a nuclear charge, would not have hit the target, since solid fuel is used up every second, with a large warhead load it may not hit the target accurately, so it could have been a small charge, not 50 tons, as the Russian media lie, but much less, so it would not have hit the target at all. Therefore, Russia closed this project on March 22, 2018, fearing its testing. Only the model with fuel reached the Dnieper and, therefore, flew a long distance, using up the fuel. The launch of such a missile is determined by a special distance and not from different sides, it is determined, for example, by the nearest border, and not from central Russia. All launches in Russia are tracked by satellites. But the US, UK and France have intercontinental nuclear missiles that have been tested and hit the target. We know how Russia maintains a nuclear charge, which must be
constantly changed. It costs a lot of money. billions of dollars,
and I will say that support for Russia's nuclear warheads is at a low level.
They themselves do not understand why they support this, because the missiles
are not accurate in their targets. And strikes on NATO countries will end in
failure, Putin understands that a retaliatory accurate nuclear strike will fly at Moscow.
Warning shot with no payload at all...Starting to think that Putin is really patient with Ukraine
Боевая нагрузка не понадобилась. При ударе на такой скорости, кинетическая энергия просто чудовищная.
So fast... it looks unreal
7.5km/s
@@elusive6119 nop. 2-3km/s . This is a new weapon "Орешник". Hypersonic.
10 Mahs
@@Каш505 yep
as if video is sped up
RS-26 Rubezh which is new Russian ICBM, first time tested on battlefield with conventional warheads. US administration was informed about this yesterday. Russia simply showed you that Ukraine can be wiped out in 5 minutes. Even US ICBM early warning system wasn't able to detect it. No air defense can intercept it. Hopefully warmongers in the West received this message.
nope that was NOT russias actual message, bcuz russia knows it cannot ever use even one nuke! It was warned several times during this war, directly by the head of the U.S. military who spoke with his counterpart in russia to tell him that if Ru uses even one WMD of any type against Ukr, a response by the West directly will do xyz to include neutralizing Ru's conventional forces or similar damage to Russian assets of some sort or another, and when the russian said is that a threat, the american responded that he was the head of the United States military, the strongest force on earth and he doesn't make threats.". Russia is not able to project its forces. Ru IS NOTHING.
Nah, we're taking them with us.
Russia have literally 0 defenses against any ICBM launched to them, but there is not need for NATO to even do a demostration, if there is a demostration will be just one with nuclear warheads.
its ironic knowing what media said about russia since war started, they they are weak, they military is shit and tech is old. now they do this and spare people not buking them.... media and entire democrats of eu/usa must be in trial.
Icbms can only be intercepted i nearly stages and they all can be detected
Russia was just reminding them that it has powerful shovels that will get you into bunkers.
How to spot a Ruzzian bot - They talk about shovels
Russia notified the States more than 24 hours before the launch that it was going to do the ICBM. That means, propaganda nonsense only for ignorant in public realms. Nothing fantastic going on.
You are right, it has shovels.
Tractors are a little too high tech for Russia.
NATO has shovels too.
@@ajc5479How to spot a ukro bot - they spell russia as ruzzia
At first I thought this was a time-lapse video, but after watching it again, I saw that the speed of the rocket hitting the ground was incredibly fast.
Those were warheads, not Rockets they all came from one missile
We are writing chapters of our own peril. We need to change course; period!
7 km/s insane
Those cannot be intercepted.
Its called MIRV's. There is no missile today that can intercept MIRV's once it reached final phase.
Comedian made his country end with tragedy
Once a clown always a clown
You are welcome to down your pants to any country you like. Comedian seems not like you.
There is actually an Orthodox Christian prophecy about Ukraine - "A Jester will end the nation and bring great tragedy to its people". Look it up I spat out my coffee when I came across it 3 months ago!
@@hradynarskiSo you agree he is a clown
The experts' report states: "The launch of a Russian missile, if it had been flying with a nuclear charge, would not have hit the target, since solid fuel is used up every second, with a large warhead load it may not hit the target accurately, so it could have been a small charge, not 50 tons, as the Russian media lie, but much less, so it would not have hit the target at all. Therefore, Russia closed this project on March 22, 2018, fearing its testing. Only the model with fuel reached the Dnieper and, therefore, flew a long distance, using up the fuel. The launch of such a missile is determined by a special distance and not from different sides, it is determined, for example, by the nearest border, and not from central Russia. All launches in Russia are tracked by satellites. But the US, UK and France have intercontinental nuclear missiles that have been tested and hit the target. We know how Russia maintains a nuclear charge, which must be
constantly changed. It costs a lot of money. billions of dollars,
and I will say that support for Russia's nuclear warheads is at a low level.
They themselves do not understand why they support this, because the missiles
are not accurate in their targets. And strikes on NATO countries will end in
failure, Putin understands that a retaliatory accurate nuclear strike will fly at Moscow.
Russia hasn't even shown an iota of their power in the last 3 years.
This is just that 2% of their abilities.
Yeah, they've been fighting a certain narrow war path given the terms of their claims to tge international community.
Ukraine firing right into actual Russian space gives them the justification to throw their gloves off.
Meanwhile, the last thing NATO wants is to be dragged into an actual war.
I guarantee you there's going to be somebody say something like that's not true they are not s*** but I thought about it and if you do think about it you a country that what's formidable in cold war was just chilling 🤔 nah who was United States competing with this whole time making all these new weapons it is apparent Russia do have something
3 years into the war and black sea fleet is gone. 😂😂😂 What great power.
@@winzyl9546 But thats not true you fool lol
Give some information to back your statements if what you say is true@@markmcloughlin3711
Well atleast it wasnt a nuke
ICBM's were originally designed to hold nukes. This was the nuclear equivalent of "I dare you to do it agian, and I'll just add nukes."
Keep in mind each of those flashs would possibly contain a nuke cause they're a mixture of real ones and dummies to confuse anti missile defences.
People are very casual about this. Putin just showed that he can win this any time he wants to.
FOR NOW!
@@Asgaardiangatekeeper Lmao reaching
@Asgaardiangatekeeper no. He cant.
I am Russian and your media didn't show you a video with original sound. Try to find it yourself, it sounded hell scary, like apocalypse
CNN has no credibility in U.S.A.
I live in Dnipro city, and it was even worse in real life
I've seen it.....and your 100% right.....this madness needs to stop before it all ends in tears...🇬🇧
Link?
Your President a maniac and crazy
If its Gaza they say its legal
But its Ukraine then its illegal
ICBMs were never used in war before
Betul 😅
@@iba278
It's not about weapons, it's about lives
What did anyone expect? A snowball fight? Geez.
😂😂 right
It's not fair. Kids talking 😂😂😂😂
Oh yea, so many people are ignorant to what war truly is, and would be shocked when they found out this isn’t even a full scale war yet, this is still very soft for what it could potentially become, this war is weak.
😂😂😂
🇺🇸 and CNN expected Russia to send flowers to Ukraine 😅😅
No, but Russia should expect a big nice present in return.
@@swagedelicYou want a world war?
@@swagedelicPutin WOULD be getting a present. An excuse to mobilize.
Of course, regular Russians would actually be the ones to suffer. But Putin gets his "conflict where they are at least pretending to only hold onto only Crimea" to "an all-out war using any means necessary."
@@swagedelic They won't get anything in return. Ukraine is not NATO.
@@swagedelic попробуйте) ваши подарки мы уже оценили,ловите наши и сидите молча.
Who is crazy here? Only Usa !
No,only putin and those who love putin.
No... Democrats crazy.
Most of us voted for Trump
@@MS-dx6cu Are you a fool? Who sponsored the Taliban? Ukrainian neo-Nazis? NATO is the only threat to the security of the whole world
The experts' report states: "The launch of a Russian missile, if it had been flying with a nuclear charge, would not have hit the target, since solid fuel is used up every second, with a large warhead load it may not hit the target accurately, so it could have been a small charge, not 50 tons, as the Russian media lie, but much less, so it would not have hit the target at all. Therefore, Russia closed this project on March 22, 2018, fearing its testing. Only the model with fuel reached the Dnieper and, therefore, flew a long distance, using up the fuel. The launch of such a missile is determined by a special distance and not from different sides, it is determined, for example, by the nearest border, and not from central Russia. All launches in Russia are tracked by satellites. But the US, UK and France have intercontinental nuclear missiles that have been tested and hit the target. We know how Russia maintains a nuclear charge, which must be
constantly changed. It costs a lot of money. billions of dollars,
and I will say that support for Russia's nuclear warheads is at a low level.
They themselves do not understand why they support this, because the missiles
are not accurate in their targets. And strikes on NATO countries will end in
failure, Putin understands that a retaliatory accurate nuclear strike will fly at Moscow.
You trolls are. Get a life
Patriot : What was that ?
ICBM : Hold my Bear
vodka !!
First of all, it was a demonstration that modern missile defense is not capable of protecting against such missiles. Any missile defense, and there are a lot of them on the territory of Ukraine now. Next time, rockets with a payload will fly, and I very much doubt that their targets will be in Ukraine.
The logic of recent events suggests that anyone can have these missiles, permission to launch and target selection is no longer required. Even French farmers can buy a couple of them to level their forces with the police.
SM6s could 'in theory' stop a few (assuming a BMD warship was in the correct position). Sadly most of SM6 stockpile was used up to stop propane tanks launched from Yemen.
They notified the US 30 minutes before the strikes and all missiles went through Ukrainian air defenses. Crazy.
@@nextentrepreneur9288 I suspect part of the motive of the warning was so that the US intelligence services could closely see the performance of the missile
“We knew there would be a Moscow response “
We weren’t expecting an Icy BM😂
😂👍
Putin = old liar
Если Британия не поняла намека то следующие применение будет по ней но уже с другими боеголовками.
Вперед Россия!
Освободим Нашу Украину от НАЦИСТОВ И ОТ НАЕМНИКОВ ТЕРРОРИСТОВ ИЗ НАТО.
. Крым😊
What was that? It looks like sky is bursting open and waves of UFOs are invading the earth!
It’s the entry vehicles. Each missile has six. They were all just set to hit the same spot. They can all goto different spots from one missile. The glow like that bc they come in from space and get white hot bc they are going hypersonic
@@rickandbrandonshowscary crap, I've never seen those re-entry vehicles in action, and I hove we will never see them with intended payload
@@vadimivanov3627 No one has ever seen them. This was a world's first. Scary.
Super Mions?
Clothes for 30 independent Warheads descending to Earth from one missile in space
You guys have no idea how much Russia is holding back by not using its high-tech weapons.
You're deluded.
LOL
LMAO, Russia's "high-tech" is 1980s junk
They use them They would have them returned 💁♂️
They're too expensive to replace. Russia can't afford a High tech war.
Don't test the patience of Vladimir Putin.
Don't suck his balls that much.
The launch of a russian missile with a nuclear charge would not be accurate, since nuclear fuel is used up every second, with a large warhead load it may not hit the target exactly, so it could be a small charge not 50 tons, as the Russian media lie, but much smaller, so that it would not hit the target at all. A dummy with fuel was flying along the Dnieper and therefore it flew a long distance, using up the fuel. The launch of such a missile is determined by a special distance and not from different sides, it is determined, for example, by the nearest border, and not from central Russia. All launches in Russia are monitored by satellites.
@@piano.k26nuclear charge and nuclear fuel are different 😂. Are you have knowledge about nuclear? 😂
@@unknowndivision170 Sorry, misspoke
@@unknowndivision170 experts"The launch of a Russian missile, if it were flying with a nuclear charge, would not hit the target, since solid fuel is consumed every second, with a large charge load of 1-50 tons of warhead, it does not reach the target at all. Russia closed this project in 2018, fearing its testing. Only the fuel tank reached the Dnieper, which means it flew a long distance. The US, UK and France have intercontinental nuclear missiles that have been tested and hit the target."
CNN headline: Ukraine claims Russia Launched ICBM.
CNN reporter says: Ukraine doesn't know what it was!
Well it wasn’t a washing machine launched by catapult
It doesn't matter what it was, the main thing is that the air defense didn't work. This is the Yuzhmash plant, an object of strategic importance, it produced missiles.
@@АлександрФилиппов-о4э Amazing the number of projectiles coming from one missile.
Das ist die letzte Warnung
LMAO where are those guys who said Russia nuclear missiles none of them work?
It appears this missile works just fine, and very precise. Look at the lovely impacts in that darkened area! Beautiful!
These guys think that Russia is some jungle... it's funny.
In general... Russia is technological country, much more so than many other countries, even modern 5nm electronics are impossible without Russian sapphire matrices(only in Russia technology and lowest world seismic activity allow them to be produced). Russia is also world leader in carbon nanotubes production for flexible electronics
iPhone screens are thin and durable because Russians came up with technology for producing artificial sapphires for flat screens; they even had a direct contract with Apple in 2015, then began supplying sapphires through Chinese companies, during the sanctions.
If all countries worked together and without sanctions, we would have built a much better civilization than we have now.
russia never demonstrated the nukes it inherited still work. They are quite expensive to maintain and russia is one of the most corrupt countries on the planet...
@@industreeyaNone of russia's weapon systems would work without Western components.
It was a washing machine 😋🤭
Because they stole Ukraine washing machines and toilets because the Russians soldiers can afford their own.
Успейте Попрощаться с родными.
Nuclear shovel model 666.
the West have washing machines, much better than ruSSia
Yes they run out of missiles and start launching friggen appliances 😂😂😂
I could not discern... was it shovel or washing machine?
didnt know that shovels could fly this fast
Hey Ivan
@@ajc5479 Hey there Jake! Those shovels can cross continents equiped with nuclear capabilities. Greetings to good old Joe!
@@Blankarte OH Hello Ivan mark 2
@@ajc5479 So everyone who isnt supporting faking ukraine is an ivan? Stfu bro I live in NC and i know literally no people who support spending more money on this disaster. But if Im Ivan what are you? Ivano or whatever ukranian version of ivan is lmao.
@@ajc5479halo basic John
Russia has a right to defend itself. Just like Israel
russia forfeited all rights when it attacked Ukraine.
It was the first time EVER that Ukraine attacked Moscow with missiles, they were doing that to us every day with around 10 missiles and 100 shaheds
@@iba278 dont lie! They attack the Russians daily- with western drones, with westetn tanks etc.
They invaded the Kursk region..
It was not an attack by Ukraine. Ukraine has not technical capability to use these weapons. The US is responsible for the targeting, satellite guiding, and operation of the missiles, and ukraines merely pressed a button at most. It was basically an U.S./NATO attack on Russia
My friend sent me this. Russia considers itself entitled to use weapons against military installations of countries that allow the use of their weapons against the Russian Federation. This was stated by President Vladimir Putin.
"And in case of escalation of aggressive actions, we will respond just as decisively and in a mirror manner. I recommend that the ruling elites of those countries that have plans to use their military contingents against Russia seriously think about this," he said.
The Head of State stressed that there are no means of countering such weapons as the Hazel Bush. Missiles attack targets at a speed of 2.5-3 km per second. Western systems cannot intercept them.
And neither can Russia btw, they aren’t the only nation with ICBM’s. How long before the Ukrainians build their own hm? It was a Ukrainian who is considered the father of the soviet unions space program 🤔
Это гиперзвук, 10 махов. Орешник.
@@kylegill4932 Approximately 100-200 years.
@@temniykot they have nuclear power plants…… they have practical experience designing and building weapons. Ukrainians are famous for leading the field in the Soviet Unions space program lol. They could design and build an icbm in months if they are desperate 👀
@@kylegill4932😂😂😂 кто это тебе сказал ? Братья Гримм 😂и
I thought you guys were begging for WW3 and Ukraine is winning 😂😂😂
Ukraine is winning this is a desperate attempt out of fear
Wish they taught sentence composition in Russia
Bidens big smile when he met Trump was that he knew this was coming. Guy can’t negotiate beach sand but will lead us into WW3
Yeah lol 🤣🤣🤣
3 years later and Ukraine is now bombing inside Russia and has North Korean skeletons fighting for Russia. Soooo… you tell me who’s winning?
What did Ukraine expect?
Not an ICBM.
Everyone knew Putin would escalate, it's literally all he does.
Says the alcoholic Ivan from the village that has never seen any natural resources such as natural gas.
@@JeroenvanHaren Every time he doesn't get his way he threatens to nuke all of NATO. Several times now I think he's all talk and a coward more so than Trump.
☄☄☄☄☄☄☄☄☄☄☄☄☄🤤🪓🏳
Don't worry, just a test😂😂
What's the point of worrying? At this speed you won't even have time to shit yourself.
Don’t worry more to come ..😅😅😅… clown saying Russia attack out of fear 😂😂 seriously Russia is scared of clown 🤡 zelensky.. plz stop this joke … where is the damaged picture … clown 🤡 zelensky forget that he made huge mistake by attacking ACTM and Strom shadow …
The launch of a russian missile with a nuclear charge would not be accurate, since nuclear fuel is used up every second, with a large warhead load it may not hit the target exactly, so it could be a small charge not 50 tons, as the Russian media lie, but much smaller, so that it would not hit the target at all. A dummy with fuel was flying along the Dnieper and therefore it flew a long distance, using up the fuel. The launch of such a missile is determined by a special distance and not from different sides, it is determined, for example, by the nearest border, and not from central Russia. All launches in Russia are monitored by satellites.
PEOPLE GET PREPARED
for what?
@ are you serious??
Russia already deploying Mobil nuclear bunkers around cities, communication lines between countries severed, the firing of ICBM’s, Norway deploying 5 million pamphlets to citizens to prepare, and Germany mobilizing and preparing 800,000 troops…. It’s GAME ON.
@@thatruthtae All Putin is doing is bluffing because he know he's going to die too.
@@trainmaster0217ядерной зиме если выживешь
"Say Hello to My Little Friend" ❤️🇷🇺❤️"From Russia with Love"
Don't play Russian roulette with Russians; they are experts in the field.
Spielt mit Russen kein russisches Roulette, Russen sind Profis auf dem Gebiet.
This isn't a table game, the U.S.A. can send the hate their way as well.
Zelensky is the best fool of 21st-century. "They are acting out of fear." This is a ballistic missile not hypersonic missile.
A very profitable fool. There is a video from Kupyansk where Russian soldiers are watching Zelensky as if on the palm of their hand, but do not strike.
If Russia had annexed Ukraine in 2014, even the allies would have been scared. But if Russia annexes now, who, except the US and London, will be against it?
It's a new super weapon. This was only a test.
Bro this is a hypersonic ballistic missile, those little warheads are travelling at mach 20
It's both. MIRV travelijg Mach 20. You 🤡
It's just that a patriot doesn't see flying shovels.
@@Zilong4242 or flying washing machines. Launched by Ruzzian orcs. Donald Trump has a lot to explain! Ree!
Russia: dont use US missiles
Biden: you can use it
Ukraine: (uses it)
Russia: (responds with ICBM)
CNN: its not ICBM, its not bidens fault. Its TRUMPS!!!!
2025 CNN: its trumps fault!!!!
It was not icmb. It was middle range ballistic missles "Oreshnik" without warhead.
Какая-нибудь Британия🎪🐒 с лёгкостью перехватит гиперзвуковые баллистические ракеты, летящие к её территории со скоростью 10 махов 😉🔥☢ Продолжайте и дальше испытывать терпение России...😉
Cool down boy. It's not the real Stuff yet.😜 SATAN 2 is still sleeping calmly.😭🙏
😂😂😂😂😂
I'm with Russia.
you guys see that? its 3 rounds of 6 warheads.. jesus!
Oh boy.... Those flying shovels 😂
i THOUGHT SO TOO...CNN LITERALY TOLD US RUSSIANS HAVE NOTHINK EXCEPT SHVELS..THIS IS A TERRIFYING BIG FLYING SHOVEL
Western shovels flying into Russia 😂
Tactical shovel incoming.
Успейте Попрощаться с родными.
Eastern Ukraine and Crimea have rejoined their Mother Russia, Odessa and Kiev teetering on downfall
There are always fools who think that they can intercept ICBMs 😂😂 the speed of Mach 20 can not be intercepted at all😂
And what is faster than Mach 20?! I leave you that as a homework.
The USA is decades ahead of Russia in technology!
@manzanaresantonio i dunno this is hope or dream 😮
@@manzanaresantonio There are many technologies, and there are aspects in which the US is weaker, there are aspects in which the US is stronger. There is no such state that the US is strong in everything.
For example, from purely civilian things. In industry, the US is catastrophically inferior to China. China produces concrete (i.e. infrastructure) every couple of years more than the US has produced in its entire history. And so every 1-2 years.
@@struvrim7637 Russia can’t produce basic things like a car, a TV, a cellphone or a tractor worth buying in the international market.
Russia is just a developing country, not an industrial superpower. Many companies will have to return to the USA under Trump or risk paying a huge import tariff.
The USA is an industrial and technological monster
You will never see a U.S. top weapons parade, because top guns are very secret!
The US is great at making expensive piles of crap that are just built to siphon money out taxpayers
Wow, these ICBMs hit the ground like in a speed of a blink of an eye. Hard to intercept them.
5 arrivals of 6 objects, a total of 30 warheads
@@bdleo300 Looks like a MIRV warhead designed to blanket a target area.
Just an irbm. Ru 26 Rubech
It's not ICBM
@@bdleo300 Much more than that, check the other videos
Wow. Those shovels are insane
⚡️Российские военные 21 ноября применили новейшую российскую систему средней дальности "Орешник" - Путин
Интересно что телеведущие употребляют😂
Как им весело что человечество в шаге от ядерного самоуничтожения
они не люди
Remember that the distance from Vladivostok to New York is not so big as you imagine, and in worst case the lifetime of new york is not so long....
not to mention the Poseidon nuclear weapon with its tsunami radioactive 🙃
Zelensky is a fool
NO. He's a hero. HIS country was attacked by Putin for NO reason, except that Putin wants to expand his territories. The FREE world needs to stop this now. GIVE Zelenskyy and the Ukrainian people whatever they need to stop Putin.
Russia is telling everyone better not fuck around, cuz you will find out
"He noted that one of the newest Russian medium-range missile systems was tested in combat conditions. In this case, according to Putin, a nuclear-free, hypersonic ballistic missile called Oreshnik was used."
They can't intercept them lol
Wow, that’s super fast that must be an LG washing machine motor 🤯 we don’t have those in America I guess
Slava russia
imagine if the missile was filled with a nuclear warhead 💀
This never would have happened if Trump had remained president. The Democrat party needs to leave America permanently.
Russian bot
Let's see how trump ends this. Its in HIS court now. I'm not hopeful.
@@Richard-mu2kn Um no. Just a guy from Wisconsin with some common sense.
Trump won with a mandate and the pathetic Democrat party better get out of the way.
We need to get stuff done and Trump can do it.
@@Marty_Wanlass I am totally hopeful. But look what the Democrats have done. Look what Joe Biden has done.
This now makes it harder for peace.
@@BobbyORiley 2019 Trump going end the war in 1 day biggest lie ever
Кстати пшеничный хлеб у нас в России стоит 0.3$ 😂 Но если некоторым удобнее думать что милларды, то ок, я спорить не буду. Вам виднее
All these warhead could be nuclear, 1 rocket many warheads.
Reporter: if the US doesn’t believe that this is an ICBM…we should believe that
Me: if this scary speed is not of an ICBM, what could a real ICBM is capable of?
yeah, so stupid
Democrats: “Trump’s gonna start WW3!!!”
Biden: “Hold my cone.”
Russia is not going to deal with the massive losses in equipment I’m sure Russia has weapons we know nothing about you can bet on that
Or not.
Elendsky said: "The rockets will speak for themselves!" Indeed! 😂
We're all doomed all because Zelensky doesnt know how to take a loss
It is not him
Zelensky: Ukraine needs another 200 billions to protect againts Russian ICBM.🤣🤣🤣
DID UKRAINE EXPERT RUSIA TO SEND BACK BOXES OF CHOCOLATES AND FLOWERS!!!!?????😂😂😂😂
Exaggerated report. Russia has no time for fireworks.
We get WW3 before GTA 6?
Putin will say its just a "special military operation" and he is needing help from North Korea and Iran to even survive
@@enolopanr9820wow never seen just more than Iran UAV in Ukraine😂😂😂 not even another weapons😂 and glorious ukraine is being supported by almost the whole world and still losing😂
It was an IRBM. Russia has no reason to use an ICBM given the proximity of Ukraine.
It was a medium-range ballistic missile.
@@temniykotIRBM = intermediate range ballistic missile
I guess this was the new weapon Russia had talked about in the past months.
Did zelenskyy and USA shoot them down or were they in bunkers hiding 😂
We all know Putin lives in a huge luxurious bunker all the time. If he's so loved by the Russian people, why hide?
Lol it`s putin who hasn`t been seen in weeks.
Not much left of that nazi ruSSian bunker in Kursk today.
Did you like the show?
@ JUST LIKE USA AND ZELENSKYY Couldn’t see the missals you won’t see President Putin either lol they were fast throw
@@vrrdt342 we heard the ukraine soldiers are running away like chickens and Zelensky is now forcing men to fight😂
The boys dont wanna die, maybe they should just accept the rubles & give up
Warning ⚠️ shots fired
Not really impressive 🥱
@ yeah agreed would have been more impressive if it would have created some mushrooms
Russia scares the heck outta me. I have never seen anything move so fast and so direct.
Godspeed ⚡
Russia has no problem with people, just western elites.
America can’t stop those missiles
Trial run for nukes
That was not a nuclear weapon.
Ground zero would have been vaporized.
It has a nuclear capable warhead, the missiles fired were inert just to show what they’re capable of
Yep it wasnt, an ICBM is an intercontinental ballistic missile, doesnt necessrily mean nuclear, but it is nuclear capable.
This is a new rocket. They conducted tests.
"Ukraine will Never join NATO because It Will Not Exist" World President Vladimir Vladiromovich Putin! ❤️🇷🇺❤️"From Russia with Love"
This wasn't out of fear it was out of anger. It's worrying the rest of us in the world because this is escalating fast.
A long time West is asking for
Russia: "It was just a ballistics missile, it wasn't a long range ballistics missile!"
Remember USA has enough ballistic missiles around Russia to turn into a parking lot. They have 1000s of anti defense missiles around Russia. So if they launch something not directed to Ukraine , they more than likely would be shot down and hit with the same power or worse.
Росия сила
Очень 🫡❤️🇷🇺
If Ukraine is the only one who saw an icbm we all in trouble
😆😅🤣😂... exactly ...
How do you think Ukraine saw the icbm? The UsA knows what it saw and will later respond to it.
Lolllll.
Satellite asking Patriot: "What was that?".
Patriots: "F you too"
Western official: It wasn't an ICBM, because it technically never left the continent. 👏
Терпению Путина могут позавидовать даже ангелы
Be wary.Dont joke with Russians.
The map doesn't show where Dnipro is. Isn't that real helpful? Thanks, you CNN fools.
@@Jasonsadventures You mean like Moscow?
Это неважно, icbm долетит до любой точки мира
@@ВладимирЖириновский-д1ж Не эта. Эта летит на 6000 км, и у Рашки таких ракет в железе -- считанные единицы.
Agree, it's sloppy journalism to show a map of Ukraine, with several cities - but without the city you are actually reporting on!? Why show the map at all?
@@victorsago на самом деле эти 6000 заявлены чтобы обойти соглашения. Нужно всего лишь добавить небольшой разгонный блок.
Generals gather in their masses. Just like witches at black masses.
Ozzy
The scuttle is the US may launch first, in a first move advantage. Locate in your area where the blastzone may be and be at least 35 miles from that zone for best survival.
I thought this was the craziest leadership in Russia.😁😂
you forgot about the Russian dead hand
So, was everyone shitting bricks not knowing if it was a nuke or not?
You can bet there's still a pool of sweat under the seat of the guy that tracked that last night
That's the worst name I ever heard.
@@Jasonsadventurestrue, that must have been terrifying not knowing if it had a nuke inside or not. That would have made US to step in the war
@@allyourpie4323 😭
That was 100% an ICBM. Anyone that knows how they work can see it.
Why would they waste an ICBM on a short range target without a nuclear warhead. Use your brain
@@nobody4933 For stoping third world war
@@nobody4933 To give nutters Biden and Starmer a warning.Also the ICBM fired has the explosive power of the bomb dropped on Hiroshima.
@@nobody4933its a warning, next time theyll attach a powerful warhead
@@nobody4933 It was a warning, they have around 305 left.
If there was ever a question of if Russia has the capability and if their MIRVs actually worked, those questions should be put to bed.