What are Ontology & Epistemology?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 36

  • @eetherington
    @eetherington Рік тому +5

    Basically regurgitation of the textbooks without breaking it down into simple ideas or explaining it very simply. This is a difficult concept for the technical mind especially when considering it for the first time

  • @aminaibrahim-ali9870
    @aminaibrahim-ali9870 Рік тому +6

    Really clearly explained. Thank you!

  • @ManojJinadasa
    @ManojJinadasa 3 роки тому +6

    very precise and consistent in explaining the subject. Love you soooooo much.

  • @gerardoquirogagoode8152
    @gerardoquirogagoode8152 3 роки тому +6

    great and yet simple explanation, thanks !!!!
    can we say that Ontology needs Epistemology ???

    • @thunbergmartin
      @thunbergmartin 2 роки тому +10

      A year late, hope you have gotten an answer too your question already. To chime in, I'd sa that Epistemology (and the notion that we can gain knowledge about reality for example) is in itself an ontology (a way of being) although not specified or limited. I wish you a great day random internet person! :)

  • @MrClockw3rk
    @MrClockw3rk Рік тому +13

    I can't understand ontology, because I have an issue with the word "being". As apposed to what?

    • @MrClockw3rk
      @MrClockw3rk Рік тому +2

      @Connor Lepp no consideration, because there’s no reference point.

    • @C61-y9s
      @C61-y9s 7 місяців тому +2

      As opposed to non existence; since the word being is by category associated with the word existence. Being gains it's distinction from existence by focusing in on itself at a more intrinsic, personal level.
      Think of it like this: Suppose you are a writer, and you attempting to describe an angry person. To describe him, you would be more likely to say 'He is angry because it's attuned to his very being', as opposed to 'He is angry, because it's attuned to his very existence'.
      If we wanted to focus on the pure idea of anger from this character, we would choose the former over the latter, and for something that is akin to a word like ontology, it effectively boils down to create the most concentrated idea in it's own respect, in it's own being.

    • @wcookiv
      @wcookiv 2 місяці тому

      Exactly. What you are thinking about when you try to figure that out. That's ontology.
      Honestly, and it's perfectly okay and entirely likely that this part is wrong, if you're joking that's a hilarious joke. :)

  • @rajmars
    @rajmars 2 роки тому +32

    Insufficient summary for ontology

  • @ivanjaysalgado5142
    @ivanjaysalgado5142 2 роки тому +8

    This video is full of knowledge. May I ask if what video editor did you use for this one?

  • @DarkSkay
    @DarkSkay Рік тому +1

    Thanks! I'm looking for opinions on the following, quite unusual statement+question pair:
    (T1) "The number of questions one can ask about the world is astronomical. How can {a piece of software} contain all those questions?"

  • @KSAChess
    @KSAChess 3 роки тому +3

    Plz keep going don’t stop!

  • @dudleyserra
    @dudleyserra 17 днів тому

    Thank you so much for this amazing video! Could you help me with something unrelated: I have a SafePal wallet with USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (air carpet target dish off jeans toilet sweet piano spoil fruit essay). Could you explain how to move them to Binance?

  • @robbiekatanga
    @robbiekatanga 2 роки тому +1

    What, then, is the difference between ontology and metaphysics?

  • @Obamnaz
    @Obamnaz 2 роки тому

    I finally know the difference... thank you

  • @omar-f2m
    @omar-f2m Місяць тому

    that was helpful thx

  • @uncleomar5609
    @uncleomar5609 2 роки тому

    great explanation thanks

  • @anilaxsus6376
    @anilaxsus6376 8 місяців тому

    Chemistrology ?

  • @kimbarrett6842
    @kimbarrett6842 7 місяців тому

    👉🏻5train

  • @cyg9991
    @cyg9991 9 місяців тому

    Is not are

  • @PaulMielcarz
    @PaulMielcarz 16 днів тому

    Humans < Robots < Logos < God.

  • @binghamguevara6814
    @binghamguevara6814 6 місяців тому +1

    Nightmare

  • @Gman-j3e
    @Gman-j3e 5 місяців тому

    We were made in the image of God for His good pleasure & only by Jesus Christ can we be saved from our sin & enter into eternal life.

    • @gooddaysahead1
      @gooddaysahead1 2 місяці тому

      Ha! Your whole existential reality...your worldview...is based on one of thousands of religions that was formed by hundreds of different storytellers, interpreters, mythologists, poets, and iron age peoples, that eventually had to confess a church's faith or be killed.
      You've thought this through very well. 😅

    • @Gman-j3e
      @Gman-j3e 2 місяці тому

      @@gooddaysahead1 ? what? They killed those who confessed Jesus Christ as Lord & Savior,Nero burned, beheaded & fed them to lions & christians are still being persecuted for their faith in Pakistan, India, Nigeria...etc, all they have to do to not get killed or beaten is to deny The Lord & no true christian does that,so what are you talking about? Besides that the mark of the beast in the forehead(frontal lobe) is here, neuralink & other brain chips, prophecied over 2000years ago,how much evidence do you need to see God's word is true & without Jesus we will perish, repent, seek The Lord, there's still time.

  • @adaptercrash
    @adaptercrash Рік тому

    Reversed metaphysics, and that was a long time ago, deconstructing all epistimic systems valued through metaphysical psychology, of a human nature that defines, now please kill me for making this crappy video.