Guide to Žižek: The Pervert vs. The Neurotic

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @addammadd
    @addammadd 10 місяців тому +7

    9:55 figure of the pervert
    10:14 fetishistic disavowal and trauma
    10:50 Freudian version (of course)
    11:20 2 ways to deal with trauma

  • @unusualpond
    @unusualpond 9 місяців тому +5

    I work in drug and alcohol rehabilitation. Can attest to the perverse pleasure (some) clients take in repeated relapse. Like you say, it feeds into their introjected guilt.

  • @josephsuruiz
    @josephsuruiz 10 місяців тому +16

    looking forward in your lectures to Lacan's Psychoanalysis. Watching from the Philippines 🎉

    • @justanotherdump-ft5rf
      @justanotherdump-ft5rf 10 місяців тому

      By any chance are you a psych student? ik asking this seems weird

  • @joachim6585
    @joachim6585 10 місяців тому +4

    Hello from Berlin - and thanks for your thoughts.

  • @kkanden
    @kkanden 10 місяців тому +3

    Great and intriguing lecture as always! Are you planning on making another series focused on Hegel? I really loved the last series on Hegel and really learned and finally understood a bit of Hegel. I would love to hear you talk about Hegel's view on law and the state and how it relates to Marx' early work. Cheers and keep up the amazing work!

  • @taboulefattouch4744
    @taboulefattouch4744 4 місяці тому

    Thanks for the elaborate explanation !

  • @shipaoroa401
    @shipaoroa401 10 місяців тому +1

    2:30 intro
    - pervert v. Neurotic (of conceptual usage)
    - their relation to the fetish disavowal
    4:00 brief lives of the idiots
    - 7:18 its obsessive neurotic turning into pervert enjoyments
    - 8:00 paranoia twd content

  • @pr1441599
    @pr1441599 10 місяців тому +3

    Brilliant, thank you!

  • @vanjagruntar
    @vanjagruntar 10 місяців тому

    does anyone know the precise citation and it's place: Hegel - as soon as you speak, you are doomed

  • @FlygandeSjuk
    @FlygandeSjuk 10 місяців тому +1

    Signing in from Sweden.

  • @osoisko1933
    @osoisko1933 10 місяців тому +8

    I'm watching from Hell.

    • @joostietoost4220
      @joostietoost4220 10 місяців тому +8

      This is nice to know, now I'll derive surplus enjoyment from this knowledge once I go to heaven

    • @mistressmandyz
      @mistressmandyz 10 місяців тому +7

      Same (Texas) 🙋🏼‍♀️

    • @X_TheHuntsman_X
      @X_TheHuntsman_X 9 місяців тому

      ​@@mistressmandyz Alabama myself...

  • @salehali3372
    @salehali3372 4 місяці тому

    Ur so good julian..

  • @midtalkpodcast
    @midtalkpodcast 5 місяців тому

    40:06 Omg the doormetory anecdote made me laughing 😮 indeed it is crazy anxious and weird 😱

  • @bobvp9434
    @bobvp9434 10 місяців тому +1

    thank you for your work!
    just curious: was framing the no smoking sign in the back intentional?

  • @akbar-nr4kc
    @akbar-nr4kc 10 місяців тому

    hello julain i have question from you is wishful thinking a form perversion? or neurotic

  • @lilomark2543
    @lilomark2543 10 місяців тому +1

    watching from Mars

  • @ahmedmusa5103
    @ahmedmusa5103 9 місяців тому

    This sounds similar to avoidant and anxious attachments 🤔

  • @bolm1
    @bolm1 5 місяців тому

    29:12

  • @chaosmos24
    @chaosmos24 8 місяців тому

    No church has Hegel's understanding of the crucifixion.

  • @jabrane1564
    @jabrane1564 10 місяців тому +1

    most relgious people do not engage theologically with their faith.
    And if they did they will leave it.
    The sad reality, most relgious people will state that they beleive in God because of evidence and logical arguments.

  • @chaosmos24
    @chaosmos24 8 місяців тому

    Lacan is pure sophistry.

    • @Jack-in-the-country
      @Jack-in-the-country 7 місяців тому +2

      I have many, many criticisms of Lacan that I'd be happy to go into, but for now, I'd like you to tell my why Lacan is a sophist.

  • @theonetruetim
    @theonetruetim 10 місяців тому +3

    wow

    • @theonetruetim
      @theonetruetim 10 місяців тому +1

      Seriously; this IS brilliant!
      Pervert v neurotic.... very useful framing device.
      very useful, indeed. thank u. thank u. thank u.
      This gets straight at it, whatever it may be. per the ideal, the pragmatic, the norm, or the not.

  • @taciprince7400
    @taciprince7400 10 місяців тому

    39:52 was definitely too high to hear this at once

  • @sanammalik7116
    @sanammalik7116 10 місяців тому

    Anyone from India ??

  • @chaosmos24
    @chaosmos24 8 місяців тому

    Telling that these discussions always invoke Catholicism and Protestantism, but not Orthodox Christianity.

    • @thisiswheezie
      @thisiswheezie 8 місяців тому +1

      In this sense, the term Catholic includes Catholic-like systems, meaning it also refers to other Apostolic forms of Christianity, like Eastern Orthodoxy, Oriental Orthodoxy and Church of the East.

    • @chaosmos24
      @chaosmos24 8 місяців тому

      @@thisiswheezie There are relevant theological differences between them though. Zizek's framing of sin is foreign to Orthodoxy.

  • @chaosmos24
    @chaosmos24 8 місяців тому +1

    Taking Freud seriously today? Might as well use astrology as the basis for your psychological project.

  • @Jaredthedude1
    @Jaredthedude1 10 місяців тому

    1.25 speed sounds normal

  • @chaosmos24
    @chaosmos24 8 місяців тому

    21:32 The inversion is heretical. Hegel was a hermeticist, not a philosopher. The that his subversion of religious text is simehiw authiritative rather than one idiosyncratic interpretation is bizarre. Hegel/Marx/Lacan is an unholy trinity of bullshit. Incredible that anyone takes a project built on them seriously.

    • @ViniViecelli1
      @ViniViecelli1 7 місяців тому

      It seems like the only Karl you want is of the Popper kind 😅

  • @randomvlogs6129
    @randomvlogs6129 10 місяців тому

    Why have you deleted your shorts?🥲