Climate Change a Hoax?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 гру 2009
  • A series of leaked e-mails between climate scientists is casting a cloud over the Climate Change Summit. Kimberly Dozier reports whether scientists fudged numbers to over-exaggerate climate change.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,9 тис.

  • @samuel10125
    @samuel10125 5 років тому +71

    People forget that the planet has been heating up, cooling down and repairing itself way before humans came along.

  • @orgr3189
    @orgr3189 5 років тому +494

    So you are saying that my organic cotton 50 dollar shirt wont save this planet?

    • @AZrakoon
      @AZrakoon 5 років тому +28

      Lol.....some people are so stupid to buy their sales pitch.

    • @orgr3189
      @orgr3189 5 років тому +34

      @@AZrakoon yeah especially dumbocrats and libtards.

    • @sam-wm2dd
      @sam-wm2dd 5 років тому +2

      @@orgr3189 w o w

    • @ek256
      @ek256 5 років тому +4

      You don't make that much.

    • @iangoldsworthy2056
      @iangoldsworthy2056 4 роки тому

      Up line and sinker...Basically you leave out the bait your gonna get a bite....Guess what you did?

  • @user-qt8zt6zg6w
    @user-qt8zt6zg6w 2 роки тому +23

    12 years later still waiting for the predictions to come true

    • @Quietman66j
      @Quietman66j Рік тому +2

      try 60 years later

    • @bigverybadtom
      @bigverybadtom 11 місяців тому

      @@Quietman66j Sorry Charlie, but you cannot keep pushing the date for supposed climate catastrophes into the future and expect people to keep falling for the hysteria. The Piltdown Man fooled them for thirty years too.

    • @spiritofreality7988
      @spiritofreality7988 3 місяці тому +1

      try 69 years later

    • @manuka7313
      @manuka7313 3 місяці тому +1

      It's April 27th 2024 here in London, it's supposed be spring but it's freezing!🥶

    • @raskeltv8882
      @raskeltv8882 2 місяці тому

      ​@@manuka7313The planet is rotating.

  • @jay7480
    @jay7480 4 роки тому +243

    If the ocean is going to rise, why did the Obama's spend 15 mil. on a mansion on the coast?

    • @MasterEggroll
      @MasterEggroll 4 роки тому +25

      Jay S al gore did the same thing when he told everyone to sell their beach front homes

    • @MasterEggroll
      @MasterEggroll 4 роки тому +25

      Science Talk TV and guess where they got all that money from? Climate change hahaha. You’re an idiot to believe we can control climate change. Climate will change and has always been changing before we even got on this planet. It will keep changing when we are gone too if that ever happens.

    • @olechristianhenne6583
      @olechristianhenne6583 4 роки тому +1

      @@MasterEggroll i know its crazy the real issue is overpopulation

    • @vixymix101
      @vixymix101 4 роки тому +8

      @@MasterEggroll no shit the climate changes, but not like this. We ARE changing the climate

    • @vixymix101
      @vixymix101 4 роки тому +5

      @@olechristianhenne6583 and litter, light pollution, air pollution, ocean pollution etc

  • @zeratulofaiur2589
    @zeratulofaiur2589 4 роки тому +14

    The main issue is: If it is urgent to act, empower the people. Give us tax credits for planting trees. Don't tax us... You just want to grab more power.

  • @cudispazzzin
    @cudispazzzin 4 роки тому +137

    Just imagine how many other things in life are hoaxes.

    • @coolkid-rq8kx
      @coolkid-rq8kx 4 роки тому

      No

    • @samroble7192
      @samroble7192 4 роки тому +16

      Mercenary Holocaust, Dino’s, basically every major war was fought for bankers to get rich, etc

    • @jeffreyrodriguez1913
      @jeffreyrodriguez1913 4 роки тому +5

      Sam Roble and for resources, like Africa’s vast mineral and oil reserves

    • @samroble7192
      @samroble7192 4 роки тому +1

      Jeffrey Rodriguez yes jews love that

    • @bossky_plays177
      @bossky_plays177 4 роки тому +3

      Yes thank you mercenary

  • @joysmith4696
    @joysmith4696 4 роки тому +221

    When has the climate on earth NOT been changing.

    • @duustincrawford2945
      @duustincrawford2945 4 роки тому +10

      The taste at which we are changing the climate is the problem

    • @NemeczeK101
      @NemeczeK101 4 роки тому +20

      @@duustincrawford2945 How are we changing the climate?

    • @charlie8508
      @charlie8508 4 роки тому +18

      EXACTLY. My god. When people say that oh it’s the hottest month ever they are lying to themselves as there is no records showing the temperature of the millions of years prior to scientists beginning to record data. Also, 50 years ago there was such thing as CLIMATE COOLING?! This being further disproven when you realise Greenland never used to be covered in ice. Lol.
      “Co2 is bad for the ozone layer and is making it bigger”. ha. So basically we should get rid of co2 and kill ourselves. Yes, this is what has happened to society. Recently studies conducted showed that the ozone layer while got smaller and was healing itself yet that’s also a bad thing? My god. Our friken scientists are deluded.

    • @NemeczeK101
      @NemeczeK101 4 роки тому +7

      @@charlie8508 Its definitely not all scientists, but the ones that are polled are specificely picked because the polling is biased towards one opinion, that being that global warming/climate change exists, but there are a lot of scientists (who actually qualify as one) who deny climate change (action) like Piers Corbyn, notoriously known for being the brother of the socialist Labour party leader in the UK.

    • @Ronniemc1999
      @Ronniemc1999 4 роки тому +2

      Ok boomer

  • @Blessed_Sound
    @Blessed_Sound 4 роки тому +66

    First the world was going to freeze, next the world was going to heat up, now weather is going to change. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me.

    • @rogerf7229
      @rogerf7229 4 роки тому +5

      Toon She Weather already HAS changed. Burning Australia is so dry, the Amazon Rain Forest (Lungs of the Earth) too. Drowning Polar Bears. Ever worsening storms!
      The satellite weather on TV news changed. Rain used to approach Seattle from Alaska by a slow-moving Counter-Clockwise rotation over the Pacific. Now it's Clockwise and quicker. That made a CHANGE, FOR SURE.
      Last summer the Seattle blackberries never ripened. They did rot though. Fermented premature berries. Blame that on nature? Pretty damn irresponsible!

    • @Blessed_Sound
      @Blessed_Sound 4 роки тому +13

      Roger F you do know that a lot of people got arrested for starting the fires in Australia right . This is all a game to them .

    • @j.p494
      @j.p494 4 роки тому +3

      @@rogerf7229 200+ people arrested for starting fires

    • @pc_115
      @pc_115 4 роки тому +1

      @@Blessed_Sound no no your a troll its impossible to not believe in global warming

    • @Blessed_Sound
      @Blessed_Sound 4 роки тому +8

      PC__ ' how is it impossible to not believe in global warming if the same people who told me the world is going to warm up is the same ones who said the world is going to freeze . And the same ones who said the Australia fires was because of gloable warning when In reality , a lot of people got arrested for starting the fires them selves .

  • @rnelson299
    @rnelson299 3 роки тому +51

    There is no way cbs would ever publish something like this today

    • @fu8713
      @fu8713 3 роки тому +1

      It's no wonder it's still on UA-cam fake puppets

    • @axelmgs5928
      @axelmgs5928 3 роки тому +3

      I was thinking the same lol

  • @iamdone7094
    @iamdone7094 5 років тому +75

    almost 10 years since this was uploaded and guess what? none of the predictions made in the past were right...

    • @jimhaut480
      @jimhaut480 5 років тому +4

      YOU ARE RIGHT HA HA HA !

    • @gmgunnhildr2711
      @gmgunnhildr2711 4 роки тому +4

      Nothing will hit until 2050. Just you wait.

    • @exque5305
      @exque5305 4 роки тому +7

      AnTi-Series ok pal when I’m watching Star Wars 20 with my kids I’ll be laughing at this

    • @gmgunnhildr2711
      @gmgunnhildr2711 4 роки тому

      Auto Nova well, at least you’re willing to wait.

    • @gmgunnhildr2711
      @gmgunnhildr2711 4 роки тому +4

      Give me one example of an environmentalist who has money and power because they made us fear something.

  • @iwantoutnow
    @iwantoutnow 5 років тому +216

    Environmentalism is about making money

    • @Proemed44G
      @Proemed44G 5 років тому +1

      @None your Beeswax what my name is Wow U luv your ignorance dont ya? Climate effects the whole planet! How the hell is temp rise a scam? Think next time...

    • @Proemed44G
      @Proemed44G 5 років тому

      @None your Beeswax what my name is Maybe this is too complicated for U.. But I'll try and make this simple... No matter how much money or tax is taken nothing except real climate chg will actually chg the planet's temp. Since this is ALREADY happened it is not a hoax, or scam, or whatever excuse U try to come up with. Because if wasnt real we wouldnt have man made GW. But since this is real and we R getting warmer we need drastic chgs NOW! EVERYONE has to sacrifice if we want to prevent suffering and that means financial sacrifices too... So ya its going to mean money has to be spent,,, the sucking off the planet resources for free is over, and we need to spare no one's wallet to save the planet

    • @Proemed44G
      @Proemed44G 5 років тому

      @None your Beeswax what my name is Yes I see this pattern a lot... Its sad that your reading comprehension skills need work. I can see how our education sys has failed us. Your faked English skills attack ,and U just dont understand my superior intellect compared to 97% of the world's Scientist phony argument is typ denier tactic.... Its weak it definitely lacks any intellectual come back but Ive learned to expect that. After all, U cant argue with Sci, as U either have no understanding of it or U R in denial of it. 2nd I used your own statements and U failed to back it up with anything! "oh U R just too complex for us to understand your deep understanding of the deep state or secret tax ripoff which U and dwindling few believers understand! Give me a break... I gave U a FACTUAL statement which U could not refute so U deflected because U CANT WIN.... So sad so weak, yet so obvious that U got nothing to go on...
      1 GW is man made and REAL
      2 Its not some tax scam its SCI and its going to cost those who took
      advantage of the planet for generations
      3 U lost here thats easy to see

    • @Account2129
      @Account2129 5 років тому

      None your Beeswax what my name is he's trying to say its not about making money you daft choff

    • @Proemed44G
      @Proemed44G 5 років тому +1

      @None your Beeswax what my name is What part of Global Warming is science dont U get? Academic researchers dont get paid more or less because they say something against your opinion! This conspiracy crap is the real conspiracy in itself! Scientist tell the truth from the natural laws of the universe... These right wing conspiracy talking points are created by ad and marketing consultants just to motivate the science illiterate... Science is not politics its FACT! All these conspiracy GW deniers claim its a money scam R pawns for big oil and other interest... The SCIENCE IS REAL and undeniable BECAUSE it uses proven SCIENCE... GW is real and its largely man made it will get much worse if we dont make drastic chgs NOW!

  • @madhaze3670
    @madhaze3670 6 років тому +202

    Con artists , money talks and BS walks.

    • @MrWizardofozzz
      @MrWizardofozzz 5 років тому +4

      Wait..!! I thought global warming was debunked long ago when Al Gore's predictions ended up not only false, but unchanged..

    • @emptybucket1988
      @emptybucket1988 5 років тому

      Truth that

    • @aussiemotokid4054
      @aussiemotokid4054 5 років тому +2

      JohnFruscianteMarkLa mate the fuckin politicians in Australia are putting 2 billion dollars towards this so called climate change. That’s my fucking money going towards retards that believe this shit. I’m 100% with you

    • @connorkahlke9394
      @connorkahlke9394 5 років тому

      JohnFruscianteMarkLa Global warming is real

    • @louiscypher1001
      @louiscypher1001 5 років тому

      @@MrWizardofozzz - Most of his predictions did come true. Gore was a chump by hiding the time lines as he was doing the political thing rather then being fully transparent.

  • @dereknorbury137
    @dereknorbury137 4 роки тому +47

    The summers in the 80s were far longer and hotter than now in the UK!

    • @iangoldsworthy2056
      @iangoldsworthy2056 4 роки тому

      I reckon last year was a normal summer in the 80s...Normally one good summer every five years.

    • @justinsteel6360
      @justinsteel6360 3 роки тому

      Yet in the 80s we still moaned about the British weather.

    • @channelfive7883
      @channelfive7883 3 роки тому

      @@justinsteel6360
      It's fake

    • @SelfImprovement1111
      @SelfImprovement1111 3 роки тому

      @@justinsteel6360 same in the late 1940s. I think last year we broke that record for the hottest summer. So clearly bullshit.

  • @himgeol1
    @himgeol1 5 років тому +127

    Why mention Obama when debating climate change? He is not a scientist. There are special interest involved to make money and fame.

    • @victorochoa4205
      @victorochoa4205 5 років тому +2

      Jaspal S because at the time, Obama was president of one of the leading carbon emitting country in the world. Governments need to make plans to reduce carbon emissions and the head of state is important for that.

    • @himgeol1
      @himgeol1 5 років тому +5

      @@victorochoa4205 - By the way - what is your area of expertise ? Have you studied GEOLOGY?

    • @Proemed44G
      @Proemed44G 5 років тому +2

      @@victorochoa4205 Obama was one of the biggest supporters of addressing climate chg,,, U may hating him but U R just making crap up to fit your beliefs

    • @darthdaddy6983
      @darthdaddy6983 5 років тому +2

      Because this bit was published in 2009

    • @YougottabeDryhumpinme
      @YougottabeDryhumpinme 5 років тому

      @@victorochoa4205 blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2014/07/11/what-geology-has-to-say-about-global-warming/

  • @Cameron_Greaves
    @Cameron_Greaves 4 роки тому +64

    The earth has been changing for thousands of years. It hasn't all of a sudden happen right now!

    • @awwwwyeeeeeaa2565
      @awwwwyeeeeeaa2565 4 роки тому +3

      It’s actually done the same thing that’s how we know the history of the earth

    • @crilpy2688
      @crilpy2688 4 роки тому +3

      Do you not know what air pollution is?

    • @cyclonudista
      @cyclonudista 4 роки тому +3

      Bill Gates predicted that we needed to be ready for coronavirus.
      Nobody listened.
      Now he is saying that we have to address climate change, will anyone listen?
      ua-cam.com/video/7A4npk1Deug/v-deo.html

    • @collinmcdowell9328
      @collinmcdowell9328 4 роки тому +1

      Cameron Greaves well yeah but it doesn’t change this fast, within 30 years half of all coral reefs have died, rainforests are getting destroyed, there is too much CO2 and it’s causing animals to die

    • @joshgen8533
      @joshgen8533 4 роки тому +2

      Collin McDowell Bull shit, those are just red herrings done by climate change bozos, initiatives to deceive the masses at large.

  • @karlosmartos4646
    @karlosmartos4646 4 роки тому +8

    Government : Climate Change is real, we need to stop it !
    People : How do we do that??
    Government: Taxes !!!
    People : ....

    • @borisbobbington3234
      @borisbobbington3234 4 роки тому

      If anything you would expect the government to deny climate change so the oil companies can benefit and continue pumping money into their economies.
      The taxes are a deterrent to stop people releasing unnecessary amounts of carbon. And yeah they generally work unless you have any better ideas

  • @juiellineau
    @juiellineau 4 роки тому +50

    when the solution is my money, then I'm being conned.

    • @duustincrawford2945
      @duustincrawford2945 4 роки тому +5

      So you don't go to the doctor?

    • @gmgunnhildr2711
      @gmgunnhildr2711 4 роки тому +1

      The solution isn’t your money, the solution is the threat of your money taken so you would take the necessary actions to solve the problem. How else will you be motivated to save the environment?

    • @blakestilltippin
      @blakestilltippin 4 роки тому +4

      AnTi-Series I oooooooh I understand now ....... it’s blackmail

    • @gmgunnhildr2711
      @gmgunnhildr2711 4 роки тому +1

      blakestilltippin yes. Yes it is. The law is also blackmail, and you know the punishment for every individual crime so it serves as a threat that scares you into not committing crimes.

    • @masyaf897
      @masyaf897 4 роки тому +2

      duustin crawford
      Does the doctor tax us for things not our fault?...
      Like carbon tax... even tho corporations produce most carbon...
      Yet it’s BS since the earth still needs carbon it’s a building block of life...

  • @menganak1725
    @menganak1725 4 роки тому +101

    Of course it's a hoax. Open your eyes and see...

    • @newengland9thgen372
      @newengland9thgen372 4 роки тому +7

      Meng Anak I’m trying I just can’t find any solid information proving its legitimacy or it’s falsity

    • @gmgunnhildr2711
      @gmgunnhildr2711 4 роки тому +12

      Meng Anak I genuinely hate smug people like you going around saying wAKe uP or oPEn yoUr EYes without giving evidence. “You’re brainwashed” is not good enough to carry your argument.

    • @joshgen8533
      @joshgen8533 4 роки тому +3

      AnTi-Series I soy boy.

    • @gmgunnhildr2711
      @gmgunnhildr2711 4 роки тому +5

      Josh Gen nope, neither will insults.

    • @bartosh2865
      @bartosh2865 4 роки тому +5

      Your the type of hypocrite no one can even argue against because you can't accept anything you don't agree with.

  • @14soccerplayer1
    @14soccerplayer1 5 років тому +14

    If bill nye says its real i will most likely say its fake on any subject

  • @VariantAEC
    @VariantAEC 4 роки тому +6

    Ten years later and no new cuts to emissions on China or India's part... But remember they think it is real.
    What part?
    Obviously the part where humans have little impact going by how many more coal plants they're building.

    • @samuelzev4076
      @samuelzev4076 4 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/pPRd5GT0v0I/v-deo.html

  • @takakonobe
    @takakonobe 5 років тому +6

    We cant control the climate my dudes were along for the ride. Its changed before and it will change again.

  • @KD-zs8lj
    @KD-zs8lj 4 роки тому +6

    They tryna make us pay more tax/ carbon tax.

  • @willybee3056
    @willybee3056 5 років тому +24

    Going green, is where your money leaves your pocket for someone else's.

    • @hannaarby988
      @hannaarby988 4 роки тому

      Willy Bee huh?? It saves you a TON of money to go green? Please link a source which is telling you that it’s the other way around

  • @boogieheads
    @boogieheads 4 роки тому +4

    And when you confront one of the climate activists they freak the fuck out... it’s funny lol

  • @gjoo7
    @gjoo7 14 років тому +11

    18,000 years ago, where i'm sitting now was under an ice sheet more than a kilometer thick. it had all gone before humans could possibly have influenced that melt. climate is subject to perpetual change NATURALLY!

    • @brianfeuerman1732
      @brianfeuerman1732 4 роки тому

      Sure, there’s natural climate change, but what’s happening now is way too quick to be natural. I’m sorry, but if that’s your logic, I’d better say that your parents didn’t have a choice to have you, because humans have had the natural instinct to reproduce for thousands of years. That’s simply not true. A long time ago isn’t now. Climate change may have happened naturally then, but not now, just as reproduction happened instinctively, but now people choose to have children, or not to have children.

    • @vladimirgurevich8415
      @vladimirgurevich8415 4 роки тому

      @@brianfeuerman1732
      "what’s happening now is way too quick to be natural."
      Sure?
      Can prove?
      Lol!

    • @collinmcdowell9328
      @collinmcdowell9328 4 роки тому +1

      Vladimir Gurevich yeah we can prove. Should the earth rise 3 degrees within 30 years? no! That is not just natural. Now if you don’t do some research, you can go and make your flat earth even worse, idiot

  • @billkittleman9631
    @billkittleman9631 4 роки тому +8

    So I guess when we reach “zero carbon emissions” and plants and trees don’t have what they need to survive and thrive and, oh I don’t know - STAY GREEN!!! , the “Green Movement” will be rebranded as the “Brown Movement”

    • @borisbobbington3234
      @borisbobbington3234 4 роки тому

      Wait... u think plants will suffocate because humans aren’t pumping carbon dioxide into the atmosphere? Seariously??

    • @dove6069
      @dove6069 3 роки тому +1

      @@borisbobbington3234 yes , trees need carbon to make oxygen!! So if there's no carbon the less trees are.

    • @borisbobbington3234
      @borisbobbington3234 3 роки тому

      @@dove6069 so how did they breathe before humans were around? Zero carbon emissions only mean zero carbon emissions from humans.

    • @dove6069
      @dove6069 3 роки тому

      @@borisbobbington3234 whos they? Lol!!
      My point is , we need carbon dioxide , just like shadows need light.

  • @indyj16
    @indyj16 4 роки тому +2

    paying more taxes won't change the weather

  • @piratepete-thetruthisforevery1
    @piratepete-thetruthisforevery1 5 років тому +6

    Fake news...

    • @vladimirgurevich8415
      @vladimirgurevich8415 4 роки тому

      @Delike el Ducce
      "Can't be fake if it is real"
      Absolutely!
      But also other way around is true:
      "Can't be real if it is fake"
      All we have to do is to check the facts:
      www.heartland.org/_template-assets/documents/CCR/CCR-II/CCR-II-Full.pdf
      Suck up and shut up!
      Lol

  • @n2lsu1
    @n2lsu1 4 роки тому +13

    The scientist dont want to lose that federal funding!

  • @vincentperez3442
    @vincentperez3442 5 років тому +74

    hundreds of variables to predict climate change. climatologists use about 3, not enough to make an honest prediction.all they have to do to keep the grants coming.

    • @louiscypher1001
      @louiscypher1001 5 років тому +5

      Interesting.. which study shows that? I'd love to read it. Man it's refreshing that you found some proof. With it you can blow the lid off this conspiracy. Share it brother and you'll be famous.

    • @Proemed44G
      @Proemed44G 5 років тому +2

      @@louiscypher1001 Well Vincent does deal in Sci proof. He has pol opinions instead

    • @takakonobe
      @takakonobe 5 років тому +5

      @@louiscypher1001 changing it from "global warming" to "climate change" is enough to see its political BS and actually looking at how the planets climate changes all the damn time makes me even more skeptical. In the 50's it was a big freeze and then it changes as soon as all that OPEC bullshit happens. The plants are loving it though they suck up majority of the CO2 in the spring time according to NASA. So idk man but politicians like to keep issues going so they have talking points.

    • @takakonobe
      @takakonobe 5 років тому

      @J_C tell that to the NASA models fam.

    • @vladimirgurevich8415
      @vladimirgurevich8415 5 років тому +1

      @@louiscypher1001
      Earth has seen CO2 levels hundred times higher than today. It never melted away but has been covered with ice many times. We are living in a short break between the ice ages. Blowing the lid off this conspiracy does not require one being Einstein. Just not being a square idiot like you.

  • @adamkallaev3573
    @adamkallaev3573 5 років тому +6

    CBC called the man a sceptic not a denier, amma hit the like just for that.

  • @johncalveley6996
    @johncalveley6996 5 років тому +6

    Check "DOD can control the weather"
    J.Calveley

  • @prodigalsun1069
    @prodigalsun1069 3 роки тому +4

    And now look at the big oil influence on these studies in the begining, and after they found it detrimental to their bottom line.. $$$$

  • @vickyhenderson22669
    @vickyhenderson22669 4 роки тому +4

    What about the shift in the poles? Do you think a 160 miles shift might cause some climate change?

  • @jimcorr1518
    @jimcorr1518 4 роки тому +1

    Where is the hole in the ozone gone???? A bit tax is all it is

  • @EndTheFedRes
    @EndTheFedRes 14 років тому +2

    Hmmm. Wonder what else they are hiding or lying about?
    Do you think the deceit stops here?

  • @Lionel054
    @Lionel054 14 років тому +3

    "Climate Change a Hoax?"
    What a silly way to frame the question

    • @lizzyregrets8056
      @lizzyregrets8056 4 роки тому

      They're obviously just answered their question by saying the question!

    • @samuelzev4076
      @samuelzev4076 3 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/fZTTI_0mHN0/v-deo.html

  • @walterpitts1476
    @walterpitts1476 4 роки тому +4

    The bible claims it's caused by the sun Rev . 16th chapt.I think,

    • @gmgunnhildr2711
      @gmgunnhildr2711 4 роки тому +1

      The bible’s timeline doesn’t reach into the present day, things may have changed along the way.

    • @gmgunnhildr2711
      @gmgunnhildr2711 4 роки тому

      BasedChristPill explain.

  • @gladegoodrich2297
    @gladegoodrich2297 2 роки тому +2

    10,000 years ago North America was covered with a sheet of ice.
    It melted! Are you going to blame that on campfires?

    • @noahdaanimalguy7673
      @noahdaanimalguy7673 Рік тому

      No we aren’t, because campfires don’t release as much gas and smoke as coal facility’s and chemical facility’s.

  • @timgarrett2049
    @timgarrett2049 5 років тому +2

    The earth changes on its own every minute...they will never bullshit their way through it.

    • @aravindmk4073
      @aravindmk4073 5 років тому

      Human can never alter earthly figures it moves it own.

  • @vsalukir7019
    @vsalukir7019 5 років тому +10

    All of Kevin Trenberth' predictions have been wrong for the last 30 years.

    • @louiscypher1001
      @louiscypher1001 5 років тому

      Which predictions in which research report?

    • @vladimirgurevich8415
      @vladimirgurevich8415 5 років тому

      @@louiscypher1001
      Probably ALL predictions in ALL reports?
      Did you try to google?
      Please do and let me know if you discover something interesting...

    • @louiscypher1001
      @louiscypher1001 5 років тому

      ​@@vladimirgurevich8415 - Hi Vlad, Look up the scientific method. You may wish to check how consensus among professionals work. have a good one.

    • @louiscypher1001
      @louiscypher1001 5 років тому

      @@vladimirgurevich8415 - Which reports? thanks

    • @vladimirgurevich8415
      @vladimirgurevich8415 5 років тому

      @@louiscypher1001
      Ha-ha-ha
      A louisy ignoramus tries to teach scientists.
      LOL :-)
      There is no consensus among climatologists. Not all of them are prostitutes. Actually if you take your time and carefully read scientific papers beyond abstract, you'll see that most of them understand that AGW is a hoax. In many cases fine print in the articles states things exactly opposite to what's said in the abstract.
      All scientists are people and need money to live. For physicists it's easier because they do not have to compromise their integrity. Climatologists have to make hard choice - live like a lying weasel or face "The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune"
      Once again:
      IS IT SO HARD TO POST ONE!
      ONE!
      ONE LINK TO AN ARTICLE THAT YOU TRUST?
      That makes an attempt to prove AGW.
      What does it take to make you do it?
      Kiss your tuches or kick you butt?
      LOL!

  • @cyruzhrl339
    @cyruzhrl339 5 років тому +5

    Don't let this distract you from the fact that Lightningmcqueen lost the second lap helping someone

  • @gjoo7
    @gjoo7 14 років тому +2

    i'll be naughty here and say that really it's just a freak of nature and geology that all that nasty carbon is now locked up underground. all we're doing is putting it back where it was originally!

  • @redmercury1159
    @redmercury1159 4 роки тому +1

    it is unreal to me. the evidence is right here in our faces and this man is actually trying to tell us were reading it wrong?? how is this taken out of context?? these statements dont leave any room for interpretation. so how are WE getting it wrong

  • @MrOTLChamp
    @MrOTLChamp 12 років тому +4

    @checkyoursources Where exactly would you like to start you temps from?
    You say from the 70's. It was actually coolest in 85. So from 75 to 85 the temps went down. The last decade doesn't show any warming. In fact, it clearly shows no warming at all. And by the time we got to Dec 2011 we were only .2 deg. warmer than the median temps in the mid 70's. -UAH Dec 2011

    • @zigzagzog66
      @zigzagzog66 5 років тому +1

      Waddles Pines evidence?

    • @theshermantanker7043
      @theshermantanker7043 5 років тому

      @@zigzagzog66 Read the pages on global warming itself as well

    • @louiscypher1001
      @louiscypher1001 5 років тому

      Why not read the global temperature averages? They do compile that and it's available on line.

    • @vladimirgurevich8415
      @vladimirgurevich8415 5 років тому

      @@louiscypher1001
      You know, lousy, you can read anything, but after climategate one has to be careful. I've mentioned already that during just 3 years in the beginning of 90s Canada has shut down almost half of it' weather stations. And what a coincidence! Exactly during the same 3 years average temperature readings in Canada skyrocketed 1.5 degrees C!
      This corresponds to 0.5 degrees C of high latitude northern hemisphere.
      Afraid, if they reopen all the stations AGW will go up in flames (or maybe down into freeze?)

    • @louiscypher1001
      @louiscypher1001 5 років тому

      @@vladimirgurevich8415 - Steven Harper the leader of Canada suppressed its scientists and environmental research during that era as his party was heavily financed by the energy sector. www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/canadian-scientists-open-about-how-their-government-silenced-science-180961942/ -

  • @normanrogers735
    @normanrogers735 4 роки тому +3

    45 minutes before 2020..climate change.(.they told us all this back in 2011.point of no return)..All the best for 2020.🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🥂👌👍

    • @youssefabdelaal434
      @youssefabdelaal434 3 роки тому

      Welcome to 2020 where there is a virus. Wildfires and the arctic temperatures hitting 100.4 f

  • @checkyoursources
    @checkyoursources 12 років тому +1

    @MrOTLChamp "was just 40 yrs ago that the scientist said we were going into an iceage" 1) 1970s ice age predictions were predominantly media based. The majority of peer reviewed research at the time predicted warming due to increasing CO2.
    A survey of peer reviewed scientific papers from 1965 to 1979 show that few papers predicted global cooling (7 in total). Significantly more papers (42 in total) predicted global warming (Peterson 2008).

  • @-.._.-_...-_.._-..__..._.-.-.-
    @-.._.-_...-_.._-..__..._.-.-.- 4 роки тому +1

    What if we're all wrong and make the world a better place for no reason?

  • @morningmorgan6341
    @morningmorgan6341 5 років тому +3

    Links? What emails? Where are your references?

  • @TheHencro
    @TheHencro 5 років тому +7

    Go to 1922 hottest year on record then artic melting oh no that didn't happen did it .give us a break do your research

  • @checkyoursources
    @checkyoursources 12 років тому +1

    @MrOTLChamp Are you not shocked that the US healthcare system gives people a life expectancy only just equal to Chile's national helath service?
    In every country with both systems the cost per person is cheaper if the healthcare comes from tax money than if people choose private. The lack of regulation by govt led to the financial meltdown.

  • @clarriott5
    @clarriott5 4 роки тому +1

    When you get a loan for your house you must tell the bank you can only accept a 10-12 year loan because the world will end then and you will be unable to pay after that.

  • @floydcooper3641
    @floydcooper3641 5 років тому +33

    Alright here,s the truth yes we have climate change every year for my entire life I have been surviveing climate change and so have everyone it's called seasons.

    • @immortalsnail-xd7zv
      @immortalsnail-xd7zv 5 років тому

      Cool story bro

    • @MajinMist603
      @MajinMist603 5 років тому +2

      As the spy from tf2 says.” You imbecile! You’ve doomed us all!”

    • @dougoverhoff7568
      @dougoverhoff7568 5 років тому +2

      Every cooling cycle of an extended period is inevitably followed by a warning cycle. In the past, these were always known by their less scientific names as: winter and summer. I guess it takes climatologists to make that determination now days. Whoda thunk? $$$$$$$$ KA CHING!

    • @MajinMist603
      @MajinMist603 5 років тому +1

      Floyd Cooper ua-cam.com/video/UxhUxbaLBrM/v-deo.html
      It’s called denial and your government and company’s are in on it. But ok

    • @louiscypher1001
      @louiscypher1001 5 років тому

      Your mixing up weather (what I see out the window) with Climate change (the chances of what your seeing out the window of happening). Glad I could help..

  • @pmelby4569
    @pmelby4569 3 роки тому +3

    * July 2020 was the second-hottest month ever recorded on Earth.
    * June 2020 was the second-hottest June of all time.
    * May 2020 was the hottest May of all time.
    * April 2020 was the second-hottest April of all time.
    * March 2020 was the second-hottest March of all time.
    * February 2020 was the second-hottest February of all time.
    * January 2020 was the hottest January of all time.

  • @Squarehead45
    @Squarehead45 4 роки тому +2

    MOST of these "Modern Instruments" were located in HOT Areas like run-up pads at the airport, Net to A/C condensers and City Dumps close to incinerators

    • @lampisfun1139
      @lampisfun1139 Рік тому

      My guy… these instruments were measuring tree rings… not air temperature next to a hot vent… lmao

  • @MrOTLChamp
    @MrOTLChamp 12 років тому +1

    @checkyoursources " The lack of regulation by govt led to the financial meltdown."
    On the contrary. It was the governments involvement with the loan process (namely, lowering the standards needed to qualify for the home loans) that caused the meltdown. Banks were forced to give loans to people that couldn't afford them. In fact, Obama was representing ACORN in a lawsuit against CITIBank, for not lending to these people that didn't qualify. They used race as the leverage to get a settlement.

  • @Canastria
    @Canastria 5 років тому +3

    Hang on... Global warming? what about the pause?

  • @brentgivens2837
    @brentgivens2837 5 років тому +6

    Late 70's it was acid rain then in the 80's it was ozone depletion now it is global warming or man made climate change. They have to keep changing the name. I know that there is air and water pollution which needs to be addressed.

    • @dripkid89
      @dripkid89 5 років тому +1

      lol the cycle of lies continue

    • @adamlynch6954
      @adamlynch6954 5 років тому +1

      Brent Givens nobody "CHANGED" any names dumbass those are all different completely separate issues smart guy

    • @vladimirgurevich8415
      @vladimirgurevich8415 4 роки тому

      @@adamlynch6954
      "those are all different completely separate issues"
      Separate issues but same commie agenda, smartass.
      All three part of one big lie.

    • @adamlynch6954
      @adamlynch6954 4 роки тому

      @@vladimirgurevich8415 one big lie said no one intelligent ever

  • @benh372
    @benh372 4 роки тому +2

    in my region, temperatures are most of the times under season normal values. it.s definitely getting colder here

    • @fu8713
      @fu8713 Рік тому

      Wow you’re a genius

    • @noahdaanimalguy7673
      @noahdaanimalguy7673 Рік тому

      Makes sense, climate change isn’t just “earths getting warmer” some areas will get affected differently.

  • @anna.t._7224
    @anna.t._7224 4 роки тому +1

    0:40 why don’t you show a zoomed out version of this graph. When you zoom in like that you make it seem like climate change isn’t real because the temperature is dipping and falling but when you look over the last millennia their is a clear overall spike towards the end. Right when human emissions rose.

    • @samuelzev4076
      @samuelzev4076 3 роки тому

      Anna T29 ua-cam.com/video/pPRd5GT0v0I/v-deo.html

  • @SaberKittyZero
    @SaberKittyZero 11 років тому +19

    Yeah global warming isn't real. All those records of having winters where my area got over 3' of snow every winter are the ones that are faulse. These mild winters where we're lucky to get 1 snow storm that has over a foot of snow is how its always been. God I can't beleive I let the media make me beleive that the seasons are warmer then they were 20 years ago.

    • @mattSinco
      @mattSinco 6 років тому +5

      Crescent Star extreme weather does not prove climate change.. even the scientists that support the theory of clate change state that fact.

    • @brolydab3288
      @brolydab3288 5 років тому

      Don't believe everything you seen or heard on the internet numb skull

    • @certifiedbruh2180
      @certifiedbruh2180 5 років тому +1

      Ok. I see you have an inability to look outside the US. Cities really are going underwater in a matter of years. Take the Maldives for example. They are predicted to completely sink in a few years. The Thai city of Bangkok is not going to survive much longer. You see, Greenland may even be green in the future. Looking at the US, if we don’t stop the ice caps from melting quickly, Florida may be an island and New Orleans may be gone.

    • @lilovde5489
      @lilovde5489 5 років тому +1

      I'm straight, but if you seriously believe this nonsense then there’s no hope for you.

    • @Sean-wj1wu
      @Sean-wj1wu 5 років тому

      @@certifiedbruh2180lmao …. another , "not in your neck of the woods clown"

  • @JohnDoe-kj6wp
    @JohnDoe-kj6wp 5 років тому +3

    Look weather! Time for a tax:)

    • @tracap9379
      @tracap9379 5 років тому

      None your Beeswax what my name is
      Co2 is an insulating gas. Which means it traps heat.
      More Co2=more trapped heat.
      Humans= produce Co2
      Simple as that. Ignore the graphs, fake or not. Use your fucking common sense.

    • @vladimirgurevich8415
      @vladimirgurevich8415 5 років тому

      @VeryEvilPettingZoo
      Look at weather record. When it's long enough - it's climate.
      And 150 years long record tells me that you are either a bullshitter on salary or an idiot.

  • @rusty1491
    @rusty1491 5 років тому +1

    This video is from 2009 which is funny because we had 2 tipping points in 2010 & 2016 come and go. Guess it’s been debunked as hyperbole. Oh wait another tipping point 2031.

  • @DickHolman
    @DickHolman 13 років тому +1

    If you ignore the environment, don't complain when the environment ignores you.

  • @marciitapper9411
    @marciitapper9411 5 років тому +5

    So it's exaggerated. Who cares. It's a real thing wether it is insane or not. If we keep this up, Arctic animals might become tropical animals

    • @brolydab3288
      @brolydab3288 5 років тому +1

      @Mike Wible and what happens if it is real? They'll be no time left to do anything

    • @certifiedbruh2180
      @certifiedbruh2180 5 років тому

      Mike Wible It’s real. Look outside of the USA. We have rising sea levels due to the ice caps melting at higher levels than that of 1950. Countries are going to go underwater. Ok, I see that you can’t look at South Asia. That’s fine. At least take note that Louisiana’s going underwater. In fact, the USA and Canada are the world’s coldest countries. Temperatures elsewhere have shot up.

    • @romeodesilva9408
      @romeodesilva9408 5 років тому +2

      The polar bear population is increasing

    • @olanlevan8470
      @olanlevan8470 5 років тому +1

      The error in 'climate change', is to conclusively deduce that by association/cause and effect, CO2 is tied to warming. Yes CO2 is a greenhouse gas as are other molecules as well. But to prejudicely deduce a sole cause and effect tying the two together is unscientific. And here's why. A satellite can take a reading and input it into a computer model, and earth sensors can monitor CO2 tying the two together. But there is no macro geologic study of whats going on inside the earth itself. A satellite and a CO2 sensor tell us nothing about the internal structure of this monster we call earth. One example, the recent eruption in Hawaii. How much heat was released, just in this one event. And on the topic of glaciers, the Pine Island Glacier sits on top of an active ancient volcano! And yet we have accepted a condescending expectation of what the 'heat' amount should be, to a prejudicial correlation to something we have control over CO2. Its just so unscientific. Now heres the irony though! Yes I do believe man should pollute less. But he should so because its the right thing to do.
      But lets test the conviction of those subscribing to 'climate change', as outlined by the UN. Polluting countries are granted immunity and may so continue polluting and as such 'smart appliances', are still manufactured in polluting economies, and still shipped on monstrous vessels on the high seas back to us, the consumers.
      Another point. If climate change is so serious and of such importance that the very future of mankind is at stake, then why not protect and make public patents that release us from big oil? No, my logic dictates that its unscientific, without conviction, and promotes the status quo, at the expense of the 3rd world and at the behest that consumer nations fall for the claim that the toaster should be able to listen and talk to the washer and dryer!
      Really c'mon people!

    • @koolmckool7039
      @koolmckool7039 5 років тому

      That isn't going to happen.

  • @CelluloidPDS
    @CelluloidPDS 5 років тому +1

    Why are we even discussing whether climate change and global warming is real? Shouldn’t be it be straightforward? Just proves how ignorant and dull some people are.

    • @davecan1103
      @davecan1103 5 років тому +1

      Actually it proves how dishonest the media and the left is on the subject. What they do is conflate climate change with anthropogenic inputs that may be altering the course of naturally occurring climate change. Of course climate change is real and it's been happening for billions of years. The extent to which man is altering natural occurring climate change and the extent to which man can change the course of naturally occurring climate change is the real question. It's the ignorant and gullible dolts that conflate these two very different issues.

  • @winstonledford5438
    @winstonledford5438 4 роки тому +1

    other countries need to do something, not the USA they already pass

  • @zzap999
    @zzap999 13 років тому +2

    @thermalf Just keep replanting trees and you will have an endless amount of carbon fuel to burn.

  • @poopman6916
    @poopman6916 5 років тому +1

    if global warming was fake, why did club penguin shut down and turn into a beach???!

    • @Sophiemolloy2
      @Sophiemolloy2 5 років тому +1

      RoBuddy can’t argue with that

  • @garyfinchum3252
    @garyfinchum3252 Рік тому

    The flat earthers say that as the oceans start to rise that the excess water will just flow over the edge. Problem solved!

  • @checkyoursources
    @checkyoursources 12 років тому

    @MrOTLChamp "so that their readings would measure higher than normal" - wrong again: Independent studies using different software, different methods, and different data sets yield very similar results. The increase in temperatures since 1975 is a consistent feature of all reconstructions. This increase cannot be explained as an artifact of the adjustment process, the decrease in station numbers, or other non-climatological factors.

  • @checkyoursources
    @checkyoursources 12 років тому +1

    @MrOTLChamp "you refuse to look at the fact that the earth was warming far before the industry period started" On the contrary I recognise that climate chnage can have many factors that influence it (since the 1970's humans have been the most likely explanation for the majority of warming) and that past changes show that the climate is sensitive. For warming you need a continued driver. What natural factor has driven the majority of warming since the 1970's?

  • @lelanddoerr402
    @lelanddoerr402 4 роки тому +1

    Trillions of our taxpayers dollars spent will be worth it if it saves just 1 polar bear. Maybe not.

    • @vladimirgurevich8415
      @vladimirgurevich8415 4 роки тому

      FYI
      Polar bears became a real problem in Alaska.
      Hunting them down is being seriously considered.

  • @samlair3342
    @samlair3342 3 роки тому +1

    Many of the problems we’re facing are solvable if for no other reason than we created them; in which case, solve the problem(s) before they eliminate their cause (us).

  • @sandsmine
    @sandsmine 4 роки тому +1

    think how much paper and stationary the internet has saved

  • @su3052
    @su3052 14 років тому +1

    "Hide the decline" is nothing more sinister than the fact that one (and only one) series of proxy tree ring recods showed a decline when the actual temperature readings showed an increase. So this set of readings was not used.

    • @anonnon4737
      @anonnon4737 2 роки тому

      It was both tree ring and satellite data that showed decades of temperature declines. Excluding data, because it doesn't fit your narrative is called fraud.

  • @user-vc7te4sr6x
    @user-vc7te4sr6x 4 роки тому +1

    Like animals tried to stop the ice age?

  • @joegraffhobo-elect9128
    @joegraffhobo-elect9128 4 роки тому

    Climate change used to be called seasons. But someone decided it's a cash cow waiting to be milked.

  • @Aupitsophie
    @Aupitsophie 4 роки тому

    whether or not climate change is a direct result of man, the amount of plastic in the ocean killing sea mammals, and polluting our own water supply is hard to disprove. And all the jungles being cut down and the species and ecosystems being lost as a direct result of man cutting them down. Disputing climate change doesnt stop the fact that we need to buy things with less plastic packaging and try to buy things which havent resulted in jungles being cut down

  • @stirfrybry1
    @stirfrybry1 5 років тому +1

    Hey, Kevin, did you ever find your missing heat? LOL

  • @checkyoursources
    @checkyoursources 12 років тому

    @MrOTLChamp No one can force a bank to lend any money they don't wish to. The door was opened and they took advantage of it simply because of greed. They all knew it was high risk business, yielding extremely high interest rates, but they also knew the tax payers would ultimately cover the losses. Ask the bankers.

  • @lbg5317
    @lbg5317 5 років тому +1

    It’s now 2019 and India and China still doing the same thing. Nothing has changed on their part..Haha Haha 😂 just give us billions America.

  • @onionpacific
    @onionpacific 4 роки тому

    "If climate change is not real, then why did club penguin shut down? Why did it not snow at MY house last year?"

    • @charlie8508
      @charlie8508 4 роки тому +2

      How come we don't have records of the weather from 4.5 billion years ago? Surely, we can't just start taking studies in the last 200 year and assume because a occurring and reoccurring event is taking place we can label it a bad thing? Wake up and smell the money making hoax formulated from untrustworthy scientist!

  • @vS-gk2wg
    @vS-gk2wg 4 роки тому +1

    2020 Democrats forgot about this.

  • @MrOTLChamp
    @MrOTLChamp 12 років тому +1

    @checkyoursources These people weren't losing their homes because they didn't have a job. They lost their home when the loan matured and they had to pay the full mortgage. They never made enough money to qualify for these loans in the first place. In fact, Bush went to Congress 17 times during his 8yrs to try and get Fannie and Freddy to fix this problem. Cont....

  • @lucassimioni1
    @lucassimioni1 5 років тому +2

    Caught lying. End of story

  • @Hermanhusband
    @Hermanhusband 14 років тому

    DreadfulSolemnity: we have a common distrust of the Fed. Not a government agency. Sued to make it go away and the supreme court let it ride. Yes, we agree, this thing is not a good thing for people who want to have a fair monetary policy and free economic exchange. See, we can agree. No two people are total strangers. Thanks for bringing up this important point, but what doe it have to do with a culture that is using up the majority of the worlds resources per capita, and how we stop doing that?

  • @jamesroberts6248
    @jamesroberts6248 5 років тому +2

    Cooking the books.........hmmmmmm. Isnt that what thieves do.

  • @AntonioAio
    @AntonioAio 5 років тому +2

    Everything has allways changed, and everything will continue to change.

    • @gmgunnhildr2711
      @gmgunnhildr2711 4 роки тому

      At an accelerated rate, in one direction that will not be able to changed like it was in the past.

    • @AntonioAio
      @AntonioAio 4 роки тому

      Thanks to God, THE creator, everythings changing.

    • @gmgunnhildr2711
      @gmgunnhildr2711 4 роки тому

      But for better or worse?

    • @AntonioAio
      @AntonioAio 4 роки тому

      @@gmgunnhildr2711 that is a very very good question. I like you. What do you think?

    • @gmgunnhildr2711
      @gmgunnhildr2711 4 роки тому

      That is for humanity to decide.

  • @mapmanic
    @mapmanic 14 років тому

    That's because meltwater is lubricating the contact point between ice and rock.

  • @zzap999
    @zzap999 13 років тому +1

    @collieh1 If God is dead then why did they build a CERNS super collider to find Him?

  • @gregggoodnight9889
    @gregggoodnight9889 5 років тому

    Once again, there is no recognition of the response of the climate to both natural causes and "man-made" (fossil fuels). These two general classes of potential causes of climatic variation are purposely conflated, very conveniently for AGW advocates, and all change is by definition typically attributed to hydrocarbon usage. This practice was enshrined by the UNFCCC in Brazil in 1992, and has set back real scientific analysis of the climate for the last 40 years. Fortunately, progress on understanding the climate is being made in Europe and Israel, away from the corrupting influence of US government research dollars and the "scientific" agencies NOAA/NASA that dance to the political policy tunes of the day.

  • @calife9622
    @calife9622 4 роки тому +1

    90% really happening 10 % bullshit .

  • @aldrich2825
    @aldrich2825 5 років тому

    There are a lot of professors whom built a carrer out of this....ive seen first hand how you can manipulate data to fix on your artocle main argument. Its so fucking sad....

  • @junzab1925
    @junzab1925 4 роки тому

    Ok, let us assumed that it is a hoax, so and therefore the melting of ice in artartica and rising of water level is also a hoax, media - senzationalization or computer - generated?

    • @junzab1925
      @junzab1925 4 роки тому

      @VINNYISSPEED Gaming It's ok, I have it now or viewed the pro's and con's statement of climatologist/ and the likes. So, this is the time to weigh or analyse the issue and of course gather more technical inputs about this.

    • @vladimirgurevich8415
      @vladimirgurevich8415 4 роки тому

      " the melting of ice in artartica and rising of water level is also a hoax"
      Yup!
      Antarctic Ice is steadily growing for several decades.
      Water level is constantly rising at the same rate for 10,000 years.
      All computer generated...
      Lol
      Do not believe?
      Check it out:
      www.heartland.org/_template-assets/documents/CCR/CCR-II/CCR-II-Full.pdf

  • @louiscypher1001
    @louiscypher1001 5 років тому +2

    what a bad piece of reporting.

  • @CelluloidPDS
    @CelluloidPDS 5 років тому +2

    Whatever it is, do the right thing. If climate change aint real, at least it will give you a sign of relief when you did your part. If it’s real, at least we tried to protect our planet for the future generations.

    • @MS-ii1sv
      @MS-ii1sv 3 місяці тому

      That's like the liberal version of Pascal's Wager.

  • @markhayes1769
    @markhayes1769 4 роки тому

    The biggest tax on everyone the world has ever seen

  • @nicholasgeorge1384
    @nicholasgeorge1384 2 роки тому +2

    I would welcome a bit of warming , I hate Melbourne winters.

    • @manuka7313
      @manuka7313 3 місяці тому

      Try UK 🇬🇧 winters, it's April 27th 2024 and its still freezing 🥶.

  • @LloydRhodesBrandon
    @LloydRhodesBrandon 4 роки тому

    Why did they use the Skyrim HUD