@@loko450Thanks! Yes, a very strong aircraft! I had the opportunity as an old aircraft technician to inspect inside a MIG 21. Now that is a really well built aircraft.
Owszem posiadali Su 17 w swoicj jednostkach, do tego użyto ich bojowo w latach .80 XX w. w Afganistanie ( pamiętam że były w dwóch pułkach - jeden rozpoznawczy ). Wydaje mi się, że wycofano je z jednostek na rzecz Su 24.
@@Manius4321. В России их на вооружении нет. Там большие и не очень умные чиновники подумали, и решили , снять с вооружения все однодвигательные самолёты. И списали Су- 22, Миг-21, Миг -- 23 и много других самолётов и вертолётов.
@@volodiashickhman8903 не знаю так ли это плохо. Миг 25 двухдвигательный например но снят тоже. Плохо ли это если он полностью замещен Миг-ами 31 ? Если я не ошибаюсь Су 17 и его модификации могли быть полностью замещены Су 34 и частично дозвуковым Су 25. И ещё, если я не ошибаюсь Су 22 это модификация Су 17 но только на продажу (Индия и т.п.) или в армии варшавского договора (ГДР ... Болгария). Су 17 похоже мог отбомбиться и ядерными бомбами а вот Су 22 я не знаю.
Great video edition. Those polish Su-22 seem to be withstanding the toughest of all tests: the time. In this video they look invincible, eternal. Many thanks for sharing!
@@harrisn3693 I get your comment but just want to make the point that sukhoi doesn't actually manufactures planes its just a bureau for designing and engineering
The Su-22M4 really is not an bad ground attack jet. For an jet first built in 1969, it’s still quite fast at Mach 1.51. Besides being an frontline bomber and an close air support jet, I don’t see any other use for it. It’s too outdated for air combat and reconnaissance, but it still has more then enough capabilities to be used as air support or ground attack jet for infantry. The Su-22M4 is capable of firing laser guided bombs, TV guided bombs, and drops satellite guided bombs, so what more do you need as an ground attack jet? 12 hard points, with an 4,000kg payload, for 2 drop tanks extra fuel will still leave the Su-22M4 with enough carrying weight and hard points to carry around 4 laser guided missiles or four 250kg bombs. That’s good enough to fight off terrorists or enemy ground troops. If it’s not broken, then there’s no need to replace it in my opinion. It can be upgraded with modern avionics, ECM, sensors etc, and the Su-22M4 would be an very effective air support aircraft for any ground troops needing air strikes to suppress insurgency. There’s no need to build an entire new jet when you can easily upgrade older jets as frontline bombers. I wished the US would do the same thing and upgrade some older jets instead of wasting money. There is nothing wrong with upgrading and modernizing older F-4, F-14, F-5, F-111 to be used for today’s combat missions as long as it can drop JDAMs and fire hellfire munitions. These older jets have more then enough capabilities to destroy the Taliban. An good and successful example of modernizing and upgrading older aircrafts for modern day use would be Russia. Russia upgraded their older Su-25 and Su-24 into the Su-25SM3 and Su-24M2, and they are more effective at destroying ISIS and al Qaeda terrorists then the entire US “coalition” is. Russia did the same thing with their tanks where they upgraded 105 T-72 into the T-72B3M for $25 million dollars. $25 million dollars would not even buy you 3 US-made Abram tanks. Would even 3 Abram tanks be able to defeat 105 T-72B3M tanks that can all fire all the modern ammunition the T-90A/AM and T-14 Armata can? The T-72B3M uses reactive armor from the T-14 Armata too. There’s no way 3 Abram tanks can survive against 105 T-72B3M. 3 US Abram tanks with shitty tank crews wouldn’t even survive against 3 well trained and experienced T-72B3M crew members. The US needs to stop wasting money on stupid shit
Well, the T 72 B 3 still has trouble penetrating a modern NATO MBT at a distance and NATO tank crews are often better trained than conscript crews. The russian were more efective in Syria than Nato because they care less for colateral damage... see the videos and you see using lots of dumb bombs and rockets pods, even from SU 24s. So less worry on getting a army of lawyers and PR people to approve a target who might has moved in the meantime and no need to use a 800K superduper smart missile to destroy a group of Toyota Hi Lux. I do agree that the SU 22 its a good close support plane even today.
"Russia upgraded their older Su-25 and Su-24 into the Su-25SM3 and Su-24M2, and they are more effective at destroying ISIS and al Qaeda terrorists then the entire US “coalition” is." - "ISIS and al Qaeda terrorists" are irregular US army. Regular US army is there to support them. ua-cam.com/video/E6ed0ETdpQo/v-deo.html Global predictor being conceptually powerful created state "elites" of traditional colonial powers as well as global "elites". Marxism was created by global predictor in 19th century as a replacement for biblical project. The Manifest of Communist party was written in 1848. Communist movement based on Marxism was created by global predictor in 19th century as the First international in London in 1964. Russian Bolshevism destroyed plans of global predictor to establish new world Marxist order at expense of Russia. "The German political bourgeoisie achieved the high honour of being able to associate itself with the accursed Marxist leaders for the purpose of combating Bolshevism." - Adolf Hitler. "Mein Kampf". Chapter 9
@@ricardosoto5770 "Well, the T 72 B 3 still has trouble penetrating a modern NATO MBT at a distance and NATO tank crews are often better trained than conscript crews." - at what distance, into what part of hull and what ammunition? Russian guided rockets fired through smooth bore cannon can destroy any NATO armor today. "The russian were more efective in Syria than Nato because they care less for colateral damage..." - traditional colonial powers like USA never cared of collateral damage be it Dresden WW2, Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan, Agent Orange in Vietnam or Mosul in Iraq. Russians do not do such atrocities. Russians are more effective because Russian Bolshevism stands for social justice compared to ordinary and refined fascism of global predictor who created traditional colonial powers. "see the videos and you see using lots of dumb bombs and rockets pods, even from SU 24s." - dumb bombs are anyway dropped using precise aiming computer. Today there are plenty of guided ammunition in Russian inventory causing death of NATO officers commanding Kiev junta.
Владимир Кондрашов I hate when any nation scraps perfectly good, cost and combat effective equipment. Would it do well against a modern well armed military, no. Would it decimate guerrilla, narco militias and militant groups, hell yeah.
@@scumbaack Пришёл, увидел, нарыгал и напердел. СУ-22 в своё время был весьма передовым самолётом и это заслуга советских инженеров. А ты и дальше сиди рыгай и перди в диван. Про тебя никто не вспомнит.
Funny you always hear all he UA-cam warriors making jokes about the other nation's aircraft, etc, but the guys that actually have to go out and _fight_ the damn things keep a certain healthy respect, because they are aware that an Su-22 can kill you as quickly as any plane. The reason America has had so much success in air combat is not because our aircraft are magic. It's because of excellent pilot training, and an extremely extensive (and expensive) support system of refueling AC and AWACS, ECM, the works. Most of our "aerial victories" could have been won just as easily using an F-4 Phantom, or worse, since the radar support and tactics were the main ingredients in the victory. For all the bragging, there weren't many cases were the aircraft actually had to "dogfight". They were vectored in by AWACS and popped a missile into them.
Also the MiG-15 was an excellent match for the Sabre in Korea. Like justforever said, it's not the horse, it's the jockey in cases like the MiG/Sabre. In a mis-match between the F-4 and Mig-21, I'd want to be in the smaller, harder to spot plane, if I was in close quarters. At long range, I'd take the Phantom. Nothing wrong with either plane at all, just have to play to your mount's strengths and I would rather reach out and touch my opponent before it became a dogfight. (Although for planes I would rather fly if I were in Vietnam, I would say the F-8.) As for the Fitters in the video, GREAT footage. Can't wait till Poland retires them so maybe one or two will get on the civil register here in the States so I can see and hear one up close.
Luckily only America has fictional war stories to use for intimidating possible enemies. Russia and Iran and Korea and China and etc have never spouted off about how powerful they are.
@@Lawiah0 You sure. I recall factual evidence of two downed Libyan Mig-23's back in 1989. Further, if it was all fiction the Japanese would be ruining your party today. I am not even American but I give credit where it is due.
The Fitter rising out of the heat at the start was a brilliant way to start the video. I like how you pieced it all together to. I hope you got an A on this.
saw one real once in a meeting in Buochs / Switzerland in '95 I think, I was chocked to see him so easy in the verticals, looked to be quite a powerful war machine. Hopefully no to be used for real as I wouldn't be like to be on the receiving end.
1:31 I wonder how difficult it was to fly these in in formation in different configurations, especially with the one configured for high speed flight on the inside of the turn? I do like how when the wings are swept, it still retains the basic planform of the Su-7 that it evolved from. Great footage captured of an endangered species before they are gone from the skies forever. (IIRC, Poland is now the only country still flying it. Hopefully when they finally do get retired someone can get one or two over to the U.S. as civil registered jets for airshow duty!) I would like to see more footage of behind the scenes maintenance like gun loading, (a very brief clip was shown here) landing gear retraction tests (The main landing gear on the Fitter is intriguing, it seems to retract into a space smaller than it should fit in!) and engine removal. (I surmise the entire rear fuselage is removed to extract the engine like most other early jet fighters.) I's also like to see footage of the jets with no music, just the raw sound of the planes. What amazes me about every plane in this video is that they still look brand new! You can tell that they are well looked after as a classic jet should be!
olek b all weapons are dangerous specially those older weapons of russia as they said you dont have to shoot them because nthey will going to explode by themselve but when pres putin became president things has change they improve a lot
Actually is was more like Russia answer to the Jaguar, but yes, both the Lightning and the Su 17/22 has this nose intake brutishness that actually looks good.
John Wayne dozens of F-14 lay on the botttoms of Pacific and Atlantic ocean because of engine failures and problems with hydraulic. Some of the blowed up mid air by itself.
These aircraft are beautifully maintained. Classic lines and as tough as nails.
Richard Dyson and stiil it does job
Пример с гвоздем очень четкий
@@loko450Thanks! Yes, a very strong aircraft! I had the opportunity as an old aircraft technician to inspect inside a MIG 21. Now that is a really well built aircraft.
It is a testament to the basic design of the Su-17/Su-22 that the aircraft is still in active service 50 years after its adoption.
В разных странах да, а в России их на вооружении к сожалению уже нет.
@@volodiashickhman8903 the airframes were probably were probably expired decades ago
Maszyna obłędnie piękna.. prawdziwie szturmowa. Nic zbędnego, sama czysta gracja. Cieszę się że mam możliwość być drobinką w remoncie sprężarki AŁ
Owszem posiadali Su 17 w swoicj jednostkach, do tego użyto ich bojowo w latach .80 XX w. w Afganistanie ( pamiętam że były w dwóch pułkach - jeden rozpoznawczy ). Wydaje mi się, że wycofano je z jednostek na rzecz Su 24.
@@Manius4321. В России их на вооружении нет. Там большие и не очень умные чиновники подумали,
и решили , снять с вооружения все однодвигательные самолёты. И списали Су- 22, Миг-21, Миг -- 23
и много других самолётов и вертолётов.
@@volodiashickhman8903 не знаю так ли это плохо. Миг 25 двухдвигательный например но снят тоже. Плохо ли это если он полностью замещен Миг-ами 31 ? Если я не ошибаюсь Су 17 и его модификации могли быть полностью замещены Су 34 и частично дозвуковым Су 25.
И ещё, если я не ошибаюсь Су 22 это модификация Су 17 но только на продажу (Индия и т.п.) или в армии варшавского договора (ГДР ... Болгария). Су 17 похоже мог отбомбиться и ядерными бомбами а вот Су 22 я не знаю.
obrzydliwa.. jak 50 letnia dziwka.
Great video edition. Those polish Su-22 seem to be withstanding the toughest of all tests: the time. In this video they look invincible, eternal. Many thanks for sharing!
My God what a beautiful plane. Bravo Lars...bravo.
great job for Polish Air Force for keaping them such a great condition! !!!
Agreed.
Thank Sukhoi for making these aircraft like Honda cars. Cheap and Reliable as a hammer.
@@harrisn3693 I get your comment but just want to make the point that sukhoi doesn't actually manufactures planes its just a bureau for designing and engineering
Нет, потому что Русские салолеты лучшие в мире!
The Su-22M4 really is not an bad ground attack jet. For an jet first built in 1969, it’s still quite fast at Mach 1.51. Besides being an frontline bomber and an close air support jet, I don’t see any other use for it. It’s too outdated for air combat and reconnaissance, but it still has more then enough capabilities to be used as air support or ground attack jet for infantry. The Su-22M4 is capable of firing laser guided bombs, TV guided bombs, and drops satellite guided bombs, so what more do you need as an ground attack jet? 12 hard points, with an 4,000kg payload, for 2 drop tanks extra fuel will still leave the Su-22M4 with enough carrying weight and hard points to carry around 4 laser guided missiles or four 250kg bombs. That’s good enough to fight off terrorists or enemy ground troops. If it’s not broken, then there’s no need to replace it in my opinion. It can be upgraded with modern avionics, ECM, sensors etc, and the Su-22M4 would be an very effective air support aircraft for any ground troops needing air strikes to suppress insurgency. There’s no need to build an entire new jet when you can easily upgrade older jets as frontline bombers. I wished the US would do the same thing and upgrade some older jets instead of wasting money. There is nothing wrong with upgrading and modernizing older F-4, F-14, F-5, F-111 to be used for today’s combat missions as long as it can drop JDAMs and fire hellfire munitions. These older jets have more then enough capabilities to destroy the Taliban. An good and successful example of modernizing and upgrading older aircrafts for modern day use would be Russia. Russia upgraded their older Su-25 and Su-24 into the Su-25SM3 and Su-24M2, and they are more effective at destroying ISIS and al Qaeda terrorists then the entire US “coalition” is. Russia did the same thing with their tanks where they upgraded 105 T-72 into the T-72B3M for $25 million dollars. $25 million dollars would not even buy you 3 US-made Abram tanks. Would even 3 Abram tanks be able to defeat 105 T-72B3M tanks that can all fire all the modern ammunition the T-90A/AM and T-14 Armata can? The T-72B3M uses reactive armor from the T-14 Armata too. There’s no way 3 Abram tanks can survive against 105 T-72B3M. 3 US Abram tanks with shitty tank crews wouldn’t even survive against 3 well trained and experienced T-72B3M crew members. The US needs to stop wasting money on stupid shit
Well, the T 72 B 3 still has trouble penetrating a modern NATO MBT at a distance and NATO tank crews are often better trained than conscript crews. The russian were more efective in Syria than Nato because they care less for colateral damage... see the videos and you see using lots of dumb bombs and rockets pods, even from SU 24s. So less worry on getting a army of lawyers and PR people to approve a target who might has moved in the meantime and no need to use a 800K superduper smart missile to destroy a group of Toyota Hi Lux. I do agree that the SU 22 its a good close support plane even today.
"Russia upgraded their older Su-25 and Su-24 into the Su-25SM3 and Su-24M2, and they are more effective at destroying ISIS and al Qaeda terrorists then the entire US “coalition” is." -
"ISIS and al Qaeda terrorists" are irregular US army. Regular US army is there to support them. ua-cam.com/video/E6ed0ETdpQo/v-deo.html
Global predictor being conceptually powerful created state "elites" of traditional colonial powers as well as global "elites". Marxism was created by global predictor in 19th century as a replacement for biblical project. The Manifest of Communist party was written in 1848. Communist movement based on Marxism was created by global predictor in 19th century as the First international in London in 1964. Russian Bolshevism destroyed plans of global predictor to establish new world Marxist order at expense of Russia.
"The German political bourgeoisie achieved the high honour of being able to associate
itself with the accursed Marxist leaders for the purpose of combating Bolshevism."
- Adolf Hitler. "Mein Kampf". Chapter 9
@@ricardosoto5770 "Well, the T 72 B 3 still has trouble penetrating a modern NATO MBT at a distance and NATO tank crews are often better trained than conscript crews." -
at what distance, into what part of hull and what ammunition? Russian guided rockets fired through smooth bore cannon can destroy any NATO armor today.
"The russian were more efective in Syria than Nato because they care less for colateral damage..." -
traditional colonial powers like USA never cared of collateral damage be it Dresden WW2, Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan, Agent Orange in Vietnam or Mosul in Iraq. Russians do not do such atrocities. Russians are more effective because Russian Bolshevism stands for social justice compared to ordinary and refined fascism of global predictor who created traditional colonial powers.
"see the videos and you see using lots of dumb bombs and rockets pods, even from SU 24s." -
dumb bombs are anyway dropped using precise aiming computer. Today there are plenty of guided ammunition in Russian inventory causing death of NATO officers commanding Kiev junta.
Like You See The Future,See what Happens Now, Abrams, Leopards and Challenger Been Blown to Stone Age and Mig-31 keep Sniping and Targeting.
Dziś nad okolicami bdg i sól kuj, miło było popatrzeć, klasa panowie!
I think it is my fav plane. For nearly whole 90's these beauties from Pila aerodrom got loop over my house. Low passes were very often :)
It's sad our (russian) military scrapped that planes. I just like that plane.
Владимир Кондрашов I hate when any nation scraps perfectly good, cost and combat effective equipment. Would it do well against a modern well armed military, no. Would it decimate guerrilla, narco militias and militant groups, hell yeah.
Привет из России ! - простой русский народ не хочет войны.
Су-22 наследие и слава СССР
когда появляется РЕАЛЬНЫЙ противник с пво - су22 идет вслед за совком xd
@scumbaack совок это ты
@@scumbaack Пришёл, увидел, нарыгал и напердел. СУ-22 в своё время был весьма передовым самолётом и это заслуга советских инженеров. А ты и дальше сиди рыгай и перди в диван. Про тебя никто не вспомнит.
@@scumbaack а реальный противник польских Су-22 российские Су-57
@@Yurkovich поляки ОЧЕНЬ боятся 15ти вундервафель путина, всё так xd
Funny you always hear all he UA-cam warriors making jokes about the other nation's aircraft, etc, but the guys that actually have to go out and _fight_ the damn things keep a certain healthy respect, because they are aware that an Su-22 can kill you as quickly as any plane. The reason America has had so much success in air combat is not because our aircraft are magic. It's because of excellent pilot training, and an extremely extensive (and expensive) support system of refueling AC and AWACS, ECM, the works. Most of our "aerial victories" could have been won just as easily using an F-4 Phantom, or worse, since the radar support and tactics were the main ingredients in the victory. For all the bragging, there weren't many cases were the aircraft actually had to "dogfight". They were vectored in by AWACS and popped a missile into them.
Also the MiG-15 was an excellent match for the Sabre in Korea. Like justforever said, it's not the horse, it's the jockey in cases like the MiG/Sabre. In a mis-match between the F-4 and Mig-21, I'd want to be in the smaller, harder to spot plane, if I was in close quarters. At long range, I'd take the Phantom. Nothing wrong with either plane at all, just have to play to your mount's strengths and I would rather reach out and touch my opponent before it became a dogfight. (Although for planes I would rather fly if I were in Vietnam, I would say the F-8.) As for the Fitters in the video, GREAT footage. Can't wait till Poland retires them so maybe one or two will get on the civil register here in the States so I can see and hear one up close.
American kill ratios are the product of FICTION.
Luckily only America has fictional war stories to use for intimidating possible enemies. Russia and Iran and Korea and China and etc have never spouted off about how powerful they are.
@@Lawiah0 You sure. I recall factual evidence of two downed Libyan Mig-23's back in 1989. Further, if it was all fiction the Japanese would be ruining your party today. I am not even American but I give credit where it is due.
@@Lawiah0 😆😆😆👍🏽🤜🏽🤛🏽
A great tribute to the great aircraft!
it's not a tribute, we are still using them xd
@@pawelgruca4018still very much capable for ground attack.
RESPECT.....from ROMANIA!!!
SALUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Ларс, благодарю Вас за сохранение памяти.
Красивый самолет. :)
Он до сих пор в Сирии бармалеев на ноль множит :).
Very badass looking plane. Also great job keeping them in this nice condition.
Has to be one of the most beautiful looking aircraft in the world .
WE NEED THE SU 22 FOR DCS
Ok make it..
I’d love to see it in MSFS
Yes it would be cool to have a old soviet fighter for dcs
What a beautiful plane!
The Fitter rising out of the heat at the start was a brilliant way to start the video. I like how you pieced it all together to. I hope you got an A on this.
One of my favourite aircrafts ever! Nice video man!
amazing photography! some beautiful shots
Su-22 from Poland! :))
fajne prof XD
I love these vintage aircraft
great job for keeping them in good shape !
Very nice video!!! Beautiful jet!!!
As a russian i personally love the su 22 because of its outstanding performance happy the polish use it
Nice clip , Polish air force Su-22
In the time of SADDAM HUSSEIN ,Iraq had many fighters of su -22 like this , Especially in kirkuk air base ..it has a wonderful sound .
It is rather a bomber, not a fighter.
@@nowy5 It's both.
Awesome choice of music!
Alec Foster what is this music? I like it.
Gregg Severn gundam unicorn soundtrack
@@greggsevern3277 ua-cam.com/video/BUXh_AQ5xvI/v-deo.html
One hell of a good looking aircraft
Wow Polish jets Polish Air Force.. thanks LARS !!! Nice video well done!! have a nice day..
The music was really great. The planes, the flying, and the video were great also, but the music was fantastic.
And currently they are in service in Tanzania air force command,they are good.
Super film,super muzyka,super mysliwce
wonderful show
saw one real once in a meeting in Buochs / Switzerland in '95 I think, I was chocked to see him so easy in the verticals, looked to be quite a powerful war machine. Hopefully no to be used for real as I wouldn't be like to be on the receiving end.
1:31 I wonder how difficult it was to fly these in in formation in different configurations, especially with the one configured for high speed flight on the inside of the turn? I do like how when the wings are swept, it still retains the basic planform of the Su-7 that it evolved from. Great footage captured of an endangered species before they are gone from the skies forever. (IIRC, Poland is now the only country still flying it. Hopefully when they finally do get retired someone can get one or two over to the U.S. as civil registered jets for airshow duty!) I would like to see more footage of behind the scenes maintenance like gun loading, (a very brief clip was shown here) landing gear retraction tests (The main landing gear on the Fitter is intriguing, it seems to retract into a space smaller than it should fit in!) and engine removal. (I surmise the entire rear fuselage is removed to extract the engine like most other early jet fighters.) I's also like to see footage of the jets with no music, just the raw sound of the planes. What amazes me about every plane in this video is that they still look brand new! You can tell that they are well looked after as a classic jet should be!
Эти самолёты есть в Сирии, там они дубасят террористов игил.
Nice video! This aeroplane is used by Polish army for ground attack. SU-22 covered by Polish F-16 is still dangerous weapon.
olek b all weapons are dangerous specially those older weapons of russia as they said you dont have to shoot them because nthey will going to explode by themselve but when pres putin became president things has change they improve a lot
@@romeololoandrade6116 Watta fuck you talking about????
@@romeololoandrade6116 what drugs are you on?
Dated jets kept in great condition. Lovely clip to watch.
uhu.. su22 is the best of best... will conquest the word...!!
Beautiful aircraft.
Wonderful!!
Very well done Lars!! Keep up the excelent work!!
An Awesome Video of an Awesome jet. Excellent Aircraft!
Great video and music.
To jest powietrzny wladimirec, tak trzymac.
Painted in black really gives it an awesome sinister look.
muy hermoso video gracias mi general velasco, por hacer del peru la primera fuersa aerea de sur america contestos sukoi 22 en sus tiempos
Beautiful looking jets but also intimating if you see one behind you.
As much as this beast is single-engined, I have always seen the Fitter as Russia's answer to the EE Lightning. Majestic and magnificent!!😎🤘🏻
Actually is was more like Russia answer to the Jaguar, but yes, both the Lightning and the Su 17/22 has this nose intake brutishness that actually looks good.
50 year old concepcion but sill perfect and destroaybled
Красивый самолет. И пилоты молодцы.
Russerne har altid været fantastisk dygtige til at bygge kampfly. Awesome video compilation.
One of the coolest-looking planes every to be designed
Great video and music. Thanks for posting.
Beautiful, well synchronised music and video
Please keep making these tribes we all miss them
Beautiful choices re footage and score.
Loved every second - beautiful video
Je suis impressionné par l'état impeccable de ces appareils. Franchement Bravo !
Great film editing.
awesome ! the music suits the video well
Beautiful video!
I love that analog planes
wonderful video and music！
Thanks for posting, they are a interesting plane a mix of New and old technologies, saw one in Russia but not flying
Su-22しぶい！カッコイイ
Tough and classy grandplane 💪🔥
初めて見たかも 何これカッコいい
I believe this design is the best one aeronautical engineers ever conceived.
ive watched this too many times
and that banshee composition worked in...... wooooooooooooo
Znowu Polacy the Best! 😍
Mean-looking aircraft. Love the shape.
Excelente.....quiero mil Su 22 para Venezuela.
El Su_22 ya no sirve y Perú que en el pasado operaba 50 cazabombarderos Su_22 los dieron de baja y los reemplazaron por el Su_25.
Летающие музеи, красота!
Daaamn.. nice video. ❤🔥
Really nice video! Great job.
Какой красавец!!!
Su22カッコいい
Are You from Poland?
SUUUPER!!!
классные ребята! привет из Словакии!
These are cool looking planes!
That's hot 🔥
Really nice Thx for sharing.
I love this plane !!
This jet looks like designed to be in an Anime!
Stukas reborn!
The Mig-21 on steroids. What a beautiful, mean bird
It has zero to do with MiG-21
Cool! Never seen one these detailed. I believe F-14's love eating them for breakfast.
Not really in the same category.
An air superiority fighter vs a strike fighter.
John Wayne dozens of F-14 lay on the botttoms of Pacific and
Atlantic ocean because of engine failures and problems with hydraulic. Some of the blowed up mid air by itself.
Lovely antique.
great !!!
Great video without that damn music. Love the SU 22 and the are very capable for the job.
Great vid and music
An amazing Bird ❤️♥️👍🏽
Super 22 su...Carlsberg..prawdopodobnie najlepszy samolot na nasze warunki
Impressive jet.
По тем временам СССР , эта была крепкая сильная машина. Су 25 и Су 27 пришёл ей на смену.
I WOULD LOVE TO FLY SOME DAY SUKHOI
It's the best video that I've recently seen.
Это лучшее, что я посмотрел за последнее время.
Rusia love u full from indonesia..the best country super hero my country...di tunggu in indonesia SU 35 & next SU
Its from Poland you uneducationed potato.
Looks like fun and a beautiful aircraft