Hey Mike, thanks for all your videos. Def a great starting point for experimenting with expired film. In that sense, I was wondering if you had used TASMA och 50 before? I bought a Krasnogorsk3 and it included 2 rolls so I'm looking references/experiences on how to develop it. Thank you in advance for your help. Cheers. Ilich
Thanks so much!! I haven't used Tasma film before but I know it can be a little tricky to process. If I ever come across a roll or two, I would definitely do some experimenting though. Best of luck!!
I've recently added a K3 to my collection of 16mm cameras. Now in the process of preparing it for a test shoot. I have removed the loop formers and am in the process of adding foam light seals around the door and footage counter. Hopefully I'll achieve some good results with it.. I don't do home processing yet but maybe one day..
That's awesome, Kevin! I'll be removing those pesky loop formers soon, my other K-3 is already done and it's so much easier to load. Best of luck with it!!
Thank you so much for this video and your prev one on K-3! I am saving up to buy one myself and shoot a short film and your videos have been really helpful!
You got a home run! Very good registration. Most K-3's have at least a little jitter (no big deal though with stabilization in post), but yours is rock steady. Waiting for the Super 16 conversion!!! P.S. Thanks a lot for the shoutout!
Cool video again . This channel gave me inspiration to shoot 16mm quicker 😆 that I recently acquired . Now I talk not on rolls or sheets of films I shoot but based on foot 😆. Yesterday i shot about 220 foot of film 🎞. Thanks 🙏
I really 'enjoy' this video. the footage looked gorgeous. I am hoping to step in front of the camera soon myself. Pesky covid conditions and availability of my 'crew' have delayed my plans. I really hope to shoot 16mm someday but it will have to be idiot proof. Like the magazine way, would be helpful. If I am shooting something short film or otherwise I want to be able to pop off a cartridge and another one in
Thanks so much!! I really hope you're able to run some film sometime soon, it's good for the soul :) And don't be afraid of 16mm, it's really not that different than super 8. You'll be on the right track if you start off with the magazines and work your way right up to 100' loads. Best of luck!!
Mike,another good show,I noticed on the film the 2nd time I watched it I let my eyes go out of focus by taking my glasses off. And you can see what looks like a chemical wave pattern on the film. I agree it looks like the chemicals aren't developing evenly. The denser areas along the edge are they at the top or bottom of the developing reel? If it's at the top of the reel it may be a (Surf's Up) wave during agitation. I had a similar problem 3 decades ago processing my own. Sorry for being long winded
Thanks, Barry!! I'm truly torn between my processing 100' roll skills (or lack thereof) or the age/storage of this old Vision 2 stock. I do think you're probably right in that it has something to do with my processing. I really didn't do any aggressive agitation at all and these 100' tanks don't really have much up/down center post range at all. I will say that it takes a long time to get 2 liters of chemicals down the center post, so I really wonder if the uneven is a result of that. I really need to experiment with a brand new, fresh roll of Vision 3 and process it in the dark with the tank already full. By the way, the left side of the frame is the perforations, which were face down in the 100' spiral.
@@Filmboy24 well I guess that eliminates the surf edge. I never had great results with my home processing. Never got consistancy, and you're right about filling and draining speeds. I do think the separate tubs is an excellent idea. My results have always lead me to sending mine out to a lab. Just wish it was as inexpensive as the 70's
@@barrysteinlage6888 Thanks, this home processing racket is tough business. I still have so much to learn and figure out. And yes, if only we could spend 70's prices again on film fun!!
You know, Ted, I've heard the same thing but I've never had any real issues with either one of my K3 cameras. The only reason I usually have to stabilize is when my scanner sometimes produces unstable results.
Do you add the chemicals before lowering the spiral into the tank or do you add directly to the sealed, loaded tank? I'd love to see your results from ECN-2 in this 100' tank, so I know there's hope :)
Hi Duncan, that's a great question. Yes and yes. The RetroScan does a good job handling negative films but you will need to color grade and correct it. The software is fairly limited and the scans are relatively flat. Overall, there is a learning curve with this machine, especially if (like me) coming over from something like a Wolverine scanner.
It turned out fine, pour it into the tank at about 39 - 39.5 * C, by the end of the development the arithmetic average will be 37.5 - 38 * C, drain the developer 10 seconds before the end of the time, and the bleach and fixer are not critical, it is possible in 35. And most importantly, constant stirring
Thanks so much for your info. According to everything I've read, the developer temps need to be closer to 41°- 41.5° C, which is what I've been aiming for.
Are soviet cameras worth it? I know recently their value is starting to go up simply for the novelty of being soviet made but I've heard their cameras still have a lot of issues
Good question and so far I've personally found them to be quite reliable. I think they produce a nice, steady image and the K-3 is relatively easy and inexpensive to upgrade to Super-16. I've not had any issues yet with my limited experience.
Please allow me to jump in. The most informed youtuber, regarding Soviet made cameras, that I know of, is Vario Pancolar. He converts a lot of diffrerent Soviet made cameras into formats such as Ultrapan 8. Very skilled guy. He says that the designs and lenses are usually very good, but quality control was poor, so it's always a bit of a gamble. I know from him that the K-3's are usually good, apart from some with registration issues (usually MUCH less trhan your average Super 8 camera BTW). The Kiev 16 U (stay clear of the Alpha!), on the other hand is a very nice 16mm camera that can be converted to Ultra 16, but chances are they don't work properly. Anyway, you might want to check out his channel. Of course there are fully professional Soviet made cameras, such as the Kinor 16, but IMHO in that price range (you need to find and buy the lens(es) separately) you will get a better deal with French, Swiss, German or US made cameras. The K-3, many who own and use them say the same, is always an excellent choice. Hope this helps.
Yes enjoyable as always , great little movie too . Who needs Gone with the wind . 😁👍👍
Thanks so much!!
I was inspired by your film to go out and make a movie with my Android phone.
LOL!!!
Hey Mike, thanks for all your videos. Def a great starting point for experimenting with expired film. In that sense, I was wondering if you had used TASMA och 50 before? I bought a Krasnogorsk3 and it included 2 rolls so I'm looking references/experiences on how to develop it. Thank you in advance for your help. Cheers. Ilich
Thanks so much!! I haven't used Tasma film before but I know it can be a little tricky to process. If I ever come across a roll or two, I would definitely do some experimenting though. Best of luck!!
Well done. Good on you for doing home development of color film. Inspiring.
Thank you very much!!
I've recently added a K3 to my collection of 16mm cameras. Now in the process of preparing it for a test shoot. I have removed the loop formers and am in the process of adding foam light seals around the door and footage counter. Hopefully I'll achieve some good results with it.. I don't do home processing yet but maybe one day..
That's awesome, Kevin! I'll be removing those pesky loop formers soon, my other K-3 is already done and it's so much easier to load. Best of luck with it!!
Awesome video! 80s all the way! Keep up the great content!
Thanks so much!!
Just bought a Krasnoyarsk 3... ;) Your video comes at a perfect time.
That's awesome!! Best of luck with it!
Great video Miguel. The title is one of those, easy for you to say ones. Liked the whole thing..
Haha, it's the only thing I can say in Russian! Thanks, Pop!
Awesome content, thanks for the camera review.
Thanks, Cecil!!
I like it. Impressive how tight the scanned edges are to the film and how steady they are. The colors look correct.
Thanks, Michael!!
Nice seeing you Michael!
Thank you so much for this video and your prev one on K-3! I am saving up to buy one myself and shoot a short film and your videos have been really helpful!
Thank you so much, Ingrid! I really appreciate it!
You got a home run! Very good registration. Most K-3's have at least a little jitter (no big deal though with stabilization in post), but yours is rock steady. Waiting for the Super 16 conversion!!! P.S. Thanks a lot for the shoutout!
Thanks so much!! I'm really impressed with this new K-3!!
P.S. I definitely give credit where it's due and you, my friend, know your &#%! :)
@@Filmboy24 XD ;)
Cool video again . This channel gave me inspiration to shoot 16mm quicker 😆 that I recently acquired . Now I talk not on rolls or sheets of films I shoot but based on foot 😆. Yesterday i shot about 220 foot of film 🎞. Thanks 🙏
Thanks so much!!
I really 'enjoy' this video. the footage looked gorgeous. I am hoping to step in front of the camera soon myself. Pesky covid conditions and availability of my 'crew' have delayed my plans. I really hope to shoot 16mm someday but it will have to be idiot proof. Like the magazine way, would be helpful. If I am shooting something short film or otherwise I want to be able to pop off a cartridge and another one in
Thanks so much!! I really hope you're able to run some film sometime soon, it's good for the soul :) And don't be afraid of 16mm, it's really not that different than super 8. You'll be on the right track if you start off with the magazines and work your way right up to 100' loads. Best of luck!!
О! К-3 !
Mike,another good show,I noticed on the film the 2nd time I watched it I let my eyes go out of focus by taking my glasses off. And you can see what looks like a chemical wave pattern on the film. I agree it looks like the chemicals aren't developing evenly. The denser areas along the edge are they at the top or bottom of the developing reel? If it's at the top of the reel it may be a (Surf's Up) wave during agitation. I had a similar problem 3 decades ago processing my own. Sorry for being long winded
Thanks, Barry!! I'm truly torn between my processing 100' roll skills (or lack thereof) or the age/storage of this old Vision 2 stock. I do think you're probably right in that it has something to do with my processing. I really didn't do any aggressive agitation at all and these 100' tanks don't really have much up/down center post range at all. I will say that it takes a long time to get 2 liters of chemicals down the center post, so I really wonder if the uneven is a result of that. I really need to experiment with a brand new, fresh roll of Vision 3 and process it in the dark with the tank already full. By the way, the left side of the frame is the perforations, which were face down in the 100' spiral.
@@Filmboy24 well I guess that eliminates the surf edge. I never had great results with my home processing. Never got consistancy, and you're right about filling and draining speeds. I do think the separate tubs is an excellent idea. My results have always lead me to sending mine out to a lab. Just wish it was as inexpensive as the 70's
@@barrysteinlage6888 Thanks, this home processing racket is tough business. I still have so much to learn and figure out. And yes, if only we could spend 70's prices again on film fun!!
Just wondering if you had any jittery images that you had to stabilize? I hear the K3 has some jitter issues
You know, Ted, I've heard the same thing but I've never had any real issues with either one of my K3 cameras. The only reason I usually have to stabilize is when my scanner sometimes produces unstable results.
I use two and a half liters in my 100 foot spiral tank and had smooth edges.
Do you add the chemicals before lowering the spiral into the tank or do you add directly to the sealed, loaded tank? I'd love to see your results from ECN-2 in this 100' tank, so I know there's hope :)
@@Filmboy24 black and white is all I do, adding via hose and funnel. Never did use the ecn kit
@@MichaelCarter, ok, I really don't have any trouble with B&W but ECN-2 is giving me fits!
@@Filmboy24 Im eventually going to try thin eventually in the Morse tank
@@Filmboy24 you did the hard part getting and mixing the chemicals; temperature control only requires a new dodad to spend even more $ on
Great video. Does the Retroscan do a good job scanning negative films? Do you need to color correct much?
Hi Duncan, that's a great question. Yes and yes. The RetroScan does a good job handling negative films but you will need to color grade and correct it. The software is fairly limited and the scans are relatively flat. Overall, there is a learning curve with this machine, especially if (like me) coming over from something like a Wolverine scanner.
@@Filmboy24 Thank you!
It turned out fine, pour it into the tank at about 39 - 39.5 * C, by the end of the development the arithmetic average will be 37.5 - 38 * C, drain the developer 10 seconds before the end of the time, and the bleach and fixer are not critical, it is possible in 35. And most importantly, constant stirring
Thanks so much for your info. According to everything I've read, the developer temps need to be closer to 41°- 41.5° C, which is what I've been aiming for.
Are soviet cameras worth it? I know recently their value is starting to go up simply for the novelty of being soviet made but I've heard their cameras still have a lot of issues
Good question and so far I've personally found them to be quite reliable. I think they produce a nice, steady image and the K-3 is relatively easy and inexpensive to upgrade to Super-16. I've not had any issues yet with my limited experience.
Please allow me to jump in. The most informed youtuber, regarding Soviet made cameras, that I know of, is Vario Pancolar. He converts a lot of diffrerent Soviet made cameras into formats such as Ultrapan 8. Very skilled guy. He says that the designs and lenses are usually very good, but quality control was poor, so it's always a bit of a gamble. I know from him that the K-3's are usually good, apart from some with registration issues (usually MUCH less trhan your average Super 8 camera BTW). The Kiev 16 U (stay clear of the Alpha!), on the other hand is a very nice 16mm camera that can be converted to Ultra 16, but chances are they don't work properly. Anyway, you might want to check out his channel. Of course there are fully professional Soviet made cameras, such as the Kinor 16, but IMHO in that price range (you need to find and buy the lens(es) separately) you will get a better deal with French, Swiss, German or US made cameras. The K-3, many who own and use them say the same, is always an excellent choice. Hope this helps.
Ha, my telephoto lens, can go from, 70 - 300 m.m. It will knock your
Socks off !!