I just re-watched this video and I don’t think I emphasised before just how much I loved your measured and erudite presentation. Other UA-camrs fall into the mistake of a garbled message by speaking far too quickly. You don’t and as a result the information you impart is far more likely to sink in. That’s my take on it for what it’s worth. I also like your ‘peace’ sign off.
i had x-pro2. Loved it. Sold it because i barely had time to shoot due to my new job. I thought about getting X100V but it was out of stock everywhere. I got myself used Panasonic GX85 for $200. Got sigma 16/30/56mm f1.4 trio. Waiting on Leica 15mm F1.7 to arrive. Its super fun to use. It would be a perfect camera if it had fujis film simulations.
Yeah that would be great if they had the simulations in camera. If willing to bring them into post, I’d check to see if Cobalt image has the base profile for the gx85. Their Fujifilm sim profiles are great. I use them on my Sony cameras to bring classic chrome, nostalgic negative, astia, and acros to Sony
I upgraded Panasonic GF1 with 20mm/f1.7 to Fuji X100V year and half ago and to Panasonic G80 five years ago. GF1 was my favorite and most used camera and X100V is quite similar sharing it's pros and cons: lens without IS make camera useless for video and it focuses slowly. Advantage of X100V is minimal focus distance being just a few centimeters and by far superior high ISO. But image processing is different. It's easier to recover highlights on G80, it's easier to recover shadows on X100V and camera has different exposure, Fuji has longer exposure times and less headroom for highlight recovery and that's part of why it has super low noise and JPEGs have higher contrast.
I owned the X100V but actually sold it, mainly due to the focus hunting of the lens. Sure it is in terms of features a great camera, but I found the entire experience not what I expected. I prefer my XT-2 and my ancient X100. Purchased the Ricoh GR III X recently. That little camera really caters for my everyday needs
the X100V out of the box has a very annoying focus hunting aspect that i personally didn't like, was considering selling mine however ended up tinkering with the settings. turns out you can turn off constant auto focus very conveniently, after that it only focuses once you click the shutter button to actually take a picture. turning off constant auto focus also helps with battery life.
I've used an X100 since it's release and even with it's quirks and and the fact that it's lagging behind in megapixels, I still love using it. I ordered an X100V and I can't wait to see how far it's come... if it ever shows up that is. lol
I've owned every model of the X100 since the original. Some of my best photographs and portraits came out of that original X100. I purchased a X100V back in 2020, and like you said in your video, bought and sold. I used the money for a XT-4 with the classic 35mm f1.4. I still look back and miss the X100 though. I often catch myself ignoring the XT-4, I've left it for months in my bedroom. Yeah, it's a solid camera, but something about the X100 line that made me more willing to carry it with me everywhere I went. I'm contemplating on selling the XT-4 and going back to the X100V.
I have owned the X100V and the XPro3. I still own the original X100. The X100V is unique in some aspects, but it’s unobtanium status is fueled by hype. It’s a perfectly fine camera, especially if you like the aesthetic of the analog dials. That said, it’s ergonomics are dreadful. It’s leaf shutter is versatile, but completely ruins the bokeh at wide open once the shutter speed is faster than 1/250 or so - for example, shooting outside, at base ISO, even with the ND filter enabled. The rear articulating LCD panel failed on mine with fewer that 1000 shutter actuations and had to be replaced, about two months after the warranty had elapsed. The insights you offer about the X100V living between worlds is spot on. As much as most people would like to believe that they will use the rangefinder OVF to shoot, they won’t. It is nowhere near a Leica or most film rangefinder windows and focus by wire makes the whole “analog” experience less than desirable, especially when you can just fall back on AF. It’s not quite a gimmick, but it is not as straightforward as a true rangefinder, especially if you wear glasses. If you bought a previous generation X100 and bought the tele or wide adapters, you can use them on the X100V and you can mod them very easily to be autodetected (you glue a small magnet inside the mounting flange -Google it). I have also owned the GR, and I currently own the GRII and GRIIIX. these cameras may be better suited for most folks looking for an X100V but available and affordable, with even more thoughtful features, better controls, and in the case of the GRIIIX, ibis and a longer focal length. They also have focal length adapters and are actually pocketable. Just my 2 cents - most coverage of the X100V neglects some of its less than hyped drawbacks.
Spot on! Not a bad camera, and can be a lot of fun, but it’s insanely overhyped at the moment. You make some great points. On the used market I think $600-700 for the x100f is fair, and I think up to $1100-1200 used for an x100v. I can’t support anything higher than that used, and over retail, even for new, is insane to me.
Finally a video with a more grounded perspective. I’ll add that this camera can be use for professional work under certain situations. Documentary photography for a small client, small weddings… and even if you only shoot street photography but you sell art prints, it can give you an income if you, as a photographer, are good enough. Of course there are many more capable cameras if you want more or different features. I once shoot an entirely national campaign with a 35mm f1.4 and a Canon 5D Mk III, all at f/8. If I had this camera back then, I’m sure that would have been more than enough technically for the campaign requirements. Great video.
Thank you! Yes I agree that there are certainly some pro applications possible with it. Then again, that’s what really makes a pro a pro - being able to make magic with any equipment at hand. Of course within logical limitations - I.e. if the assignment calls for high resolution or fast action sports shots then a better tool exists. Well said
I love your videos! I just rekindled my love for the GR III on a trip last week - and now I’m thinking of selling the X100f for a GR IIIx . I just love how pocketable and capable they are so walking around with both in a pocket sounds perfect for me.
@@Lonnie.G Thanks friend! Supporting your channel as well! The 28mm of GRIII is great to have along with such aperture as 40mm I guess - the wide angles are so addicting! Especially for street cameras like GR series. And yes, the 2 GRs in a jacket are like carrying the air. Have a great 2023!
I wanted to buy a x100f or x100v but since the prices skyrocketed, I decided to buy an Nikon zfc with 23mm 1.4 lens. Nikon is also small and light, and with interchangable lens mount more versatile. Image quality is as good as X100v. Only think that Inam missing is unfortunately leaf shutter
Just order one and I’m excited. For year I have done photo shoots with my Sony and then also brought a film camera with me bc film will always be king(personal opinion). I hope this will be quick grab and go with out lugging a ton of cameras stuff to family trips/outings.
Being a 4/3 and m4/3 shooter for 18 years I gave into the hype but had to wait 6 months for it to come in. Glad I did it's been all I carry for the last two months unless I'm doing concerts.
Understood. I did buy the V when it first came out and so thankful I kept it. I supplement it with a Ricoh GRiii for a wider angle. It took me to sell 2 other X100 Series cameras to realize the V was just so good. Nice presentation as well. Regards…Wayne
A very interesting video. I was thinking to get the X100V and you gave me many things to think of. I am a Panasonic user but you know? Sometimes it is like to change eheh. Obviously I subscribed to your channel. As a fellow youtuber with my own channel I do understand how much important is to have subscriptions. So I did it, because it is nice to help each other especially when we are fellow UA-camrs 😊
Shocker on fuji's part. The x100v has been one of their best sellers. You would think they would issue more, but decided to use three sensors in the xh2s and leave the x100 market empty.
I’ve never heard of a failed shutter on an x100 camera. I imagine other parts of the camera, mainly the electronics, would fail first. There are people still using the original x100 without issue so I think they have a pretty decent track record for a digital camera
I have the XT20 eith the pancake 27mm lens. I want IBIS since I like low light photography. The X100v doesn't have it. I'm going to go with the Ricoh GRiii
The only one downside is the autofocus, in particular the continuous autofocuses. In general, it needs more attention in speed when taking the picture and focus. Other than that, it would be super. Oh, the battery needs to be changed.
Agreed. I never use this camera in continuous -- it works sometimes, but I just think the single point is so much faster and reliable that that's what i rely on. Thanks!
Interesting. I have never timed it, but I do feel like Fuji start up is a little slow at times. I tend to keep mine posted on and OVF only so I don’t notice it much but that could be a big problem for some. Thanks for sharing
@@Lonnie.G after owning the x100t I got used to turning it off between shots to conserve battery life and that method has not been a problem on the Leica system. Also you mentioned leaf shutter but didn’t mention the Q it’s variants as option’s priced between the cost of a hasselblad and the x100v.
The hype is certainly real. The letdown is real, too. It’s not a bad camera. Fuji really doesn’t make bad cameras. But the desperate cling to this one with the inflated value in tow is absurd. Bought and sold mine a couple months later. Its not a $1500+ used camera. Not even close.
And nobody can it buy anymore! I don´t understand, that nobody buy the Fujifilm X-E4??? Its technicaly the same as the X100-V and you can change the optics! I have the 18 2.0, 27 2.8 pancakes also the 35 2.0 and I LOVE IT!!!
It's technically, and literally, not the same thing. Did you watch the video? Leaf, shutter, build in ND filter, and hybrid optical and hybrid OVF are the unique features I mentioned about the X100 line. The X-E4 has none of those things. Not trying to be argumentative, just want to answer your question. The X-E line is great but it's not the same, and that's ok. if you don't value those things I mentioned then the X-E4 is likely a better buy. Another consideration is if you 23mm lens, then the XE4 is not quite as small as the X100 with it's pancake 23mm lens. If you want interchangeable lenses then there's really no reason to even compare with the X100 at all -- they are completely different in some major ways.
@@LuposVoice None of us NEED any of this. You're applying your perspective, wants, and needs onto other people's purchasing decisions. There's nothing wrong with having choices/variety and if we all didn't choose different products then they would stop making them and we'd be stuck with no choices, eventually. Don't overthink it -- enjoy what you have and let others enjoy what they have -- regardless if you think it was a good value or not.
As with any recent Fuji camera, is the only viable way to shoot JPEGs. Really, the JPEG quality of these cameras are just amazing! I wanted the X100V since its release, a couple of years ago but many factors kept me away. For example the cost. It isn't better than my trustee a6000 paired with a Samyang 24mm f1.8 and the Sony is cheaper, has better AF and wider dynamic range (in RAW) and the ability to pick any lens. The other factor is the ergonomics. Again, the a6000 is the same size and it has a real hand grip on the right. The X100V is just a pain if you are shooting for long periods without a strap. And last but not least: the manual focus is clearly an afterthought on X100V. Too small, STM focus ring. You can't do serious MF work on this camera... But i know that there's a certain audience for this camera and and only a few choices out there. The Leica Q (out of the question for most people), the Hasseblads (too) and the Ricoh GRIII(x). Between them the X100V seem like the most decent choice.
@@lacesoutconor Yes. For my shooting style, Sony has better AF (faster and more reliable), better dynamic range on RAW and way bigger lens market, especially for quality zoom lenses. Fuji cameras are only good for JPEG shooting and they have (marginally) better prime lenses. All the rest (build quality, handling and accessories) are subjective.
@@FotosyMas. yea the ergonomics were terrible. I had to accessorize mine heavily to make it usable but I will likely grab another at some point. Used at around $600 it’s almost worth it just for the lens. Wish the second version was cheaper though
@@Schoolofshots1 I don’t want a 85mm look, I want a 35mm f2 look. The Fuji is a 23mm. It will never look like a 35mm even if the field of view is the same.
That’s fair. Overall I don’t think there are many on the market that pull everything together the same way. Just curious, are there any cameras that you do consider special?
I can’t think of a more overhyped camera than the X100V. I sold mine. It’s a prime example of UA-camr hype. It’s a decent camera, but nowhere close to the hype, and certainly not worth the money.
Stop the bullshit hype, the Fujifilm X100 have been great cameras for years. Who cares about the hype, they go back to taking pictures with their phones. This camera is a fantastic camera, ND, shutter, real dials, perfect combo with TCL and WCL. I'm only waiting the next with 40M pixels and hope Ibis for bad light, at F2 sometimes is difficult.
the short answer is "no". There are hundreds of cameras and lenses infinitely cheaper than this camera that deliver equivalent results. "No" is the answer
@@Lonnie.G Hi Lonnie, I must say, I don't watch many YT videos. This was an excellent one. Super well written! (I assume it was written?) Anyway, I also thought the music was a well chosen accompaniment to your voice. I haven't watched any of your other videos, but I will. I also have a question: If not one of these, then what? I have a Sony a6000 that I don't like or use very much. I prefer my film camera. I am new to this.
I just re-watched this video and I don’t think I emphasised before just how much I loved your measured and erudite presentation. Other UA-camrs fall into the mistake of a garbled message by speaking far too quickly. You don’t and as a result the information you impart is far more likely to sink in. That’s my take on it for what it’s worth. I also like your ‘peace’ sign off.
i had x-pro2. Loved it. Sold it because i barely had time to shoot due to my new job. I thought about getting X100V but it was out of stock everywhere. I got myself used Panasonic GX85 for $200. Got sigma 16/30/56mm f1.4 trio. Waiting on Leica 15mm F1.7 to arrive. Its super fun to use. It would be a perfect camera if it had fujis film simulations.
Yeah that would be great if they had the simulations in camera. If willing to bring them into post, I’d check to see if Cobalt image has the base profile for the gx85. Their Fujifilm sim profiles are great. I use them on my Sony cameras to bring classic chrome, nostalgic negative, astia, and acros to Sony
I upgraded Panasonic GF1 with 20mm/f1.7 to Fuji X100V year and half ago and to Panasonic G80 five years ago. GF1 was my favorite and most used camera and X100V is quite similar sharing it's pros and cons: lens without IS make camera useless for video and it focuses slowly. Advantage of X100V is minimal focus distance being just a few centimeters and by far superior high ISO. But image processing is different. It's easier to recover highlights on G80, it's easier to recover shadows on X100V and camera has different exposure, Fuji has longer exposure times and less headroom for highlight recovery and that's part of why it has super low noise and JPEGs have higher contrast.
I owned the X100V but actually sold it, mainly due to the focus hunting of the lens. Sure it is in terms of features a great camera, but I found the entire experience not what I expected.
I prefer my XT-2 and my ancient X100. Purchased the Ricoh GR III X recently. That little camera really caters for my everyday needs
@@-_ch40s_ really? That is a design flaw you spotted. Thanks for sharing
Yep that’s totally fine. It’s always interesting to me what cameras we get along with and which ones just don’t click.
the X100V out of the box has a very annoying focus hunting aspect that i personally didn't like, was considering selling mine however ended up tinkering with the settings. turns out you can turn off constant auto focus very conveniently, after that it only focuses once you click the shutter button to actually take a picture. turning off constant auto focus also helps with battery life.
I've used an X100 since it's release and even with it's quirks and and the fact that it's lagging behind in megapixels, I still love using it. I ordered an X100V and I can't wait to see how far it's come... if it ever shows up that is. lol
I've owned every model of the X100 since the original. Some of my best photographs and portraits came out of that original X100. I purchased a X100V back in 2020, and like you said in your video, bought and sold. I used the money for a XT-4 with the classic 35mm f1.4. I still look back and miss the X100 though. I often catch myself ignoring the XT-4, I've left it for months in my bedroom. Yeah, it's a solid camera, but something about the X100 line that made me more willing to carry it with me everywhere I went. I'm contemplating on selling the XT-4 and going back to the X100V.
Pizza - Worth the Hype?
Nope
Yes.
Most definitely!
No, i don't like pizza
Depends on the topping(s)
I have owned the X100V and the XPro3. I still own the original X100. The X100V is unique in some aspects, but it’s unobtanium status is fueled by hype. It’s a perfectly fine camera, especially if you like the aesthetic of the analog dials. That said, it’s ergonomics are dreadful. It’s leaf shutter is versatile, but completely ruins the bokeh at wide open once the shutter speed is faster than 1/250 or so - for example, shooting outside, at base ISO, even with the ND filter enabled. The rear articulating LCD panel failed on mine with fewer that 1000 shutter actuations and had to be replaced, about two months after the warranty had elapsed.
The insights you offer about the X100V living between worlds is spot on. As much as most people would like to believe that they will use the rangefinder OVF to shoot, they won’t. It is nowhere near a Leica or most film rangefinder windows and focus by wire makes the whole “analog” experience less than desirable, especially when you can just fall back on AF. It’s not quite a gimmick, but it is not as straightforward as a true rangefinder, especially if you wear glasses.
If you bought a previous generation X100 and bought the tele or wide adapters, you can use them on the X100V and you can mod them very easily to be autodetected (you glue a small magnet inside the mounting flange -Google it).
I have also owned the GR, and I currently own the GRII and GRIIIX. these cameras may be better suited for most folks looking for an X100V but available and affordable, with even more thoughtful features, better controls, and in the case of the GRIIIX, ibis and a longer focal length. They also have focal length adapters and are actually pocketable.
Just my 2 cents - most coverage of the X100V neglects some of its less than hyped drawbacks.
Spot on! Not a bad camera, and can be a lot of fun, but it’s insanely overhyped at the moment. You make some great points. On the used market I think $600-700 for the x100f is fair, and I think up to $1100-1200 used for an x100v. I can’t support anything higher than that used, and over retail, even for new, is insane to me.
One of the best videos I've seen on this camera. And I'm not just saying that.
Wow that means a lot 🙏🏽
Finally a video with a more grounded perspective. I’ll add that this camera can be use for professional work under certain situations. Documentary photography for a small client, small weddings… and even if you only shoot street photography but you sell art prints, it can give you an income if you, as a photographer, are good enough. Of course there are many more capable cameras if you want more or different features.
I once shoot an entirely national campaign with a 35mm f1.4 and a Canon 5D Mk III, all at f/8. If I had this camera back then, I’m sure that would have been more than enough technically for the campaign requirements. Great video.
Thank you! Yes I agree that there are certainly some pro applications possible with it. Then again, that’s what really makes a pro a pro - being able to make magic with any equipment at hand. Of course within logical limitations - I.e. if the assignment calls for high resolution or fast action sports shots then a better tool exists. Well said
Nice video man! I miss Fujifilm. Love the X100V + Lightpix combo - it`s my future everyday cam dream. After I break my romance with GR first ;>
I love your videos!
I just rekindled my love for the GR III on a trip last week - and now I’m thinking of selling the X100f for a GR IIIx . I just love how pocketable and capable they are so walking around with both in a pocket sounds perfect for me.
@@Lonnie.G Thanks friend! Supporting your channel as well! The 28mm of GRIII is great to have along with such aperture as 40mm I guess - the wide angles are so addicting! Especially for street cameras like GR series. And yes, the 2 GRs in a jacket are like carrying the air. Have a great 2023!
I wanted to buy a x100f or x100v but since the prices skyrocketed, I decided to buy an Nikon zfc with 23mm 1.4 lens. Nikon is also small and light, and with interchangable lens mount more versatile. Image quality is as good as X100v. Only think that Inam missing is unfortunately leaf shutter
Zfc is a nice looking body. I wish Nikon would do more in the direction of zfc and df.
I’ve bought it a year ago, sold it few month ago for rx1r ii, sold rx1r ii few weeks ago and made my way back to x100v few days ago ❤
Haha sounds like me
Just order one and I’m excited. For year I have done photo shoots with my Sony and then also brought a film camera with me bc film will always be king(personal opinion). I hope this will be quick grab and go with out lugging a ton of cameras stuff to family trips/outings.
What are your thoughts so far?
Being a 4/3 and m4/3 shooter for 18 years I gave into the hype but had to wait 6 months for it to come in. Glad I did it's been all I carry for the last two months unless I'm doing concerts.
Yes! That daily companion! Glad to hear I’m not too far off lol
Understood. I did buy the V when it first came out and so thankful I kept it. I supplement it with a Ricoh GRiii for a wider angle. It took me to sell 2 other X100 Series cameras to realize the V was just so good. Nice presentation as well. Regards…Wayne
Thank you! That’s a great combination
I enjoyed your straight forward style. What a great time to bring back the Olympus Pen-F and jump on the coattails of the Fujifilm X-100V
That would be amazing
A very interesting video. I was thinking to get the X100V and you gave me many things to think of. I am a Panasonic user but you know? Sometimes it is like to change eheh.
Obviously I subscribed to your channel. As a fellow youtuber with my own channel I do understand how much important is to have subscriptions. So I did it, because it is nice to help each other especially when we are fellow UA-camrs 😊
Thank you! I’ll check your channel out as well. Appreciate the support
I got a used X100S for like 1/8th the price of a X100V and couldn't be happier. fantastic camera
Smart move right there
I prefer the Leica rangefinder, but appreciate your low-key, but thorough perspective on this camera
Thank you!
Shocker on fuji's part.
The x100v has been one of their best sellers. You would think they would issue more, but decided to use three sensors in the xh2s and leave the x100 market empty.
What’s the lifespan of the x100 line? Do they brick easily or after a couple years / shutter count?
I’ve never heard of a failed shutter on an x100 camera. I imagine other parts of the camera, mainly the electronics, would fail first. There are people still using the original x100 without issue so I think they have a pretty decent track record for a digital camera
I have the XT20 eith the pancake 27mm lens. I want IBIS since I like low light photography. The X100v doesn't have it. I'm going to go with the Ricoh GRiii
I'm am just so sad that the current lowest price for me is around €1560,- right now...
Thank you for sharing your experience! :)
Yeah that is very expensive. I hope the prices come down soon
Where is that? Is it new?
I really want this camera. One day maybe.
Definitely wait untill the hype blows over. Or look at a used x100, x100s, or x100t
🎉🎉🎉, it’s loaded.
The only one downside is the autofocus, in particular the continuous autofocuses. In general, it needs more attention in speed when taking the picture and focus. Other than that, it would be super. Oh, the battery needs to be changed.
Agreed. I never use this camera in continuous -- it works sometimes, but I just think the single point is so much faster and reliable that that's what i rely on. Thanks!
I shoot the X20, pure fun and neato photos.
Great video, thanks
Thank you!
Bought the x100v in 2020 but returned it cause the start up time was too slow, went with the Leica q and m10 instead.
Interesting. I have never timed it, but I do feel like Fuji start up is a little slow at times. I tend to keep mine posted on and OVF only so I don’t notice it much but that could be a big problem for some. Thanks for sharing
@@Lonnie.G after owning the x100t I got used to turning it off between shots to conserve battery life and that method has not been a problem on the Leica system.
Also you mentioned leaf shutter but didn’t mention the Q it’s variants as option’s priced between the cost of a hasselblad and the x100v.
Great video bro.
Thank you 🙏🏽
Niiice video. Love my X100v!
It’s amazing. Thank you!
Brilliant video
Thank you!
Amazing camera.
Hype - worth the hype?
The hype is certainly real. The letdown is real, too. It’s not a bad camera. Fuji really doesn’t make bad cameras. But the desperate cling to this one with the inflated value in tow is absurd. Bought and sold mine a couple months later. Its not a $1500+ used camera. Not even close.
Agreed 100% . I love that people are discovering it, but hate that the market value puts it out of reach for most.
It’s worth what ever someone’s willing to pay! I’d say it’s worth it!
And nobody can it buy anymore! I don´t understand, that nobody buy the Fujifilm X-E4??? Its technicaly the same as the X100-V and you can change the optics! I have the 18 2.0, 27 2.8 pancakes also the 35 2.0 and I LOVE IT!!!
It's technically, and literally, not the same thing. Did you watch the video? Leaf, shutter, build in ND filter, and hybrid optical and hybrid OVF are the unique features I mentioned about the X100 line. The X-E4 has none of those things. Not trying to be argumentative, just want to answer your question. The X-E line is great but it's not the same, and that's ok. if you don't value those things I mentioned then the X-E4 is likely a better buy. Another consideration is if you 23mm lens, then the XE4 is not quite as small as the X100 with it's pancake 23mm lens. If you want interchangeable lenses then there's really no reason to even compare with the X100 at all -- they are completely different in some major ways.
OK@@Lonnie.G, that´s right but WHO needs it and you must pay 700.- more? That´s what i think abaout! Thanks!
@@LuposVoice None of us NEED any of this. You're applying your perspective, wants, and needs onto other people's purchasing decisions. There's nothing wrong with having choices/variety and if we all didn't choose different products then they would stop making them and we'd be stuck with no choices, eventually. Don't overthink it -- enjoy what you have and let others enjoy what they have -- regardless if you think it was a good value or not.
What brand of flash did you use there?
Assuming you are talking about the tiny one that I demoed, it’s the Lightpix Labs q20 II . A review is on my to do list
@@Lonnie.G Yes, that's the one. Thanks
I'm most interested in that m8 though :-)
Yes! I need to get it out soon! Need more time in the day lol
As with any recent Fuji camera, is the only viable way to shoot JPEGs. Really, the JPEG quality of these cameras are just amazing! I wanted the X100V since its release, a couple of years ago but many factors kept me away. For example the cost. It isn't better than my trustee a6000 paired with a Samyang 24mm f1.8 and the Sony is cheaper, has better AF and wider dynamic range (in RAW) and the ability to pick any lens. The other factor is the ergonomics. Again, the a6000 is the same size and it has a real hand grip on the right. The X100V is just a pain if you are shooting for long periods without a strap. And last but not least: the manual focus is clearly an afterthought on X100V. Too small, STM focus ring. You can't do serious MF work on this camera... But i know that there's a certain audience for this camera and and only a few choices out there. The Leica Q (out of the question for most people), the Hasseblads (too) and the Ricoh GRIII(x). Between them the X100V seem like the most decent choice.
Hello, could you tell me how the Sony is better? I have one, but I want to get rid of it for an x100 series.
@@lacesoutconor Yes. For my shooting style, Sony has better AF (faster and more reliable), better dynamic range on RAW and way bigger lens market, especially for quality zoom lenses. Fuji cameras are only good for JPEG shooting and they have (marginally) better prime lenses. All the rest (build quality, handling and accessories) are subjective.
@@forneverarrow thanks very much. I own an a6000 and an x100t is being delivered today.
So what are your thoughts on the x100t so far?
Yes.. but doesn’t have to be the V. T also rocks.
With the hype yes justifiable to upgrade my x100t nope and I bought mine 3 years ago as trade for a lense and 200 bucks
Yup the other x100 cameras are still great!
Owned the X100V twice, sold it twice. I couldn’t live with the flat looking images a 23mm f2 produces on a crop sensor.
Sony RX1, for me, had exactly what you were looking for. Not as fun to shoot though - but the images from the 35/2 were amazing
@@Lonnie.G yeah, my boss had one for a while. Weird ergos but that Zeiss lens was awesome.
@@FotosyMas. yea the ergonomics were terrible. I had to accessorize mine heavily to make it usable but I will likely grab another at some point. Used at around $600 it’s almost worth it just for the lens. Wish the second version was cheaper though
At the end of the day there are other ways to add depth…if you want an 85mm look on a 35mm you’re in the wrong place lol
@@Schoolofshots1 I don’t want a 85mm look, I want a 35mm f2 look. The Fuji is a 23mm. It will never look like a 35mm even if the field of view is the same.
The V is def a good camera, but not special. (yes, I owned one)
That’s fair. Overall I don’t think there are many on the market that pull everything together the same way. Just curious, are there any cameras that you do consider special?
The hype is thanks to UA-camrs and tiktokers who can't stop making videos about its hype. 😂
Bingo! They give the people what they want I suppose 😂
@@Lonnie.G lol dude that comment was for you.
And mine was for all of you. Cause here you are lol
Canon G7X mark iii !!
I can’t think of a more overhyped camera than the X100V. I sold mine. It’s a prime example of UA-camr hype. It’s a decent camera, but nowhere close to the hype, and certainly not worth the money.
I tend to agree. A great camera to me, but I wouldn’t personally pay retail for it - let alone the prices it goes for right now.
Stop the bullshit hype, the Fujifilm X100 have been great cameras for years. Who cares about the hype, they go back to taking pictures with their phones. This camera is a fantastic camera, ND, shutter, real dials, perfect combo with TCL and WCL. I'm only waiting the next with 40M pixels and hope Ibis for bad light, at F2 sometimes is difficult.
Agreed - still a special camera 12 years later. The next version of it is going to be insane though. Fujifilm technology is progresssing well now
Overhype fixed lens camera. Cheaper and capable cameras comes in Olympus em10+M.Zuiko 17mm f1.8 or Panasonic GX85+Lumix 20mm f1.7
A lot of great options out there
the short answer is "no". There are hundreds of cameras and lenses infinitely cheaper than this camera that deliver equivalent results. "No" is the answer
Tip: with your zen-like presentation, you just don’t need background music. It’s distracting and actually, quite annoying.
Thanks. No music on my latest video. Though there is some mic feedback from moving around - I’m learning. Let me know what you think on that video.
@@Lonnie.G Hi Lonnie, I must say, I don't watch many YT videos. This was an excellent one. Super well written! (I assume it was written?) Anyway, I also thought the music was a well chosen accompaniment to your voice. I haven't watched any of your other videos, but I will.
I also have a question: If not one of these, then what? I have a Sony a6000 that I don't like or use very much. I prefer my film camera. I am new to this.
No thanks...