Formal Rules to test the validity of Categorical Syllogisms

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 65

  • @tameshewolf
    @tameshewolf 5 днів тому

    Love that you contextualize the theoretical rules with history! Thank you!

  • @ivleenkour2649
    @ivleenkour2649 2 роки тому +3

    I truly believe most useful video on you tube to understand these fallacies

  • @jochellejoycemagboo1540
    @jochellejoycemagboo1540 3 роки тому +5

    Learned more in your 22 min lecture than I did reading my modules for 2 weeks.

  • @armeenjan4934
    @armeenjan4934 3 роки тому +3

    Thank u so much sir. Now i have overcome my confusion in these rules. You taught it in an easy way.

  • @ayeshajabeenkhan5396
    @ayeshajabeenkhan5396 2 роки тому +2

    Thank you sir😍😍 you have cleared all my doubts about these rules... mindblowing lecture. May Allah bless you

  • @hedimariyappan2394
    @hedimariyappan2394 2 роки тому +1

    Good class sir. Thank you sir

  • @wopil_jin
    @wopil_jin 2 роки тому +1

    I finally understand the rules. Thank you, Sir.

  • @curlyhair380
    @curlyhair380 3 роки тому +1

    Sir your explanation is superb and easy to understand

  • @kritikarimal1870
    @kritikarimal1870 Рік тому +1

    very insightful

  • @kiranlakhlan7810
    @kiranlakhlan7810 2 роки тому +1

    Thanku so much sir it is very helpful video for me to clear all my doubts 😊😊

  • @mathmate9855
    @mathmate9855 2 роки тому +2

    What is the difference between formal and informal proof, Sir?

    • @SumantaSarathiSharma
      @SumantaSarathiSharma  2 роки тому +1

      It may not be categorized as formal and informal rather formal and diagrammatic proof.

  • @CalvinKalisto
    @CalvinKalisto 2 роки тому +1

    This was very helpful, thank you.

  • @SumitKumar-vi2zj
    @SumitKumar-vi2zj 2 роки тому +1

    Very helpful sir

  • @gaveshkspolia6896
    @gaveshkspolia6896 4 роки тому +3

    Sir ,There can be more than one violation of rules in an argument, but if the argument comes valid by checking just 1 or 2 rules ..Then is it necessary to check for other rules to test the validity?

    • @SumantaSarathiSharma
      @SumantaSarathiSharma  4 роки тому +1

      For validity, all the rules have to be checked. For invalidity, one is enough. However, you must check all so that a complete list of rules violated are known.

    • @gaveshkspolia6896
      @gaveshkspolia6896 4 роки тому +1

      @@SumantaSarathiSharma satisfied..ok sr

  • @gyandeepdutta7485
    @gyandeepdutta7485 3 роки тому +2

    Sir how can u know that a term is distributed...?

  • @advjaytisharma8980
    @advjaytisharma8980 2 роки тому +1

    Thankyou so much sir...

  • @saqlainhyder7892
    @saqlainhyder7892 3 роки тому +3

    Some apples that can be eaten are green fruits because no mangoes are apples that can be eaten and no green fruits are mangoes major premise.?
    minor premise?
    conlcusion?
    major term?
    minor term?
    syllogism in correct form?
    Which rules are broken for the categorical syllogism completed in ? What are the
    corresponding fallacies,?
    Is the syllogism valid through rules?

    • @saqlainhyder7892
      @saqlainhyder7892 3 роки тому +2

      sir please solve this ill be thank full to you

    • @saqlainhyder7892
      @saqlainhyder7892 3 роки тому +1

      please solve this

    • @saqlainhyder7892
      @saqlainhyder7892 3 роки тому +1

      REPLY PLZ

    • @saqlainhyder7892
      @saqlainhyder7892 3 роки тому +1

      REPLY PLZ

    • @SumantaSarathiSharma
      @SumantaSarathiSharma  3 роки тому

      No green fruits are mangoes - Major premise
      No mangoes are apples that can be eaten - Minor premise
      Some apples that can be eaten are green fruits - Conclusion
      Invalid syllogism
      Exclusive premises fallacy.

  • @Syllogist
    @Syllogist 2 роки тому

    But what about this approach?
    1) Расчёт силлогизмов модусов ААА, AAI (All-All…) /РАЗГАДКА «Бермyдских треугoльников» ЛОГИКИ - 1 / Сalculation of syllogisms of modes AAA, AAI (All-All...) / SOLVING THE "Bermuda Triangles" OF LOGIC - 1 ua-cam.com/video/NMDlodgZYfc/v-deo.html
    2) 09-02. Расчёт силлогизмов модусов АIх, AOx, IAx, OAx… / РАЗГАДКА «Бермyдских треугoльников» ЛОГИКИ-2 / Calculation of syllogisms of modes АIх, AOx, IAx, OAx... / SOLVING THE "Bermuda Triangles" OF LOGIC-2: ua-cam.com/video/9-aWMfCIgk4/v-deo.html
    3) 09-03. Расчёт силлогизмов модусов AEE, EАE, EAO, EEE… / РАЗГАДКА «Бермyдских треугoльников» ЛОГИКИ-3
    / Calculation of syllogisms of modes AEE, EАE, EAO, EEE...
    / SOLVING THE "Bermuda Triangles" OF LOGIC-3: ua-cam.com/video/E0-41sQwqjY/v-deo.html

  • @ashishgautam6236
    @ashishgautam6236 3 роки тому +2

    Sir I have my exam in 2 days and I have some doubts, is there any way that I can reach you?

  • @elorapal921
    @elorapal921 2 роки тому

    Thank you sir .

  • @luisaobregon6855
    @luisaobregon6855 Рік тому +1

    maybe give us real examples cuz im having a hard time with just letters to understand it :>