'Do You Want Me?' Ep. 6 Clip | Outlander | Season 3
Вставка
- Опубліковано 26 жов 2017
- Claire and Jamie feel as if they know each other less than when they first met, warped by time, but does it matter?
Watch Outlander now on the STARZ app: starz.tv/WatchSTARZYT
Subscribe now for more Outlander clips: bit.ly/1kalhP0
Like Outlander on Facebook:starz.tv/OutlanderFacebookYT
Follow Outlander on Twitter: bit.ly/OutlanderTwitterYT
Follow Outlander on Instagram: starz.tv/OutlanderInstagramYT
Season 3 of Outlander picks up with Jamie and Claire, separated by continents and centuries, as they attempt to make a life apart from one another, each haunted by the memory of their lost love.
Outlander is internationally distributed by Sony Pictures Television.
Like STARZ on Facebook: starz.tv/STARZFacebookYT
Follow STARZ on Twitter: starz.tv/STARZTwitterYT
Follow STARZ on Instagram: starz.tv/STARZInstagramYT
Outlander | Season 3, Episode 6 Clip: Do You Want Me? | STARZ
bit.ly/2ly2x3b - Розваги
I love how slowly they move towards each other.
Ive felt that before...
It almost hurts to remember... No, it does hurt still...
lord that man- 'do you want me' ? hell YES lol
This SLOW BURN is so ridiculously good. I LOVE how showrunners made this play out. & Sam & Caitriona are UNMATCHED as a tv couple. Their chemistry is electric & their raw vulnerability plays so beautifully on the screen!!! ❤️😍
I was very disappointed how they changed Jamies reaction with the reunion. When he said it is very nice to see you again Claire I was crushed. They wrote it that way to create tension and keep us hooked on the show. Nothing like the book. One of my favorite scenes I’ve ever read in any book is when Jamie could hardly hold the pictures bc his hands were shaking and he fell into her arms like a tall tree sobbing. I was so looking forward to watching that and they cut it. I still don’t think they really get why were so hooked on Outlander. The relationship! Not silly, childish behavior. In the book, Jamie asked Claire if she wanted him for the man he was now bc he was insecure about who he had become and terrified she’d leave once she found out his secret. It was a beautiful scene in the book.
What was Jamie's secret? I havent seen this whole.episode yet
@Jessica S DITTO!!!!!!!
Mobius Strip thank you for writing this! I have never read the books but I was still a little disappointed he didn't cry or tremble which is what I excepted him to do! I'm happy to know that Diana wrote him this way! Now we can picture how it really went! 😍
And fans of the book like you need to realize the writer of the show will always have a different vision things will not be the same get over it or dont watch the show
Mobius Strip The script writers think they know better than Diana Gabaldon… Consistently very disappointing.
Quit being polite dammit! "Do you want me?" "I want you so much that I will burn to ashes if you don't start getting out of those clothes this minute!"
Finally realized why he kept pressing her about wanting him. when they got married she did swear her vows knowing she would leave the first chance she got., until she fell in love with him. When she told him the whole truth, thats when he knew about her trying to flee, and he loved her enough to let her go. So he took her to the stones, but by then she didn't want to go. So he just wanted to know that she really wanted him this time.
... I quit !!! GEORDIE AND HIS IMPECABLE TIMING 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Its on the other kissing scene. In this scene the door knock was for dinner.
Barb Walker that is my favorite part. I giggle every time. “Gods tooth, it’s not even noon”. Haha
A. Malcolm . . . one of my favorite episodes!
I think Clarie was suffering those twenty years as much as Jamie or even more.She never stop
Looking for Jamie. Her love for Frank was not anymore. Jamie was her love for the rest of her life.
I think so too, she stayed in a loveless relationship for the sole reason of raising her child, she couldn't be intimate with Frank unless she closed her eyes and thought of Jamie. Me personally I couldn't get past the fact he looked like Black Jack Randall.
@@barbieg821 that's the main reason I dislike Frank. I just see black jack
@@rahatamin1873 do you even watch the show or you just troll to spew your bullshit???? Thanks but NO THANKS to Your advice!!!!
@@barbieg821 yes i did.... But I'm speaking generally about the western society where adultery /cheating excuse is a common thing..... And why do you need advice when you have grown up /used to see with it...
Do yoh think adultery and excuse cheating common in your society by one night... It's your media and Govt who make this kind of show so that you get used to it and finally when It's happen your life you have nothing to say unless this(It's normal)
I love how seductive Clair is.
She slowly steps closer and closer to Jamie.
I think I'll take a lesson from that!
2 brilliant actors
Kikitab, Thanks very much for the reply. Sometimes when I read the book or watch the show I miss things as Im multi tasking at the same time, not glued to the tv. So you helped a lot. Thanks again.
DAMN JAMIE GET IT SHE REAL YOUR SOUL MATE IS HERE LOVE THIS SCENE
In answer to M Carpenter"s observation that Jaime "went & lived in a cave"---Well he didn't have much choice if he wanted to stay out of the clutches on the British army.
They definitely knew each other more at this reunion more than when they were wed. When they were wed he knew nothing about her but her maiden name, that she was a healer by that day’s standards, that she was a prisoner who wanted to go home, and lies about who she was, where she was from, and how she got there. She knew that his first name was Jamie, Colum and Dougal were uncles on his mother’s side, that he was flogged by Jack Randall, had a price on his head, was living as an outlaw for a crime he didn’t commit, and was good with horses. They knew what kind of person the other one was through their conversations, which connected them, but that’s it. At this point 20 years later having already been married for nearly 3 years, they know what love is, they have been intimate, he knows she is a time traveler from the future, which is huge, they have 2 living children and one whose death they were able to grieve together, and they have lived through the politics of Paris and full blown war together. He was on the run, raped, tortured, suicidal, lead covert missions and an army into battle, and killed his uncle. She was assaulted, kidnapped, held prisoner, tried as a witch, had a dangerous pregnancy, poisoned, forced to kill men, taken hostage, had full blown PTSD episodes, and nearly raped on several occasions. And, both were forced to leave their children for their own safety thinking they would never see them again, and had to part with their true love as if the other were dead and live as a miserable shell of themselves in a life they never wanted. That’s not taking into account all that she learned about his life over those 20 missing years from her research to find him. I think he forgot how little truth he actually knew about her while they lived at Leoch, huge experiences can make you forget what life was like before them.
Essa cena foi uma das mais emocionantes da série ,a volta dela
See the problem is they are not making it clear here why Jamie is acting weird and even seems a bit angry at her. In fact there is a scene they shot but cut out or shortened they after this one in which Jamie finally blows up and confronts Claire with his belief that she has fallen in love with Frank while she was gone. The only reason Jamie asks her if she wants *him* here and asking *why* she came back is because he is jealous and thinks of all the years Claire had been happy with Frank, believing him dead and not even looking for him. Earlier on in this episode, after they spoke of Jamie's son, he asks Claire about Frank and if she was happy with him - the dark cloud hanging over Jamie's head in S3 is Frank.
Sam does a good job in this scene. He doesn't overact as he does sometimes.
My favorite episode!
Thanks Olive. I appreciate your response.
My goodness I wish I could have been there at that table read for this scene
I dont understand why ppl are giving thumbs down!
Wig department needs to level up!
Julie Sanchez: In the interview you saw with Sam, what episodes were you talking about ( paralized by Claire). Was it the first 5 episodes of season 3? Haven't watched them yet. I did watch the reunion though, to see what it was all about. My opinion, less is more, if you know what I mean. One of my favorite scenes , the expression on his face when she ask him if he wanted her to go, and the other one when he ask her if she had been happy with Frank. If he only knew.
cont: I am with you about the Photos of Brianna and Willie.Liked the book version better though. His reaction to Briannas pictures, I read a heading in one of the chapters of the books that will explain it, I think ( THE DEEPEST FEELING ALWAYS SHOWS ITSELF IN SILENCE ). It does make akind of sense.
I heard Sam fought for the way it was played...he said Jamie would never come apart externally but rather only on his insides. I think DG said this.
I love the Reunion episode 🤩💖🥰
i d k y but seeing all these comments make me remember the show again and i just fall in love with the pair all over again.
Alguien puede darme la canción del final del capítulo Je Suis Pret, por favor!!
0:07 so this is where Bridgerton stole the phrase from?
Bridgerton also stole “bolt the door” 😂
I NOTICED THAT TOO!
I'm dead😂 Bridgerton just made it more intense
@@kennemedia01 Nah...
🤣🤣
I'm on Jamie's side. Maybe he was so shocked that she wad really there. The other times he only imagine her. As for his daughter and son. He knew his son whereas he had never met his daughter so there isn't that connection.
HE WILL MEET HER VERY SOON
rhonda thompson THAT’S RIGHT!!!! AAAYYYYYYEEEE
I totally agree with you!! I really like your answers every time in every video of outlander!!! Stay safe and be happy!!
Amaria se tivesse Legendas! !
Also, he said they knew less about each other than they did when they were Wed. As much as they loved each other, does he think for one minute that she would forget anything about him, even after 20 years. She also kept up with a lot of historical items about what went on back then. Thats how they found him. What did he ever do to try to find her after he lived through the battle? Went and lived ina cave for years. After that he decided he was so lonely he got married again. Can you imagine what Claire went thru raising Brianna, not being able to mention Jamies name out loud and seeing his daughter as a reminder. I think she could have raised her by herself. She was a strong lady.She just never had a chance to grieve for Jamie whenshe went back thru the stones as she was so mad at him for making her go but later no, except when she was alone.She was lonely for 20 years as well but she didnt go out and get married again even after Frank died.
First, they knew each other. They were both fairly young adults then -- particularly Jamie. At the time they separated he was like 26??? At 46 he for damn sure isn't the same person that he was (obviously, since one of the first things he did is completely omit the wedding to Laoghaire -- and our Jamie wasn't a liar). And until she went to Scotland with Brianna, Claire seemed against knowing anything that happened at all. She assumed he was dead. Only when Frank is dead and her daughter is grown did she bother to do any research on anything. If she had, she might've known Jamie was alive much, much sooner. But the point is, 20 years can and does change a person. Neither of them are the people they were. At the reunion, they're both wondering if who they are will fit with these people they basically put on pedestals two decades ago. No pressure lol.
Second, I'm unclear on what you expected Jamie to do. I mean, she was 200 years in the future. It's not like he could go through the stones himself or send an e-mail. Sorry. That was flippant. But apart from leaving messages in a bottle, once Claire was gone, she was gone for him. It was Claire that had the power to go back, not Jamie who could do anything about it.
Third, I think they both made mistakes. And they both suffered. He was broken and lived in a cave, had an illegitimate son, and then married Laoghaire for the chance to be a father -- something denied him the minute he sent his wife and child to safety. But I can understand his insecurity. I mean, Jamie, when confronted with Claire's return, is clearly aware that he is not the young man he was when they first met. And he sent her through the stones to a husband who loved her. A husband she loved. And she's back, sure. But only after Frank has died. And since it doesn't seem like Claire filled Jamie in on any details about their sham marriage, how is he supposed to know that the marriage was a sham?
The reunion is flawed regardless on rewatch. Lots of unanswered questions. I love the awkwardness of the encounter, but it lacks a bit of intensity. And a scene where they're totally explicit about catching each other up. I mean, let Jamie lie about his new marriage. Yay drama. But there are things they don't seem to know about each other, and that's messed up. Indeed, one of the downsides of the season -- and this episode in particular -- is that we didn't get a scene detailing the last 20 years of their lives?? The audience mostly knows thanks to the first 5 episodes of season 3. But whatever Jamie and Claire know about each other is circumspect at best. We needed a scene that was more direct than what we got in this episode with "filling in the details" in voiceover. Jamie seems to have confessed to prison, an illegitimate son, and smuggling. Claire talks about Bree and being a surgeon. That seems to be it. And it's obviously not enough. And because neither seems intimately familiar with how painful the last 20 years have been for each of them, the reunion lacks an intensity I think it needs.
Mary Carpenter Wow girl you are keeping track..I am a new Outlander fanatic, I'm so glad I'm not the only one..Lol
Shavana Baker, I get your meaning. As eagerly as I waited for their print shop return, it seemed a bit "off" on viewing since it was such a tortuous departure for both of them when they parted at the stones. That Jamie asked why she returned was peculiar at best. How could he not know? A bit of shyness and the quick gloss over of reminiscence as they dined was acceptable for me, but I still wondered until the torrid bed scene arrived, bringing to fruition their deep-seated longing for each other.. Good to know we were on the same page.
Well he didn’t tried to find her because he couldn’t, he can’t go through the stones like she did and go back through time. So he had to live and survive.
@@SummerDaina o
Beautiful 😍
Happy Birthday to Sam Heughan today 2021
Se quieren mucho
who cried
Encore une scène qui m a fait pleurer 😂LOFE ❤❤❤❤
There it is. Why we love them as a couple. (I haven’t read the book.)
Does anybody else think that one of the downsides of the season is that we didn't get a scene detailing the last 20 years of their lives?? The audience mostly knows thanks to the first 5 episodes of season 3. But whatever Jamie and Claire know about each other is circumspect at best.
Like Jamie is clearly insecure, and I mostly understand. He didn't just send Claire back through the stones to raise their daughter. He sent her back to her first husband. A man she loved. Enough that she begged for Jack Randall's monstrous life. But Jamie never seems to have an inkling, the whole season, of what a sham that whole marriage was. Not unlike him and Laoghaire. And what does Claire know about anything? He was in prison, sure. She knows the dates of things. But like after this when they wind up in Jamaica, she seems fuzzy on the details of him and Lord John. He lied about Laoghaire.
I really, really believe we needed a scene that was more direct than what we got in this episode with "filling in the details" in voiceover. Jamie seems to have confessed to prison, an illegitimate son, and smuggling. Claire talks about Bree and being a surgeon. That seems to be it. And it's obviously not enough. And because neither seems intimately familiar with how painful the last 20 years have been for each of them, the reunion lacks an intensity I think it needs.
Thisnwas common in the books also. I think partly because Claire did not want Jamie to know how miserable she was all those years. That although she raised a daughter and became a surgeon had “a life” it was a false life. She basically buried who she was and and lived as a shell for 20 years because she left her true self in the past. That was a evident in how much she loved Bree and was a good mother but couldn’t connect. Jamie and Claire need each other to be a whole and each protects that with their lives - Jamie more physically and Claire more emotionally and logically. My take is Claire wants for Jamie to feel that Claire moved forward and lived happily despite the separation then for him to carry the burden that she was miserable for 20 years. Jamie could handle that better - Claire was gone but safe and happy. It would tear at him if he knew she had been miserable. At least that’s my take on it
Shavana Baker Definitely agree here. I’m a little disappointed that neither the book nor the series didn’t take a minute and have Claire fill Jaime in on how miserable and lonely she was as well. She obviously wanted to know if he’d fallen in love with anyone after she left so it would stand to reason that she would think he might want to know how she fared. He eventually gave her the whole story with Leoghiore (sp?). Would’ve been a good time for her to reciprocate. Can’t think of a reason she wouldn’t want Jaime to know the marriage to Frank was only for the purpose of raising Brianna. Shame, that would’ve been a great scene.
There is a deleted/extended scene where she states that she wasn’t happy with Frank as her husband, that their marriage didn’t work, she slept alone for most of their marriage, she didn’t come back sooner because she didn’t know he survived not because she didn’t love him anymore, and that once she knew he had survived she left everything and everyone behind to be with him. It definitely seemed to put his mind slightly at ease that his fears that she had moved on with Frank was false and although he might not admit it he seemed to be glad that she was suffering those 20 years without him just as much as he was suffering without her. Obviously he wouldn’t want her to be in pain, but the fact she never forgot him or replaced him put his mind at ease. They also said in a voice over that while they were eating dinner they filled in the gaps of the last 20 years apart.
What could Jaime have done to locate Claire, M Carpenter ? We know through the books that the whole marriage was engineered by his sister. I don't blame him for getting married. After all, Claire was married to Frank for most of the 20 years they were apart. I think you're being too hard on Jaime.
Also, it’s fucked up that people are mad he sent her back to her time. Like, what, you want her to get raped and murdered by the British for essentially being the wife of a traitor? A pregnant woman? F off. Seriously. People need to realize he did the right thing.
@@nemofish3504 Sending her away was the right decision but damn, they could have been smarter about it. Like, if you live through Culloden, leave historical records to let me know in the future that you're alive. And maybe not 20 years later?
Yes, because that’s exactly something he could’ve done while he was a fugitive and being hunted and having to hide. ???
@@nemofish3504 Well, he managed to evade authorities in the end by working under a different name and it got back to Claire. Not saying it's easy but it might have given them both something to hold on to until they were reunited. As soon as Claire found out where he was, she went back for him. So it wouldn't be impossible for them to have made some sort of plan.
They were trying to stop the battle at Culloden right up until the end....so they were not focused on "making a plan" Given the history of the battle and the fall out afterwards...it is normal to assume that he would not have survived...20 years lost yes....but she was also told by the lady at the house they were staying at... to not chase ghosts....she was not really the historian....Frank was....she was dealing with a pregnancy...broken heart....the time travel she experienced....
Quien molestaaaaaa
Yes yes damnit
I’m curious, why do you think Jamie hesitated before he said “no I don’t want you to go”? That kinda bothers me. In the book when she asked “do you want me to go” he immediately said “NO” Why do you think the writers of the series made Jamie hesitate?
I think maybe because Jamie was shocked she even asked the question. His love for her has never been a question like hers has been for him. He fell in love with her first, and so, again, I don't think he felt like there was ever a doubt on his part. However, Claire was always hell-bent on returning to her husband and I think Jamie has moments where he doubts her love for him because of it.
I felt he was still in shock from seeing her & dealing with the enormity of all that entails... Is she there for a visit? For a quickie? To be his wife? Plus, the guilt of his marriage to "She who shall not be named"...😉 i wanted to scream when i found out!! 😣
I totally agree with Kathy above. That hesitation really bothered me. Too bad the writers didn’t stick more closely to the book. I wanted MORE emotion altho I loved the intensity of their expressions as they undressed-- clever repeat of 1.7
Do you want me?
No, I just traveled 200 years in the past where women can’t own anything, being smart must mean that you’re a witch and where I’m under constant threat of rape on daily basis just for the hell of it!
Seriously, I do not not know why this is popular 🤦🏽♀️
This makes me wanna rip the head off of the person knocking on the door!! Lol!! Intense indeed!!
🥰🥰🥰
Jemi ha paura di perderla nuovamente!
Thanks Julie for the comments. I'm new to the outlanders series. Question? What was the blackmail that made him sleep with that Geneva person?
So Jamie was working in a manor in England, a post he got being recommended by Lord John Grey, the Chief of the prison Jamie was in after he gave himself up after hiding in the aftermath of Culloden. They became friends during his stay in the prison and John sent Jamie to work in England so he could help his family back in Scotland and stay out of trouble... he had a fake name but then Geneva (the daughter of the manor's owner, some English gentleman) discovered he was in fact Red Jamie and told him his father and mother hated him and all the jacobites because their son had died in battle, so she threatened him with telling this story to his parents, send him back to prison for treason and endangering his family back in Lallybroch... so he went to bed with her before she married some old guy and she got pregnant... i can't remember their names and sorry if it's a bit confusing, I hope you get it a bit?
Well, Lord John Grey arranged for Jamie to work as a servant at the Dunsany family. There he worked for some years. He was warned that Lady Dunsany was not particularily a fan of the Jacobites, she had lost her son in the war of Culloden who fought for the British. If they knew he was Red Jamie, the main guy, they would have him persecuted for sure. Thus he lived with them under an alias, Alaxander Mckenzie.
The oldest girl, Geneva Dunsany, was about to be married to an old man. She didn't want to give up her virginity to someone like that. She found Jamie to be really handsome, thus she tried to seduce him. When that didn't work, she found out about his true name and figured out a way to blackmail him. Helpless, Jamie obliged.
why do people keep interrupting? First Geordie and now the dinner. And I can't understand why they don't just continue right after? LOL/
Eu já disse: fez sua escolha de vida ... não tente resgatar o que não existe mais ....
Hot damn!
💕💕💕💕💕💕👍👍👍👍👍
🙂🙂👍
He was hiding some pretty big secrets. I can’t believe she stayed with him after it all came out.
They were apart for 20 years mate.
For many that's an entire lifetime. You can't expect anyone to "Wait" 20 years without the occasional slip up.
P.S. If you're gonna judge Jaime and not Claire then you're a hypocrite.
@@The_Daily_Tomato Yet only one married the woman who tried to have her killed so she could dance on her ashes 👍
@@jeffsanchez2086 And he told Claire why he did it and she understood him perfectly.
Meanwhile she lived a happy life for a time with someone else in a better world.
@@The_Daily_Tomato She tried to have his first wife killed and in the series he knew it. Nobody who actually ever loved someone would do that. But you can worship him, nobody is stopping you 🤷♀️
@@jeffsanchez2086 In the books he doesn't know what Laoghaire did.
Why was she so worried about his liv ing arrangement
He seemed over it. Sam underplayed this imo. They both should have been crying and touching and marveling that this was even possible. She’s the only one to shed a tear and it’s was only one. Then speaking of his son seconds after seeing the daughter he claimed to have grieves. The entire episode was off imo. . Then the whole time knowing he was married to the woman who tried to have her killed. The love story sort of jumped the shark with that rewrite from the book and his graphic sex scene with Geneva while Claire got her hands and a double bed. It’s just not the same for me anymore unfortunately. I don’t believe he loves her the way she loves him so it’s ruined it for me.
You have to remember that men and women are different. For that matter, not every man shows emotion the same. Just because they weren't being overly outwardly expressive doesn't mean that they didn't have deep feelings. Also, Geneva was a conniving witch who blackmailed Jamie into sleeping with her. When she got pregnant, he married her because that was the honorable thing to do. You're being too hard on Jamie.
Miss Priss firstly Jamie never married Geneva as she died in childbirth. He just rode her like a porn star (and in the book basically raped her). So the extortion excuse didn’t fly in either the series nor the book. Secondly, no men and women aren’t different. When you claim to love someone and something as miraculous as this happens you show some emotion. That is why DG wrote it the way she did. Jamie married Leghair. You know the one that he KNEW had her beaten and almost killed? Again the reason DG wrote it as Jamie NOT knowing was because she knew doing something like that would be unforgivable. So no, I’m not being hard on Jamie. He did these things, all on his own.
I cannot believe we read the same book :( is that how you translated the Jamie/Geneva part of the book?
Reed Is3ulaSamoa I read it. In the book he raped her. When a teenage girls struggles beneath you as she screams stop as you cover her mouth to stifle her screams and you yell no and penetrate her that’s rape period in any culture, country, century. Anyway, Ron cleaned it up for the show and made it a smoking hot sex scene. Jamie and a teenager, a hot sex scene. 🤢. The extortion BS was a joke. Claire and the king is what sex to save a life looks like
PREACH
Não gostei do capitulo 7.no final .ele esconde que casou com outra pessoa. Ela não merece m😡😡😡😡😡😢😢😢😢😢😦😦😦😦😦😜😜😜😜😜
How could she know he burned for her for 20 yrs, he sent her away. Also whats with the " Do you want ME bit" Why the insecurity? Who else would she come 2. centuries to find? Another thing, that remark he made, Did you come back to be my wife again or to bring me news about my Daughter" DUMB" Like she just had to go down town.
Mary Carpenter his reaction was rather stilted, I thought. Caitriona Balfe seemed more sincere.
Olive McIntosh Agree. Sam played it too low key. I watched an interview with him where he said that Claire’s absence paralyzed Jamie and we saw that in every episode EXCEPT this one. So for me the Reunion was a let down. And don’t even get me started on how he looked at his daughter for 5 seconds only to speak of his damn ONS son. 😢. Bad bad writing.
Coming back doesn't mean you want someone. Sometimes people come back to see you just to clear their mind and soul. But not because they want another relationship again. He is insecure cause he lost her for 20 years. Can't blame the man for having so many negative thoughts lol
AirFire18 he knows how much she loved him. He forced her to leave he also knows that. He also knew that her returning meant he she left her child. So I agree it was a dumb thing for him to say.
Stupid episode. He had other women and children. Do you want me? Umm yes she came back to pick flowers Jamie. He’s an exhausting character for sure
Do bears shit in the woods
Бедный Джейми. Утратил веру в женщин. Одна шантажировала, другая не хотела делить с ним постель, не хотела родить для него. Конечно, он не знает, какие у Клэр причины для возвращения, ведь прошло очень много времени.
😆
a
You can tell a man wrote this...no small talk...same scene as the wedding night..they undressed each other , same as before...nothing new or words of love after 20 years....was in no way romantic..
..
It’s based on a book series written by a WOMAN
Julie Sanchez: In the interview you saw with Sam, what episodes were you talking about ( paralized by Claire). Was it the first 5 episodes of season 3? Haven't watched them yet. I did watch the reunion though, to see what it was all about. My opinion, less is more, if you know what I mean. One of my favorite scenes , the expression on his face when she ask him if he wanted her to go, and the other one when he ask her if she had been happy with Frank. If he only knew.