Thanks First person means Writer is talking about Richman and her colleagues who had described this theory first time . But in reality there were many studies available in market before Rochman s theory with his colleagues. That's why it's contradicting
@@ielts-9314 but there was no actual time frame regarding this issue, Rochman and his colleagues described the problem and there were many studies about it also. but no real time frame that suggests rochman and his people were not the very first Really confusing. Will be helpful if you can make it clear
Thanks Yes q 32-- harm means Indirectly , scientist is talking about Mussels didn't harm or stressed out with the consumption of plastic debris . Some times ,they are talking in paraphrasing and saying the words in different manner. U need to understand the PSG deeply . And u can't within 1 minute ,then please leave that QUESTION. This is my advice to you.
thanks for not liking my voice . but for exam and results ,you need to bear teachers irritating voice .and you know that type of students also irritate the teachers .
Your channel have no value for understanding the actual answers. In 27 nb question you Did not mention the answer where the key words and why it was false.
27 should be Not Given and 28 False. The reasons you give for your answers doesn't make sense to me, pls I need more clarification Ma.
Mam but,1 answer should be Not Given..because first people are not mentioned in the passage. So, information is missing.
It says plenty of studies...
Thanks
First person means
Writer is talking about Richman and her colleagues who had described this theory first time .
But in reality there were many studies available in market before Rochman s theory with his colleagues.
That's why it's contradicting
@@ielts-9314 but there was no actual time frame regarding this issue, Rochman and his colleagues described the problem and there were many studies about it also. but no real time frame that suggests rochman and his people were not the very first Really confusing. Will be helpful if you can make it clear
Nice mam..I have learnt an awful a lot from your videos.Thank you mam.♥️Mam,could you please solve reading 16 academy.pls mam
Chaumstudies has reading passages from Cambridge 16
Awful?😅
Awful ??😁😂
This passage is too critical rather than it's over another test,,such as 15 ,16,17.
Madam, you are in India or Canada.
Question 32 didn't understand please make it easier and clear don't complicated when you explain the answer.
28th one is not explained clearly
How 32 question is true maim plz make it clear they were expecting for harm whereas in passge there is given no stress out
Thanks
Yes
q 32-- harm means
Indirectly , scientist is talking about
Mussels didn't harm or stressed out with the consumption of plastic debris .
Some times ,they are talking in paraphrasing and saying the words in different manner.
U need to understand the PSG deeply .
And u can't within 1 minute ,then please leave that QUESTION.
This is my advice to you.
Her voice is irritating
But teacher technic is 🤩
thanks for not liking my voice .
but for exam and results ,you need to bear teachers irritating voice .and you know that type of students also irritate the teachers .
@@ielts-9314 no take it as compliment if there will be distance between your voice and microphone then there will be less disturbance in audio
Excellent
mam which pencil is good for IELTS
Thanks
Any HB pencil ✏️ available in market
And if you ask eraser
Then - good quality eraser will work.
Video is good, explanation also but some pronounciation are wrong.
Thanks
Yes I agree
30 number solution is not clear 😢
Thankyou ma'am 🥰
Your channel have no value for understanding the actual answers. In 27 nb question you Did not mention the answer where the key words and why it was false.
Q says - whether Rochman.... were the first persons or not?
Ans is something dif.- plenty of studies have already done before Rochman & colleagues.
Q says - whether Rochman.... were the first persons or not?
Ans is something dif.- plenty of studies have already done before Rochman & colleagues.
That's why it is false
Thanks a million
❤
😫😫
WHY?
your explain skill is poor
If you can't take positive from any thing, this is ur mistake
Stay positive