Technically it is not a light....that is to say, it is not emitting light. It is plasma, which is the fourth state of matter (gas, liquid, solid, plasma). It appears to be emitting light because the infrared of the cameras reflects off of the matter. If the cameras were capturing in broad spectrum it would not have picked it up and we would not see it as recorded. This is why the room area is shut down for the cameras and in as much darkness as we can muster when we leave. Since all matter has mass, the plasma cloud (for lack of a better description) has mass also. The ten million dollar question is how much mass does plasma have? Even NASA does not know the answer to that, only to proclaim that it has less mass than gas. They refer to it only as "dark matter." A few of my cohorts with physics degrees are attempting to crack the equation. They have to leave me out..all I do is make captures, the world of physics is well above my head. Good to talk with you again and thanks for sharing the video. Someone else may have like captures and come forward with them.
So glad to see you back my friend. I aways enjoy your videos. Your videos remind me of what me and my wife do. We get a room and I set cameras and investigate the hotel or location we stay at. I'm sharing out.
Not to burst your bubble, as I'm an avid believer of the paranormal myself - BUT . . . that appears to be a projection reflection of two people walking down the street. I'm a 'sensitive' currently staying at the St. Michael for a few days and I can honestly attest there is something here . but from what I'm gathering is that when a car is parked in a certain way outside it can reflect an image on the wall. - BUT I am not discounting ghosts in this hotel. In fact and so far, I think I have one following me down 'the Row'.
No bubble burst here. We rely on equipment captures, not feelings so you are not hurting the feelings of our equipment, as with equipment, it is either there or it is not. We spent some time considering that perhaps the image could be a reflection from somewhere outside and discounted it due to: 1)the only curtain slightly open that light could have come through was the small space near the A/C unit that could not be shut because of that unit running. 2); Although the ambient light through that opening did project on the wall (and camera) of the capture, the reflection alone was near the door in an alcove, and therefore that image could not have been projected onto that wall from that reflection. 3.)If the camera alone captured the image from the outside (thus imprinting the surveillance directly, as you claim) then it would have also captured all subsequent reflections of the same type from like sources. If you are truly at St. Michael then you know that the sidewalk below our second-story window looked down on the Whisky Row sidewalk...the main sidewalk that is continually jammed with pedestrians except when the "don't cross" warning stops them or at night when the shops and bars are closed. In the short course of the time frames we presented for evidence, there would have been dozens of folks walking that sidewalk and even more vehicles traveling the street next to it at a faster clip. Only that one image was captured during the clip time presented and to say that it was a unique capture due to a particular car and persons that you yourself cannot identify is at the very least "a reach". In fact during the entire two-day hunt morning/afternoon/ evening; curtains closed or wide open; we captured no other images that could have been considered as reflections or other pollution from somewhere outside. We hold that the capture is valid.
@@StanJanParanormal I apologize if I offended. That was far from my intent. I'm a total truther about the paranormal stuff. It exists. I like your channel. If you're in the southwest like me - I got stories about hotbeds like Hotel Monte Vista and The Stanley and the Hotel San Carlos.
@@7n154 No...we don't get offended by negative comments to our videos; it does, in fact, produce more viewership to the video. However, we find it necessary to stand behind and defend our captures so that viewers can read both sides of an argument and decide accordingly. We have been doing these videos for sixteen years now, and while we have probably seventy or eighty videos posted (I haven't counted lately), we have well over two hundred on file. Some we share only with other investigators who are cross-referencing, but mostly it was because, in the beginning, we didn't really catch anything that would have convinced us of a paranormal environment. We only posted videos where we thought we had made a capture just like the television shows do. Down the line, we began to realize that this is a false narrative as it makes it appear that everywhere we went we had a haunting (of sorts). Truthfully most alleged haunted sites produce no activity and that is something that the public needs to be aware of also. In the beginning, we did use some self-professed psychics and mediums who gave us insights on deaths on the properties and then when we researched the properties found their information was at best inaccurate and at most a fabrication. Of course, that doesn't mean to imply that all are phonies, but the few times we used them and got stuck made us realize that a skeptical public wants facts that can be verified and the equipment does that to the best of our ability. Yes we have videos on two of the places you mentioned and have done hunts at all three. The San Carlos (no posting) was one our first haunts and we had some exceptional and goofy occurrences. The goofiest was when we stood in the lobby of third floor and smelled flower scent. My wife claimed it was the flower displays in the lobby, but I showed her that they are artificial. Then my wife's cell phone rang and as we were newly married I asked her who was calling her and she looked and said that I was. My cell was on my belt loop and locked, but I looked at the screen and my cell had called her cell without me touching it. While we were questioning how that happened my wife said "hey, notice that the flower scent is gone?" It did an end run right past us. Anyway, happy hunting, wherever you find yourself.
Glad you’re still doing this. Good video.
Very interesting and great capture on the light on the wall.
Technically it is not a light....that is to say, it is not emitting light. It is plasma, which is the fourth state of matter (gas, liquid, solid, plasma). It appears to be emitting light because the infrared of the cameras reflects off of the matter. If the cameras were capturing in broad spectrum it would not have picked it up and we would not see it as recorded. This is why the room area is shut down for the cameras and in as much darkness as we can muster when we leave. Since all matter has mass, the plasma cloud (for lack of a better description) has mass also. The ten million dollar question is how much mass does plasma have? Even NASA does not know the answer to that, only to proclaim that it has less mass than gas. They refer to it only as "dark matter." A few of my cohorts with physics degrees are attempting to crack the equation. They have to leave me out..all I do is make captures, the world of physics is well above my head. Good to talk with you again and thanks for sharing the video. Someone else may have like captures and come forward with them.
So glad to see you back my friend. I aways enjoy your videos. Your videos remind me of what me and my wife do. We get a room and I set cameras and investigate the hotel or location we stay at. I'm sharing out.
Great video!!!! Your research of the history is always very interesting. Great anomaly find! Thanks for sharing and glad you are back.
Not to burst your bubble, as I'm an avid believer of the paranormal myself - BUT . . . that appears to be a projection reflection of two people walking down the street. I'm a 'sensitive' currently staying at the St. Michael for a few days and I can honestly attest there is something here
. but from what I'm gathering is that when a car is parked in a certain way outside it can reflect an image on the wall. - BUT I am not discounting ghosts in this hotel. In fact and so far, I think I have one following me down 'the Row'.
No bubble burst here. We rely on equipment captures, not feelings so you are not hurting the feelings of our equipment, as with equipment, it is either there or it is not.
We spent some time considering that perhaps the image could be a reflection from somewhere outside and discounted it due to: 1)the only curtain slightly open that light could have come through was the small space near the A/C unit that could not be shut because of that unit running. 2); Although the ambient light through that opening did project on the wall (and camera) of the capture, the reflection alone was near the door in an alcove, and therefore that image could not have been projected onto that wall from that reflection. 3.)If the camera alone captured the image from the outside (thus imprinting the surveillance directly, as you claim) then it would have also captured all subsequent reflections of the same type from like sources.
If you are truly at St. Michael then you know that the sidewalk below our second-story window looked down on the Whisky Row sidewalk...the main sidewalk that is continually jammed with pedestrians except when the "don't cross" warning stops them or at night when the shops and bars are closed. In the short course of the time frames we presented for evidence, there would have been dozens of folks walking that sidewalk and even more vehicles traveling the street next to it at a faster clip. Only that one image was captured during the clip time presented and to say that it was a unique capture due to a particular car and persons that you yourself cannot identify is at the very least "a reach". In fact during the entire two-day hunt morning/afternoon/ evening; curtains closed or wide open; we captured no other images that could have been considered as reflections or other pollution from somewhere outside. We hold that the capture is valid.
@@StanJanParanormal I apologize if I offended. That was far from my intent. I'm a total truther about the paranormal stuff. It exists. I like your channel. If you're in the southwest like me - I got stories about hotbeds like Hotel Monte Vista and The Stanley and the Hotel San Carlos.
@@7n154 No...we don't get offended by negative comments to our videos; it does, in fact, produce more viewership to the video. However, we find it necessary to stand behind and defend our captures so that viewers can read both sides of an argument and decide accordingly. We have been doing these videos for sixteen years now, and while we have probably seventy or eighty videos posted (I haven't counted lately), we have well over two hundred on file. Some we share only with other investigators who are cross-referencing, but mostly it was because, in the beginning, we didn't really catch anything that would have convinced us of a paranormal environment. We only posted videos where we thought we had made a capture just like the television shows do. Down the line, we began to realize that this is a false narrative as it makes it appear that everywhere we went we had a haunting (of sorts). Truthfully most alleged haunted sites produce no activity and that is something that the public needs to be aware of also. In the beginning, we did use some self-professed psychics and mediums who gave us insights on deaths on the properties and then when we researched the properties found their information was at best inaccurate and at most a fabrication. Of course, that doesn't mean to imply that all are phonies, but the few times we used them and got stuck made us realize that a skeptical public wants facts that can be verified and the equipment does that to the best of our ability.
Yes we have videos on two of the places you mentioned and have done hunts at all three. The San Carlos (no posting) was one our first haunts and we had some exceptional and goofy occurrences. The goofiest was when we stood in the lobby of third floor and smelled flower scent. My wife claimed it was the flower displays in the lobby, but I showed her that they are artificial. Then my wife's cell phone rang and as we were newly married I asked her who was calling her and she looked and said that I was. My cell was on my belt loop and locked, but I looked at the screen and my cell had called her cell without me touching it. While we were questioning how that happened my wife said "hey, notice that the flower scent is gone?"
It did an end run right past us. Anyway, happy hunting, wherever you find yourself.