RIP, Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 сер 2024
- Expect everything to go to hell.
-----
Join the community discord! ► / discord
Watch Us LIVE (And Click Dat Sub Button!) ► / gameboomers
GB Archive Channel ► / gameboomer
Dev Kit Channel ► / @thedevkit
SFO Backups Channel ► / channel
BitChute ► www.bitchute.c...
Rumble ► rumble.com/c/c...
Brighteon ► www.brighteon....
DailyMotion ► www.dailymotio...
Odysee ► odysee.com/@Sh...
-----
SUPPORT THE SHOW:
BTC:bc1q6udqgvfm9uaj59l24ut7f73wvsfu707kk6pn3m
SubscribeStar! ► www.subscribes...
Streamlabs! ► streamlabs.com...
Patreon! ► / shortfatotaku
Paypal! ► paypal.me/short...
Humble Bundle Affiliate Link! ► www.humblebund...
Amazon CAN Affiliate Link! ► amzn.to/322aFAa
Amazon USA Affiliate Link! ► amzn.to/30PLxgN
Amazon CAN Wishlist! ► www.amazon.ca/...
Amazon USA Wishlist! ► www.amazon.com...
-----
SFO-CIAL MEDIA! HYUK HYUK
DA TWEETS ► / sfosecretary
DA FACES ► / sfotaku
DA GABS ► www.gab.com/sh...
DA MINDS ► www.minds.com/...
DA PARLERS ► parler.com/pro...
DA STEAMS ► steamcommunity....
-----
Credits:
Thumbnail ► ShortFatOtaku
Background ► / cryomancerlex
Music ► • Video
-----
#RBG #RuthBaderGinsburg #SCOTUS
You support gender equality, pro choice, and gay marriage? Cringe.
yes
The Constitution applies to everyone. Not just those you agree with.
Caring about things is cringe.
@@TheLemonbrown >Being a degenerate
>Not cringe
KeK
@@ShortFatOtaku Hope she sees this bro... Oh wait, she can't, she's burning in hell! 🖕😂🖕
Judges should not be activists, left or right. Rest in peace.
Azraiel213 Agreed, a judge should be fair and impartial. And really, this kind of talk should really be happening in a few days, not while the corpse is still warm.
Qwerty Bastard Politics has become too polarised to do anyone any good. It isn’t a debate over how we can best help people any more, it’s a debate over how extremists can hurt each other.
Still, when the extremists inevitably kill each other off, there’s people like us who can rebuild society. They sure won’t.
It's weird that people get mad when someone with public trust like a Police Officer is corrupt and disrespects their office and its duties, but when it's their teams Supreme Court Justice it's totally fine?
Symmetrical Docking It’s ideology based on emotion, nothing makes sense.
Qwerty Bastard Keep your head down, don’t go to protests and riots and maybe invest in fortifying your home. Also, keep offline mediums of entertainment, books, box sets of good tv shows and that kind of thing. Also get some scientific studies and scientific books. Culture and science are often destroyed by extremists whose rhetoric is proven wrong by said science or mocked by said culture.
“Routinely anti-second amendment” while surrounded her entire adult life by protectors with guns. What a hypocrite
The Traveller You expect a democrat to pay attention to subordinates and employees? They’re too self-important for that. Many republicans are too. Power will make a snob out of most people.
@@joshuapowell6822 those with power need to make an effort to remember those around them and those who do usually deserve their power while those who don't do not deserve it
firearms only for ruling elite and praetorians, not for the plebians who'd actually need them to defend themselves.
guns for me but not for thee? no chance .
There's nothing ironic about that, it's abolition would just mean a government monopoly on guns, and would permit guns only to those with a direct need (think security guards, gang-busters, Etc.), it's not hypocritical at all.
It's not like guns don't exist outside of those United States, Mexico, and Guatemala (the only countries with constitutional rights to bear arms).
Trump should just give the same speech Obama did.
Just play the video clip of Obama for them, their brain will pop. Lol
Yeah, no, Obama had an entire year, Trump has a couple months. Besides, if McConnnell blocked Obama's Supreme Court nominee for an entire year for completely political reasons, why shouldn't the Democrats do the exact same thing? Or is it only alright when Republicans do it?
@@AtariDad You're conflating two different situations. McConnell blocked Obama's nomination when Republicans controlled the Senate. Democrats removed filibusters on judicial nominations when they had the Senate. Republicans warned that they would use this when the tables were turned. That time is now.
Obama did not nominate a judge in 2016, it was blocked by Republicans and in 2017 (under Trump) Neil Gorsuch was appointed. So yeah, Biden is not wrong but because of Democrats changing the rules, they have no case to complain.
@@vandecasa3795 so was it wrong for them to stop Obama and if so why isn't it still wrong?
Seems like everyone playing the "well it happened to obama" game didn't want Republicans to do it to the dems yet their position flopped now that it's trump?
Is it wrong or right to block the selection? Who is doing it should not matter.
what does "gay-rights", "immigrant rights", "women's rights" even mean? Don't they already have rights that everybody else have??!
Gay-privileges, immigrant privileges, women's privileges. That's where the Left is insidious, their destruction of language straight out of 1984.
Hey, everybody's equal. Some are just more equal than others. Or so they believe.
They don't want equality, they already have that, they want MORE.
in leftists language, the words you hear them say sound the same, but the definitions are all fucked.
@@trevinschaerr3732 and we buy right into their game rules
Not supposed to say RIP, that shows a Christian bias that conflicts with her Jewish heritage. She is a shade in the underworld of Sheol now, a dark and cold place where the dead remain forever.
"There will be riots."
Well, you've got nothing left to bargain with at this point.
"There will be riots"
And? Dems riot when Starbucks runs out pumpkin spice lattes.
KFC ran outta chicken.
I demand a riot.
@@itbesilly4544 Remember when people rioted because of Popeyes Chicken LOL
Free Trial: I remember that. Friggin’ ridiculous sight.
It's OK, she was just a clump of cells.
Best comment on this matter I've seen yet.
Cruel, but fitting and well-deserved.
Very pragmatic way of looking at things. Neither good nor bad.
An expensive one at that. The fortune that was coursing through her veins for years, only to delay the inevitable.
Apparently so is your brain
"Ruth Bader Ginsburg was America's Dumbledore"
I didn't know she was gay
Of course you didn't, it didn't come out until it was irrelevant.
Shame these fake journalists can’t read anything other than Harry Potter. Also, hasn’t JK Rowling been excommunicated again by the woke cult? Mentioning one of her works mustn’t be good for that journalist.
this is a stupid "meme" but i figured i would share the discomfort with others because in soviet Russia, caring is sharing. ua-cam.com/video/blgvslrfYV8/v-deo.html
Rest in Peace, Gun Grabber.
You spent the last precious years of your life being a political tool.
🎩
🐍 no step on SNEK! 🇺🇸🇭🇰
Isn't this the same woman who wanted all nine seats of scotus to be held by women? Seems she was a feminist to her core, put the women in power and make everything else unequal.
@@DigitalGame18 a filthy partisan. The world is a better place without that unwrapped mummy
@@DigitalGame18 Yes. When I heard this I cringed. We have a mix of genders now because that lack of insight was wrong. For women to try and push it in reverse would be even worse because we should know better.
@@DigitalGame18 It's the same woman that defamed the US constitution and upheld the South African constitution as an example to the world in the same breath. She was unworthy of her position from the beginning.
We step on snek and then take hong Kong.
Can you imagine if it was a conservative justice who had died. Twitter would be celebrating.
You mean when they cheered about Antonin Scalia very suspect passing. Cause I remember
Remember how the twittesphere acted when Trumps big brother passed away.
Sorry while I celebrate by popping open this bottle of gin
She did in death what she could never have done in life.
Made a better future for the U.S.
Not all heroes wear capes
#LiterallyShaking
That Obama clip is still so infuriating. Did he ever accurately represent his opponents point of view?
The question was never about appointing justices during election years, the question was about the Senate (held by the opposing party of the sitting president) appointing a justice during an election year. That is almost never done. It’s basic US history.
Personally I expect that if we replace Ginsburg you're probably going to start seeing a lot more gun rights cases being heard. She's been one of the most anti-2A judges we have ever had. Being a bit of a gun nut I'm pretty happy about that possibly.
One of the takes that's actually aged quite well.
It's like fate itself wants an all-out civil war in America this year...
If that's what fate wants... who am I to reject it?
Big igloo, bois. Big. Igloo.
All of this is pretty fragile
She probably died a while ago and are revealing it now for maximum chaos. She hadn't even been seen officially for a while so it fits.
Ah yes. The conflict between the soyboys that are against the 2nd ammendment versus the gun chads. My money is on the latter
@@MrLolguy93 Oh yeah it would be a very one sided war especially since most police and military lean right or libertarian and the majority of gun owners do as well.
By immigrant rights he means leftie voter rights
You lost me at “she wasn’t evil”
There are evil, subversive, manipulative people out there and she checks a lot of those boxes
I don’t know her history. Care to enlighten me with a few pointers?
@justame smith context and citation please
@justame smith you made the claim, burden of proof is on you.
@justame smith you also have to prove im a socialist when i haven't said any socialistic ideology things.
The Kavanaugh hearings were so awful I hope that Trump gets someone in before the election. Also Dev stop pretending that the Dems are antiwar, they love it.
Remember when they complained Trump pulled out of Syria (or some country in war)?
@@mrshmuga9 We weren't in Syria; they were upset we weren't though.
It sounds like you're okay with judges legislating from the bench.
The gay marriage rulings wither you agree with it or not was judical overreach. That should have been a job for the lawmakers, not activist judges.
Judges are supposed to be impartial, but she clearly wasn't.
I objectively oppose your assessment.
Evil is somewhat subjective, and to me RBG was evil.
Would Dev think that a police officer who was corrupt or unable to do his job and who refused to step down anyways was serving the public?
Now replace police officer with someone with even more public trust and power, a Supreme Court Justice
How?
Agreed brother!
Darth Ginsburg....I wouldn't put it past the democrats to resurrect her with a cybernetic suit.
"there will be riots"
Bruh there already is. All over the country.
Ding Dong the witch is dead.
Which old witch?
@@MA-ox4rw Its a shame she didnt die 87 years ago
@@MA-ox4rw ITS A SHAME A RIGHT WING MILITIA DIDNT KILL THE BITCH
Guess she ran out of her supply of fresh souls
Andrenochrome withdrawal does a number to ya
I just love the irony that RBG called fetuses "just clumps of cells" and was taken out by just a clump of cells (cancer).
It's just show me she was right, they need to be eradicated.
Poetic justice.
Wow man thats like...
so deep.
Wonder which circle of hell she will end up in?
Reference: The Divine Comedy
The Eighth.
@@atpyro7920 just the 8th?
I'm thinking it would be either the 2nd,the 4th,the 6th, the 8th. or even the 9th
You are no better than that which we fight against in the SJWs. Grow some maturity and look deep within yourself to find what about you thinks it's acceptable to wish hell upon someone who simply disagrees with you. Is politics really that important, that you would damn another human to eternal torture simply because they are not on your team?
RBG did nothing immoral, she was simply wrong in her assessment of what is important, but that is only a justification to argue against her positions from a position of good faith, not a justification to hate a fellow American.
Attitudes like yours are what is destroying this country through violent tribalist polarization. People like you are worse than any SJW who is not motivated by hatred.
@@sirzorg5728
I hear the sound of spinning bowties.
@@sirzorg5728 you have earned +10 dark side points. and as for the hell reference which you obviously missed, the majority of humanity makes the trip. But based on your reaction, i applaud your assumptions and hate.
"This is the 11th hour crisis."
Steady on, it ain't even October yet. 2020's not done.
Maintenance Renegade Democrats really do like abusing the elderly and the dead, don’t they?
RGB over, CYMK forever!!!
@@Paakkus_miikunainen doesn't matter, so long as you're not mixing CYM to get K and flood your media
Troll With A Purpose What about YMCK?
@@mrshmuga9 sounds kinda gay tbh
YOUNG MAN
I am waiting on my video to render, but I just finished putting together 8 minutes worth of me explaining why her death is good for America, and it boils down to one simple thing: "the Constitution is a living document." Not the "amendable" kind, but the "subject to loose interpretation" kind. All laws are strictly interpreted for a good reason, but Ginsberg's statement indicates that she thought the Constitution should be subject to a personal subjective interpretation. For laws, that basically means they don't exist, as they become mutable if such is convenient for the agenda. I'll have the video up soon enough, but that's the gist of it. She was basically a traitor against the highest law of the land which she swore to uphold. I do not deny the unfortunate human side of her death, but I celebrate the end of the roots of "the Constitution should mean whatever I can twist it to mean" in the body that is tasked with behaving precisely the opposite of that. Edit: it's up: ua-cam.com/video/vTmejS8mcog/v-deo.html
Notorious RBG passed away. Requiescat In Pace.
Am I hearing Crab Rave somewhere distant?
✨🎇🎆🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🎆🎇✨
All I hear is Ding Dong the Witch is Dead
SFO. I'm glad you had a very balanced take of the situation. But if I may push back "Slightly" on your gay marriage thing as Gay person myself.
I fully support Civil Unions for gay people. I think Civil Unions should be how the government as a whole recognizes "marriage" And I think Marriage should only "exist" to the religious institutions
Basically Straight people and gay people would apply for civil unions, and marriage would be controlled by the Church, thus a very clear boundary of the separation of church and state.
But overall very balanced take my friend. And yeah, I feel the same way about Trump's 3 scoops of Scotus. The Dems changed the rules in 2013... and by golly it bit them in the ass. I only hope if Trump wins 2020 with a super majority in the house and Senate, that he forces them to change the rules back, and implement term limits.
Here’s a question. How does the court (?) determine if two people should be considered a civil union (by virtue of living together so long) versus friends that happen to live together?
@@mrshmuga9 Oh, I think he just means that you'd apply for either a marriage or civil union. The court wouldn't really "determine" anything per se. They would just process your paperwork.
Your proposition here is actually the exact same as the one I've had for a while. It's nice knowing your not the only person with this kind of idea.
@Kvothe Windrunner Honestly yeah. Government should have no involvement in Marriage in my eyes. Marriage should be a religious institution and a religious institution only. Civil unions should be what the state issues for both straight and homosexual couples. If you want to apply for marriage, you apply from the church.
There have been a few times in judicial history where the courts have basically heard a case out of sheer exasperation with the appeals. Abortion was another one, and Roe v. Wade amusingly enough could get a 9-0 decision on whether anyone actually, genuinely wanted to hear it. My understanding of how gay marriage got to SCOTUS was that the states were all bickering about it, acting like little kids, and so the courts treated it like a bunch of bickering little kids and made a hard ruling to clear the case pileup.
Doesn't make it right per se, but the people do need to share some blame for elevating the issue to that point, I'd honestly say the majority of the blame goes to the public.
Don't feel hatred. I don't feel positivity either. All in all it's a situation of "OK., best wishes and rest in peace."
Yeah. I agree. Though, I can't stop from feeling this creeping dread in my heart.
Is it wrong of me to assume none of them even knew who this woman was till the announcement of her death?
I only knew (by name) because of that dumb movie about her starring the girl from Rogue One. Every time the youtube ad came up she would say her name and I find it irritating that it was drilled into my head. Regardless of the type of person she is.
Community Organizers, Rioters and Looters: "Oh thank God! Another excuse!"
3:55 this is the best argument for repealing Roe v wade I've ever heard.
I am now pro life.
Thank you Doctor.
RGB is dead. Now, it is time for CMYK lighting.
I’m pro-choice too but I never realized people questioned it until 20 yrs ago and then I realized I could question it shortly after.
Now I’m semi-convincingly pro choice whereas I was once unquestionably pro-choice.. The second a man realizes he’s having a family the realization of when life starts kicks in. I deeply hope you get to find this out for yourself.
She’ll be voting by mail
RBG in hell like: “wait where’s Hitler, Mussolini and Columbus”
@Alexander Scales Yeah, preferrably in the 10th circle.
She’s in the 8th circle kek
"When the righteous prosper, the city rejoices; when the wicked perish, there are shouts of joy."-Proverbs 11:10
"Over our dead bodies!" Antifa
Chad cop gets uncomfortably close to antifa. "Your terms are acceptable." Whispers Chad cop
Harry Reid made that rule in 2013. Sure did age well, right Reid?
At least she can vote by mail now
> I am not pro gay marriage. Although, gay marriage is not an issue to me.
> I am pro life.
> I am against reinventing our Constitutional rights.
I bet 90% and i'm being generous, didn't know who she was before this was announced
i did
nah, she was pretty well "meme'd" by the left. like how in one of marvel's woke comics there's a university for super powered individuals named after Sotomayor...
She had a moving starting that a Rogue One girl. So I’m sure some at least learned more about her from that.
If we riot for long enough and hard enough we’ll forget why we started them in the first place and we will all be homeless. Isn’t that great?
SFO, the slippery slope of everything regarding sexuality and promiscuity being pushed on children has proven that gay marriage was not right... Allowing it kicked this all off...
For the love of god get a pro 2A guy in I want an M249B
I just want Russian imports back...oh ak-12 I long for you so!
From what I’ve gathered Amy Coney Barrett is very likely to get the nomination.
Notre Dame graduate, Catholic, very pro-2A.
I swear she only lasted as long as she did through the hate pulsing through her veins, if you did an autopsy on her, you'd likely find out her heart stopped beating, and she'd been "technically dead" for at least the last 5 years!
So she's the Lingering Will from Kingdom Hearts 2.
@@grandarkfang_1482 kind of, just instead of a suit of armor, it's a the Supreme Court dress thing, and a series of terrible blazers that were probably fashionable in the 60s!
@Maui Caui have you ever seen twitter? There's no hateful lgbt or #BLM people on there, is there?
Idiot!
Are we sure they destroyed the phylactery?
I chortled. Thank you.
Still no idea how you can call taking a life to be a human right. It blatantly isn't if it is literally done to prevent a life and requires advanced modern medical procedure, just as healthcare cannot be described as being a human right because if you do not have modern medicine then you have no access to it. That's also flatly a state issue and her actions in completely violating the rights of the states is blatant and directly contradicted by the Constitution. The states have *exclusive* control over *health, welfare, and morals* according to the Constitution, all federal infringement upon this beyond enforcement of the Constitution is unconstitutional.
I agree with respecting the woman, but this argument is not one that is defensible in my opinion, even if you think it right it is blatantly against the Constitution and requires a Constitutional amendment. This was unarguably an activist judicial decision. The court is not supposed to write legislation, ever, and certainly not in areas specifically under the right of the states.
RBG: This isnt Florida
McCain *Waving*: Dont worry Ruth its a dry heat
1:15 Hitler, Stalin and Mao all did what they thought it was right....
4:04 If Harry Potter didn't exist, what children's book would Leftists use to describe politics? Captain Underpants? "OMG Trump is literally Professor Poopypants!"
“Oh boy...” cried George.
“Here we go again” said Harold.
RBG wasn't a good for the country.
"Fuck you for dying"
My fucking sides, omg!
"𝕐𝕠𝕦'𝕣𝕖 𝕕𝕖𝕒𝕕 𝕥𝕙𝕒𝕥'𝕤 𝕘𝕠𝕠𝕕 𝔸𝕞𝕖𝕟"
Roe v Wade didn’t vanish overnight. Just took a year lmao
"Over our dead bodies. Literally" - Reza Aslan.
Okay.
Let's oblige him.
I accept those terms.
RBG should have retired when *Obama* had the *Senate.* She was too *greedy* for power, and bet on *Hillary* winning in a *change* election. Her *judgement* was just as bad in the courtroom, as it was outside of it.
God have mercy on her soul, for history will not be kind to her "legacy"
only if we win
IrrieldeCZ: “we” don’t need to win. God has already won.
@@xbigbooshx4643 my advice to you, christians, just stop with this crap, its embarassing
@@IrrieldeCZ And our advice to you is; Repent and believe. You will kneel one day, like all men will.
TransSlav: Don’t care if it’s “cringe.” I’ll speak the truth of His glory whether people think it is “embarrassing.” I know this channel attracts atheists because ShortFatOtaku has already stated he is an atheist. Doesn’t mean I can’t try. 🤷♂️
Watching this while blowing up an Arby’s bathroom
Dev: "I wanted it to happen so it wasn't an abuse of power to do it"
Wonderful Intro Dev
wat
@@ShortFatOtaku "I'm an abortion loving degenerate thank you for forcing it on the country eventhough nothing in the 14th amendment could possibly justify it"
What a great career she had. Remember it's not abuse of power when it's "liberal"
@@ShortFatOtaku i don't know where all of these fans of yours came from. Was your earlier content more socially conservative or something?
@Kvothe Windrunner He has always been a leftist, the fact that he opposed other leftists somehow convinced dumbass conservative rightoids that he was "one of them", his more left points of view are just more noticeable because of the current crisis
@Kvothe Windrunner idk but unless you know something I don't it sounds like you and other fans have been kinds deluded. I've been following him for a long time and hes always been more of a moderate, taking socially liberal but not extreme positions. I was more talking about the stuff i wasn't around for like when he was transitioning his anime content to political content (which he mentioned a bit ago in some video).
In the case of Obama, the Republican senate was basically saying "we won't approve it so why even bother". In this case, the senate and president are the same party, so it is in some ways different.
Also, notice what wording is used, the democrats say the new justice until a *new* president, so Trump being re-elected wouldn't count. lol
3:13 I see 2016 Lacy Green reincarnated. "No one's ever _really_ gone." - Harry S. Plinkett
I understand being pro choice, I just can't condone it. I just feel there is never any reason to end, or prevent, any child's life. If a woman can't, or doesn't want to talk care of her own children, she can give them up for adoption. A human life should not be ended or prevented just because it was conceived in vile circumstances, such as rape or incest. In those cases, punish the guilty parent, not the child.
Abortion should not be allowed in order to prevent physical or mentally disabled offspring. If it's wrong to kill disabled adults, it's wrong to kill disabled babies.
The only time it is acceptable to pre maturity end an unborn life, is when the mother is more likely to die. And even then if there is a small possiblity that both survive, it should be the mother's choice to risk her life or not.
I can respect your opinion while not agreeing with it. I think you have good points. I will try and explain how I arrived at my pro choice view. I am pro- choice in the same way I am generally anti suicide but specifically pro euthanasia. Abortion and suicide both take life, and should only be done in extreme circumstances. Morally, I don't agree with the taking of life, but I think there are cases where I think it's overridden by specific circumstances. I think if we left the government decide too heavily what those are, it will lead to unnecessary suffering. I think we actually have very similar views except you think people will make generally bad decisions and the law should stop them. I don't disagree, yes most are bad at making decisions. But I would rather people be able to make decisions like this and be more free, rather than assume it will be end up in more net evil taking place. People who are truly immoral, or motivated enough, will always find a way regardless of the law, if abortion was illegal. People who are moral will always carry regret and suffering even if they thought having the abortion was right and it was legal.
Pretty cool person, not terribly good for the constitution. Glad she’s getting replaced and the drama is delicious.
The argument for denying Obama has final Supreme Court pick was that he did not have a mandate from the people due to the previous midterms not going majority his party. People try to oversimplify the argument to try and say otherwise.
"If RvW gets overturned I'm not gonna have sex with random dudes anymore"
Evangelical Republicans: yeah uh that's kinda the point.
Ramming in a new justice just sounds dirty doesn’t it
Her work ethic and dedication to her job is unsurpassed by any justice in history.
My condolences and respect
I'm not going to celebrate her death, like some might. But I'll be damned if I mourn or grieve that woman. Good Riddance.
The stage is set, the die is cast.
The only thing left is to see what happens next.
We still got a 7 weeks or so. I'd say this is more 9pm.
"Wasn't an evil person" - sorry, but there's no such thing as not being an evil person and supporting abortion, _especially_ late-term abortion, which is just more transparently evil.
Nathan Is a Weasel
What is evil about abortion?
@@jdsmedley Do I really need to spell this out for you? The moment a sperm penetrates the nucleus of the egg, you have a new human life with the same inalienable rights as any other. Saying this human life is less valuable than others is one of the scummiest things a person can say or delude themselves into thinking. It is the sworn duty of medical practitioners to do everything in their power to protect this life and not take any steps to snuff it out; in fact, the Hippocratic Oath for some seventeen centuries had an _explicit_ line against performing abortions as well as this being _implicit_ in the lines about doing no harm to the patient.
The absolute closest you can get to justifying this is during an ectopic pregnancy; this, specifically, is the one type of situation where the baby implants in the wrong place (wall of the fallopian tube instead of the wall of the uterus) and thus, if left there to grow will kill himself and his mother. Our lazy, abortion-loving society has taught doctors to completely give up on these babies and consider them a lost cause and make absolutely zero effort to see if they could be transplanted to the correct place.
Literally any other excuse for abortion? Evil and selfish. "The father was my brother" or "the father raped me" while tragic, are not at all the baby's fault and you should never kill a child for the sins of his father. "Having a child will hinder my lifestyle, but I made no effort to avoid getting pregnant" not only are contraceptives cheap, abstinence is even cheaper and a lot easier; and even if you somehow absolutely couldn't contain your lustfulness, you have multiple orifices that won't lead to pregnancy if penetrated and numerous objects intentionally manufactured to use as an artificial phallus to fill the one hole that will. And then of course there's the longstanding lie that nobody wants to adopt a girl or that nobody wants to adopt a disabled child; there are long waiting lists for foster parents who want to raise any child they'll be allowed to (and in our current modern day society, women are innately more valued than men and thus if anything people would prefer to adopt a daughter rather than a son).
Eliel Cruz: "If the democrats don't fight, the people are going to have to march on Washington and just shut it down ourselves" I wonder what this guy's thoughts are on Jan 6th.
Reza "Burn everything down!" 10.5k Likes. Seriously?
RBG’s desire to lower the age of sexual consent to 12 made me lose all respect for her. But to be fair, she seemed more mentally competent at 87 than Biden.
She never said that though
www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/5838998002
4:30 stop right there, even tim pool said that there was different circumstances there and explained it quite well (or his guest at timcast irl)
My biggest issue with RBG was she wanted to lower the age of consent to 12.
Anyone who knows a survivor of pedophilia will tell you the damage done by it lasts a lifetime.
Ruth Bader Gonesburg
Very droll sir
3:14 isn't she the entitled "5 dollars a MONTH" streamer?
Hah you’re right. Another thing she feels entitled to, although idk how it’s supposed to affect her.
You know what's funny about something you mentioned in the video. All the things that Sargon was harping on back in 2014 and 15. it was the same things that Rush Limbaugh was saying back in the 90s. All the way up to today.
The whole idea of talking about classical liberalism was something that is the foundation of the conservative movement. Most of Sargons claimed philosopher Heroes are the same ones in the conservative movement.
If you really get down to it. How many of the people that you happen to agree with are really just the Rush Limbaugh lite beer edition??
Overall as far as having a few screws loose. Before you throw stones. Perhaps you should take a look at a lot of your former skeptic friends.
How about some of them that have went full retard for communism.
Just food for thought.
Aside from her complete lack of understanding of 2a, RBG did a great job
What do the expect by demanding she not be replaced? That the Supreme Court Justice seat simply remain empty forever?
"Dude just wait untile what the socialists think of Jewish peole" where have I heard that before?
Wrong, Mitch said when a divided President and Senate in an election year the people should decide with the election which they did and Rep won. This year Sen and President are in agreement.
Asked if the Senate had an obligation to assess Judge Garland’s qualifications, her answer was immediate.
“That’s their job,” she said. “There’s nothing in the Constitution that says the president stops being president in his last year.”
"My most fervent wish is that I will not be replaced until a new president is installed."
She was partisan. She was fond of legislating from the bench. I hope the maggots enjoy their meal...
Ruth “The age of consent should be 12” Ginsburg
Nope. www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/5838998002
You can check multiple sources, that isn't what she said
I’ll bet 100$ that that’s fake news, Robert
Listening to 3:10 after January 6th... uhhh...
Went to see if anyone commented this....
2:10 your terms are acceptable
The jenga tower grows taller and taller.
Happy shes been sent to the Shadow Realm
It is very difficult to be anti murder and pro choice simultaneously. When does "pro choice" become murder? When they can support their own life? When they can walk with their own legs? When they can speak? If the status of any of these conditions makes killing OK then we may as well off anyone in a coma/on life support, but we don't, why? Is it because they have experience where the baby/cell cluster did not? I know everything isn't black and white, but this issue skates so close to the unknown mysteries of life that it's best we don't test it. If we convict people for murdering other intelligent beings then we should convict people for murdering beings who will imminently become intelligent. As for the margins, well, I'm certain we can invent legislation that allows the few women each year who legitimately need abortions to receive them under exception. How it is now is just a contradiction of justice and a slap in the face of logic.
They have all of these forms of contraception (that still allow them to have sex) than anyone could ask for... and yet they still allow themselves to get to a point to where they “need” to be aborted.
Don’t forget, they also think sex-selective abortion is okay along with aborting because the baby might have brain defects. By that logic we should round up everyone with Downs syndrome because apparently it’s better to be dead than how they live.
The senate did not offer consent. The exact term is "and by and with the Advice *and* Consent of the Senate, shall (The president) appoint Judges of the supreme Court", Mr. President. For a law graduate, you are sorely lacking in your reading of the document you swore to uphold.
I have a hard time considering anything that isn't a dangerous job as "Serving your country"
The supreme court isn't serving your country it's a life long high paying job and let's not even get into how politicians aren't serving their country.
Cops? Yes
Firefighters? Yes
Paramedic? Yes
Military? Yes
Judges? Fuck no.
Just figured out that the same person who kept saying fuck you to RBG for not retiring is the same Twitch girl who was angry people weren't donating enough to her stream. It all comes together.
Even if Roe vs Wade were overturned, it wouldn't outlaw abortion. It would merely allow each state to set its own policy. Some states like Utah or Mississippi might decide that they don't want the procedure performed in their state. Some states like Massachusetts or Oregon would likely continue to leave abortion legal within the state. America's government is set up on the principal of federalism and states are probably the appropriate domain for abortion to be debated within.
It's saddening that anyone died, ever, but now that it's done there's work to be doing
Now this is good commentary. Love you, brother.