I'm one of the millions you cite who are sick of this crap. I dream of the day when donald trump is out of the news and his name is off the buildings here in NYC so I can walk around this city in peace.
@@teresas8173 I agree. I am so sad at how SCOTUS has lost its integrity. I am old - when I was young, we were able to respect our court and legal institutions. trump has done a lot to lessen the respect we used to have for our institutions. Horrible man.
It won’t be obviously, or they would have denied it weeks ago, and you can see the fear in Harry’s face. It’s not happening, and this case won’t happen anytime this year. On the bright side, Chutkin gets to go on vacation in August.
I can only imagine that Thomas and maybe even the other conservative justices are stalling while they brainstorm for twisted justification to overturn the lower court of appeals decision.
You have it right, a vote to stay and delay the trials is like them feeding the Bear that will tear and chew at the Court itself and it's independence. We have an election coming and the voting public needs to know if one of the candidates is a criminal before it is too late.
There house is clean, and full of Trumpers, so they won’t be scammed by deranged Jack Smith. Harry is trying to tell you to prepare for a huge disappointment Donna, so be ready to accept it. Have a wonderful evening!
It’s a death sentence for Joe Biden Roxanne, because the Supreme Court will grant Trump his stay, and it will never go to trial, once Trump is elected as President! Pretty awesome huh? Enjoy your dinner tonight and feel better young lady.
@@smrthodanje , you’ve wasted your time here instead of taking your country seriously, if you are an American, and for the first time know a little about Trump. Do I reveal anything to you if I tell you he is not what you think or how he, as a perfect demagogue, has portrayed himself to you? Why not start from 1980’s NY? Have you read any newspapers or books about him written by real investigative journalists who started to write about him even before he said he was running for president in 2016? Ask yourself, why did the media suppress so much about his record of being a fraud ? They still do! Even CNN does.
The SC is no better than Aileen Cannon ...delay, delay, delay, delay while the nation and the world burn. Total lack of credibility, morality probity. I am disgusted.
They’re going to crush all your hopes and dreams, that is true, but their only job is to grant justice. Rushing through a political hit job isn’t Justice Leslie, and you need to brace for impact. Have a great snack and enjoy your afternoon in any respect. You’re quite stunning, so you’re blessed in many ways.
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas just happens to oversee the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals...that just happens to oversee Judge Aileen Cannon...Anyone surprised by the conflicts of interest here ...???
You wonder whether the Supreme Court is more concerned with how they are perceived, than how they might rule. But by trying to avoid any decision, they would end up doing exactly what Trump wants.
It’s all over gang, and Harry is trying to let you down easy. There will be no corrupt trial in DC this year, and Trump will be President next year. So it’s not all bad news!
Uhhhhhhh, they’re going to take up the Stay, crush your delusional fantasy about Jack Smith getting Trump, and then Trump gets elected in November! Hopefully that clears it up for you Mr Dragons!
All of this for what is essentially an absurd proposition: that a president could actually commit whatever crimes he/she wants with no consequences! This needs to be seriously discussed?!
What you two knuckleheads need to understand, so you can look intelligent to a 3rd grader, is the immunity in question refers to the Presidential Records Act, and whether or not a President has the right to retain possession of classified material after leaving office. (As EVERY President has done since George Washington) So, no. Committing crimes without consequences isn't being discussed. (Except at Hunter Bidens' dinner table.)
The arguement is stupid on it's face. I expected the Supremes to decline this asap. Except for maybe Thomas and Alito. They seem to want to take us back to the dark ages.
Not at all! Jack Smith has never been authorized by the senate to act as a special counsel and therefore lacks legal standing to bring charges against ANYONE, especially the former POTUS, in a federal court of law. Under the U.S. constitution, senate approval to act as a special counsel is a requirement. Former A.G. Meese and several constitutional lawyers have sent a letter to that effect which has already been received by the SCOTUS, so don't hold your breath because that could very well be why the SCOTUS is delaying judgement.
@@stickcheck3045 the attorney general has the honor of selecting an independent special.counsel. go read up : 28.c.f.r 600.1. also just cease the misinformation. It's dearly disturbing to us rational folks .
@@Taylaen Then let me inform you further as to the qualifications required to act as special counsel: An individual named as Special Counsel shall be a lawyer with a reputation for integrity and impartial decision making, and with appropriate experience to ensure both that the investigation will be conducted ably, expeditiously and thoroughly, and that investigative and prosecutorial decisions will be supported by an informed understanding of the criminal law and Department of Justice policies. Among his more notable corruption cases, Smith prosecuted the former governor of Virginia, Robert McDonnell, a Republican. Although Smith scored a conviction against McDonnell, the case was later overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court in a unanimous 8-0 decision. The Court observed that “there is no doubt that this case is distasteful; it may be worse than that. But our concern is not with tawdry tales of Ferraris, Rolexes, and ball gowns. It is instead with the broader legal implications of the Government’s boundless interpretation of the federal bribery statute.” (Politico, 6/27/16). The High Court also rebuked Smith and warned that “the uncontrolled power of criminal prosecutors is a threat to our separation of powers.” Chief Justice John Roberts said the government used a "boundless interpretation of the federal bribery statute." One need not go into his record at the international courts because it is just as murky. Once again, Jack Smith has used the boundless interpretation of the Enron case to prosecute in the classified documents case. His poor reputation precedes him and he should not have, on the basis of these facts, been appointed as special counsel....PERIOD!!!
@@stickcheck3045sheer bullshit, the Senate and congress in general can appoint one but the Attorney General also has that authority. Your cracker box law degree is worthless. How would you feel if a Democratic president has absolute immunity? It’s all nonsense, the court will lose whatever credibility it has left not to reject hearing this. The only result would be keeping Trump from being tried before the election. If you can’t do the time don’t do the crime.
LOL, wait until they grant Trump his Stay and prevent this scam trial from going forward. Then you will really have something to complain about! Just brace yourself friend!
They seem to have forgotten that they only operate and are effective when the people trust them. Only roughly 18% have any faith left in them. Whatever they decide now will tell us who they actually serve.
@@marvinmartin4692 we’ll pass along your concern Marvin! In the meantime, DERANGED Jack Smith’s fake case is over, as it should be. It was weak, and 2 of the charges will soon be dismissed by the same Supreme Court, so it’s really for the best.
They gave jack Smith 7 days to respond he did in one day the Supreme Court had 6 days to respond back they said Mondays holiday or not! This case needs to move forward already so much delay.
@@shellymunson1882 Sure, Jack smith is smart alright and he knows the law alright. That being the case then, Jack Smith should also know that according to the laws as set out in the U.S. constitution he required authorization from the U.S. senate in order to act as a special prosecutor. Being that he has not been approved as required by law, Jack Smith now lacks legal standing and therefore does not have the legal authority to charge ANYONE, let alone the former POTUS, in a federal court of law! The letter that former A.G. Meese and several constitutional lawyers sent to the SCOTUS is likely what is delaying their decision. Don't hold your breath, because the SCOTUS has no choice but to follow the constitutional law!
Speaking as an observer from the uk, our justices are NOT politically appointed, speaking as a European no EU counties justices are politically appointed. Why are your republics justices politically appointed? it isn't in your precious constitution, why is it happening?
@@damianmcwilliams2371 yes they have, or obviously it would have been denied Damian. It’s all over… and you knew all along that the Supreme Court wasn’t going to pass on a case of this magnitude, especially when they know it’s a rushed con job by DERANGED Jack Smith. They’re not stupid friend.
I thought Harry told you the Supreme Court would easily reject the immunity case, and it would be going back to Chutkin! Do you think….maybe this Trump deranged grifter might be stringing you fools along? LOL
If Merrick Garland hadn't dragged his feet for so long to prosecute this case, we wouldn't be having all these issues so close to the 2024 election. Justice delayed is justice denied.
When Garland summarily declined to prosecute ALL the former Trump Administrators, I dropped my affiliation with the democrats. A Glaring indicator on how Garland would operate, Sloooooowly. Remove & Investigate Mr. "Without fear or favor". What Bullshit!
Take a look at how long it takes to build a case in a high profile murder. Then look at when garland was put in office. Then consider how long it took to weed out Trump supporters from the doj and assemble a trustworthy team consider the j6 committee wouldn't release any info to the doj until after their final report. Then consider garland contacted and hired smith 6 months before smith was able to wrap up his hague cases and get here. During those 6 months garland kept smith fully informed on these cases, which is why smith was ready to go. Actually, this complex case is moving at legal warp speed on the prosecution side.
He’s not asking for total immunity sir, just for his legal actions as President, which is what happened. He’s saying that he was doing his job as President, and he was, so he does have immunity for that…. Sir.
The rally where he ignited the insurrection was a campaign event so not a duty for StinkyD when he was President. Also, there is nothing in the Constitution that says the President should muck around in state elections let alone try to commit fraud to overturn the election. This is why he was ranked as the worst President ever.
This is SO important and the delay is ridiculous. We have NO Justice System , there is NO reason for cases to string out for years. Low level persons of not too many means get very speedy "justice".
It’s time to amend the Constitution and strip the SC of this “high and mighty power” to adjudicate matters of enormous consequence, when they’re darn good and ready! There should be rigid timelines imposed to resolve issues such as this, on Presidential Immunity arguments, to advise the public in a timely manner. It’s ridiculous how much time this has taken!
Scotus needs to allow the j6 case to go forward. The appeals court did a great job deciding immunity and this case neecs to go forward. Scotus holding onto this case only protects Trump and allows him to be above the law. People are loosing faith in scotus.
Do you even know what you are talking about? You Liberals are so funny! Most Americans are sick and tired of the 7 year long political coup d'etat that the Democrat party has inflicted against Donald Trump. First, they spied on his campaign. Then, there was the phony Steele dossier which turned out to be nothing but lies pushed by the mainstream media. Then there was the phony F.I.S.A. warrant that the FBI purposely made 17 "errors" on. Then there was the phony quid pro quo impeachment trick against Trump after Joe Bribe'em did a quid pro quo to have the prosecutor fired who was investigating Burisma and which Joe admitted to doing on video. Then there was Russia, Russia, Russia...another set of lies pushed by the media. Then there was all the irregularities and questionable occurrences including ballot harvesting and states changing the voting rules to fit their agenda by the Dems in 2020. Of course, the FBI and DOJ tried to claim the Hunter Biden tapes as "Russian disinformation" right up until just after the election before they admitted that they were real. From there we go to Jan.6th where we find Ray Epps on a bullhorn urging what was a reasonably well behaved crowd that they "MUST go INTO the capitol...INTO the capitol!". What occurred then has been pushed by the Dems and the mainstream media to be an "insurrection". Again, the Dems attempted to impeach him on phony charges. How laughable considering that Nancy Pelosi had been offered 10,000 national guard troops by Donald Trump a day or so before Jan.6th for crowd control and she turned it down flat! The result of that decision was a complete loss of crowd control attributable to Nancy Pelosi and no one else! If Jack Smith were an actual senate authorized special counsel, it should be Nancy Pelosi he is charging for Jan.6th, not Donald Trump! Well, none of what they tried to oust him worked, so along came all the court cases that were timed to keep him away from the campaign trail and if possible to get him out of the picture completely by throwing him in jail. Well, that isn't working either, so now it was time to try having him removed from the voting ballots. Of course, if all else fails, there's always assassination, isn't there? After all, the Dems had JFK assassinated for some of the same reasons they want to get rid of Trump!
You’re going to hate it when the Supreme Court breaks your heart next week, so enjoy your delusions about Chutkin “getting” Trump before the election! It’s going to crush your soul, but try to enjoy your summer. Peace!
You’re are actually right, this case isn’t happening, because the Supreme Court will not allow a scam trial in DC to take out Trump before the election. Stop being afraid my friend, and enjoy your life. Trump is going to be President, and you need to be able to accept it gracefully.
My guess is that they know they can't give Trump his immunity but they still want to help him so they just make sure he gets his indefinite delay. Then the trial can't go before the election.
Appreciate the context, Harry. I'm hoping, perhaps in vain, that SCOTUS will come out with a forceful denial of Agent Orange's autocratic arguments that really puts him in his place.
Thank you Harry for bringing this news and breaking it down so I can understand it. We all want this nightmare over with, but I take comfort in knowing that I can count on you to give me the REAL story. Unlike mainstream media.
I think the more time they stay silent is an answer in itself. Delay Delay Delay!! Sound familiar, it sure does to me. I hope I am wrong, and they deny everything, but I am concerned at this point. And the longer the Delay, the more concerned I get.
See what I'm talking about you actually waiting around and hoping that they uphold the decision.Dont worry you will get your wish president Trump will be convicted but then I would say it's going to get real ugly in this country.GO TRUMP
Separation of powers means each branch is a check on the other. Vote Blue not only in the presidential but send a Democratic majority to both Houses of Congress and launch an impeachment investigation against Thomas, for starters.
Apparently the prosecution side, Colorado? didn't give a good legal argument. They didn't even quote the justices back to themselves on their previous rulings!
Thanks Harry; Have been wondering what’s going on. There is little trust and less respect for the majority of that once responsible body. It also clearly demonstrates that lifetime appointments are a terrible idea for this or any other branch of the U.S. government.
This moment in our history depends on the Justices to uphold the Constitution and honor every citizen who served and serves the country. For every family who made sacrifice for the good of the country, for every kid who grows up believing that the United States is the best country in the world, for all of us, they need to rule for the American people. Country before personality.
Harry I’m really interested to know how much independence the individual judges have. Even the liberal judges seem eerily quiet in the face of this national crisis of the high court. Is Roberts shutting them up? Are they being bullied into silence? What gives in your opinion?
Exactly, you’d think their self preservation instinct would kick in. Authoritarian governments have no need for a court system, especially an arm of the courts previously considered supreme!
As a Canadian, it seems like the whole American system is divided along partisan lines. Including your highest Court. Of course, Thomas should recuse himself, but the payoff for Trump is why he has enjoyed his and his wife’s lavish lifestyle. Now, Trump the piper is calling the tune. How will the US ever reform itself???
Harry, takes us through the worst case scenario if the SCOTUS rules in Trumps favor. You used the word bedlam. Just how bad could this play out? Thanks from Vancouver, Canada
Time for the Supreme court to put the immunity issue to bed. They have everything that they need to make a decision. It's the Constitution v. Corruption.
These justices aren't the god-like intellectual giants we're led to believe; some of them cringingly ordinary; but they're smart enough to know how to delay the trial to benefit Trump.
It is Essential that the court dispenses of this immediately- there is no such thing as presidential immunity from criminal prosecution; there never has been, and there never will be… if they cannot deliver that then there is no point in having a Supreme Court we should do away with them immediately, and appoint a new court. As far as I’m concerned, there are no authorities in this country that are not accountable to the people . We are guaranteed a republican form of government by the US Constitution, and if there is any such thing as presidential immunity, that does not constitute a Republic
The time drag over this STUPID, MADE-UP NON-ISSUE that shouldn't ever have been heard in the first place is infuriating. Never seen a clearer example of making a mountain out of a molehill, ever. Your tax dollars at work.
Millions of people all over the world are sick of this crap.
Yes we are ! Its a bad circus...
I'm one of the millions you cite who are sick of this crap. I dream of the day when donald trump is out of the news and his name is off the buildings here in NYC so I can walk around this city in peace.
Yes, truly sick, I legit have anxiety because of the insanity of Trump and MAGA, including SCOTUS who I don’t trust.
@@teresas8173 I agree. I am so sad at how SCOTUS has lost its integrity. I am old - when I was young, we were able to respect our court and legal institutions. trump has done a lot to lessen the respect we used to have for our institutions. Horrible man.
NZ here. Yes, we are, totally 💯😠
This should be sent back to the judge immediately for the good of the country.
It won’t be obviously, or they would have denied it weeks ago, and you can see the fear in Harry’s face. It’s not happening, and this case won’t happen anytime this year. On the bright side, Chutkin gets to go on vacation in August.
Hear hear!
It appears that there are enough judges on the SCOTUS who are willing to act for the good of the country.
💯👍
The SCOTUS doesn't exactly care about we the people. Well, most of them.
Supreme Court needs to clean their own house. They seem to be playing Russian roulette with Justice
Literally
And in this case russian is more than just an expression. We'll see if they need to change it to Kourt.
I can only imagine that Thomas and maybe even the other conservative justices are stalling while they brainstorm for twisted justification to overturn the lower court of appeals decision.
You have it right, a vote to stay and delay the trials is like them feeding the Bear that will tear and chew at the Court itself and it's independence. We have an election coming and the voting public needs to know if one of the candidates is a criminal before it is too late.
There house is clean, and full of Trumpers, so they won’t be scammed by deranged Jack Smith. Harry is trying to tell you to prepare for a huge disappointment Donna, so be ready to accept it. Have a wonderful evening!
A leader who is totally unaccountable and immune is called a dictator
🛑
And that dictator needs no Supreme Court.
Definitely!! 💯
Look at what goes on in China, NK and Russia.
or a King. Oh, how much this small man would like to be called King!
This is ridiculous. It doesn’t need to be stayed. It needs to go forward and the Supreme Court needs to do their job and stand by the Constitution.
They will take it up.
SCOTUS is compromised so anything is possible.
You demand too much of this Supreme Court.
Too much to ask integrity nd honesty? The fault, dear Brutus, is in ourselves not in our stars that they are underlings.@@geraldmartin7703
Please show us the wording of the Constitution that you contend that SCOTUS is not standing by.
Dear Supreme Court Justices,
Please Don't STAY this case.
Justice Chutkin will DO THE CORRECT THING.
And then the results can be appealed if she doesn't! There's a system for this.
Supreme Court Sellouts 🧐
@@acrandal TFG will appeal if he loses, even if Judge Chutkin does the right thing. Because he grifts for the legal fees.
Scotus is another embarrassment brought to us by the conservative movement.
This is a death sentence for our democracy. Do they understand this? Do they care?
It’s a death sentence for Joe Biden Roxanne, because the Supreme Court will grant Trump his stay, and it will never go to trial, once Trump is elected as President! Pretty awesome huh? Enjoy your dinner tonight and feel better young lady.
Seems like a majority of them do understand and don't care at all
All they care about is money and power! Screw the country’
"Our democracy " says the group wanting to jail their political rivals..
@@smrthodanje , you’ve wasted your time here instead of taking your country seriously, if you are an American, and for the first time know a little about Trump. Do I reveal anything to you if I tell you he is not what you think or how he, as a perfect demagogue, has portrayed himself to you? Why not start from 1980’s NY? Have you read any newspapers or books about him written by real investigative journalists who started to write about him even before he said he was running for president in 2016? Ask yourself, why did the media suppress so much about his record of being a fraud ? They still do! Even CNN does.
The SC is no better than Aileen Cannon ...delay, delay, delay, delay while the nation and the world burn. Total lack of credibility, morality probity. I am disgusted.
They’re going to crush all your hopes and dreams, that is true, but their only job is to grant justice. Rushing through a political hit job isn’t Justice Leslie, and you need to brace for impact. Have a great snack and enjoy your afternoon in any respect. You’re quite stunning, so you’re blessed in many ways.
@@Paul-mg8fzshut up!!!
Supreme Court Sellouts
Well stated. Americans have had enough of this garbage.
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas just happens to oversee the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals...that just happens to oversee Judge Aileen Cannon...Anyone surprised by the conflicts of interest here ...???
You wonder whether the Supreme Court is more concerned with how they are perceived, than how they might rule. But by trying to avoid any decision, they would end up doing exactly what Trump wants.
Exactly. That’s the court we are stuck with today.
Well; guess what they will do! Whatever favors trump!
Paybacks, without really paying back...
I don't think it's a matter of perception. It's probably a concern of which group would come after them physically.
Very much like Garland...hesitation is not the answer
Delay tactics for the Great Pumpkin!!!
ROE ROE ROE YOUR VOTE IN ROEVEMBER 2024!!!💙💙💙
It’s all over gang, and Harry is trying to let you down easy. There will be no corrupt trial in DC this year, and Trump will be President next year. So it’s not all bad news!
I don’t understand what is taking them so long. It should be open and shut. No immunity for President.
Two words, Alito and Thomas. Ok 3 words.
@@carmelaguanciale6620Add: Gorsuch & Kavanaugh.
Corruption
Uhhhhhhh, they’re going to take up the Stay, crush your delusional fantasy about Jack Smith getting Trump, and then Trump gets elected in November! Hopefully that clears it up for you Mr Dragons!
@Paul-mg8fz you love the idea of a potus with 91 pending felony charges?
Immunity case needs expedited with Thomas recused on this matter. SCOTUS members need to be indicted on corruption matters immediately.
Request denied…. Sir. Scam trial will not be happening before the election. It’s true.
never happen, the USA is a BANANA REPUBLIC!
They are above the law and have proven it... 100% Laws are for suckers and the poor.
Totally agree! Thomas should recuse himself from the entire case…
Thomas needs to be in jail
All of this for what is essentially an absurd proposition: that a president could actually commit whatever crimes he/she wants with no consequences! This needs to be seriously discussed?!
it is being discussed - by judges who want to be part of the Dictatorship of America
And a former president that's quite crazy. No other president has made these claims, except trump( he does love to be first)
What you two knuckleheads need to understand, so you can look intelligent to a 3rd grader, is the immunity in question refers to the Presidential Records Act, and whether or not a President has the right to retain possession of classified material after leaving office. (As EVERY President has done since George Washington)
So, no. Committing crimes without consequences isn't being discussed.
(Except at Hunter Bidens' dinner table.)
🎯
The arguement is stupid on it's face. I expected the Supremes to decline this asap. Except for maybe Thomas and Alito. They seem to want to take us back to the dark ages.
The fact that this appeal was not immediately rejected is a disgrace.
My thought exactly!
Not at all! Jack Smith has never been authorized by the senate to act as a special counsel and therefore lacks legal standing to bring charges against ANYONE, especially the former POTUS, in a federal court of law. Under the U.S. constitution, senate approval to act as a special counsel is a requirement. Former A.G. Meese and several constitutional lawyers have sent a letter to that effect which has already been received by the SCOTUS, so don't hold your breath because that could very well be why the SCOTUS is delaying judgement.
@@stickcheck3045 the attorney general has the honor of selecting an independent special.counsel. go read up : 28.c.f.r 600.1. also just cease the misinformation. It's dearly disturbing to us rational folks .
@@Taylaen Then let me inform you further as to the qualifications required to act as special counsel:
An individual named as Special Counsel shall be a lawyer with a reputation for integrity and impartial decision making, and with appropriate experience to ensure both that the investigation will be conducted ably, expeditiously and thoroughly, and that investigative and prosecutorial decisions will be supported by an informed understanding of the criminal law and Department of Justice policies.
Among his more notable corruption cases, Smith prosecuted the former governor of Virginia, Robert McDonnell, a Republican. Although Smith scored a conviction against McDonnell, the case was later overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court in a unanimous 8-0 decision. The Court observed that “there is no doubt that this case is distasteful; it may be worse than that. But our concern is not with tawdry tales of Ferraris, Rolexes, and ball gowns. It is instead with the broader legal implications of the Government’s boundless interpretation of the federal bribery statute.” (Politico, 6/27/16). The High Court also rebuked Smith and warned that “the uncontrolled power of criminal prosecutors is a threat to our separation of powers.” Chief Justice John Roberts said the government used a "boundless interpretation of the federal bribery statute."
One need not go into his record at the international courts because it is just as murky. Once again, Jack Smith has used the boundless interpretation of the Enron case to prosecute in the classified documents case. His poor reputation precedes him and he should not have, on the basis of these facts, been appointed as special counsel....PERIOD!!!
@@stickcheck3045sheer bullshit, the Senate and congress in general can appoint one but the Attorney General also has that authority. Your cracker box law degree is worthless. How would you feel if a Democratic president has absolute immunity? It’s all nonsense, the court will lose whatever credibility it has left not to reject hearing this. The only result would be keeping Trump from being tried before the election. If you can’t do the time don’t do the crime.
I no longer place any credence in our Supreme Court whatsoever-none!
LOL, wait until they grant Trump his Stay and prevent this scam trial from going forward. Then you will really have something to complain about! Just brace yourself friend!
They seem to have forgotten that they only operate and are effective when the people trust them. Only roughly 18% have any faith left in them. Whatever they decide now will tell us who they actually serve.
Same here!
Bought and paid for by the federalist society.
@@marvinmartin4692 we’ll pass along your concern Marvin! In the meantime, DERANGED Jack Smith’s fake case is over, as it should be. It was weak, and 2 of the charges will soon be dismissed by the same Supreme Court, so it’s really for the best.
I move to impeach the justices of the Supreme Court starting with the Chief Criminal Roberts!
They gave jack Smith 7 days to respond he did in one day the Supreme Court had 6 days to respond back they said Mondays holiday or not! This case needs to move forward already so much delay.
@@shellymunson1882 Sure, Jack smith is smart alright and he knows the law alright. That being the case then, Jack Smith should also know that according to the laws as set out in the U.S. constitution he required authorization from the U.S. senate in order to act as a special prosecutor. Being that he has not been approved as required by law, Jack Smith now lacks legal standing and therefore does not have the legal authority to charge ANYONE, let alone the former POTUS, in a federal court of law! The letter that former A.G. Meese and several constitutional lawyers sent to the SCOTUS is likely what is delaying their decision. Don't hold your breath, because the SCOTUS has no choice but to follow the constitutional law!
What?! I have lost all faith in the Supreme Court, Trump and MAGA donors have bought them off. Vote Blue 💙🌊 for ethics and term limits for Justices.
Oh no, we should disband the Court if you’re not happy with them. I’ll call them and see what they think! Truuuuuuuump in 2024… Terry.
Speaking as an observer from the uk, our justices are NOT politically appointed, speaking as a European no EU counties justices are politically appointed. Why are your republics justices politically appointed? it isn't in your precious constitution, why is it happening?
They haven't made a decision yet?
@@damianmcwilliams2371 yes they have, or obviously it would have been denied Damian. It’s all over… and you knew all along that the Supreme Court wasn’t going to pass on a case of this magnitude, especially when they know it’s a rushed con job by DERANGED Jack Smith. They’re not stupid friend.
Harry, you are SO clear in your explanations! Thank you!
I thought Harry told you the Supreme Court would easily reject the immunity case, and it would be going back to Chutkin! Do you think….maybe this Trump deranged grifter might be stringing you fools along? LOL
He’s the best!
The SCOTUS needs to get this right and side with Justice for All! Can’t bare to think otherwise!
If Merrick Garland hadn't dragged his feet for so long to prosecute this case, we wouldn't be having all
these issues so close to the 2024 election. Justice delayed is justice denied.
Garland has been a total weakling.
When Garland summarily declined to prosecute ALL the former Trump
Administrators, I dropped my affiliation with the democrats.
A Glaring indicator on how Garland would operate, Sloooooowly.
Remove & Investigate Mr. "Without fear or favor". What Bullshit!
Take a look at how long it takes to build a case in a high profile murder. Then look at when garland was put in office. Then consider how long it took to weed out Trump supporters from the doj and assemble a trustworthy team consider the j6 committee wouldn't release any info to the doj until after their final report. Then consider garland contacted and hired smith 6 months before smith was able to wrap up his hague cases and get here. During those 6 months garland kept smith fully informed on these cases, which is why smith was ready to go. Actually, this complex case is moving at legal warp speed on the prosecution side.
Yes. Frankly, in retrospect, Obama should have proposed someone with more substance--and then fought for him/her!
@@robertmiskey5502
He should have started on January 7th
Three years have gone by and we are still unsure if America has a king. Making real progress, guys.
This issue cannot be ignored any longer.
There is no such thing as total immunity period!!! Total immunity would mean it is a dictatorship!!!
Exactly 🤷🏾♀️
Supreme Court: Hold our beers.
He’s not asking for total immunity sir, just for his legal actions as President, which is what happened. He’s saying that he was doing his job as President, and he was, so he does have immunity for that…. Sir.
The rally where he ignited
the insurrection was a campaign event so not a duty for StinkyD when he was President. Also, there is nothing in the Constitution that says the President should muck around in state elections let alone try to commit fraud to overturn the election. This is why he was ranked as the worst President ever.
Amen
This is SO important and the delay is ridiculous. We have NO Justice System , there is NO reason for cases to string out for years. Low level persons of not too many means get very speedy "justice".
Democracy rests in the hands of those guys; it's not too comforting.
It’s time to amend the Constitution and strip the SC of this “high and mighty power” to adjudicate matters of enormous consequence, when they’re darn good and ready! There should be rigid timelines imposed to resolve issues such as this, on Presidential Immunity arguments, to advise the public in a timely manner. It’s ridiculous how much time this has taken!
This is a no brainer. It should take 30 seconds at most. Immunity is not for criminals. Simpels!!
Well, think of Obama killing that kid. You can't be charged if not impeached.
Alito and Thomas must be trying to pressure Kavanaugh, Roberts, and Comey-Barrett in to hearing the case.
Scotus needs to allow the j6 case to go forward. The appeals court did a great job deciding immunity and this case neecs to go forward. Scotus holding onto this case only protects Trump and allows him to be above the law. People are loosing faith in scotus.
loosing ? there is zero faith in SCOTUS
Do you even know what you are talking about? You Liberals are so funny! Most Americans are sick and tired of the 7 year long political coup d'etat that the Democrat party has inflicted against Donald Trump. First, they spied on his campaign. Then, there was the phony Steele dossier which turned out to be nothing but lies pushed by the mainstream media. Then there was the phony F.I.S.A. warrant that the FBI purposely made 17 "errors" on. Then there was the phony quid pro quo impeachment trick against Trump after Joe Bribe'em did a quid pro quo to have the prosecutor fired who was investigating Burisma and which Joe admitted to doing on video. Then there was Russia, Russia, Russia...another set of lies pushed by the media. Then there was all the irregularities and questionable occurrences including ballot harvesting and states changing the voting rules to fit their agenda by the Dems in 2020. Of course, the FBI and DOJ tried to claim the Hunter Biden tapes as "Russian disinformation" right up until just after the election before they admitted that they were real. From there we go to Jan.6th where we find Ray Epps on a bullhorn urging what was a reasonably well behaved crowd that they "MUST go INTO the capitol...INTO the capitol!". What occurred then has been pushed by the Dems and the mainstream media to be an "insurrection". Again, the Dems attempted to impeach him on phony charges. How laughable considering that Nancy Pelosi had been offered 10,000 national guard troops by Donald Trump a day or so before Jan.6th for crowd control and she turned it down flat! The result of that decision was a complete loss of crowd control attributable to Nancy Pelosi and no one else! If Jack Smith were an actual senate authorized special counsel, it should be Nancy Pelosi he is charging for Jan.6th, not Donald Trump! Well, none of what they tried to oust him worked, so along came all the court cases that were timed to keep him away from the campaign trail and if possible to get him out of the picture completely by throwing him in jail. Well, that isn't working either, so now it was time to try having him removed from the voting ballots. Of course, if all else fails, there's always assassination, isn't there? After all, the Dems had JFK assassinated for some of the same reasons they want to get rid of Trump!
Harry, I know why they call it the Supreme Court. They’re supremely annoying.
Supremely corrupt. The Harlan Crowe investigation is advancing ....and at minimum charges are coming..
Thanks for the update Harry. We’re all waiting on the edge of our seats!😱
Thank you, Harry. It's so disappointing the Court is taking so long.with this.
Afternoon Harry, it's aways good to hear from you. The Supreme Court needs to get moving on this decision, no one is above the law.
Your follow is concise, eloquent, and easy to mentally digest. Thanks, Mr. Litman. Much appreciated.
This feels a lot like them dragging it out, giving the stay, without having to face the repercussions of having done so.
The Pony Express was faster than judge to judge in one building.
You’re going to hate it when the Supreme Court breaks your heart next week, so enjoy your delusions about Chutkin “getting” Trump before the election! It’s going to crush your soul, but try to enjoy your summer. Peace!
Thank you Mr. Litman for your channel and reporting. Vote blue to save our democracy and country.
Thank you Harry!
These are the people with absolute immunity.
Their deliberate delaying proves beyond doubt that they know it.
Everyone is sick of trump and republican MAGAS BS.
100%
Not me, we love Trump, and he’s obviously going to win this Stay from the Supreme Court and go on to be President again! Ain’t life grand…
@Paul-mg8fz no need for a Supreme Court under another tRump admin. They know this.
Vote baby.
NO one is falling for that Russian Thug lol@@Paul-mg8fz
Another nail into the heart of democracy if it’s not sent back to Judge Chutkan !!!!!!
Canada here, fed up disgusted
My fear is they'll stall, i get skittish at this point
You’re are actually right, this case isn’t happening, because the Supreme Court will not allow a scam trial in DC to take out Trump before the election. Stop being afraid my friend, and enjoy your life. Trump is going to be President, and you need to be able to accept it gracefully.
This should have been handled in 2022
Call Harlon Crow. He ownes Thomas, and probably knows the owner of Alito, too.
Thanks for your commentary sir!
"Nine separate law firms." I have never thought about it like that.
The Supreme Court fiddled while the Constitution burned.
Harry, you do a great job of covering this complex issue. Your work is most appreciated!
The privilege of SCOTUS...is overwhelming...taking their time and draggin along
What do they have to do that is more important?
My guess is that they know they can't give Trump his immunity but they still want to help him so they just make sure he gets his indefinite delay. Then the trial can't go before the election.
Sick -os on the SCOTUS
Biden should order Donald Trump's arrest and put in solitary confinement, then maybe they will rule on it 😂
That seems about right.
@@breakmylegs7294 😂 I like the way you think
That is exactly what they are doing. Bought and paid for!
Why isn't this absolute immunity a cut and dry decision?
Why do the pro-democracy people remove their opponent from ballots?
My 3 year old knows.
It is. Losing immunity requires being impeached.
Appreciate the context, Harry. I'm hoping, perhaps in vain, that SCOTUS will come out with a forceful denial of Agent Orange's autocratic arguments that really puts him in his place.
Thank you Harry for bringing this news and breaking it down so I can understand it. We all want this nightmare over with, but I take comfort in knowing that I can count on you to give me the REAL story. Unlike mainstream media.
I think the more time they stay silent is an answer in itself. Delay Delay Delay!! Sound familiar, it sure does to me. I hope I am wrong, and they deny everything, but I am concerned at this point. And the longer the Delay, the more concerned I get.
See what I'm talking about you actually waiting around and hoping that they uphold the decision.Dont worry you will get your wish president Trump will be convicted but then I would say it's going to get real ugly in this country.GO TRUMP
Accountability is overdue
Separation of powers means each branch is a check on the other. Vote Blue not only in the presidential but send a Democratic majority to both Houses of Congress and launch an impeachment investigation against Thomas, for starters.
Harry, thanks for breaking it down how you always do with no nonsense.
I’ll say it all day every day, Why would someone who claims to be innocent need complete immunity ?
The SC really needs an overhaul. They do feel they are Supreme and can tease as long as they want.
Apparently the prosecution side, Colorado? didn't give a good legal argument. They didn't even quote the justices back to themselves on their previous rulings!
Thanks Harry; Have been wondering what’s going on. There is little trust and less respect for the majority of that once responsible body. It also clearly demonstrates that lifetime appointments are a terrible idea for this or any other branch of the U.S. government.
They need time to polish the turd they are going to present.
Appreciate the reporting.
They need to get on the ball.
The Supreme Court needs to do their job according to the Constitution. America is watching them.
Thanks for the update.
This moment in our history depends on the Justices to uphold the Constitution and honor every citizen who served and serves the country. For every family who made sacrifice for the good of the country, for every kid who grows up believing that the United States is the best country in the world, for all of us, they need to rule for the American people. Country before personality.
Hi Harry! Thanks for your breakdown 🎉🎉
Thanks but should I still buy the condo in South America?
Sounds like foot dragging, they know time is of the essence
Why absolute immunity is not being denied immediately is beyond baffling. Officials have immunity for official acts, not for criminal acts.
Harry I’m really interested to know how much independence the individual judges have. Even the liberal judges seem eerily quiet in the face of this national crisis of the high court. Is Roberts shutting them up? Are they being bullied into silence? What gives in your opinion?
Thank you Harry! Always a font of knowledge and wisdom!!😊
If they cover for this guy, the court is dissolved. Common sense states that!
Exactly, you’d think their self preservation instinct would kick in. Authoritarian governments have no need for a court system, especially an arm of the courts previously considered supreme!
Uhhhhhh, that’s not how it works, but I understand your sentiment. This was a weak case anyway, so be glad it’s not happening!
I always feel better when you are so detailed.
As a Canadian, it seems like the whole American system is divided along partisan lines. Including your highest Court. Of course, Thomas should recuse himself, but the payoff for Trump is why he has enjoyed his and his wife’s lavish lifestyle. Now, Trump the piper is calling the tune. How will the US ever reform itself???
Harry, takes us through the worst case scenario if the SCOTUS rules in Trumps favor. You used the word bedlam. Just how bad could this play out? Thanks from Vancouver, Canada
The US have to overthink their Court system.
Thanks for you insight, Mr. Litman!
Time for the Supreme court to put the immunity issue to bed. They have everything that they need to make a decision. It's the Constitution v. Corruption.
Thanks for the update, Harry.
Do you ever notice that Jack Smith never publicly shows irritation? I'd hate to play poker against him.
You ain't lying man...😮😂
Thank you.
there is no such thing as "Absolute Presidential Immunity"
Never has been Never will be
I'm relieved to know we're not overworking our Supreme Court justices 🙄
The Supreme Court was SUPPOSED to be objective not political. Interpret the law that no one is above the law, that INCLUDES Trump!
Thanks Harry! You da BEST 🥰
Kinda makes you wonder how in the hell is any other case more important than this one?
These justices aren't the god-like intellectual giants we're led to believe; some of them cringingly ordinary; but they're smart enough to know how to delay the trial to benefit Trump.
It is Essential that the court dispenses of this immediately- there is no such thing as presidential immunity from criminal prosecution; there never has been, and there never will be… if they cannot deliver that then there is no point in having a Supreme Court we should do away with them immediately, and appoint a new court.
As far as I’m concerned, there are no authorities in this country that are not accountable to the people . We are guaranteed a republican form of government by the US Constitution, and if there is any such thing as presidential immunity, that does not constitute a Republic
Thanks Harry. Great show as always. 💙💙💙💙💙💙
Breaking News: Sidney Powell loses appeal to Supreme Court.
Cowardice!
thankyou for clarifying all of this.....still waiting also.
The time drag over this STUPID, MADE-UP NON-ISSUE that shouldn't ever have been heard in the first place is infuriating. Never seen a clearer example of making a mountain out of a molehill, ever. Your tax dollars at work.
Your right, this whole trump claiming absolute immunity thing is a made up waste of time by him and his lawyers
The idea that crime is not against the law is something no court is going to go for.
What about Jack Smith’s case? Why haven’t those corrupt Justices reviewed that case?