Peace Radicals Episode 52 - Mikhail Svetov - Russian Politician, Political Activist, and Libertarian

Peace Radicals Episode 52 - Mikhail Svetov - Russian Politician, Political Activist, and Libertarian.
Russian politician and public figure, chairman of the civil society movement "Civil Society", political scientist, blogger, one of the main ideologists and popularizers of libertarianism in Russia, organizer major federal rallies on various political and public topics. Svetov hosts his own UA-cam channel entitled "SVTV".
/ svtvofficial
Live and Let Live is the world’s only real peace movement. The Movement is organized around a fundamental principle we call the Live and Let Live Principle. As greater numbers of people truly accept the Live and Let Live Principle, we will necessarily evolve towards a world predominated by both freedom and peace.
The Live and Let Live Principle essentially holds that aggression is wrong. There is simply no way to achieve a free or peaceful world so long as the law permits people, groups, or governments to aggress against others. With aggression outlawed, competent adults would be entitled to both define and peacefully pursue their happiness. Competent adults should be in charge of their own lives, property, money, and time. They have the right to be left alone or to peacefully and fairly contract with other competent adults regarding their property.
A free society requires the proper balance between the rights of one person to do whatever they want with their property with the equally important rights of others not to be disturbed in their affairs by the activities of others. This is the essence of freedom.
People adhering to the Live and Let Live Principle agree that the initiation of force, fraud, or coercion is wrong in all cases. It remains wrong even if the initiation of force, fraud, or coercion is employed to accomplish desirable moral goals. It is not possible to aggress our way to a peaceful society.
It isn’t only the actual initiation of either force, fraud, or coercion that violates the rights of others. The substantial threat of such an initiation also violates another’s rights. It is for this same reason that we recognize a justified act of self-defense even before an actual use of unjustified force. That we don’t always agree on exactly which particular circumstances allow a justified act of self-defense doesn’t mean we fail to recognize the principle that one need not wait until another’s fist hits their face before such person can legally and properly act to prevent the aggression.
Learn More: www.liveandlet...

[@bare_hollowness]

Советов реально глыба на фоне зарубежных либертарианцев

[@MichaelWeizenfeld]

Да как-то не особо. Один слив по вопросу можно ли врываться в чужую недвижимость, если ты не знаешь частная она или государственная, чего стоит. Поэтому он и стал типа прагматиком,

[@magnusequus]

Всегда интересно послушать Михаила на других каналах, особенно на английском

[@lsupastock]

жаль, что youtube рекомендации сработали только спустя два года, интересная дискуссия

[@МихаилСалтыков-Щедрин-ю2е]

Не знаю английского, но уверен Миша накрутил им всем хвоста

[@promouter683]

Международный уровень

[@mic_y]

Thanks for that one, nice to see a bunch of good buddies talking about our dear freedom philosophy! ❤

[@DamienBrittan]

It's been a whole year since Svetov was on your channel . You should bring him back and talk to him again .

[@markmoiseyev3726]

I came up with a joke. If DokaRyan was political and organized second conversation with Mikhail, he would say: "I left russian libertarian out of my sight for a year, and something interesting happend between Russia and Ukraine", or something like this. But it's not a very good joke...

[@markmoiseyev3726]

I think the same, also this podcast was very deep, and in my opinion, maybe even the best of Mikhail's English interviews. Not long ago Mikhail was on Canadian libertarian Tim Moen's channel: ua-cam.com/video/z6UgtQPmckw/v-deo.html

[@shalidor1619]

based

[@kotenkonikita]

Спасибо за видос с световым

[@Vlad-sw4zd]

Да, Михаил тут молодец. Аргументация сильная, дискуссия интересная.

[@Michael_Protestant]

Хрен нашел эту запись...

[@rembo96]

🤘

[@varvarith3090]

Какие же западные "либертарианцы" всё-таки левые.

[@nonameypog]

я надеюсь, не все американские либертарианцы -- такие пусечки

[@purgatorik]

я не понял. Если государственная собственность создана на наворованные деньги граждан, то почему из этого следует, что посягательство на наворованное (собранное со всей страны по сути), не является аморальным? Ты уничтожаешь наворованное у других (пусть даже тебе и принадлежит какой то смешной %, ты посягаешь на НЕсвои 99.9%)

[@rembo96]

Если их нельзя вернуть владельцам, то морально будет хотя бы сделать грабёж менее выгодым способом получения денег. Если ты никак не участвовал в ограблении, но получил часть денег, ты понизил выгоду для грабителя.