My ancestors are from the Kayı tribe of the Oghuz, who migrated starting from 1071 and remained in small villages (Eskisehir) in Central Anatolia until 1950, isolated from the outside world, very small village surrounded my hills&mountains ... My grandfather passed away at the age of 96. They were settled there by the Seljuks during their time, and they never left that place. He told the stories of Central Asia and the times they migrated have been passed down from generation to generation. he told me when i was 10 years old, ''we were nomads and come this land via seljuks, tell our stories to next generation like those before us'' . The entire village is related to each other and resembles Central Asians in terms of appearance...I checked old ottoman registry, my grandpa was right about past and genetic roots. I live in Istanbul right now, people constantly asking ''are you korean/ tatar/uzbek/turkmen'' ? due to my asian eyes :)
@@عليياسر-ذ5ب There doesn't exist a concept like original Turk from biological sense. All haplogroups exist from much earlier times than any known ethnic groups in the world. No genes are patented and licensed to one particular ethnic group. There is no Greek or Turkish or Persian DNA. Turks just like the rest of ethnic groups in the world have very diverse biological ancestries from both maternal and paternal sides since they appeared as a distinct ethnic group in history.
@@Alprtngakrc No, the original Turks look like this man, but you are Iranians, Kurds, Greeks, Romans, Georgians, Armenians, and a small minority that is almost a lender. They are the original Turks.
@@عليياسر-ذ5ب There doesn't exist any original Turks. Even the first time they appeared a disticnt ethnic group they had This is scientifically established fact. Today many of the Iranians are the Turks assimilated by Persian speaking people who originally came from India. Those BMAC people are forcefully assimilated by Aryan invaders coming from India. Those people weren't originally Persian speaking people. Their culture an civilization was completely wiped off by the Indians speaking Vedic language. Linguistically speaking there is no real evidence regarding Indo-European roots of Iranic people. The language of Avesta in Iranic people and the language of Veda in Indian people are very similar to each other and Veda thousands of year older than Avesta.. Most probably what happened was these Indo-Aryan people coming from India conquered the remnants of Sintashta people who didn’t move to east and north after subjugating BMAC people and imposed their language on them. From there this language was imposed on the populations in Europe who had much less crowded populations back then and that’s how Indo-European languages emerged.
... I visited Türkiye last year and I'm fascinated with all I saw, the people, the food, the architecture, the language ( I even started studying Turkish ... it's so difficult though ... ), the geography ... etc ... I can say that I felt safe and welcome ... Istanbul is a jewel ... I want to go again. I had been in Ephesus, Izmir, Kusadasi ... beautiful places and a lot of history ... Greetings from Miami ... !!!
@@albalb6409 ... jealous ... ??? ... are you jealous ... ??? ... of course you are ... !!! ... and you have a reason ... !!! ... Türkiye is awesome ... !!!
😂Costume of the Asiatics : Pants The only people you would see wearing pants were the ‘barbarians,’ and pants didn't get invented until men tamed the HORSE. Sometimes these pantaloons were made of the skins of animals ; at others of rich and fine tissues embroidered or painted in sprigs, spots, stripes, cheques, zig-zags, lozenges, or other ornaments. Sometimes they fit tight, at others they hang loose and fall in large wrinkles over the shoes. The Classical Greek did not even have a word for ‘trousers.’ 'Barbarian' meaning was :non-greek speaking.
Not a single Greek, Latin (Roman), Byzantine, Arab, or Persian author ever claimed that the Scythians spoke Persian (Iranian) language, although many of these writers have stressed the finest details of their everyday life, culture, beliefs, customs, and habits. Especially important is the fact that Herodotus, whose information is routinely used by the Scythologists, was a native of the Asia Minor city of Halicarnassus, in one of the ancient Persian satrapies, he could not fail to distinguish the Persian (Iranian) vernaculars from the others, especially since he visited Persia and not once met Iranians outside of Persia. However, Herodotus never says anywhere that the language of the Scythians was Persian or Persian-like. He writes that the Scythians and Sauromates are related tribes, close in way of life and language, but cites very little information on their language, but even that limited information, as we shall see below, confirms the paradigm about the Türkic-linguality of the Scythians." Scythians, Balkars, and Ossetians K.Laipanov, I.Miziev Origin of the Türkic peoples
@kikap2242 the Greece that you imaging has been died very long time ago.the majority and even I can say almost all of them(Greek people) are gypsy people now.
That is sure that Turkish are very genetically diversified, because I am originally from Trabzon and our ancestors came from Crimea Ukraine. This means that we have mixed with all a lot of people.
i am also one of those from mother side (my mother is from trabzon as well) , on father side all migrated from ottoman bulgaria to sakarya. so yeah when people ask "i basically am from the black sea area" i say :D
Mehmet Oz,MD, is a popular American doctor and television personality. His DNA test showed him to be Ashkenazi Jewish. I think the truth is that Ashkenazi Jews, like myself, have a lot of Turkish blood. In the year 740, a group of Turks converted, the Khazars, became Jewish. Centuries later, they migrated into Poland.
Probably. For example, Ukrainian president Zelenskiy is Jewish. Khazars settled at today's Ukrainian land for 3 centuries. If Zelenskiy walks on the streets here at Turkey nobody will think he is a foreigner. He looks like an ordinary Turkish guy...
The thing with Anatolia is that its local peoples never really went anywhere. From Hittite Empire to Persian, then Greek colonization to Roman times, locals adopted the culture of whomever in charge over time and mixed. Considering that the incoming Turks were in effect a minority since Anatolia has always been a highly populated region due to its capability to support living with farming, fishing, water sources and such, the current DNA composition isn't that surprising. It's kind of like what happened with Britons followed by Romans, then Angles, Saxons and Normans in England.
Anatolia wasn't a highly populated land when Seljuks seized the control there. Its populatian was widely reduced due to plague of Justinian which hit Anatolia multiple times from 541 CE to 750CE and it's thought to wiped off some 75 percent of Anatolian population. Moreover continous wars with Sassanids, Arabs, Seljuks as well as the expeditions of crusaders not to mention the several civil unrests dwindled the population furthermore and forced the bulk of the population to move the coasts on the fringes of Anatolia. Those Anatolian populations and Turks were living in totally different geographical locations except a few cities. Turks were living in the interior parts of Anatolia while the native populations were living coastal cities behind the castles and they had very little interactions with each other. Turks were definitely not a little minority in Anatolia and many of the Turkish tribes escaping from Chingiz Khan's invasion of Central Asia came and settled in Anadolia in the 13th century. According to the European traveler Marco Polo who went to Anatolia in the 13 century Turkmens had already the overall majority in the entire Anatolia as early 13th century. In Marco Polo's map Central Asia was called "Great Turkey" and Anatolia was called "Turcomania" (Turkmens' land).
@@Alprtngakrcnny how the genetics of modern Turks is closer indigenous Anatolians than the conquerors. Which makes them assmilated Greeks, Armenians, Assyrians, Iranians , Balkans
@@matrixxx3662 Yes it's based on genetics. I just can't post the link here because then the post will disappear. But it's definitely based on genetics. It's more than this. It's an established based on all the genetic samples available regarding Turks.
As a Uzbek, when I visit Turkey, I don’t face any difficulties in understanding Turkish people, of course there are some differences in pronunciation but I can get by
Don't worry, Tengri hear all your voices that's why send Tengri Kut for Turk enemies to destroyed all around 4 continent lands was owned by Bilge Kağan. Bilindiği üzere Stalin rejimi Türklük ve Turancılık fikrine ve Türk coğrafyalarının bir çatı altında toplanmasına müsaade etmedi. Bu davaya yakın olan bütün aydınları, dini ve milli liderleri toplu olarak katletti. Bütün katliamlar 1936-1945 yılları arasında farklı zamanlarda değişik Türk cumhuriyetlerinde uyguladı. Bu hadiselerin baş aktörlüğünü Stalin adına NKVD, daha sonra da KGB istihbarat servisleri yaptı. Bunlardan biri de 1993 yılına kadar saklanabilen ve Kırgızistan’ın başşehri Bişkek yakınlarında bulunan “Ata- Beyt” toplu mezarıdır. 138 kişiye ait bu mezarda kurşuna dizilerek öldürülenlerin çoğu Kırgız Türkleri olup; aralarında Uygur, Tatar, Kazar’da vardı. Bunların arasında Türk dünyasının meşhur yazarlarından Cengiz Aytmatov’un babası Törekul’da vardı. Katliam, Bişkek şehrinin yaklaşık 30 km dışında bulunan Ala Dağların eteğindeki bir tuğla ocağında gerçekleştirildi. 1938’deki bu katliamın bir de şahidi vardı. Tuğla ocağı bekçisi Hıdır Aliyev... Aliyev, saklandığı yerden inleyerek can verenlerin çığlıklarını duydu. Ölmeden önce, bugün Issık Gölü’nde yaşayan 80 yaşındaki kızına şunları söyledi: “Kızım! Kireç ocağında çok büyük bir katliam yapıldı. Şimdi bunu kimseye söylemezsin. Zaman ve zemin uygun olunca bunu herkes bilmeli” diye vasiyet etti. Bu hadiseyi, Kırgızistan Cumhuriyeti 1991 yılında tam hürriyetine kavuşuncaya kadar kimse öğrenmedi. Kırgızistan 1991’de Sovyetlerinden ayrılıp hür cumhuriyet kurulunca, katliam hükümete bildirildi. Kırgızistan’ın ilk Cumhurbaşkanı Askar Akayev bu duruma bizzat el koyarak 1993’de kazı başlatılması için gerekli kararı çıkardı.
Seljuks were %35-%40 Asian and were between Uzbeks and Turkmens autosomally. They didn't look like some Han Chinese. All Turkics are Eurasians. A mix of West and East Eurasian. Modern Turks have %7-%22 east Eurasian ancestry. Thus modern TURKS ARE %20-%45 Seljuk. If you don't know anyting about genetics it's not my fault. Also our non Turkic part is not a monolith either. Modern Anatolian Turks have only %35 ANF ancestry. Hittites had %60+. So no we are not same people with ancient Anatolians at all. A simple calculation of Turkish west Between Medieval samples in Vahaduo; Target: Turkish(West) Distance: 0.6720% / 0.00672047 31.2 KAZ_Kipchak 30.2 Anatolia_Center_Phrygian_650BC 16.4 Paleo-Balkan+Slavic_MNE_Doclea_Bjelovine 9.2 Caucasus_BlackSea_Samsun_B_150BC 8.0 IRN_Hasanlu_IA 5.0 Levant_Sidon_1800BC
@@yeterhalatci9705 kurds are not immigrants. they are iranian people who have lived in that area since forever. besides that, the dna of a turk and kurd living in the same area shouldnt be far off. azeris for example have about 80 to 90 percent iranian dna and maybe 5 percent. as we have seen in this video, turks from turkey are maybe 5 percent turkish. the rest is a mixture of greek, italian, iranian and other caucasus people.
My grandfather was from Tuva, Russia. He had light blue eyes. Through Google research, l have found out -just a few months ago-that l am without any doubt Turkic, although l do look Mongolian or Chinese.
my grandfather has iceblue eyes, one of my aunt and my dad is little dark skin like me, biggest aunt is look like russian blonde and blue eyes, my brother look like tatar my sister is cotton white skin with green eyes ,my nephew is blonde and blue eyes, we mixed
The famous Turkish thinker and scholar Hoca Ahmed Yesevi has a saying: Turkishness is destiny, religion is a choice. What I want to say is that Turkish is a race and it contains many different religious beliefs, can you imagine it from the Siberian steppes to Central Asia, from the Balkans to the Danube river, from the Ural mountains to the Finnish steppes? We can give a few examples of this: Gökoğuz (Gagauz) Turks or Sekel Turks living in Moldova or the regions of Romania close to the Hungarian border The Sekel Turks or Cuman Kipchak Turks in Hungary are Christian Orthodox or Christian Catholic. Turks in the Balkans generally adopted the Anatolian Bektashi tradition. Various Hungarian Turcologists stated that Hungarian is of Finno-Ugric in terms of linguistics and of Turkic origin in terms of genetics. Sami Group in Finland One of them is not to mention the Finnish Tatars: ) they already belong to the kuman-kipchak branch of Turkishness. Let's come to the Khazars, Karaites and Karaims Turkish Group. These groups are generally accepted as Jewish Karaim, Caspian and Karaite Turks living in Poland, Ukraine and Lithuania in the mountainous regions of Azerbaijan and Khazars of Karachays. The Turks living in the Altai Khakasya and Yakut, istan regions, which are considered to be the homeland of the Turks living in the Siberian region of Russia, generally continue to believe in Tengrizim (Shamanism), which is the first belief of the Turks. As a note, Greetings and Love from Turkey to everyone reading this article. Thank you for this video you made.
I did a bit of an extended research into this, since there is very little information available on the surface. The reason it's so hard to pinpoint the exact ancestors of the Turks, is because there isn't a single ancestor, we are a mixed people. Most historians agree that the Ashina clan is definitely at least one ancestor of the Turks. The Ashina were a nomadic people from today's China. They lived around modern Pingliang. Ashina was first attested to in the year 439, as reported by the Book of Sui: on the 18th day of the 10th month, the Tuoba ruler Emperor Taiwu of Northern Wei overthrew Juqu Mujian of Northern Liang in eastern Gansu, and 500 Ashina families fled northwest to the Rouran Khaganate near Gaochang (Bayingolin area today). Here they encountered the Tocharians (who lived in Tarim Basin) and joined the Goache (göçebe) Turkic tribes that were migrating from the North West, Altai region (they originally came from around Crimea and were probably related to the Schytians. They lived between the Black Sea and the Altai mountains and were migrating east). Ashina mixed with the Goache tribes, and then for an unknown reason (possibly through a defeat and subjugation as was common) joined the Rouran Khanate. Rouran was a more mixed tribe made of many ethnic minorities like the Xianbei (ancestors of Mongols) and Tungusic people. This brings us to the Xianbei, which is another part of the Turkic ancestry. Xianbei were nomadic people from the North East, from Korea and Siberia regions, one of the most notable Xianbei federation is the Tungusic people. So, Xianbei came from the North East, Goache came from the Nort West, and the Ashina came from the South, around the area between Tarim Basin and Ordos Plateau is where all these different people met and mingled with each other. They mixed with each other, and at one point, the Ashina overthrew the Rouran dynasty and founded the Gokturk Empire. It's important to know that there were other Gokturk tribes and confederations that coexisted with the Gokturks, and were usually crushed by the Ashina. The Oghuz was one such confederation, they were later broken up and incorporated into the Gokturks. So, although Ashina's Gokturk empire might be the first one recorded in history thanks to the Northern Wei documents (who were a Xianbei dynasty themselves) they weren't the only ones or probably even the first ones. Ashina was just one tribe, but the Goache, and Xianbei, were a whole confederacy made of many people, and when they all mixed with the Xiongnu, Xianbei, Tocharians, Goache, etc, there were dozens and dozens of Turkic tribes and confederations small and large. We didn't even touch the other confederacies such as the Dingling which were a Turkic confederacy of horse cart nomads that is believed to have travelled more from South West maybe from around Iran or India to China. We just happen to know more about the most famous one because that's the main one we have written evidence of primarily.
Turks don't have anything to do with Chinese. At least from 700CE they were forbidden to mix with them. Turks originate from Caucasus and Volga/Ural region. They expanded out of that area to the east to Altays, and to the West.
I recently discovered an ant colony in my back yard. I was watching hundreds of ants coming and going from the same hole in the ground. I couldn't tell the difference between one or the other. If a superior race of beings visited the earth I suspect they would hover over us and think to themselves "Hmmm, look at all of those ants."
0:27 This ancient Turks facial reconstruction is accurate, at least for their ruling class. recently, The first genetic analysis on the Empress Ashina in 2023 by Xiaoming Yang et al. found nearly exclusively Northeast Asian ancestry (97,7%) next to minor West-Eurasian components (2,7%). The ancient Türkic royal family of the Göktürk Khaganate was found to share genetic affinities to post-Iron Age Tungusic and Mongolic pastoralists, while having heterogeneous relationships towards various Turkic-speaking groups, suggesting genetic heterogeneity and multiple sources of origin for the population of the Turkic Khaganate. According to the authors, these findings "once again validates a cultural diffusion model over a demic diffusion model for the spread of Turkic languages" and refutes "the western Eurasian origin and multiple origin hypotheses" in favor of an East Asian origin for the Türks.[4]
Many Mongolian tribes are originally of Turkic origin, thus western Mongolics have around 35-40% Turkic blood. However, I don't know how much Turkic blood the Tungusic peoples have.
Empress Ashina doesn't have Y-DNA as she is female. In females you cannot say anything about the genetic heritage without getting the samples of male relatives of her paternal side just by looking their autosomal genes. This DNA results don't match any of the DNA samples with the rest of Kok Turk samples. Besides Mukhan Kagan who was the father of Empress Ashina is always mentioned as red haired lapice blue eyes. Obviously either Empress Ashina was just an adopted daughter of Mukhan Kagan or simply the reading of her autosomal genes is inaccurate.
When I look at the faces of Turks, I see very wide cheekbones and a straight head. a purely asian trait. But there is no such thing in Greeks, Armenians, Persians. I think we are a mixture of Anatolian and Turks.
We Anatolians are aware of our genetic diversity. We are honored by this., we know everything. What some Armenians and Greeks dont want to understand is Your language and your culture is a thing and your DNA is a different thing because the DNA It is very open to environmental influences and that not explain what your culture or language. Being a nation is not about genes, it is about will and ideas. We are interested in glorifying One Anatolia instead of calling our homeland anatolia's part like Greeater Kurdistan, Greeater Armenia, Greeater Greece or Pontus. You have different narratives that break it up into pieces. We anatolians have not yet assimilated enough to think that we need to divide our homeland into pieces. For us Anatolia is first. that's why we are clearly very different. Because here is our motherland. It is not the genes that make up great nations. It is their struggle together. never forget this. The concept of Turkish nation is not based on a race, origin or racism, but on the concept of "Turkish Citizenship" and the principle of "Equality", framed by Articles 66 and 10 of the Constitution. According to the provision of Article 66/1 of the Constitution, the Turkish nation does not refer to a race but to all citizens in this country and is a concept that embraces all people living on these lands. The concept of Turkishness is not an ethnic and biological concept, but a sociological and cultural one. It does not express belonging to race, but to the country and the Turkish Nation. Like Brazilian nation, Australian, Canadian or American nation. You know what I'm saying? For us Turk means our unite not like an origin. it is a cultural consept. just like how you feel when you hear irish, germans, british or africans living in America says that ''I'm an American first''. and same expression here, When we say we are Turkish nation and this is our unite idea, it does not mean that we reject our roots. when all ottoman ethnics living in anatolia says that I'm a part of Turkish nation first, this is same idea as being American nation first. they want to express their unity. To fail to understand this, one must persist in bad faith or devalue the law of existence of one's own country. one day the world will understand us more clear, respect our struggle for unity and will stop developing distorted interpretations of history about us that caused major world wars. We are peaceful people and our unity must be respected. Turkish nation with its people in both east and west are the only people in the world who carry Anatolian spesific pool genes at the highest rate. So in accordance with the laws you are subject in your country; Please respect their right to exist as a nation and their ideas. Anatolia means "Land of Mothers" in Turkish. Here is our motherland. Respect our will for peace!
Yes but 90% of nationalist idiots don't understand that and believe that they're the direct descendants of Alparslan and 100% Turkic. Even though they have round eyes and are dark skinned or blonde with blue eyes.
I am from Paphlagonia region in the Western Black Sea Region. Civilizations such as Palaic, Bithynians, Paphlagons, Hittites, Lydians and Phrygians ruled here. Later, the Turks came and added sauce to this soup. Therefore, as Turks researching our past, we know that we are the descendants of a mixture of all these peoples.
@@onur6557 Abkhazians are not Paphlagonians. Your Abkhazian roots probably come from those who took refuge in the Ottoman Empire after the Russian invasion of the Caucasus.
@@turkcukayi Yes I am aware of that I expressed myself wrong I am half-Paphlagonian :) My Abkhazian ancestors came from Gagra in 1878 first to Karadeniz Eregli and then to Amasra.
@@onur6557 I did not know that there was an Abkhazian migration to the Western Black Sea. I thought more Circassians were coming. The genocidal Russians exiled all the peoples of the Caucasus to Anatolia.
I myself am from Trabzon our geographical location is very mountainous which leads to very isolated communities, which means that every village could have a vastly different genetic admixture. Including the fact that villagers rarely married outside of their village.
Yeah my family is from around there too. When you think the generic Trabzonian, you think a person who speaks in an accent that's derived from Mufti accent. With Greek tonalities and such But mine are from Dulkadir migrations, strictly Turkic accents that has nothing to do with Trabzon or North Eastern Anatolian Trabzon's people are strictly sunni muslim, but mine is alevi with a ton of shamanistic faiths and beliefs etc. And these people are supposed to be from the same province.
@@bitter_truth8646 I am also from there, there were Pontus people there, but everyone there proudly says they are Turkish, including me. We have Greek speaking relatives. this is a very interesting but beautiful thing
i am a Real Anatolian Turkish and have Q1b1 yDNA, native american gernes, beringian genes, polynesian genes, austrilian aborgin genes, inuit genes, %2.6 japan and korean too. But mostly caucasus hunter gatherers, european hunter gatherers, and native Anatolian farmer genes.
@@whitepouch0904 Native Americans have hook noses and robust headshapes with only few Asian features. East Asian/Siberian are flat face people, how can they be the same? Maybe the Inuits, Eskimo are.
The number of nomads of Turkic origin that migrated to Anatolia is a matter of discussion. According to Ibn Sa'id al-Maghribi, there were 200,000 Turkmen tents in Denizli and its surrounding areas, 30,000 in Bolu and its surrounding areas, and 100,000 in Kastamonu and its surrounding areas.[25][26]According to a Latin source, at the end of the 12th century, there were 100,000 nomadic tents in the regions of Denizli and Isparta.[27] According to Ottoman tax archives, in modern-day Anatolia, in the provinces of Anatolia, Karaman, Dulkadir and Rûm, there were about 872,610 households in the 1520s and 1530s; 160,564 of those households were nomadic, and the remainder were sedentary. Of the four provinces, Anatolia (which does not include the whole of geographic Anatolia but only its western and some of its northwestern parts) had the largest nomadic population with 77,268 households. Between 1570 and 1580, 220,217 households of the overall 1,360,474 households in the four provinces were nomadic, which means that at least 20% of Anatolia was still nomadic in the 16th century. The province of Anatolia, which had the largest nomadic population with 77,268 households, saw an increase of its nomadic population to 116,219 households in those years.[28]
Can you really rely on these numbers from 500 years ago? It seems too accurate for its time. I heard one citizen of Turkiye did his own genetic test and found out he is 90 percent Greek. He became so depressed and committed suicide. Are citizens of today's Turkiye that brainwashed and chauvinist? I hope that story of Suicide is a lie. .. California.
My family are Turkmen from birecik urfa, and according to the great professor Ilber ortayli the oldest form of Turkish spoken in turkey is in birecik urfa.
@@teknul89 My family is from the Barak tribe in Gaziantep, which lies directly on the Syrian border. I know that our tribe used to live in Nevsehir but were exiled into the Syrian desert and various parts of the Ottoman Empire (even Bosnians with the surname Barakovic can trace their ancestry to us.) But back to your original question, there is a dialect continuum between the Antep dialects and the Türkmen dialects in Aleppo/Halep. The Türkmen spoken in Iraq is more of a transitionary dialect between the Turkish spoken in Turkey and the Azeri dialects in Iran.
@@hakanozaslan9571Yes but all those Turk from Iraq and Syria came from Turkey before when there was Ottoman Empire, Seljuk empire and Mamluk time but was sent to Syria and Iraq for expanding their Territories Both people do not identify themselves as being Turkmen from Turkmenistan even though the real Turks from Turkey came from Turkmenistan but the Turks from Syria and Iraq they should have went back to Turkey where their culture is more alike That’s interesting because your Tribe Barak seems to have come from Khorasan before they came to Gaziantep which they left in year about 1382-1383 they were part of the tribe of Uzun Hasan he was the leader of Aq Qoyunlu (White Sheeps) this tribe it used to be Alevi until Uzun Hasan death Feriz Bey became their leader he was also called Firuz or Fürüz bey he was a Sunni and converted this tribe to Sunni Muslims and 4 thousand Abdal tents led by Ashik Dedemoğlu migrated to the vicinity of Yozgat in Anatolia. The tribe had problems with Ottoman Empire so they sensed them to Şanlıurfa, Akçakale in the most southern place in Şanlıurfa province Feriz Bey proposed a return to the land of Ajam and Turkestan, with the unanimous support of the tribe's elders. together with Ashik Dedemoğlu, he traveled to Iran to negotiate a migration with the Shah, who accepted the proposal. But the ottomans were trying to tax the tribe and Baraks they fought ottoman and was mad at them for what they did to them I never knew the Turkish Soup Ezogelin it came from your tribe it taste good 😊 I don’t know about the Bosnians about that I don’t think it has anything to do with Barak tribe must have been a coincidence because if you look at famous people who has that last name they have that and they are not from Turkey even some Croatians have this last name too
Did you make this video on your phone? If you did that might explain why the visuals cut out 10 seconds in, so don't use your phone to make videos they always get scrambled, I notice it a lot in UA-cam shorts.
Who cares what you are just be human love is all we need. The world is my country and the people in it are all my brothers and sisters. And all living beings including all nature we are all one . Peace ✌️. By the way I am Turk .😊❤
Mate, you look very Romanian. You look like my cousin LOL definitely a lot of mixing. People from the Middle East all think I am part of their people and they are surprised when I tell them I am Romanian. A pleasant surprise on their part, for some reason people just find Romanians very likable. I choose my words and my actions very carefully, only because there are so few Romanians around the world that I consider myself a kind of Ambassador for Romanians. I'm good at everything I do only because I don't want to let down my ancestors so I always strive to be the best
There's very middle eastern looking Europeans and very European looking middle easterners. It isn't so much because of mixing but rather both regions aren't so racially (phenotypically) distinct from one another. Your average Roman and Dacian ancestor may not look like scandanavians key word being on average, and may pass for an Iranian and whatnot
Yeah. Turks are basically a hybrid of East Asian and those from the Caucasus. Basically, it's what someone would look like if a German and Chinese had a kid.
not at all. people from turkey have around 5% turkish dna. the rest is italian, greek, iranian and caucasian. the hybrid you are talking about are like people from tajikestan and many hazaras from afghanistan who got mixed.
@@BubbleGumFae Germans have some Finnish mixtures and the proto Finns are Uralics that carry similiar dna with Altaics. Eurocentrists are going to deny.
This clearly means that nationalism is often wrongly correlated ethnicity when it has more to do with culture assimilation. This true for Turkiye as well as historical Turkic states such as Golden Horde & Chaghtai Khanate whose rulers were ethnic Mongols but assimilated in the culture and religion of their Bulgar, Tatar and Cuman-Kipchak population. Same goes for Ikhanate who adopted the culture of their Iranian and Persian populace. Kazakhs have threee jhuzz; Senior, Middle and Junior comprising of both Turkic and Mongolic ancestry.
Ethnicity does not mean genes but cultural identity which is formed within a group . They can be more similar genetically or less , this is not what matters. What matters is cultural identity Which forms ethnic groups
persians or turkic people never before in history did identify themselves through ethnicity rather through culture and environment. Idk why so many people are obsessed with something which never played an role before for these people
@@randomguy-kn1wl exactly. I am sick of Iranians and Turks. They act as if Turkic and Iranic are not twrms used for language families and instead think all Turkic or Iranic people have same genetics
@@JayzsMrIt’s only the Turkic language and nothing more in common: Neither culture nor genetic background nor common ancestry is in common between a citizen of Turkey and, say, Kazakhstan. It is confused with ethnicity or even race.
My ancestors were nomadic, they rode their horses across vast lands. so that means they married very different cultures:, I mean Russian, Ukranian, Bulgarian, Rum, Armenian, Kurdish, Iranian, Jewish, etc etc. How can I describe this: maybe "steppe tolerance"? And here we are... My gf is Russian, I speak Turkish my "culture" is Turkish. And I don't give a flying fuck about my "origin" XD
Western authors give additional details about mixed marriages and the children born into such unions. The Latin historians of the Crusades noted in Anatolia a specific group of the Turkopouli (that is, 'the children of the Turks') who were born of a Greek mother and a Turkish father.53 For the beginning of the fourteenth century, the Catalan soldier and chronicler Ramon Muntaner reports that the Turks of western Anatolia married girls from noble Greek families. It is especially interesting that the male children of these mixed marriages 'became Turks and were circumcised', while for female children the choice of religion was free. The same difference between the religious affiliation of boys and girls was reported by Ludolf von Suchen in the middle of the fourteenth century. Von Suchen maintains that when the Turks married Christian women, the boys of the mixed marriages followed the Muslim religion of their fathers while the girls maintained the Christian faith of their mothers.54 However, as we have seen in Byzantine canonical texts, boys also could be baptised by their mothers. These reports confirm that, firstly, mixed marriages between Muslims and Greek women were common throughout the centuries, and, secondly, that the children of both Muslim and mixed marriages were baptised according to Orthodox Greek rites. The popularity of mixed marriages in Muslim lands has been very clearly demonstrated by a passage from the Byzantine historian of the fifteenth century, Doukas, who, with considerable arrogance, made the following observance about the Ottoman Turks: The people of this shameless and savage nation, moreover, do the following: if they seize a Greek woman or an Italian woman or a woman of another nation or a captive or a deserter, they embrace her as an Aphrodite or Semele, but a woman of their own nation or of their own tongue they loathe as though she were a bear or a hyena. 55 The predominance of Greek women at the Seljuk harem thus seems to have been merely a royal variation of a common practice in Muslim Anatolia. Greek women were valued as the most prestigious marriage partners among all strata of Muslim society. It was Greek women who guided their Muslim husbands and masters into the refined Byzantine way of life and the world of Byzantine luxury, introducing among other things new cuisines and ways of structuring the household. Although the information on Seljuk marriage policy in the eleventh to twelfth century is scarce, it seems highly probably that the Seljuk harem was modelled along similar lines as other strata of Muslim Anatolian society, with a preference of marriage to Greek women who in turn acted as mediators to the old world of the 'empire of the Romans'. Peacock, A. and Yildiz, S., 2012. The Seljuks of Anatolia.
The surname Turci is an Italian name derived from the Latin word “turcus”, which means “Turkish”. Due to the prevalence of Italian diaspora, the variant spellings of Turci can be found all around the world. The Turcilingi (also spelled Torcilingi or Thorcilingi) were an obscure barbarian people, or possibly a clan or dynasty, who appear in historical sources relating to Middle Danubian peoples who were present in Italy during the reign of Romulus Augustulus (475-76).
If you wanna go further back, they were from a small region in Manchuria. That's where the ancestors of Proto Turks/Mongolic/Tungusic and Japonic people are allegedly from
Hi youtuber friend! Thanks a lot, I have seen your study about Turkey with our turkic euroasian, central asian and northeast asian ancestry. But again you told like western euroasians are unrelated with turkic people. I will repeat my idea: Saka/Scythian people of euroasia are related to turkic east euroasian, northeast and central asian people. They have been assimilated to indoarian language by persians and caucasian arians during their journey tousands years ago. (Starting from 30k BC to 10k BC with same special stone forming culture) I. Darius (old persian king) claims himself as "persian of persians, arian of arians" and mentioned about Saka people as foreign people by their central asian origins. Saka means nomad in old persian like some turkic people call themselves as Yürük meaning nomad even today. Persians (mostly J2 M172) fighted against Saka people of central asia (as written in wiki) and won against turkic central asians and assimilated them by power. Asian hunnic empire and their ancestors are from northeast asia and spread to west and south, some has passed over persia, mesopotamia, anatolia, balkans to euroasia and west europe. Some have become Saka by persian language. Some have changed to european languages. This is why turkic, ugric, hunnic (also you showed a picture of ak-khion = white hun like north indian huns at 0:28) and the other altaic, uralic, native american people have similar genetics. Their N, O, P, Q, R, R1, R1a, R1b, R2 haplogroups are very different from indoeuropeans: F, G, H, I1, I2, J2, L haplogroups... Altaic, uralic genetics even spread to west and north europe in tousands years. I do not mean all are turkic, but history and science should inspect, understand that they are related to altaic, uralic people.
@@مهردادبیرانوندی As linguistically yes, but genetically all R1, R1a, R1b, R2 are descendants of P haplogroup of C3, N, O3, P ancient northern east asians ANEA. ANEA are descendants of southeast asian K2, C2 and all were speaking a group of uralic-altaic + dene-caucasian language. ANEA were speaking uralic-altaic languages as referenced from Martine Robeets. Even R haplogroup is uyghur turkic today and Yakut (Sakut) and Soyot turkic people are speaking still turkic. Soyot, Altai, Tuva people are modern P haplogroup people. Sumerians were named Sagh-gir/Saka by old persians, but they called themselves as Kenghir meaning Huns (Khan-s in english and Khiang-nu in chinese). Sumerian is one of dene-caucasian language family as agglutinative.
@@مهردادبیرانوندی Iranians do not drink kumiss, do not bury their dead in kurgans, do not know tamga. There is no concrete historical source that the Scythians were Iranian. You can read the writings of Plinius Secundus and do historical research.
Are you able to find the background from the last name? I am American Lebanese.. from my last name you can tell it's Turkish "Yazigi".. which means "writer".. my grandfather has blue eyes, my father Green eyes.. I would like to know where in Turkey.
Hi sir I’m from Afghanistan and my ethnicity is called Hazara. Can you please do a deep research and analysis on Hazara ethnicity, DNA, origin where we came from, and a little bit of our history.
سلام من از ایرانم خیلی از تست ژنتیک های هزار ها را دیده ام بسیاری از افراد دارای ژن مغولی بودن و مقداری کمتر ترکی و مقدار کمتر غرب آسیایی ( شبیه ایران و ترکیه و...)
Sayings of different peoples about the Turks. 1. A chicken is not a bird, a Turk is not a person (Ukrainian proverb) 2. If you want to conceive a child for a Turkish woman, finish her slippers, the flies will finish the job. (Folk proverb) 3. An uninvited guest is like a Turk (Russian proverb) 4. Turkey, the country of the small mind (Slavatian proverb) 5. Rather, a chicken will take off than a Turk will learn to love. (Arabic saying) 6. If you are dealing with a Turk, do not let go of your stick. (Armenian proverb) 7. If you want the Turk to obey you, hit him with a stick. (Armenian proverb) 8. The devil has many guises, the main of which is Turkic. (Assyrian proverb) 9. Where the Turk's foot has gone, the grass does not grow. (Bulgarian proverb) 10. If a Turk speaks of peace, then there will be war. (Greek saying) 11. Bad life, that neighborhood with a Turk. (Kurdish proverb) 12. People are building, the Turks are destroying. (Serbian proverb) 13. The rooster will not lay eggs, and the Turk will not become a man. (Romanian proverb) 14 A jealous husband is like a Turk. (Kozma Prutkov) 15. The Turk is the harbinger of the devil.(Folk proverb) 16. Dirty shit. A good person will not be called a Turk. (Folk proverb) 17. Turks are the weeds of the universe. (Folk proverb) 18. Turks are terribly arrogant, nasty and just bad people (Folk proverb) 19. Turks stupid freaks. They insolently stick to the girls of other nations, sincerely considering them ALL prostitutes and just fools obsessed with sex. Dirty, smelly goats... 20. Turkey was built entirely on foreign blood, by foreign forces and foreign means. This nation of pigs “gave” only chaos to the world and could only create such an “invention” as genocide.
Seems like some bitter and envious shitwords about Turks. :D LOL Guess Turks are on the right way if them are criticized and judged by others. Good for them.
These are very filthy mouths. We have a Turkish saying: 'After all, everyone offers what they eat to the other person!'.We can tell what they eat from their dirty mouths. so They or their ancestors tried to offer something from what they ate, that's all.
Turks, as an ethnic group, exhibit a wide range of phenotypes, which can be attributed to their complex history and the vast geography in which they have settled. It is important to note that phenotype is not the same as DNA, as genes determine many biological traits in humans, while phenotype only encompasses a fraction of these traits. It is possible for individuals with similar phenotypes to be genetically distinct from one another, while individuals with very different phenotypes may be genetically similar. This highlights the complexity of the relationship between genetics and phenotype, and the importance of considering both when studying human populations. The study of genetic makeup in ancient populations is a complex and nuanced field, with several potential pitfalls. One significant challenge is the fact that DNA samples extracted from ancient burial sites often come from noble classes or royal families, while samples obtained from contemporary populations often come from common people. This can make it difficult to accurately compare the genetic makeup of ancient and contemporary populations. One example of this issue can be found in the comparison of medieval Turks (and possibly proto-Turks) with Iranic people. While the noble class of Turkish populations engaged in marriages with nobles from neighboring states and empires as a way of obtaining dowries and acquiring new lands, the noble class of Iranic people practiced incest marriages in order to protect their noble blood. This difference in cultural practices means that it would be misleading to compare the genetic makeup of medieval and proto-Turks with ancient Iranic people in order to determine which group had more West Eurasian genes. Even in the DNA of (proto) Turks belonging to the noble class, who were heavily mixed with Asiatic populations, there is a significantly higher rate of West Eurasian genes compared to East Eurasian populations. This suggests that these groups initially had West Eurasian roots. It is also important to note that the DNA samples extracted from these groups do not accurately represent the common populations, so it can be assumed that the common people in these countries had diverse populations with a tendency towards West Eurasian. The comparison of genetic makeup in ancient and contemporary populations can be a complex task, and care must be taken to consider the limitations and biases of the available DNA samples. It’s insignificant whether Turks were blond or not. Yet, the fact that the Chinese described Turks as having distinctively different physical characteristics from the Iranic people is significant. The Iranic people are typically described as having physical characteristics similar to Semitic people like the Assyrians or Indian people, while the Turks are described as having blond or light-colored hair and distinctive eye and nose features. This raises the question of who the Turks mixed with to have these distinctive physical characteristics in western and eastern Mongolia, where there are no other populations with West Eurasian genes except for the Turks. It is also worth considering how the Turks could have acquired such distinctive physical traits if they had East Asian origins. Contemporary Turks can be distinguished from both West Eurasian and East Eurasian people based on their genetic makeup. In comparison to West Eurasian people, Turks have a higher proportion of East Eurasian genes in their DNA, which is not typically found in the genetic makeup of West Eurasian people. On the other hand, Turks can be distinguished from East Eurasian people by the significantly higher proportion of West Eurasian genes in their DNA, suggesting that they have West Eurasian roots and have mixed with East Eurasian people at some point in their history. This is the main difference between Turks and both West Eurasian and East Eurasian people. It is important to note that genetically, neither West Eurasian genes nor East Eurasian genes determine ethnicities. Rather, they are indicators of migration patterns and ancestral roots. The gene pools of ethnicities naturally enlarge over time as a result of intermarriage and other forms of genetic exchange, and this continuous process is one of the reasons why genetics cannot be used to determine ethnicities with certainty. It is important to recognize that genetics can provide insight into the migration patterns and ancestral roots of certain groups of people, but it does not determine their ethnicity or cultural identity.
It is possible for individuals with similar phenotypes to be genetically distinct from one another, while individuals with very different phenotypes may be genetically similar. This highlights the complexity of the relationship between genetics and phenotype, and the importance of considering both when studying human populations. THAT IS THE FACT! I TOTALLY AGREE WITH YOU! AND BIOLOGY AGREES WITH YOU.
Intermarriage between Turks and Greek, Armenian and Georgian natives of Anatolia was not unheard of, although the majority of these unions were between Turkish men and Christian women. The children of these unions, known as 'Mixovarvaroi', were raised as Turks and were of the Muslim faith (although there were some cases of Mixovarvaroi defecting to the Byzantines). It is likely that these unions played a role in the eventual diminishment of the Christian population in Anatolia and its transition from Greek/Christian to Turkish/Muslim. [24] Vryonis Jr, Speros (1971). The Decline of Medieval Hellenism in Asia Minor and the Process of Islamization from the Eleventh through the Fifteenth Century. California: Berkeley University Press. p. 176.
This %30 includes R1a and some J2 subbranches,even with adding them it doesn't go up more than %32,which is lover than turkish autosomal central asian admixture
In fact, the science of archeology and genetics has shown that the kings of Gok Turks were Iranian, Gok Turks were a combination of several races and ethnicities, especially the Indo-Iranian tribes, the Pashtuns of Afghanistan are descended from Gok Turks.
I am Turkish and when I asked my origin or which Turk tribe we were from, my grandmother said Kayı tribe. I had just started watching Diriliş Ertuğrul and I was very happy to hear that I was descended from my grandfather Ertuğrul Gazi :D 🐺🇹🇷 Anyway, we entered Anatolia with the Battle of Manzikert. Years later, during the reign of Sultan Alaeddin, Söğüt became ours and we emigrated there. According to what my grandmother said, we were a family known as the Sarılar/Sarular or Saruhanlar back then. And this family of mine went to the Caucasus years later. But towards the end of the Ottoman Empire, due to the persecution of the Turks in the Caucasus, they migrated to the Black Sea region of Turkiye and lived there for a long time. That's why we have both a little Circassianism and Lazism. Of course, maybe I have mistakes, but in general, the historical story of my family was something like thiss. And btw There are many Turks with a similar story like me. This may be the reason why we got mixed. Because we constantly migrated.
This is why my DNA showed up Caucasus, Italy/Greece, ME, Africa North but I’m half Cypriot through my mother side. I don’t understand how Melanesian showed up as well.
What a wonderful story. About 9,000 years ago, you and my common ancestors, who grew millet around Liaohe in northeastern China and overcame the winter cold, would have imagined that you and I would be standing on opposite sides of the globe and meeting on UA-cam.
However, a fundamental fact is left out in this confusion, which means that when listing many nations, we are ultimately only talking about one people, if the white man is included. For example. we are talking about the Huns, whose predecessors were the Scythians. The power of the Huns spread from ocean to ocean, plus they conquered 3/4 of North Africa and India, and of course their descendants remained everywhere. Another example, today's Ukraine and Russia were also inhabited by Scythians, Huns, the Roman slaveholder empire was liquidated.If you take off the clothes of today's nations, it turns out that they all have something in common, this is only possible if, for example, let's look at the Slavs, Scythians inhabited the land, the Mongol invasion came, they became slaves, hence their new name, but the people were not genetically modified.The Royal Szítas, who defeated the Mongols three times in 1242, 1285, 1342, were able to preserve their national intentions.There are countless proofs of this, e.g. China built a museum in honor of the Royal Scythians, the state of Bihar in India was also named after the Royal Scythians, because such a county still exists in their country, Etruscans also come from the Royal Scythians, Italian researchers prove.
Iyıde Osmanlı kayı degıl ki tımur yenılgısı sonrası Türkmenlerin destegını kaybedınce öyle bısey öne surmuslerdır 😅😅😅😅 halıl ınancık dınle ve sen kayı ol Zehra lakın bin yıldır Anadolu halkları ıle kaynaşıp kanı kaybettın Türklüğün tartışılır ve kayı dahı olsan kayının k sı kaldıysa dua et 😅😅😅😅😅😅
@@zehra0628 hahaha sadece kanı kaybetmıs ınsansın kayı degıl k sı kalmadı ;) Türk kanını kültürünü korumuş olandır Anadolu çoğu yerlı halkların devırmesı o yerlı halklar ıle bın yıldır kaynaşan da Türk degıldır kanı kaybetmıstır kayı ımıs :))))))))))) sen gerçek kayı ısen gerçekten Türk ısen ben Mete hanım :) kanen Türk sadece orta Asya’dır İran veya Anadolu karışım mıllettır bılgın olsun yerlıler çok dha fazlaydı bin yıldır kaynaşıyorsun sımdı yallah kültürün de Arab’ın dır
Hey I took a DNA test and after a whole life of thinking I was pure Italian the test came back with heritage in Greece turkey Iran and Iraq. I'm looking to do a deeper test to kind of close in the main 2 between my mom and dad I came from.
I'm Iranian and I'm not Turkish but recently I discovered I have Turkish ancestry so my dads great great great grandfather was the great grandson of a Turkish chiftan or khan as they say and this guy was famous in Iran we searched him up so cool
Hi there! I suggested you watch the guy’s other video about DNA history of Italy, and then you will realise that there is no such thing as pure Italians in the first place. Modern Italians genetically, speaking are such a wild mixture of north, and south, east and west, in various proportions: the concept of pure Italian is just not existing.
@@DeYiZhiMusilin I see! It's almost like one of the "migration centers" of the world that developed its own strange mixed language and everyone is either African Asian or European lol
Turks had contacted Chinese long before Persians, Arabs and Europeans During Beizhou dynasty, Ashina, a Göktürk Princess married a Chinese emperor and became a Chinese empress. Her tomb now is in China. Göktürk had their own inscripions in Mongolian and written in both their own language and Chinese.
Historically the descendants of Mongols, but genetically modern day Turks are descendants of Greeks Persians Armenians that were forcefully Turkified through various brutal practices like e.g. devshirme. Practically no central Asian DNA from their place of historical origin in modern day Turks. I can't imagine how it must feel to know that your forefathers were Greeks and one of your great grandparents might have been enslaved or abducted as a child and forcefully indoctrinated to denounce his own kind his and his own parents...
@@xenofonkarykis8417 In fucking 11th century Literally 700 years after their dominion emerged It's just that tribes went westwards. You can call mongols upjumped weasels who had the courage to emerge when nobody was around
Seljuks were %35-%40 Asian and were between Uzbeks and Turkmens autosomally. They didn't look like some Han Chinese. All Turkics are Eurasians. A mix of West and East Eurasian. Modern Turks have %7-%22 east Eurasian ancestry. Thus modern TURKS ARE %20-%45 Seljuk. If you don't know anyting about genetics it's not my fault. Also our non Turkic part is not a monolith either. Modern Anatolian Turks have only %35 ANF ancestry. Hittites had %60+. So no we are not same people with ancient Anatolians at all. A simple calculation of Turkish west Between Medieval samples in Vahaduo; Target: Turkish(West) Distance: 0.6720% / 0.00672047 31.2 KAZ_Kipchak 30.2 Anatolia_Center_Phrygian_650BC 16.4 Paleo-Balkan+Slavic_MNE_Doclea_Bjelovine 9.2 Caucasus_BlackSea_Samsun_B_150BC 8.0 IRN_Hasanlu_IA 5.0 Levant_Sidon_1800BC
Lmao what I posted is directly from Vahaduo. You can hate as much as you want. Truth won't change. Target: Turkish(West) Distance: 0.6720% / 0.00672047 31.2 KAZ_Kipchak 30.2 Anatolia_Center_Phrygian_650BC 16.4 Paleo-Balkan+Slavic_MNE_Doclea_Bjelovine 9.2 Caucasus_BlackSea_Samsun_B_150BC 8.0 IRN_Hasanlu_IA 5.0 Levant_Sidon_1800BC@@Paraglidecrete
@@xdd87 part of the lyrics in Greek say about keys to secret rooms that should be kept away so nobody sees them , any idea what is the meaning Recebim - Hey Gidi Hey (Horon) Cinan Müzik 639K subscribers 20,683,292 views
3:39 This Example is Half Turk Half Sogdian, Also The Turkmens Are Mixture Of Oghuz And Persian People And Not Pure Oghuz. Ancient Oghuzs Are Most Similar to Modern Karakalpaks, Nogais, Bashkirs and Siberian Tatars. The Turks who settled in Anatolia for the first time are closer to the Nogai and Karakalpaks than the Turkmen and they have around %50 East Asian genetics. The Turkmens Are %25 East Asian.
That is so wrong. Turkmens are not mixed with persians, not even today. And turkmens are not as little as 25% east asian, they are more east asian than the turkish and azeries
Starostin, George (2016). "Altaic Languages". Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Despite the validity of many of these objections, it remains unclear whether they are sufficient to completely discredit the hypothesis of a genetic connection between the various branches of “Altaic,” which continues to be actively supported by a small, but stable scholarly minority.
Do you remember Hz Muhammed grandson of Husayn ibn Ali? Don't you think this is forgetting just starting what Timur did Yezid grave compare what I will do nothing. Everyone own free will, crushed all the Türk enemies thanks for remind us kuteybe bin muslim genocide of Turks such as Khorosan, Curcan and Talkan.
Let me clear this out also Türkçe yazicam bunu cemaat ve Tarikatlarin en büyüğü masonlar asılacak ve silinecek diğer cemaat ve tarikatlarda bunun içinde Mehdi çok büyük temizlik yapicak gelen deli bir kişi hepinizi kesicek zalimlerin.
Türkçe yazıcam bunu cemaat ve tarikatlarin en büyüğü masonlar asılacak ve silinecek diğer cemaat ve tarikatlarda bunun içinde Mehdi çok büyük temizlik yapicak gelen deli bir kişi hepinizi kesicek zalimlerin artık siz düşünün nereye kacicaksiniz sizin acı cigliklarinizi göğün 8 katında inletecek bütün evren duyucak Mehdi emin olcak herkes duydu.
Thomas Edward Lawrence CB DSO (16 August 1888 - 19 May 1935) was a British archaeologist, army officer, diplomat, and writer who became renowned for his role in the Arab Revolt (1916-1918) and the Sinai and Palestine Campaign (1915-1918) against the Ottoman Empire during the First World War.
I live by the Black Sea coast. I am Turkish and I know that some of my ancestors are Oghuz and some of them are Kipchaks. According to my uncle, my maternal side is Scythian. But I know that my father was a definite Oghuz Turk. Although gene analyzes of Turks show some of them as Greek and some as Balkan, the general characteristic of Turks is their short stature. If you examine the height differences, you can analyze how the Turks and Anatolia are shorter than the surrounding countries and the Central Asian connection.
Oğuzuz diyorsunuz ama hangi boyun hangi aşiretinin hangi ailesine mensupsunuz? Bu bilgiler olmadan havada kalıyor. Orta Asya'da kimlikler boy bilgisi üzerinden şekillenir. Kimse kimseye nerelisin diye sormaz, boyunu aşiretini sorar. Orijinal Oğuzları Muğla civarındaki Yörükler de görüyoruz. Zaten Türkiye'de Orta Asya genetiğinin en yoğun olduğu il Muğla. Buranın Yörük Türkmenleri çoğunlukla Tatarlara benzeyen insanlar. 1000 yıl öncesine, en has hallerine gitsek bildiğimiz Moğol tipli insanlar oldukları su götürmez. Zaten son araştırmalarda Anadolu'ya gelen ilk Oğuzların Doğu Asyalı fizyonomlara sahip olduğu anlaşıldı.
@@عليياسر-ذ5ب I've met 3 Iranians before and we're definitely not alike at all. They are darker than us Turks. Maybe you look a little more like the Kurds, but you don't look exactly like the Kurds either. So you are neither Turkish nor Kurdish, we all look different from each other. We are just different nations living in the same geography.
@@عليياسر-ذ5ب No, I don't look slavic and it's not in my genes. What I'm saying is that Turks and Iranians, even Kurds, are not alike and can be distinguished. For example, I can easily distinguish between a Kurd and a Turk while walking down the street in Turkey.
Im from aegean side of Turkey and i have aralid, first tier turanid phenotype which means most asian, turkic genes and which is common in Kazakhstan 🇰🇿 My father looks like Kurya Han, just without beard
@@imnottalkingtoanatolianzombies Normal. Çünkü o bölgedekiler Yörük ve yerleşik hayata geçeli fazla olmadı. Dolayısıyla oranın yerli halklarıyla daha az karıştılar. Türkler Anadolu'da en erken yerleşik hayata Marmara Batı Karadeniz ve Orta Anadolu'da geçtiler. Bu yüzden buradakiler Anadolu'nun yerli halklarıyla daha fazla karıştılar.
@@turkcukayiyalnkz batı Karadenizde yüksek rekor sonuçlara sahip örneğin bolu, sakarya vb... Ama dediğim iç anadolu için doğru evet iç anadolu genel olarak ortalama sonuçlara sahip o da muhtemelen senin anlattığın nedenler yüzünden
It is common in the Middle East, Maghreb and even Pakistan that people lie about their heritage and say they have Turkish origin to get better acceptance....
Thank you for making this video. I enjoyed watching it. You've comparing the futures of Turkic and Chinese. I think Turkic people had Euroasian features before moving to West. Sometime I meet Turkic people from China's North West. Almost all of them look Euroasian some of them even having blue eyes. Difference between Turkic people and other groups of Chinese are very obvious. My Chinese friend told me once that I look just like European not EuroAsian because I'm an inbreed. 😂😂 Chinese have an interesting way of talking 🤗 I haven't researched much about Turks history since learning at primary school. In primary, I had learnt because of the weather conditions in Siberia, Altai mountains, there weren't much food except yogurt, kefir..., meat that type of food, they had decided moving toward warmer climate. It was decided one section of Turkic people move toward West (and those are today's Hungarian) and the other section toward South West (today's Turkiye) Of course, the movement involved many wars. However, I have read what you've mentioned on the video also in my educational research.
Turks got mixed with Scythians and Saka which are the Iranian tribes many with red hair and blue eyes before moving west. Iranians were neighbor with china as they are today in Badakhshan Tajikestan.
Iit has made it a profession to refute the Turkish Official History based on the historical view adopted by Atatürk; There are a number of writers who defend the Giladstonist, Renanist, Hitlerist, Sevrid Indo-Aryan European Official History, which stigmatizes Turks as enemies of civilization. Such writers who call themselves "historians" and make them call themselves "historians"; The theses they attacked by saying "Turkish Official History Thesis" were not actually produced by Atatürk in the 1930s; Between 1800-1876, that is, before Atatürk was born, Fergusson, Rawlinson, Layard, Oppert, Cahun, etc. They either do not know at all, or even hide this fact, that hundreds of such Western knowledge is based on their scientific determinations. Ataturk never interpreted this historical thesis as "Political Expansionism" (Panturanism) and did not apply it as such. With this scientific thesis, Atatürk proved that the Turks, whom the West regarded as barbarians, have a deep-rooted and civilized past within the human family; The West is unscientific. Atatürk responded to "political racist" insults with this scientific thesis, also produced by Western.
@@tengriaslan2423 Barbarians were Germanic, hence West. Is it any different after Barbarians. No. Look at what they did in Africa or Americans. Also, take a history or a science book written for central European schools. You'd think, Western Europe has created the world and the modern science such as maths, chemistry, physics...When Persians and Arabs were creating childrens' stories, novels and also using plants, extracting to make medicine and chemicals as medication, western Europe were killing poor drinking their blood as medicine.
@fugenturkoglu By Immigrant Europeans Applied to the Native American Turks Genocide types Ethnic massacre and Ethnic Cleansing: It was deliberately practiced by slaughtering the Native Americans. Relocation of Native Americans: It was carried out in the form of taking the Native Americans from their geography to another geography. Native American Reservation-Native American Reserve: It was implemented as the closure of Native Americans to certain places. Smallpox: It was deliberately and intentionally applied by infecting the Native Americans with old world diseases. Activities of Christian Missionaries: They were forcibly taken from their families and trained by Christian missionaries in boarding schools in Canada and the USA. The purpose of this education is to make Native American children forget their mother tonque and culture and assimilate them. Forced Sterilization: It was applied to reduce the number of Native Americans and prevent their reproduction. Colonialism: It was implemented by exploiting the underground and surface resources of the continent where the Native Americans lived. It continues to be applied especially to Brazilian and Argentine Native Americans. Mourning Day in the Native American, Feast Day in the USA The start date of the genocide against the Native Americans, October 12, is a great day of mourning as viewed by the Native Americans. Because their quiet life changed as of October 12, 1492, and the winds blew in the place of their former lives. The USA, on the other hand, called this day Columbus Day.
@@famitsus987 ANE was formed by intermixing of Basal East Asian Tiayunan men with European hunter gatherer women. Q remain majorly among North-East Asian men but R got heavily mixed with European hunter gatherers.
Nevertheless, Turkic peoples share, to varying degrees, non-linguistic characteristics like cultural traits, ancestry from a common gene pool, and historical experiences.[1]
@@papazataklaattiranimam Then why don't I see people who look like the Chinese, and I only see those who look like the people of the Middle East, the Greeks, the Romans, and the Greeks?
Thomas Edward Lawrence CB DSO (16 August 1888 - 19 May 1935) was a British archaeologist, army officer, diplomat, and writer who became renowned for his role in the Arab Revolt (1916-1918) and the Sinai and Palestine Campaign (1915-1918) against the Ottoman Empire during the First World War.
Ask your grand mother , probably she your family from one of Turks solder 350 and before Huns, (Attila ) Avar, cuman & kıpchak , Tatar , blood on your vien . I don’t know where you from abut check this empire in Europe .
A) 450 BC ? 😅 the first time the name Turk was mentioned in the history was in the 8th century ( 1200 years ago.) B) Turk= mongol + another race , any race . That is why the Turkic nations are on the same path as the Mongolian westward expansion. C) people of turkey are not Turks . Turkic world is made up of 4 races , Turco Persians, kyrgies, Uzbek and Kazak Turks . People of turkey are made up of 43 races . How could they be Turks with 43 races ? Nation of turkey was given the title of Turk by England after WWI when the ottomans were destroyed. Up to 1905 the language in turkey was 80% Farsi and 20% Arabic . D) no go ahead with your fantasy history. “ we are Oghuz Turks “ Which one of the 43 races is Oghuz ?😅
A) First of all we see once mentioned the "Turk" name at the Chinese source and its depends to b.c.e 300. B) Turks and Mongols are not the same race they are just two nation which is too close and they always seperate to different nomad groups. Also the reason of the this two different nation go through that westward together is the because of their nomadic lifestyle. You especially find the respect of the Turkic nation to Oguz Khan (who is the great Turkic Khan) and Genghis Khan (who is the great Mongol Khan) and their families. This respect not depend to came from to been same race its depends the leaders charisma. Because these two leaders was reunited the Central Asian tribes. C) People of Turkey are Turks. I notice that you dont even read any trustful source about Turks or even Ottomans :D. Even in the 1200 ac the great number of Turkmen tent (100.000 according to Latin source) mention to during Frederick Barbarossa's march through the district of Laodekia(Denizli) and the region of the Lakes (around Isparta). Thereafter we will see the more Turkmen came to Anatolia because of the Mongol invasion. Also Anatolian territories are mentioned as Turchia and Turkmenia from the Venice and Genosia sources since the ac 1200. D) I hope you don't go with your fantasy history because Turkey is been Turks since 1071 and it will be stay like that 🥲🙃🙃🥲🥲🥲🥲🥲🥲🥲🥲🥲🥲🥲🥲🥲
@@ErdalBaggal-dt6fb // When I say something I prove it . You are just telling us stories . A) this is scientific fact “ Turk is not a race .” There is no such a thing as Turk DNA. B) people of turkey came from Asia ? Your name was mentioned in 300 BC? If you had come from Asia not 2000 years ago but 20,000 or 50,000 years ago even 100,000 years ago then you would still look Asia . Evolution takes a 1000,000 years . This is fact and you can’t deny it. C) I am a Turk myself. Us Turks are 4 races: Turco Persians, kyrgies, Uzbek and Kazak Turks . People of turkey are 43 races . Scientifically it is impossible for you to be a Turk . You are Oghuz Turks ? Which one of the 43 races is Oghuz? D) in 1950 total population of Central Asia was 10 million . In 1950 population of turkey was 21 million . In 1950 there were only 30,000 Oghuz Turks in kazakistan and there were 21 million of you in turkey . How did 85 million people in turkey came from 30,000 Oghuz Turks in 70 years ? E) your country was Byzantine 500 years ago and mongol kazaks took it over. If you came from Central Asia then where did the people of Byzantine go to ? Oghuz? 😆
@@ErdalBaggal-dt6fb // The answer you want to hear can only be found in coffee shops in Turkey . Go there and everyone would think that you are genius. 😆
The thing is sure that in "Turkey" the real Turcs are in minority... They are not more then 6-7 % genetically ...This percentage rise up only 20 % culturally with Iranic people(Scythes ,Sogdians,Bactrians,Harezmians) that they assimilated in Central Asia and emigrated all together to " Turkey" ...This respectfully people ,so the real Turcs are called Turcomans(Turkmen,Yörük,Tahtaci,çepni) actually.... Who are the others 80 % ? They are the people who is converted to Islam and assimilated ti Turkish language and refuged people from Balkan(Bulgar/Pomak,Macedonians,Albanians,Bosnians...) and Caucasians people(Adigey,Chechen,Osetians,Abkhasians)... and dont forgetting the native Anatolians...
@@imnottalkingtoanatolianzombies The Turco-mongoles tribes has assimilated in Central Asia the Iranic people who is the Sogdians,Bactrians and Harezmians people... You are ignorant...I ma not fake...I am not Turc...Quite simply
No, the average medieval Turkic genetic inheritance in Anatolian Turks is between 25% and 45% Half of the genetics of Middle African Turkic communities come from eastern Iranic societies
There is no specific "origin" of the Turks. The Ottomans were an assimilated nationality. It's like saying what what is the ethnic origins of Americans? Or what is the ethnic origins of Canadians? Turkishness is a more extreme example of this but all self-proclaimed ethnic groups are of mixed heritage to various degrees. Modernist historians call this habit of collective memory "imagined communities". A person is part of x ethnic group because they believe they are part of that group. That belief is the result of being conditioned by their family and peers to have a particular identity. It's somewhat like how people are brought up to believe the same religion as their parents. (And this is all backed up with genetic testing). This doesn't mean identities are not real. Only that anyone that tries to portray themselves as racially pure needs to lay off the crack.
Turkic is a Northeast Asian language and culture that originated from the Mongolian steppe. No scholar questions the historical fact that Turkic homeland is in Mongolia and South Siberia. Whether people of Anatollia should call themselves Turks is a different issue. They speak a dialect of a Turkic language but do not carry Turkic genetics. More importantly, they don't inherit Turkic nomadic culture, Tengri philosophy, cuisines, music, clothing, etc. Whether language enough is difficult to say. Using English language doesn't make one English. Shared culture and history also an important part of identity.
@@yo2trader539 This video is referencing Turks in Turkey as DNA "origins" of the Turks. If we are talking the biological origins of the Turks in Turkey its mostly from antolia rather than Mongolia. The reality is modern Turks in Turkey have no single DNA origin
@@mydogsbutler No, the average medieval Turkic genetic inheritance in Anatolian Turks is between 25% and 45% The remaining genetic heritage of George comes from the local communities of Anatolia
According to historians and linguists, the Proto-Turkic language originated in Central-East Asia region,[39] potentially in Mongolia or Tuva.[40][41] Initially, Proto-Turkic speakers were potentially both hunter-gatherers and farmers, but later became nomadic pastoralists.[42]
@@عليياسر-ذ5ب No, Proto Turkic probably originated from an agricultural society in Northeast China associated with the Xinglongwa and Hongshan cultures.
all i know my mum was tatar and my dads family was from rize but they divorced 2 years later after i was born in Australia. my aunties use to tell me i looked asian when i was younger but not so much now.
@ddm.567 Mongols is the correct term used for two tribes from the Mongolian Plateau that united under Genghis Khan and swept across /invade Central Asia, Eastern Europe and Europe. If you knew anything about history Central Asia, Eastern Europe and Europe, ect defined areas, not country or cultures.
@@laara1426 Although the Turks often comprised the bulk of the Mongol army as well as the bulk of armies opposed to the Mongols, throughout the domains of the Mongol Empire there was a diffusion of military technology, which has already bee and also ethnic groups. In addition to the Mongols and Turks, other ethnicities served in the Mongol military machine and found themselves distant from home. May, T.M., 2012. The Mongol conquests in world history, London: Reaktion Books. p.222
The Turkification of Anatolia wasn't elite domination but an actual demographic transition with recorded constant migrations including two major ones, geographies like Egypt & India also got ruled by Turks for centuries but were never Turkified since there was no significant migration to the regions 2,000,000 Turkic migrants settled in Anatolia during the 12th & 13th centuries ~Peter B.Golden 'An introduction to the history of Turkic peoples: Ethnogenesis and state-formation in medieval and Early modern eurasia and the middle east ' 1992 S. 224-225
Let's talk about genocide of Turk by Kuteybe bin Müslim such as Khorosan, Curcan and talkan genocides? History of Tabari / Volume 3/ The most important points and results of the (TÜRKS)Turkish - Arab wars that lasted for 70 years: 1- Over 100,000 Turks were massacred. 2- More than 50,000 Turkish youth were made slaves and concubines. 3- Cities were plundered, everything of the people was plundered as booty. 4- All riches and historical monuments were destroyed, without not care Kids or Womens were killed. 5- In the "Talkan Massacre", one of the biggest massacres in the world, 40,000 Turks were heads cut down and hung in the trees for 24 kilometers. (History is very rare.) 6- In the same way, the heads of 40,000 Turks who were taken prisoner in the Curcan Massacre were heads cut off by the river, the water of the river turned red, and the corpses were still hanging on the trees. 7- The promise "If you surrender, your life will be spared" was never fulfilled, and men and women were put to the sword by saying "Shariah knows no words". 8- The Arabs have gained great wealth from this greatest looting and plunder they have experienced in history. 9- The Turks have never seen such atrocities and atrocities even from the Chinese. After these massacres, the Turks were forcibly converted to the Arab religion and assimilated. These historical facts are hidden with the idea of "not be affected by Islam" and are not mentioned.
Thomas Edward Lawrence CB DSO (16 August 1888 - 19 May 1935) was a British archaeologist, army officer, diplomat, and writer who became renowned for his role in the Arab Revolt (1916-1918) and the Sinai and Palestine Campaign (1915-1918) against the Ottoman Empire during the First World War.
The English general reminded me of a quote by freemason Winston Churchill: " You can never defeat the Turks by fighting, using soldiers and weapons. Capture the clergy of the Turks and use them. They destroy the state! " Winston Churchill
Nizek Tarhan (d. 709, Turkish chief in the Toharistan region. He was killed by beheading on the orders of Kutaybe bin Muslim, the Arab commander who fought against the Turks in the 8th century. Reported from Taberî, Belazuri, Dineverî and İbnü'l-Esir, he writes: "Hajjaj Kutaybe Quteyba then called Nizek to his side and cut his neck. He sent his head to Hajjaj." Kutaybe bin Muslim had hundreds of turks genocided, including the children of Nizek Tarhan, his family and his comrades.
As a Romanian from Southern Romania (Wallachia) do I have any genetic similarity with the Turkish people today considering the fact the the Romanian Principalities were never under the Ottoman Empire?
@ares9473 lmao... there are no NATIVE greek. Greeks assimilated the natives which they call themselves greek now. Greeks did not originate in Anatolia. How could they be NATIVE? You gotta learn what native means.
@@barca8341 Well my friend, i am not an expert on genetics but as far as i know ,greeks are over 64 % anatolian neolithic farmers .We are more anatolians than modern 'turks' .How did we assimilate ourselves ? Btw i saw a dna test by a 'turk' from sevastia 3 years ago .He scored almost 75% greek
@@jimjim3474 you should ask yourself why the average Kosovo Albanian scores more "Greek". Ask yourself, why Greeks are less "Greek" than Albanians. Because it's PELASGIAN DNA named under a nationality 😂 ALBANIANS built Greece while Greeks are at the beach like lazy bums drinking frappe 😂
The leleges were aegean peoples who were indigenous both in aegean anatolia and greek aegean islands, they then were assimilated by the greeks and luwians. They arent anatolians in the indo european sense, they were aegean people, as most greeks generally are. In fact, west anatolia's aegean region most likely was entirely inhabited by ancient aegean peoples first, either other aegean groups along with the leleges or the leleges were various aegean populations that were labelled with one name. It makes sense, the luwians inhabited like half of the anatolian region, they were a big family, they certainly did absorb people. Some even theorize that the luwic carians actually descended from aegean peoples but were luwianized. Although not proven, there certainly was mixing between the leleges and carians.
There mustn't be a better example of a 'moving' ethno-linguistic group than the Turkic peoples. They started out from Eastern Siberia (Mongolia, Altai) and now are main ethnic constituents of various countries, like Turkey, Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan, etc.
Turks weren't from Eastern Siberia. They were living in Southern Siberia in the west rather than in the east. In the East proto-Mongols and proto-Tungus people were living. It's only after the Xiongnu conquered Eastern Siberia they had a contact with these East Eurasian populations.
Let's talk about KUTEYBE BİN MÜSLİM GENOCIDE OF TÜRK It is NOT a REAL TÜRK, WHO FORGETS the HORASAN, CURCAN, TALKAN Massacres! History of Tabari / Volume 3/ The most important points and results of the (TÜRKS)Turkish - Arab wars that lasted for 70 years: 1- Over 100,000 Turks were massacred. 2- More than 50,000 Turkish youth were made slaves and concubines. 3- Cities were plundered, everything of the people was plundered as booty. 4- All riches and historical monuments were destroyed, without not care kids or womens were killed. 5- In the "Talkan Massacre", one of the biggest massacres in the world, 40,000 Turks were heads cut down and hung in the trees for 24 kilometers. (History is very rare.) 6- In the same way, the heads of 40,000 Turks who were taken prisoner in the Curcan Massacre were heads cut off by the river, the water of the river turned red, and the corpses were still hanging on the trees. 7- The promise "If you surrender, your life will be spared" was never fulfilled, and men and women were put to the sword by saying "Shariah knows no words". 8- The Arabs have gained great wealth from this greatest looting and plunder they have experienced in history. 9- The Turks have never seen such atrocities and atrocities even from the Chinese. 10- After these massacres, the Turks were forcibly converted to the Arab religion and assimilated. These historical facts are hidden with the idea of "not be affected by Islam" and are not mentioned.
Thomas Edward Lawrence CB DSO (16 August 1888 - 19 May 1935) was a British archaeologist, army officer, diplomat, and writer who became renowned for his role in the Arab Revolt (1916-1918) and the Sinai and Palestine Campaign (1915-1918) against the Ottoman Empire during the First World War.
Say hello from me george bush gladio to co-chairman of the Greater Middle East Project recep tayyip erdoğan. Mehdi came into get him and really pissed off. I wonder who is going to came pick up with private jet by FBI to Erdoğan.
Nizek Tarhan (d. 709, Turkish chief in the Toharistan region. He was killed by beheading on the orders of Kutaybe bin Muslim, the Arab commander who fought against the Turks in the 8th century. Reported from Taberî, Belazuri, Dineverî and İbnü'l-Esir, he writes: "Hajjaj Kutaybe Quteyba then called Nizek to his side and cut his neck. He sent his head to Hajjaj." Kutaybe bin Muslim had hundreds of turks genocided, including the children of Nizek Tarhan, his family and his comrades.
There is no such thing as aryan clothing. The girl in the picture literally lives in Krygyzstan, north of Iran, so cultures collide and they wear similar clothing.
My fathet is Iraqi Turkmen, and My Mom is Terekeme from Turkiye. I score Very High Caucasian and Gedrosia Dna. Only 10% east asian Ancestry :( Haplogroup j2a2 i think i am an Asimilated one :)))
You have to note that only 51 million people out of 88 million people in turkey are ethnic turks the rest are kurds,arabs,laz,bosniak,albanian etc so its normal for ethnically non turks to have non central asian DNA
There is approximately 87 million people in Turkey approximately 25-30 million is Kurdish so now you have 57-62 million and I assume all the others are about approximately 10-12 million and then you have about approximately 50 million who is the Turkish people
@@teknul89 The number kurds in turkey are 18 million but there are also 4 million bosniaks 3 million albanians 2million muslim greeks , 500 thousand armenians, 4 million circassians , one million gypsies, in turkey so unfortunately not all people in turkey are turkish
@@reconscout2238 that’s what I was trying to say to you too but there are more Kurds, Turkish, Bosnians etc since that has been increased in every groups population in recent years But after the Turks the Kurds are the biggest ethnic group which is about 1/5 of the whole Turkey’s population
Hi, I'm from Trabzon (Trabizond) and my DNA result was all around the world , Rome, Balcan, West and Central Asia, East Asia and Korea-Japan, Mena(middle east and north Africa even Nigeria) so can l have the legitimaticy to form both Turan and Rome , :)
İf you have central asian and japanese and korean you must be a member of Çepni clan of Oğuz's. İn Trabzon province Turkish DNA is nearly 0 except ağsar
It is ignorant to reduce the Turkish DNA to the East Asian component only. The Gokturks had an East Asian component by 25%, while Hun Tianshan only 15%. As for the ancient Turks, they had different components from North Europe, West Eurasia, East Eurasia and Siberia, but the important thing is that not all The Turks of Siberia, Central Asia, and Anatolia are of Turkish origin, so all the Turkish peoples absorbed new peoples, from the Tanguts,Samoyed, Tungus, Mongols, and Anatolians. The ancient Turks were described with Caucasian features, of course, with the exception of the Oghuz, who were always described with East Asian features. The Kyrgyz, Kipchaks, Bulgars, Bashkirs, Mishars, Huns, Cumans, Tiele, and Qarluqs, before mass mixing with the Mongols, were always described with Caucasian features.
If we look at the west eurasian component for Turks then it's always gonna point to the Iranian plateau, Caucasus, Balkans and Anatolia (Hitites, Ludwigs etc). The best way to find out how Oghuz they are genetically is by the east eurasian component
In fact, Turkness stands for a belief system rather than a race. In ancient middle asia steps, the belief of a single divine God who created the sky and the ground and everything on it, was very common among different clans. The laws of that god were named as "Töre". People who followed the "Töre" named as "Török". They named themselves as Török (Türk) because of their belief system, not because of their race. Some Hungarians still stick to this identity and they define themselves as Török. The name "Turku" is very common in Finland as place name. Khazaks and today's Türkiye Turks look quite different but both admit their origins as Turk.
Many Turks are either European, Middle Eastern, Far Eastern or somewhere in between some have Caucusus mixes within there veins and bloods and cells and vessels.
i am also weeired kind of turk. my parents are from kars but my grand grand father fleed from the north somewhere to Turkey when the russians invated. i am not sure from wich part of causcassus. i think my people are called terekeme or karapapak aswell. so there might be a azeri relation but i dont know. i would like to know more about the history of that dna
it has made it a profession to refute the Turkish Official History based on the historical view adopted by Atatürk; There are a number of writers who defend the Giladstonist, Renanist, Hitlerist, Sevrid Indo-Aryan European Official History, which stigmatizes Turks as enemies of civilization. Such writers who call themselves "historians" and make them call themselves "historians"; The theses they attacked by saying "Turkish Official History Thesis" were not actually produced by Atatürk in the 1930s; Between 1800-1876, that is, before Atatürk was born, Fergusson, Rawlinson, Layard, Oppert, Cahun, etc. They either do not know at all, or even hide this fact, that hundreds of such Western knowledge is based on their scientific determinations. Ataturk never interpreted this historical thesis as "Political Expansionism" (Panturanism) and did not apply it as such. With this scientific thesis, Atatürk proved that the Turks, whom the West regarded as barbarians, have a deep-rooted and civilized past within the human family; The West is unscientific. Atatürk responded to "political racist" insults with this scientific thesis, also produced by Western.
I recently took a DNA test, and coming from Hannover in Germany, I expected a mix of French, maybe Polish, Italian and so on. What came back was 80% German, 20% Swedish and 10% Norwegian. I am slightly confused that Swedish and Norwegian DNA would be classed as separate entities! By the way, I am using my partner's account, which is why I look Chinese. ;)
I'm still unconvinced why German, Swedish, and Norwegian can be different entities. Germanic people migrated into Scandinavia in ancient times. So how can these genetics tests pinpoint the wave of migration unless there was clear genetic mutation. For instance, Normans (Norseman) were French-speaking Vikings from Scandinavia who mixed with indigenous Celtic and Franks. Vikings from Dane-law era were Old Norse speaking Germanic people from Denmark. Anglo, Saxons, Frisians...were Germanic-speaking tribes from coastal Germany and Netherlands. As such, have no idea how a genetic test can different these people.
Proposals for the homeland of the Turkic peoples and their language are far-ranging, from the Transcaspian steppe to Northeastern Asia (Manchuria).[2] Peter Benjamin Golden listed Proto-Turkic lexical items about the climate, topography, flora, fauna, people's modes of subsistence in the hypothetical Proto-Turkic Urheimat and proposed that the Proto-Turkic Urheimat was located at the southern, taiga-steppe zone of the Sayan-Altay region.[3] According to Yunusbayev et al. (2015), genetic evidence points to an origin in the region near South Siberia and Mongolia as the "Inner Asian Homeland" of the Turkic ethnicity.[4] Similarly several linguists, including Juha Janhunen, Roger Blench and Matthew Spriggs, suggest that Mongolia is the homeland of the early Turkic language.[5]
The origins of the Turkic peoples has been a topic of much discussion.[107][108] Peter Benjamin Golden listed Proto-Turkic lexical items about the climate, topography, flora, fauna, people's modes of subsistence in the hypothetical Proto-Turkic Urheimat and proposed that the Proto-Turkic Urheimat was located at the southern Altai-Sayan region in Siberia.[109] A possible genealogical link of the Turkic languages to Mongolic and Tungusic languages, specifically a hypothetical homeland in Manchuria, such as proposed in the Transeurasian hypothesis, by Martine Robbeets, has received support but also criticism, with opponents attributing similarities to long-term contact.[110][111][112] Linguistic and genetic evidence strongly suggest an early presence of Turkic peoples in Mongolia.[113][107][114][115] The proto-Turkic-speakers may have been linked to Neolithic East Asian agricultural societies in Northeastern China, which is to be associated with the Xinglongwa culture and the succeeding Hongshan culture, based on varying degrees of specific Northeast Asian genetic substratum among modern Turkic speakers.[116][117][114] The East Asian agricultural roots of the Proto-Turkic language have been corroborated in multiple recent studies. According to historians, "the Proto-Turkic subsistence strategy included an agricultural component, a tradition that ultimately went back to the origin of millet agriculture in Northeast China".[116][117][114] Around 2,200 BC, the agricultural ancestors of the Turkic peoples probably migrated westwards into Mongolia, where they adopted a pastoral lifestyle, in part borrowed from Iranian peoples. Given nomadic peoples such as Xiongnu, Rouran and Xianbei share underlying genetic ancestry "that falls into or close to the northeast Asian gene pool", the proto-Turkic language likely originated in northeastern Asia.[118]
Sen yine mi aktive edildin ey trol? Türkçe videoların altında şeriatçı kisvesine bürünüp Atatürk'e ve cumhuriyet değerlerine söv, milleti birbirine kırdırmaya çalış, sonra da gelip böyle videoların altında tarihçi/antropolog havalarına gir. Kim tutuyor senin tasmanı?
@@wftvtfrctyhrtd In recent years, the origin of the Turkish language and people has been a topic of much debate among linguists and anthropologists and different theories have been proposed.. A recent study by a group of linguists has proposed that the proto-Turks, the ancient ancestors of the Turkish people, were initially an agricultural society, and that their original homeland, or urheimat, was located in Manchuria. According to this theory, Manchuria is the only suitable place for the urheimat of the proto-Turks because it has the right combination of geographic landscape and animal and plant life to support an agricultural society. This theory also claims that proto-Turks were 100% East Asian. However, not all scholars agree with this theory. Some have pointed out that when comparing the languages that originated in Manchuria, such as Korean, Japanese, Mongolian, Tungusic, with Turkish, Turkish lacks the substantial amount of Chinese words found in the other languages. Furthermore, the vocabulary related to agriculture does not match up with that of the other languages. Instead, these scholars argue that the agricultural terms that are common among the Turkish-speaking people across a wide geographic area are more similar to those of West Eurasian and Mesopotamian populations, such as Sumerians, as well as the Hungarians and Ancient Greek. This, they argue, suggests that the urheimat of the proto-Turks was located in a different region than Manchuria. It is therefore very likely that the proto-Turks followed a different route of migration than the East Asian populations, and it is possible that they met in the region known as Mongolia today and most likely the route they followed instead was through Mesopotomatia and Anatolia to southern Urals and then they reached Southern Siberia where they emerged as a distinct ethnic group. In conclusion, the debate over the origin of the Turkish language and people is ongoing and different theories have been proposed. However, the claim of Manchurian origin of (proto) Turkish language and thus their being 100 percent East Eurasian people is very flimsy. All the genetic and linguistic evidence available suggests that proto-Turks had West Eurasian roots. Hence it’s a very viable idea that that they followed a different route than the East Eurasian populations albeit they met in the lands called Mongolia today.
Thomas Edward Lawrence CB DSO (16 August 1888 - 19 May 1935) was a British archaeologist, army officer, diplomat, and writer who became renowned for his role in the Arab Revolt (1916-1918) and the Sinai and Palestine Campaign (1915-1918) against the Ottoman Empire during the First World War.
Mr. Okan Guncu, are you saying that there never was a Byzantine Empire? Alexander spread the Hellenic language as far as Bactria. The Greeks who converted to Islam are now considered Turks but their DNA has not changed.
Modern Turkish people of Turkey are actually Byzantine Greeks in the west, Armenians, Kurdish in east, Arabs in south, who all these they change identity to Turkic because of Ottoman empire
@@papazataklaattiranimam Not actually. Anatolia has never been Greek. It has been linguistically Hellenized due to Christianization. Kurds are recent wave of migration. Their existence in Anatolia date back to 1500s. They came even after Turks.
if timur didnt destroyed golden horde, there wouldnt be any rus or slavic state now. (both timur and golden horde is turkic btw, turks always fought each other. couldnt imagine if they were united. even in mongol empire chengis khan times not all turks united.)
@@imnottalkingtoanatolianzombies You will find history did not start with the modern english language, go back 2 to 3 hundred years & you wouldn't understand it while old & modern Slavonic languages have a direct link to Sanskrit that can still be understood, that would make you incorrect, Ïзучи ïcторïю балабол пустословний, а тогда можно на приму потолковати 👍😉😊😂
@@viktormogilin307 No janissary is a eunuch. There has never been such a practice. Janissaries are forbidden to marry until the age of 40, if they want to retire when they reach the age of 40 and start a life for themselves, or make a career and embellish their life as a higher-ranking commander, even if they choose to pursue a career, they have the right to marry.
My ancestors are from the Kayı tribe of the Oghuz, who migrated starting from 1071 and remained in small villages (Eskisehir) in Central Anatolia until 1950, isolated from the outside world, very small village surrounded my hills&mountains ... My grandfather passed away at the age of 96. They were settled there by the Seljuks during their time, and they never left that place. He told the stories of Central Asia and the times they migrated have been passed down from generation to generation. he told me when i was 10 years old, ''we were nomads and come this land via seljuks, tell our stories to next generation like those before us'' . The entire village is related to each other and resembles Central Asians in terms of appearance...I checked old ottoman registry, my grandpa was right about past and genetic roots. I live in Istanbul right now, people constantly asking ''are you korean/ tatar/uzbek/turkmen'' ? due to my asian eyes :)
You are the original Turk
@@عليياسر-ذ5ب There doesn't exist a concept like original Turk from biological sense. All haplogroups exist from much earlier times than any known ethnic groups in the world. No genes are patented and licensed to one particular ethnic group. There is no Greek or Turkish or Persian DNA. Turks just like the rest of ethnic groups in the world have very diverse biological ancestries from both maternal and paternal sides since they appeared as a distinct ethnic group in history.
@@Alprtngakrc No, the original Turks look like this man, but you are Iranians, Kurds, Greeks, Romans, Georgians, Armenians, and a small minority that is almost a lender. They are the original Turks.
@@عليياسر-ذ5ب There doesn't exist any original Turks. Even the first time they appeared a disticnt ethnic group they had This is scientifically established fact. Today many of the Iranians are the Turks assimilated by Persian speaking people who originally came from India. Those BMAC people are forcefully assimilated by Aryan invaders coming from India. Those people weren't originally Persian speaking people. Their culture an civilization was completely wiped off by the Indians speaking Vedic language.
Linguistically speaking there is no real evidence regarding Indo-European roots of Iranic people. The language of Avesta in Iranic people and the language of Veda in Indian people are very similar to each other and Veda thousands of year older than Avesta.. Most probably what happened was these Indo-Aryan people coming from India conquered the remnants of Sintashta people who didn’t move to east and north after subjugating BMAC people and imposed their language on them. From there this language was imposed on the populations in Europe who had much less crowded populations back then and that’s how Indo-European languages emerged.
@@Alprtngakrc Aryans and modern Europeans lived in Mongolia, Siberia and Central Asia
... I visited Türkiye last year and I'm fascinated with all I saw, the people, the food, the architecture, the language ( I even started studying Turkish ... it's so difficult though ... ), the geography ... etc ... I can say that I felt safe and welcome ... Istanbul is a jewel ... I want to go again. I had been in Ephesus, Izmir, Kusadasi ... beautiful places and a lot of history ... Greetings from Miami ... !!!
A lot of story,but not turkish story.
More ancient that a mongol turkish people come in those territory
@@albalb6409 ... jealous ... ??? ... are you jealous ... ??? ... of course you are ... !!! ... and you have a reason ... !!! ... Türkiye is awesome ... !!!
😂Costume of the Asiatics : Pants
The only people you would see wearing pants were the ‘barbarians,’ and pants didn't get invented until men tamed the HORSE.
Sometimes these pantaloons were made of the skins of animals ; at others of rich and fine tissues embroidered or painted in sprigs, spots, stripes, cheques, zig-zags, lozenges, or other ornaments. Sometimes they fit tight, at others they hang loose and fall in large wrinkles over the shoes.
The Classical Greek did not even have a word for ‘trousers.’
'Barbarian' meaning was :non-greek speaking.
Not a single Greek, Latin (Roman), Byzantine, Arab, or Persian author ever claimed that the Scythians spoke Persian (Iranian) language, although many of these writers have stressed the finest details of their everyday life, culture, beliefs, customs, and habits.
Especially important is the fact that Herodotus, whose information is routinely used by the Scythologists, was a native of the Asia Minor city of Halicarnassus, in one of the ancient Persian satrapies, he could not fail to distinguish the Persian (Iranian) vernaculars from the others, especially since he visited Persia and not once met Iranians outside of Persia.
However, Herodotus never says anywhere that the language of the Scythians was Persian or Persian-like. He writes that the Scythians and Sauromates are related tribes, close in way of life and language, but cites very little information on their language, but even that limited information, as we shall see below, confirms the paradigm about the Türkic-linguality of the Scythians."
Scythians, Balkars, and Ossetians
K.Laipanov, I.Miziev
Origin of the Türkic peoples
@kikap2242 the Greece that you imaging has been died very long time ago.the majority and even I can say almost all of them(Greek people) are gypsy people now.
That is sure that Turkish are very genetically diversified, because I am originally from Trabzon and our ancestors came from Crimea Ukraine. This means that we have mixed with all a lot of people.
@Arif anddd tatars are Turkish
Türklerin hepsinin çok çeşitli olduğunu düşünmüyorum.
i am also one of those from mother side (my mother is from trabzon as well) , on father side all migrated from ottoman bulgaria to sakarya. so yeah when people ask "i basically am from the black sea area" i say :D
@@altanata5060 😹😹same here
@@dronur6194 orta Asya'da kalanlar hariç çok çeşitli
Mehmet Oz,MD, is a popular American doctor and television personality. His DNA test showed him to be Ashkenazi Jewish. I think the truth is that Ashkenazi Jews, like myself, have a lot of Turkish blood. In the year 740, a group of Turks converted, the Khazars, became Jewish. Centuries later, they migrated into Poland.
Whoops, there's an awkward sentence in my post.
Probably. For example, Ukrainian president Zelenskiy is Jewish. Khazars settled at today's Ukrainian land for 3 centuries. If Zelenskiy walks on the streets here at Turkey nobody will think he is a foreigner. He looks like an ordinary Turkish guy...
@@fodepar Mongols what for god's sake
Dr. Oz is also said to have Circassian ancestry on his mother's side.
@@AdultThirdCultureKid1971 Circassian. I like that. Thanks.
The thing with Anatolia is that its local peoples never really went anywhere. From Hittite Empire to Persian, then Greek colonization to Roman times, locals adopted the culture of whomever in charge over time and mixed. Considering that the incoming Turks were in effect a minority since Anatolia has always been a highly populated region due to its capability to support living with farming, fishing, water sources and such, the current DNA composition isn't that surprising. It's kind of like what happened with Britons followed by Romans, then Angles, Saxons and Normans in England.
Anatolia wasn't a highly populated land when Seljuks seized the control there. Its populatian was widely reduced due to plague of Justinian which hit Anatolia multiple times from 541 CE to 750CE and it's thought to wiped off some 75 percent of Anatolian population. Moreover continous wars with Sassanids, Arabs, Seljuks as well as the expeditions of crusaders not to mention the several civil unrests dwindled the population furthermore and forced the bulk of the population to move the coasts on the fringes of Anatolia.
Those Anatolian populations and Turks were living in totally different geographical locations except a few cities. Turks were living in the interior parts of Anatolia while the native populations were living coastal cities behind the castles and they had very little interactions with each other.
Turks were definitely not a little minority in Anatolia and many of the Turkish tribes escaping from Chingiz Khan's invasion of Central Asia came and settled in Anadolia in the 13th century. According to the European traveler Marco Polo who went to Anatolia in the 13 century Turkmens had already the overall majority in the entire Anatolia as early 13th century. In Marco Polo's map Central Asia was called "Great Turkey" and Anatolia was called "Turcomania" (Turkmens' land).
@@Alprtngakrcnny how the genetics of modern Turks is closer indigenous Anatolians than the conquerors. Which makes them assmilated Greeks, Armenians, Assyrians, Iranians , Balkans
@@matrixxx3662 Just read my comments below. I answered these types of question you asked now.
@@Alprtngakrc Thats a theory you have not at all based on genetics.
@@matrixxx3662 Yes it's based on genetics. I just can't post the link here because then the post will disappear. But it's definitely based on genetics. It's more than this. It's an established based on all the genetic samples available regarding Turks.
As a Uzbek, when I visit Turkey, I don’t face any difficulties in understanding Turkish people, of course there are some differences in pronunciation but I can get by
Don't worry, Tengri hear all your voices that's why send Tengri Kut for Turk enemies to destroyed all around 4 continent lands was owned by Bilge Kağan.
Bilindiği üzere Stalin rejimi Türklük ve Turancılık fikrine ve Türk coğrafyalarının bir çatı altında toplanmasına müsaade etmedi. Bu davaya yakın olan bütün aydınları, dini ve milli liderleri toplu olarak katletti. Bütün katliamlar 1936-1945 yılları arasında farklı zamanlarda değişik Türk cumhuriyetlerinde uyguladı. Bu hadiselerin baş aktörlüğünü Stalin adına NKVD, daha sonra da KGB istihbarat servisleri yaptı.
Bunlardan biri de 1993 yılına kadar saklanabilen ve Kırgızistan’ın başşehri Bişkek yakınlarında bulunan “Ata- Beyt” toplu mezarıdır. 138 kişiye ait bu mezarda kurşuna dizilerek öldürülenlerin çoğu Kırgız Türkleri olup; aralarında Uygur, Tatar, Kazar’da vardı. Bunların arasında Türk dünyasının meşhur yazarlarından Cengiz Aytmatov’un babası Törekul’da vardı. Katliam, Bişkek şehrinin yaklaşık 30 km dışında bulunan Ala Dağların eteğindeki bir tuğla ocağında gerçekleştirildi.
1938’deki bu katliamın bir de şahidi vardı. Tuğla ocağı bekçisi Hıdır Aliyev... Aliyev, saklandığı yerden inleyerek can verenlerin çığlıklarını duydu. Ölmeden önce, bugün Issık Gölü’nde yaşayan 80 yaşındaki kızına şunları söyledi: “Kızım! Kireç ocağında çok büyük bir katliam yapıldı. Şimdi bunu kimseye söylemezsin. Zaman ve zemin uygun olunca bunu herkes bilmeli” diye vasiyet etti.
Bu hadiseyi, Kırgızistan Cumhuriyeti 1991 yılında tam hürriyetine kavuşuncaya kadar kimse öğrenmedi. Kırgızistan 1991’de Sovyetlerinden ayrılıp hür cumhuriyet kurulunca, katliam hükümete bildirildi. Kırgızistan’ın ilk Cumhurbaşkanı Askar Akayev bu duruma bizzat el koyarak 1993’de kazı başlatılması için gerekli kararı çıkardı.
Seljuks were %35-%40 Asian and were between Uzbeks and Turkmens autosomally. They didn't look like some Han Chinese. All Turkics are Eurasians. A mix of West and East Eurasian. Modern Turks have %7-%22 east Eurasian ancestry. Thus modern TURKS ARE %20-%45 Seljuk. If you don't know anyting about genetics it's not my fault. Also our non Turkic part is not a monolith either. Modern Anatolian Turks have only %35 ANF ancestry. Hittites had %60+. So no we are not same people with ancient Anatolians at all. A simple calculation of Turkish west Between Medieval samples in Vahaduo;
Target: Turkish(West)
Distance: 0.6720% / 0.00672047
31.2 KAZ_Kipchak
30.2 Anatolia_Center_Phrygian_650BC
16.4 Paleo-Balkan+Slavic_MNE_Doclea_Bjelovine
9.2 Caucasus_BlackSea_Samsun_B_150BC
8.0 IRN_Hasanlu_IA
5.0 Levant_Sidon_1800BC
You see kurds or syrian immigrants, bro
maşallah bize :)
@@yeterhalatci9705 kurds are not immigrants. they are iranian people who have lived in that area since forever. besides that, the dna of a turk and kurd living in the same area shouldnt be far off. azeris for example have about 80 to 90 percent iranian dna and maybe 5 percent. as we have seen in this video, turks from turkey are maybe 5 percent turkish. the rest is a mixture of greek, italian, iranian and other caucasus people.
My grandfather was from Tuva, Russia. He had light blue eyes. Through Google research, l have found out -just a few months ago-that l am without any doubt Turkic, although l do look Mongolian or Chinese.
Ne mutlu Türküm diyene
Welcome to family.
@@herneyse11 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Real Turks are Northeast Asian. Rus/Slavs generally killed men when they invaded.
my grandfather has iceblue eyes, one of my aunt and my dad is little dark skin like me, biggest aunt is look like russian blonde and blue eyes, my brother look like tatar my sister is cotton white skin with green eyes ,my nephew is blonde and blue eyes, we mixed
The famous Turkish thinker and scholar Hoca Ahmed Yesevi has a saying: Turkishness is destiny, religion is a choice.
What I want to say is that Turkish is a race and it contains many different religious beliefs, can you imagine it from the Siberian steppes to Central Asia, from the Balkans to the Danube river, from the Ural mountains to the Finnish steppes?
We can give a few examples of this: Gökoğuz (Gagauz) Turks or Sekel Turks living in Moldova or the regions of Romania close to the Hungarian border The Sekel Turks or Cuman Kipchak Turks in Hungary are Christian Orthodox or Christian Catholic.
Turks in the Balkans generally adopted the Anatolian Bektashi tradition.
Various Hungarian Turcologists stated that Hungarian is of Finno-Ugric in terms of linguistics and of Turkic origin in terms of genetics. Sami Group in Finland One of them is not to mention the Finnish Tatars: ) they already belong to the kuman-kipchak branch of Turkishness.
Let's come to the Khazars, Karaites and Karaims Turkish Group. These groups are generally accepted as Jewish Karaim, Caspian and Karaite Turks living in Poland, Ukraine and Lithuania in the mountainous regions of Azerbaijan and Khazars of Karachays.
The Turks living in the Altai Khakasya and Yakut, istan regions, which are considered to be the homeland of the Turks living in the Siberian region of Russia, generally continue to believe in Tengrizim (Shamanism), which is the first belief of the Turks.
As a note, Greetings and Love from Turkey to everyone reading this article. Thank you for this video you made.
Wow men
there is no source that Hoca Ahmet Yesevi sayed that. its an internet illnes.
Tell that to the Christian people who concreted how free... choice they had...
Nationalist post from a Turk. Typical. Turkish is not a race… 🥱
I did a bit of an extended research into this, since there is very little information available on the surface. The reason it's so hard to pinpoint the exact ancestors of the Turks, is because there isn't a single ancestor, we are a mixed people. Most historians agree that the Ashina clan is definitely at least one ancestor of the Turks. The Ashina were a nomadic people from today's China. They lived around modern Pingliang. Ashina was first attested to in the year 439, as reported by the Book of Sui: on the 18th day of the 10th month, the Tuoba ruler Emperor Taiwu of Northern Wei overthrew Juqu Mujian of Northern Liang in eastern Gansu, and 500 Ashina families fled northwest to the Rouran Khaganate near Gaochang (Bayingolin area today). Here they encountered the Tocharians (who lived in Tarim Basin) and joined the Goache (göçebe) Turkic tribes that were migrating from the North West, Altai region (they originally came from around Crimea and were probably related to the Schytians. They lived between the Black Sea and the Altai mountains and were migrating east). Ashina mixed with the Goache tribes, and then for an unknown reason (possibly through a defeat and subjugation as was common) joined the Rouran Khanate. Rouran was a more mixed tribe made of many ethnic minorities like the Xianbei (ancestors of Mongols) and Tungusic people. This brings us to the Xianbei, which is another part of the Turkic ancestry. Xianbei were nomadic people from the North East, from Korea and Siberia regions, one of the most notable Xianbei federation is the Tungusic people. So, Xianbei came from the North East, Goache came from the Nort West, and the Ashina came from the South, around the area between Tarim Basin and Ordos Plateau is where all these different people met and mingled with each other. They mixed with each other, and at one point, the Ashina overthrew the Rouran dynasty and founded the Gokturk Empire. It's important to know that there were other Gokturk tribes and confederations that coexisted with the Gokturks, and were usually crushed by the Ashina. The Oghuz was one such confederation, they were later broken up and incorporated into the Gokturks. So, although Ashina's Gokturk empire might be the first one recorded in history thanks to the Northern Wei documents (who were a Xianbei dynasty themselves) they weren't the only ones or probably even the first ones. Ashina was just one tribe, but the Goache, and Xianbei, were a whole confederacy made of many people, and when they all mixed with the Xiongnu, Xianbei, Tocharians, Goache, etc, there were dozens and dozens of Turkic tribes and confederations small and large. We didn't even touch the other confederacies such as the Dingling which were a Turkic confederacy of horse cart nomads that is believed to have travelled more from South West maybe from around Iran or India to China. We just happen to know more about the most famous one because that's the main one we have written evidence of primarily.
Turks don't have anything to do with Chinese. At least from 700CE they were forbidden to mix with them. Turks originate from Caucasus and Volga/Ural region. They expanded out of that area to the east to Altays, and to the West.
@@almazchati4178😂😂😂😂
You reflected your own sincerity with the photo you chose as your cover photo.
I recently discovered an ant colony in my back yard. I was watching hundreds of ants coming and going from the same hole in the ground. I couldn't tell the difference between one or the other. If a superior race of beings visited the earth I suspect they would hover over us and think to themselves "Hmmm, look at all of those ants."
Fire ants are the superior race
@@AryanKhnna : Ha Ha - I stand corrected.
My ancestry on my father's side, as far as I know, is North and West African, possibly Arabian Peninsula, the Caucasus and Central Asia.
0:27 This ancient Turks facial reconstruction is accurate, at least for their ruling class. recently, The first genetic analysis on the Empress Ashina in 2023 by Xiaoming Yang et al. found nearly exclusively Northeast Asian ancestry (97,7%) next to minor West-Eurasian components (2,7%). The ancient Türkic royal family of the Göktürk Khaganate was found to share genetic affinities to post-Iron Age Tungusic and Mongolic pastoralists, while having heterogeneous relationships towards various Turkic-speaking groups, suggesting genetic heterogeneity and multiple sources of origin for the population of the Turkic Khaganate. According to the authors, these findings "once again validates a cultural diffusion model over a demic diffusion model for the spread of Turkic languages" and refutes "the western Eurasian origin and multiple origin hypotheses" in favor of an East Asian origin for the Türks.[4]
Many Mongolian tribes are originally of Turkic origin, thus western Mongolics have around 35-40% Turkic blood. However, I don't know how much Turkic blood the Tungusic peoples have.
@@papazataklaattiranimam none of Mongolian were turkish abdools
@Qazaq_Qijatno way man, anatolian Turks are not greek. There are some but definitely not all of them.
Empress Ashina doesn't have Y-DNA as she is female. In females you cannot say anything about the genetic heritage without getting the samples of male relatives of her paternal side just by looking their autosomal genes. This DNA results don't match any of the DNA samples with the rest of Kok Turk samples. Besides Mukhan Kagan who was the father of Empress Ashina is always mentioned as red haired lapice blue eyes. Obviously either Empress Ashina was just an adopted daughter of Mukhan Kagan or simply the reading of her autosomal genes is inaccurate.
@Qazaq_Qijat 👍👍👍
When I look at the faces of Turks, I see very wide cheekbones and a straight head. a purely asian trait. But there is no such thing in Greeks, Armenians, Persians. I think we are a mixture of Anatolian and Turks.
Yes 100% Anatolian Greeks 😂
@@mikem8211Sen nesin!?
@@mikem8211you’re 100% karamanid Turks😂😂
dafuuq is a straight head
We Anatolians are aware of our genetic diversity. We are honored by this., we know everything. What some Armenians and Greeks dont want to understand is Your language and your culture is a thing and your DNA is a different thing because the DNA It is very open to environmental influences and that not explain what your culture or language. Being a nation is not about genes, it is about will and ideas. We are interested in glorifying One Anatolia instead of calling our homeland anatolia's part like Greeater Kurdistan, Greeater Armenia, Greeater Greece or Pontus. You have different narratives that break it up into pieces. We anatolians have not yet assimilated enough to think that we need to divide our homeland into pieces. For us Anatolia is first. that's why we are clearly very different. Because here is our motherland. It is not the genes that make up great nations. It is their struggle together. never forget this.
The concept of Turkish nation is not based on a race, origin or racism, but on the concept of "Turkish Citizenship" and the principle of "Equality", framed by Articles 66 and 10 of the Constitution.
According to the provision of Article 66/1 of the Constitution, the Turkish nation does not refer to a race but to all citizens in this country and is a concept that embraces all people living on these lands. The concept of Turkishness is not an ethnic and biological concept, but a sociological and cultural one. It does not express belonging to race, but to the country and the Turkish Nation.
Like Brazilian nation, Australian, Canadian or American nation. You know what I'm saying? For us Turk means our unite not like an origin. it is a cultural consept. just like how you feel when you hear irish, germans, british or africans living in America says that ''I'm an American first''. and same expression here, When we say we are Turkish nation and this is our unite idea, it does not mean that we reject our roots. when all ottoman ethnics living in anatolia says that I'm a part of Turkish nation first, this is same idea as being American nation first. they want to express their unity. To fail to understand this, one must persist in bad faith or devalue the law of existence of one's own country. one day the world will understand us more clear, respect our struggle for unity and will stop developing distorted interpretations of history about us that caused major world wars. We are peaceful people and our unity must be respected. Turkish nation with its people in both east and west are the only people in the world who carry Anatolian spesific pool genes at the highest rate. So in accordance with the laws you are subject in your country; Please respect their right to exist as a nation and their ideas. Anatolia means "Land of Mothers" in Turkish. Here is our motherland. Respect our will for peace!
Yes but 90% of nationalist idiots don't understand that and believe that they're the direct descendants of Alparslan and 100% Turkic. Even though they have round eyes and are dark skinned or blonde with blue eyes.
I am from Paphlagonia region in the Western Black Sea Region. Civilizations such as Palaic, Bithynians, Paphlagons, Hittites, Lydians and Phrygians ruled here. Later, the Turks came and added sauce to this soup. Therefore, as Turks researching our past, we know that we are the descendants of a mixture of all these peoples.
Im also Paphlagonian (from Amasra / Cakraz village) but im half Abkhazian and half Turkish
@@onur6557 Abkhazians are not Paphlagonians. Your Abkhazian roots probably come from those who took refuge in the Ottoman Empire after the Russian invasion of the Caucasus.
@@turkcukayi Yes I am aware of that I expressed myself wrong I am half-Paphlagonian :) My Abkhazian ancestors came from Gagra in 1878 first to Karadeniz Eregli and then to Amasra.
@@onur6557 I did not know that there was an Abkhazian migration to the Western Black Sea. I thought more Circassians were coming. The genocidal Russians exiled all the peoples of the Caucasus to Anatolia.
The clossest related group to Phyrgians ans Lydians are anatolian Greeks, same goes for Hitties but Turks are also close related to Hitties.
I myself am from Trabzon our geographical location is very mountainous which leads to very isolated communities, which means that every village could have a vastly different genetic admixture. Including the fact that villagers rarely married outside of their village.
Are you Pontic?
Yeah my family is from around there too. When you think the generic Trabzonian, you think a person who speaks in an accent that's derived from Mufti accent. With Greek tonalities and such
But mine are from Dulkadir migrations, strictly Turkic accents that has nothing to do with Trabzon or North Eastern Anatolian
Trabzon's people are strictly sunni muslim, but mine is alevi with a ton of shamanistic faiths and beliefs etc.
And these people are supposed to be from the same province.
*Bilim: İnsanlığın Atası TÜRK..*
lütfen resmimi açın
@@bitter_truth8646 I think you meant if I was Pontic Greek / Roman. To answer your question, No I’m not.
@@bitter_truth8646 I am also from there, there were Pontus people there, but everyone there proudly says they are Turkish, including me. We have Greek speaking relatives. this is a very interesting but beautiful thing
Thanks for this video.
i am a Real Anatolian Turkish and have Q1b1 yDNA, native american gernes, beringian genes, polynesian genes, austrilian aborgin genes, inuit genes, %2.6 japan and korean too. But mostly caucasus hunter gatherers, european hunter gatherers, and native Anatolian farmer genes.
@@grrrbrrr9053 Native americans are either turkic or was neighbour with turkic people. DNA examples and culture traditions dresses explain these.
Which website did you use for DNA? I would like to test my DNA
@@imnottalkingtoanatolianzombies they’re not Turkic but related. Basically East Asian/Siberian.
Native Americans came from East Asian/Siberian regions so it’s not surprising he has that genes
@@whitepouch0904 Native Americans have hook noses and robust headshapes with only few Asian features. East Asian/Siberian are flat face people, how can they be the same? Maybe the Inuits, Eskimo are.
The number of nomads of Turkic origin that migrated to Anatolia is a matter of discussion. According to Ibn Sa'id al-Maghribi, there were 200,000 Turkmen tents in Denizli and its surrounding areas, 30,000 in Bolu and its surrounding areas, and 100,000 in Kastamonu and its surrounding areas.[25][26]According to a Latin source, at the end of the 12th century, there were 100,000 nomadic tents in the regions of Denizli and Isparta.[27]
According to Ottoman tax archives, in modern-day Anatolia, in the provinces of Anatolia, Karaman, Dulkadir and Rûm, there were about 872,610 households in the 1520s and 1530s; 160,564 of those households were nomadic, and the remainder were sedentary. Of the four provinces, Anatolia (which does not include the whole of geographic Anatolia but only its western and some of its northwestern parts) had the largest nomadic population with 77,268 households. Between 1570 and 1580, 220,217 households of the overall 1,360,474 households in the four provinces were nomadic, which means that at least 20% of Anatolia was still nomadic in the 16th century. The province of Anatolia, which had the largest nomadic population with 77,268 households, saw an increase of its nomadic population to 116,219 households in those years.[28]
Ya kardeşim her yerdesin ya HER YERDE. Nerede Türkler ile ilgili yabancı bir video görsem yorumlarda sen varsın.
@@sucveceza156doktor kendi haline bırakın dedi
@@sucveceza156harbi ha 😂
@@sucveceza156hes a troll with like 100 accounts
Can you really rely on these numbers from 500 years ago?
It seems too accurate for its time.
I heard one citizen of Turkiye did his own genetic test and found out he is 90 percent Greek. He became so depressed and committed suicide.
Are citizens of today's Turkiye that brainwashed and chauvinist?
I hope that story of Suicide is a lie.
.. California.
O’zbek turkiy qardoshlardan hammaga salomlar🇺🇿
My family are Turkmen from birecik urfa, and according to the great professor Ilber ortayli the oldest form of Turkish spoken in turkey is in birecik urfa.
Is it true the Turkish you guys speak from Urfa is similar to the Syrian and maybe Iraqi Turkmen Turkish too ?
@@teknul89 My family is from the Barak tribe in Gaziantep, which lies directly on the Syrian border. I know that our tribe used to live in Nevsehir but were exiled into the Syrian desert and various parts of the Ottoman Empire (even Bosnians with the surname Barakovic can trace their ancestry to us.) But back to your original question, there is a dialect continuum between the Antep dialects and the Türkmen dialects in Aleppo/Halep. The Türkmen spoken in Iraq is more of a transitionary dialect between the Turkish spoken in Turkey and the Azeri dialects in Iran.
@@hakanozaslan9571Yes but all those Turk from Iraq and Syria came from Turkey before
when there was Ottoman Empire, Seljuk empire and Mamluk time but was sent to Syria and Iraq for expanding their Territories
Both people do not identify themselves as being Turkmen from Turkmenistan even though the real Turks from Turkey came from Turkmenistan but the Turks from Syria and Iraq they should have went back to Turkey where their culture is more alike
That’s interesting because your Tribe Barak seems to have come from Khorasan before they came to Gaziantep which they left in year about 1382-1383 they were part of the tribe of Uzun Hasan he was the leader of Aq Qoyunlu (White Sheeps) this tribe it used to be Alevi until Uzun Hasan death Feriz Bey became their leader he was also called Firuz or Fürüz bey he was a Sunni and converted this tribe to Sunni Muslims
and 4 thousand Abdal tents led by Ashik Dedemoğlu migrated to the vicinity of Yozgat in Anatolia.
The tribe had problems with Ottoman Empire so they sensed them to Şanlıurfa, Akçakale in the most southern place in Şanlıurfa province
Feriz Bey proposed a return to the land of Ajam and Turkestan, with the unanimous support of the tribe's elders. together with Ashik Dedemoğlu, he traveled to Iran to negotiate a migration with the Shah, who accepted the proposal.
But the ottomans were trying to tax the tribe and Baraks they fought ottoman and was mad at them for what they did to them
I never knew the Turkish Soup Ezogelin it came from your tribe it taste good 😊
I don’t know about the Bosnians about that I don’t think it has anything to do with Barak tribe must have been a coincidence because if you look at famous people who has that last name they have that and they are not from Turkey even some Croatians have this last name too
This is very interesting, how much are your dna testing services sir?
Did you make this video on your phone? If you did that might explain why the visuals cut out 10 seconds in, so don't use your phone to make videos they always get scrambled, I notice it a lot in UA-cam shorts.
Who cares what you are just be human love is all we need. The world is my country and the people in it are all my brothers and sisters. And all living beings including all nature we are all one . Peace ✌️.
By the way I am Turk .😊❤
Mate, you look very Romanian. You look like my cousin LOL definitely a lot of mixing. People from the Middle East all think I am part of their people and they are surprised when I tell them I am Romanian. A pleasant surprise on their part, for some reason people just find Romanians very likable. I choose my words and my actions very carefully, only because there are so few Romanians around the world that I consider myself a kind of Ambassador for Romanians. I'm good at everything I do only because I don't want to let down my ancestors so I always strive to be the best
He's Iranian
My maternal grandmother is Romanian, my maternal grandfather is Crimean Tatar, my father is a Syrian Arab…
There's very middle eastern looking Europeans and very European looking middle easterners. It isn't so much because of mixing but rather both regions aren't so racially (phenotypically) distinct from one another. Your average Roman and Dacian ancestor may not look like scandanavians key word being on average, and may pass for an Iranian and whatnot
Ethnic Romanians are slavic in DNA and if you look Middle Eastern, chances are you've mixed with Romani or Turkish
@@none2912Ethnic romanians never been slavic
Yeah. Turks are basically a hybrid of East Asian and those from the Caucasus. Basically, it's what someone would look like if a German and Chinese had a kid.
More like a mongol and a greek had a kid
So basically Germanic people ancestry are from Turkic and Turkish origins?
not at all. people from turkey have around 5% turkish dna. the rest is italian, greek, iranian and caucasian. the hybrid you are talking about are like people from tajikestan and many hazaras from afghanistan who got mixed.
@@BubbleGumFae Germans have some Finnish mixtures and the proto Finns are Uralics that carry similiar dna with Altaics. Eurocentrists are going to deny.
@@azamat19 what the actual f*ck are you talking about? Turks are perfectly Turkish. The Turkish ethnicity was born in Turkey, not Central Asia.
This clearly means that nationalism is often wrongly correlated ethnicity when it has more to do with culture assimilation. This true for Turkiye as well as historical Turkic states such as Golden Horde & Chaghtai Khanate whose rulers were ethnic Mongols but assimilated in the culture and religion of their Bulgar, Tatar and Cuman-Kipchak population. Same goes for Ikhanate who adopted the culture of their Iranian and Persian populace. Kazakhs have threee jhuzz; Senior, Middle and Junior comprising of both Turkic and Mongolic ancestry.
Ethnicity does not mean genes but cultural identity which is formed within a group . They can be more similar genetically or less , this is not what matters. What matters is cultural identity Which forms ethnic groups
persians or turkic people never before in history did identify themselves through ethnicity rather through culture and environment. Idk why so many people are obsessed with something which never played an role before for these people
@@randomguy-kn1wl exactly. I am sick of Iranians and Turks. They act as if Turkic and Iranic are not twrms used for language families and instead think all Turkic or Iranic people have same genetics
Precisely.
@@JayzsMrIt’s only the Turkic language and nothing more in common: Neither culture nor genetic background nor common ancestry is in common between a citizen of Turkey and, say, Kazakhstan. It is confused with ethnicity or even race.
My ancestors were nomadic, they rode their horses across vast lands. so that means they married very different cultures:, I mean Russian, Ukranian, Bulgarian, Rum, Armenian, Kurdish, Iranian, Jewish, etc etc. How can I describe this: maybe "steppe tolerance"? And here we are...
My gf is Russian, I speak Turkish my "culture" is Turkish. And I don't give a flying fuck about my "origin" XD
Western authors give additional details about mixed marriages and the children born into such unions. The Latin historians of the Crusades noted in Anatolia a specific group of the Turkopouli (that is, 'the children of the Turks') who were born of a Greek mother and a Turkish father.53 For the beginning of the fourteenth century, the Catalan soldier and chronicler Ramon Muntaner reports that the Turks of western Anatolia married girls from noble Greek families. It is especially interesting that the male children of these mixed marriages 'became Turks and were circumcised', while for female children the choice of religion was free. The same difference between the religious affiliation of boys and girls was reported by Ludolf von Suchen in the middle of the fourteenth century. Von Suchen maintains that when the Turks married Christian women, the boys of the mixed marriages followed the Muslim religion of their fathers while the girls maintained the Christian faith of their mothers.54 However, as we have seen in Byzantine canonical texts, boys also could be baptised by their mothers.
These reports confirm that, firstly, mixed marriages between Muslims and Greek women were common throughout the centuries, and, secondly, that the children of both Muslim and mixed marriages were baptised according to Orthodox Greek rites. The popularity of mixed marriages in Muslim lands has been very clearly demonstrated by a passage from the Byzantine historian of the fifteenth century, Doukas, who, with considerable arrogance, made the following observance about the Ottoman Turks:
The people of this shameless and savage nation, moreover, do the following: if they seize a Greek woman or an Italian woman or a woman of another nation or a captive or a deserter, they embrace her as an Aphrodite or Semele, but a woman of their own nation or of their own tongue they loathe as though she were a bear or a hyena. 55
The predominance of Greek women at the Seljuk harem thus seems to have been merely a royal variation of a common practice in Muslim Anatolia. Greek women were valued as the most prestigious marriage partners among all strata of Muslim society. It was Greek women who guided their Muslim husbands and masters into the refined Byzantine way of life and the world of Byzantine luxury, introducing among other things new cuisines and ways of structuring the household. Although the information on Seljuk marriage policy in the eleventh to twelfth century is scarce, it seems highly probably that the Seljuk harem was modelled along similar lines as other strata of Muslim Anatolian society, with a preference of marriage to Greek women who in turn acted as mediators to the old world of the 'empire of the Romans'.
Peacock, A. and Yildiz, S., 2012. The Seljuks of Anatolia.
The surname Turci is an Italian name derived from the Latin word “turcus”, which means “Turkish”. Due to the prevalence of Italian diaspora, the variant spellings of Turci can be found all around the world.
The Turcilingi (also spelled Torcilingi or Thorcilingi) were an obscure barbarian people, or possibly a clan or dynasty, who appear in historical sources relating to Middle Danubian peoples who were present in Italy during the reign of Romulus Augustulus (475-76).
If you wanna go further back, they were from a small region in Manchuria. That's where the ancestors of Proto Turks/Mongolic/Tungusic and Japonic people are allegedly from
What a fringe theory though
@@papazataklaattiranimam it's not all that plausible. Martine Robbeets published a paper on this.
@@ineedhelpsoundproofing is still supporting by minority of expert scholars
@@papazataklaattiranimam you're one of those anti-altaic theorist
@@ineedhelpsoundproofing yeppp
Very informative narrative. Thanks.
what an amazing clear & fun video ❤
There are still around 20 million Turanid looking people in Turkiye due to their Turkic ancestry.
Hi youtuber friend! Thanks a lot, I have seen your study about Turkey with our turkic euroasian, central asian and northeast asian ancestry.
But again you told like western euroasians are unrelated with turkic people. I will repeat my idea: Saka/Scythian people of euroasia are related to turkic east euroasian, northeast and central asian people. They have been assimilated to indoarian language by persians and caucasian arians during their journey tousands years ago. (Starting from 30k BC to 10k BC with same special stone forming culture)
I. Darius (old persian king) claims himself as "persian of persians, arian of arians" and mentioned about Saka people as foreign people by their central asian origins. Saka means nomad in old persian like some turkic people call themselves as Yürük meaning nomad even today.
Persians (mostly J2 M172) fighted against Saka people of central asia (as written in wiki) and won against turkic central asians and assimilated them by power. Asian hunnic empire and their ancestors are from northeast asia and spread to west and south, some has passed over persia, mesopotamia, anatolia, balkans to euroasia and west europe. Some have become Saka by persian language. Some have changed to european languages.
This is why turkic, ugric, hunnic (also you showed a picture of ak-khion = white hun like north indian huns at 0:28) and the other altaic, uralic, native american people have similar genetics. Their N, O, P, Q, R, R1, R1a, R1b, R2 haplogroups are very different from indoeuropeans: F, G, H, I1, I2, J2, L haplogroups... Altaic, uralic genetics even spread to west and north europe in tousands years. I do not mean all are turkic, but history and science should inspect, understand that they are related to altaic, uralic people.
The Scythians are people of Aryan and Iranian descent, not Turks
@@مهردادبیرانوندی As linguistically yes, but genetically all R1, R1a, R1b, R2 are descendants of P haplogroup of C3, N, O3, P ancient northern east asians ANEA. ANEA are descendants of southeast asian K2, C2 and all were speaking a group of uralic-altaic + dene-caucasian language. ANEA were speaking uralic-altaic languages as referenced from Martine Robeets.
Even R haplogroup is uyghur turkic today and Yakut (Sakut) and Soyot turkic people are speaking still turkic. Soyot, Altai, Tuva people are modern P haplogroup people. Sumerians were named Sagh-gir/Saka by old persians, but they called themselves as Kenghir meaning Huns (Khan-s in english and Khiang-nu in chinese). Sumerian is one of dene-caucasian language family as agglutinative.
@@serkankinden5150Iranians are not mostly J2 and M, but R1a and J2 and G. Stop spreading your racist Iranophobic trash theories in here.
@@مهردادبیرانوندیPanturks don't understand logic. He is a typical panturd spreading BS
@@مهردادبیرانوندی Iranians do not drink kumiss, do not bury their dead in kurgans, do not know tamga. There is no concrete historical source that the Scythians were Iranian. You can read the writings of Plinius Secundus and do historical research.
I am half Turkish and half African American and it’s half to see someone spreading our history
That's fascinating to know that because I remember watching a video about Africans who were born in Turkiye, before the Ottoman Empire fell. 🤔
Dude.. African American !? that's so cool ...
My maternal grandmother is Romanian, my maternal grandfather is Crimean Tatar, my father is a Syrian Arab…
My grand grandfather is Turkish and im from Brazil, so this makes me half Turkish and half Brazilian ?
@@davidfl.220 this is a matter if you feel so or not. If u feel it, no matter what they say…
Are you able to find the background from the last name? I am American Lebanese.. from my last name you can tell it's Turkish "Yazigi".. which means "writer".. my grandfather has blue eyes, my father Green eyes.. I would like to know where in Turkey.
Hi sir
I’m from Afghanistan and my ethnicity is called Hazara.
Can you please do a deep research and analysis on Hazara ethnicity, DNA, origin where we came from, and a little bit of our history.
Hazaralar kesinlikle Türktür dostum. İran'da, Azerbaycan'da ve hatta Ukrayna'da bile yaşıyorlar halâ.
Turkic 🈴
سلام من از ایرانم خیلی از تست ژنتیک های هزار ها را دیده ام بسیاری از افراد دارای ژن مغولی بودن و مقداری کمتر ترکی و مقدار کمتر غرب آسیایی ( شبیه ایران و ترکیه و...)
@@umutkiran3035 Mongolian
I saw a vid on a Afghan Hazara dna test and it's majority Turkic with some Iranian, South Asian and Eastern European.
Sayings of different peoples about the Turks.
1. A chicken is not a bird, a Turk is not a person (Ukrainian proverb)
2. If you want to conceive a child for a Turkish woman, finish her slippers, the flies will finish the job. (Folk proverb)
3. An uninvited guest is like a Turk (Russian proverb)
4. Turkey, the country of the small mind (Slavatian proverb)
5. Rather, a chicken will take off than a Turk will learn to love. (Arabic saying)
6. If you are dealing with a Turk, do not let go of your stick. (Armenian proverb)
7. If you want the Turk to obey you, hit him with a stick. (Armenian proverb)
8. The devil has many guises, the main of which is Turkic. (Assyrian proverb)
9. Where the Turk's foot has gone, the grass does not grow. (Bulgarian proverb)
10. If a Turk speaks of peace, then there will be war. (Greek saying)
11. Bad life, that neighborhood with a Turk. (Kurdish proverb)
12. People are building, the Turks are destroying. (Serbian proverb)
13. The rooster will not lay eggs, and the Turk will not become a man. (Romanian proverb)
14 A jealous husband is like a Turk. (Kozma Prutkov)
15. The Turk is the harbinger of the devil.(Folk proverb)
16. Dirty shit. A good person will not be called a Turk. (Folk proverb)
17. Turks are the weeds of the universe. (Folk proverb)
18. Turks are terribly arrogant, nasty and just bad people (Folk proverb)
19. Turks stupid freaks. They insolently stick to the girls of other nations, sincerely considering them ALL prostitutes and just fools obsessed with sex. Dirty, smelly goats...
20. Turkey was built entirely on foreign blood, by foreign forces and foreign means. This nation of pigs “gave” only chaos to the world and could only create such an “invention” as genocide.
Seems like some bitter and envious shitwords about Turks. :D LOL Guess Turks are on the right way if them are criticized and judged by others. Good for them.
Միգուցե այս խոսքերն ասողը հայ է։ :)))))) You are very funny broo
Maybe the person who said these words is Armenian.
These are very filthy mouths. We have a Turkish saying: 'After all, everyone offers what they eat to the other person!'.We can tell what they eat from their dirty mouths. so They or their ancestors tried to offer something from what they ate, that's all.
Said *rmenian nazi.
Your intro demonstrates clear insights on the subject Congratulations!
Turks, as an ethnic group, exhibit a wide range of phenotypes, which can be attributed to their complex history and the vast geography in which they have settled. It is important to note that phenotype is not the same as DNA, as genes determine many biological traits in humans, while phenotype only encompasses a fraction of these traits.
It is possible for individuals with similar phenotypes to be genetically distinct from one another, while individuals with very different phenotypes may be genetically similar. This highlights the complexity of the relationship between genetics and phenotype, and the importance of considering both when studying human populations.
The study of genetic makeup in ancient populations is a complex and nuanced field, with several potential pitfalls. One significant challenge is the fact that DNA samples extracted from ancient burial sites often come from noble classes or royal families, while samples obtained from contemporary populations often come from common people. This can make it difficult to accurately compare the genetic makeup of ancient and contemporary populations.
One example of this issue can be found in the comparison of medieval Turks (and possibly proto-Turks) with Iranic people. While the noble class of Turkish populations engaged in marriages with nobles from neighboring states and empires as a way of obtaining dowries and acquiring new lands, the noble class of Iranic people practiced incest marriages in order to protect their noble blood. This difference in cultural practices means that it would be misleading to compare the genetic makeup of medieval and proto-Turks with ancient Iranic people in order to determine which group had more West Eurasian genes.
Even in the DNA of (proto) Turks belonging to the noble class, who were heavily mixed with Asiatic populations, there is a significantly higher rate of West Eurasian genes compared to East Eurasian populations. This suggests that these groups initially had West Eurasian roots. It is also important to note that the DNA samples extracted from these groups do not accurately represent the common populations, so it can be assumed that the common people in these countries had diverse populations with a tendency towards West Eurasian.
The comparison of genetic makeup in ancient and contemporary populations can be a complex task, and care must be taken to consider the limitations and biases of the available DNA samples.
It’s insignificant whether Turks were blond or not. Yet, the fact that the Chinese described Turks as having distinctively different physical characteristics from the Iranic people is significant.
The Iranic people are typically described as having physical characteristics similar to Semitic people like the Assyrians or Indian people, while the Turks are described as having blond or light-colored hair and distinctive eye and nose features. This raises the question of who the Turks mixed with to have these distinctive physical characteristics in western and eastern Mongolia, where there are no other populations with West Eurasian genes except for the Turks. It is also worth considering how the Turks could have acquired such distinctive physical traits if they had East Asian origins.
Contemporary Turks can be distinguished from both West Eurasian and East Eurasian people based on their genetic makeup. In comparison to West Eurasian people, Turks have a higher proportion of East Eurasian genes in their DNA, which is not typically found in the genetic makeup of West Eurasian people. On the other hand, Turks can be distinguished from East Eurasian people by the significantly higher proportion of West Eurasian genes in their DNA, suggesting that they have West Eurasian roots and have mixed with East Eurasian people at some point in their history. This is the main difference between Turks and both West Eurasian and East Eurasian people.
It is important to note that genetically, neither West Eurasian genes nor East Eurasian genes determine ethnicities. Rather, they are indicators of migration patterns and ancestral roots. The gene pools of ethnicities naturally enlarge over time as a result of intermarriage and other forms of genetic exchange, and this continuous process is one of the reasons why genetics cannot be used to determine ethnicities with certainty. It is important to recognize that genetics can provide insight into the migration patterns and ancestral roots of certain groups of people, but it does not determine their ethnicity or cultural identity.
Great feedback. Thank you so much👍👍👍
It is possible for individuals with similar phenotypes to be genetically distinct from one another, while individuals with very different phenotypes may be genetically similar. This highlights the complexity of the relationship between genetics and phenotype, and the importance of considering both when studying human populations.
THAT IS THE FACT! I TOTALLY AGREE WITH YOU! AND BIOLOGY AGREES WITH YOU.
Seljkus who came To Anatolia were like %35 Asian. Modern Turks are %7-%20 except eastern black sea.
Seljkus who came To Anatolia were like %35 Asian. Modern Turks are %7-%20 except eastern black sea.@@Ελλάδα-ω3θ
Seljkus who came To Anatolia were like %35 Asian. Modern Turks are %7-%20 except eastern black sea.@@CS-by7sg
Do you accept raw dna files and their analysis?
Do you accept PayPal payments?
Thanks!
Intermarriage between Turks and Greek, Armenian and Georgian natives of Anatolia was not unheard of, although the majority of these unions were between Turkish men and Christian women. The children of these unions, known as 'Mixovarvaroi', were raised as Turks and were of the Muslim faith (although there were some cases of Mixovarvaroi defecting to the Byzantines). It is likely that these unions played a role in the eventual diminishment of the Christian population in Anatolia and its transition from Greek/Christian to Turkish/Muslim. [24]
Vryonis Jr, Speros (1971). The Decline of Medieval Hellenism in Asia Minor and the Process of Islamization from the Eleventh through the Fifteenth Century. California: Berkeley University Press. p. 176.
Well that's the speciality of chuslims
Intermarriages happened in both ways as it can be seen that turkic ydna amongst turks is %30 which is even lower than autosomal turkic heritage
@@meditarrianean337 Most of Turkish Y-Dna is directly from Central Asia
@@papazataklaattiranimam no,most of it is from anatolia
This %30 includes R1a and some J2 subbranches,even with adding them it doesn't go up more than %32,which is lover than turkish autosomal central asian admixture
What’s your opinion on when and where Yamnaya / R1b fit into all of this? Thank you for your time!
In fact, the science of archeology and genetics has shown that the kings of Gok Turks were Iranian, Gok Turks were a combination of several races and ethnicities, especially the Indo-Iranian tribes, the Pashtuns of Afghanistan are descended from Gok Turks.
@@arianjahani2952its totally false
@@arianjahani2952they were from samoyedic ugro finic tribe
I am Turkish and when I asked my origin or which Turk tribe we were from, my grandmother said Kayı tribe. I had just started watching Diriliş Ertuğrul and I was very happy to hear that I was descended from my grandfather Ertuğrul Gazi :D 🐺🇹🇷 Anyway, we entered Anatolia with the Battle of Manzikert. Years later, during the reign of Sultan Alaeddin, Söğüt became ours and we emigrated there. According to what my grandmother said, we were a family known as the Sarılar/Sarular or Saruhanlar back then. And this family of mine went to the Caucasus years later. But towards the end of the Ottoman Empire, due to the persecution of the Turks in the Caucasus, they migrated to the Black Sea region of Turkiye and lived there for a long time. That's why we have both a little Circassianism and Lazism. Of course, maybe I have mistakes, but in general, the historical story of my family was something like thiss. And btw There are many Turks with a similar story like me. This may be the reason why we got mixed. Because we constantly migrated.
This is why my DNA showed up Caucasus, Italy/Greece, ME, Africa North but I’m half Cypriot through my mother side. I don’t understand how Melanesian showed up as well.
What a wonderful story. About 9,000 years ago, you and my common ancestors, who grew millet around Liaohe in northeastern China and overcame the winter cold, would have imagined that you and I would be standing on opposite sides of the globe and meeting on UA-cam.
However, a fundamental fact is left out in this confusion, which means that when listing many nations, we are ultimately only talking about one people, if the white man is included. For example. we are talking about the Huns, whose predecessors were the Scythians. The power of the Huns spread from ocean to ocean, plus they conquered 3/4 of North Africa and India, and of course their descendants remained everywhere. Another example, today's Ukraine and Russia were also inhabited by Scythians, Huns, the Roman slaveholder empire was liquidated.If you take off the clothes of today's nations, it turns out that they all have something in common, this is only possible if, for example, let's look at the Slavs, Scythians inhabited the land, the Mongol invasion came, they became slaves, hence their new name, but the people were not genetically modified.The Royal Szítas, who defeated the Mongols three times in 1242, 1285, 1342, were able to preserve their national intentions.There are countless proofs of this, e.g. China built a museum in honor of the Royal Scythians, the state of Bihar in India was also named after the Royal Scythians, because such a county still exists in their country, Etruscans also come from the Royal Scythians, Italian researchers prove.
Iyıde Osmanlı kayı degıl ki tımur yenılgısı sonrası Türkmenlerin destegını kaybedınce öyle bısey öne surmuslerdır 😅😅😅😅 halıl ınancık dınle ve sen kayı ol Zehra lakın bin yıldır Anadolu halkları ıle kaynaşıp kanı kaybettın Türklüğün tartışılır ve kayı dahı olsan kayının k sı kaldıysa dua et 😅😅😅😅😅😅
@@zehra0628 hahaha sadece kanı kaybetmıs ınsansın kayı degıl k sı kalmadı ;) Türk kanını kültürünü korumuş olandır Anadolu çoğu yerlı halkların devırmesı o yerlı halklar ıle bın yıldır kaynaşan da Türk degıldır kanı kaybetmıstır kayı ımıs :))))))))))) sen gerçek kayı ısen gerçekten Türk ısen ben Mete hanım :) kanen Türk sadece orta Asya’dır İran veya Anadolu karışım mıllettır bılgın olsun yerlıler çok dha fazlaydı bin yıldır kaynaşıyorsun sımdı yallah kültürün de Arab’ın dır
Hey I took a DNA test and after a whole life of thinking I was pure Italian the test came back with heritage in Greece turkey Iran and Iraq. I'm looking to do a deeper test to kind of close in the main 2 between my mom and dad I came from.
I'm Iranian and I'm not Turkish but recently I discovered I have Turkish ancestry so my dads great great great grandfather was the great grandson of a Turkish chiftan or khan as they say and this guy was famous in Iran we searched him up so cool
@@middleeasternforhire8985 that is really cool actually lol
@@anthonyderosa7730 I know right 🤣🤣
Hi there! I suggested you watch the guy’s other video about DNA history of Italy, and then you will realise that there is no such thing as pure Italians in the first place. Modern Italians genetically, speaking are such a wild mixture of north, and south, east and west, in various proportions: the concept of pure Italian is just not existing.
@@DeYiZhiMusilin I see! It's almost like one of the "migration centers" of the world that developed its own strange mixed language and everyone is either African Asian or European lol
Hi, the link to the DNA assessment -above- is not valid, are you still offering it? If you do, what would be the cost? Thank you
Hi I fixed the link
Turks had contacted Chinese long before Persians, Arabs and Europeans During Beizhou dynasty, Ashina, a Göktürk Princess married a Chinese emperor and became a Chinese empress. Her tomb now is in China. Göktürk had their own inscripions in Mongolian and written in both their own language and Chinese.
Indeed, the genuine turks are purely North East Asian based on the recent DNA testing on the body of Empress Ashina or Gokturk Princess.
Historically the descendants of Mongols, but genetically modern day Turks are descendants of Greeks Persians Armenians that were forcefully Turkified through various brutal practices like e.g. devshirme. Practically no central Asian DNA from their place of historical origin in modern day Turks. I can't imagine how it must feel to know that your forefathers were Greeks and one of your great grandparents might have been enslaved or abducted as a child and forcefully indoctrinated to denounce his own kind his and his own parents...
Turks were a thing, when Mongols were a bunch of clans bickering around Onan river.
@@subutaynoyan5372 Except that Turks were a clan that was kicked out by another mongol clan 🤣
@@xenofonkarykis8417 In fucking 11th century
Literally 700 years after their dominion emerged
It's just that tribes went westwards.
You can call mongols upjumped weasels who had the courage to emerge when nobody was around
@@subutaynoyan5372 You don't get to choose when history begins my friend and edit or cut it as you see fit 🤣
@@subutaynoyan5372 Besides, what I find ironic is that you chose as a nickname "subutai" which is a mongol name 🤣🤣🤣
Very informative & interesting 👍🏽
🇹🇷 Turks react to their MyHeritage DNA results 😱😮 note Yunanistanli ➡
@@melehtecolambal💀💀💀💀
Seljuks were %35-%40 Asian and were between Uzbeks and Turkmens autosomally. They didn't look like some Han Chinese. All Turkics are Eurasians. A mix of West and East Eurasian. Modern Turks have %7-%22 east Eurasian ancestry. Thus modern TURKS ARE %20-%45 Seljuk. If you don't know anyting about genetics it's not my fault. Also our non Turkic part is not a monolith either. Modern Anatolian Turks have only %35 ANF ancestry. Hittites had %60+. So no we are not same people with ancient Anatolians at all. A simple calculation of Turkish west Between Medieval samples in Vahaduo;
Target: Turkish(West)
Distance: 0.6720% / 0.00672047
31.2 KAZ_Kipchak
30.2 Anatolia_Center_Phrygian_650BC
16.4 Paleo-Balkan+Slavic_MNE_Doclea_Bjelovine
9.2 Caucasus_BlackSea_Samsun_B_150BC
8.0 IRN_Hasanlu_IA
5.0 Levant_Sidon_1800BC
21 percent minoan greek ,phonesian.12pc semitic.pc hittite, armenian.11pc caucasian, greco anatolian.11pc balkanic , near eastern.7.5 pc baltoslavic,mycenian greek, macedoniangreek.4 pc dinaric , danubian. 4 pc uralofinnic, baltic,siberian. pc arabic. 2 pc arabic. 2pc central asia. 2pc ethiopian egyptian . percent nordic
Lmao what I posted is directly from Vahaduo. You can hate as much as you want. Truth won't change.
Target: Turkish(West)
Distance: 0.6720% / 0.00672047
31.2 KAZ_Kipchak
30.2 Anatolia_Center_Phrygian_650BC
16.4 Paleo-Balkan+Slavic_MNE_Doclea_Bjelovine
9.2 Caucasus_BlackSea_Samsun_B_150BC
8.0 IRN_Hasanlu_IA
5.0 Levant_Sidon_1800BC@@Paraglidecrete
@@xdd87 part of the lyrics in Greek say about keys to secret rooms that should be kept away so nobody sees them , any idea what is the meaning Recebim - Hey Gidi Hey (Horon)
Cinan Müzik
639K subscribers
20,683,292 views
haven't you covered the Turks before?
3:39 This Example is Half Turk Half Sogdian, Also The Turkmens Are Mixture Of Oghuz And Persian People And Not Pure Oghuz. Ancient Oghuzs Are Most Similar to Modern Karakalpaks, Nogais, Bashkirs and Siberian Tatars. The Turks who settled in Anatolia for the first time are closer to the Nogai and Karakalpaks than the Turkmen and they have around %50 East Asian genetics. The Turkmens Are %25 East Asian.
Maybe because Turkic warriors took eastern iranic women before migrated Iran
That is so wrong. Turkmens are not mixed with persians, not even today. And turkmens are not as little as 25% east asian, they are more east asian than the turkish and azeries
@@ghosternz6109
Target: Turkmen
Distance: 4.7275% / 0.04727528
72.6 Caucasoid
27.4 Mongoloid
@@ghosternz6109
Target: Turkmen
Distance: 1.7307% / 0.01730678
57.6 TUR_Ottoman:MA2195
42.4 Iranian_Fars
@@ghosternz6109 +
Target: KAZ_Turk:DA89
Distance: 2.3540% / 0.02354046
55.8 KAZ_Otyrar_Antiquity
44.2 MNG_Early_Med_Turk
Otyrar Antiquity=Sogdian
Early_Med_Turk=Early Gokturks From Mongolia
Starostin, George (2016). "Altaic Languages". Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics.
Despite the validity of many of these objections, it remains unclear whether they are sufficient to completely discredit the hypothesis of a genetic connection between the various branches of “Altaic,” which continues to be actively supported by a small, but stable scholarly minority.
Do you remember Hz Muhammed grandson of Husayn ibn Ali? Don't you think this is forgetting just starting what Timur did Yezid grave compare what I will do nothing. Everyone own free will, crushed all the Türk enemies thanks for remind us kuteybe bin muslim genocide of Turks such as Khorosan, Curcan and Talkan.
Let me clear this out also Türkçe yazicam bunu cemaat ve Tarikatlarin en büyüğü masonlar asılacak ve silinecek diğer cemaat ve tarikatlarda bunun içinde Mehdi çok büyük temizlik yapicak gelen deli bir kişi hepinizi kesicek zalimlerin.
Türkçe yazıcam bunu cemaat ve tarikatlarin en büyüğü masonlar asılacak ve silinecek diğer cemaat ve tarikatlarda bunun içinde Mehdi çok büyük temizlik yapicak gelen deli bir kişi hepinizi kesicek zalimlerin artık siz düşünün nereye kacicaksiniz sizin acı cigliklarinizi göğün 8 katında inletecek bütün evren duyucak Mehdi emin olcak herkes duydu.
Thomas Edward Lawrence CB DSO (16 August 1888 - 19 May 1935) was a British archaeologist, army officer, diplomat, and writer who became renowned for his role in the Arab Revolt (1916-1918) and the Sinai and Palestine Campaign (1915-1918) against the Ottoman Empire during the First World War.
So they are originally from Crimea??? 👌
I live by the Black Sea coast. I am Turkish and I know that some of my ancestors are Oghuz and some of them are Kipchaks. According to my uncle, my maternal side is Scythian. But I know that my father was a definite Oghuz Turk. Although gene analyzes of Turks show some of them as Greek and some as Balkan, the general characteristic of Turks is their short stature. If you examine the height differences, you can analyze how the Turks and Anatolia are shorter than the surrounding countries and the Central Asian connection.
Oğuzuz diyorsunuz ama hangi boyun hangi aşiretinin hangi ailesine mensupsunuz? Bu bilgiler olmadan havada kalıyor. Orta Asya'da kimlikler boy bilgisi üzerinden şekillenir. Kimse kimseye nerelisin diye sormaz, boyunu aşiretini sorar. Orijinal Oğuzları Muğla civarındaki Yörükler de görüyoruz. Zaten Türkiye'de Orta Asya genetiğinin en yoğun olduğu il Muğla. Buranın Yörük Türkmenleri çoğunlukla Tatarlara benzeyen insanlar. 1000 yıl öncesine, en has hallerine gitsek bildiğimiz Moğol tipli insanlar oldukları su götürmez. Zaten son araştırmalarda Anadolu'ya gelen ilk Oğuzların Doğu Asyalı fizyonomlara sahip olduğu anlaşıldı.
Hahahaha, these are Iranians,
@@عليياسر-ذ5ب I've met 3 Iranians before and we're definitely not alike at all. They are darker than us Turks. Maybe you look a little more like the Kurds, but you don't look exactly like the Kurds either. So you are neither Turkish nor Kurdish, we all look different from each other. We are just different nations living in the same geography.
@@hacer6139 So you are like Slavic slaves who were brought by the Romans to be peasants in Anatolia or you are Armenians and Georgians
@@عليياسر-ذ5ب No, I don't look slavic and it's not in my genes. What I'm saying is that Turks and Iranians, even Kurds, are not alike and can be distinguished. For example, I can easily distinguish between a Kurd and a Turk while walking down the street in Turkey.
Im from aegean side of Turkey and i have aralid, first tier turanid phenotype which means most asian, turkic genes and which is common in Kazakhstan 🇰🇿 My father looks like Kurya Han, just without beard
hocam yörükmüsünüz
@@Ataturk_48 evet
@@imnottalkingtoanatolianzombies Normal. Çünkü o bölgedekiler Yörük ve yerleşik hayata geçeli fazla olmadı. Dolayısıyla oranın yerli halklarıyla daha az karıştılar. Türkler Anadolu'da en erken yerleşik hayata Marmara Batı Karadeniz ve Orta Anadolu'da geçtiler. Bu yüzden buradakiler Anadolu'nun yerli halklarıyla daha fazla karıştılar.
Based agean yörük turk
@@turkcukayiyalnkz batı Karadenizde yüksek rekor sonuçlara sahip örneğin bolu, sakarya vb... Ama dediğim iç anadolu için doğru evet iç anadolu genel olarak ortalama sonuçlara sahip o da muhtemelen senin anlattığın nedenler yüzünden
It is common in the Middle East, Maghreb and even Pakistan that people lie about their heritage and say they have Turkish origin to get better acceptance....
Thank you for making this video. I enjoyed watching it. You've comparing the futures of Turkic and Chinese. I think Turkic people had Euroasian features before moving to West. Sometime I meet Turkic people from China's North West. Almost all of them look Euroasian some of them even having blue eyes. Difference between Turkic people and other groups of Chinese are very obvious. My Chinese friend told me once that I look just like European not EuroAsian because I'm an inbreed. 😂😂 Chinese have an interesting way of talking 🤗
I haven't researched much about Turks history since learning at primary school. In primary, I had learnt because of the weather conditions in Siberia, Altai mountains, there weren't much food except yogurt, kefir..., meat that type of food, they had decided moving toward warmer climate. It was decided one section of Turkic people move toward West (and those are today's Hungarian) and the other section toward South West (today's Turkiye) Of course, the movement involved many wars. However, I have read what you've mentioned on the video also in my educational research.
Turks got mixed with Scythians and Saka which are the Iranian tribes many with red hair and blue eyes before moving west. Iranians were neighbor with china as they are today in Badakhshan Tajikestan.
@@jonam7589 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Niece try without any evidence and science.
Iit has made it a profession to refute the Turkish Official History based on the historical view adopted by Atatürk; There are a number of writers who defend the Giladstonist, Renanist, Hitlerist, Sevrid Indo-Aryan European Official History, which stigmatizes Turks as enemies of civilization. Such writers who call themselves "historians" and make them call themselves "historians"; The theses they attacked by saying "Turkish Official History Thesis" were not actually produced by Atatürk in the 1930s; Between 1800-1876, that is, before Atatürk was born, Fergusson, Rawlinson, Layard, Oppert, Cahun, etc. They either do not know at all, or even hide this fact, that hundreds of such Western knowledge is based on their scientific determinations.
Ataturk never interpreted this historical thesis as "Political Expansionism" (Panturanism) and did not apply it as such. With this scientific thesis, Atatürk proved that the Turks, whom the West regarded as barbarians, have a deep-rooted and civilized past within the human family; The West is unscientific. Atatürk responded to "political racist" insults with this scientific thesis, also produced by Western.
@@tengriaslan2423 Barbarians were Germanic, hence West. Is it any different after Barbarians. No. Look at what they did in Africa or Americans. Also, take a history or a science book written for central European schools. You'd think, Western Europe has created the world and the modern science such as maths, chemistry, physics...When Persians and Arabs were creating childrens' stories, novels and also using plants, extracting to make medicine and chemicals as medication, western Europe were killing poor drinking their blood as medicine.
@fugenturkoglu
By Immigrant Europeans Applied to the Native American Turks Genocide types
Ethnic massacre and Ethnic Cleansing: It was deliberately practiced by slaughtering the Native Americans.
Relocation of Native Americans: It was carried out in the form of taking the Native Americans from their geography to another geography.
Native American Reservation-Native American Reserve: It was implemented as the closure of Native Americans to certain places.
Smallpox: It was deliberately and intentionally applied by infecting the Native Americans with old world diseases.
Activities of Christian Missionaries: They were forcibly taken from their families and trained by Christian missionaries in boarding schools in Canada and the USA. The purpose of this education is to make Native American children forget their mother tonque and culture and assimilate them.
Forced Sterilization: It was applied to reduce the number of Native Americans and prevent their reproduction.
Colonialism: It was implemented by exploiting the underground and surface resources of the continent where the Native Americans lived. It continues to be applied especially to Brazilian and Argentine Native Americans. Mourning Day in the Native American, Feast Day in the USA The start date of the genocide against the Native Americans, October 12, is a great day of mourning as viewed by the Native Americans. Because their quiet life changed as of October 12, 1492, and the winds blew in the place of their former lives. The USA, on the other hand, called this day Columbus Day.
Proto-Turks weren’t East Asians but mixed population of Ancient North Eurasians(Q-R ANE) and Ancient North Asians (ANA)
He just exposed how little Turkic dna there is In Turkey 🦃🤡🤥
Q is an East Asian Paternal lineage. R is also a East Eurasian decentdent but mixed heavily with european hunter gathers.
@@saanjanibaar8085 ane were Caucsiod not East Asian or north East Asian that happened later
@@famitsus987 ANE was formed by intermixing of Basal East Asian Tiayunan men with European hunter gatherer women. Q remain majorly among North-East Asian men but R got heavily mixed with European hunter gatherers.
French +German =Turkish people.
???
Nevertheless, Turkic peoples share, to varying degrees, non-linguistic characteristics like cultural traits, ancestry from a common gene pool, and historical experiences.[1]
Most of them are Iranians, Middle Easterners, Slavs, Romans and Greeks
@@عليياسر-ذ5ب So ancient Anatolians like Hattians, Lydians, Hittites etc. did not exist 🐙
@@papazataklaattiranimam Then why don't I see people who look like the Chinese, and I only see those who look like the people of the Middle East, the Greeks, the Romans, and the Greeks?
@@عليياسر-ذ5ب Because there are no Sinitic peoples in Turkey🤣
Thomas Edward Lawrence CB DSO (16 August 1888 - 19 May 1935) was a British archaeologist, army officer, diplomat, and writer who became renowned for his role in the Arab Revolt (1916-1918) and the Sinai and Palestine Campaign (1915-1918) against the Ottoman Empire during the First World War.
This sounds more truthful than the presented vidio , thank you for sharing
I feel like laughing when some Turks consider Turkey a European country!!!
Ask your grand mother , probably she your family from one of Turks solder
350 and before Huns, (Attila ) Avar, cuman & kıpchak , Tatar , blood on your vien .
I don’t know where you from abut check this empire in Europe .
@@Bozok3ok I have nothing to do with turks, but definitely they are not european, they are asian all day.
It’s more like they were refugees due to mongol invasion ,Turks were refugees everywhere in east Europe,Bulgaria ,Hungary,anatoliay
Refugees?
European Hunns collapsed the Roman Empire. They were more like unstoppable nomads.
@@northseaempire2964 l know but Turks were refugees as well from mongol invasions in their lands
@@mrjugurtha4077 That's exactly what nomadic means. Leaving a land after it's dangerous. Refugee means civillians escaping war.
@@northseaempire2964 are you sure
Because l think they are both
@@emre_iris it’s you again bro ,how Are you doing
My maternal grandmother is Romanian, my maternal grandfather is Crimean Tatar, my father is a Syrian Arab…
A) 450 BC ? 😅
the first time the name Turk was mentioned in the history was in the 8th century ( 1200 years ago.)
B) Turk= mongol + another race , any race .
That is why the Turkic nations are on the same path as the Mongolian westward expansion.
C) people of turkey are not Turks .
Turkic world is made up of 4 races , Turco Persians, kyrgies, Uzbek and Kazak Turks .
People of turkey are made up of 43 races .
How could they be Turks with 43 races ?
Nation of turkey was given the title of Turk by England after WWI when the ottomans were destroyed.
Up to 1905 the language in turkey was 80% Farsi and 20% Arabic .
D) no go ahead with your fantasy history.
“ we are Oghuz Turks “
Which one of the 43 races is Oghuz ?😅
Exact description of so called Turkic nations! 👍
A) First of all we see once mentioned the "Turk" name at the Chinese source and its depends to b.c.e 300.
B) Turks and Mongols are not the same race they are just two nation which is too close and they always seperate to different nomad groups. Also the reason of the this two different nation go through that westward together is the because of their nomadic lifestyle.
You especially find the respect of the Turkic nation to Oguz Khan (who is the great Turkic Khan) and Genghis Khan (who is the great Mongol Khan) and their families.
This respect not depend to came from to been same race its depends the leaders charisma. Because these two leaders was reunited the Central Asian tribes.
C) People of Turkey are Turks. I notice that you dont even read any trustful source about Turks or even Ottomans :D. Even in the 1200 ac the great number of Turkmen tent (100.000 according to Latin source) mention to during Frederick Barbarossa's march through the district of Laodekia(Denizli) and the region of the Lakes (around Isparta). Thereafter we will see the more Turkmen came to Anatolia because of the Mongol invasion.
Also Anatolian territories are mentioned as Turchia and Turkmenia from the Venice and Genosia sources since the ac 1200.
D) I hope you don't go with your fantasy history because Turkey is been Turks since 1071 and it will be stay like that
🥲🙃🙃🥲🥲🥲🥲🥲🥲🥲🥲🥲🥲🥲🥲🥲
@@ErdalBaggal-dt6fb //
When I say something I prove it .
You are just telling us stories .
A) this is scientific fact “ Turk is not a race .”
There is no such a thing as Turk DNA.
B) people of turkey came from Asia ?
Your name was mentioned in 300 BC?
If you had come from Asia not 2000 years ago but 20,000 or 50,000 years ago even 100,000 years ago then you would still look Asia .
Evolution takes a 1000,000 years .
This is fact and you can’t deny it.
C) I am a Turk myself.
Us Turks are 4 races:
Turco Persians, kyrgies, Uzbek and Kazak Turks .
People of turkey are 43 races .
Scientifically it is impossible for you to be a Turk .
You are Oghuz Turks ?
Which one of the 43 races is Oghuz?
D) in 1950 total population of Central Asia was 10 million .
In 1950 population of turkey was 21 million .
In 1950 there were only 30,000 Oghuz Turks in kazakistan and there were 21 million of you in turkey .
How did 85 million people in turkey came from 30,000 Oghuz Turks in 70 years ?
E) your country was Byzantine 500 years ago and mongol kazaks took it over.
If you came from Central Asia then where did the people of Byzantine go to ?
Oghuz? 😆
@@drunkbee880
Another weird comment which is not answered my comment.
@@ErdalBaggal-dt6fb //
The answer you want to hear can only be found in coffee shops in Turkey .
Go there and everyone would think that you are genius. 😆
People of Turkey has nothing to do with original Turks(Kokturks). They are just related linguistically at this point and that’s it.
Cry
No, you are wrong.
The cat in the thumbnail is like the most Turkish guy ive ever seen
The thing is sure that in "Turkey" the real Turcs are in minority... They are not more then 6-7 % genetically ...This percentage rise up only 20 % culturally with Iranic people(Scythes ,Sogdians,Bactrians,Harezmians) that they assimilated in Central Asia and emigrated all together to " Turkey" ...This respectfully people ,so the real Turcs are called Turcomans(Turkmen,Yörük,Tahtaci,çepni) actually.... Who are the others 80 % ? They are the people who is converted to Islam and assimilated ti Turkish language and refuged people from Balkan(Bulgar/Pomak,Macedonians,Albanians,Bosnians...) and Caucasians people(Adigey,Chechen,Osetians,Abkhasians)... and dont forgetting the native Anatolians...
That is actually true ...80 % of turkish population is not turk
The Iranic dna is from the Kurds because Kurds are Iranic
why do you add iranic people? Turkic and iranic completely different. one is central asian other one is middle eastern lol. ignorant fake turk
@@imnottalkingtoanatolianzombies The Turco-mongoles tribes has assimilated in Central Asia the Iranic people who is the Sogdians,Bactrians and Harezmians people... You are ignorant...I ma not fake...I am not Turc...Quite simply
No, the average medieval Turkic genetic inheritance in Anatolian Turks is between 25% and 45%
Half of the genetics of Middle African Turkic communities come from eastern Iranic societies
There is no specific "origin" of the Turks. The Ottomans were an assimilated nationality. It's like saying what what is the ethnic origins of Americans? Or what is the ethnic origins of Canadians? Turkishness is a more extreme example of this but all self-proclaimed ethnic groups are of mixed heritage to various degrees. Modernist historians call this habit of collective memory "imagined communities". A person is part of x ethnic group because they believe they are part of that group. That belief is the result of being conditioned by their family and peers to have a particular identity. It's somewhat like how people are brought up to believe the same religion as their parents. (And this is all backed up with genetic testing). This doesn't mean identities are not real. Only that anyone that tries to portray themselves as racially pure needs to lay off the crack.
Lay off the crack 😂😂😂👍
@@viktormogilin307 Science trumps fascist fantasies.
Turkic is a Northeast Asian language and culture that originated from the Mongolian steppe. No scholar questions the historical fact that Turkic homeland is in Mongolia and South Siberia.
Whether people of Anatollia should call themselves Turks is a different issue. They speak a dialect of a Turkic language but do not carry Turkic genetics. More importantly, they don't inherit Turkic nomadic culture, Tengri philosophy, cuisines, music, clothing, etc.
Whether language enough is difficult to say. Using English language doesn't make one English. Shared culture and history also an important part of identity.
@@yo2trader539 This video is referencing Turks in Turkey as DNA "origins" of the Turks. If we are talking the biological origins of the Turks in Turkey its mostly from antolia rather than Mongolia. The reality is modern Turks in Turkey have no single DNA origin
@@mydogsbutler No, the average medieval Turkic genetic inheritance in Anatolian Turks is between 25% and 45%
The remaining genetic heritage of George comes from the local communities of Anatolia
According to historians and linguists, the Proto-Turkic language originated in Central-East Asia region,[39] potentially in Mongolia or Tuva.[40][41] Initially, Proto-Turkic speakers were potentially both hunter-gatherers and farmers, but later became nomadic pastoralists.[42]
You mean Iranian
@@عليياسر-ذ5ب No, Proto Turkic probably originated from an agricultural society in Northeast China associated with the Xinglongwa and Hongshan cultures.
@@wftvtfrctyhrtd i call this bs
@@wftvtfrctyhrtd It is from Mongolia according to most expert scholars if not all
@@wftvtfrctyhrtd I thank you
all i know my mum was tatar and my dads family was from rize but they divorced 2 years later after i was born in Australia. my aunties use to tell me i looked asian when i was younger but not so much now.
The Mongols were NOT MIGRATING . They were invaders, often referred to as the Mongol Hoards .
Turco-Mongol hordes*
Centra Asians not mongols
@@uuuby of the racist Persians
@ddm.567 Mongols is the correct term used for two tribes from the Mongolian Plateau that united under Genghis Khan and swept across /invade Central Asia, Eastern Europe and Europe.
If you knew anything about history Central Asia, Eastern Europe and Europe, ect defined areas, not country or cultures.
@@laara1426
Although the Turks often comprised the bulk of the Mongol army as well as the bulk of armies opposed to the Mongols, throughout the domains of the Mongol Empire there was a diffusion of military technology, which has already bee and also ethnic groups. In addition to the Mongols and Turks, other ethnicities served in the Mongol military machine and found themselves distant from home.
May, T.M., 2012. The Mongol conquests in world history, London: Reaktion Books. p.222
The Turkification of Anatolia wasn't elite domination but an actual demographic transition with recorded constant migrations including two major ones, geographies like Egypt & India also got ruled by Turks for centuries but were never Turkified since there was no significant migration to the regions
2,000,000 Turkic migrants settled in Anatolia during the 12th & 13th centuries
~Peter B.Golden 'An introduction to the history of Turkic peoples: Ethnogenesis and state-formation in medieval and Early modern eurasia and the middle east ' 1992 S. 224-225
Let's talk about genocide of Turk by Kuteybe bin Müslim such as Khorosan, Curcan and talkan genocides? History of Tabari / Volume 3/
The most important points and results of the (TÜRKS)Turkish - Arab wars that lasted for 70 years:
1- Over 100,000 Turks were massacred.
2- More than 50,000 Turkish youth were made slaves and concubines.
3- Cities were plundered, everything of the people was plundered as booty.
4- All riches and historical monuments were destroyed, without not care Kids or Womens were killed.
5- In the "Talkan Massacre", one of the biggest massacres in the world, 40,000 Turks were heads cut down and hung in the trees for 24 kilometers. (History is very rare.)
6- In the same way, the heads of 40,000 Turks who were taken prisoner in the Curcan Massacre were heads cut off by the river, the water of the river turned red, and the corpses were still hanging on the trees.
7- The promise "If you surrender, your life will be spared" was never fulfilled, and men and women were put to the sword by saying "Shariah knows no words".
8- The Arabs have gained great wealth from this greatest looting and plunder they have experienced in history.
9- The Turks have never seen such atrocities and atrocities even from the Chinese.
After these massacres, the Turks were forcibly converted to the Arab religion and assimilated. These historical facts are hidden with the idea of "not be affected by Islam" and are not mentioned.
Thomas Edward Lawrence CB DSO (16 August 1888 - 19 May 1935) was a British archaeologist, army officer, diplomat, and writer who became renowned for his role in the Arab Revolt (1916-1918) and the Sinai and Palestine Campaign (1915-1918) against the Ottoman Empire during the First World War.
The English general reminded me of a quote by freemason Winston Churchill:
" You can never defeat the Turks by fighting, using soldiers and weapons. Capture the clergy of the Turks and use them. They destroy the state! " Winston Churchill
Nizek Tarhan (d. 709, Turkish chief in the Toharistan region. He was killed by beheading on the orders of Kutaybe bin Muslim, the Arab commander who fought against the Turks in the 8th century. Reported from Taberî, Belazuri, Dineverî and İbnü'l-Esir, he writes: "Hajjaj Kutaybe Quteyba then called Nizek to his side and cut his neck. He sent his head to Hajjaj." Kutaybe bin Muslim had hundreds of turks genocided, including the children of Nizek Tarhan, his family and his comrades.
"Doomsday will not come until the Arabs and the Turks fight"
- Hz Muhammed
Not yet happened
I would love to have my DNA investigated!
First Turkish were from Siberian Taiga, not Altai
Yes All People Should Be Represented
As a Romanian from Southern Romania (Wallachia) do I have any genetic similarity with the Turkish people today considering the fact the the Romanian Principalities were never under the Ottoman Empire?
You might have Turkish ancestry, have you done a DNA test before? I would be happy to help you
The stone tablets show Anatolian people never been helenic speaking, except a minority on Aegean shores. See the related books of Archeology.
@ares9473 lmao... there are no NATIVE greek. Greeks assimilated the natives which they call themselves greek now. Greeks did not originate in Anatolia. How could they be NATIVE? You gotta learn what native means.
@@barca8341 Well my friend, i am not an expert on genetics but as far as i know ,greeks are over 64 % anatolian neolithic farmers .We are more anatolians than modern 'turks' .How did we assimilate ourselves ?
Btw i saw a dna test by a 'turk' from sevastia 3 years ago .He scored almost 75% greek
@@jimjim3474 you should ask yourself why the average Kosovo Albanian scores more "Greek". Ask yourself, why Greeks are less "Greek" than Albanians. Because it's PELASGIAN DNA named under a nationality 😂 ALBANIANS built Greece while Greeks are at the beach like lazy bums drinking frappe 😂
@MARS_OPLOMACHUSpontic greek means assimilated Laz or georgian.
The leleges were aegean peoples who were indigenous both in aegean anatolia and greek aegean islands, they then were assimilated by the greeks and luwians. They arent anatolians in the indo european sense, they were aegean people, as most greeks generally are. In fact, west anatolia's aegean region most likely was entirely inhabited by ancient aegean peoples first, either other aegean groups along with the leleges or the leleges were various aegean populations that were labelled with one name. It makes sense, the luwians inhabited like half of the anatolian region, they were a big family, they certainly did absorb people. Some even theorize that the luwic carians actually descended from aegean peoples but were luwianized. Although not proven, there certainly was mixing between the leleges and carians.
There mustn't be a better example of a 'moving' ethno-linguistic group than the Turkic peoples.
They started out from Eastern Siberia (Mongolia, Altai) and now are main ethnic constituents of various countries, like Turkey, Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan, etc.
Turks weren't from Eastern Siberia. They were living in Southern Siberia in the west rather than in the east. In the East proto-Mongols and proto-Tungus people were living. It's only after the Xiongnu conquered Eastern Siberia they had a contact with these East Eurasian populations.
Let's talk about KUTEYBE BİN MÜSLİM GENOCIDE OF TÜRK
It is NOT a REAL TÜRK, WHO FORGETS the HORASAN, CURCAN, TALKAN Massacres!
History of Tabari / Volume 3/
The most important points and results of the (TÜRKS)Turkish - Arab wars that lasted for 70 years:
1- Over 100,000 Turks were massacred.
2- More than 50,000 Turkish youth were made slaves and concubines.
3- Cities were plundered, everything of the people was plundered as booty.
4- All riches and historical monuments were destroyed, without not care kids or womens were killed.
5- In the "Talkan Massacre", one of the biggest massacres in the world, 40,000 Turks were heads cut down and hung in the trees for 24 kilometers. (History is very rare.)
6- In the same way, the heads of 40,000 Turks who were taken prisoner in the Curcan Massacre were heads cut off by the river, the water of the river turned red, and the corpses were still hanging on the trees.
7- The promise "If you surrender, your life will be spared" was never fulfilled, and men and women were put to the sword by saying "Shariah knows no words".
8- The Arabs have gained great wealth from this greatest looting and plunder they have experienced in history.
9- The Turks have never seen such atrocities and atrocities even from the Chinese.
10- After these massacres, the Turks were forcibly converted to the Arab religion and assimilated. These historical facts are hidden with the idea of "not be affected by Islam" and are not mentioned.
Thomas Edward Lawrence CB DSO (16 August 1888 - 19 May 1935) was a British archaeologist, army officer, diplomat, and writer who became renowned for his role in the Arab Revolt (1916-1918) and the Sinai and Palestine Campaign (1915-1918) against the Ottoman Empire during the First World War.
Say hello from me george bush gladio to co-chairman of the Greater Middle East Project recep tayyip erdoğan. Mehdi came into get him and really pissed off. I wonder who is going to came pick up with private jet by FBI to Erdoğan.
Nizek Tarhan (d. 709, Turkish chief in the Toharistan region. He was killed by beheading on the orders of Kutaybe bin Muslim, the Arab commander who fought against the Turks in the 8th century. Reported from Taberî, Belazuri, Dineverî and İbnü'l-Esir, he writes: "Hajjaj Kutaybe Quteyba then called Nizek to his side and cut his neck. He sent his head to Hajjaj." Kutaybe bin Muslim had hundreds of turks genocided, including the children of Nizek Tarhan, his family and his comrades.
The girl in the thumbnail is literally wearing aryan clothing not turkic
There is no such thing as aryan clothing. The girl in the picture literally lives in Krygyzstan, north of Iran, so cultures collide and they wear similar clothing.
@northseaempire2964 there is,she wearing iranian type clothing
@@swasg3129 Aryan doesn't mean Iranian. One culture wearing it doesn't mean it belongs to them, it belongs to the region.
Turks are the decendants of Greek and Armenians who were forced to convert to Islam.
Don't Cry :)
@@yeterhalatci9705He is not lying. The best way to describe Turkish people are 🤥🤡🦃
My fathet is Iraqi Turkmen, and My
Mom is Terekeme from Turkiye.
I score Very High Caucasian and Gedrosia Dna. Only 10% east asian Ancestry :( Haplogroup j2a2 i think i am an Asimilated one :)))
You have to note that only 51 million people out of 88 million people in turkey are ethnic turks the rest are kurds,arabs,laz,bosniak,albanian etc so its normal for ethnically non turks to have non central asian DNA
There is approximately 87 million people in Turkey approximately 25-30 million is Kurdish so now you have 57-62 million and I assume all the others are about approximately 10-12 million and then you have about approximately 50 million who is the Turkish people
@@teknul89 The number kurds in turkey are 18 million but there are also 4 million bosniaks 3 million albanians 2million muslim greeks , 500 thousand armenians, 4 million circassians , one million gypsies, in turkey so unfortunately not all people in turkey are turkish
@@reconscout2238 that’s what I was trying to say to you too but there are more Kurds, Turkish, Bosnians etc since that has been increased in every groups population in recent years
But after the Turks the Kurds are the biggest ethnic group which is about 1/5 of the whole Turkey’s population
@@teknul89 kurds only 15 million not 25 30 😂
Turkish number 60 million
Hi, I'm from Trabzon (Trabizond) and my DNA result was all around the world , Rome, Balcan, West and Central Asia, East Asia and Korea-Japan, Mena(middle east and north Africa even Nigeria) so can l have the legitimaticy to form both Turan and Rome , :)
Mr worldwide ;)
İf you have central asian and japanese and korean you must be a member of Çepni clan of Oğuz's. İn Trabzon province Turkish DNA is nearly 0 except ağsar
It is ignorant to reduce the Turkish DNA to the East Asian component only. The Gokturks had an East Asian component by 25%, while Hun Tianshan only 15%. As for the ancient Turks, they had different components from North Europe, West Eurasia, East Eurasia and Siberia, but the important thing is that not all The Turks of Siberia, Central Asia, and Anatolia are of Turkish origin, so all the Turkish peoples absorbed new peoples, from the Tanguts,Samoyed, Tungus, Mongols, and Anatolians. The ancient Turks were described with Caucasian features, of course, with the exception of the Oghuz, who were always described with East Asian features.
The Kyrgyz, Kipchaks, Bulgars, Bashkirs, Mishars, Huns, Cumans, Tiele, and Qarluqs, before mass mixing with the Mongols, were always described with Caucasian features.
Turks were described as Asiatic(Turanid and Gobid) looking with wide face, big head, small eyes etc.
If we look at the west eurasian component for Turks then it's always gonna point to the Iranian plateau, Caucasus, Balkans and Anatolia (Hitites, Ludwigs etc). The best way to find out how Oghuz they are genetically is by the east eurasian component
@@davidmccarroll2280 inaccurate method
@@papazataklaattiranimam what's method do you suggest is better
@@papazataklaattiranimam only oguz not all Turkic Tribes
Great video!
In fact, Turkness stands for a belief system rather than a race. In ancient middle asia steps, the belief of a single divine God who created the sky and the ground and everything on it, was very common among different clans. The laws of that god were named as "Töre". People who followed the "Töre" named as "Török". They named themselves as Török (Türk) because of their belief system, not because of their race. Some Hungarians still stick to this identity and they define themselves as Török. The name "Turku" is very common in Finland as place name. Khazaks and today's Türkiye Turks look quite different but both admit their origins as Turk.
Many Turks are either European, Middle Eastern, Far Eastern or somewhere in between some have Caucusus mixes within there veins and bloods and cells and vessels.
“Cells and vessels” 🤣🤣
You mean Turks can be found in Europe, Middle East and Far East ? Or are you assuming these geopolitical locations as genetic clusters ?
Over 80% from turkey are Turkified indo europeans and kafkaz (Turkified by oğuz türkmen tribes)
@@Aiga_1 no but most Indo-Europeans are assimilated Early European Farmers, Western Hunter Gatherers, Neolithic Anatolians, Uralics etc.
@@Aiga_1 "Turkified" sound like some kind of soft drink chemical reaction
i am also weeired kind of turk. my parents are from kars but my grand grand father fleed from the north somewhere to Turkey when the russians invated. i am not sure from wich part of causcassus. i think my people are called terekeme or karapapak aswell. so there might be a azeri relation but i dont know. i would like to know more about the history of that dna
@muslimsagainstdegeneration9544 Turks are majority of Kars population around 60%-%70
it has made it a profession to refute the Turkish Official History based on the historical view adopted by Atatürk; There are a number of writers who defend the Giladstonist, Renanist, Hitlerist, Sevrid Indo-Aryan European Official History, which stigmatizes Turks as enemies of civilization. Such writers who call themselves "historians" and make them call themselves "historians"; The theses they attacked by saying "Turkish Official History Thesis" were not actually produced by Atatürk in the 1930s; Between 1800-1876, that is, before Atatürk was born, Fergusson, Rawlinson, Layard, Oppert, Cahun, etc. They either do not know at all, or even hide this fact, that hundreds of such Western knowledge is based on their scientific determinations.
Ataturk never interpreted this historical thesis as "Political Expansionism" (Panturanism) and did not apply it as such. With this scientific thesis, Atatürk proved that the Turks, whom the West regarded as barbarians, have a deep-rooted and civilized past within the human family; The West is unscientific. Atatürk responded to "political racist" insults with this scientific thesis, also produced by Western.
@@VSLS06 NO
I recently took a DNA test, and coming from Hannover in Germany, I expected a mix of French, maybe Polish, Italian and so on. What came back was 80% German, 20% Swedish and 10% Norwegian. I am slightly confused that Swedish and Norwegian DNA would be classed as separate entities! By the way, I am using my partner's account, which is why I look Chinese. ;)
sen Türk deyilsin
110%???
@@Daryajun Uncle Rukus is 102% African with a 2% margin of error.
Is the name German an ethnic name by which people call themselves, does it not. Does the blood in the DNA comes with that name written in it?
I'm still unconvinced why German, Swedish, and Norwegian can be different entities. Germanic people migrated into Scandinavia in ancient times. So how can these genetics tests pinpoint the wave of migration unless there was clear genetic mutation.
For instance, Normans (Norseman) were French-speaking Vikings from Scandinavia who mixed with indigenous Celtic and Franks. Vikings from Dane-law era were Old Norse speaking Germanic people from Denmark. Anglo, Saxons, Frisians...were Germanic-speaking tribes from coastal Germany and Netherlands. As such, have no idea how a genetic test can different these people.
Yorum ve bilgileriniz gerçekçi ve ciddi görünüyor,lakin altyazılı olamazmı,teşekkürler
I am Uyghur Turk .
And the most difficult question in my life : where are you from ?
East Türkistan ❤
@@ryuzakilawliet7815 that’s the point : no one knows where is it
Proposals for the homeland of the Turkic peoples and their language are far-ranging, from the Transcaspian steppe to Northeastern Asia (Manchuria).[2] Peter Benjamin Golden listed Proto-Turkic lexical items about the climate, topography, flora, fauna, people's modes of subsistence in the hypothetical Proto-Turkic Urheimat and proposed that the Proto-Turkic Urheimat was located at the southern, taiga-steppe zone of the Sayan-Altay region.[3] According to Yunusbayev et al. (2015), genetic evidence points to an origin in the region near South Siberia and Mongolia as the "Inner Asian Homeland" of the Turkic ethnicity.[4] Similarly several linguists, including Juha Janhunen, Roger Blench and Matthew Spriggs, suggest that Mongolia is the homeland of the early Turkic language.[5]
The origins of the Turkic peoples has been a topic of much discussion.[107][108] Peter Benjamin Golden listed Proto-Turkic lexical items about the climate, topography, flora, fauna, people's modes of subsistence in the hypothetical Proto-Turkic Urheimat and proposed that the Proto-Turkic Urheimat was located at the southern Altai-Sayan region in Siberia.[109] A possible genealogical link of the Turkic languages to Mongolic and Tungusic languages, specifically a hypothetical homeland in Manchuria, such as proposed in the Transeurasian hypothesis, by Martine Robbeets, has received support but also criticism, with opponents attributing similarities to long-term contact.[110][111][112] Linguistic and genetic evidence strongly suggest an early presence of Turkic peoples in Mongolia.[113][107][114][115] The proto-Turkic-speakers may have been linked to Neolithic East Asian agricultural societies in Northeastern China, which is to be associated with the Xinglongwa culture and the succeeding Hongshan culture, based on varying degrees of specific Northeast Asian genetic substratum among modern Turkic speakers.[116][117][114] The East Asian agricultural roots of the Proto-Turkic language have been corroborated in multiple recent studies. According to historians, "the Proto-Turkic subsistence strategy included an agricultural component, a tradition that ultimately went back to the origin of millet agriculture in Northeast China".[116][117][114] Around 2,200 BC, the agricultural ancestors of the Turkic peoples probably migrated westwards into Mongolia, where they adopted a pastoral lifestyle, in part borrowed from Iranian peoples. Given nomadic peoples such as Xiongnu, Rouran and Xianbei share underlying genetic ancestry "that falls into or close to the northeast Asian gene pool", the proto-Turkic language likely originated in northeastern Asia.[118]
Sen yine mi aktive edildin ey trol? Türkçe videoların altında şeriatçı kisvesine bürünüp Atatürk'e ve cumhuriyet değerlerine söv, milleti birbirine kırdırmaya çalış, sonra da gelip böyle videoların altında tarihçi/antropolog havalarına gir. Kim tutuyor senin tasmanı?
Turks are literal mongloids. People in turkey are not turkic
@@wftvtfrctyhrtd In recent years, the origin of the Turkish language and people has been a topic of much debate among linguists and anthropologists and different theories have been proposed..
A recent study by a group of linguists has proposed that the proto-Turks, the ancient ancestors of the Turkish people, were initially an agricultural society, and that their original homeland, or urheimat, was located in Manchuria.
According to this theory, Manchuria is the only suitable place for the urheimat of the proto-Turks because it has the right combination of geographic landscape and animal and plant life to support an agricultural society. This theory also claims that proto-Turks were 100% East Asian.
However, not all scholars agree with this theory. Some have pointed out that when comparing the languages that originated in Manchuria, such as Korean, Japanese, Mongolian, Tungusic, with Turkish, Turkish lacks the substantial amount of Chinese words found in the other languages. Furthermore, the vocabulary related to agriculture does not match up with that of the other languages.
Instead, these scholars argue that the agricultural terms that are common among the Turkish-speaking people across a wide geographic area are more similar to those of West Eurasian and Mesopotamian populations, such as Sumerians, as well as the Hungarians and Ancient Greek. This, they argue, suggests that the urheimat of the proto-Turks was located in a different region than Manchuria.
It is therefore very likely that the proto-Turks followed a different route of migration than the East Asian populations, and it is possible that they met in the region known as Mongolia today and most likely the route they followed instead was through Mesopotomatia and Anatolia to southern Urals and then they reached Southern Siberia where they emerged as a distinct ethnic group.
In conclusion, the debate over the origin of the Turkish language and people is ongoing and different theories have been proposed. However, the claim of Manchurian origin of (proto) Turkish language and thus their being 100 percent East Eurasian people is very flimsy. All the genetic and linguistic evidence available suggests that proto-Turks had West Eurasian roots. Hence it’s a very viable idea that that they followed a different route than the East Eurasian populations albeit they met in the lands called Mongolia today.
Thomas Edward Lawrence CB DSO (16 August 1888 - 19 May 1935) was a British archaeologist, army officer, diplomat, and writer who became renowned for his role in the Arab Revolt (1916-1918) and the Sinai and Palestine Campaign (1915-1918) against the Ottoman Empire during the First World War.
Mr. Okan Guncu, are you saying that there never was a Byzantine Empire? Alexander spread the Hellenic language as far as Bactria. The Greeks who converted to Islam are now considered Turks but their DNA has not changed.
Saying by Hellenized Hittite😂
Türklerden bahs etmişsiniz ama Türkçe altyazı koymamışsınız
Evet bide yalan söylüyor
Turks aren't very turkic
@@JohnSmith-en6ev Are you joke? You are idoit.
@@JohnSmith-en6ev Cry
Modern Turkish people of Turkey are actually Byzantine Greeks in the west, Armenians, Kurdish in east, Arabs in south, who all these they change identity to Turkic because of Ottoman empire
Real
@wratch 😁
@@papazataklaattiranimam Not actually. Anatolia has never been Greek. It has been linguistically Hellenized due to Christianization. Kurds are recent wave of migration. Their existence in Anatolia date back to 1500s. They came even after Turks.
East is kurdized armenians 😂
You forgot cherkessian, albanian,bosnian, abhasian, checenians
The Janissaries and slaves the Turks took have a lot to do with it!
we made slavs slaves. at golden horde and ottoman times. thats why you call slavic people slav.
if timur didnt destroyed golden horde, there wouldnt be any rus or slavic state now. (both timur and golden horde is turkic btw, turks always fought each other. couldnt imagine if they were united. even in mongol empire chengis khan times not all turks united.)
@@imnottalkingtoanatolianzombies You will find history did not start with the modern english language, go back 2 to 3 hundred years & you wouldn't understand it while old & modern Slavonic languages have a direct link to Sanskrit that can still be understood, that would make you incorrect, Ïзучи ïcторïю балабол пустословний, а тогда можно на приму потолковати 👍😉😊😂
@@viktormogilin307 No janissary is a eunuch. There has never been such a practice. Janissaries are forbidden to marry until the age of 40, if they want to retire when they reach the age of 40 and start a life for themselves, or make a career and embellish their life as a higher-ranking commander, even if they choose to pursue a career, they have the right to marry.
Seljkus who came To Anatolia were like %35 Asian. Modern Turks are %7-%20 except eastern black sea.
That Greek on the thumbnail is killing me 😂🥲
They are mainly anatolians who adopted the turkic culture and language
Cry more. We are Turks 😉
@@yeterhalatci9705 seems like you are the only one crying here
@@AB-fr2ei more cry :)