Piers. She doesn't know what "Denounce" means. You should have said, "Are you prepared to rant, devoid of any intellect, or a basic understanding of the subject matter", and maybe also mentioned that being born in 1980 does not absolve her from her lack of knowledge for the ethos of the party she represents...... .
Simple question…. Once she’s managed to destroy public schools… where do the children go? Do they tax people more to build more state schools for them because the current schools are already full?
No. Being a Northerner doesn’t make her a chav. Being a chav makes her a chav. I wish that the Labour Party would stop putting stereotypes in power to convince the country that they are all inclusive. It’s like making Doctor Who a woman. 😅 With all due respect to the wonderful Jodie Whittaker.
She Really does not deliver Confidence that she is capable, of the Job , and still does not today , time to pack up and go back to being a carer in Manchester , Bye Rayber Leave....
Exactly. We don’t even know the context. It could have been about a particular conflict or battle that the British were at fault for. He never explained it.
When politicians dont know the answer or have plans they dont want to talk about they go off on a completely different direction. Getting a straight answer if ever you might as well pray to st jude the patron saint of lost causes.
But it was a super dumb question😂 I believe this interview was supposed to talk about the education system which is why she tried focusing on that and obviously she is not going to condemn her colleague for something a conservative man said happened in 1984 😅 plz use ur brain a bit more that’s what’s needed of the British people right now
@@geoffwright9570 I know however you have to remember that politicians are often baited in these interviews into giving hasty answers that the interviewers can then use for propaganda and increase wiews on their channel. That’s one reason why politicians don’t usually answer a question directly. It’s also because they are there because they want to talk about what they are going to do for the country not just answer dumb questions
And that my friends is a sample of what to expect if that rabble get elected. Say 'no thanks' to the two party seesaw - vote REFORM.
Piers. She doesn't know what "Denounce" means. You should have said, "Are you prepared to rant, devoid of any intellect, or a basic understanding of the subject matter", and maybe also mentioned that being born in 1980 does not absolve her from her lack of knowledge for the ethos of the party she represents...... .
She's only deputy, because the Labour Party block vote placed her there. Keir Starmer had wanted to replace her with Rachel Reeves for a long time...
Blood from a stone.
Foul woman.
Simple question…. Once she’s managed to destroy public schools… where do the children go? Do they tax people more to build more state schools for them because the current schools are already full?
Typical rayner refusing to answer the question
She wasn’t given the quote in context so how can she respond to it?
What a ridiculous question. He never gave the quote in context. How can she reply to it?
She had some oomph,and seemed left wing at the start.Saw her yesterday on GMTV, she's become a Stepford Starmer MP now.
If only she’d stayed on for the sixth form!
It’s a real winner for the Tories having a chav in the Labour Party
Does a Northern Accent make someone a Chav?
No. Being a Northerner doesn’t make her a chav. Being a chav makes her a chav. I wish that the Labour Party would stop putting stereotypes in power to convince the country that they are all inclusive. It’s like making Doctor Who a woman. 😅 With all due respect to the wonderful Jodie Whittaker.
1984 lmfa get a grip on reality
She Really does not deliver Confidence that she is capable, of the Job , and still does not today , time to pack up and go back to being a carer in Manchester , Bye Rayber Leave....
I’ve no time for Angela Rayner , but the argument being put forward by Piers Morgan is simply ridiculous.
Exactly. We don’t even know the context. It could have been about a particular conflict or battle that the British were at fault for. He never explained it.
When politicians dont know the answer or have plans they dont want to talk about they go off on a completely different direction. Getting a straight answer if ever you might as well pray to st jude the patron saint of lost causes.
But it was a super dumb question😂 I believe this interview was supposed to talk about the education system which is why she tried focusing on that and obviously she is not going to condemn her colleague for something a conservative man said happened in 1984 😅 plz use ur brain a bit more that’s what’s needed of the British people right now
She could have given an opinion making it plain it was based on the present time.
@@geoffwright9570 I know however you have to remember that politicians are often baited in these interviews into giving hasty answers that the interviewers can then use for propaganda and increase wiews on their channel. That’s one reason why politicians don’t usually answer a question directly. It’s also because they are there because they want to talk about what they are going to do for the country not just answer dumb questions
Stupid question…good answer
Can't stand Morgan's squeaky,piggy voice
Pierce is a propper tool with a bee in his bonnet
Wow still clinging on to imperial policys , piers please stop clinging onto this imperial self importance 🤣FFS!
As a nation, Imperialism ended years ago. Move on FFS!
It would be nice if she learnt to speak correctly
Grow up. Not everyone speaks with queens English.
😂😂😂😂😂😂
ARe vicky Pollard and Angela Rayner the same person